Comparing anomaly-detection algorithms for keystroke dynamics
Keystroke dynamics-the analysis of typing rhythms to discriminate among users-has been proposed for detecting impostors (i.e., both insiders and external attackers). Since many anomaly-detection algorithms have been proposed for this task, it is natural to ask which are the top performers (e.g., to...
Uloženo v:
| Vydáno v: | 2009 IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems & Networks s. 125 - 134 |
|---|---|
| Hlavní autoři: | , |
| Médium: | Konferenční příspěvek |
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Vydáno: |
IEEE
01.06.2009
|
| Témata: | |
| ISBN: | 1424444225, 9781424444229 |
| ISSN: | 1530-0889 |
| On-line přístup: | Získat plný text |
| Tagy: |
Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
|
| Shrnutí: | Keystroke dynamics-the analysis of typing rhythms to discriminate among users-has been proposed for detecting impostors (i.e., both insiders and external attackers). Since many anomaly-detection algorithms have been proposed for this task, it is natural to ask which are the top performers (e.g., to identify promising research directions). Unfortunately, we cannot conduct a sound comparison of detectors using the results in the literature because evaluation conditions are inconsistent across studies. Our objective is to collect a keystroke-dynamics data set, to develop a repeatable evaluation procedure, and to measure the performance of a range of detectors so that the results can be compared soundly. We collected data from 51 subjects typing 400 passwords each, and we implemented and evaluated 14 detectors from the keystroke-dynamics and pattern-recognition literature. The three top-performing detectors achieve equal-error rates between 9.6% and 10.2%. The results-along with the shared data and evaluation methodology-constitute a benchmark for comparing detectors and measuring progress. |
|---|---|
| ISBN: | 1424444225 9781424444229 |
| ISSN: | 1530-0889 |
| DOI: | 10.1109/DSN.2009.5270346 |