Towards a Reconfigurable Bit-Serial/Bit-Parallel Vector Accelerator using In-Situ Processing-In-SRAM
Vector accelerators can efficiently execute regular data-parallel workloads, but they require expensive multi-ported register files to feed large vector ALUs. Recent work on in-situ processing-in-SRAM shows promise in enabling area-efficient vector acceleration. This work explores two different appr...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems proceedings S. 1 - 5 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Tagungsbericht |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
IEEE
01.10.2020
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| ISBN: | 9781728133201, 1728133203 |
| ISSN: | 2158-1525 |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| Zusammenfassung: | Vector accelerators can efficiently execute regular data-parallel workloads, but they require expensive multi-ported register files to feed large vector ALUs. Recent work on in-situ processing-in-SRAM shows promise in enabling area-efficient vector acceleration. This work explores two different approaches to leveraging in-situ processing-in-SRAM: BS-VRAM, which uses bit-serial execution, and BP-VRAM, which uses bit-parallel execution. The two approaches have very different latency vs. throughput trade-offs. BS-VRAM requires more cycles per operation, but is able to execute thousands of operations in parallel, while BP-VRAM requires fewer cycles per operation, but can only execute hundreds of operations in parallel. This paper is the first work to perform a rigorous evaluation of bit-serial vs. bit-parallel in-situ processing-in-SRAM. Our results show that both approaches have similar area overheads. For 32-bit arithmetic operations, BS-VRAM improves throughput by 1.3-5.0× compared to BP-VRAM, while BP-VRAM improves latency by 3.0-23.0× compared to BS-VRAM. |
|---|---|
| ISBN: | 9781728133201 1728133203 |
| ISSN: | 2158-1525 |
| DOI: | 10.1109/ISCAS45731.2020.9181068 |

