Performance analysis and evaluation of proposed algorithm for advance options of H.263 and H.264 video codec

This paper deals with the evaluation, analysis and algorithm of advance options of H.263 and H.264/AVC video codec. Analysis and evaluation of H.263 video codec is important because it enable us to determine output parameter, which is peak signal to noise ratio (PSNR) or quality of picture. In this...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:2015 International Conference on Recent Developments in Control, Automation and Power Engineering (RDCAPE) pp. 371 - 376
Main Authors: Ansari, M. A., Khan, Imran Ullah
Format: Conference Proceeding
Language:English
Published: IEEE 01.03.2015
Subjects:
CABAC
CAVLC
Decoding
Encoding
H.264/AVC
PSNR and SBAC
Streaming media
Syntactics
Video codecs
Video coding
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This paper deals with the evaluation, analysis and algorithm of advance options of H.263 and H.264/AVC video codec. Analysis and evaluation of H.263 video codec is important because it enable us to determine output parameter, which is peak signal to noise ratio (PSNR) or quality of picture. In this paper, the performance of H.263 video codec is evaluated and analyzed for various advance options such as syntax based arithmetic coding (SBAC), advanced prediction mode, unrestricted motion vector mode etc. The H.264/AVC is an international video coding standard, jointly developed by groups from ISO/IEC and ITU-T, which aims at achieving improved compression performance. Various applications of H.264/AVC include conversational, storage, and streaming. For H.264 Video codec we proposed algorithm for advance options such as context adaptive binary arithmetic coding (CABAC). The improvement in video quality with the use of these advance options of H.263 is of the order of 0.8 dB or more. The compression efficiency of CABAC is 10-15% better as compared to context adaptive variable length coding (CAVLC) and it can be up to 32% better when compared to other entropy compression methods such as Huffman Coding.
DOI:10.1109/RDCAPE.2015.7281427