Analysis, evaluation, and comparison of algorithms for scheduling task graphs on parallel processors

In this paper, we survey algorithms that allocate a parallel program represented by an edge-weighted directed acyclic graph (DAG), also called a task graph or macro-dataflow graph, to a set of homogeneous processors, with the objective of minimizing the completion time. We analyze 21 such algorithms...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Proceedings Second International Symposium on Parallel Architectures, Algorithms, and Networks (I-SPAN'96) s. 207 - 213
Hlavní autoři: Ahmad, I., Yu-Kwong Kwok, Min-You Wu
Médium: Konferenční příspěvek
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: IEEE 1996
Témata:
ISBN:0818674601, 9780818674600
ISSN:1087-4089
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:In this paper, we survey algorithms that allocate a parallel program represented by an edge-weighted directed acyclic graph (DAG), also called a task graph or macro-dataflow graph, to a set of homogeneous processors, with the objective of minimizing the completion time. We analyze 21 such algorithms and classify them into four groups. The first group includes algorithms that schedule the DAG to a bounded number of processors directly. These algorithms are called the bounded number of processors (BNP) scheduling algorithms. The algorithms in the second group schedule the DAG to an unbounded number of clusters and are called the unbounded number of clusters (UNC) scheduling algorithms. The algorithms in the third group schedule the DAG using task duplication and are called the task duplication based (TDB) scheduling algorithms. The algorithms in the fourth group perform allocation and mapping on arbitrary processor network topologies. These algorithms are called the arbitrary processor network (APN) scheduling algorithms. The design philosophies and principles behind these algorithms are discussed, and the performance of all of the algorithms is evaluated and compared against each other on a unified basis by using various scheduling parameters.
ISBN:0818674601
9780818674600
ISSN:1087-4089
DOI:10.1109/ISPAN.1996.508983