Different beliefs about pain perception in the vegetative and minimally conscious states: a European survey of medical and paramedical professionals

Pain management in severely brain-damaged patients constitutes a clinical and ethical stake. At the bedside, assessing the presence of pain and suffering is challenging due to both patients' physical condition and inherent limitations of clinical assessment. Neuroimaging studies support the exi...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Progress in brain research Ročník 177; s. 329
Hlavní autoři: Demertzi, A, Schnakers, C, Ledoux, D, Chatelle, C, Bruno, M-A, Vanhaudenhuyse, A, Boly, M, Moonen, G, Laureys, S
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: Netherlands 2009
Témata:
ISSN:1875-7855, 1875-7855
On-line přístup:Zjistit podrobnosti o přístupu
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Abstract Pain management in severely brain-damaged patients constitutes a clinical and ethical stake. At the bedside, assessing the presence of pain and suffering is challenging due to both patients' physical condition and inherent limitations of clinical assessment. Neuroimaging studies support the existence of distinct cerebral responses to noxious stimulation in brain death, vegetative state, and minimally conscious state. We here provide results from a European survey on 2059 medical and paramedical professionals' beliefs on possible pain perception in patients with disorders of consciousness. To the question "Do you think that patients in a vegetative state can feel pain?," 68% of the interviewed paramedical caregivers (n=538) and 56% of medical doctors (n=1166) answered "yes" (no data on exact profession in 17% of total sample). Logistic regression analysis showed that paramedical professionals, religious caregivers, and older caregivers reported more often that vegetative patients may experience pain. Following professional background, religion was the highest predictor of caregivers' opinion: 64% of religious (n=1009; 850 Christians) versus 52% of nonreligious respondents (n=830) answered positively (missing data on religion in 11% of total sample). To the question "Do you think that patients in a minimally conscious state can feel pain?" nearly all interviewed caregivers answered "yes" (96% of the medical doctors and 97% of the paramedical caregivers). Women and religious caregivers reported more often that minimally conscious patients may experience pain. These results are discussed in terms of existing definitions of pain and suffering, the remaining uncertainty on the clinical assessment of pain as a subjective first-person experience and recent functional neuroimaging findings on nociceptive processing in disorders of consciousness. In our view, more research is needed to increase our understanding of residual sensation in vegetative and minimally conscious patients and to propose evidence-based medical guidelines for the management of possible pain perception and suffering in these vulnerable patient populations.
AbstractList Pain management in severely brain-damaged patients constitutes a clinical and ethical stake. At the bedside, assessing the presence of pain and suffering is challenging due to both patients' physical condition and inherent limitations of clinical assessment. Neuroimaging studies support the existence of distinct cerebral responses to noxious stimulation in brain death, vegetative state, and minimally conscious state. We here provide results from a European survey on 2059 medical and paramedical professionals' beliefs on possible pain perception in patients with disorders of consciousness. To the question "Do you think that patients in a vegetative state can feel pain?," 68% of the interviewed paramedical caregivers (n=538) and 56% of medical doctors (n=1166) answered "yes" (no data on exact profession in 17% of total sample). Logistic regression analysis showed that paramedical professionals, religious caregivers, and older caregivers reported more often that vegetative patients may experience pain. Following professional background, religion was the highest predictor of caregivers' opinion: 64% of religious (n=1009; 850 Christians) versus 52% of nonreligious respondents (n=830) answered positively (missing data on religion in 11% of total sample). To the question "Do you think that patients in a minimally conscious state can feel pain?" nearly all interviewed caregivers answered "yes" (96% of the medical doctors and 97% of the paramedical caregivers). Women and religious caregivers reported more often that minimally conscious patients may experience pain. These results are discussed in terms of existing definitions of pain and suffering, the remaining uncertainty on the clinical assessment of pain as a subjective first-person experience and recent functional neuroimaging findings on nociceptive processing in disorders of consciousness. In our view, more research is needed to increase our understanding of residual sensation in vegetative and minimally conscious patients and to propose evidence-based medical guidelines for the management of possible pain perception and suffering in these vulnerable patient populations.
Pain management in severely brain-damaged patients constitutes a clinical and ethical stake. At the bedside, assessing the presence of pain and suffering is challenging due to both patients' physical condition and inherent limitations of clinical assessment. Neuroimaging studies support the existence of distinct cerebral responses to noxious stimulation in brain death, vegetative state, and minimally conscious state. We here provide results from a European survey on 2059 medical and paramedical professionals' beliefs on possible pain perception in patients with disorders of consciousness. To the question "Do you think that patients in a vegetative state can feel pain?," 68% of the interviewed paramedical caregivers (n=538) and 56% of medical doctors (n=1166) answered "yes" (no data on exact profession in 17% of total sample). Logistic regression analysis showed that paramedical professionals, religious caregivers, and older caregivers reported more often that vegetative patients may experience pain. Following professional background, religion was the highest predictor of caregivers' opinion: 64% of religious (n=1009; 850 Christians) versus 52% of nonreligious respondents (n=830) answered positively (missing data on religion in 11% of total sample). To the question "Do you think that patients in a minimally conscious state can feel pain?" nearly all interviewed caregivers answered "yes" (96% of the medical doctors and 97% of the paramedical caregivers). Women and religious caregivers reported more often that minimally conscious patients may experience pain. These results are discussed in terms of existing definitions of pain and suffering, the remaining uncertainty on the clinical assessment of pain as a subjective first-person experience and recent functional neuroimaging findings on nociceptive processing in disorders of consciousness. In our view, more research is needed to increase our understanding of residual sensation in vegetative and minimally conscious patients and to propose evidence-based medical guidelines for the management of possible pain perception and suffering in these vulnerable patient populations.Pain management in severely brain-damaged patients constitutes a clinical and ethical stake. At the bedside, assessing the presence of pain and suffering is challenging due to both patients' physical condition and inherent limitations of clinical assessment. Neuroimaging studies support the existence of distinct cerebral responses to noxious stimulation in brain death, vegetative state, and minimally conscious state. We here provide results from a European survey on 2059 medical and paramedical professionals' beliefs on possible pain perception in patients with disorders of consciousness. To the question "Do you think that patients in a vegetative state can feel pain?," 68% of the interviewed paramedical caregivers (n=538) and 56% of medical doctors (n=1166) answered "yes" (no data on exact profession in 17% of total sample). Logistic regression analysis showed that paramedical professionals, religious caregivers, and older caregivers reported more often that vegetative patients may experience pain. Following professional background, religion was the highest predictor of caregivers' opinion: 64% of religious (n=1009; 850 Christians) versus 52% of nonreligious respondents (n=830) answered positively (missing data on religion in 11% of total sample). To the question "Do you think that patients in a minimally conscious state can feel pain?" nearly all interviewed caregivers answered "yes" (96% of the medical doctors and 97% of the paramedical caregivers). Women and religious caregivers reported more often that minimally conscious patients may experience pain. These results are discussed in terms of existing definitions of pain and suffering, the remaining uncertainty on the clinical assessment of pain as a subjective first-person experience and recent functional neuroimaging findings on nociceptive processing in disorders of consciousness. In our view, more research is needed to increase our understanding of residual sensation in vegetative and minimally conscious patients and to propose evidence-based medical guidelines for the management of possible pain perception and suffering in these vulnerable patient populations.
Author Demertzi, A
Schnakers, C
Ledoux, D
Boly, M
Laureys, S
Bruno, M-A
Vanhaudenhuyse, A
Moonen, G
Chatelle, C
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: A
  surname: Demertzi
  fullname: Demertzi, A
  organization: Coma Science Group, Cyclotron Research Center and Neurology Department, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
– sequence: 2
  givenname: C
  surname: Schnakers
  fullname: Schnakers, C
– sequence: 3
  givenname: D
  surname: Ledoux
  fullname: Ledoux, D
– sequence: 4
  givenname: C
  surname: Chatelle
  fullname: Chatelle, C
– sequence: 5
  givenname: M-A
  surname: Bruno
  fullname: Bruno, M-A
– sequence: 6
  givenname: A
  surname: Vanhaudenhuyse
  fullname: Vanhaudenhuyse, A
– sequence: 7
  givenname: M
  surname: Boly
  fullname: Boly, M
– sequence: 8
  givenname: G
  surname: Moonen
  fullname: Moonen, G
– sequence: 9
  givenname: S
  surname: Laureys
  fullname: Laureys, S
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19818911$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNpNUMtOwzAQtFARfcAngHwDDgFvHnbMDZXykCpxAM7VJlmDUeqEOKnU_-CDsaCVOM2OdnZnZ6ds5BpHjJ2CuAIB8vpFCKUjCXFyIfQlKBXHERywCeQqi1SeZaN_9ZhNvf8UIlZapEdsDDqHXANM2PedNYY6cj0vqLZkPMeiGXreonW8pa6ktreN44H1H8Q39E499nZDHF3F19bZNdb1lpeN86VtBs996JO_4cgXQ9e0hI77odvQljeGr6myJda_wy12uOdt1xjyPjhh7Y_ZoQlAJzucsbf7xev8MVo-PzzNb5cRJSn0UZwiKqrySiPkJZZGAWoiIwtp0jJNMEUpBUqVGK3BUJZAmikscpAUVwDxjJ3_7Q3uXwP5frW2vqS6RkchyUolqcghSWRQnu2UQxFOXrVdiN1tV_tHxj_QqHv2
ContentType Journal Article
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1016/S0079-6123(09)17722-1
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod no_fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Anatomy & Physiology
EISSN 1875-7855
ExternalDocumentID 19818911
Genre Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
GeographicLocations Europe
GeographicLocations_xml – name: Europe
GroupedDBID ---
--K
-~X
.55
0R~
123
3O-
53G
5RE
8NA
8NC
8NF
AALRI
AAPMF
AAXUO
AAYSV
ABGWT
ABMAC
ABQQC
ACGFS
ACXMD
ADVLN
AENEX
AFFNX
AFOST
AFTJW
AGAMA
AHMUE
AKRWK
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ASPBG
AVWKF
CGR
CUY
CVF
DU5
EBS
ECM
EIF
EJD
F5P
FDB
FEDTE
HVGLF
HZ~
JDP
L7B
NPM
O9-
P2P
RIG
SBF
SDK
SES
SHL
X7M
ZGI
ZXP
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-e341t-24aa7ed8d9a18cacf71a9eef6b6f4c43a4a660a673f991fe531457ab816e2d112
IEDL.DBID 7X8
ISICitedReferencesCount 65
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000280613100025&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 1875-7855
IngestDate Mon Aug 25 04:31:56 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 05:36:42 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-e341t-24aa7ed8d9a18cacf71a9eef6b6f4c43a4a660a673f991fe531457ab816e2d112
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PMID 19818911
PQID 734081336
PQPubID 23479
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_734081336
pubmed_primary_19818911
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2009-00-00
20090101
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2009-01-01
PublicationDate_xml – year: 2009
  text: 2009-00-00
PublicationDecade 2000
PublicationPlace Netherlands
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Netherlands
PublicationTitle Progress in brain research
PublicationTitleAlternate Prog Brain Res
PublicationYear 2009
SSID ssj0027904
Score 2.1852565
SecondaryResourceType review_article
Snippet Pain management in severely brain-damaged patients constitutes a clinical and ethical stake. At the bedside, assessing the presence of pain and suffering is...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage 329
SubjectTerms Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Attitude of Health Personnel
Culture
Europe
Female
Health Personnel - psychology
Health Surveys
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Middle Aged
Pain - diagnosis
Pain - etiology
Pain - psychology
Persistent Vegetative State - complications
Positron-Emission Tomography
Young Adult
Title Different beliefs about pain perception in the vegetative and minimally conscious states: a European survey of medical and paramedical professionals
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19818911
https://www.proquest.com/docview/734081336
Volume 177
WOSCitedRecordID wos000280613100025&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV07TxwxELZ4pKABAgnhkWiKCCWFxXm9Z3tpEEqCaHKiAOm606wfEdLd3oY9Trr_wQ9m7N0DGkRBs5ILW-vXzDczn2cY-55p2tUyC9xq5zhJScmNkwTk0GA_IJljiKnYhB4MzHBYXHXcnKajVS5lYhLUbmqjj_xEy5y0l5TqrP7PY9GoGFztKmissnVJSCYyuvTQPNtbRaoeKAiSc236_ecHPPGBsC54TD3yo1f8FAQxMy5eB5lJ2VxsvfM3t9lmhzLhvD0WH9mKr3bY7nlFFvZkAceQeJ_Job7LHn53NVJmUHpCpKGBxFaGGm8rqJ-IL0AtQosw9_8SRXHuASsHMTfJBMfjBZBlTfp0et9AeqXUnALC0tkPzf3d3C9gGmDShoZS55h4fNmuXyQJaT6xm4s_178ueVergXvSgzOe5YjaO-MKFMaiDVpg4X1QpQq5zSXmqFQPlZaBEGnwdPXzvsbSCOUzR6DvM1urppX_wiBmzCejSpEotrk1qjDC-mCFLHPX01bsM1gu_YjuQgxwYOVpdqOnxd9ne-32jeo2Z8dI0CiGBPvB250P2UYbMop-liO2HmjW_iv7YOez2-buWzpj9B1c_X0E-YreMA
linkProvider ProQuest
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Different+beliefs+about+pain+perception+in+the+vegetative+and+minimally+conscious+states%3A+a+European+survey+of+medical+and+paramedical+professionals&rft.jtitle=Progress+in+brain+research&rft.au=Demertzi%2C+A&rft.au=Schnakers%2C+C&rft.au=Ledoux%2C+D&rft.au=Chatelle%2C+C&rft.date=2009-01-01&rft.issn=1875-7855&rft.eissn=1875-7855&rft.volume=177&rft.spage=329&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2FS0079-6123%2809%2917722-1&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1875-7855&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1875-7855&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1875-7855&client=summon