Gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) resource selection within a private working pine (Pinus spp.) forest landscape

•The strongest predictor of selection was distance to permanently open areas.•Selection was greatest proximate to permanently open areas.•Elevation and suitable soils were the second strongest predictors of selection. Private working forest landscapes provide wildlife habitat and understanding how s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Forest ecology and management Jg. 510
Hauptverfasser: Marshall, Craig D., Maerz, John C., Larsen-Gray, Angela L., Chamberlain, Michael J., Martin, James A.
Format: Journal Article
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: Elsevier B.V 15.04.2022
Schlagworte:
ISSN:0378-1127, 1872-7042
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Abstract •The strongest predictor of selection was distance to permanently open areas.•Selection was greatest proximate to permanently open areas.•Elevation and suitable soils were the second strongest predictors of selection. Private working forest landscapes provide wildlife habitat and understanding how species interact with these landscapes is critical to identifying conservation opportunities. The gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus; hereafter, tortoise) is a species endemic to the Coastal Plain ecoregion of the southeastern United States, with private working pine (Pinus spp.) forests encompassing a substantive portion of area within the species’ range. Although private working pine forests contain tortoises, uncertainty exists about how tortoises use these landscapes. Specifically, there is limited information regarding tortoise habitat associations within these landscapes relative to current forest management practices. Therefore, we used radio telemetry data from 55 adult tortoises collected over 3 years to estimate resource selection within a private working forest landscape dominated by planted loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) stands in the Upper Coastal Plain ecoregion of Georgia, USA. The strongest predictor of resource selection by tortoises was proximity to permanently open areas, specifically a utility right-of-way and areas adjacent to unpaved forest roads and, to a lesser extent, areas of higher elevation containing soils suitable for tortoises. On our study area, we identified permanently open areas as an important landscape component to adult tortoises. Although adult tortoises persist within these landscapes, more work is needed to understand tortoise recruitment in private working pine forest landscapes.
AbstractList Private working forest landscapes provide wildlife habitat and understanding how species interact with these landscapes is critical to identifying conservation opportunities. The gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus; hereafter, tortoise) is a species endemic to the Coastal Plain ecoregion of the southeastern United States, with private working pine (Pinus spp.) forests encompassing a substantive portion of area within the species’ range. Although private working pine forests contain tortoises, uncertainty exists about how tortoises use these landscapes. Specifically, there is limited information regarding tortoise habitat associations within these landscapes relative to current forest management practices. Therefore, we used radio telemetry data from 55 adult tortoises collected over 3 years to estimate resource selection within a private working forest landscape dominated by planted loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) stands in the Upper Coastal Plain ecoregion of Georgia, USA. The strongest predictor of resource selection by tortoises was proximity to permanently open areas, specifically a utility right-of-way and areas adjacent to unpaved forest roads and, to a lesser extent, areas of higher elevation containing soils suitable for tortoises. On our study area, we identified permanently open areas as an important landscape component to adult tortoises. Although adult tortoises persist within these landscapes, more work is needed to understand tortoise recruitment in private working pine forest landscapes.
•The strongest predictor of selection was distance to permanently open areas.•Selection was greatest proximate to permanently open areas.•Elevation and suitable soils were the second strongest predictors of selection. Private working forest landscapes provide wildlife habitat and understanding how species interact with these landscapes is critical to identifying conservation opportunities. The gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus; hereafter, tortoise) is a species endemic to the Coastal Plain ecoregion of the southeastern United States, with private working pine (Pinus spp.) forests encompassing a substantive portion of area within the species’ range. Although private working pine forests contain tortoises, uncertainty exists about how tortoises use these landscapes. Specifically, there is limited information regarding tortoise habitat associations within these landscapes relative to current forest management practices. Therefore, we used radio telemetry data from 55 adult tortoises collected over 3 years to estimate resource selection within a private working forest landscape dominated by planted loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) stands in the Upper Coastal Plain ecoregion of Georgia, USA. The strongest predictor of resource selection by tortoises was proximity to permanently open areas, specifically a utility right-of-way and areas adjacent to unpaved forest roads and, to a lesser extent, areas of higher elevation containing soils suitable for tortoises. On our study area, we identified permanently open areas as an important landscape component to adult tortoises. Although adult tortoises persist within these landscapes, more work is needed to understand tortoise recruitment in private working pine forest landscapes.
ArticleNumber 120112
Author Marshall, Craig D.
Larsen-Gray, Angela L.
Martin, James A.
Chamberlain, Michael J.
Maerz, John C.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Craig D.
  surname: Marshall
  fullname: Marshall, Craig D.
  email: cmarsh@iastate.edu
  organization: Warnell School of Forest and Natural Resources, University of Georgia, 180 E. Green Street, Athens, GA 30602, United States
– sequence: 2
  givenname: John C.
  surname: Maerz
  fullname: Maerz, John C.
  organization: Warnell School of Forest and Natural Resources, University of Georgia, 180 E. Green Street, Athens, GA 30602, United States
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Angela L.
  surname: Larsen-Gray
  fullname: Larsen-Gray, Angela L.
  organization: National Council for Air and Stream Improvement, Inc., 4000 Derring Hall, Blacksburg, VA 24060, United States
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Michael J.
  surname: Chamberlain
  fullname: Chamberlain, Michael J.
  organization: Warnell School of Forest and Natural Resources, University of Georgia, 180 E. Green Street, Athens, GA 30602, United States
– sequence: 5
  givenname: James A.
  surname: Martin
  fullname: Martin, James A.
  organization: Warnell School of Forest and Natural Resources, University of Georgia, 180 E. Green Street, Athens, GA 30602, United States
BookMark eNotkMFKxDAURYOM4Dj6By6ydBatSdok7UYQ0VEQdKHr0EleNWMnqUmq-PdmqKv3uFwuh3OKFs47QOiCkpISKq52Ze8DaF8ywlhJGaGUHaElbSQrJKnZAi1JJZsix_IEnca4I4RwXjdLlDZ-_ICAkw_J2wj4cg6miEc__OZ3P8U1DhD9FDTgCAPoZL3DPzZ9WIc7PAb73SXAPz58WveOR-vyzIt1eSOOY7nGB7qY8NA5E3U3whk67rshwvn_XaG3-7vX24fi6XnzeHvzVACrq1SYngvYtqI1YKqt5q3YNrWsDRFtLaUwctvVgnDKuez7TjMGje45a7kkQOvKVCt0Oe-OwX9NGUHtbdQwZBDwU1RMSM6FIILn6vVchczzbSGoqC04DcZms0kZbxUl6qBb7dSsWx10q1l39Qdzl3mK
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2022 The Authors
Copyright_xml – notice: 2022 The Authors
DBID 6I.
AAFTH
7S9
L.6
DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120112
DatabaseName ScienceDirect Open Access Titles
Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
DatabaseTitle AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
DatabaseTitleList AGRICOLA

DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Biology
Forestry
EISSN 1872-7042
ExternalDocumentID S0378112722001062
GroupedDBID --K
--M
.~1
0R~
1B1
1RT
1~.
1~5
4.4
457
4G.
53G
5GY
5VS
6I.
7-5
71M
8P~
9JM
AABNK
AABVA
AACTN
AAEDW
AAFTH
AAIAV
AAIKJ
AAKOC
AALRI
AAOAW
AAQFI
AATLK
AAXUO
ABFNM
ABFRF
ABFYP
ABGRD
ABJNI
ABLST
ABMAC
ABYKQ
ACDAQ
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACIUM
ACRLP
ADBBV
ADEZE
ADQTV
AEBSH
AEFWE
AEKER
AENEX
AEQOU
AFKWA
AFTJW
AFXIZ
AGUBO
AGYEJ
AHEUO
AHHHB
AIEXJ
AIKHN
AITUG
AJOXV
AKIFW
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMFUW
AMRAJ
AXJTR
BKOJK
BLECG
BLXMC
CBWCG
CS3
DU5
EBS
EFJIC
EFLBG
EO8
EO9
EP2
EP3
F5P
FDB
FIRID
FNPLU
FYGXN
G-Q
GBLVA
IHE
J1W
KCYFY
KOM
LW9
LY9
M41
MO0
N9A
N~3
O-L
O9-
OAUVE
OZT
P-8
P-9
P2P
PC.
Q38
ROL
RPZ
SAB
SCC
SDF
SDG
SDP
SES
SPCBC
SSA
SSJ
SSZ
T5K
WH7
Y6R
~02
~G-
~KM
7S9
AAHBH
AATTM
AAXKI
ACLOT
ACVFH
ADCNI
AEIPS
AEUPX
AFPUW
AIGII
AIIUN
AKBMS
AKRWK
AKYEP
ANKPU
APXCP
EFKBS
L.6
~HD
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-e243t-df56eb969ded3bc596b8474d0694776d7ba46051557ffac22e8cf529570e143d3
ISICitedReferencesCount 3
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000783076400004&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 0378-1127
IngestDate Sun Nov 09 04:34:47 EST 2025
Fri Feb 23 02:40:17 EST 2024
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Keywords Pinus taeda
Southeastern United States
Forest management
Loblolly pine
Georgia
Language English
License This is an open access article under the CC BY license.
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-e243t-df56eb969ded3bc596b8474d0694776d7ba46051557ffac22e8cf529570e143d3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120112
PQID 2675566065
PQPubID 24069
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_2675566065
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_foreco_2022_120112
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2022-04-15
20220415
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2022-04-15
PublicationDate_xml – month: 04
  year: 2022
  text: 2022-04-15
  day: 15
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationTitle Forest ecology and management
PublicationYear 2022
Publisher Elsevier B.V
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier B.V
References Duffie (b0050) 2020
Fox, T.R., Jokela, E.J., Allen, H.L., 2004. The evolution of pine plantation silviculture in the southern United States. Pages 63-82
Oswalt, S.N., W.B. Smith, P.D. Miles, Pugh, S.A., 2019. Forest resources of the United States, 2017: A technical document supporting the Forest Service 2020 update of the RPA Assessment. U.S. Department of Agricultural General Technical Report WO-97, Forest Service, Washington, DC.
Elmore, Miller, Vilella (b0060) 2004; 199
Soil Survey Staff, 2020. Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture. Web Soil Survey.
General Technical Report SRS-75. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station. Asheville, USA.
Rautsaw, Martin, Lanctot, Vincent, Bolt, Seigel, Parkinson (b0195) 2018; 52
Greene, Iglay, Evans, Wigley, Miller (b0090) 2019; 432
Jones, Dorr (b0125) 2004; 32
Underwood, Ober, Miller, Munn (b0210) 2012; 49
Accessed 27 Jan 2022.
Muff, Signer, Fieberg, Wal (b0160) 2020; 89
Yager, Hinderliter, Heise, Epperson (b0225) 2007; 71
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 2021. Southern Regional Climate Center, Climate Normals.
Foggia, J.R., 2015. Implications of stand adjacency and edge for birds in a managed forest ecosystem. Thesis, Mississippi State University, Starkville, USA.
Iglay, Leopold, Miller (b0115) 2014; 328
Diemer (b0045) 1992; 26
]
Northrup, Hooten, Anderson, Wittemyer (b0170) 2013; 94
Accessed 16 Feb 2021.
QGIS Development Team, 2020 QGIS Geographic Information System. Open Source Geospatial Foundation Project.
Hermann, Guyer, Hardin Waddle, Greg Nelms (b0105) 2002; 108
Wigley, Hedman, Loehle, Register, Poirier, Durfield (b0220) 2012; 36
U.S. Geological Survey, 2022. State Wildlife Action Plans (SWAP).
management in Georgia. Thesis, University of Georgia, Athens, USA.
Plummer, M., 2003. JAGS: A program for analysis of Bayesian graphical models using Gibbs sampling.
Leban, Wisdom, Garton, Johnson, Kie (b0145) 2001
Greene, Tuberville, Chamberlain, Miller, Wigley, Martin (b0100) 2020; 44
Castellón, Anderson, Rothermel, Beck (b0025) 2020; 108
Diemer Berish, Kiltie, Thomas (b0040) 2012; 11
Johnson (b0120) 1980; 61
Accessed 11 Dec 2020.
Greene, Iglay, Evans, Miller, Wigley, Riffell (b0085) 2016; 360
.
R Core Team, 2020. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria.
Kowal, Schmolke, Kanagaraj, Bruggeman (b0135) 2014; 53
Demarais, Verschuyl, Roloff, Miller, Wigley (b0035) 2017; 385
Tuberville, Buhlmann, Balbach, Bennett, Nestor, Gibbons, Sharitz (b0205) 2007
Aresco, Guyer (b0005) 1999; 63
Ashton, Engelhardt, Branciforte (b0010) 2008; 42
Baskaran, Dale, Efroymson, Birkhead (b0015) 2006; 155
Marshall, C.M., 2021. Gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) ecology within a private, working forest landscape. Dissertation, Athens, USA.
Greene, Evans, Gray, Jones-Farrand, Wathen (b0095) 2020; 118
Miller, Wigley, Miller (b0155) 2009; 107
Hunt, J.D., 2014. Improving monitoring and habitat assessments for gopher frogs
Gillies, Hebblewhite, Nielsen, Krawchuk, Aldridge, Friar, Saher, Stevens, Jerde (b0080) 2006; 75
Knight (b0130) 1999; 13
References_xml – volume: 328
  start-page: 69
  year: 2014
  end-page: 78
  ident: b0115
  article-title: Vegetation responses to fire and herbicide in intensively managed, mid-rotation pine
  publication-title: For. Ecol. Manage.
– year: 2007
  ident: b0205
  article-title: Habitat selection by the gopher tortoise (
– volume: 26
  start-page: 281
  year: 1992
  ident: b0045
  article-title: Demography of the tortoise
  publication-title: J. Herpetol.
– volume: 42
  start-page: 523
  year: 2008
  end-page: 529
  ident: b0010
  article-title: Gopher tortoise (
  publication-title: J. Herpetol.
– volume: 108
  start-page: 140
  year: 2020
  end-page: 150
  ident: b0025
  article-title: Differential effects of elevation and microtopography on gopher tortoise burrow distributions in southern Florida
  publication-title: Copeia
– reference: Oswalt, S.N., W.B. Smith, P.D. Miles, Pugh, S.A., 2019. Forest resources of the United States, 2017: A technical document supporting the Forest Service 2020 update of the RPA Assessment. U.S. Department of Agricultural General Technical Report WO-97, Forest Service, Washington, DC.
– volume: 75
  start-page: 887
  year: 2006
  end-page: 898
  ident: b0080
  article-title: Application of random effects to the study of resource selection by animals
  publication-title: J. Anim. Ecol.
– volume: 13
  start-page: 223
  year: 1999
  end-page: 224
  ident: b0130
  article-title: Private lands: the neglected geography
  publication-title: Conserv. Biol.
– volume: 11
  start-page: 50
  year: 2012
  end-page: 58
  ident: b0040
  article-title: Long-term population dynamics of gopher tortoises (Gopherus polyphemus) in a pine plantation in northern Florida
  publication-title: Chelonian Conservation Biol.
– volume: 108
  start-page: 289
  year: 2002
  end-page: 298
  ident: b0105
  article-title: Sampling on private property to evaluate population status and effects of land use practices on the gopher tortoise,
  publication-title: Biol. Conserv.
– reference: General Technical Report SRS-75. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station. Asheville, USA.
– volume: 52
  start-page: 136
  year: 2018
  end-page: 144
  ident: b0195
  article-title: On the road again: assessing the use of roadsides as wildlife corridors for gopher tortoises (
  publication-title: J. Herpetol.
– reference: QGIS Development Team, 2020 QGIS Geographic Information System. Open Source Geospatial Foundation Project.
– reference: Foggia, J.R., 2015. Implications of stand adjacency and edge for birds in a managed forest ecosystem. Thesis, Mississippi State University, Starkville, USA.
– reference: . Accessed 11 Dec 2020.
– volume: 360
  start-page: 30
  year: 2016
  end-page: 39
  ident: b0085
  article-title: A meta-analysis of biodiversity responses to management of southeastern pine forests—opportunities for open pine conservation
  publication-title: For. Ecol. Manage.
– reference: Hunt, J.D., 2014. Improving monitoring and habitat assessments for gopher frogs (
– volume: 155
  start-page: 335
  year: 2006
  end-page: 351
  ident: b0015
  article-title: Habitat modeling within a regional context: An example using gopher tortoise
  publication-title: Am. Midl. Nat.
– reference: ]
– reference: ) management in Georgia. Thesis, University of Georgia, Athens, USA.
– reference: Marshall, C.M., 2021. Gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) ecology within a private, working forest landscape. Dissertation, Athens, USA.
– volume: 118
  start-page: 28
  year: 2020
  end-page: 43
  ident: b0095
  article-title: Using a coproduction approach to map future forest retention likelihood in the southeastern United States
  publication-title: J. Forest.
– volume: 199
  start-page: 11
  year: 2004
  end-page: 20
  ident: b0060
  article-title: Selection of diurnal roosts by red bats (
  publication-title: For. Ecol. Manage.
– volume: 63
  start-page: 26
  year: 1999
  ident: b0005
  article-title: Burrow abandonment by gopher tortoises in slash pine plantations of the Conecuh National Forest
  publication-title: J. Wildl. Manage.
– reference: U.S. Geological Survey, 2022. State Wildlife Action Plans (SWAP).
– reference: [
– reference: Plummer, M., 2003. JAGS: A program for analysis of Bayesian graphical models using Gibbs sampling.
– year: 2020
  ident: b0050
  article-title: Conservation and coexistence of a federally listed species within a landscape highly modified for commodity production: gopher tortoise (
– volume: 32
  start-page: 456
  year: 2004
  end-page: 464
  ident: b0125
  article-title: Habitat associations of gopher tortoise burrows on industrial timberlands
  publication-title: Wildl. Soc. Bull.
– volume: 36
  start-page: 38
  year: 2012
  end-page: 43
  ident: b0220
  article-title: Density of gopher tortoise burrows on commercial forestland in Alabama and Mississippi
  publication-title: South. J. Appl. For.
– volume: 53
  start-page: 594
  year: 2014
  end-page: 605
  ident: b0135
  article-title: Resource selection probability functions for gopher tortoise: Providing a management tool applicable across the species’ range
  publication-title: Environ. Manage.
– volume: 71
  start-page: 428
  year: 2007
  end-page: 434
  ident: b0225
  article-title: Gopher tortoise response to habitat management by prescribed burning
  publication-title: J. Wildl. Manage.
– volume: 107
  start-page: 197
  year: 2009
  end-page: 203
  ident: b0155
  article-title: Managed forests and conservation of terrestrial biodiversity in the southern United States
  publication-title: J. Forest.
– volume: 94
  start-page: 1456
  year: 2013
  end-page: 1463
  ident: b0170
  article-title: Practical guidance on characterizing availability in resource selection functions under a use-availability design
  publication-title: Ecology
– volume: 385
  start-page: 308
  year: 2017
  end-page: 330
  ident: b0035
  article-title: Tamm review: Terrestrial vertebrate biodiversity and intensive forest management in the U.S
  publication-title: For. Ecol. Manage.
– reference: .
– volume: 49
  start-page: 846
  year: 2012
  end-page: 854
  ident: b0210
  article-title: Contributions of private landowners to the conservation of the gopher tortoise (
  publication-title: Environ. Manage.
– reference: . Accessed 27 Jan 2022.
– volume: 44
  start-page: 49
  year: 2020
  end-page: 56
  ident: b0100
  article-title: A review of gopher tortoise demography and movements in production pine forest landscapes
  publication-title: Wildl. Soc. Bull.
– start-page: 291
  year: 2001
  end-page: 307
  ident: b0145
  article-title: Effect of sample size on the performance of resource selection analyses
  publication-title: Radio tracking and animal populations
– volume: 89
  start-page: 80
  year: 2020
  end-page: 92
  ident: b0160
  article-title: Accounting for individual-specific variation in habitat-selection studies: efficient estimation of mixed-effects models using Bayesian or frequentist computation
  publication-title: J. Anim. Ecol.
– volume: 61
  start-page: 65
  year: 1980
  end-page: 71
  ident: b0120
  article-title: The comparison of usage and availability measurements for evaluating resource preference
  publication-title: Ecology
– reference: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 2021. Southern Regional Climate Center, Climate Normals.
– reference: . Accessed 16 Feb 2021.
– reference: R Core Team, 2020. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria.
– volume: 432
  start-page: 200
  year: 2019
  end-page: 208
  ident: b0090
  article-title: Estimating capacity of managed pine forests in the southeastern U.S. to provide open pine woodland condition and gopher tortoise habitat
  publication-title: For. Ecol. Manage.
– reference: Fox, T.R., Jokela, E.J., Allen, H.L., 2004. The evolution of pine plantation silviculture in the southern United States. Pages 63-82
– reference: Soil Survey Staff, 2020. Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture. Web Soil Survey.
SSID ssj0005548
Score 2.3908372
Snippet •The strongest predictor of selection was distance to permanently open areas.•Selection was greatest proximate to permanently open areas.•Elevation and...
Private working forest landscapes provide wildlife habitat and understanding how species interact with these landscapes is critical to identifying conservation...
SourceID proquest
elsevier
SourceType Aggregation Database
Publisher
SubjectTerms administrative management
adults
coastal plains
coniferous forests
ecoregions
forest ecology
Forest management
Georgia
Gopherus polyphemus
landscapes
Loblolly pine
Pinus taeda
radio telemetry
rights of way
Southeastern United States
tortoises
uncertainty
wildlife habitats
Title Gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) resource selection within a private working pine (Pinus spp.) forest landscape
URI https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120112
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2675566065
Volume 510
WOSCitedRecordID wos000783076400004&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVESC
  databaseName: Elsevier SD Freedom Collection Journals 2021
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1872-7042
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0005548
  issn: 0378-1127
  databaseCode: AIEXJ
  dateStart: 20151001
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.sciencedirect.com
  providerName: Elsevier
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1La9wwEBZL0pZeSpu2NH2hQg8JxsYrP2QfwzZJG9IQaAp7M7IlJw4b72J7Q7a_qj-xM5Ifm-6lLfRijIQlo_kYfTOa0RDyEUjnOHNzz8ZqRbYfuMqOJSjDMM-FilUcxTLVxSb42Vk0ncbno9HPLhfmdsbLMrq7ixf_VdTQBsLG1Nm_EHc_KDTAOwgdniB2eP6R4I_1TQHAKatmXtSaQpqmZY0lGVbwerOs0RtQta57q9bFcBAI6JYtSktYiwrLnildSkYnrLds9LwoYZx6scD8LIxRhF3F0vnCGEm1TnWPTJ_KhluebjZibb6CXY3lXLS_thLFpfXJGfpU9aMLF7YmffspfKNK-7gSKxOSealmwjrt-ydXAquczESxnhhgnTjrHg4wjvEqxWBwu22k3ph0LzR_x-ZiAUcZ7R1xMBdc_556D0zY7MZWYbwW1w6uVIZpoIw5Y6RDbNga-4DFbzgdzsaYtqJh099mPIhhK9g--HI4PRnCigJdsa3_vS5dU8cUbs51jwP9xgY0xbl4Sp60tgk9MJh6Rkaq3CEPTbXS1Q55ZCRarZ6TxiCKdiCjex3E6ACxfdoBjPYAowZgVNAWYLQFGEWA0T0NL4rw2qcGXLQH1wvy_ejwYvLZbut32Ir5XmPLPAhVGoexVNJLsyAOU-BCvsRca85DyVOBp_LAaDlohowxFWU5HjxzVwGNl95LslXOS_WKUOnJKI3yUAmgk5kIUxWARpF-kIGBk7reLuHdMiYtdTSUMAFxJ10k43ViBJCgABIjgF3yoVv1BDQrHpeJUs2XdcLAlgZjBzj6638e_Q15PCD6LdlqqqV6Rx5kt01RV-9b7PwCFcmkEw
linkProvider Elsevier
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Gopher+tortoise+%28Gopherus+polyphemus%29+resource+selection+within+a+private+working+pine+%28Pinus+spp.%29+forest+landscape&rft.jtitle=Forest+ecology+and+management&rft.au=Marshall%2C+Craig+D.&rft.au=Maerz%2C+John+C.&rft.au=Larsen-Gray%2C+Angela+L.&rft.au=Chamberlain%2C+Michael+J.&rft.date=2022-04-15&rft.pub=Elsevier+B.V&rft.issn=0378-1127&rft.eissn=1872-7042&rft.volume=510&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.foreco.2022.120112&rft.externalDocID=S0378112722001062
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0378-1127&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0378-1127&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0378-1127&client=summon