Comparative studies of value orientations: potential, limitations, and the logic of development
The article presents an attempt to identify the current status of the comparative (or cross-cultural) studies in the sociological tradition by indicating basic contexts of discussing relevant issues in the sociological discourse. First, there is a quite ambiguous categorical apparatus of the compara...
Uloženo v:
| Vydáno v: | Vestnik Rossijskogo universiteta družby narodov. Seriâ Sociologiâ Ročník 15; číslo 4; s. 159 - 172 |
|---|---|
| Hlavní autoři: | , |
| Médium: | Journal Article |
| Jazyk: | angličtina ruština |
| Vydáno: |
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
01.12.2015
|
| Témata: | |
| ISSN: | 2313-2272, 2408-8897 |
| On-line přístup: | Získat plný text |
| Tagy: |
Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
|
| Abstract | The article presents an attempt to identify the current status of the comparative (or cross-cultural) studies in the sociological tradition by indicating basic contexts of discussing relevant issues in the sociological discourse. First, there is a quite ambiguous categorical apparatus of the comparative analysis even at the level of the key nominations of the subject of cross-cultural studies (the ratio of in-country and cross-country comparisons, of regional, socio-cultural, socio-economic and other aspects in the structure and size of the population, samples and sub-samples, survey techniques, etc.). Second, the history of comparative studies is highly fragmented due to the lack of a coherent tradition and a variety of bright methodological principles and techniques, which experienced modifications at the stages of collection and analysis of empirical data (especially due to the need to take into account differences in the subsamples’ worldviews and to avoid systematic biases that generate differences in data instead of measuring the existing ones). Third, there is a variety of attempts to structure the field of comparative studies on various grounds, which often leads to the opposite result - even more confusion in nominations. Finally, there are recognized since the formation of the comparative research orientation in sociology but still unresolved (partly non-resolvable in principle) problems of ensuring the equivalence of data, primarily with the standardized conceptualization and operationalization of the basic concepts of the project and use of a single method of sampling, data collection and analysis. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | The article presents an attempt to identify the current status of the comparative (or cross-cultural) studies in the sociological tradition by indicating basic contexts of discussing relevant issues in the sociological discourse. First, there is a quite ambiguous categorical apparatus of the comparative analysis even at the level of the key nominations of the subject of cross-cultural studies (the ratio of in-country and cross-country comparisons, of regional, socio-cultural, socio-economic and other aspects in the structure and size of the population, samples and sub-samples, survey techniques, etc.). Second, the history of comparative studies is highly fragmented due to the lack of a coherent tradition and a variety of bright methodological principles and techniques, which experienced modifications at the stages of collection and analysis of empirical data (especially due to the need to take into account differences in the subsamples’ worldviews and to avoid systematic biases that generate differences in data instead of measuring the existing ones). Third, there is a variety of attempts to structure the field of comparative studies on various grounds, which often leads to the opposite result - even more confusion in nominations. Finally, there are recognized since the formation of the comparative research orientation in sociology but still unresolved (partly non-resolvable in principle) problems of ensuring the equivalence of data, primarily with the standardized conceptualization and operationalization of the basic concepts of the project and use of a single method of sampling, data collection and analysis. |
| Author | E A Savelieva I V Trotsuk |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 fullname: I V Trotsuk organization: <p>Российский университет дружбы народов</p> – sequence: 2 fullname: E A Savelieva organization: <p>Российский университет дружбы народов</p> |
| BookMark | eNotTMtOwzAQtFCRKKX_4A9oJD9jhxuqeFSqxAXO0cbeFFdOHCVuJP6eAL3M7Dx27smqTz3ekLVQzBbWVma13JLLQggj7sh2ms6MMcG4NFquSb1P3QAj5DAjnfLFB5xoaukM8YI0jQH7vISpnx7pkPKiAsQdjaELV39Hofc0fyGN6RTc77PHGWMauqX9QG5biBNur7whny_PH_u34vj-etg_HQvPNc-FUqYVFXLNXOkbXjaGeYHaLQhaGFDScFmVjeDWKFe1iOg9M6UQFqwqhdyQw_-uT3CuhzF0MH7XCUL9Z6TxVMOYg4tYGyVQWau9kE4x52wD2GolS9ZyjsDkD0o_YPs |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| DBID | DOA |
| DatabaseName | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
| DatabaseTitleList | |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Sociology & Social History |
| EISSN | 2408-8897 |
| EndPage | 172 |
| ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_742e4885d23c40cc8baef54360f11ea0 |
| GroupedDBID | ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS GROUPED_DOAJ IPNFZ RIG |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-d151t-447f29e150c6db16b70d2e5c0d2a527a4371396b21874c9feeedd076228a84623 |
| IEDL.DBID | DOA |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 1 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000450059000013&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 2313-2272 |
| IngestDate | Fri Oct 03 12:44:17 EDT 2025 |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 4 |
| Language | English Russian |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-d151t-447f29e150c6db16b70d2e5c0d2a527a4371396b21874c9feeedd076228a84623 |
| OpenAccessLink | https://doaj.org/article/742e4885d23c40cc8baef54360f11ea0 |
| PageCount | 14 |
| ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_742e4885d23c40cc8baef54360f11ea0 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2015-12-01 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2015-12-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 12 year: 2015 text: 2015-12-01 day: 01 |
| PublicationDecade | 2010 |
| PublicationTitle | Vestnik Rossijskogo universiteta družby narodov. Seriâ Sociologiâ |
| PublicationYear | 2015 |
| Publisher | Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University) |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University) |
| SSID | ssj0002013753 |
| Score | 1.9388633 |
| Snippet | The article presents an attempt to identify the current status of the comparative (or cross-cultural) studies in the sociological tradition by indicating basic... |
| SourceID | doaj |
| SourceType | Open Website |
| StartPage | 159 |
| SubjectTerms | качественный и количественный подходы кросс-культурные исследования методики измерения проблемы сравнительного анализа в социологии сравнительные исследования ценности ценностные ориентации эквивалентность данных |
| Title | Comparative studies of value orientations: potential, limitations, and the logic of development |
| URI | https://doaj.org/article/742e4885d23c40cc8baef54360f11ea0 |
| Volume | 15 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos000450059000013&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVAON databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals customDbUrl: eissn: 2408-8897 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0002013753 issn: 2313-2272 databaseCode: DOA dateStart: 20080101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.doaj.org/ providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1LSwMxEA5SPHgRn2h9kIN4anA3yW423rRYPEjxoNDbkidUym5pV8F_7yRZbG9evOQQ9gH5lpnvY2e-Qegm5GQlNCOWVyBQDKdEO14Sbh3ESV_AGqeWvIjptJrN5OvWqK9QE5bsgdPB3YF0c_CRFZYywzNjKq2cLzgrM5_nTkW1ngm5JaY-4u-1nCULSuAvjFAaHIC3TPlj9pgcoP2e9uGH9LpDtOOaIzT87RbBtzj1yeJk2_F9jOrxxpcbr1O1H249Du7cDrered801Kzv8bLtQtGPWozwIjQspf0RVo3FQPBwjG_hZrspETpB75Ont_Ez6achEAtZuSOcC0-lAwJnSqvzUovMUlcYWFVBheIM9KYsNQ1T9oz0DrKfzSDW0UoByaDsFA2atnFnCAvQXIblPnA7rjNX2XAZ09IrWebWnqPHcFT1Mhle1MGCOm4AMHUPTP0XMMP_eMgF2gMoi1Q_cokG3erTXaFd89XN16vriPkPmZezRA |
| linkProvider | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative+studies+of+value+orientations%3A+potential%2C+limitations%2C+and+the+logic+of+development&rft.jtitle=Vestnik+Rossijskogo+universiteta+dru%C5%BEby+narodov.+Seri%C3%A2+Sociologi%C3%A2&rft.au=I+V+Trotsuk&rft.au=E+A+Savelieva&rft.date=2015-12-01&rft.pub=Peoples%E2%80%99+Friendship+University+of+Russia+%28RUDN+University%29&rft.issn=2313-2272&rft.eissn=2408-8897&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=159&rft.epage=172&rft.externalDBID=DOA&rft.externalDocID=oai_doaj_org_article_742e4885d23c40cc8baef54360f11ea0 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2313-2272&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2313-2272&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2313-2272&client=summon |