Newton-type algorithms for inverse optimization: weighted bottleneck Hamming distance and $$\ell _\infty$$-norm objectives

In inverse optimization problems, we are given a feasible solution to an underlying optimization problem, and the goal is to modify the problem parameters so that the given input solution becomes optimal. In the minimum-cost setting, the underlying optimization problem is endowed with a linear cost...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Optimization letters Ročník 19; číslo 8; s. 1665 - 1690
Hlavní autoři: Bérczi, Kristóf, Mendoza-Cadena, Lydia Mirabel, Varga, Kitti
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: 01.11.2025
ISSN:1862-4472, 1862-4480
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:In inverse optimization problems, we are given a feasible solution to an underlying optimization problem, and the goal is to modify the problem parameters so that the given input solution becomes optimal. In the minimum-cost setting, the underlying optimization problem is endowed with a linear cost function, and the goal is to modify the costs by a small deviation vector so that the input solution becomes optimal. The difference between the new and the original cost functions can be measured in several ways. In this paper, we focus on two objectives: the weighted bottleneck Hamming distance and the weighted $$\ell _{\infty }$$ ℓ ∞ -norm. We consider a general model in which the coordinates of the deviation vector are required to fall within given lower and upper bounds. For the weighted bottleneck Hamming distance objective, we present a simple, purely combinatorial algorithm that determines an optimal deviation vector in strongly polynomial time. For the weighted $$\ell _{\infty }$$ ℓ ∞ -norm objective, we give a min-max characterization for the optimal solution, and provide a pseudo-polynomial algorithm for finding an optimal deviation vector that runs in strongly polynomial time in the case of unit weights. For both objectives, we assume that an algorithm with the same time complexity for solving the underlying combinatorial optimization problem is available.
ISSN:1862-4472
1862-4480
DOI:10.1007/s11590-024-02183-0