Sen on Open and Closed Impartiality
In this article, I will rebut Amartya Sen's arguments that John Rawls's political philosophy gives us a form of closed rather than open impartiality. I will argue that there is plenty of room within Rawls's own theory of justice to accommodate the requirements of open impartiality. I...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Theoria (Pietermaritzburg) Vol. 72; no. 184; pp. 23 - 42 |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
01.09.2025
|
| ISSN: | 0040-5817, 1558-5816 |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Abstract | In this article, I will rebut Amartya Sen's arguments that John Rawls's political philosophy gives us a form of closed rather than open impartiality. I will argue that there is plenty of room within Rawls's own theory of justice to accommodate the requirements of open impartiality. I will appeal to the way the original position is used in public reason and the method of reflective equilibrium to defend Rawls. Given the way that it fits into Rawls's broader theory, the original position should not be construed as a form of closed impartiality, doomed to be infected unduly by parochial cultural values. Rawls's contractualism is more defensible and versatile than Sen envisions. Some elements of Sen's argument have been briefly addressed before, but this article provides the only sustained, systematic treatment of this important issue. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | In this article, I will rebut Amartya Sen's arguments that John Rawls's political philosophy gives us a form of closed rather than open impartiality. I will argue that there is plenty of room within Rawls's own theory of justice to accommodate the requirements of open impartiality. I will appeal to the way the original position is used in public reason and the method of reflective equilibrium to defend Rawls. Given the way that it fits into Rawls's broader theory, the original position should not be construed as a form of closed impartiality, doomed to be infected unduly by parochial cultural values. Rawls's contractualism is more defensible and versatile than Sen envisions. Some elements of Sen's argument have been briefly addressed before, but this article provides the only sustained, systematic treatment of this important issue. |
| Author | Elmore, Benjamin |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Benjamin orcidid: 0000-0003-4734-2692 surname: Elmore fullname: Elmore, Benjamin |
| BookMark | eNotj7lqw0AURYfgQGTHdVpBasnvza4yiCwGg4u4H0azYBlZEho1_vtYxNW51eWcNVn1Qx8IeUMoGUq1m88lBSpKRVFzoE8kQyF0ITTKFckAOCxbvZB1ShcAZMhoRt5_Q58PfX4c77S9z-tuSMHn--top7m1XTvfXslztF0K2wc35PT1eap_isPxe19_HAqnkRZW2CoA9dEHLaVueBTOcSsbz6NEJR1XwK3gSnsGvoqVlpWr7q6NBcQQ2Ibs_m_dNKQ0hWjGqb3a6WYQzJJo5rNZEs0jkf0BvXFEiQ |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION |
| DOI | 10.3167/th.2025.7218402 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef |
| DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Social Sciences (General) |
| EISSN | 1558-5816 |
| EndPage | 42 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 10_3167_th_2025_7218402 |
| GroupedDBID | 0R~ 29Q 3D0 3LD AAYXX ABDBF ABJNI ACREJ ADAAO ADMHG AEGXH AELGQ AHIZY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS CITATION CS3 EAP ESI ESX FRS GROUPED_DOAJ H13 HZ~ IAO IEA ILR IOF ISE O9- OK1 P2P QN7 RBG RWL RXW TAE TN5 V8K |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c812-a5a9e02dfde8668b4f5cc4a6bd4f6176c4704a5478d30d9f9869c9184ba011ee3 |
| ISSN | 0040-5817 |
| IngestDate | Sat Nov 29 07:29:02 EST 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 184 |
| Language | English |
| License | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
| LinkModel | OpenURL |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c812-a5a9e02dfde8668b4f5cc4a6bd4f6176c4704a5478d30d9f9869c9184ba011ee3 |
| ORCID | 0000-0003-4734-2692 |
| OpenAccessLink | https://doi.org/10.3167/th.2025.7218402 |
| PageCount | 20 |
| ParticipantIDs | crossref_primary_10_3167_th_2025_7218402 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2025-09-01 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2025-09-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 09 year: 2025 text: 2025-09-01 day: 01 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationTitle | Theoria (Pietermaritzburg) |
| PublicationYear | 2025 |
| References | Rawls, J. (bib6) 1997; 64 Wenar, L. (bib16) 2021 Rawls, J. (bib9) 2005 Boran, I. (bib1) 2004; 38 Golemboski, D. (bib3) 2018; 17 Souza, C. (bib14) 2018 Smith, A. (bib13) 2009 Valentini, L. (bib15) 2011; 27 Sen, A. (bib12) 2009 Clare, J. (bib2) 2010; 29 Rawls, J. (bib8) 1999b Nussbaum, M. C. (bib5) 2015 Rawls, J. (bib7) 1999a Hamilton, L. (bib4) 2019 Sen, A. (bib11) 2002; 99 Scanlon, T. M. (bib10) 2003 |
| References_xml | – year: 1999b ident: bib8 – volume: 27 start-page: 297 issue: 3 year: 2011 ident: bib15 article-title: A Paradigm Shift in Theorizing about Justice? A Critique of Sen – volume: 38 start-page: 333 year: 2004 ident: bib1 article-title: On Distinguishing between Types of Impartiality – volume: 99 start-page: 445 issue: 9 year: 2002 ident: bib11 article-title: Open and Closed Impartiality – year: 2009 ident: bib12 – year: 2005 ident: bib9 – year: 2021 ident: bib16 article-title: John Rawls – volume: 29 start-page: 74 issue: 2 year: 2010 ident: bib2 article-title: Sen and Sensibility – volume: 17 start-page: 174 issue: 2 year: 2018 ident: bib3 article-title: The Impartiality of Smith's Spectator: The Problem of Parochialism and the Possibility of Social Critique – start-page: 139 year: 2003 ident: bib10 article-title: Rawls on Justification – start-page: 1 year: 2015 ident: bib5 article-title: Introduction – start-page: 116 year: 2018 ident: bib14 article-title: Equal Liberty, Reflective Equilibrium and Education: Defending Rawls from Sen's Criticisms – year: 2009 ident: bib13 – year: 2019 ident: bib4 – volume: 64 start-page: 765 issue: 3 year: 1997 ident: bib6 article-title: The Idea of Public Reason Revisited – year: 1999a ident: bib7 |
| SSID | ssj0013132 |
| Score | 2.302126 |
| Snippet | In this article, I will rebut Amartya Sen's arguments that John Rawls's political philosophy gives us a form of closed rather than open impartiality. I will... |
| SourceID | crossref |
| SourceType | Index Database |
| StartPage | 23 |
| Title | Sen on Open and Closed Impartiality |
| Volume | 72 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVAON databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals customDbUrl: eissn: 1558-5816 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0013132 issn: 0040-5817 databaseCode: DOA dateStart: 20210101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.doaj.org/ providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3NS8MwFA86PXgRP3F-EdCDHqpdm6TJUYeiICI4ZLeSr-JkdsNVEf96X9p0KwNBD15KCeXR5Ne-93t5H0HomCmpqbYsAGMNDgpQiEBligZGWxGZTkfJMpvw6S65v-f9vnjwJ2RPyuMEkjznn59i_K9QwxiA7Upn_wD3VCgMwD2ADleAHa6_Av7R5i4C4DJFyshAdziaAKu8dbnm8Ds72t1kpGVx_kA6pvkwKHNjwHsuvlz0pbFLcDWsE3Ivbf4iX32_br9dENFpPtRUBZIwoLwqmDyzXutRV35VFT3WajGJmvBz0tRyccNeVs2x5jWxK7CHlSpcvCeiZ0npSUYzo1MH2uds0TRDEHwTJyItnlMnIPUCFtFSlFAhat-5Dhd14qhOj3Rzq3o4OQHnc2_QoB8NHtFbQ6veAcAXFXDraMHmG6hdVUljr2kn-MS3Az_dREcAKB7l2AGKAVBcAYqbgG6h3vVVr3sT-KMtAg2MKpBUChtGJjOWM8YVyajWRDJlSAaUkmmShES6VmsmDo3IBGdCC5iAkqCPrY23USsf5XYHYcZlJqUyKswYEdIITRNrOTcJsTSmvI1O6gmn46qBSfrD4u7-_tE9tDL7uPZRq3h7twdoWX8Ug8nbYQnON-lNN0Y |
| linkProvider | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sen+on+Open+and+Closed+Impartiality&rft.jtitle=Theoria+%28Pietermaritzburg%29&rft.au=Elmore%2C+Benjamin&rft.date=2025-09-01&rft.issn=0040-5817&rft.eissn=1558-5816&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=184&rft.spage=23&rft.epage=42&rft_id=info:doi/10.3167%2Fth.2025.7218402&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_3167_th_2025_7218402 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0040-5817&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0040-5817&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0040-5817&client=summon |