An Audit and Feedback Intervention for Reducing Antibiotic Prescribing in General Dental Practice: The RAPiD Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial
Dentists prescribe approximately 10% of antibiotics dispensed in UK community pharmacies. Despite clear clinical guidance, dentists often prescribe antibiotics inappropriately. This cluster-randomised controlled trial used routinely collected National Health Service (NHS) dental prescribing and trea...
Uloženo v:
| Vydáno v: | PLoS medicine Ročník 13; číslo 8; s. e1002115 |
|---|---|
| Hlavní autoři: | , , , , , , |
| Médium: | Journal Article |
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Vydáno: |
United States
Public Library of Science
30.08.2016
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| Témata: | |
| ISSN: | 1549-1676, 1549-1277, 1549-1676 |
| On-line přístup: | Získat plný text |
| Tagy: |
Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
|
| Abstract | Dentists prescribe approximately 10% of antibiotics dispensed in UK community pharmacies. Despite clear clinical guidance, dentists often prescribe antibiotics inappropriately. This cluster-randomised controlled trial used routinely collected National Health Service (NHS) dental prescribing and treatment claim data to compare the impact of individualised audit and feedback (A&F) interventions on dentists' antibiotic prescribing rates.
All 795 antibiotic prescribing NHS general dental practices in Scotland were included. Practices were randomised to the control (practices = 163; dentists = 567) or A&F intervention group (practices = 632; dentists = 1,999). A&F intervention practices were allocated to one of two A&F groups: (1) individualised graphical A&F comprising a line graph plotting an individual dentist's monthly antibiotic prescribing rate (practices = 316; dentists = 1,001); or (2) individualised graphical A&F plus a written behaviour change message synthesising and reiterating national guidance recommendations for dental antibiotic prescribing (practices = 316; dentists = 998). Intervention practices were also simultaneously randomised to receive A&F: (i) with or without a health board comparator comprising the addition of a line to the graphical A&F plotting the monthly antibiotic prescribing rate of all dentists in the health board; and (ii) delivered at 0 and 6 mo or at 0, 6, and 9 mo, giving a total of eight intervention groups. The primary outcome, measured by the trial statistician who was blinded to allocation, was the total number of antibiotic items dispensed per 100 NHS treatment claims over the 12 mo post-delivery of the baseline A&F. Primary outcome data was available for 152 control practices (dentists = 438) and 609 intervention practices (dentists = 1,550). At baseline, the number of antibiotic items prescribed per 100 NHS treatment claims was 8.3 in the control group and 8.5 in the intervention group. At follow-up, antibiotic prescribing had decreased by 0.4 antibiotic items per 100 NHS treatment claims in control practices and by 1.0 in intervention practices. This represents a significant reduction (-5.7%; 95% CI -10.2% to -1.1%; p = 0.01) in dentists' prescribing rate in the intervention group relative to the control group. Intervention subgroup analyses found a 6.1% reduction in the antibiotic prescribing rate of dentists who had received the written behaviour change message relative to dentists who had not (95% CI -10.4% to -1.9%; p = 0.01). There was no significant between-group difference in the prescribing rate of dentists who received a health board comparator relative to those who did not (-4.3%; 95% CI -8.6% to 0.1%; p = 0.06), nor between dentists who received A&F at 0 and 6 mo relative to those who received A&F at 0, 6, and 9 mo (0.02%; 95% CI -4.2% to 4.2%; p = 0.99). The key limitations relate to the use of routinely collected datasets which did not allow evaluation of any effects on inappropriate prescribing.
A&F derived from routinely collected datasets led to a significant reduction in the antibiotic prescribing rate of dentists.
Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN49204710. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList |
Background
Dentists prescribe approximately 10% of antibiotics dispensed in UK community pharmacies. Despite clear clinical guidance, dentists often prescribe antibiotics inappropriately. This cluster-randomised controlled trial used routinely collected National Health Service (NHS) dental prescribing and treatment claim data to compare the impact of individualised audit and feedback (A&F) interventions on dentists' antibiotic prescribing rates.
Methods and Findings
All 795 antibiotic prescribing NHS general dental practices in Scotland were included. Practices were randomised to the control (practices = 163; dentists = 567) or A&F intervention group (practices = 632; dentists = 1,999). A&F intervention practices were allocated to one of two A&F groups: (1) individualised graphical A&F comprising a line graph plotting an individual dentist's monthly antibiotic prescribing rate (practices = 316; dentists = 1,001); or (2) individualised graphical A&F plus a written behaviour change message synthesising and reiterating national guidance recommendations for dental antibiotic prescribing (practices = 316; dentists = 998). Intervention practices were also simultaneously randomised to receive A&F: (i) with or without a health board comparator comprising the addition of a line to the graphical A&F plotting the monthly antibiotic prescribing rate of all dentists in the health board; and (ii) delivered at 0 and 6 mo or at 0, 6, and 9 mo, giving a total of eight intervention groups. The primary outcome, measured by the trial statistician who was blinded to allocation, was the total number of antibiotic items dispensed per 100 NHS treatment claims over the 12 mo post-delivery of the baseline A&F. Primary outcome data was available for 152 control practices (dentists = 438) and 609 intervention practices (dentists = 1,550). At baseline, the number of antibiotic items prescribed per 100 NHS treatment claims was 8.3 in the control group and 8.5 in the intervention group. At follow-up, antibiotic prescribing had decreased by 0.4 antibiotic items per 100 NHS treatment claims in control practices and by 1.0 in intervention practices. This represents a significant reduction (-5.7%; 95% CI -10.2% to -1.1%; p = 0.01) in dentists' prescribing rate in the intervention group relative to the control group. Intervention subgroup analyses found a 6.1% reduction in the antibiotic prescribing rate of dentists who had received the written behaviour change message relative to dentists who had not (95% CI -10.4% to -1.9%; p = 0.01). There was no significant between-group difference in the prescribing rate of dentists who received a health board comparator relative to those who did not (-4.3%; 95% CI -8.6% to 0.1%; p = 0.06), nor between dentists who received A&F at 0 and 6 mo relative to those who received A&F at 0, 6, and 9 mo (0.02%; 95% CI -4.2% to 4.2%; p = 0.99). The key limitations relate to the use of routinely collected datasets which did not allow evaluation of any effects on inappropriate prescribing.
Conclusions
A&F derived from routinely collected datasets led to a significant reduction in the antibiotic prescribing rate of dentists.
Trial Registration
Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN49204710 Dentists prescribe approximately 10% of antibiotics dispensed in UK community pharmacies. Despite clear clinical guidance, dentists often prescribe antibiotics inappropriately. This cluster-randomised controlled trial used routinely collected National Health Service (NHS) dental prescribing and treatment claim data to compare the impact of individualised audit and feedback (A&F) interventions on dentists' antibiotic prescribing rates.BACKGROUNDDentists prescribe approximately 10% of antibiotics dispensed in UK community pharmacies. Despite clear clinical guidance, dentists often prescribe antibiotics inappropriately. This cluster-randomised controlled trial used routinely collected National Health Service (NHS) dental prescribing and treatment claim data to compare the impact of individualised audit and feedback (A&F) interventions on dentists' antibiotic prescribing rates.All 795 antibiotic prescribing NHS general dental practices in Scotland were included. Practices were randomised to the control (practices = 163; dentists = 567) or A&F intervention group (practices = 632; dentists = 1,999). A&F intervention practices were allocated to one of two A&F groups: (1) individualised graphical A&F comprising a line graph plotting an individual dentist's monthly antibiotic prescribing rate (practices = 316; dentists = 1,001); or (2) individualised graphical A&F plus a written behaviour change message synthesising and reiterating national guidance recommendations for dental antibiotic prescribing (practices = 316; dentists = 998). Intervention practices were also simultaneously randomised to receive A&F: (i) with or without a health board comparator comprising the addition of a line to the graphical A&F plotting the monthly antibiotic prescribing rate of all dentists in the health board; and (ii) delivered at 0 and 6 mo or at 0, 6, and 9 mo, giving a total of eight intervention groups. The primary outcome, measured by the trial statistician who was blinded to allocation, was the total number of antibiotic items dispensed per 100 NHS treatment claims over the 12 mo post-delivery of the baseline A&F. Primary outcome data was available for 152 control practices (dentists = 438) and 609 intervention practices (dentists = 1,550). At baseline, the number of antibiotic items prescribed per 100 NHS treatment claims was 8.3 in the control group and 8.5 in the intervention group. At follow-up, antibiotic prescribing had decreased by 0.4 antibiotic items per 100 NHS treatment claims in control practices and by 1.0 in intervention practices. This represents a significant reduction (-5.7%; 95% CI -10.2% to -1.1%; p = 0.01) in dentists' prescribing rate in the intervention group relative to the control group. Intervention subgroup analyses found a 6.1% reduction in the antibiotic prescribing rate of dentists who had received the written behaviour change message relative to dentists who had not (95% CI -10.4% to -1.9%; p = 0.01). There was no significant between-group difference in the prescribing rate of dentists who received a health board comparator relative to those who did not (-4.3%; 95% CI -8.6% to 0.1%; p = 0.06), nor between dentists who received A&F at 0 and 6 mo relative to those who received A&F at 0, 6, and 9 mo (0.02%; 95% CI -4.2% to 4.2%; p = 0.99). The key limitations relate to the use of routinely collected datasets which did not allow evaluation of any effects on inappropriate prescribing.METHODS AND FINDINGSAll 795 antibiotic prescribing NHS general dental practices in Scotland were included. Practices were randomised to the control (practices = 163; dentists = 567) or A&F intervention group (practices = 632; dentists = 1,999). A&F intervention practices were allocated to one of two A&F groups: (1) individualised graphical A&F comprising a line graph plotting an individual dentist's monthly antibiotic prescribing rate (practices = 316; dentists = 1,001); or (2) individualised graphical A&F plus a written behaviour change message synthesising and reiterating national guidance recommendations for dental antibiotic prescribing (practices = 316; dentists = 998). Intervention practices were also simultaneously randomised to receive A&F: (i) with or without a health board comparator comprising the addition of a line to the graphical A&F plotting the monthly antibiotic prescribing rate of all dentists in the health board; and (ii) delivered at 0 and 6 mo or at 0, 6, and 9 mo, giving a total of eight intervention groups. The primary outcome, measured by the trial statistician who was blinded to allocation, was the total number of antibiotic items dispensed per 100 NHS treatment claims over the 12 mo post-delivery of the baseline A&F. Primary outcome data was available for 152 control practices (dentists = 438) and 609 intervention practices (dentists = 1,550). At baseline, the number of antibiotic items prescribed per 100 NHS treatment claims was 8.3 in the control group and 8.5 in the intervention group. At follow-up, antibiotic prescribing had decreased by 0.4 antibiotic items per 100 NHS treatment claims in control practices and by 1.0 in intervention practices. This represents a significant reduction (-5.7%; 95% CI -10.2% to -1.1%; p = 0.01) in dentists' prescribing rate in the intervention group relative to the control group. Intervention subgroup analyses found a 6.1% reduction in the antibiotic prescribing rate of dentists who had received the written behaviour change message relative to dentists who had not (95% CI -10.4% to -1.9%; p = 0.01). There was no significant between-group difference in the prescribing rate of dentists who received a health board comparator relative to those who did not (-4.3%; 95% CI -8.6% to 0.1%; p = 0.06), nor between dentists who received A&F at 0 and 6 mo relative to those who received A&F at 0, 6, and 9 mo (0.02%; 95% CI -4.2% to 4.2%; p = 0.99). The key limitations relate to the use of routinely collected datasets which did not allow evaluation of any effects on inappropriate prescribing.A&F derived from routinely collected datasets led to a significant reduction in the antibiotic prescribing rate of dentists.CONCLUSIONSA&F derived from routinely collected datasets led to a significant reduction in the antibiotic prescribing rate of dentists.Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN49204710.TRIAL REGISTRATIONCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN49204710. Dentists prescribe approximately 10% of antibiotics dispensed in UK community pharmacies. Despite clear clinical guidance, dentists often prescribe antibiotics inappropriately. This cluster-randomised controlled trial used routinely collected National Health Service (NHS) dental prescribing and treatment claim data to compare the impact of individualised audit and feedback (A&F) interventions on dentists' antibiotic prescribing rates. All 795 antibiotic prescribing NHS general dental practices in Scotland were included. Practices were randomised to the control (practices = 163; dentists = 567) or A&F intervention group (practices = 632; dentists = 1,999). A&F intervention practices were allocated to one of two A&F groups: (1) individualised graphical A&F comprising a line graph plotting an individual dentist's monthly antibiotic prescribing rate (practices = 316; dentists = 1,001); or (2) individualised graphical A&F plus a written behaviour change message synthesising and reiterating national guidance recommendations for dental antibiotic prescribing (practices = 316; dentists = 998). Intervention practices were also simultaneously randomised to receive A&F: (i) with or without a health board comparator comprising the addition of a line to the graphical A&F plotting the monthly antibiotic prescribing rate of all dentists in the health board; and (ii) delivered at 0 and 6 mo or at 0, 6, and 9 mo, giving a total of eight intervention groups. The primary outcome, measured by the trial statistician who was blinded to allocation, was the total number of antibiotic items dispensed per 100 NHS treatment claims over the 12 mo post-delivery of the baseline A&F. Primary outcome data was available for 152 control practices (dentists = 438) and 609 intervention practices (dentists = 1,550). At baseline, the number of antibiotic items prescribed per 100 NHS treatment claims was 8.3 in the control group and 8.5 in the intervention group. At follow-up, antibiotic prescribing had decreased by 0.4 antibiotic items per 100 NHS treatment claims in control practices and by 1.0 in intervention practices. This represents a significant reduction (-5.7%; 95% CI -10.2% to -1.1%; p = 0.01) in dentists' prescribing rate in the intervention group relative to the control group. Intervention subgroup analyses found a 6.1% reduction in the antibiotic prescribing rate of dentists who had received the written behaviour change message relative to dentists who had not (95% CI -10.4% to -1.9%; p = 0.01). There was no significant between-group difference in the prescribing rate of dentists who received a health board comparator relative to those who did not (-4.3%; 95% CI -8.6% to 0.1%; p = 0.06), nor between dentists who received A&F at 0 and 6 mo relative to those who received A&F at 0, 6, and 9 mo (0.02%; 95% CI -4.2% to 4.2%; p = 0.99). The key limitations relate to the use of routinely collected datasets which did not allow evaluation of any effects on inappropriate prescribing. A&F derived from routinely collected datasets led to a significant reduction in the antibiotic prescribing rate of dentists. Background Dentists prescribe approximately 10% of antibiotics dispensed in UK community pharmacies. Despite clear clinical guidance, dentists often prescribe antibiotics inappropriately. This cluster-randomised controlled trial used routinely collected National Health Service (NHS) dental prescribing and treatment claim data to compare the impact of individualised audit and feedback (A&F) interventions on dentists' antibiotic prescribing rates. Methods and Findings All 795 antibiotic prescribing NHS general dental practices in Scotland were included. Practices were randomised to the control (practices = 163; dentists = 567) or A&F intervention group (practices = 632; dentists = 1,999). A&F intervention practices were allocated to one of two A&F groups: (1) individualised graphical A&F comprising a line graph plotting an individual dentist's monthly antibiotic prescribing rate (practices = 316; dentists = 1,001); or (2) individualised graphical A&F plus a written behaviour change message synthesising and reiterating national guidance recommendations for dental antibiotic prescribing (practices = 316; dentists = 998). Intervention practices were also simultaneously randomised to receive A&F: (i) with or without a health board comparator comprising the addition of a line to the graphical A&F plotting the monthly antibiotic prescribing rate of all dentists in the health board; and (ii) delivered at 0 and 6 mo or at 0, 6, and 9 mo, giving a total of eight intervention groups. The primary outcome, measured by the trial statistician who was blinded to allocation, was the total number of antibiotic items dispensed per 100 NHS treatment claims over the 12 mo post-delivery of the baseline A&F. Primary outcome data was available for 152 control practices (dentists = 438) and 609 intervention practices (dentists = 1,550). At baseline, the number of antibiotic items prescribed per 100 NHS treatment claims was 8.3 in the control group and 8.5 in the intervention group. At follow-up, antibiotic prescribing had decreased by 0.4 antibiotic items per 100 NHS treatment claims in control practices and by 1.0 in intervention practices. This represents a significant reduction (-5.7%; 95% CI -10.2% to -1.1%; p = 0.01) in dentists' prescribing rate in the intervention group relative to the control group. Intervention subgroup analyses found a 6.1% reduction in the antibiotic prescribing rate of dentists who had received the written behaviour change message relative to dentists who had not (95% CI -10.4% to -1.9%; p = 0.01). There was no significant between-group difference in the prescribing rate of dentists who received a health board comparator relative to those who did not (-4.3%; 95% CI -8.6% to 0.1%; p = 0.06), nor between dentists who received A&F at 0 and 6 mo relative to those who received A&F at 0, 6, and 9 mo (0.02%; 95% CI -4.2% to 4.2%; p = 0.99). The key limitations relate to the use of routinely collected datasets which did not allow evaluation of any effects on inappropriate prescribing. Conclusions A&F derived from routinely collected datasets led to a significant reduction in the antibiotic prescribing rate of dentists. Trial Registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN49204710 In this cluster randomized controlled trial, Linda Young and colleagues investigate the impact of an audit and feedback intervention for reducing antibiotic prescribing by dentists. Dentists prescribe approximately 10% of antibiotics dispensed in UK community pharmacies. Despite clear clinical guidance, dentists often prescribe antibiotics inappropriately. This cluster-randomised controlled trial used routinely collected National Health Service (NHS) dental prescribing and treatment claim data to compare the impact of individualised audit and feedback (A&F) interventions on dentists' antibiotic prescribing rates. All 795 antibiotic prescribing NHS general dental practices in Scotland were included. Practices were randomised to the control (practices = 163; dentists = 567) or A&F intervention group (practices = 632; dentists = 1,999). A&F intervention practices were allocated to one of two A&F groups: (1) individualised graphical A&F comprising a line graph plotting an individual dentist's monthly antibiotic prescribing rate (practices = 316; dentists = 1,001); or (2) individualised graphical A&F plus a written behaviour change message synthesising and reiterating national guidance recommendations for dental antibiotic prescribing (practices = 316; dentists = 998). Intervention practices were also simultaneously randomised to receive A&F: (i) with or without a health board comparator comprising the addition of a line to the graphical A&F plotting the monthly antibiotic prescribing rate of all dentists in the health board; and (ii) delivered at 0 and 6 mo or at 0, 6, and 9 mo, giving a total of eight intervention groups. The primary outcome, measured by the trial statistician who was blinded to allocation, was the total number of antibiotic items dispensed per 100 NHS treatment claims over the 12 mo post-delivery of the baseline A&F. Primary outcome data was available for 152 control practices (dentists = 438) and 609 intervention practices (dentists = 1,550). At baseline, the number of antibiotic items prescribed per 100 NHS treatment claims was 8.3 in the control group and 8.5 in the intervention group. At follow-up, antibiotic prescribing had decreased by 0.4 antibiotic items per 100 NHS treatment claims in control practices and by 1.0 in intervention practices. This represents a significant reduction (-5.7%; 95% CI -10.2% to -1.1%; p = 0.01) in dentists' prescribing rate in the intervention group relative to the control group. Intervention subgroup analyses found a 6.1% reduction in the antibiotic prescribing rate of dentists who had received the written behaviour change message relative to dentists who had not (95% CI -10.4% to -1.9%; p = 0.01). There was no significant between-group difference in the prescribing rate of dentists who received a health board comparator relative to those who did not (-4.3%; 95% CI -8.6% to 0.1%; p = 0.06), nor between dentists who received A&F at 0 and 6 mo relative to those who received A&F at 0, 6, and 9 mo (0.02%; 95% CI -4.2% to 4.2%; p = 0.99). The key limitations relate to the use of routinely collected datasets which did not allow evaluation of any effects on inappropriate prescribing. A&F derived from routinely collected datasets led to a significant reduction in the antibiotic prescribing rate of dentists. Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN49204710. BackgroundDentists prescribe approximately 10% of antibiotics dispensed in UK community pharmacies. Despite clear clinical guidance, dentists often prescribe antibiotics inappropriately. This cluster-randomised controlled trial used routinely collected National Health Service (NHS) dental prescribing and treatment claim data to compare the impact of individualised audit and feedback (A&F) interventions on dentists' antibiotic prescribing rates.Methods and findingsAll 795 antibiotic prescribing NHS general dental practices in Scotland were included. Practices were randomised to the control (practices = 163; dentists = 567) or A&F intervention group (practices = 632; dentists = 1,999). A&F intervention practices were allocated to one of two A&F groups: (1) individualised graphical A&F comprising a line graph plotting an individual dentist's monthly antibiotic prescribing rate (practices = 316; dentists = 1,001); or (2) individualised graphical A&F plus a written behaviour change message synthesising and reiterating national guidance recommendations for dental antibiotic prescribing (practices = 316; dentists = 998). Intervention practices were also simultaneously randomised to receive A&F: (i) with or without a health board comparator comprising the addition of a line to the graphical A&F plotting the monthly antibiotic prescribing rate of all dentists in the health board; and (ii) delivered at 0 and 6 mo or at 0, 6, and 9 mo, giving a total of eight intervention groups. The primary outcome, measured by the trial statistician who was blinded to allocation, was the total number of antibiotic items dispensed per 100 NHS treatment claims over the 12 mo post-delivery of the baseline A&F. Primary outcome data was available for 152 control practices (dentists = 438) and 609 intervention practices (dentists = 1,550). At baseline, the number of antibiotic items prescribed per 100 NHS treatment claims was 8.3 in the control group and 8.5 in the intervention group. At follow-up, antibiotic prescribing had decreased by 0.4 antibiotic items per 100 NHS treatment claims in control practices and by 1.0 in intervention practices. This represents a significant reduction (-5.7%; 95% CI -10.2% to -1.1%; p = 0.01) in dentists' prescribing rate in the intervention group relative to the control group. Intervention subgroup analyses found a 6.1% reduction in the antibiotic prescribing rate of dentists who had received the written behaviour change message relative to dentists who had not (95% CI -10.4% to -1.9%; p = 0.01). There was no significant between-group difference in the prescribing rate of dentists who received a health board comparator relative to those who did not (-4.3%; 95% CI -8.6% to 0.1%; p = 0.06), nor between dentists who received A&F at 0 and 6 mo relative to those who received A&F at 0, 6, and 9 mo (0.02%; 95% CI -4.2% to 4.2%; p = 0.99). The key limitations relate to the use of routinely collected datasets which did not allow evaluation of any effects on inappropriate prescribing.ConclusionsA&F derived from routinely collected datasets led to a significant reduction in the antibiotic prescribing rate of dentists.Trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN49204710. |
| Audience | Academic |
| Author | Clarkson, Jan E. Ramsay, Craig R. Newlands, Rumana Elders, Andrew Young, Linda Duncan, Eilidh M. Elouafkaoui, Paula |
| AuthorAffiliation | 3 Health Services Research Unit (HSRU), University of Aberdeen, Health Sciences Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, United Kingdom University of Geneva Hospitals and Medical School, SWITZERLAND 2 Dental Health Services Research Unit (DHSRU), University of Dundee, Park Place, Dundee, United Kingdom 4 NMAHP Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Cowcaddens Road, Glasgow, United Kingdom 1 NHS Education for Scotland (NES), Dundee Dental Education Centre, Frankland Building, Dundee, United Kingdom |
| AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: 4 NMAHP Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Cowcaddens Road, Glasgow, United Kingdom – name: 3 Health Services Research Unit (HSRU), University of Aberdeen, Health Sciences Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, United Kingdom – name: 2 Dental Health Services Research Unit (DHSRU), University of Dundee, Park Place, Dundee, United Kingdom – name: University of Geneva Hospitals and Medical School, SWITZERLAND – name: 1 NHS Education for Scotland (NES), Dundee Dental Education Centre, Frankland Building, Dundee, United Kingdom |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Paula surname: Elouafkaoui fullname: Elouafkaoui, Paula – sequence: 2 givenname: Linda surname: Young fullname: Young, Linda – sequence: 3 givenname: Rumana surname: Newlands fullname: Newlands, Rumana – sequence: 4 givenname: Eilidh M. surname: Duncan fullname: Duncan, Eilidh M. – sequence: 5 givenname: Andrew surname: Elders fullname: Elders, Andrew – sequence: 6 givenname: Jan E. orcidid: 0000-0001-5940-2926 surname: Clarkson fullname: Clarkson, Jan E. – sequence: 7 givenname: Craig R. surname: Ramsay fullname: Ramsay, Craig R. |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27575599$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNqVk99v0zAQxyM0xNjgP0BgCQnBQ4udOD-8B6SqY6PSxKYyeLUc59J6uPawkwn-C_5kLrRD61QhUB5sXz73vfOd7yDZc95BkjxjdMyykr298n1wyo6vV9CMGaUpY_mD5DHLuRixoiz27uz3k4MYr5ARVNBHyX5a5mWeC_E4-TlxZNI3piPKNeQEoKmV_kpmroNwA64z3pHWBzKHptfGLcgEbbXxndHkIkDUAU9oNo6cgoOgLDlGN1wugtJIwRG5XAKZTy7MMZnaPqIwmWMwvzIRGjL1rgveWtxeBqPsk-Rhq2yEp5v1MPl88v5y-mF0dn46m07ORroseDfKs6zOUiFoUapM1RUvRJo3bca5TnnF6zxLVUW1zgAKLZqiriuRZaKhdaoByiY7TF6sda-tj3JTzChZldK0YoyXSMzWROPVlbwOZqXCD-mVkb8NPiykCnhDC5K1BatBaIxZc6B1DbyoFdAGKkxTDNHebaL1NfZLY4mwVFui23-cWcqFv5E5pbzKh2RebwSC_9ZD7CSWT4O1yoHvh7xZLkpephmiL--hu2-3oRYKL2Bc6zGuHkTlhJeCswzfClKjHdRi3Wl8j61B8xY_3sHj18DK6J0Ob7YckOnge7dQfYxy9mn-H-zHf2fPv2yzr-6wS1C2W0Zv--Hxx23w-d0u_mnf7TghcLQGdPAxBmilNp0adLAMxkpG5TC7tw2Rw-zKzeyiM7_nfKv_V7dfJVJHeg |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_identj_2023_03_006 crossref_primary_10_1093_intqhc_mzaa128 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmj_2024_079329 crossref_primary_10_1111_cdoe_12841 crossref_primary_10_1111_bju_15336 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13063_023_07578_5 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41415_021_3621_8 crossref_primary_10_1093_jamia_ocac094 crossref_primary_10_1002_14651858_CD000259_pub4 crossref_primary_10_1111_bjhp_12317 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_adaj_2017_11_034 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13012_019_0954_7 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jiph_2020_05_027 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmj_m213 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0188061 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijmedinf_2023_105092 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0259065 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41415_022_3987_2 crossref_primary_10_1111_bcp_14373 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjqs_2018_008355 crossref_primary_10_1093_jamia_ocac001 crossref_primary_10_3390_healthcare11091211 crossref_primary_10_1111_cdoe_13009 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2023_104654 crossref_primary_10_1111_imj_14979 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13756_023_01279_z crossref_primary_10_1016_j_euo_2018_06_017 crossref_primary_10_4081_idr_2017_6917 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_adaj_2023_04_007 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13012_022_01194_8 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmj_l236 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12913_024_11783_6 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13012_021_01098_z crossref_primary_10_1080_10903127_2017_1328547 crossref_primary_10_1093_abm_kaad059 crossref_primary_10_2147_RMHP_S441165 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_adaj_2017_07_019 crossref_primary_10_1111_jep_13547 crossref_primary_10_1111_cdoe_13037 crossref_primary_10_1093_jacamr_dlae082 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11121_021_01286_9 crossref_primary_10_3390_antibiotics12010136 crossref_primary_10_1093_pm_pnz314 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_adaj_2018_04_027 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11908_020_00722_1 crossref_primary_10_1016_S1473_3099_22_00720_4 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13012_016_0534_z crossref_primary_10_1093_jac_dkaf118 crossref_primary_10_3390_antibiotics9090607 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13012_019_0887_1 crossref_primary_10_1093_cid_ciae604 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2021_059564 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jcms_2017_08_010 crossref_primary_10_1002_rev3_3200 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2018_12_010 crossref_primary_10_1038_sj_bdj_2018_45 crossref_primary_10_1093_ofid_ofz067 crossref_primary_10_1017_cem_2020_28 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_esmoop_2020_04_023 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12889_022_13317_3 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40471_021_00278_1 crossref_primary_10_47102_annals_acadmedsg_202523 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2020_046142 crossref_primary_10_1093_crocol_otac018 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13012_021_01177_1 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jamda_2019_11_017 crossref_primary_10_1093_jac_dkac317 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12911_018_0642_6 crossref_primary_10_1111_adj_12846 crossref_primary_10_1093_abm_kaae087 crossref_primary_10_3390_antibiotics10080987 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13063_019_3299_2 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13012_017_0646_0 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40267_017_0388_8 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1308/204268510X12610466792684 10.1016/S0924-8579(09)70550-3 10.1007/s12160-013-9486-6 10.1186/1748-5908-4-50 10.1186/1748-5908-9-14 10.1186/1748-5908-9-50 10.1136/qshc.2004.011155 10.1308/205016814813877333 10.1136/bmj.f4403 10.1038/sj.bdj.4801156 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.09.004 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.02.006 10.1038/sj.bdj.4801190 10.2147/TCRM.S9736 10.1186/1745-6215-15-215 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)70799-6 10.1186/s13012-016-0372-z 10.1186/1748-5908-9-27 10.1186/1748-5908-7-37 10.1308/205016814813877324 10.1136/bmj.38182.591238.EB 10.1136/bmj.325.7360.367 10.1186/1748-5908-6-10 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318178eabd 10.1136/bmj.d8173 10.1345/aph.1L488 10.1186/s13012-014-0152-6 10.1186/1748-5908-5-57 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | COPYRIGHT 2016 Public Library of Science 2016 Public Library of Science. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited: Elouafkaoui P, Young L, Newlands R, Duncan EM, Elders A, Clarkson JE, et al. (2016) An Audit and Feedback Intervention for Reducing Antibiotic Prescribing in General Dental Practice: The RAPiD Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial. PLoS Med 13(8): e1002115. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002115 2016 Elouafkaoui et al 2016 Elouafkaoui et al 2016 Public Library of Science. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited: Elouafkaoui P, Young L, Newlands R, Duncan EM, Elders A, Clarkson JE, et al. (2016) An Audit and Feedback Intervention for Reducing Antibiotic Prescribing in General Dental Practice: The RAPiD Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial. PLoS Med 13(8): e1002115. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002115 |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: COPYRIGHT 2016 Public Library of Science – notice: 2016 Public Library of Science. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited: Elouafkaoui P, Young L, Newlands R, Duncan EM, Elders A, Clarkson JE, et al. (2016) An Audit and Feedback Intervention for Reducing Antibiotic Prescribing in General Dental Practice: The RAPiD Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial. PLoS Med 13(8): e1002115. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002115 – notice: 2016 Elouafkaoui et al 2016 Elouafkaoui et al – notice: 2016 Public Library of Science. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited: Elouafkaoui P, Young L, Newlands R, Duncan EM, Elders A, Clarkson JE, et al. (2016) An Audit and Feedback Intervention for Reducing Antibiotic Prescribing in General Dental Practice: The RAPiD Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial. PLoS Med 13(8): e1002115. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002115 |
| CorporateAuthor | Translation Research in a Dental Setting (TRiaDS) Research Methodology Group |
| CorporateAuthor_xml | – name: Translation Research in a Dental Setting (TRiaDS) Research Methodology Group |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM IOV ISN ISR 3V. 7TK 7X7 7XB 88E 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA AZQEC BENPR CCPQU DWQXO FYUFA GHDGH K9. M0S M1P PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI 7X8 5PM DOA CZK |
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002115 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Opposing Viewpoints (Gale in Context) Gale In Context: Canada Gale In Context: Science ProQuest Central (Corporate) Neurosciences Abstracts Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Hospital Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central ProQuest One ProQuest Central Proquest Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Collection Medical Database ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic (retired) ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals PLoS Medicine |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest Central ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection Health Research Premium Collection Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) Neurosciences Abstracts ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic Publicly Available Content Database MEDLINE |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: PIMPY name: ProQuest Publicly Available Content Database url: http://search.proquest.com/publiccontent sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Medicine Dentistry Education Public Health |
| DocumentTitleAlternate | Reducing Antibiotic Prescribing in Dentistry (RAPiD) |
| EISSN | 1549-1676 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 1820281147 oai_doaj_org_article_1f61be9c2a8b4e0bbe46bae0de83b39d PMC5004857 4184960081 A479413909 27575599 10_1371_journal_pmed_1002115 |
| Genre | Randomized Controlled Trial Journal Article |
| GeographicLocations | United Kingdom United Kingdom--UK Scotland |
| GeographicLocations_xml | – name: United Kingdom – name: United Kingdom--UK – name: Scotland |
| GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: Chief Scientist Office grantid: HSRU2 – fundername: Chief Scientist Office grantid: NMAHP2 |
| GroupedDBID | --- 123 29O 2WC 53G 5VS 7X7 88E 8FI 8FJ AAFWJ AAUCC AAWOE AAWTL AAYXX ABDBF ABUWG ACCTH ACGFO ACIHN ACPRK ACUHS ADBBV ADRAZ AEAQA AENEX AFFHD AFKRA AFPKN AFRAH AFXKF AHMBA AKRSQ ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AOIJS B0M BAIFH BAWUL BBTPI BCNDV BENPR BPHCQ BVXVI BWKFM CCPQU CITATION CS3 DIK DU5 E3Z EAP EAS EBD EBS EJD EMK EMOBN ESX F5P FPL FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HMCUK HYE IAO IHR IHW INH INR IOF IOV IPO ISN ISR ITC KQ8 M1P M48 MK0 O5R O5S OK1 OVT P2P PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PPXIY PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO PV9 RNS RPM RZL SV3 TR2 TUS UKHRP WOW XSB YZZ ~8M ADXHL ALIPV CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF H13 IPNFZ NPM RIG WOQ 3V. 7TK 7XB 8FK AZQEC DWQXO K9. PKEHL PQEST PQUKI 7X8 PUEGO 5PM AAPBV ABPTK BCGST CZK ICW M~E |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c764t-533b3299067a3ab846925df344c2484b532a80cc3ee6c9d6bb89339d0b2cee7d3 |
| IEDL.DBID | 7X7 |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 84 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000383357400029&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 1549-1676 1549-1277 |
| IngestDate | Sun Aug 06 00:45:55 EDT 2023 Fri Oct 03 12:40:14 EDT 2025 Tue Nov 04 02:01:24 EST 2025 Thu Sep 04 16:47:50 EDT 2025 Sat Nov 29 14:52:10 EST 2025 Tue Nov 11 10:14:21 EST 2025 Sat Nov 29 11:25:24 EST 2025 Tue Nov 04 17:46:48 EST 2025 Thu Nov 13 14:56:52 EST 2025 Thu Nov 13 15:46:29 EST 2025 Thu Nov 13 15:52:10 EST 2025 Thu May 22 21:23:38 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 06:01:33 EDT 2025 Sat Nov 29 05:44:39 EST 2025 Tue Nov 18 20:24:50 EST 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 8 |
| Language | English |
| License | This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. Creative Commons Attribution License |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c764t-533b3299067a3ab846925df344c2484b532a80cc3ee6c9d6bb89339d0b2cee7d3 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 Conceived and designed the experiments: PE LY RN EMD AE JEC CRR. Analyzed the data: CRR PE AE. Wrote the first draft of the manuscript: PE. Contributed to the writing of the manuscript: PE LY RN EMD AE JEC CRR. Agree with the manuscript’s results and conclusions: PE LY RN EMD AE JEC CRR. Contributed to the conceptual and theoretical development of the study: PE LY RN EMD AE JEC CRR Responsible for the data management: PE Conducted the data linkage and created the A&F interventions: PE AE Responsible for the development of the written behaviour change intervention and contributed to the analysis of the process evaluation: ED Designed and conducted the statistical analyses: CRF AE PE Conducted and analysed the process evaluation: RN Drafted the manuscript: PE Contributed to the interpretation of the analyses, critically reviewed and revised manuscript drafts and read and approved the final version of the paper: PE LY RN EMD AE JEC CRR Guarantor: CRAll authors have read, and confirm that they meet, ICMJE criteria for authorship. I have read the journal's policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: Authors LY and JEC are employed by NHS Education for Scotland, which is responsible for supporting NHS services in Scotland by developing and delivering education and training for those who work in NHS Scotland. Author AE declared that during the course of the study, he was in paid full-time employment firstly by the University of Aberdeen and subsequently by Glasgow Caledonian University. The research was carried out on behalf of the TRiaDS Research Methodology Group (of which AE is a member). This group is funded by NHS Education for Scotland. No other competing interests exist. Membership of the Translation Research in a Dental Setting (TRiaDS) Research Methodology Group is provided in the Acknowledgments. |
| ORCID | 0000-0001-5940-2926 |
| OpenAccessLink | https://www.proquest.com/docview/1820281147?pq-origsite=%requestingapplication% |
| PMID | 27575599 |
| PQID | 1820281147 |
| PQPubID | 1436338 |
| ParticipantIDs | plos_journals_1820281147 doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_1f61be9c2a8b4e0bbe46bae0de83b39d pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5004857 proquest_miscellaneous_1815974723 proquest_journals_1820281147 gale_infotracmisc_A479413909 gale_infotracgeneralonefile_A479413909 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A479413909 gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A479413909 gale_incontextgauss_ISN_A479413909 gale_incontextgauss_IOV_A479413909 gale_healthsolutions_A479413909 pubmed_primary_27575599 crossref_citationtrail_10_1371_journal_pmed_1002115 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pmed_1002115 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 20160830 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2016-08-30 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 8 year: 2016 text: 20160830 day: 30 |
| PublicationDecade | 2010 |
| PublicationPlace | United States |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States – name: San Francisco – name: San Francisco, CA USA |
| PublicationTitle | PLoS medicine |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | PLoS Med |
| PublicationYear | 2016 |
| Publisher | Public Library of Science Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Public Library of Science – name: Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| References | N Ivers (ref13) 2012; 6 ref1 ref19 H Goossens (ref2) 2005; 365 (ref16) 2013 S Gjelstad (ref32) 2013; 347 MH Wilcox (ref3) 2009; 34 AL Cope (ref5) 2014; 3 CC Butler (ref38) 2007; 57 S Flottorp (ref31) 2002; 325 T Johnson (ref7) 2014; 3 LJ Damschroder (ref22) 2009; 4 J McCambridge (ref26) 2014; 67 R Newlands (ref25) 2016; 11 YM Dailey (ref12) 2001; 191 I Welschen (ref30) 2004; 329 (ref9) 2011 A O’Cathain (ref28) 2014; 15 NA Palmer (ref34) 2001; 191 SR Ranji (ref35) 2008; 46 SR Arnold (ref37) 2005 C Löffler (ref33) 2014; 9 JE Squires (ref39) 2014; 9 S Michie (ref18) 2013; 46 S Michie (ref23) 2005; 14 CC Butler (ref29) 2012; 344 WH Rogers (ref21) 1993; 13 (ref10) 2012 MV Martin (ref4) 2010; 1 M Prior (ref15) 2014; 9 GF Borm (ref20) 2007; 60 NM Ivers (ref27) 2014; 9 ref8 S Michie (ref17) 2011; 6 ref6 R Ostini (ref36) 2009; 43 JE Clarkson (ref14) 2010; 5 J Cane (ref24) 2012; 7 NS Dar-Odeh (ref11) 2010; 6 |
| References_xml | – volume: 1 start-page: 15 year: 2010 ident: ref4 article-title: Antimicrobials and dentistry: a rationale for their use publication-title: Fac Dent J doi: 10.1308/204268510X12610466792684 – volume: 34 start-page: S6 issue: Suppl 3 year: 2009 ident: ref3 article-title: The tide of antimicrobial resistance and selection publication-title: Int. J Antimicrob Agents doi: 10.1016/S0924-8579(09)70550-3 – ident: ref1 – volume: 46 start-page: 81 year: 2013 ident: ref18 article-title: The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions publication-title: Ann Behav Med doi: 10.1007/s12160-013-9486-6 – volume: 4 start-page: 50 year: 2009 ident: ref22 article-title: Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing publication-title: Implement Sci doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-50 – volume: 9 start-page: 14 year: 2014 ident: ref27 article-title: No more ‘business as usual’ with audit and feedback interventions: towards an agenda for a reinvigorated intervention publication-title: Implement Sci doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-14 – volume: 9 start-page: 50 year: 2014 ident: ref15 article-title: Evaluating an audit and feedback intervention for reducing antibiotic prescribing behaviour in general dental practice (the RAPiD trial): a partial factorial cluster randomised trial protocol publication-title: Implement Sci doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-50 – volume: 14 start-page: 26 year: 2005 ident: ref23 article-title: Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach publication-title: Qual Saf Health Care doi: 10.1136/qshc.2004.011155 – start-page: CD003539 year: 2005 ident: ref37 article-title: Interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing practices in ambulatory care publication-title: Cochrane Database Syst Rev – volume: 3 start-page: 33 year: 2014 ident: ref5 article-title: Inappropriate prescribing of antibiotics in primary dental care: reasons and resolutions publication-title: Prim Dent J doi: 10.1308/205016814813877333 – volume: 347 start-page: f4403 year: 2013 ident: ref32 article-title: Improving antibiotic prescribing in acute respiratory tract infections: cluster randomised trial from Norwegian general practice (prescription peer academic detailing (Rx-PAD) study) publication-title: BMJ doi: 10.1136/bmj.f4403 – volume: 191 start-page: 253 year: 2001 ident: ref34 article-title: Can audit improve antibiotic prescribing in general dental practice? publication-title: Br Dent J doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4801156 – volume: 67 start-page: 247 year: 2014 ident: ref26 article-title: In randomization we trust? There are overlooked problems in experimenting with people in behavioral intervention trials publication-title: J Clin Epidemiol doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.09.004 – volume: 60 start-page: 1234 year: 2007 ident: ref20 article-title: A simple sample size formula for analysis of covariance in randomized clinical trials publication-title: J Clin Epidemiol doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.02.006 – ident: ref19 – volume: 191 start-page: 391 year: 2001 ident: ref12 article-title: Therapeutics: Are antibiotics being used appropriately for emergency dental treatment? publication-title: Br Dent J doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4801190 – volume: 6 start-page: 301 year: 2010 ident: ref11 article-title: Antibiotic prescribing practices by dentists: a review publication-title: Ther Clin Risk Manag doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S9736 – volume: 15 start-page: 215 year: 2014 ident: ref28 article-title: Getting added value from using qualitative research with randomized controlled trials: a qualitative interview study publication-title: Trials doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-215 – volume: 6 start-page: CD000259 year: 2012 ident: ref13 article-title: Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes publication-title: Cochrane Database Syst Rev – year: 2011 ident: ref9 article-title: Drug prescribing for dentistry – year: 2013 ident: ref16 article-title: British National Formulary (BNF) 65 – volume: 13 start-page: 19 year: 1993 ident: ref21 article-title: Regression standard errors in clustered samples publication-title: Stata Technical Bulletin – volume: 365 start-page: 579 issue: 9459 year: 2005 ident: ref2 article-title: Outpatient antibiotic use in Europe and association with resistance: a cross-national database study publication-title: Lancet doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)70799-6 – volume: 11 start-page: 11 year: 2016 ident: ref25 article-title: Barriers and facilitators of evidence-based management of patients with bacterial infections among general dental practitioners: a theory-informed interview study publication-title: Implement Sci doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0372-z – volume: 9 start-page: 27 year: 2014 ident: ref33 article-title: Dental care resistance prevention and antibiotic prescribing modification—the cluster-randomised controlled DREAM trial publication-title: Implement Sci doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-27 – ident: ref6 – year: 2012 ident: ref10 article-title: Antimicrobial Prescribing For General Dental Practitioners – volume: 7 start-page: 37 year: 2012 ident: ref24 article-title: Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research publication-title: Implement Sci doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-37 – volume: 3 start-page: 44 year: 2014 ident: ref7 article-title: Awareness of antibiotic prescribing and resistance in primary dental care publication-title: Prim Dent J doi: 10.1308/205016814813877324 – volume: 329 start-page: 431 year: 2004 ident: ref30 article-title: Effectiveness of a multiple intervention to reduce antibiotic prescribing for respiratory tract symptoms in primary care: randomised controlled trial publication-title: BMJ doi: 10.1136/bmj.38182.591238.EB – volume: 325 start-page: 367 year: 2002 ident: ref31 article-title: Cluster randomised controlled trial of tailored interventions to improve the management of urinary tract infections in women and sore throat publication-title: BMJ doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7360.367 – volume: 6 start-page: 10 year: 2011 ident: ref17 article-title: Strengthening evaluation and implementation by specifying components of behaviour change interventions: a study protocol publication-title: Implement Sci doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-10 – ident: ref8 – volume: 46 start-page: 847 year: 2008 ident: ref35 article-title: Interventions to reduce unnecessary antibiotic prescribing: a systematic review and quantitative analysis publication-title: Med Care doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318178eabd – volume: 344 start-page: d8173 year: 2012 ident: ref29 article-title: Effectiveness of multifaceted educational programme to reduce antibiotic dispensing in primary care: practice based randomised controlled trial publication-title: BMJ doi: 10.1136/bmj.d8173 – volume: 57 start-page: 785 year: 2007 ident: ref38 article-title: Containing antibiotic resistance: decreased antibiotic-resistant coliform urinary tract infections with reduction in antibiotic prescribing by general practices publication-title: Br J Gen Pract – volume: 43 start-page: 502 year: 2009 ident: ref36 article-title: Systematic review of interventions to improve prescribing publication-title: Ann Pharmacother doi: 10.1345/aph.1L488 – volume: 9 start-page: 152 year: 2014 ident: ref39 article-title: Are multifaceted interventions more effective than single-component interventions in changing health-care professionals’ behaviours? An overview of systematic reviews publication-title: Implement Sci doi: 10.1186/s13012-014-0152-6 – volume: 5 start-page: 57 year: 2010 ident: ref14 article-title: The translation research in a dental setting (TRiaDS) programme protocol publication-title: Implement Sci doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-57 |
| SSID | ssj0029090 |
| Score | 2.5010262 |
| Snippet | Dentists prescribe approximately 10% of antibiotics dispensed in UK community pharmacies. Despite clear clinical guidance, dentists often prescribe antibiotics... Background Dentists prescribe approximately 10% of antibiotics dispensed in UK community pharmacies. Despite clear clinical guidance, dentists often prescribe... In this cluster randomized controlled trial, Linda Young and colleagues investigate the impact of an audit and feedback intervention for reducing antibiotic... BackgroundDentists prescribe approximately 10% of antibiotics dispensed in UK community pharmacies. Despite clear clinical guidance, dentists often prescribe... Background Dentists prescribe approximately 10% of antibiotics dispensed in UK community pharmacies. Despite clear clinical guidance, dentists often... |
| SourceID | plos doaj pubmedcentral proquest gale pubmed crossref |
| SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
| StartPage | e1002115 |
| SubjectTerms | Analysis Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use Antibiotics Antimicrobial agents Audits Biology and Life Sciences Computer and Information Sciences Dentistry Dentists Design Dosage and administration Drug resistance Education Engineering and Technology Feedback Health care costs Humans Inappropriate Prescribing - prevention & control Inappropriate Prescribing - statistics & numerical data Management Medical Audit Medicine and Health Sciences Patient safety People and places Pharmacy Practice Practice Patterns, Dentists' - statistics & numerical data Public health Research methodology Researchers Scotland Studies |
| SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lj9MwELZQhRAXxPLasgsYhOAUNomdOOEWulSsBKUqC9pb5FeWiiqpti2_g5_MjONGDaq0e-BWxV8S1TOeRzzzmZDXkYkkT6okyMNKBNxGaSCTKAvAHuvMgIPmlWsU_iwmk-ziIp_uHPWFNWEtPXA7cSdRlUbK5jqWmeI2VMryVEkbGpsxxXKD1jcU-TaZ8qlWHrqvK8g_FkSxEL5pjonoxMvo3RK8jSMgjfBI3B2n5Lj7Ows9WC6a1b7w898qyh23NL5P7vl4khbt_zggt2z9gNz54nfMH5I_RU0L7LygsjZ0DL5KSf2Lnu2UOlKIW-kMKVzBjdGixi6SBh5HsTwDjIrCy_OaeoZqeuo6KOnU91e9p6BqdFZM56d0tNgg8QKdwcsa0CBr6KithV_Az3NU9kfk-_jj-ehT4E9hCLRI-TqAeFAxdFqpkEwqiFfyODEV41zHPOMqYSCaUGtmbapzkyoFIRAIJlQxCFwY9pgM6qa2h4QaZiBCVJpr0AITg81PNGRcViEHvGBySNhWDKX2FOV4UsaidPtuAlKVdlZLFF7phTckQXfXsqXouAb_ASXcYZFg210AtSu92pXXqd2QvED9KNtu1c5MlAUy9kNUHeZD8sohkGSjxiqeS7lZrcqzrz9uAPo2uQlo1gO99aCqgTnT0rdXwMwjw1cP-aaHvGy1Zx_wuAcEtdG94UNcG9s5XpV4FkCcQYIt4M7tetk__LIbxodinV9tmw1iIpfhxmxInrTLq5NTLCC1SHJ4r-gtvJ4g-yP1_KdjTE_QUSXi6f-Q_BG5C0Fz6vYVwmMyWF9t7DNyW_9ez1dXz50Z-gv7mY63 priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – databaseName: Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access dbid: FPL link: http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3rb9MwELdQQQgJ8SiPFQYYhOBTRhInccy30FExaZSqDLRvkV_ZqlVJtbb8HfzJ3CVuWKZOjG9VfK7Te_ju6rufCXkbmEBGcRF7wi-4F9kg8WQcpB7sxzo14KCjom4UPuTjcXp8LCZ_E8VLJ_iMBx8cT_cW4B1qwNAAe8pvhixJMNkaTQ7bBEv4wnftcVfN7LifGqW_3Yt7i3m13BZoXq6XvOCARvf_99UfkHsu1KRZoxsPyQ1b9vGWZlfR0Se3v7qD9T652_x9R5uupEfkd1bSDBs2qCwNHYGLU1Kf0YMLFZIUwl06ReRX8H40K7H5pIKlKFZ1wF6k8PGspA7Ymu7XjZd04tqyPlLQUDrNJrN9OpyvEa-BTmGxChTPGjpsSujn8PEIbeQx-TH6fDT84rnLGzzNk2jlQRipGPq6hEsmFYQ5IoxNwaJIh1EaqZiFMvW1ZtYmWphEKYicmDC-CkFPuGFPSK-sSrtDqGEGAkulIw3KY0JwFbGGRM0qhI7nTA4I28g01w7ZHC_YmOf1cR2HDKfheI6CyJ0gBsRrZy0aZI9_0H9CdWlpEZe7fgASz52Z50GRBMoKDb9NRdZXykaJktY3NgV2CDMgr1DZ8qbJtd1d8gyB_iEY98WAvKkpEJujxOKfE7leLvODbz-vQfR9fB2iaYfovSMqKuCZlq4rAziPwGAdyncdypNGe7YR7nYIQW10Z3gHDW3D42WOVwiEKeTlHGZujG_78Ot2GL8UywNLW62RJqgT45ANyNPGVls5hRwykljAurxjxR1BdkfK2WkNtB6jf4v5s6vf-Dm5AxF0Uh8y-Luktzpf2xfklv61mi3PX9a70x9hqo_E priority: 102 providerName: Public Library of Science |
| Title | An Audit and Feedback Intervention for Reducing Antibiotic Prescribing in General Dental Practice: The RAPiD Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial |
| URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27575599 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1820281147 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1815974723 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC5004857 https://doaj.org/article/1f61be9c2a8b4e0bbe46bae0de83b39d http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002115 |
| Volume | 13 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos000383357400029&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVAON databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals customDbUrl: eissn: 1549-1676 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0029090 issn: 1549-1676 databaseCode: DOA dateStart: 20040101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.doaj.org/ providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Health & Medical Collection (ProQuest) customDbUrl: eissn: 1549-1676 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0029090 issn: 1549-1676 databaseCode: 7X7 dateStart: 20041001 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/healthcomplete providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: ProQuest Central customDbUrl: eissn: 1549-1676 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0029090 issn: 1549-1676 databaseCode: BENPR dateStart: 20041001 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.proquest.com/central providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: ProQuest Publicly Available Content Database customDbUrl: eissn: 1549-1676 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0029090 issn: 1549-1676 databaseCode: PIMPY dateStart: 20041001 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://search.proquest.com/publiccontent providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVATS databaseName: Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access customDbUrl: eissn: 1549-1676 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0029090 issn: 1549-1676 databaseCode: FPL dateStart: 20040101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://www.plos.org/publications/ providerName: Public Library of Science |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1bb9MwFLagQwgJcSmXFcYwCMFTWO5OeEFdt4pKW4nKQOUpii8pFVVSmpbfwU_mHMftGlTBJF6iKj6pE_vcbJ_zHUJeOdLJ_CAPrNjOmeUrJ7SywIks0McikmCg_VwnCp-x4TAaj-PEbLhVJqxyrRO1opalwD3yIwQadyPw3tn7-Q8Lq0bh6aopoXGd7GHZbORzNr5ccMW23mNBFDLLcRkzqXMec47MTL2dg83RMKQOFsbdMk0awX-jp1vzWVntckL_jKXcMk79u__7WffIHeOW0m7NR_fJNVW0saKzif5ok5vn5hC-TW7XW320zmB6QH51C9rF5A6aFZL2wRzyTHyng61oSgquMR0hSixYStotMFGlhK4oRoCA3uJ4e1pQA4JNT3SSJk1MCtc7CtxMR91kekJ7sxViO9ARdFYCkypJe3W4_Qx-XqA8PSSf-6cXvQ-WKfRgCRb6SwtcTu6hXQxZ5mUcXKLYDWTu-b5w_cjngedmkS2Ep1QoYhlyDl6WF0ubu8BTTHqPSKsoC7VPqPQkOKFc-AIYTbpgVgIBizrFEWaeeVmHeOs5ToVBQcdiHLNUH-0xWA3VI54iZ6SGMzrE2jw1r1FA_kF_jOyzoUUMb32jXExSoxJSJw8drmIB38Z9ZXOu_JBnypYqguGIZYc8R-ZL64TYjSZKu1gUABx3O-6Ql5oCcTwKDBSaZKuqSgcfv1yB6NPwKkSjBtEbQ5SXMGYiMxkcMPIIItagfN2gnNTcs4vwoEEIbCMazfsoeOsxrtJLcYEn1wK1u_nFphn_FEMJC1WukMbRi2jX65DHtexu5sllsHoJYuiXNaS6MZHNlmL6TYOyB2gLA_bk76_1lNwCjzvUhxL2AWktFyv1jNwQP5fTanGotZe-Rodk7_h0mIwO9SYRXPvJGdxLBufJ19_kNqmR |
| linkProvider | ProQuest |
| linkToHtml | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMw1V1Zb9NAEF6VggAJcYSjgUIXROHJ1PfaSAiZhqhR0xCFgPpmvIdLRGSHpgHxL_gl_EZm1uu0RhX0pQ-8Rd6xHY9nvplZz0HIU0c6mR_kgRXbObN85YRWFjiRBXgsIgkG2s91oXCfDQbR_n48XCG_6loYTKusMVEDtSwF7pFvYaNxNwLvnb2efbVwahR-Xa1HaFRisat-fIeQbf6q14H3u-m63bfj7R3LTBWwBAv9Iwv8G-4hCIcs8zIO9jd2A5l7vi9cP_J54LlZZAvhKRWKWIac40T6WNrchQdg0oPrXiAXAccZBnts_zjAi229p4NdzyzHZcyU6nnM2TKS8WIGNk63PXVwEO8JU6gnBiztwupsWs5Pc3r_zN08YQy7N_43Nt4k143bTZNKT26RFVW0cGK1yW5pkct7JsmgRa5VW5m0qtC6TX4mBU2weIVmhaRdMPc8E19o70S2KAXXn46wCy54AjQpsBCnhFtRzHABXOZ4eFJQ0-SbdnQRKh2aErWXFLSVjpLhpEO3pwvsXUFHcLMSlFBJul2VE0zh5xjx4g75cC68uktWi7JQa4RKT4KTzYUvQJGkC2YzEBC0Ko5t9JmXtYlXy1QqTJd3HDYyTfWnSwbRXsXxFCUxNZLYJtbyrFnV5eQf9G9QXJe02KNcHygPD1IDeamThw5XsYBn476yOVd-yDNlSxUBO2LZJhso7GlV8LtE2jTBoQcQmNhxmzzRFNinpMBEqINsMZ-nvXcfz0D0fnAWolGD6LkhykvgmchMhQpwHpukNSifNSgPKuk5jXC9QQhiIxrLa6joNY_n6bF6wpm1Ap--_Hi5jBfFVMlClQukcfQmgeu1yb0KK5bvyWUQnQUx3Jc1UKTxIpsrxeSzbjofoK0P2P2__60NcmVnvNdP-73B7gNyFaKLUH-AsdfJ6tHhQj0kl8S3o8n88JFGTko-nTfG_AbtJv-b |
| linkToPdf | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMw1V1Zb9NAEF6VFFVIiCMcDRS6II4nE99rIyEUEiKitiFKCypPxns4RER2yAHiX_B7-HXM2BsTowj60gfeIu_Yjscz38ys5yDkkSWt2PUSzwjNhBmusnwj9qzAADwWgQQD7SZ5ofAh6_eD09NwsEV-rmphMK1yhYk5UMtM4B55ExuN2wF476yZ6LSIQaf7cvrFwAlS-KV1NU6jEJED9f0bhG_zF70OvOvHtt19fdJ-Y-gJA4ZgvrswwNfhDgKyz2In5mCLQ9uTieO6wnYDl3uOHQemEI5SvgilzzlOpw-lyW14GCYduO4Fsg0uuWvXyPagdzT4UIZ7oZnv8GAPNMOyGdOFew6zmlpOnk3B4uVNUC0cy7tmGPP5AaWVqE0n2XyTC_xnJueaaexe_Z-Zeo1c0Q45bRUadJ1sqbSOs6x13kud7Bzp9IM6uVxsctKidusG-dFKaQvLWmicStoFR4DH4jPtreWRUggK6BD744KPQFspluhkcCuKuS-A2BwPj1Oq23_TTl6eSge6eO05BT2mw9Zg3KHtyRK7WtAh3CwD9VSStotCgwn8PEEkuUnenQuvbpFamqVql1DpSHC_uXAFqJi0waB6AsJZxbHBPnPiBnFW8hUJ3f8dx5BMovyjJoM4sOB4hFIZaalsEKM8a1r0P_kH_SsU3ZIWu5fnB7LZKNJgGFmJb3EVCng27iqTc-X6PFamVAGwI5QNso-CHxWlwCUGRy0chwAhixk2yMOcAjuYpCi2o3g5n0e9t-_PQHTcPwvRsEL0VBMlGfBMxLp2BTiP7dMqlE8qlKNCejYR7lUIQWxEZXkXlX7F43n0W1XhzJUyb15-UC7jRTGJMlXZEmmsfPvAdhrkdoEb5XuyGcRtXgj3ZRVEqbzI6ko6_pS3o_fQC_DYnb__rX2yA9ASHfb6B3fJJQg7_PzLjLlHaovZUt0jF8XXxXg-u69hlJKP5w0yvwC5xgn5 |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An+Audit+and+Feedback+Intervention+for+Reducing+Antibiotic+Prescribing+in+General+Dental+Practice%3A+The+RAPiD+Cluster+Randomised+Controlled+Trial&rft.jtitle=PLoS+medicine&rft.au=Newlands%2C+Rumana&rft.au=Duncan%2C+Eilidh+M&rft.au=Clarkson%2C+Jan+E&rft.au=Elouafkaoui%2C+Paula&rft.date=2016-08-30&rft.pub=Public+Library+of+Science&rft.issn=1549-1277&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.1002115&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=A479413909 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1549-1676&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1549-1676&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1549-1676&client=summon |