Effect of Health Risk Assessment and Counselling on Health Behaviour and Survival in Older People: A Pragmatic Randomised Trial
Potentially avoidable risk factors continue to cause unnecessary disability and premature death in older people. Health risk assessment (HRA), a method successfully used in working-age populations, is a promising method for cost-effective health promotion and preventive care in older individuals, bu...
Saved in:
| Published in: | PLoS medicine Vol. 12; no. 10; p. e1001889 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
United States
Public Library of Science
01.10.2015
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| Subjects: | |
| ISSN: | 1549-1676, 1549-1277, 1549-1676 |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Abstract | Potentially avoidable risk factors continue to cause unnecessary disability and premature death in older people. Health risk assessment (HRA), a method successfully used in working-age populations, is a promising method for cost-effective health promotion and preventive care in older individuals, but the long-term effects of this approach are unknown. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of an innovative approach to HRA and counselling in older individuals for health behaviours, preventive care, and long-term survival.
This study was a pragmatic, single-centre randomised controlled clinical trial in community-dwelling individuals aged 65 y or older registered with one of 19 primary care physician (PCP) practices in a mixed rural and urban area in Switzerland. From November 2000 to January 2002, 874 participants were randomly allocated to the intervention and 1,410 to usual care. The intervention consisted of HRA based on self-administered questionnaires and individualised computer-generated feedback reports, combined with nurse and PCP counselling over a 2-y period. Primary outcomes were health behaviours and preventive care use at 2 y and all-cause mortality at 8 y. At baseline, participants in the intervention group had a mean ± standard deviation of 6.9 ± 3.7 risk factors (including unfavourable health behaviours, health and functional impairments, and social risk factors) and 4.3 ± 1.8 deficits in recommended preventive care. At 2 y, favourable health behaviours and use of preventive care were more frequent in the intervention than in the control group (based on z-statistics from generalised estimating equation models). For example, 70% compared to 62% were physically active (odds ratio 1.43, 95% CI 1.16-1.77, p = 0.001), and 66% compared to 59% had influenza vaccinations in the past year (odds ratio 1.35, 95% CI 1.09-1.66, p = 0.005). At 8 y, based on an intention-to-treat analysis, the estimated proportion alive was 77.9% in the intervention and 72.8% in the control group, for an absolute mortality difference of 4.9% (95% CI 1.3%-8.5%, p = 0.009; based on z-test for risk difference). The hazard ratio of death comparing intervention with control was 0.79 (95% CI 0.66-0.94, p = 0.009; based on Wald test from Cox regression model), and the number needed to receive the intervention to prevent one death was 21 (95% CI 12-79). The main limitations of the study include the single-site study design, the use of a brief self-administered questionnaire for 2-y outcome data collection, the unavailability of other long-term outcome data (e.g., functional status, nursing home admissions), and the availability of long-term follow-up data on mortality for analysis only in 2014.
This is the first trial to our knowledge demonstrating that a collaborative care model of HRA in community-dwelling older people not only results in better health behaviours and increased use of recommended preventive care interventions, but also improves survival. The intervention tested in our study may serve as a model of how to implement a relatively low-cost but effective programme of disease prevention and health promotion in older individuals.
International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number: ISRCTN 28458424. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Potentially avoidable risk factors continue to cause unnecessary disability and premature death in older people. Health risk assessment (HRA), a method successfully used in working-age populations, is a promising method for cost-effective health promotion and preventive care in older individuals, but the long-term effects of this approach are unknown. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of an innovative approach to HRA and counselling in older individuals for health behaviours, preventive care, and long-term survival.BACKGROUNDPotentially avoidable risk factors continue to cause unnecessary disability and premature death in older people. Health risk assessment (HRA), a method successfully used in working-age populations, is a promising method for cost-effective health promotion and preventive care in older individuals, but the long-term effects of this approach are unknown. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of an innovative approach to HRA and counselling in older individuals for health behaviours, preventive care, and long-term survival.This study was a pragmatic, single-centre randomised controlled clinical trial in community-dwelling individuals aged 65 y or older registered with one of 19 primary care physician (PCP) practices in a mixed rural and urban area in Switzerland. From November 2000 to January 2002, 874 participants were randomly allocated to the intervention and 1,410 to usual care. The intervention consisted of HRA based on self-administered questionnaires and individualised computer-generated feedback reports, combined with nurse and PCP counselling over a 2-y period. Primary outcomes were health behaviours and preventive care use at 2 y and all-cause mortality at 8 y. At baseline, participants in the intervention group had a mean ± standard deviation of 6.9 ± 3.7 risk factors (including unfavourable health behaviours, health and functional impairments, and social risk factors) and 4.3 ± 1.8 deficits in recommended preventive care. At 2 y, favourable health behaviours and use of preventive care were more frequent in the intervention than in the control group (based on z-statistics from generalised estimating equation models). For example, 70% compared to 62% were physically active (odds ratio 1.43, 95% CI 1.16-1.77, p = 0.001), and 66% compared to 59% had influenza vaccinations in the past year (odds ratio 1.35, 95% CI 1.09-1.66, p = 0.005). At 8 y, based on an intention-to-treat analysis, the estimated proportion alive was 77.9% in the intervention and 72.8% in the control group, for an absolute mortality difference of 4.9% (95% CI 1.3%-8.5%, p = 0.009; based on z-test for risk difference). The hazard ratio of death comparing intervention with control was 0.79 (95% CI 0.66-0.94, p = 0.009; based on Wald test from Cox regression model), and the number needed to receive the intervention to prevent one death was 21 (95% CI 12-79). The main limitations of the study include the single-site study design, the use of a brief self-administered questionnaire for 2-y outcome data collection, the unavailability of other long-term outcome data (e.g., functional status, nursing home admissions), and the availability of long-term follow-up data on mortality for analysis only in 2014.METHODS AND FINDINGSThis study was a pragmatic, single-centre randomised controlled clinical trial in community-dwelling individuals aged 65 y or older registered with one of 19 primary care physician (PCP) practices in a mixed rural and urban area in Switzerland. From November 2000 to January 2002, 874 participants were randomly allocated to the intervention and 1,410 to usual care. The intervention consisted of HRA based on self-administered questionnaires and individualised computer-generated feedback reports, combined with nurse and PCP counselling over a 2-y period. Primary outcomes were health behaviours and preventive care use at 2 y and all-cause mortality at 8 y. At baseline, participants in the intervention group had a mean ± standard deviation of 6.9 ± 3.7 risk factors (including unfavourable health behaviours, health and functional impairments, and social risk factors) and 4.3 ± 1.8 deficits in recommended preventive care. At 2 y, favourable health behaviours and use of preventive care were more frequent in the intervention than in the control group (based on z-statistics from generalised estimating equation models). For example, 70% compared to 62% were physically active (odds ratio 1.43, 95% CI 1.16-1.77, p = 0.001), and 66% compared to 59% had influenza vaccinations in the past year (odds ratio 1.35, 95% CI 1.09-1.66, p = 0.005). At 8 y, based on an intention-to-treat analysis, the estimated proportion alive was 77.9% in the intervention and 72.8% in the control group, for an absolute mortality difference of 4.9% (95% CI 1.3%-8.5%, p = 0.009; based on z-test for risk difference). The hazard ratio of death comparing intervention with control was 0.79 (95% CI 0.66-0.94, p = 0.009; based on Wald test from Cox regression model), and the number needed to receive the intervention to prevent one death was 21 (95% CI 12-79). The main limitations of the study include the single-site study design, the use of a brief self-administered questionnaire for 2-y outcome data collection, the unavailability of other long-term outcome data (e.g., functional status, nursing home admissions), and the availability of long-term follow-up data on mortality for analysis only in 2014.This is the first trial to our knowledge demonstrating that a collaborative care model of HRA in community-dwelling older people not only results in better health behaviours and increased use of recommended preventive care interventions, but also improves survival. The intervention tested in our study may serve as a model of how to implement a relatively low-cost but effective programme of disease prevention and health promotion in older individuals.CONCLUSIONSThis is the first trial to our knowledge demonstrating that a collaborative care model of HRA in community-dwelling older people not only results in better health behaviours and increased use of recommended preventive care interventions, but also improves survival. The intervention tested in our study may serve as a model of how to implement a relatively low-cost but effective programme of disease prevention and health promotion in older individuals.International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number: ISRCTN 28458424.TRIAL REGISTRATIONInternational Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number: ISRCTN 28458424. Potentially avoidable risk factors continue to cause unnecessary disability and premature death in older people. Health risk assessment (HRA), a method successfully used in working-age populations, is a promising method for cost-effective health promotion and preventive care in older individuals, but the long-term effects of this approach are unknown. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of an innovative approach to HRA and counselling in older individuals for health behaviours, preventive care, and long-term survival. This study was a pragmatic, single-centre randomised controlled clinical trial in community-dwelling individuals aged 65 y or older registered with one of 19 primary care physician (PCP) practices in a mixed rural and urban area in Switzerland. From November 2000 to January 2002, 874 participants were randomly allocated to the intervention and 1,410 to usual care. The intervention consisted of HRA based on self-administered questionnaires and individualised computer-generated feedback reports, combined with nurse and PCP counselling over a 2-y period. Primary outcomes were health behaviours and preventive care use at 2 y and all-cause mortality at 8 y. At baseline, participants in the intervention group had a mean [+ or -] standard deviation of 6.9 [+ or -] 3.7 risk factors (including unfavourable health behaviours, health and functional impairments, and social risk factors) and 4.3 [+ or -] 1.8 deficits in recommended preventive care. At 2 y, favourable health behaviours and use of preventive care were more frequent in the intervention than in the control group (based on z-statistics from generalised estimating equation models). For example, 70% compared to 62% were physically active (odds ratio 1.43, 95% CI 1.16-1.77, p = 0.001), and 66% compared to 59% had influenza vaccinations in the past year (odds ratio 1.35, 95% CI 1.09-1.66, p = 0.005). At 8 y, based on an intention-to-treat analysis, the estimated proportion alive was 77.9% in the intervention and 72.8% in the control group, for an absolute mortality difference of 4.9% (95% CI 1.3%-8.5%, p = 0.009; based on z-test for risk difference). The hazard ratio of death comparing intervention with control was 0.79 (95% CI 0.66-0.94, p = 0.009; based on Wald test from Cox regression model), and the number needed to receive the intervention to prevent one death was 21 (95% CI 12-79). The main limitations of the study include the single-site study design, the use of a brief self-administered questionnaire for 2-y outcome data collection, the unavailability of other long-term outcome data (e.g., functional status, nursing home admissions), and the availability of long-term follow-up data on mortality for analysis only in 2014. This is the first trial to our knowledge demonstrating that a collaborative care model of HRA in community-dwelling older people not only results in better health behaviours and increased use of recommended preventive care interventions, but also improves survival. The intervention tested in our study may serve as a model of how to implement a relatively low-cost but effective programme of disease prevention and health promotion in older individuals. Background Potentially avoidable risk factors continue to cause unnecessary disability and premature death in older people. Health risk assessment (HRA), a method successfully used in working-age populations, is a promising method for cost-effective health promotion and preventive care in older individuals, but the long-term effects of this approach are unknown. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of an innovative approach to HRA and counselling in older individuals for health behaviours, preventive care, and long-term survival. Methods and Findings This study was a pragmatic, single-centre randomised controlled clinical trial in community-dwelling individuals aged 65 y or older registered with one of 19 primary care physician (PCP) practices in a mixed rural and urban area in Switzerland. From November 2000 to January 2002, 874 participants were randomly allocated to the intervention and 1,410 to usual care. The intervention consisted of HRA based on self-administered questionnaires and individualised computer-generated feedback reports, combined with nurse and PCP counselling over a 2-y period. Primary outcomes were health behaviours and preventive care use at 2 y and all-cause mortality at 8 y. At baseline, participants in the intervention group had a mean [+ or -] standard deviation of 6.9 [+ or -] 3.7 risk factors (including unfavourable health behaviours, health and functional impairments, and social risk factors) and 4.3 [+ or -] 1.8 deficits in recommended preventive care. At 2 y, favourable health behaviours and use of preventive care were more frequent in the intervention than in the control group (based on z-statistics from generalised estimating equation models). For example, 70% compared to 62% were physically active (odds ratio 1.43, 95% CI 1.16-1.77, p = 0.001), and 66% compared to 59% had influenza vaccinations in the past year (odds ratio 1.35, 95% CI 1.09-1.66, p = 0.005). At 8 y, based on an intention-to-treat analysis, the estimated proportion alive was 77.9% in the intervention and 72.8% in the control group, for an absolute mortality difference of 4.9% (95% CI 1.3%-8.5%, p = 0.009; based on z-test for risk difference). The hazard ratio of death comparing intervention with control was 0.79 (95% CI 0.66-0.94, p = 0.009; based on Wald test from Cox regression model), and the number needed to receive the intervention to prevent one death was 21 (95% CI 12-79). The main limitations of the study include the single-site study design, the use of a brief self-administered questionnaire for 2-y outcome data collection, the unavailability of other long-term outcome data (e.g., functional status, nursing home admissions), and the availability of long-term follow-up data on mortality for analysis only in 2014. Conclusions This is the first trial to our knowledge demonstrating that a collaborative care model of HRA in community-dwelling older people not only results in better health behaviours and increased use of recommended preventive care interventions, but also improves survival. The intervention tested in our study may serve as a model of how to implement a relatively low-cost but effective programme of disease prevention and health promotion in older individuals. Trial Registration International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number: ISRCTN 28458424 Potentially avoidable risk factors continue to cause unnecessary disability and premature death in older people. Health risk assessment (HRA), a method successfully used in working-age populations, is a promising method for cost-effective health promotion and preventive care in older individuals, but the long-term effects of this approach are unknown. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of an innovative approach to HRA and counselling in older individuals for health behaviours, preventive care, and long-term survival. This study was a pragmatic, single-centre randomised controlled clinical trial in community-dwelling individuals aged 65 y or older registered with one of 19 primary care physician (PCP) practices in a mixed rural and urban area in Switzerland. From November 2000 to January 2002, 874 participants were randomly allocated to the intervention and 1,410 to usual care. The intervention consisted of HRA based on self-administered questionnaires and individualised computer-generated feedback reports, combined with nurse and PCP counselling over a 2-y period. Primary outcomes were health behaviours and preventive care use at 2 y and all-cause mortality at 8 y. At baseline, participants in the intervention group had a mean ± standard deviation of 6.9 ± 3.7 risk factors (including unfavourable health behaviours, health and functional impairments, and social risk factors) and 4.3 ± 1.8 deficits in recommended preventive care. At 2 y, favourable health behaviours and use of preventive care were more frequent in the intervention than in the control group (based on z-statistics from generalised estimating equation models). For example, 70% compared to 62% were physically active (odds ratio 1.43, 95% CI 1.16-1.77, p = 0.001), and 66% compared to 59% had influenza vaccinations in the past year (odds ratio 1.35, 95% CI 1.09-1.66, p = 0.005). At 8 y, based on an intention-to-treat analysis, the estimated proportion alive was 77.9% in the intervention and 72.8% in the control group, for an absolute mortality difference of 4.9% (95% CI 1.3%-8.5%, p = 0.009; based on z-test for risk difference). The hazard ratio of death comparing intervention with control was 0.79 (95% CI 0.66-0.94, p = 0.009; based on Wald test from Cox regression model), and the number needed to receive the intervention to prevent one death was 21 (95% CI 12-79). The main limitations of the study include the single-site study design, the use of a brief self-administered questionnaire for 2-y outcome data collection, the unavailability of other long-term outcome data (e.g., functional status, nursing home admissions), and the availability of long-term follow-up data on mortality for analysis only in 2014. This is the first trial to our knowledge demonstrating that a collaborative care model of HRA in community-dwelling older people not only results in better health behaviours and increased use of recommended preventive care interventions, but also improves survival. The intervention tested in our study may serve as a model of how to implement a relatively low-cost but effective programme of disease prevention and health promotion in older individuals. International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number: ISRCTN 28458424. BackgroundPotentially avoidable risk factors continue to cause unnecessary disability and premature death in older people. Health risk assessment (HRA), a method successfully used in working-age populations, is a promising method for cost-effective health promotion and preventive care in older individuals, but the long-term effects of this approach are unknown. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of an innovative approach to HRA and counselling in older individuals for health behaviours, preventive care, and long-term survival.Methods and findingsThis study was a pragmatic, single-centre randomised controlled clinical trial in community-dwelling individuals aged 65 y or older registered with one of 19 primary care physician (PCP) practices in a mixed rural and urban area in Switzerland. From November 2000 to January 2002, 874 participants were randomly allocated to the intervention and 1,410 to usual care. The intervention consisted of HRA based on self-administered questionnaires and individualised computer-generated feedback reports, combined with nurse and PCP counselling over a 2-y period. Primary outcomes were health behaviours and preventive care use at 2 y and all-cause mortality at 8 y. At baseline, participants in the intervention group had a mean ± standard deviation of 6.9 ± 3.7 risk factors (including unfavourable health behaviours, health and functional impairments, and social risk factors) and 4.3 ± 1.8 deficits in recommended preventive care. At 2 y, favourable health behaviours and use of preventive care were more frequent in the intervention than in the control group (based on z-statistics from generalised estimating equation models). For example, 70% compared to 62% were physically active (odds ratio 1.43, 95% CI 1.16-1.77, p = 0.001), and 66% compared to 59% had influenza vaccinations in the past year (odds ratio 1.35, 95% CI 1.09-1.66, p = 0.005). At 8 y, based on an intention-to-treat analysis, the estimated proportion alive was 77.9% in the intervention and 72.8% in the control group, for an absolute mortality difference of 4.9% (95% CI 1.3%-8.5%, p = 0.009; based on z-test for risk difference). The hazard ratio of death comparing intervention with control was 0.79 (95% CI 0.66-0.94, p = 0.009; based on Wald test from Cox regression model), and the number needed to receive the intervention to prevent one death was 21 (95% CI 12-79). The main limitations of the study include the single-site study design, the use of a brief self-administered questionnaire for 2-y outcome data collection, the unavailability of other long-term outcome data (e.g., functional status, nursing home admissions), and the availability of long-term follow-up data on mortality for analysis only in 2014.ConclusionsThis is the first trial to our knowledge demonstrating that a collaborative care model of HRA in community-dwelling older people not only results in better health behaviours and increased use of recommended preventive care interventions, but also improves survival. The intervention tested in our study may serve as a model of how to implement a relatively low-cost but effective programme of disease prevention and health promotion in older individuals.Trial registrationInternational Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number: ISRCTN 28458424. Background Potentially avoidable risk factors continue to cause unnecessary disability and premature death in older people. Health risk assessment (HRA), a method successfully used in working-age populations, is a promising method for cost-effective health promotion and preventive care in older individuals, but the long-term effects of this approach are unknown. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of an innovative approach to HRA and counselling in older individuals for health behaviours, preventive care, and long-term survival. Methods and Findings This study was a pragmatic, single-centre randomised controlled clinical trial in community-dwelling individuals aged 65 y or older registered with one of 19 primary care physician (PCP) practices in a mixed rural and urban area in Switzerland. From November 2000 to January 2002, 874 participants were randomly allocated to the intervention and 1,410 to usual care. The intervention consisted of HRA based on self-administered questionnaires and individualised computer-generated feedback reports, combined with nurse and PCP counselling over a 2-y period. Primary outcomes were health behaviours and preventive care use at 2 y and all-cause mortality at 8 y. At baseline, participants in the intervention group had a mean ± standard deviation of 6.9 ± 3.7 risk factors (including unfavourable health behaviours, health and functional impairments, and social risk factors) and 4.3 ± 1.8 deficits in recommended preventive care. At 2 y, favourable health behaviours and use of preventive care were more frequent in the intervention than in the control group (based on z-statistics from generalised estimating equation models). For example, 70% compared to 62% were physically active (odds ratio 1.43, 95% CI 1.16-1.77, p = 0.001), and 66% compared to 59% had influenza vaccinations in the past year (odds ratio 1.35, 95% CI 1.09-1.66, p = 0.005). At 8 y, based on an intention-to-treat analysis, the estimated proportion alive was 77.9% in the intervention and 72.8% in the control group, for an absolute mortality difference of 4.9% (95% CI 1.3%-8.5%, p = 0.009; based on z-test for risk difference). The hazard ratio of death comparing intervention with control was 0.79 (95% CI 0.66-0.94, p = 0.009; based on Wald test from Cox regression model), and the number needed to receive the intervention to prevent one death was 21 (95% CI 12-79). The main limitations of the study include the single-site study design, the use of a brief self-administered questionnaire for 2-y outcome data collection, the unavailability of other long-term outcome data (e.g., functional status, nursing home admissions), and the availability of long-term follow-up data on mortality for analysis only in 2014. Conclusions This is the first trial to our knowledge demonstrating that a collaborative care model of HRA in community-dwelling older people not only results in better health behaviours and increased use of recommended preventive care interventions, but also improves survival. The intervention tested in our study may serve as a model of how to implement a relatively low-cost but effective programme of disease prevention and health promotion in older individuals. Trial Registration International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number: ISRCTN 28458424 In a randomized trial, Andreas Stuck and colleagues assess the benefits of a collaborative care intervention to health behaviors and survival among elderly participants in Solothurn, Switzerland. |
| Audience | Academic |
| Author | Wyser, Joseph Egger, Matthias Zwahlen, Marcel Gillmann, Gerhard Swift, Cameron Harari, Danielle Moser, André Beck, John C. Iliffe, Steve Morf, Ueli Stuck, Andreas E. Born, Stephan Wirz, Urban |
| AuthorAffiliation | 6 Clinical Age Research Unit, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom Stanford University, UNITED STATES 8 Langley Research Institute, Los Angeles, California, United States of America 5 Department of Ageing and Health, St. Thomas’ Hospital, London, United Kingdom 1 Department of Geriatrics, Inselspital, University Hospital Bern and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland 3 Institute of Primary Care, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland 4 Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom 7 University of California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America 2 Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland |
| AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: 5 Department of Ageing and Health, St. Thomas’ Hospital, London, United Kingdom – name: 4 Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom – name: 7 University of California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America – name: 8 Langley Research Institute, Los Angeles, California, United States of America – name: 3 Institute of Primary Care, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland – name: 6 Clinical Age Research Unit, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom – name: Stanford University, UNITED STATES – name: 2 Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland – name: 1 Department of Geriatrics, Inselspital, University Hospital Bern and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Andreas E. surname: Stuck fullname: Stuck, Andreas E. – sequence: 2 givenname: André surname: Moser fullname: Moser, André – sequence: 3 givenname: Ueli surname: Morf fullname: Morf, Ueli – sequence: 4 givenname: Urban surname: Wirz fullname: Wirz, Urban – sequence: 5 givenname: Joseph surname: Wyser fullname: Wyser, Joseph – sequence: 6 givenname: Gerhard surname: Gillmann fullname: Gillmann, Gerhard – sequence: 7 givenname: Stephan surname: Born fullname: Born, Stephan – sequence: 8 givenname: Marcel surname: Zwahlen fullname: Zwahlen, Marcel – sequence: 9 givenname: Steve surname: Iliffe fullname: Iliffe, Steve – sequence: 10 givenname: Danielle surname: Harari fullname: Harari, Danielle – sequence: 11 givenname: Cameron surname: Swift fullname: Swift, Cameron – sequence: 12 givenname: John C. surname: Beck fullname: Beck, John C. – sequence: 13 givenname: Matthias surname: Egger fullname: Egger, Matthias |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26479077$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNqVk11v0zAUhiM0xD7gHyCwNAnBRYudOHGyC6QyDTZpYtM2uLVc-zj1cO1iJxVc8ddx1hataEKgXDiyn_f18fnYz3acd5Blzwkek4KRt7e-D07Y8WIOakwwJnXdPMr2SEmbEalYtXPvfzfbj_EW47zBDX6S7eYVZQ1mbC_7eaI1yA55jU5B2G6Grkz8iiYxQoxzcB0STqFj37sI1hrXIu825HuYiaVJYdwx131YmqWwyDh0YRUEdAl-YeEITdBlEO1cdEaiq4T6uYmg0E0wwj7NHmthIzxbrwfZ5w8nN8eno_OLj2fHk_ORZEXVjUQNakol0GlZS1koyIEVuS5oqaZMC0qYqklTF7oEWkyJSEitGwaqalRZqqo4yF6ufBfWR77OXeSEFcmjwcVAnK0I5cUtXwQzF-EH98Lwuw0fWi5CeoIFToDlU1GqUlBNSdXUFWhdy0oUQgpM8-T1bn1bP03lkSmPQdgt0-0TZ2a89UtOK4Ir1iSD12uD4L_1EDueciZTBYQD3w9x5yXOaUNoQg9XaCtSaMZpnxzlgPMJLSgllJSD4egBqgUH6frUWNqk7S1-_ACfPgVzIx8UvNkSJKaD710r-hj52fXVf7Cf_p29-LLNvrrHzu66NHrbd8a7uA2-uF-f34XZzEUCjlaADD7GAJpL04nBJ6XBWE4wH4Zw00h8GEK-HsIkpn-IN_5_lf0CduE2Aw |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1186_s41687_020_0183_5 crossref_primary_10_1177_2057158519856495 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph17239146 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12603_017_0932_1 crossref_primary_10_1093_ndt_gfaa018 crossref_primary_10_1093_ageing_afx151 crossref_primary_10_1111_ggi_15088 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gerinurse_2018_06_002 crossref_primary_10_1177_1724600818816995 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gerinurse_2019_06_001 crossref_primary_10_1177_0193945917740705 crossref_primary_10_2196_47179 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_eurger_2017_07_022 crossref_primary_10_3390_jpm12030467 crossref_primary_10_1177_0898264317719130 crossref_primary_10_3390_nu14091963 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0158714 crossref_primary_10_1093_ageing_afac287 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2020_038342 crossref_primary_10_2196_41870 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00391_017_1264_9 crossref_primary_10_1007_s15006_015_3693_y crossref_primary_10_1080_10255842_2025_2514802 crossref_primary_10_1123_japa_2021_0111 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10389_017_0888_y crossref_primary_10_1016_j_amepre_2019_10_021 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0181371 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12126_024_09567_8 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10433_017_0422_7 crossref_primary_10_1177_0898264318804946 crossref_primary_10_1080_09593985_2021_1934927 crossref_primary_10_1111_scs_12923 crossref_primary_10_1093_ageing_afv185 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12913_017_2122_6 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jamda_2023_03_018 crossref_primary_10_1093_pubmed_fdaf008 crossref_primary_10_1146_annurev_publhealth_052620_093049 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0175272 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12875_017_0620_6 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12603_020_1373_9 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_vaccine_2020_12_014 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_amepre_2017_11_010 crossref_primary_10_1002_14651858_CD011589_pub2 crossref_primary_10_1177_0193945916660341 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmj_2023_077764 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1001/jama.2013.3469 10.1093/gerona/55.1.M43 10.1001/archinte.1992.00400180067010 10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.06.017 10.1093/aje/kwq137 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1997.tb03097.x 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001265 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001441 10.1093/ageing/31.6.463 10.1001/jama.2012.339 10.1371/journal.pone.0089257 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.10.030 10.1001/jama.2013.5039 10.1136/bmj.310.6977.452 10.1186/1471-2288-7-2 10.1002/9780470316696 10.1097/EDE.0b013e318230e861 10.1001/jama.1963.03060120024016 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.0533 10.2105/AJPH.77.4.409 10.1093/biomet/67.1.145 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61766-8 10.1093/ageing/afn150 10.1186/1471-2288-7-1 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.02.009 10.1136/bmj.317.7168.1309 10.1056/NEJM198812293192604 10.4278/0890-1171-11.5.337 10.1136/jech-2011-200699 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00370-0 10.1093/ije/dyn042 10.1007/978-1-4757-3454-6 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001783 10.1093/gerona/glr021 10.4278/0890-1171-12.1.38 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | COPYRIGHT 2015 Public Library of Science 2015 Stuck et al 2015 Stuck et al 2015 Public Library of Science. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited: Stuck AE, Moser A, Morf U, Wirz U, Wyser J, Gillmann G, et al. (2015) Effect of Health Risk Assessment and Counselling on Health Behaviour and Survival in Older People: A Pragmatic Randomised Trial. PLoS Med 12(10): e1001889. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001889 |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: COPYRIGHT 2015 Public Library of Science – notice: 2015 Stuck et al 2015 Stuck et al – notice: 2015 Public Library of Science. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited: Stuck AE, Moser A, Morf U, Wirz U, Wyser J, Gillmann G, et al. (2015) Effect of Health Risk Assessment and Counselling on Health Behaviour and Survival in Older People: A Pragmatic Randomised Trial. PLoS Med 12(10): e1001889. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001889 |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM IOV ISN ISR 7X8 5PM DOA CZK |
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001889 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints Gale In Context: Canada Gale In Context: Science MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals PLoS Medicine |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: 7X8 name: MEDLINE - Academic url: https://search.proquest.com/medline sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Medicine |
| DocumentTitleAlternate | Health Risk Assessment and Counselling in Older Persons |
| EISSN | 1549-1676 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 1733459036 oai_doaj_org_article_1e72ba5d5a4f416986eff8c6a3aca042 PMC4610679 A434414159 26479077 10_1371_journal_pmed_1001889 |
| Genre | Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article |
| GeographicLocations | Switzerland United Kingdom |
| GeographicLocations_xml | – name: Switzerland – name: United Kingdom |
| GroupedDBID | --- 123 29O 2WC 53G 5VS 7X7 88E 8FI 8FJ AAFWJ AAUCC AAWOE AAWTL AAYXX ABDBF ABUWG ACCTH ACGFO ACIHN ACPRK ACUHS ADBBV ADRAZ AEAQA AENEX AFFHD AFKRA AFPKN AFRAH AFXKF AHMBA AKRSQ ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AOIJS B0M BAIFH BAWUL BBTPI BCNDV BENPR BPHCQ BVXVI BWKFM CCPQU CITATION CS3 DIK DU5 E3Z EAP EAS EBD EBS EJD EMK EMOBN ESX F5P FPL FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HMCUK HYE IAO IHR IHW INH INR IOF IOV IPO ISN ISR ITC KQ8 M1P M48 MK0 O5R O5S OK1 OVT P2P PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PPXIY PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO PV9 RNS RPM RZL SV3 TR2 TUS UKHRP WOW XSB YZZ ~8M ADXHL ALIPV CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF H13 IPNFZ NPM RIG WOQ 7X8 PUEGO 5PM 3V. AAPBV ABPTK BCGST CZK ICW M~E N95 PQEST PQUKI |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c736t-a8edb4ce4b58cc3de2e732f345db7fa417d81983f5e43b1ac3d8f97ed69d55d63 |
| IEDL.DBID | DOA |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 50 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000364466600007&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 1549-1676 1549-1277 |
| IngestDate | Sun Jul 02 11:04:25 EDT 2023 Fri Oct 03 12:53:23 EDT 2025 Tue Nov 04 01:59:27 EST 2025 Thu Oct 02 11:07:54 EDT 2025 Tue Nov 11 10:26:09 EST 2025 Sat Nov 29 11:35:54 EST 2025 Tue Nov 04 18:03:54 EST 2025 Thu Nov 13 15:23:13 EST 2025 Thu Nov 13 14:55:20 EST 2025 Thu Nov 13 15:53:20 EST 2025 Thu May 22 21:21:04 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 05:55:20 EDT 2025 Sat Nov 29 05:44:04 EST 2025 Tue Nov 18 22:12:07 EST 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 10 |
| Language | English |
| License | This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. Creative Commons Attribution License |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c736t-a8edb4ce4b58cc3de2e732f345db7fa417d81983f5e43b1ac3d8f97ed69d55d63 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 Conceived and designed the experiments: AES JCB. Performed the experiments: AES UM UW JW SB. Analyzed the data: AES AM GG MZ ME. Wrote the first draft of the manuscript: AES. Contributed to the writing of the manuscript: AES AM UM UW JW GG SB MZ SI DH CS JCB ME. Enrolled patients: UM UW JW SB GG. Agree with the manuscript’s results and conclusions: AES AM UM UW JW GG SB MZ SI DH CS JCB ME. Designed the intervention: AES SB SI DH CS JCB. Helped with data linkage: AES AM SB MZ ME. All authors have read, and confirm that they meet, ICMJE criteria for authorship. These authors are joint senior authors on this work. The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. |
| OpenAccessLink | https://doaj.org/article/1e72ba5d5a4f416986eff8c6a3aca042 |
| PMID | 26479077 |
| PQID | 1725024914 |
| PQPubID | 23479 |
| ParticipantIDs | plos_journals_1733459036 doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_1e72ba5d5a4f416986eff8c6a3aca042 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4610679 proquest_miscellaneous_1725024914 gale_infotracmisc_A434414159 gale_infotracgeneralonefile_A434414159 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A434414159 gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A434414159 gale_incontextgauss_ISN_A434414159 gale_incontextgauss_IOV_A434414159 gale_healthsolutions_A434414159 pubmed_primary_26479077 crossref_citationtrail_10_1371_journal_pmed_1001889 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pmed_1001889 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2015-10-01 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2015-10-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 10 year: 2015 text: 2015-10-01 day: 01 |
| PublicationDecade | 2010 |
| PublicationPlace | United States |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States – name: San Francisco, CA USA |
| PublicationTitle | PLoS medicine |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | PLoS Med |
| PublicationYear | 2015 |
| Publisher | Public Library of Science Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Public Library of Science – name: Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| References | ref13 ref35 ref12 ref34 ref15 ref37 ref14 ref36 ref31 ref30 ref11 ref33 ref10 ref32 ref2 ref1 ref17 ref39 ref16 ref38 ref19 ref18 ref24 ref23 ref26 ref25 ref20 ref42 ref41 ref22 ref21 ref43 ref28 ref27 ref29 ref8 ref7 ref9 ref4 ref3 ref6 ref5 ref40 25689364 - PLoS Med. 2015 Feb;12(2):e1001783 9804726 - BMJ. 1998 Nov 7;317(7168):1309-12 10719772 - J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2000 Jan;55(1):M43-52 12446293 - Age Ageing. 2002 Nov;31(6):463-7 1599348 - Arch Intern Med. 1992 Jun;152(6):1201-6 24622676 - PLoS One. 2014;9(3):e89257 14044222 - JAMA. 1963 Sep 21;185:914-9 3826457 - Am J Public Health. 1987 Apr;77(4):409-11 22815653 - PLoS Med. 2012;9(7):e1001265 9158585 - J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997 May;45(5):614-7 1202204 - J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189-98 22427615 - JAMA. 2012 Mar 28;307(12):1273-83 18755784 - Age Ageing. 2008 Sep;37(5):565-71 21350242 - J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2011 May;66(5):591-8 24768004 - J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Jul;67(7):734-44 10170434 - Am J Health Promot. 1997 Sep-Oct;12(1):38-48 7873954 - BMJ. 1995 Feb 18;310(6977):452-4 20616200 - Am J Epidemiol. 2010 Aug 15;172(4):478-87 21989136 - Epidemiology. 2012 Jan;23(1):119-28 10075171 - Soc Sci Med. 1999 Feb;48(4):445-69 25844730 - JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Jun;175(6):959-67 20117610 - Am J Prev Med. 2010 Feb;38(2 Suppl):S237-62 23245609 - Lancet. 2012 Dec 15;380(9859):2224-60 22735042 - Prev Med. 2012 Sep;55(3):163-70 22717282 - J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012 Dec;66(12):1129-36 17217545 - BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007;7:1 17217546 - BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007;7:2 23780462 - JAMA. 2013 Jun 19;309(23):2489-90 10167368 - Am J Health Promot. 1997 May-Jun;11(5):337-43 3205267 - N Engl J Med. 1988 Dec 29;319(26):1701-7 18326512 - Int J Epidemiol. 2009 Apr;38(2):379-84 23674929 - PLoS Med. 2013 May;10(5):e1001441 23588385 - JAMA. 2013 May 8;309(18):1893-4 |
| References_xml | – ident: ref42 doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.3469 – ident: ref36 doi: 10.1093/gerona/55.1.M43 – ident: ref3 – ident: ref26 doi: 10.1001/archinte.1992.00400180067010 – ident: ref7 – ident: ref39 doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.06.017 – ident: ref29 doi: 10.1093/aje/kwq137 – ident: ref23 doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1997.tb03097.x – ident: ref4 doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001265 – ident: ref43 doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001441 – ident: ref22 doi: 10.1093/ageing/31.6.463 – ident: ref27 – ident: ref40 doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.339 – ident: ref6 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089257 – ident: ref10 doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.10.030 – ident: ref5 doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.5039 – ident: ref33 doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6977.452 – ident: ref15 doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-7-2 – ident: ref28 doi: 10.1002/9780470316696 – ident: ref30 doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e318230e861 – ident: ref16 doi: 10.1001/jama.1963.03060120024016 – ident: ref11 – ident: ref38 doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.0533 – ident: ref9 doi: 10.2105/AJPH.77.4.409 – ident: ref32 doi: 10.1093/biomet/67.1.145 – ident: ref1 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61766-8 – ident: ref2 – ident: ref12 doi: 10.1093/ageing/afn150 – ident: ref14 doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-7-1 – ident: ref37 doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.02.009 – ident: ref34 doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7168.1309 – ident: ref21 – ident: ref35 doi: 10.1056/NEJM198812293192604 – ident: ref19 doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-11.5.337 – ident: ref25 doi: 10.1136/jech-2011-200699 – ident: ref17 doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 – ident: ref18 doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00370-0 – ident: ref24 doi: 10.1093/ije/dyn042 – ident: ref31 doi: 10.1007/978-1-4757-3454-6 – ident: ref8 – ident: ref41 doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001783 – ident: ref13 doi: 10.1093/gerona/glr021 – ident: ref20 doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-12.1.38 – reference: 7873954 - BMJ. 1995 Feb 18;310(6977):452-4 – reference: 21989136 - Epidemiology. 2012 Jan;23(1):119-28 – reference: 24622676 - PLoS One. 2014;9(3):e89257 – reference: 22815653 - PLoS Med. 2012;9(7):e1001265 – reference: 18755784 - Age Ageing. 2008 Sep;37(5):565-71 – reference: 14044222 - JAMA. 1963 Sep 21;185:914-9 – reference: 22735042 - Prev Med. 2012 Sep;55(3):163-70 – reference: 12446293 - Age Ageing. 2002 Nov;31(6):463-7 – reference: 17217546 - BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007;7:2 – reference: 3826457 - Am J Public Health. 1987 Apr;77(4):409-11 – reference: 1599348 - Arch Intern Med. 1992 Jun;152(6):1201-6 – reference: 25689364 - PLoS Med. 2015 Feb;12(2):e1001783 – reference: 23245609 - Lancet. 2012 Dec 15;380(9859):2224-60 – reference: 10170434 - Am J Health Promot. 1997 Sep-Oct;12(1):38-48 – reference: 10167368 - Am J Health Promot. 1997 May-Jun;11(5):337-43 – reference: 23588385 - JAMA. 2013 May 8;309(18):1893-4 – reference: 22427615 - JAMA. 2012 Mar 28;307(12):1273-83 – reference: 23674929 - PLoS Med. 2013 May;10(5):e1001441 – reference: 10719772 - J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2000 Jan;55(1):M43-52 – reference: 22717282 - J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012 Dec;66(12):1129-36 – reference: 9158585 - J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997 May;45(5):614-7 – reference: 20616200 - Am J Epidemiol. 2010 Aug 15;172(4):478-87 – reference: 1202204 - J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189-98 – reference: 9804726 - BMJ. 1998 Nov 7;317(7168):1309-12 – reference: 25844730 - JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Jun;175(6):959-67 – reference: 24768004 - J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Jul;67(7):734-44 – reference: 3205267 - N Engl J Med. 1988 Dec 29;319(26):1701-7 – reference: 10075171 - Soc Sci Med. 1999 Feb;48(4):445-69 – reference: 21350242 - J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2011 May;66(5):591-8 – reference: 17217545 - BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007;7:1 – reference: 18326512 - Int J Epidemiol. 2009 Apr;38(2):379-84 – reference: 20117610 - Am J Prev Med. 2010 Feb;38(2 Suppl):S237-62 – reference: 23780462 - JAMA. 2013 Jun 19;309(23):2489-90 |
| SSID | ssj0029090 |
| Score | 2.3887215 |
| Snippet | Potentially avoidable risk factors continue to cause unnecessary disability and premature death in older people. Health risk assessment (HRA), a method... Background Potentially avoidable risk factors continue to cause unnecessary disability and premature death in older people. Health risk assessment (HRA), a... In a randomized trial, Andreas Stuck and colleagues assess the benefits of a collaborative care intervention to health behaviors and survival among elderly... BackgroundPotentially avoidable risk factors continue to cause unnecessary disability and premature death in older people. Health risk assessment (HRA), a... Background Potentially avoidable risk factors continue to cause unnecessary disability and premature death in older people. Health risk assessment (HRA), a... |
| SourceID | plos doaj pubmedcentral proquest gale pubmed crossref |
| SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
| StartPage | e1001889 |
| SubjectTerms | Age groups Aged Analysis Clinical trials Counseling Feedback Female Geriatric Assessment - methods German language Health Behavior Health care Health promotion Health risk assessment Humans Immunization Influenza Male Mortality Mortality - trends Older people Population Pragmatism Prevention Preventive Health Services - utilization Preventive medicine Questionnaires Researchers Risk Assessment - methods Risk Factors Sensitivity analysis Surveys and Questionnaires Survival Analysis Switzerland - epidemiology Urban areas |
| SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access dbid: FPL link: http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1bb9MwFLagIMQLd1hggEEInjKa2rFj3gpiAml0VTfQ3izHl1IxJVXT8spf59hxA5k2MV7rz2p0bj5HPuczQq80nPq2pCZljtiUlkykQpU0NUMCO5yxxARNH_DJpDg5EdM_heKZG3zCs7dRpntLOB0CY1BRiKvo2ogw5out_elBV2CJoRjG8biLdvaOn8DS38XiwfK0bs5LNM_2S_51AO3f_t9Pv4NuxVQTj1vbuIuu2OoeuvElXqbfR79a5mJcO9wOI-HZovmBxx1XJ1aVwXFo3U-t47raIiOt4mYVMEcbCDhgsnhR4UP_7Deehsb0d3iMpys1D7SweAbQGszKGnzszf4B-rr_8fjDpzS-x5BqTtg6VYU1JdWWlnmhNTF2ZDkZOUJzU3KnaMYN5BcFcbmlpMwUQAonuDVMmDw3jDxEg6qu7A7CI8JtbmBdlIpqDZGOMVFQ7Qm4tM7yBJGtmqSOZOX-zYxTGW7gOBQtrRCll62Msk1Q2u1atmQd_8C_9xbQYT3VdvgBlCij58rM8lGpcpMr6iB7FQWzzhWaKaK0gpCXoOfefmQ7t9oFDDmmBFJNyI_gb14GhKfbqHw_z1xtmkZ-Pvx2CdDR5DKgWQ_0JoJcDTLTKg5agOQ911cP-bqHnLdM5-cBd3tAsBXdW97xvrOVcSMzTsAqBGRHCXqx9Sfpd_mWvsrWG4-B7BuK_4wm6FHrX50iIEvnYsh5gnjP83qa6q9Ui--BHN2_H8C4eHzxJz1BNyHrzduOzF00WK829im6rn-uF83qWYgovwHP5ner priority: 102 providerName: Public Library of Science |
| Title | Effect of Health Risk Assessment and Counselling on Health Behaviour and Survival in Older People: A Pragmatic Randomised Trial |
| URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26479077 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1725024914 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC4610679 https://doaj.org/article/1e72ba5d5a4f416986eff8c6a3aca042 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001889 |
| Volume | 12 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos000364466600007&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVAON databaseName: DOAJ Open Access Journals customDbUrl: eissn: 1549-1676 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0029090 issn: 1549-1676 databaseCode: DOA dateStart: 20040101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.doaj.org/ providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Health & Medical Collection customDbUrl: eissn: 1549-1676 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0029090 issn: 1549-1676 databaseCode: 7X7 dateStart: 20041001 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/healthcomplete providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: ProQuest Central customDbUrl: eissn: 1549-1676 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0029090 issn: 1549-1676 databaseCode: BENPR dateStart: 20041001 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.proquest.com/central providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Publicly Available Content Database customDbUrl: eissn: 1549-1676 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0029090 issn: 1549-1676 databaseCode: PIMPY dateStart: 20041001 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://search.proquest.com/publiccontent providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVATS databaseName: Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access customDbUrl: eissn: 1549-1676 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0029090 issn: 1549-1676 databaseCode: FPL dateStart: 20040101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://www.plos.org/publications/ providerName: Public Library of Science |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3db9MwELegIMQL4nuBUQxC8JStqZ045m1Dq5i0lWp8qDxZju2USlNSNQ2v_OucPxo1aNL2wEse4p8V5e58Pid3v0PonYJd3xRUx1lJTEyLjMdcFjTWIwIzSm2Idpo-Y9NpPp_z2U6rL5sT5umBveAOE8PGhUx1KmkJwQPPM1OWucokkUqCxVnvO2J8e5gKRy0-cl9XLP9YnIwZC0VzhCWHQUcHK9htHANRblu872xKjru_89CD1WXdXBV-_ptFubMtTR6iByGexEf-PR6hW6Z6jO6dhz_mT9AfT0-M6xL7kkdsk8mx7Ag5saw0Vr4y3Zam47raIkMJf7t2mKYFrwJ2iZcVrm1vb-yzzz9iiVdruXDcrxi2Pl2D7RiNXUOQp-j75OTbp89xaLoQK0ayTSxzowuqDC3SXCmizdgwMi4JTXXBSkkTpiGIyEmZGkqKRAIkLzkzOuM6TXVGnqFBVVdmD-ExYSbVMM4LSZUCd5aB_qiyLFtKJWmEyFbqQgVGctsY41K432wMTiZeiMLqSgRdRSjuZq08I8c1-GOr0A5r-bTdDbAyEaxMXGdlEXptzUF4-XdeQRxRAvEkBEHwmLcOYTk1Kpu0s5Bt04jTLz9uAPo6vQnoogf6EEBlDTJTMlRTgOQtoVcP-b6HXHg686uA-z0g2IrqDe_ZpbCVcSMSRsAqOIRAEXqzXR7CzrJ5e5WpW4uBEBtO-AmN0HO_XDpFQCjO-IixCLHeQuppqj9SLX85BnTbJCBj_MX_UO1LdB-C4NQnaO6jwWbdmlforvq9WTbrIbrN5sxd8yG6c3wynV0MnauB62R2Bvdmp-ezn38B_EaFzA |
| linkProvider | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| linkToHtml | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Nb9MwGLagIODCN1tgMIMQnDKa2oljbgUxbaLrqq6g3SzHH13FlExNy5W_zmvHjQjaxA7covqxkr7flv0-RuitgqxvCqrjzBIT0yLjMZcFjXWfwAyrDdFe0yM2Huenp3wSKIVcL0yQIKwRz6va7-S7h6o0H4Ikm43TvYSwZAPeu4DE4cmE8pzfRLcYhyTkGB8no3btxfu8HzrnrprZyUyewL8N0z33EZfVoH8fpfwjN-0_-I__6iG6HwpUPGxmPEI3TPkY3TkKW_BP0K-G7xhXFjctTHi6qH_gYcvwiWWpcWh1d73uuCo3yEDGuF56zMkawhQYOl6U-NhdFo4n_jj7RzzEk6WcezJZPAVoBcZoNJ45Z3mKvu1_mX0-iMMtDrFiJFvFMje6oMrQIs2VItoMDCMDS2iqC2YlTZiGqiQnNjWUFIkESG45MzrjOk11Rp6hXgmi2kZ4QJhJNYzzQlKlID5mGc-pcrRdSiVphMhGg0IFinN308a58Pt2DJY6jRCFk60Iso1Q3M66aCg-_oH_5IyjxTqCbv8D6FUEfYrEsEEhU51KaqHm5XlmrM1VJolUEgJlhHadaYmm27UNM2JICRSoUFXBa954hCPpKN0poLlc17U4PP5-DdDJ-DqgaQf0PoBsBTJTMrRngOQdQ1gH-a6DnDf86JcBdzpAsBXVGd52XrCRcS0SRsAqONRUEXq9cTXhZrmDgKWp1g4DNfuA8oRGaKtxvVYRUNsz3mcsQqzjlB1NdUfKxZmnVHe3DmSMP7_6k3bR3YPZ0UiMDsdfX6B7UDenzZnOHdRbLdfmJbqtfq4W9fKVDzy_AQvYkJc |
| linkToPdf | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3Nb9MwFLdGQRMXvmGBwQxC45StqZ045lY-KiZKV3Vj2gVZju101aZkalqu_Os8O05E0CZ24RbVPyfp-_Jz7PczQm8VjPomozpMcmJCmiU85DKjoe4T6JFrQ7TT9JhNJunpKZ9uoB9NLYyXIMwRL8rKreTbi7Iw-16S-5avqF493YsIi5oee5cwejhGoTTlu45xyH4ZW9kCpFvoNuMwlbEskNNxOx_jfd731XTX3agzWjlS_zZ09-yLXZWX_r298o_xanT_P__TB-ieT2TxsL7LQ7Rhikdo85tfqn-MftW8yLjMcV3qhGeL6hwPWyZQLAuNfUm8rYnHZdEgPWnjeukwR2sIZ-AQeFHgQ3uoOJ66be_v8RBPl3LuSGfxDKAlGK3R-Ng61RP0ffT5-OOX0J_2ECpGklUoU6MzqgzN4lQpos3AMDLICY11xnJJI6Yhe0lJHhtKskgCJM05MzrhOo51Qp6iXgHi20J4QJiJNbTzTFKlII4mCU-psvReSkVxgEijVaE8Fbo9keNCuPU9BlOiWojCilp4UQcobHtd1lQg_8B_sAbTYi2Rt_sBdC28jkVk2CCTsY4lzSE35mli8jxViSRSSQioAdqx5ibqqtg2HIkhJZDIQvYFj3njEJbMo7C7heZyXVXi4PDkBqCjyU1Asw7onQflJchMSV_GAZK39tpB7naQ85pH_SrgdgcItqI6zVvWMxoZVyJiBKyCQ-4VoNeN-wnby24YLEy5thjI7QeURzRAz2p3bBUBcwDG-4wFiHUctaOpbkuxOHPU6_Z0goTx59e_0g7anH4aifHB5OsLdBfS67je-rmNeqvl2rxEd9TP1aJavnKx6Dd175_M |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect+of+health+risk+assessment+and+counselling+on+health+behaviour+and+survival+in+older+people%3A+a+pragmatic+randomised+trial&rft.jtitle=PLoS+medicine&rft.au=Andreas+E+Stuck&rft.au=Andr%C3%A9+Moser&rft.au=Ueli+Morf&rft.au=Urban+Wirz&rft.date=2015-10-01&rft.pub=Public+Library+of+Science+%28PLoS%29&rft.issn=1549-1277&rft.eissn=1549-1676&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=e1001889&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.1001889&rft.externalDBID=DOA&rft.externalDocID=oai_doaj_org_article_1e72ba5d5a4f416986eff8c6a3aca042 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1549-1676&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1549-1676&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1549-1676&client=summon |