comparative framework for broad‐scale plot‐based vegetation classification

AIMS: Classification of vegetation is an essential tool to describe, understand, predict and manage biodiversity. Given the multiplicity of approaches to classify vegetation, it is important to develop international consensus around a set of general guidelines and purpose‐specific standard protocols...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Applied vegetation science Ročník 18; číslo 4; s. 543 - 560
Hlavní autoři: De Cáceres, Miquel, Chytrý, Milan, Agrillo, Emiliano, Attorre, Fabio, Botta‐Dukát, Zoltán, Capelo, Jorge, Czúcz, Bálint, Dengler, Jürgen, Ewald, Jörg, Faber‐Langendoen, Don, Feoli, Enrico, Franklin, Scott B, Gavilán, Rosario, Gillet, François, Jansen, Florian, Jiménez‐Alfaro, Borja, Krestov, Pavel, Landucci, Flavia, Lengyel, Attila, Loidi, Javier, Mucina, Ladislav, Peet, Robert K, Roberts, David W, Roleček, Jan, Schaminée, Joop H.J, Schmidtlein, Sebastian, Theurillat, Jean‐Paul, Tichý, Lubomír, Walker, Donald A, Wildi, Otto, Willner, Wolfgang, Wiser, Susan K, Scheiner, Sam
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: Malden Opulus Press 01.10.2015
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Wiley
Témata:
ISSN:1402-2001, 1654-109X
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:AIMS: Classification of vegetation is an essential tool to describe, understand, predict and manage biodiversity. Given the multiplicity of approaches to classify vegetation, it is important to develop international consensus around a set of general guidelines and purpose‐specific standard protocols. Before these goals can be achieved, however, it is necessary to identify and understand the different choices that are made during the process of classifying vegetation. This paper presents a framework to facilitate comparisons between broad‐scale plot‐based classification approaches. RESULTS: Our framework is based on the distinction of four structural elements (plot record, vegetation type, consistent classification section and classification system) and two procedural elements (classification protocol and classification approach). For each element we describe essential properties that can be used for comparisons. We also review alternative choices regarding critical decisions of classification approaches; with a special focus on the procedures used to define vegetation types from plot records. We illustrate our comparative framework by applying it to different broad‐scale classification approaches. CONCLUSIONS: Our framework will be useful for understanding and comparing plot‐based vegetation classification approaches, as well as for integrating classification systems and their sections.
Bibliografie:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/avsc.12179
REMEDINAL3-CM - No. S2013/MAE-2719
istex:468BE390D0BB7F364665F71DF3AF2A5756880ECF
Iluka Chair (University of Western Australia)
ArticleID:AVSC12179
Masaryk University
Bolyai grant of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences
Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness - No. RYC-2012-11109
Czech Science Foundation - No. P505/11/0732
ark:/67375/WNG-QJ3GJ5WS-Q
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1402-2001
1654-109X
DOI:10.1111/avsc.12179