comparative framework for broad‐scale plot‐based vegetation classification

AIMS: Classification of vegetation is an essential tool to describe, understand, predict and manage biodiversity. Given the multiplicity of approaches to classify vegetation, it is important to develop international consensus around a set of general guidelines and purpose‐specific standard protocols...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Applied vegetation science Ročník 18; číslo 4; s. 543 - 560
Hlavní autoři: De Cáceres, Miquel, Chytrý, Milan, Agrillo, Emiliano, Attorre, Fabio, Botta‐Dukát, Zoltán, Capelo, Jorge, Czúcz, Bálint, Dengler, Jürgen, Ewald, Jörg, Faber‐Langendoen, Don, Feoli, Enrico, Franklin, Scott B, Gavilán, Rosario, Gillet, François, Jansen, Florian, Jiménez‐Alfaro, Borja, Krestov, Pavel, Landucci, Flavia, Lengyel, Attila, Loidi, Javier, Mucina, Ladislav, Peet, Robert K, Roberts, David W, Roleček, Jan, Schaminée, Joop H.J, Schmidtlein, Sebastian, Theurillat, Jean‐Paul, Tichý, Lubomír, Walker, Donald A, Wildi, Otto, Willner, Wolfgang, Wiser, Susan K, Scheiner, Sam
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: Malden Opulus Press 01.10.2015
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Wiley
Témata:
ISSN:1402-2001, 1654-109X
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Abstract AIMS: Classification of vegetation is an essential tool to describe, understand, predict and manage biodiversity. Given the multiplicity of approaches to classify vegetation, it is important to develop international consensus around a set of general guidelines and purpose‐specific standard protocols. Before these goals can be achieved, however, it is necessary to identify and understand the different choices that are made during the process of classifying vegetation. This paper presents a framework to facilitate comparisons between broad‐scale plot‐based classification approaches. RESULTS: Our framework is based on the distinction of four structural elements (plot record, vegetation type, consistent classification section and classification system) and two procedural elements (classification protocol and classification approach). For each element we describe essential properties that can be used for comparisons. We also review alternative choices regarding critical decisions of classification approaches; with a special focus on the procedures used to define vegetation types from plot records. We illustrate our comparative framework by applying it to different broad‐scale classification approaches. CONCLUSIONS: Our framework will be useful for understanding and comparing plot‐based vegetation classification approaches, as well as for integrating classification systems and their sections.
AbstractList Aims: Classification of vegetation is an essential tool to describe, understand, predict and manage biodiversity. Given the multiplicity of approaches to classify vegetation, it is important to develop international consensus around a set of general guidelines and purpose-specific standard protocols. Before these goals can be achieved, however, it is necessary to identify and understand the different choices that are made during the process of classifying vegetation. This paper presents a framework to facilitate comparisons between broad-scale plot-based classification approaches.Results: Our framework is based on the distinction of four structural elements (plot record, vegetation type, consistent classification section and classification system) and two procedural elements (classification protocol and classification approach). For each element we describe essential properties that can be used for comparisons. We also review alternative choices regarding critical decisions of classification approaches; with a special focus on the procedures used to define vegetation types from plot records. We illustrate our comparative frame- work by applying it to different broad-scale classification approaches.Conclusions: Our framework will be useful for understanding and comparing plot-based vegetation classification approaches, as well as for integrating classification systems and their sections.
Aims:Classification of vegetation is an essential tool to describe, understand, predict and manage biodiversity. Given the multiplicity of approaches to classify vegetation, it is important to develop international consensus around a set of general guidelines and purpose-specific standard protocols. Before these goals can be achieved, however, it is necessary to identify and understand the different choices that are made during the process of classifying vegetation. This paper presents a framework to facilitate comparisons between broad-scale plot-based classification approaches.Results: Our framework is based on the distinction of four structural elements (plot record, vegetation type, consistent classification section and classification system) and two procedural elements (classification protocol and classification approach). For each element we describe essential properties that can be used for comparisons. We also review alternative choices regarding critical decisions of classification approaches; with a special focus on the procedures used to define vegetation types from plot records. We illustrate our comparative framework by applying it to different broad-scale classification approaches.Conclusions: Our framework will be useful for understanding and comparing plot-based vegetation classification approaches, as well as for integrating classification systems and their sections.
Aims Classification of vegetation is an essential tool to describe, understand, predict and manage biodiversity. Given the multiplicity of approaches to classify vegetation, it is important to develop international consensus around a set of general guidelines and purpose‐specific standard protocols. Before these goals can be achieved, however, it is necessary to identify and understand the different choices that are made during the process of classifying vegetation. This paper presents a framework to facilitate comparisons between broad‐scale plot‐based classification approaches. Results Our framework is based on the distinction of four structural elements (plot record, vegetation type, consistent classification section and classification system) and two procedural elements (classification protocol and classification approach). For each element we describe essential properties that can be used for comparisons. We also review alternative choices regarding critical decisions of classification approaches; with a special focus on the procedures used to define vegetation types from plot records. We illustrate our comparative framework by applying it to different broad‐scale classification approaches. Conclusions Our framework will be useful for understanding and comparing plot‐based vegetation classification approaches, as well as for integrating classification systems and their sections. We present a comparison framework for vegetation classification that distinguishes four structural elements (plot record, vegetation type, consistent classification section and classification system) and two procedural elements (classification protocol and classification approach). The framework will be useful for understanding and comparing plot‐based vegetation classification approaches, as well as for integrating classification systems and their sections.
Aims Classification of vegetation is an essential tool to describe, understand, predict and manage biodiversity. Given the multiplicity of approaches to classify vegetation, it is important to develop international consensus around a set of general guidelines and purpose-specific standard protocols. Before these goals can be achieved, however, it is necessary to identify and understand the different choices that are made during the process of classifying vegetation. This paper presents a framework to facilitate comparisons between broad-scale plot-based classification approaches. Results Our framework is based on the distinction of four structural elements (plot record, vegetation type, consistent classification section and classification system) and two procedural elements (classification protocol and classification approach). For each element we describe essential properties that can be used for comparisons. We also review alternative choices regarding critical decisions of classification approaches; with a special focus on the procedures used to define vegetation types from plot records. We illustrate our comparative framework by applying it to different broad-scale classification approaches. Conclusions Our framework will be useful for understanding and comparing plot-based vegetation classification approaches, as well as for integrating classification systems and their sections. We present a comparison framework for vegetation classification that distinguishes four structural elements (plot record, vegetation type, consistent classification section and classification system) and two procedural elements (classification protocol and classification approach). The framework will be useful for understanding and comparing plot-based vegetation classification approaches, as well as for integrating classification systems and their sections.
Author Jansen, Florian
Roleček, Jan
Jiménez-Alfaro, Borja
Peet, Robert K.
Roberts, David W.
Dengler, Jürgen
Feoli, Enrico
Schaminée, Joop H.J.
Krestov, Pavel
Gillet, François
Agrillo, Emiliano
Loidi, Javier
Lengyel, Attila
Wiser, Susan K.
Gavilán, Rosario
Willner, Wolfgang
Chytrý, Milan
Franklin, Scott B.
Theurillat, Jean-Paul
Wildi, Otto
Czúcz, Bálint
Landucci, Flavia
Attorre, Fabio
Botta-Dukát, Zoltán
Tichý, Lubomír
De Cáceres, Miquel
Capelo, Jorge
Mucina, Ladislav
Walker, Donald A.
Ewald, Jörg
Faber-Langendoen, Don
Schmidtlein, Sebastian
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  fullname: De Cáceres, Miquel
– sequence: 2
  fullname: Chytrý, Milan
– sequence: 3
  fullname: Agrillo, Emiliano
– sequence: 4
  fullname: Attorre, Fabio
– sequence: 5
  fullname: Botta‐Dukát, Zoltán
– sequence: 6
  fullname: Capelo, Jorge
– sequence: 7
  fullname: Czúcz, Bálint
– sequence: 8
  fullname: Dengler, Jürgen
– sequence: 9
  fullname: Ewald, Jörg
– sequence: 10
  fullname: Faber‐Langendoen, Don
– sequence: 11
  fullname: Feoli, Enrico
– sequence: 12
  fullname: Franklin, Scott B
– sequence: 13
  fullname: Gavilán, Rosario
– sequence: 14
  fullname: Gillet, François
– sequence: 15
  fullname: Jansen, Florian
– sequence: 16
  fullname: Jiménez‐Alfaro, Borja
– sequence: 17
  fullname: Krestov, Pavel
– sequence: 18
  fullname: Landucci, Flavia
– sequence: 19
  fullname: Lengyel, Attila
– sequence: 20
  fullname: Loidi, Javier
– sequence: 21
  fullname: Mucina, Ladislav
– sequence: 22
  fullname: Peet, Robert K
– sequence: 23
  fullname: Roberts, David W
– sequence: 24
  fullname: Roleček, Jan
– sequence: 25
  fullname: Schaminée, Joop H.J
– sequence: 26
  fullname: Schmidtlein, Sebastian
– sequence: 27
  fullname: Theurillat, Jean‐Paul
– sequence: 28
  fullname: Tichý, Lubomír
– sequence: 29
  fullname: Walker, Donald A
– sequence: 30
  fullname: Wildi, Otto
– sequence: 31
  fullname: Willner, Wolfgang
– sequence: 32
  fullname: Wiser, Susan K
– sequence: 33
  fullname: Scheiner, Sam
BackLink https://hal.science/hal-01211250$$DView record in HAL
BookMark eNqFkstuEzEUQEeoSLSFDXvESGwAaYrfjruLIkipoqIqlLKz7ng8welkHOxJQnd8At_Il-DptF1UCLzw655j2ff6INtrfWuz7DlGRzi1d7CN5ggTLNWjbB8LzgqM1Ne9NGeIFAQh_CQ7iHGZJlJxtZ-dGb9aQ4DObW1eB1jZnQ9Xee1DXgYP1e-fv6KBxubrxndpUUK0Vb61C9slx7e5aSBGVztzs3yaPa6hifbZ7XiYXXx4_3lyUsw-TT9OxrPCSDRSBWdcjizgGlWEgKhkyWojsWSKUWIVx5XklcAwKhli3IiKksoIUdWSipoaSg-z4-HcHSxs69rU6RaCcVF7cLpxZYBwrXeboNumH9abMmqmOCIoyW8G-Rs0eh3cqkd77WQ80_0eShnEhKMtTuzrgV0H_31jY6dXLhrbNNBav4kajxBNL6KU_R-VhCRcjPobvHqALv0mtCljicJIYMQISRQaKBN8jMHW2rgh610A12iMdF903Rdd3xQ9KW8fKHfv-yuMb5PoGnv9D1KPv8wnd86LwVnGzod7h1GVfpviKV4McRc7--M-DuFKC0kl15dnU31-Sqen_HKuzxP_cuBr8BoWIRXwYk4QFgghhaTC9A9CnuLd
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apsoil_2017_10_024
crossref_primary_10_1111_avsc_12779
crossref_primary_10_3390_d17010040
crossref_primary_10_1111_avsc_12257
crossref_primary_10_1111_avsc_12258
crossref_primary_10_1111_avsc_12379
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2021_119041
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envsoft_2023_105859
crossref_primary_10_1080_11263504_2023_2165562
crossref_primary_10_3390_rs12071132
crossref_primary_10_1080_11263504_2020_1801877
crossref_primary_10_1111_jvs_12984
crossref_primary_10_1111_avsc_12265
crossref_primary_10_1111_avsc_12386
crossref_primary_10_1002_ece3_9496
crossref_primary_10_1111_avsc_12646
crossref_primary_10_3390_rs16081371
crossref_primary_10_1111_avsc_12802
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10531_016_1086_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_sajb_2024_08_021
crossref_primary_10_1111_ddi_12736
crossref_primary_10_1111_jvs_13042
crossref_primary_10_1080_11263504_2017_1302514
crossref_primary_10_4102_abc_v49i1_2452
crossref_primary_10_1177_09596836231169986
crossref_primary_10_3390_rs14153714
crossref_primary_10_1111_avsc_12491
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12224_018_9318_3
crossref_primary_10_1111_avsc_12712
crossref_primary_10_1111_avsc_12314
crossref_primary_10_3897_VCS_72194
crossref_primary_10_3897_VCS_72875
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11756_024_01661_1
crossref_primary_10_3897_pls2023601_04
crossref_primary_10_1111_jvs_12400
crossref_primary_10_1111_jvs_12886
crossref_primary_10_1111_jvs_12885
crossref_primary_10_3897_VCS_120442
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10531_020_02044_z
crossref_primary_10_3897_VCS_100796
crossref_primary_10_1111_avsc_12442
crossref_primary_10_1007_s13595_019_0824_0
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00572_022_01072_7
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fecs_2024_100283
crossref_primary_10_1080_15230406_2021_1942218
crossref_primary_10_1002_ece3_10757
crossref_primary_10_1002_ece3_11569
crossref_primary_10_1111_avsc_12544
crossref_primary_10_1111_avsc_12396
crossref_primary_10_1111_avsc_12271
crossref_primary_10_3897_VCS_122617
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11258_018_0870_y
crossref_primary_10_1111_avsc_12219
crossref_primary_10_3390_su11215887
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolind_2019_105584
crossref_primary_10_1080_07038992_2019_1682980
crossref_primary_10_1002_ece3_9681
crossref_primary_10_1111_avsc_12611
crossref_primary_10_1080_22797254_2020_1795727
crossref_primary_10_1111_avsc_12461
crossref_primary_10_3390_rs17101778
crossref_primary_10_1111_avsc_12565
crossref_primary_10_1111_avsc_12201
crossref_primary_10_1002_ece3_5774
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10531_022_02427_4
crossref_primary_10_1111_jvs_13086
crossref_primary_10_3897_VCS_87068
crossref_primary_10_1111_jvs_12799
crossref_primary_10_1111_avsc_12695
crossref_primary_10_1556_168_2018_19_2_11
crossref_primary_10_3897_VCS_151773
crossref_primary_10_1111_avsc_12510
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12210_018_0703_x
crossref_primary_10_1111_aec_13460
crossref_primary_10_1088_1748_9326_11_5_055005
crossref_primary_10_3389_fenvs_2023_1134108
crossref_primary_10_3897_VCS_148065
crossref_primary_10_1111_avsc_12519
crossref_primary_10_5209_mbot_66535
crossref_primary_10_1111_avsc_12484
crossref_primary_10_1111_jvs_12604
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2024_121697
crossref_primary_10_1111_avsc_70032
crossref_primary_10_1177_0309133321999371
crossref_primary_10_3897_VCS_134621
crossref_primary_10_1080_17445647_2022_2120835
crossref_primary_10_1111_avsc_12589
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rse_2019_01_018
crossref_primary_10_1111_jvs_70012
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10531_020_01963_1
crossref_primary_10_3897_pls2023602_05
crossref_primary_10_1111_jvs_12696
crossref_primary_10_1111_jvs_12850
crossref_primary_10_1002_ece3_2967
crossref_primary_10_4102_koedoe_v62i1_1604
crossref_primary_10_1111_2041_210X_13301
crossref_primary_10_1111_avsc_12231
crossref_primary_10_3897_VCS_83045
crossref_primary_10_1111_avsc_12595
crossref_primary_10_3897_VCS_119253
Cites_doi 10.2307/3236265
10.1007/978-94-009-9183-5
10.1016/B978-008045405-4.00533-4
10.2307/3235862
10.1111/j.2041-210X.2012.00246.x
10.2307/3235591
10.1007/BF02803883
10.1007/978-94-009-9183-5_1
10.1111/jvs.12277
10.1111/j.1654-1103.2005.tb02388.x
10.1111/ele.12141
10.1111/j.1654-1103.2006.tb02467.x
10.1017/9780521235587
10.14430/arctic4281
10.1007/BF00045509
10.1111/j.1654-1103.2012.01416.x
10.1111/j.1654-1103.2010.01225.x
10.1111/j.1600-0587.2010.06599.x
10.1890/07-1804.1
10.1007/BF02893880
10.1002/9781118452592.ch2
10.1111/avsc.12025
10.1111/j.1654-1103.2009.01143.x
10.3170/2008-8-18406
10.2307/3237019
10.1111/avsc.12017
10.1111/j.1654-1103.2012.01450.x
10.1111/j.1654-1103.2010.01211.x
10.2307/2259682
10.1111/j.1654-109X.2011.01173.x
10.1111/avsc.12041
10.1111/j.1654-1103.2003.tb02183.x
10.1007/BF00031691
10.1111/j.1654-1103.2010.01221.x
10.1007/3-540-33161-1
10.1017/S0376892906002967
10.1007/978-94-009-9183-5_6
10.1007/978-94-010-2701-4_20
10.1002/9780470977811
10.1111/jvs.12193
10.1111/j.1654-1103.2011.01265.x
10.1111/avsc.12093
10.5962/bhl.title.30020
10.2307/3236411
10.1556/ABot.50.2008.1-2.4
10.1023/A:1009760808505
10.1023/A:1009763730207
10.1007/s11258-014-0403-2
10.1111/jvs.12145
10.1016/B978-0-444-53868-0.50018-6
10.1111/j.1654-1103.2003.tb02187.x
10.1023/A:1026280428467
10.2307/2257132
10.2307/1930415
10.1111/jvs.12268
10.1111/j.1654-1103.2011.01354.x
10.1007/BF00031729
10.1111/j.1654-1103.2010.01204.x
10.1111/j.1654-1103.2009.01062.x
10.2307/3236425
10.1002/9781118562543
10.1127/0340-269X/2006/0036-0067
10.1002/sam.10080
10.1007/BF00042259
10.1890/13-2334.1
10.1002/9781118452592.ch12
10.1007/BF00031692
10.1007/BF02893886
10.1007/BF00038687
10.1111/j.1654-1103.2009.01073.x
10.2307/3236147
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright © 2015 International Association for Vegetation Science
2015 International Association for Vegetation Science
Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Wageningen University & Research
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright © 2015 International Association for Vegetation Science
– notice: 2015 International Association for Vegetation Science
– notice: Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
– notice: Wageningen University & Research
DBID FBQ
BSCLL
AAYXX
CITATION
7SN
C1K
7ST
7U6
7S9
L.6
1XC
VOOES
QVL
DOI 10.1111/avsc.12179
DatabaseName AGRIS
Istex
CrossRef
Ecology Abstracts
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
Environment Abstracts
Sustainability Science Abstracts
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)
Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)
NARCIS:Publications
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
Ecology Abstracts
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
Environment Abstracts
Sustainability Science Abstracts
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
DatabaseTitleList

Ecology Abstracts

Ecology Abstracts

AGRICOLA

DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Botany
Environmental Sciences
EISSN 1654-109X
Editor Scheiner, Sam
Editor_xml – sequence: 33
  givenname: Sam
  surname: Scheiner
  fullname: Scheiner, Sam
EndPage 560
ExternalDocumentID oai_library_wur_nl_wurpubs_495020
oai:HAL:hal-01211250v1
3801954431
10_1111_avsc_12179
AVSC12179
43916595
ark_67375_WNG_QJ3GJ5WS_Q
US201600090791
Genre article
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: Masaryk University
– fundername: Czech Science Foundation
  funderid: P505/11/0732
– fundername: REMEDINAL3‐CM
  funderid: S2013/MAE‐2719
– fundername: Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness
  funderid: RYC‐2012‐11109
– fundername: Bolyai grant of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences
– fundername: Iluka Chair (University of Western Australia)
GroupedDBID -JH
.3N
.GA
.Y3
05W
0R~
10A
1L6
1OC
23M
2~F
31~
33P
3SF
4.4
4P2
50Y
50Z
51W
51X
52M
52N
52O
52P
52S
52T
52U
52W
52X
5GY
5HH
5LA
5VS
66C
702
7PT
8-0
8-1
8-3
8-4
8-5
8UM
930
A03
AAESR
AAEVG
AAHBH
AAHHS
AAHKG
AAHQN
AAMNL
AANHP
AANLZ
AAONW
AAPSS
AASGY
AAXRX
AAXTN
AAYCA
AAZKR
ABBHK
ABCQN
ABCUV
ABDBF
ABEML
ABJNI
ABPLY
ABPVW
ABTLG
ABXSQ
ACAHQ
ACBWZ
ACCFJ
ACCZN
ACGFS
ACHIC
ACPOU
ACPRK
ACRPL
ACSCC
ACUHS
ACXBN
ACXQS
ACYXJ
ADBBV
ADEOM
ADHSS
ADIZJ
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADNMO
ADOZA
ADULT
ADXAS
ADZMN
ADZOD
AEEJZ
AEEZP
AEIGN
AEIMD
AENEX
AEPYG
AEQDE
AEUPB
AEUYR
AFAZZ
AFBPY
AFFIJ
AFFPM
AFGKR
AFNWH
AFRAH
AFWVQ
AGHNM
AGUYK
AHBTC
AHXOZ
AICQM
AITYG
AIURR
AIWBW
AJBDE
AJXKR
AKPMI
ALAGY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
ALVPJ
AMBMR
AMYDB
ANHSF
AQVQM
ASPBG
ATUGU
AUFTA
AVWKF
AZBYB
AZFZN
AZVAB
BAFTC
BDRZF
BFHJK
BHBCM
BMNLL
BMXJE
BNHUX
BROTX
BRXPI
BY8
C45
CAG
CBGCD
COF
CS3
D-E
D-F
DATOO
DC7
DCZOG
DPXWK
DR2
DRFUL
DRSTM
EAD
EAP
EBD
EBS
ECGQY
EDH
EJD
EMK
ESX
F00
F01
F04
FBQ
FEDTE
G-S
G.N
GODZA
GTFYD
H.T
H.X
H13
HF~
HGD
HGLYW
HTVGU
HVGLF
HZ~
IAG
IAO
IEP
IGH
IHR
IPSME
ITC
IX1
J.8
J0M
JAAYA
JBMMH
JBS
JENOY
JHFFW
JKQEH
JLS
JLXEF
JPM
JST
KPI
LATKE
LC2
LC3
LEEKS
LH4
LITHE
LOXES
LP6
LP7
LUTES
LW6
LYRES
MEWTI
MK4
MRFUL
MRSTM
MSFUL
MSSTM
MXFUL
MXSTM
N04
N05
N9A
NF~
O66
O9-
OIG
OVD
P2P
P2W
P2X
P4D
PQ0
Q.N
Q11
Q5J
QB0
R.K
RBO
ROL
RX1
SA0
SUPJJ
TEORI
TUS
UB1
W8V
W99
WBKPD
WIH
WIK
WOHZO
WQJ
WUPDE
WXSBR
WYISQ
XG1
XV2
Y6R
ZZTAW
~8M
~IA
~KM
~WT
AAMMB
AEFGJ
AEYWJ
AGQPQ
AGXDD
AGYGG
AIDQK
AIDYY
BSCLL
AAYXX
BANNL
CITATION
O8X
7SN
C1K
7ST
7U6
7S9
L.6
1XC
VOOES
0R
31
3N
53G
AACFU
AAPBV
ABHUG
ABPTK
ACXME
ADAWD
ADDAD
ADOYD
ADZLD
AEDJY
AESBF
AEUQT
AFPWT
AGJLS
AIFVT
AIRJO
CWIXF
DFEDG
DOOOF
DWIUU
EQZMY
GA
HZ
IA
JH
JSODD
KM
NF
P4A
QVL
RIG
RWI
UNR
WRC
WT
Y3
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c7089-54578ea1f0d22a6d7b4fc71749432e951d75d61a8b4045c6d32dc66df736f3c33
IEDL.DBID DRFUL
ISICitedReferencesCount 148
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000361181500002&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 1402-2001
IngestDate Fri Feb 05 18:08:14 EST 2021
Tue Oct 14 20:21:32 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 18:33:56 EDT 2025
Tue Oct 07 09:42:52 EDT 2025
Sun Jul 13 04:37:27 EDT 2025
Sat Nov 29 03:38:08 EST 2025
Tue Nov 18 22:34:27 EST 2025
Wed Aug 20 07:24:52 EDT 2025
Thu Jul 03 22:32:05 EDT 2025
Sun Sep 21 06:18:53 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 03 09:46:35 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 4
Keywords Vegetation continuum
Classification system
Vegetation-plot database
Vegetation type
Braun-Blanquet approach
Consistent classification section
Phytosociology
Assignment rule
EcoVeg approach
Language English
License http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c7089-54578ea1f0d22a6d7b4fc71749432e951d75d61a8b4045c6d32dc66df736f3c33
Notes http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/avsc.12179
REMEDINAL3-CM - No. S2013/MAE-2719
istex:468BE390D0BB7F364665F71DF3AF2A5756880ECF
Iluka Chair (University of Western Australia)
ArticleID:AVSC12179
Masaryk University
Bolyai grant of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences
Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness - No. RYC-2012-11109
Czech Science Foundation - No. P505/11/0732
ark:/67375/WNG-QJ3GJ5WS-Q
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0003-3221-660X
0000-0002-5047-9000
0000-0002-0331-5185
0000-0002-1712-6748
0000-0003-1591-8386
0000-0002-5898-9777
0000-0001-6601-9597
0000-0002-6462-7633
0000-0002-7744-2195
0000-0002-2758-9324
0000-0001-7132-2080
0000-0002-3334-1069
0000-0003-0317-8886
0000-0002-8122-3075
0000-0002-9544-3474
0000-0002-1022-445X
0000-0003-2346-8346
OpenAccessLink https://hal.science/hal-01211250
PQID 1710610422
PQPubID 946338
PageCount 18
ParticipantIDs wageningen_narcis_oai_library_wur_nl_wurpubs_495020
hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01211250v1
proquest_miscellaneous_1803089334
proquest_miscellaneous_1722180680
proquest_journals_1710610422
crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_avsc_12179
crossref_primary_10_1111_avsc_12179
wiley_primary_10_1111_avsc_12179_AVSC12179
jstor_primary_43916595
istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_QJ3GJ5WS_Q
fao_agris_US201600090791
ProviderPackageCode QVL
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate October 2015
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2015-10-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 10
  year: 2015
  text: October 2015
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Malden
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Malden
PublicationTitle Applied vegetation science
PublicationTitleAlternate Appl Veg Sci
PublicationYear 2015
Publisher Opulus Press
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Wiley
Publisher_xml – name: Opulus Press
– name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd
– name: John Wiley & Sons Ltd
– name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
– name: Wiley
References Lengyel, A. & Podani, J. 2015. Assessing the relative importance of methodological decisions in classifications of vegetation data. Journal of Vegetation Science. 26: 804-815.
Barkman, J.J. 1989. A critical evaluation of minimum area concepts. Vegetatio 85: 89-104.
Vendramin, L., Campello, R.J.G.B. & Hruschka, E.R. 2010. Relative clustering validity criteria: a comparative overview. Statistical Analysis and Data Mining 3: 209-235.
Whittaker, R.H. (ed.) 1978c. Classification of plant communities. Dr W. Junk, The Hague, NL.
Jiménez-Alfaro, B., Chytrý, M., Rejmánek, M. & Mucina, L. 2014. The number of vegetation types in European countries: major determinants and extrapolation to other regions. Journal of Vegetation Science 25: 863-872.
UNESCO. 1973. International classification and mapping of vegetation, pp. 1-93. UNESCO Ecology and Conservation Series 6. UNESCO, Paris, FR.
Wildi, O. 2013. Data analysis in vegetation ecology, 2nd ed. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, UK.
Berg, C., Abdank, A., Isermann, M., Jansen, F., Timmermann, T. & Dengler, J. 2014. Red Lists and conservation prioritization of plant communities - a methodological framework. Applied Vegetation Science 17: 403-515.
De Gruijter, J.J., Bierkens, M.F.P., Brus, D.J. & Knotters, M. 2006. Sampling for natural resource monitoring. Springer, Berlin, DE.
Neldner, V.J., Wilson, B.A., Thompson, E.J. & Dillewaard, H.A. 2012. Methodology for survey and mapping of regional ecosystems and vegetation communities in Queensland. Version 3.2. Updated August 2012. Queensland Herbarium, Queensland Department of Science, Information Technology, Innovation and the Arts, Brisbane, AU.
Schmidtlein, S., Tichý, L., Feilhauer, H. & Faude, U. 2010. A brute-force approach to vegetation classification. Journal of Vegetation Science 21: 1162-1171.
De Cáceres, M., Font, X. & Oliva, F. 2010. The management of vegetation classifications with fuzzy clustering. Journal of Vegetation Science 21: 1138-1151.
Eliáš, P. Jr., Sopotlieva, D., Díté, D., Hájková, P., Apostolova, I., Senko, D., Melečková, Z. & Hájek, M. 2013. Vegetation diversity of salt-rich grasslands in Southeast Europe. Applied Vegetation Science 16: 521-537.
Podani, J. 1994. Multivariate data analysis in ecology and systematics: a methodological guide to the SYN-TAX 5.0 package. SPB Academic, The Hague, NL.
De Cáceres, M. & Wiser, S.K. 2012. Towards consistency in vegetation classification. Journal of Vegetation Science 23: 387-393.
Carranza, L., Feoli, E. & Ganis, P. 1998. Analysis of vegetation structural diversity by Burnaby's similarity index. Plant Ecology 138: 77-87.
Lengyel, A., Chytrý, M. & Tichý, L. 2011. Heterogeneity-constrained random resampling of phytosociological databases. Journal of Vegetation Science 22: 175-183.
Rodwell, J.S. (ed.) 1991-2000. British plant communities. Vol. 1-5. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Berg, C., Dengler, J., Abdank, A. & Isermann, M. (eds.) 2004. Die Pflanzengesellschaften Mecklenburg-Vorpommerns und ihre Gefährdung - Textband. Weissdorn, Jena, DE.
Carleton, T., Stitt, R. & Nieppola, J. 1996. Constrained indicator species analysis (COINSPAN): an extension of TWINSPAN. Journal of Vegetation Science 7: 125-130.
Landucci, F., Tichý, L., Šumberová, K. & Chytrý, M. 2015. Formalized classification of species-poor vegetation: a proposal of a consistent protocol for aquatic vegetation. Journal of Vegetation Science. 26: 791-803.
Willner, W. & Grabherr, G. 2007. Die Wälder und Gebüsche Österreichs - Ein Bestimmungswerk mit Tabellen. 2 vols. Spektrum Akademischer, Heidelberg, DE.
Vymazalová, M., Axmanová, I. & Tichý, L. 2012. Effect of intra-seasonal variability on vegetation data. Journal of Vegetation Science 23: 978-984.
Loidi, J., Biurrun, I., Campos, J.A., Garcia-Mijangos, I. & Herrera, M. 2010. A biogeographical analysis of the European Atlantic lowland heathlands. Journal of Vegetation Science 21: 832-842.
Fosberg, F.R. 1961. A classification of vegetation for general purposes. Tropical Ecology 2: 1-28.
Schaminée, J.H.J., Stortelder, A.H.F. & Weesthoff, V. (eds.) 1995. De vegetatie von Nederland - Deel 1. Inleiding tot de plantensociologie - grondslagen, methoden en toepassingen. Opulus, Uppsala, SE.
Chytrý, M. & Otýpková, Z. 2003. Plot sizes used for phytosociological sampling of European vegetation. Journal of Vegetation Science 14: 563-570.
Tichý, L., Chytrý, M., Hájek, M., Talbot, S.S. & Botta-Dukát, Z. 2010. OptimClass: using species-to-cluster fidelity to determine the optimal partition in classification of ecological communities. Journal of Vegetation Science 21: 287-299.
Hakes, W. 1994. On the predictive power of numerical and Braun-Blanquet classification: an example from beechwoods. Journal of Vegetation Science 5: 153-160.
Mueller-Dombois, D. & Ellenberg, H. 1974. Aims and methods of vegetation ecology. J. Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, US.
Legendre, P. & Legendre, L. 2012. Numerical ecology, 3rd ed. Elsevier, Amsterdam, NL.
Pignatti, S., Oberdorfer, E., Schaminée, J.H.J. & Westhoff, V. 1995. On the concept of vegetation class in phytosociology. Journal of Vegetation Science 6: 143-152.
Roleček, J., Tichý, L., Zelený, D. & Chytrý, M. 2009. Modified TWINSPAN classification in which the hierarchy respects cluster heterogeneity. Journal of Vegetation Science 20: 596-602.
Roleček, J., Chytrý, M., Hájek, M., Lvončík, S. & Tichý, L. 2007. Sampling design in large-scale vegetation studies: do not sacrifice ecological thinking to statistical purism! Folia Geobotanica 42: 199-208.
Mucina, L. & van der Maarel, E. 1989. Twenty years of numerical syntaxonomy. Vegetatio 81: 1-15.
Botta-Dukát, Z. 2008. Validation of hierarchical classifications by splitting dataset. Acta Botanica Hungarica 50: 73-80.
Mucina, L. 1997. Classification of vegetation: past, present and future. Journal of Vegetation Science 8: 751-760.
Reed, R.A., Peet, R.K., Palmer, M.W. & White, P.S. 1993. Scale dependence of vegetation-environment correlations: a case study of a North Carolina piedmont woodland. Journal of Vegetation Science 4: 329-340.
Gillet, F. & Gallandat, J.-D. 1996. Integrated synusial phytosociology: some notes on a new, multiscalar approach to vegetation analysis. Journal of Vegetation Science 7: 13-18.
De Cáceres, M., Legendre, P., Wiser, S.K. & Brotons, L. 2012. Using species combinations in indicator value analyses. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 3: 973-982.
Tichý, L., Chytrý, M. & Šmarda, P. 2011. Evaluating the stability of the classification of community data. Ecography 34: 807-813.
Faith, D.P., Minchin, P.R. & Belbin, L. 1987. Compositional dissimilarity as a robust measure of ecological distance. Vegetatio 69: 57-68.
Sukachev, V.N. 1928. Vegetation communities: introduction to phytosociology. Kniga, Leningrad, RU. [In Russian].
Orlóci, L. 1978. Multivariate analysis in vegetation research. Dr. W. Junk, The Hague, NL.
Gillet, F., de Foucault, B. & Julve, P. 1991. La phytosociologie synusiale intégrée: objets et concepts. Candollea 46: 315-340.
Beard, J.S. & Webb, M.J. 1972. The vegetation survey of Western Australia, its aims, objects and methods. Part I of explanatory notes to Sheet 2: Great Sandy Desert. Vegetation Survey of Western Australia: 1:1,000,000 Vegetation Series. University of Western Australia Press, Perth, AU.
Feoli, E. 1984. Some aspects of classification and ordination of vegetation data in perspective. Studia Geobotanica 4: 7-21.
Faber-Langendoen, D., Keeler-Wolf, T., Meidinger, D., Tart, D., Hoagland, B., Josse, C., Navarro, G., Ponomarenko, S., Saucier, J.-P., Weakley, A. & Comer, P. 2014. EcoVeg: a new approach to vegetation description and classification. Ecological Monographs 84: 533-561.
Hill, M.O. 1979. TWINSPAN - a FORTRAN program for arranging multivariate data in an ordered two-way table by classification of the individuals and attributes. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, US.
Hill, M.O. 1989. Computerized matching of relevés and association tables, with an application to the British National Vegetation Classification. Vegetatio 83: 187-194.
Peet, R.K., Wentworth, T.R. & White, P.S. 1998. A flexible, multipurpose method for recording vegetation composition and structure. Castanea 63: 262-274.
Willner, W. 2006. The association concept revisited. Phytocoenologia 36: 67-76.
Dengler, J., Löbel, S. & Dolnik, C. 2009. Species constancy depends on plot size - a problem for vegetation classification and how it can be solved. Journal of Vegetation Science 20: 754-766.
Dengler, J., Bergmeier, E., Willner, W. & Chytrý, M. 2013. Towards a consistent classification of European grasslands. Applied Vegetation Science 16: 518-520.
Kent, M. 2012. Vegetation description and data analysis: a practical approach, 2nd ed. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, UK.
von Humboldt, A. 1807. Ideen zu einer Geographie der Pflanzen nebst einem Naturgemälde der Tropenländer. Cotta, Tübingen, DE.
Willner, W. 2011. Unambiguous assignment of relevés to vegetation units: the example of the Festuco-Brometea and Trifolio-Geranietea sanguinei. Tuexenia 31: 271-282.
De Candolle, A.P. 1855. Géographie botanique raisonnée ou exposition des faits principaux et des lois concernant la distribution géographique des plantes de l'époque actuelle. Masson, Paris, FR.
Zechmeister, H.G. & Mucina, L. 1994. Vegetation of European springs: high-rank syntaxa of the Montio-Cardaminetea. Journal of Vegetation Science 5: 385-402.
Luther-Mosebach, J., Dengler, J., Schmiedel, U., Röwer, I.U., Labitzky, T. & Gröngröft, A. 2012. A first formal classification of the Hardeveld vegetation in Namaqualand, South Africa. Applied Vegetation Science 15: 401-431.
Li, C.-F., Chytrý, M., Zelený, D., Chen, M.-Y., Chen, T.-Y., Chiou, C.-R., Hsia, Y.-J., Liu, H.-Y., Yang, S.-Z., (...) & Hsieh, C.-F. 2013. Classification of Taiwan forest vegetation. Applied Vegetation Science 16: 698-719.
Cooper, A., McCann, T. & Bunce, R.G.H. 2006. The influence of sampling intensity on vegetation classification and the implications for environmental management. Environmental Conservation 33: 118-127.
Legendre, P. &
1989; 85
1989; 83
2013; 66
1930; 11
2013; 24
2006; 33
1989; 81
2006; 36
1855
2003; 14
2014; 25
1974
1973
1972
2008; 4
2012; 15
1979
1993; 4
1978
1997; 8
1955; 43
1990; 86
2010; 21
2013; 16
1990
1991; 46
1961; 2
2011; 22
1951; 32
1978b
1978a
1980
2014; 17
2015; 216
1978c
2010; 3
2003; 169
2012; 23
1996; 7
1989; 4
2009; 20
2012
2011
2008; 19
2006; 17
1981; 69
1998
2011; 31
2008
2007
2006
1995
1994
2004
2011; 34
1999; 144
2003
1998; 138
1991
2008; 50
1998; 63
2014; 84
1838; 12
1995; 6
1987; 69
2015; 26
1993; 13
1988; 3
2009; 79
2012; 3
1984; 4
1997; 32
1964
2013
2007; 42
2005; 16
1928
1807
1994; 5
e_1_2_10_21_1
e_1_2_10_44_1
Trass H. (e_1_2_10_89_1) 1978
Grisebach A. (e_1_2_10_46_1) 1838; 12
e_1_2_10_2_1
e_1_2_10_74_1
e_1_2_10_97_1
e_1_2_10_6_1
e_1_2_10_55_1
e_1_2_10_14_1
e_1_2_10_37_1
e_1_2_10_78_1
e_1_2_10_13_1
e_1_2_10_32_1
e_1_2_10_51_1
UNESCO (e_1_2_10_90_1) 1973
Willner W. (e_1_2_10_104_1) 2007
e_1_2_10_29_1
e_1_2_10_63_1
e_1_2_10_86_1
e_1_2_10_105_1
e_1_2_10_25_1
e_1_2_10_67_1
e_1_2_10_101_1
e_1_2_10_45_1
e_1_2_10_22_1
Neldner V.J. (e_1_2_10_69_1) 2012
e_1_2_10_41_1
Barkman J.J. (e_1_2_10_4_1) 1980
Sukachev V.N. (e_1_2_10_85_1) 1928
Orlóci L. (e_1_2_10_70_1) 1978
Beard J.S. (e_1_2_10_7_1) 1972
e_1_2_10_71_1
Schaminée J.H.J. (e_1_2_10_82_1) 1995
Peet R.K. (e_1_2_10_73_1) 1998; 63
e_1_2_10_94_1
e_1_2_10_52_1
e_1_2_10_3_1
e_1_2_10_38_1
e_1_2_10_98_1
e_1_2_10_56_1
e_1_2_10_79_1
e_1_2_10_15_1
De Candolle A.P. (e_1_2_10_24_1) 1855
e_1_2_10_10_1
e_1_2_10_33_1
Kent M. (e_1_2_10_54_1) 2012
e_1_2_10_60_1
Gillet F. (e_1_2_10_43_1) 1991; 46
e_1_2_10_106_1
e_1_2_10_83_1
e_1_2_10_64_1
e_1_2_10_102_1
e_1_2_10_49_1
e_1_2_10_87_1
e_1_2_10_26_1
e_1_2_10_23_1
European Commission (e_1_2_10_35_1) 2013
e_1_2_10_42_1
Walker J. (e_1_2_10_95_1) 1990
Möller H. (e_1_2_10_65_1) 1993; 13
Cooper A. (e_1_2_10_18_1) 2006; 33
e_1_2_10_91_1
Hill M.O. (e_1_2_10_48_1) 1979
e_1_2_10_72_1
Braun‐Blanquet J. (e_1_2_10_12_1) 1964
e_1_2_10_53_1
e_1_2_10_76_1
e_1_2_10_99_1
ESCAVI (e_1_2_10_34_1) 2003
e_1_2_10_57_1
e_1_2_10_58_1
Shaukat S.S. (e_1_2_10_84_1) 1989; 4
e_1_2_10_11_1
e_1_2_10_30_1
Dierschke H. (e_1_2_10_31_1) 1994
Berg C. (e_1_2_10_8_1) 2004
e_1_2_10_80_1
e_1_2_10_61_1
Willner W. (e_1_2_10_103_1) 2011; 31
e_1_2_10_27_1
e_1_2_10_88_1
Dale M. (e_1_2_10_19_1) 1988; 3
e_1_2_10_20_1
Feoli E. (e_1_2_10_39_1) 1984; 4
Podani J. (e_1_2_10_75_1) 1994
Fosberg F.R. (e_1_2_10_40_1) 1961; 2
e_1_2_10_92_1
Chytrý M. (e_1_2_10_16_1) 2007
e_1_2_10_96_1
e_1_2_10_5_1
e_1_2_10_17_1
e_1_2_10_77_1
e_1_2_10_36_1
e_1_2_10_9_1
e_1_2_10_59_1
e_1_2_10_50_1
Humboldt A. (e_1_2_10_93_1) 1807
Mueller‐Dombois D. (e_1_2_10_68_1) 1974
e_1_2_10_81_1
e_1_2_10_62_1
e_1_2_10_28_1
e_1_2_10_66_1
e_1_2_10_100_1
e_1_2_10_47_1
References_xml – reference: Whittaker, R.H. (ed.) 1978c. Classification of plant communities. Dr W. Junk, The Hague, NL.
– reference: Möller, H. 1993. "Pflanzengesellschaft" als Typus und als Gesamtheit von Vegetationsausschnitten. Versuch einer begrifflichen Klärung. Tuexenia 13: 11-21.
– reference: De Cáceres, M. & Wiser, S.K. 2012. Towards consistency in vegetation classification. Journal of Vegetation Science 23: 387-393.
– reference: Dierschke, H. 1994. Pflanzensoziologie - Grundlagen und Methoden. E. Ulmer, Stuttgart, DE.
– reference: Reed, R.A., Peet, R.K., Palmer, M.W. & White, P.S. 1993. Scale dependence of vegetation-environment correlations: a case study of a North Carolina piedmont woodland. Journal of Vegetation Science 4: 329-340.
– reference: Schaminée, J.H.J., Stortelder, A.H.F. & Weesthoff, V. (eds.) 1995. De vegetatie von Nederland - Deel 1. Inleiding tot de plantensociologie - grondslagen, methoden en toepassingen. Opulus, Uppsala, SE.
– reference: Everitt, B.S., Landau, S., Leese, M. & Stahl, D. 2011. Cluster analysis. J. Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK.
– reference: Poore, M.E.D. 1955. The use of phytosociological methods in ecological investigations: I. The Braun-Blanquet system. Journal of Ecology 43: 226-244.
– reference: Legendre, P. & De Cáceres, M. 2013. Beta diversity as the variance of community data: dissimilarity coefficients and partitioning. Ecology Letters 16: 951-963.
– reference: Luther-Mosebach, J., Dengler, J., Schmiedel, U., Röwer, I.U., Labitzky, T. & Gröngröft, A. 2012. A first formal classification of the Hardeveld vegetation in Namaqualand, South Africa. Applied Vegetation Science 15: 401-431.
– reference: Lengyel, A., Chytrý, M. & Tichý, L. 2011. Heterogeneity-constrained random resampling of phytosociological databases. Journal of Vegetation Science 22: 175-183.
– reference: Chytrý, M. & Otýpková, Z. 2003. Plot sizes used for phytosociological sampling of European vegetation. Journal of Vegetation Science 14: 563-570.
– reference: Kent, M. 2012. Vegetation description and data analysis: a practical approach, 2nd ed. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, UK.
– reference: De'ath, G. 1999. Extended dissimilarity: a method of robust estimation of ecological distances from high beta diversity data. Plant Ecology 144: 191-199.
– reference: Grisebach, A. 1838. Ueber den Einfluss des Climas auf die Begränzung der natürlichen Floren. Linnaea 12: 159-200.
– reference: Rodwell, J.S. (ed.) 1991-2000. British plant communities. Vol. 1-5. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
– reference: Tichý, L., Chytrý, M., Hájek, M., Talbot, S.S. & Botta-Dukát, Z. 2010. OptimClass: using species-to-cluster fidelity to determine the optimal partition in classification of ecological communities. Journal of Vegetation Science 21: 287-299.
– reference: Dansereau, P. 1951. Description and recording of vegetation upon a structural basis. Ecology 32: 172-229.
– reference: ESCAVI. 2003. Australian vegetation attribute manual: National Vegetation Information System, Version 6.0. Executive Steering Committee for Australian Vegetation Information Department of the Environment and Heritage, Canberra, AU.
– reference: Gauch, H.G. Jr & Whittaker, R.H. 1981. Hierarchical classification of community data. Journal of Ecology 69: 537-557.
– reference: Willner, W. & Grabherr, G. 2007. Die Wälder und Gebüsche Österreichs - Ein Bestimmungswerk mit Tabellen. 2 vols. Spektrum Akademischer, Heidelberg, DE.
– reference: Wiser, S.K. & De Cáceres, M. 2013. Updating vegetation classifications: an example with New Zealand's woody vegetation. Journal of Vegetation Science 24: 80-93.
– reference: UNESCO. 1973. International classification and mapping of vegetation, pp. 1-93. UNESCO Ecology and Conservation Series 6. UNESCO, Paris, FR.
– reference: Eliáš, P. Jr., Sopotlieva, D., Díté, D., Hájková, P., Apostolova, I., Senko, D., Melečková, Z. & Hájek, M. 2013. Vegetation diversity of salt-rich grasslands in Southeast Europe. Applied Vegetation Science 16: 521-537.
– reference: Lengyel, A. & Podani, J. 2015. Assessing the relative importance of methodological decisions in classifications of vegetation data. Journal of Vegetation Science. 26: 804-815.
– reference: Kočí, M., Chytrý, M. & Tichý, L. 2003. Formalized reproduction of an expert-based phytosociological classification: a case study of subalpine tall-forb vegetation. Journal of Vegetation Science 14: 601-610.
– reference: Mucina, L. 1997. Classification of vegetation: past, present and future. Journal of Vegetation Science 8: 751-760.
– reference: Fosberg, F.R. 1961. A classification of vegetation for general purposes. Tropical Ecology 2: 1-28.
– reference: Sukachev, V.N. 1928. Vegetation communities: introduction to phytosociology. Kniga, Leningrad, RU. [In Russian].
– reference: Chytrý, M. (ed.) 2007-2013. Vegetace České republiky. Vol. 1-4. Academia, Praha, CZ.
– reference: Shaukat, S.S. 1989. A technique for species weighting and its utility in data reduction and minimization of misclassification. Coenoses 4: 163-168.
– reference: Hill, M.O. 1979. TWINSPAN - a FORTRAN program for arranging multivariate data in an ordered two-way table by classification of the individuals and attributes. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, US.
– reference: Roleček, J., Chytrý, M., Hájek, M., Lvončík, S. & Tichý, L. 2007. Sampling design in large-scale vegetation studies: do not sacrifice ecological thinking to statistical purism! Folia Geobotanica 42: 199-208.
– reference: Willner, W. 2006. The association concept revisited. Phytocoenologia 36: 67-76.
– reference: Botta-Dukát, Z. 2008. Validation of hierarchical classifications by splitting dataset. Acta Botanica Hungarica 50: 73-80.
– reference: Hakes, W. 1994. On the predictive power of numerical and Braun-Blanquet classification: an example from beechwoods. Journal of Vegetation Science 5: 153-160.
– reference: Jennings, M.D., Faber-Langendoen, D., Loucks, O.L., Peet, R.K. & Roberts, D. 2009. Standards for associations and alliances of the U.S. National Vegetation Classification. Ecological Monographs 79: 173-199.
– reference: Schmidtlein, S., Tichý, L., Feilhauer, H. & Faude, U. 2010. A brute-force approach to vegetation classification. Journal of Vegetation Science 21: 1162-1171.
– reference: De Candolle, A.P. 1855. Géographie botanique raisonnée ou exposition des faits principaux et des lois concernant la distribution géographique des plantes de l'époque actuelle. Masson, Paris, FR.
– reference: Cooper, A., McCann, T. & Bunce, R.G.H. 2006. The influence of sampling intensity on vegetation classification and the implications for environmental management. Environmental Conservation 33: 118-127.
– reference: Gillet, F. & Gallandat, J.-D. 1996. Integrated synusial phytosociology: some notes on a new, multiscalar approach to vegetation analysis. Journal of Vegetation Science 7: 13-18.
– reference: Dale, M. 1988. Knowing when to stop: cluster Concept-Concept Cluster. Coenoses 3: 11-32.
– reference: Braun-Blanquet, J. 1964. Pflanzensoziologie. Grundzüge der Vegetationskunde. 3. Aufl. Springer, Wien, AT.
– reference: Aho, K., Roberts, D.W. & Weaver, T. 2008. Using geometric and non-geometric internal evaluators to compare eight vegetation classification methods. Journal of Vegetation Science 19: 549-562.
– reference: Walker, D., Alsos, I.G., Bay, C., Boulanger-Lapointe, N., Breen, A.L., Bültmann, H., Christensen, T., Damgaard, C., Daniëls, F.J.A., (...) & Wisz, M.S. 2013. Rescuing valuable Arctic vegetation data for biodiversity models, ecosystem models and a panarctic vegetation classification. Arctic 66: 133-137.
– reference: De Cáceres, M., Font, X. & Oliva, F. 2010. The management of vegetation classifications with fuzzy clustering. Journal of Vegetation Science 21: 1138-1151.
– reference: Faber-Langendoen, D., Keeler-Wolf, T., Meidinger, D., Tart, D., Hoagland, B., Josse, C., Navarro, G., Ponomarenko, S., Saucier, J.-P., Weakley, A. & Comer, P. 2014. EcoVeg: a new approach to vegetation description and classification. Ecological Monographs 84: 533-561.
– reference: Faith, D.P., Minchin, P.R. & Belbin, L. 1987. Compositional dissimilarity as a robust measure of ecological distance. Vegetatio 69: 57-68.
– reference: Dengler, J., Jansen, F., Glöckler, F., Peet, R.K., De Cáceres, M., Chytrý, M., Ewald, J., Oldeland, J., Lopez-Gonzalez, G., (...) & Spencer, N. 2011. The Global Index of Vegetation-Plot Databases (GIVD): a new resource for vegetation science. Journal of Vegetation Science 22: 582-597.
– reference: Legendre, P. & Legendre, L. 2012. Numerical ecology, 3rd ed. Elsevier, Amsterdam, NL.
– reference: Orlóci, L. 1978. Multivariate analysis in vegetation research. Dr. W. Junk, The Hague, NL.
– reference: Grabherr, G., Reiter, K. & Willner, W. 2003. Towards objectivity in vegetation classification: the example of the Austrian forests. Plant Ecology 169: 21-34.
– reference: Mueller-Dombois, D. & Ellenberg, H. 1974. Aims and methods of vegetation ecology. J. Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, US.
– reference: Li, C.-F., Chytrý, M., Zelený, D., Chen, M.-Y., Chen, T.-Y., Chiou, C.-R., Hsia, Y.-J., Liu, H.-Y., Yang, S.-Z., (...) & Hsieh, C.-F. 2013. Classification of Taiwan forest vegetation. Applied Vegetation Science 16: 698-719.
– reference: Loidi, J., Biurrun, I., Campos, J.A., Garcia-Mijangos, I. & Herrera, M. 2010. A biogeographical analysis of the European Atlantic lowland heathlands. Journal of Vegetation Science 21: 832-842.
– reference: Carleton, T., Stitt, R. & Nieppola, J. 1996. Constrained indicator species analysis (COINSPAN): an extension of TWINSPAN. Journal of Vegetation Science 7: 125-130.
– reference: Barkman, J.J. 1990. A tentative typology of European scrub and forest communities based on vegetation texture and structure. Vegetatio 86: 131-141.
– reference: De Cáceres, M., Legendre, P., Wiser, S.K. & Brotons, L. 2012. Using species combinations in indicator value analyses. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 3: 973-982.
– reference: Kenkel, N.C., Juhász-Nagy, P. & Podani, J. 1989. On sampling procedures in population and community ecology. Vegetatio 83: 195-207.
– reference: Podani, J. 1994. Multivariate data analysis in ecology and systematics: a methodological guide to the SYN-TAX 5.0 package. SPB Academic, The Hague, NL.
– reference: Peet, R.K., Wentworth, T.R. & White, P.S. 1998. A flexible, multipurpose method for recording vegetation composition and structure. Castanea 63: 262-274.
– reference: Roberts, D.W. 2015. Vegetation classification by two new iterative reallocation optimization algorithms. Plant Ecology 216: 741-758.
– reference: European Commission. 2013. Interpretation manual of European Union habitats. EUR 28. European Commission, Brussels, BE.
– reference: Berg, C., Dengler, J., Abdank, A. & Isermann, M. (eds.) 2004. Die Pflanzengesellschaften Mecklenburg-Vorpommerns und ihre Gefährdung - Textband. Weissdorn, Jena, DE.
– reference: Berg, C., Abdank, A., Isermann, M., Jansen, F., Timmermann, T. & Dengler, J. 2014. Red Lists and conservation prioritization of plant communities - a methodological framework. Applied Vegetation Science 17: 403-515.
– reference: Neldner, V.J., Wilson, B.A., Thompson, E.J. & Dillewaard, H.A. 2012. Methodology for survey and mapping of regional ecosystems and vegetation communities in Queensland. Version 3.2. Updated August 2012. Queensland Herbarium, Queensland Department of Science, Information Technology, Innovation and the Arts, Brisbane, AU.
– reference: Pignatti, S., Oberdorfer, E., Schaminée, J.H.J. & Westhoff, V. 1995. On the concept of vegetation class in phytosociology. Journal of Vegetation Science 6: 143-152.
– reference: Gillet, F., de Foucault, B. & Julve, P. 1991. La phytosociologie synusiale intégrée: objets et concepts. Candollea 46: 315-340.
– reference: Otýpková, Z. & Chytrý, M. 2006. Effects of plot size on the ordination of vegetation samples. Journal of Vegetation Science 17: 465-472.
– reference: Vendramin, L., Campello, R.J.G.B. & Hruschka, E.R. 2010. Relative clustering validity criteria: a comparative overview. Statistical Analysis and Data Mining 3: 209-235.
– reference: Hill, M.O. 1989. Computerized matching of relevés and association tables, with an application to the British National Vegetation Classification. Vegetatio 83: 187-194.
– reference: De Gruijter, J.J., Bierkens, M.F.P., Brus, D.J. & Knotters, M. 2006. Sampling for natural resource monitoring. Springer, Berlin, DE.
– reference: Jiménez-Alfaro, B., Chytrý, M., Rejmánek, M. & Mucina, L. 2014. The number of vegetation types in European countries: major determinants and extrapolation to other regions. Journal of Vegetation Science 25: 863-872.
– reference: von Humboldt, A. 1807. Ideen zu einer Geographie der Pflanzen nebst einem Naturgemälde der Tropenländer. Cotta, Tübingen, DE.
– reference: Wildi, O. 2013. Data analysis in vegetation ecology, 2nd ed. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, UK.
– reference: Tichý, L., Chytrý, M. & Šmarda, P. 2011. Evaluating the stability of the classification of community data. Ecography 34: 807-813.
– reference: Roleček, J., Tichý, L., Zelený, D. & Chytrý, M. 2009. Modified TWINSPAN classification in which the hierarchy respects cluster heterogeneity. Journal of Vegetation Science 20: 596-602.
– reference: Feoli, E. 1984. Some aspects of classification and ordination of vegetation data in perspective. Studia Geobotanica 4: 7-21.
– reference: Mucina, L. & van der Maarel, E. 1989. Twenty years of numerical syntaxonomy. Vegetatio 81: 1-15.
– reference: Willner, W. 2011. Unambiguous assignment of relevés to vegetation units: the example of the Festuco-Brometea and Trifolio-Geranietea sanguinei. Tuexenia 31: 271-282.
– reference: Vymazalová, M., Axmanová, I. & Tichý, L. 2012. Effect of intra-seasonal variability on vegetation data. Journal of Vegetation Science 23: 978-984.
– reference: Zechmeister, H.G. & Mucina, L. 1994. Vegetation of European springs: high-rank syntaxa of the Montio-Cardaminetea. Journal of Vegetation Science 5: 385-402.
– reference: Tichý, L., Chytrý, M. & Botta-Dukát, Z. 2014. Semi-supervised classification of vegetation: preserving the good old units and searching for new ones. Journal of Vegetation Science 25: 1504-1512.
– reference: Dengler, J., Löbel, S. & Dolnik, C. 2009. Species constancy depends on plot size - a problem for vegetation classification and how it can be solved. Journal of Vegetation Science 20: 754-766.
– reference: Bruelheide, H. 1997. Using formal logic to classify vegetation. Folia Geobotanica 32: 41-46.
– reference: Carranza, L., Feoli, E. & Ganis, P. 1998. Analysis of vegetation structural diversity by Burnaby's similarity index. Plant Ecology 138: 77-87.
– reference: Beard, J.S. & Webb, M.J. 1972. The vegetation survey of Western Australia, its aims, objects and methods. Part I of explanatory notes to Sheet 2: Great Sandy Desert. Vegetation Survey of Western Australia: 1:1,000,000 Vegetation Series. University of Western Australia Press, Perth, AU.
– reference: Barkman, J.J. 1989. A critical evaluation of minimum area concepts. Vegetatio 85: 89-104.
– reference: Knollová, I., Chytrý, M., Tichý, L. & Hájek, O. 2005. Stratified resampling of phytosociological databases: some strategies for obtaining more representative data sets for classification studies. Journal of Vegetation Science 16: 479-486.
– reference: Dengler, J., Bergmeier, E., Willner, W. & Chytrý, M. 2013. Towards a consistent classification of European grasslands. Applied Vegetation Science 16: 518-520.
– reference: Landucci, F., Tichý, L., Šumberová, K. & Chytrý, M. 2015. Formalized classification of species-poor vegetation: a proposal of a consistent protocol for aquatic vegetation. Journal of Vegetation Science. 26: 791-803.
– reference: Botta-Dukát, Z., Kovács-Láng, E., Rédei, T., Kertész, M. & Garadnai, J. 2007. Statistical and biological consequences of preferential sampling in phytosociology: theoretical considerations and a case study. Folia Geobotanica 42: 141-152.
– year: 2011
– volume: 46
  start-page: 315
  year: 1991
  end-page: 340
  article-title: La phytosociologie synusiale intégrée: objets et concepts
  publication-title: Candollea
– volume: 36
  start-page: 67
  year: 2006
  end-page: 76
  article-title: The association concept revisited
  publication-title: Phytocoenologia
– volume: 14
  start-page: 563
  year: 2003
  end-page: 570
  article-title: Plot sizes used for phytosociological sampling of European vegetation
  publication-title: Journal of Vegetation Science
– volume: 32
  start-page: 172
  year: 1951
  end-page: 229
  article-title: Description and recording of vegetation upon a structural basis
  publication-title: Ecology
– volume: 21
  start-page: 832
  year: 2010
  end-page: 842
  article-title: A biogeographical analysis of the European Atlantic lowland heathlands
  publication-title: Journal of Vegetation Science
– volume: 26
  start-page: 791
  year: 2015
  end-page: 803
  article-title: Formalized classification of species‐poor vegetation: a proposal of a consistent protocol for aquatic vegetation
  publication-title: Journal of Vegetation Science
– start-page: 167
  year: 1978
  end-page: 200
– volume: 21
  start-page: 1162
  year: 2010
  end-page: 1171
  article-title: A brute‐force approach to vegetation classification
  publication-title: Journal of Vegetation Science
– start-page: 347
  year: 2013
  end-page: 386
– year: 1998
– volume: 50
  start-page: 73
  year: 2008
  end-page: 80
  article-title: Validation of hierarchical classifications by splitting dataset
  publication-title: Acta Botanica Hungarica
– year: 2008
– start-page: 289
  year: 1973
  end-page: 329
– year: 1972
– volume: 16
  start-page: 518
  year: 2013
  end-page: 520
  article-title: Towards a consistent classification of European grasslands
  publication-title: Applied Vegetation Science
– start-page: 1
  year: 1990
  end-page: 198
– year: 1928
– volume: 7
  start-page: 125
  year: 1996
  end-page: 130
  article-title: Constrained indicator species analysis (COINSPAN): an extension of TWINSPAN
  publication-title: Journal of Vegetation Science
– start-page: 1
  year: 1973
  end-page: 93
– volume: 14
  start-page: 601
  year: 2003
  end-page: 610
  article-title: Formalized reproduction of an expert‐based phytosociological classification: a case study of subalpine tall‐forb vegetation
  publication-title: Journal of Vegetation Science
– volume: 4
  start-page: 329
  year: 1993
  end-page: 340
  article-title: Scale dependence of vegetation–environment correlations: a case study of a North Carolina piedmont woodland
  publication-title: Journal of Vegetation Science
– volume: 42
  start-page: 199
  year: 2007
  end-page: 208
  article-title: Sampling design in large‐scale vegetation studies: do not sacrifice ecological thinking to statistical purism!
  publication-title: Folia Geobotanica
– volume: 16
  start-page: 698
  year: 2013
  end-page: 719
  article-title: Classification of Taiwan forest vegetation
  publication-title: Applied Vegetation Science
– volume: 31
  start-page: 271
  year: 2011
  end-page: 282
  article-title: Unambiguous assignment of relevés to vegetation units: the example of the Festuco‐Brometea and Trifolio‐Geranietea sanguinei
  publication-title: Tuexenia
– volume: 144
  start-page: 191
  year: 1999
  end-page: 199
  article-title: Extended dissimilarity: a method of robust estimation of ecological distances from high beta diversity data
  publication-title: Plant Ecology
– year: 1964
– year: 2007
– volume: 21
  start-page: 1138
  year: 2010
  end-page: 1151
  article-title: The management of vegetation classifications with fuzzy clustering
  publication-title: Journal of Vegetation Science
– volume: 11
  start-page: 293
  year: 1930
  end-page: 480
– volume: 169
  start-page: 21
  year: 2003
  end-page: 34
  article-title: Towards objectivity in vegetation classification: the example of the Austrian forests
  publication-title: Plant Ecology
– volume: 22
  start-page: 175
  year: 2011
  end-page: 183
  article-title: Heterogeneity‐constrained random resampling of phytosociological databases
  publication-title: Journal of Vegetation Science
– volume: 23
  start-page: 978
  year: 2012
  end-page: 984
  article-title: Effect of intra‐seasonal variability on vegetation data
  publication-title: Journal of Vegetation Science
– volume: 12
  start-page: 159
  year: 1838
  end-page: 200
  article-title: Ueber den Einfluss des Climas auf die Begränzung der natürlichen Floren
  publication-title: Linnaea
– volume: 4
  start-page: 2767
  year: 2008
  end-page: 2779
– volume: 83
  start-page: 187
  year: 1989
  end-page: 194
  article-title: Computerized matching of relevés and association tables, with an application to the British National Vegetation Classification
  publication-title: Vegetatio
– volume: 216
  start-page: 741
  year: 2015
  end-page: 758
  article-title: Vegetation classification by two new iterative reallocation optimization algorithms
  publication-title: Plant Ecology
– volume: 2
  start-page: 1
  year: 1961
  end-page: 28
  article-title: A classification of vegetation for general purposes
  publication-title: Tropical Ecology
– volume: 138
  start-page: 77
  year: 1998
  end-page: 87
  article-title: Analysis of vegetation structural diversity by Burnaby's similarity index
  publication-title: Plant Ecology
– year: 1995
– volume: 8
  start-page: 751
  year: 1997
  end-page: 760
  article-title: Classification of vegetation: past, present and future
  publication-title: Journal of Vegetation Science
– year: 1978
– volume: 21
  start-page: 287
  year: 2010
  end-page: 299
  article-title: OptimClass: using species‐to‐cluster fidelity to determine the optimal partition in classification of ecological communities
  publication-title: Journal of Vegetation Science
– start-page: 67
  year: 1978b
  end-page: 79
– volume: 20
  start-page: 754
  year: 2009
  end-page: 766
  article-title: Species constancy depends on plot size – a problem for vegetation classification and how it can be solved
  publication-title: Journal of Vegetation Science
– year: 2013
– volume: 43
  start-page: 226
  year: 1955
  end-page: 244
  article-title: The use of phytosociological methods in ecological investigations: I. The Braun‐Blanquet system
  publication-title: Journal of Ecology
– volume: 4
  start-page: 7
  year: 1984
  end-page: 21
  article-title: Some aspects of classification and ordination of vegetation data in perspective
  publication-title: Studia Geobotanica
– volume: 32
  start-page: 41
  year: 1997
  end-page: 46
  article-title: Using formal logic to classify vegetation
  publication-title: Folia Geobotanica
– volume: 22
  start-page: 582
  year: 2011
  end-page: 597
  article-title: The Global Index of Vegetation‐Plot Databases (GIVD): a new resource for vegetation science
  publication-title: Journal of Vegetation Science
– volume: 33
  start-page: 118
  year: 2006
  end-page: 127
  article-title: The influence of sampling intensity on vegetation classification and the implications for environmental management
  publication-title: Environmental Conservation
– volume: 7
  start-page: 13
  year: 1996
  end-page: 18
  article-title: Integrated synusial phytosociology: some notes on a new, multiscalar approach to vegetation analysis
  publication-title: Journal of Vegetation Science
– volume: 3
  start-page: 209
  year: 2010
  end-page: 235
  article-title: Relative clustering validity criteria: a comparative overview
  publication-title: Statistical Analysis and Data Mining
– volume: 17
  start-page: 465
  year: 2006
  end-page: 472
  article-title: Effects of plot size on the ordination of vegetation samples
  publication-title: Journal of Vegetation Science
– volume: 20
  start-page: 596
  year: 2009
  end-page: 602
  article-title: Modified TWINSPAN classification in which the hierarchy respects cluster heterogeneity
  publication-title: Journal of Vegetation Science
– volume: 26
  start-page: 804
  year: 2015
  end-page: 815
  article-title: Assessing the relative importance of methodological decisions in classifications of vegetation data
  publication-title: Journal of Vegetation Science
– year: 1978c
– volume: 34
  start-page: 807
  year: 2011
  end-page: 813
  article-title: Evaluating the stability of the classification of community data
  publication-title: Ecography
– volume: 86
  start-page: 131
  year: 1990
  end-page: 141
  article-title: A tentative typology of European scrub and forest communities based on vegetation texture and structure
  publication-title: Vegetatio
– year: 1979
– volume: 4
  start-page: 163
  year: 1989
  end-page: 168
  article-title: A technique for species weighting and its utility in data reduction and minimization of misclassification
  publication-title: Coenoses
– year: 1994
– start-page: 28
  year: 2013
  end-page: 70
– start-page: 203
  year: 1978
  end-page: 233
– volume: 3
  start-page: 973
  year: 2012
  end-page: 982
  article-title: Using species combinations in indicator value analyses
  publication-title: Methods in Ecology and Evolution
– volume: 16
  start-page: 521
  year: 2013
  end-page: 537
  article-title: Vegetation diversity of salt‐rich grasslands in Southeast Europe
  publication-title: Applied Vegetation Science
– volume: 5
  start-page: 385
  year: 1994
  end-page: 402
  article-title: Vegetation of European springs: high‐rank syntaxa of the
  publication-title: Journal of Vegetation Science
– volume: 85
  start-page: 89
  year: 1989
  end-page: 104
  article-title: A critical evaluation of minimum area concepts
  publication-title: Vegetatio
– volume: 84
  start-page: 533
  year: 2014
  end-page: 561
  article-title: EcoVeg: a new approach to vegetation description and classification
  publication-title: Ecological Monographs
– volume: 25
  start-page: 863
  year: 2014
  end-page: 872
  article-title: The number of vegetation types in European countries: major determinants and extrapolation to other regions
  publication-title: Journal of Vegetation Science
– volume: 83
  start-page: 195
  year: 1989
  end-page: 207
  article-title: On sampling procedures in population and community ecology
  publication-title: Vegetatio
– volume: 69
  start-page: 57
  year: 1987
  end-page: 68
  article-title: Compositional dissimilarity as a robust measure of ecological distance
  publication-title: Vegetatio
– year: 2004
– volume: 79
  start-page: 173
  year: 2009
  end-page: 199
  article-title: Standards for associations and alliances of the U.S. National Vegetation Classification
  publication-title: Ecological Monographs
– start-page: 111
  year: 1980
  end-page: 165
– volume: 23
  start-page: 387
  year: 2012
  end-page: 393
  article-title: Towards consistency in vegetation classification
  publication-title: Journal of Vegetation Science
– volume: 16
  start-page: 479
  year: 2005
  end-page: 486
  article-title: Stratified resampling of phytosociological databases: some strategies for obtaining more representative data sets for classification studies
  publication-title: Journal of Vegetation Science
– volume: 24
  start-page: 80
  year: 2013
  end-page: 93
  article-title: Updating vegetation classifications: an example with New Zealand's woody vegetation
  publication-title: Journal of Vegetation Science
– volume: 15
  start-page: 401
  year: 2012
  end-page: 431
  article-title: A first formal classification of the Hardeveld vegetation in Namaqualand, South Africa
  publication-title: Applied Vegetation Science
– volume: 13
  start-page: 11
  year: 1993
  end-page: 21
  article-title: “Pflanzengesellschaft” als Typus und als Gesamtheit von Vegetationsausschnitten. Versuch einer begrifflichen Klärung
  publication-title: Tuexenia
– year: 1807
– volume: 19
  start-page: 549
  year: 2008
  end-page: 562
  article-title: Using geometric and non‐geometric internal evaluators to compare eight vegetation classification methods
  publication-title: Journal of Vegetation Science
– year: 1855
– year: 2003
– volume: 17
  start-page: 403
  year: 2014
  end-page: 515
  article-title: Red Lists and conservation prioritization of plant communities – a methodological framework
  publication-title: Applied Vegetation Science
– volume: 16
  start-page: 951
  year: 2013
  end-page: 963
  article-title: Beta diversity as the variance of community data: dissimilarity coefficients and partitioning
  publication-title: Ecology Letters
– volume: 63
  start-page: 262
  year: 1998
  end-page: 274
  article-title: A flexible, multipurpose method for recording vegetation composition and structure
  publication-title: Castanea
– volume: 6
  start-page: 143
  year: 1995
  end-page: 152
  article-title: On the concept of vegetation class in phytosociology
  publication-title: Journal of Vegetation Science
– start-page: 1
  year: 1978a
  end-page: 31
– volume: 69
  start-page: 537
  year: 1981
  end-page: 557
  article-title: Hierarchical classification of community data
  publication-title: Journal of Ecology
– volume: 3
  start-page: 11
  year: 1988
  end-page: 32
  article-title: Knowing when to stop: cluster Concept‐Concept Cluster
  publication-title: Coenoses
– year: 2012
– volume: 66
  start-page: 133
  year: 2013
  end-page: 137
  article-title: Rescuing valuable Arctic vegetation data for biodiversity models, ecosystem models and a panarctic vegetation classification
  publication-title: Arctic
– year: 2006
– volume: 5
  start-page: 153
  year: 1994
  end-page: 160
  article-title: On the predictive power of numerical and Braun‐Blanquet classification: an example from beechwoods
  publication-title: Journal of Vegetation Science
– year: 1974
– volume: 25
  start-page: 1504
  year: 2014
  end-page: 1512
  article-title: Semi‐supervised classification of vegetation: preserving the good old units and searching for new ones
  publication-title: Journal of Vegetation Science
– year: 1991
– volume: 42
  start-page: 141
  year: 2007
  end-page: 152
  article-title: Statistical and biological consequences of preferential sampling in phytosociology: theoretical considerations and a case study
  publication-title: Folia Geobotanica
– volume: 81
  start-page: 1
  year: 1989
  end-page: 15
  article-title: Twenty years of numerical syntaxonomy
  publication-title: Vegetatio
– volume: 63
  start-page: 262
  year: 1998
  ident: e_1_2_10_73_1
  article-title: A flexible, multipurpose method for recording vegetation composition and structure
  publication-title: Castanea
– ident: e_1_2_10_74_1
  doi: 10.2307/3236265
– ident: e_1_2_10_100_1
  doi: 10.1007/978-94-009-9183-5
– ident: e_1_2_10_27_1
  doi: 10.1016/B978-008045405-4.00533-4
– ident: e_1_2_10_106_1
  doi: 10.2307/3235862
– volume-title: Australian vegetation attribute manual: National Vegetation Information System, Version 6.0
  year: 2003
  ident: e_1_2_10_34_1
– ident: e_1_2_10_23_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2012.00246.x
– volume: 4
  start-page: 163
  year: 1989
  ident: e_1_2_10_84_1
  article-title: A technique for species weighting and its utility in data reduction and minimization of misclassification
  publication-title: Coenoses
– ident: e_1_2_10_77_1
  doi: 10.2307/3235591
– volume-title: TWINSPAN – a FORTRAN program for arranging multivariate data in an ordered two‐way table by classification of the individuals and attributes
  year: 1979
  ident: e_1_2_10_48_1
– ident: e_1_2_10_13_1
  doi: 10.1007/BF02803883
– ident: e_1_2_10_98_1
  doi: 10.1007/978-94-009-9183-5_1
– ident: e_1_2_10_57_1
  doi: 10.1111/jvs.12277
– ident: e_1_2_10_55_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2005.tb02388.x
– ident: e_1_2_10_58_1
  doi: 10.1111/ele.12141
– ident: e_1_2_10_71_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2006.tb02467.x
– ident: e_1_2_10_79_1
  doi: 10.1017/9780521235587
– volume-title: Vegetation communities: introduction to phytosociology
  year: 1928
  ident: e_1_2_10_85_1
– volume: 13
  start-page: 11
  year: 1993
  ident: e_1_2_10_65_1
  article-title: “Pflanzengesellschaft” als Typus und als Gesamtheit von Vegetationsausschnitten. Versuch einer begrifflichen Klärung
  publication-title: Tuexenia
– ident: e_1_2_10_96_1
  doi: 10.14430/arctic4281
– ident: e_1_2_10_67_1
  doi: 10.1007/BF00045509
– ident: e_1_2_10_94_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2012.01416.x
– ident: e_1_2_10_91_1
– ident: e_1_2_10_61_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2010.01225.x
– ident: e_1_2_10_87_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2010.06599.x
– volume-title: The vegetation survey of Western Australia, its aims, objects and methods. Part I of explanatory notes to Sheet 2: Great Sandy Desert. Vegetation Survey of Western Australia: 1:1,000,000 Vegetation Series
  year: 1972
  ident: e_1_2_10_7_1
– volume-title: Pflanzensoziologie – Grundlagen und Methoden
  year: 1994
  ident: e_1_2_10_31_1
– ident: e_1_2_10_50_1
  doi: 10.1890/07-1804.1
– ident: e_1_2_10_11_1
  doi: 10.1007/BF02893880
– ident: e_1_2_10_72_1
  doi: 10.1002/9781118452592.ch2
– start-page: 1
  volume-title: Australian soil and land survey. Field handbook
  year: 1990
  ident: e_1_2_10_95_1
– ident: e_1_2_10_62_1
  doi: 10.1111/avsc.12025
– ident: e_1_2_10_86_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2009.01143.x
– ident: e_1_2_10_2_1
  doi: 10.3170/2008-8-18406
– volume-title: Die Wälder und Gebüsche Österreichs – Ein Bestimmungswerk mit Tabellen
  year: 2007
  ident: e_1_2_10_104_1
– ident: e_1_2_10_66_1
  doi: 10.2307/3237019
– volume: 4
  start-page: 7
  year: 1984
  ident: e_1_2_10_39_1
  article-title: Some aspects of classification and ordination of vegetation data in perspective
  publication-title: Studia Geobotanica
– ident: e_1_2_10_33_1
  doi: 10.1111/avsc.12017
– ident: e_1_2_10_105_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2012.01450.x
– volume-title: De vegetatie von Nederland – Deel 1. Inleiding tot de plantensociologie – grondslagen, methoden en toepassingen
  year: 1995
  ident: e_1_2_10_82_1
– ident: e_1_2_10_22_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2010.01211.x
– volume-title: Die Pflanzengesellschaften Mecklenburg‐Vorpommerns und ihre Gefährdung – Textband
  year: 2004
  ident: e_1_2_10_8_1
– ident: e_1_2_10_41_1
  doi: 10.2307/2259682
– ident: e_1_2_10_64_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1654-109X.2011.01173.x
– start-page: 111
  volume-title: Classification of plant communities
  year: 1980
  ident: e_1_2_10_4_1
– ident: e_1_2_10_30_1
  doi: 10.1111/avsc.12041
– ident: e_1_2_10_17_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2003.tb02183.x
– ident: e_1_2_10_49_1
  doi: 10.1007/BF00031691
– ident: e_1_2_10_83_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2010.01221.x
– ident: e_1_2_10_25_1
  doi: 10.1007/3-540-33161-1
– volume: 33
  start-page: 118
  year: 2006
  ident: e_1_2_10_18_1
  article-title: The influence of sampling intensity on vegetation classification and the implications for environmental management
  publication-title: Environmental Conservation
  doi: 10.1017/S0376892906002967
– volume: 2
  start-page: 1
  year: 1961
  ident: e_1_2_10_40_1
  article-title: A classification of vegetation for general purposes
  publication-title: Tropical Ecology
– ident: e_1_2_10_52_1
– ident: e_1_2_10_3_1
  doi: 10.1007/978-94-009-9183-5_6
– volume: 3
  start-page: 11
  year: 1988
  ident: e_1_2_10_19_1
  article-title: Knowing when to stop: cluster Concept‐Concept Cluster
  publication-title: Coenoses
– volume-title: Ideen zu einer Geographie der Pflanzen nebst einem Naturgemälde der Tropenländer
  year: 1807
  ident: e_1_2_10_93_1
– ident: e_1_2_10_97_1
  doi: 10.1007/978-94-010-2701-4_20
– ident: e_1_2_10_36_1
  doi: 10.1002/9780470977811
– ident: e_1_2_10_88_1
  doi: 10.1111/jvs.12193
– volume: 46
  start-page: 315
  year: 1991
  ident: e_1_2_10_43_1
  article-title: La phytosociologie synusiale intégrée: objets et concepts
  publication-title: Candollea
– ident: e_1_2_10_29_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2011.01265.x
– ident: e_1_2_10_9_1
  doi: 10.1111/avsc.12093
– volume-title: Géographie botanique raisonnée ou exposition des faits principaux et des lois concernant la distribution géographique des plantes de l'époque actuelle
  year: 1855
  ident: e_1_2_10_24_1
  doi: 10.5962/bhl.title.30020
– ident: e_1_2_10_42_1
  doi: 10.2307/3236411
– ident: e_1_2_10_10_1
  doi: 10.1556/ABot.50.2008.1-2.4
– volume-title: Multivariate analysis in vegetation research
  year: 1978
  ident: e_1_2_10_70_1
– volume-title: Aims and methods of vegetation ecology
  year: 1974
  ident: e_1_2_10_68_1
– volume-title: Interpretation manual of European Union habitats. EUR 28
  year: 2013
  ident: e_1_2_10_35_1
– volume-title: Vegetation description and data analysis: a practical approach
  year: 2012
  ident: e_1_2_10_54_1
– ident: e_1_2_10_15_1
  doi: 10.1023/A:1009760808505
– start-page: 1
  volume-title: International classification and mapping of vegetation
  year: 1973
  ident: e_1_2_10_90_1
– ident: e_1_2_10_26_1
  doi: 10.1023/A:1009763730207
– volume-title: Multivariate data analysis in ecology and systematics: a methodological guide to the SYN‐TAX 5.0 package
  year: 1994
  ident: e_1_2_10_75_1
– ident: e_1_2_10_78_1
  doi: 10.1007/s11258-014-0403-2
– ident: e_1_2_10_51_1
  doi: 10.1111/jvs.12145
– ident: e_1_2_10_59_1
  doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-53868-0.50018-6
– ident: e_1_2_10_56_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2003.tb02187.x
– ident: e_1_2_10_45_1
  doi: 10.1023/A:1026280428467
– ident: e_1_2_10_76_1
  doi: 10.2307/2257132
– ident: e_1_2_10_20_1
  doi: 10.2307/1930415
– start-page: 203
  volume-title: Classification of plant communities
  year: 1978
  ident: e_1_2_10_89_1
– volume-title: Pflanzensoziologie. Grundzüge der Vegetationskunde. 3. Aufl
  year: 1964
  ident: e_1_2_10_12_1
– ident: e_1_2_10_60_1
  doi: 10.1111/jvs.12268
– ident: e_1_2_10_32_1
– volume: 31
  start-page: 271
  year: 2011
  ident: e_1_2_10_103_1
  article-title: Unambiguous assignment of relevés to vegetation units: the example of the Festuco‐Brometea and Trifolio‐Geranietea sanguinei
  publication-title: Tuexenia
– ident: e_1_2_10_21_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2011.01354.x
– ident: e_1_2_10_6_1
  doi: 10.1007/BF00031729
– volume: 12
  start-page: 159
  year: 1838
  ident: e_1_2_10_46_1
  article-title: Ueber den Einfluss des Climas auf die Begränzung der natürlichen Floren
  publication-title: Linnaea
– ident: e_1_2_10_63_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2010.01204.x
– ident: e_1_2_10_81_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2009.01062.x
– ident: e_1_2_10_14_1
  doi: 10.2307/3236425
– volume-title: Vegetace České republiky
  year: 2007
  ident: e_1_2_10_16_1
– volume-title: Methodology for survey and mapping of regional ecosystems and vegetation communities in Queensland
  year: 2012
  ident: e_1_2_10_69_1
– ident: e_1_2_10_101_1
  doi: 10.1002/9781118562543
– ident: e_1_2_10_102_1
  doi: 10.1127/0340-269X/2006/0036-0067
– ident: e_1_2_10_92_1
  doi: 10.1002/sam.10080
– ident: e_1_2_10_5_1
  doi: 10.1007/BF00042259
– ident: e_1_2_10_37_1
  doi: 10.1890/13-2334.1
– ident: e_1_2_10_44_1
  doi: 10.1002/9781118452592.ch12
– ident: e_1_2_10_99_1
  doi: 10.1007/978-94-009-9183-5
– ident: e_1_2_10_53_1
  doi: 10.1007/BF00031692
– ident: e_1_2_10_80_1
  doi: 10.1007/BF02893886
– ident: e_1_2_10_38_1
  doi: 10.1007/BF00038687
– ident: e_1_2_10_28_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2009.01073.x
– ident: e_1_2_10_47_1
  doi: 10.2307/3236147
SSID ssj0017959
Score 2.4797604
Snippet AIMS: Classification of vegetation is an essential tool to describe, understand, predict and manage biodiversity. Given the multiplicity of approaches to...
Aims: Classification of vegetation is an essential tool to describe, understand, predict and manage biodiversity. Given the multiplicity of approaches to...
Aims Classification of vegetation is an essential tool to describe, understand, predict and manage biodiversity. Given the multiplicity of approaches to...
Aims Classification of vegetation is an essential tool to describe, understand, predict and manage biodiversity. Given the multiplicity of approaches to...
Aims:Classification of vegetation is an essential tool to describe, understand, predict and manage biodiversity. Given the multiplicity of approaches to...
SourceID wageningen
hal
proquest
crossref
wiley
jstor
istex
fao
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Enrichment Source
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 543
SubjectTerms Alterra - Vegetatie, bos- en landschapsecologie
Alterra - Vegetation, forest and landscape ecology
Assignment rule
biodiversity
Biodiversity and Ecology
Botanics
Braun-Blanquet approach
Classification
Classification system
Consistent classification section
EcoVeg approach
Environmental Engineering
Environmental Sciences
guidelines
Life Sciences
Nature Conservation and Plant Ecology
Natuurbeheer en Plantenecologie
PE&RC
Phytosociology
Plant Ecology and Nature Conservation
Plantenecologie en Natuurbeheer
SYNTHESIS
Vegetal Biology
Vegetatie, Bos- en Landschapsecologie
Vegetation
Vegetation continuum
Vegetation type
vegetation types
Vegetation, Forest and Landscape Ecology
Vegetation-plot database
Title comparative framework for broad‐scale plot‐based vegetation classification
URI https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-QJ3GJ5WS-Q/fulltext.pdf
https://www.jstor.org/stable/43916595
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Favsc.12179
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1710610422
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1722180680
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1803089334
https://hal.science/hal-01211250
http://www.narcis.nl/publication/RecordID/oai:library.wur.nl:wurpubs%2F495020
Volume 18
WOSCitedRecordID wos000361181500002&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVWIB
  databaseName: Wiley Online Library Full Collection 2020
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1654-109X
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0017959
  issn: 1402-2001
  databaseCode: DRFUL
  dateStart: 19980101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com
  providerName: Wiley-Blackwell
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3NbtNAEB61SQ-98F_VbUHmR0ggWXK8tteWuIRCWlVV1BJCe1utd70FEdlVnKRw4xF4Rp6EmY3tEAlVQlzirD0-eHZm9xt75huAF7TnmSgwns8wRAkzzrwszjPP6CTyVazCRC6bTfDhMLm8TM824E1TC7Pkh2hfuJFn2PWaHFxm1R9OLheVIm4Enm5CN0DDjTrQffdhMD5tvyJQH21bXUQlyDiu6Ukpk2d199qGtGlkib-fKSmyS3r-1uQpriHQ7Rt09sJWP62DWrsrDe7-3_Pcgzs1GnX7S_O5Dxt58QC23paIGL8_hLO-q1bk4K5p8rhcBLpuNi2l_vXjZ4WTnLvXk3KGA9oTtbvIr-okRlcROKdsJDt8BOPB-4-Hx17dgcFT3E9SD-EVT3LZM74OAhlrnoVGYQAYpiELcgRnmkc67skkCxEaqlizQKs41oaz2DDF2A50irLId8Gljnk6kixN4iyUKkmNCnLT0zIz9DJVO_CqmQahanpy6pIxEU2YQgoSVkEOPG9lr5ekHH-V2sXZFPIKV0sxHgXEpYeI0udpz4FnOMXtvUSxfdw_FXTOct4hLlyg0EtrAa2YnH6lNDgeiYvhkTg_YUcn0cVInDuwY02kFbTVzFEaOXDQ2Iyol4ZK9DhF4US95sDT9jI6NX2pkUVezkkmQOhFbVFukUmIaihlLHSArexRFNSDqrLPVJuduJlPRTGhA_p4JTAmxiDBgdfWHG_RoOh_Gh3af3v_IrwP26jsaJnyeACd2XSeP4YttZh9qaZPaif9DRAiPwg
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
linkToHtml http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3NbtNAEB7RphK98F_VUMD8CAkkS47X9trHUEhDCVFLGtrbar3rLYjIruIkhRuPwDPyJMxsHIdIqBLikmSd8cGzM7vfrGe-AXhOe56JAuP5DEOUMOPMy-I884xOIl_FKkzkotkEHwySs7P0qM7NoVqYBT9Ec-BGnmHXa3JwOpD-w8vlvFJEjsDTDWiFaEdo4K03H7ujfvMagRpp2_IiqkHGcc1PSqk8q7vXdqQNI0v8_ExZkS1S9LdlouIaBN2-RG8vbPnTOqq121L35n8-0C24UeNRt7MwoNtwLS_uwNbrEjHj97tw1HHVih7cNctMLhehrptNSql__fhZ4TTn7sW4nOKAdkXtzvPzOo3RVQTPKR_JDu_BqPv2ZL_n1T0YPMX9JPUQYPEkl23j6yCQseZZaBSGgGEasiBHeKZ5pOO2TLIQwaGKNQu0imNtOIsNU4ztwGZRFvkuuNQzT0eSpUmchVIlqVFBbtpaZoaOU7UDL5fzIFRNUE59MsZiGaiQgoRVkAPPGtmLBS3HX6V2cTqFPMf1UoyGAbHpIab0edp24CnOcXMvkWz3On1B1yzrHSLDOQq9sCbQiMnJV0qE45E4HRyI40N2cBidDsWxAzvWRhpBW88cpZEDe0ujEfXiUIk2pzicyNcceNL8jW5N72pkkZczkgkQfFFjlCtkEiIbShkLHWArgxQFdaGq7DPVdicuZxNRjOkLvbwSGBVjmODAK2uPV2hQdD4N9-2v-_8i_Biu904-9EX_3eD9A9hGxUeLBMg92JxOZvlD2FLz6Zdq8qj22N8Q9kL4
linkToPdf http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3NbtNAEB7RpEK98F_VUMD8CIlKlhKv7bWPoSUtJYpSQmhvq_WutyAiO4qTFG48As_IkzCzcRwioUqIS5y1xwfPzux-Y898A_CS9jwT-sZrMQxRgpQzL42y1DM6DlsqUkEsl80meL8fX1wkgyo3h2phlvwQ9Qs38gy7XpODZxNt_vByuSgVkSPwZAuaAXWRaUDz6EN31Ks_I1AjbVteRDXIOK74SSmVZ333xo60ZWSBv58pK7JJiv62SlTcgKA7V-jtuS1_2kS1dlvq3v7PB7oDtyo86naWBnQXbmT5Pdh-UyBm_H4fBh1XrenBXbPK5HIR6rrptJD614-fJU5z5k7GxQwHtCtqd5FdVmmMriJ4TvlIdvgARt23Hw9PvKoHg6d4K048BFg8zmTbtLTvy0jzNDAKQ8AgCZifITzTPNRRW8ZpgOBQRZr5WkWRNpxFhinGdqGRF3m2By71zNOhZEkcpYFUcWKUn5m2lqmh16nagdereRCqIiinPhljsQpUSEHCKsiBF7XsZEnL8VepPZxOIS9xvRSjoU9seogpWzxpO_Ac57i-l0i2Tzo9Qecs6x0iwwUKvbImUIvJ6VdKhOOhOO8fi7NTdnwang_FmQO71kZqQVvPHCahA_sroxHV4lCKNqc4nMjXHHhWX0a3pm81Ms-KOcn4CL6oMco1MjGRDSWMBQ6wtUGKnLpQlfaZKrsTV_OpyMd0QC8vBUbFGCY4cGDt8RoNis6n4aH99_BfhJ_CzcFRV_Te9d8_gh3Ue7jMf9yHxmw6zx7DtlrMvpTTJ5XD_gY7d0Jz
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A+comparative+framework+for+broad-scale+plot-based+vegetation+classification&rft.jtitle=Applied+vegetation+science&rft.au=De+Caceres%2C+Miquel&rft.au=Chytry%2C+Milan&rft.au=Agrillo%2C+Emiliano&rft.au=Attorre%2C+Fabio&rft.date=2015-10-01&rft.pub=Wiley+Subscription+Services%2C+Inc&rft.issn=1402-2001&rft.eissn=1654-109X&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=543&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Favsc.12179&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT&rft.externalDocID=3801954431
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1402-2001&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1402-2001&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1402-2001&client=summon