Quantification of Adequate Bowel Preparation for Screening or Surveillance Colonoscopy in Men

Bowel preparation is defined as adequate if it is sufficient for identification of polyps greater than 5 mm. However, adequate preparation has not been quantified. We performed a prospective observational study to provide an objective definition of adequate preparation, based on the Boston Bowel Pre...

Celý popis

Uložené v:
Podrobná bibliografia
Vydané v:Gastroenterology (New York, N.Y. 1943) Ročník 150; číslo 2; s. 396 - 405; quiz e14-5
Hlavní autori: Clark, Brian T, Protiva, Petr, Nagar, Anil, Imaeda, Avlin, Ciarleglio, Maria M, Deng, Yanhong, Laine, Loren
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:English
Vydavateľské údaje: United States 01.02.2016
Predmet:
ISSN:1528-0012
On-line prístup:Zistit podrobnosti o prístupe
Tagy: Pridať tag
Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!
Abstract Bowel preparation is defined as adequate if it is sufficient for identification of polyps greater than 5 mm. However, adequate preparation has not been quantified. We performed a prospective observational study to provide an objective definition of adequate preparation, based on the Boston Bowel Prep Scale (BBPS, which consists of 0-3 points for each of 3 colon segments). We collected data from 438 men who underwent screening or surveillance colonoscopies and then repeat colonoscopy examinations within 60 days by a different blinded endoscopist (1161 colon segments total) at the West Haven Veterans Affairs Medical Center from January 2014 to February 2015. Missed polyps were defined as those detected on the second examination of patients with the best possible bowel preparation (colon segment BBPS score of 3) on the second examination. The primary outcome was the proportion of colon segments with adenomas larger than 5 mm that were missed in the first examination. We postulated that the miss rate was noninferior for segments with BBPS scores of 2 vs those with BBPS scores of 3 (noninferiority margin, <5%). Our secondary hypotheses were that miss rates were higher in segments with BBPS scores of 1 vs those with scores of 3 or of 2. The adjusted proportion with missed adenomas greater than 5 mm was noninferior for segments with BBPS scores of 2 (5.2%) vs those with BBPS scores of 3 (5.6%) (a difference of -0.4%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.9% to 2.2%). Of study subjects, 347 (79.2%) had BBPS scores of 2 or greater in all segments on the initial examination. A higher proportion of segments with BBPS scores of 1 had missed adenomas larger than 5 mm (15.9%) than segments with BBPS scores of 3 (5.6%) (a difference of 10.3%; 95% CI, 2.7%-17.9%) or 2 (5.2%) (a difference of 10.7%; 95% CI, 3.2%-18.1%). Screening and surveillance intervals based solely on the findings at the first examination would have been incorrect for 16.3% of patients with BBPS scores of 3 in all segments, for 15.3% with BBPS scores of 2 or 3 in all segments, and for 43.5% of patients with a BBPS score of 1 in 1 or more segments. Patients with BBPS scores of 2 or 3 for all colon segments have adequate bowel preparation for the detection of adenomas larger than 5 mm and should return for screening or surveillance colonoscopy at standard guideline-recommended intervals. Colon segments with a BBPS score of 1 have a significantly higher rate of missed adenomas larger than 5 mm than segments with scores of 2 or 3. This finding supports a recommendation for early repeat colonoscopic evaluation in patients with a BBPS score of 0 or 1 in any colon segment.
AbstractList BACKGROUND & AIMSBowel preparation is defined as adequate if it is sufficient for identification of polyps greater than 5 mm. However, adequate preparation has not been quantified. We performed a prospective observational study to provide an objective definition of adequate preparation, based on the Boston Bowel Prep Scale (BBPS, which consists of 0-3 points for each of 3 colon segments).METHODSWe collected data from 438 men who underwent screening or surveillance colonoscopies and then repeat colonoscopy examinations within 60 days by a different blinded endoscopist (1161 colon segments total) at the West Haven Veterans Affairs Medical Center from January 2014 to February 2015. Missed polyps were defined as those detected on the second examination of patients with the best possible bowel preparation (colon segment BBPS score of 3) on the second examination. The primary outcome was the proportion of colon segments with adenomas larger than 5 mm that were missed in the first examination. We postulated that the miss rate was noninferior for segments with BBPS scores of 2 vs those with BBPS scores of 3 (noninferiority margin, <5%). Our secondary hypotheses were that miss rates were higher in segments with BBPS scores of 1 vs those with scores of 3 or of 2.RESULTSThe adjusted proportion with missed adenomas greater than 5 mm was noninferior for segments with BBPS scores of 2 (5.2%) vs those with BBPS scores of 3 (5.6%) (a difference of -0.4%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.9% to 2.2%). Of study subjects, 347 (79.2%) had BBPS scores of 2 or greater in all segments on the initial examination. A higher proportion of segments with BBPS scores of 1 had missed adenomas larger than 5 mm (15.9%) than segments with BBPS scores of 3 (5.6%) (a difference of 10.3%; 95% CI, 2.7%-17.9%) or 2 (5.2%) (a difference of 10.7%; 95% CI, 3.2%-18.1%). Screening and surveillance intervals based solely on the findings at the first examination would have been incorrect for 16.3% of patients with BBPS scores of 3 in all segments, for 15.3% with BBPS scores of 2 or 3 in all segments, and for 43.5% of patients with a BBPS score of 1 in 1 or more segments.CONCLUSIONSPatients with BBPS scores of 2 or 3 for all colon segments have adequate bowel preparation for the detection of adenomas larger than 5 mm and should return for screening or surveillance colonoscopy at standard guideline-recommended intervals. Colon segments with a BBPS score of 1 have a significantly higher rate of missed adenomas larger than 5 mm than segments with scores of 2 or 3. This finding supports a recommendation for early repeat colonoscopic evaluation in patients with a BBPS score of 0 or 1 in any colon segment.
Bowel preparation is defined as adequate if it is sufficient for identification of polyps greater than 5 mm. However, adequate preparation has not been quantified. We performed a prospective observational study to provide an objective definition of adequate preparation, based on the Boston Bowel Prep Scale (BBPS, which consists of 0-3 points for each of 3 colon segments). We collected data from 438 men who underwent screening or surveillance colonoscopies and then repeat colonoscopy examinations within 60 days by a different blinded endoscopist (1161 colon segments total) at the West Haven Veterans Affairs Medical Center from January 2014 to February 2015. Missed polyps were defined as those detected on the second examination of patients with the best possible bowel preparation (colon segment BBPS score of 3) on the second examination. The primary outcome was the proportion of colon segments with adenomas larger than 5 mm that were missed in the first examination. We postulated that the miss rate was noninferior for segments with BBPS scores of 2 vs those with BBPS scores of 3 (noninferiority margin, <5%). Our secondary hypotheses were that miss rates were higher in segments with BBPS scores of 1 vs those with scores of 3 or of 2. The adjusted proportion with missed adenomas greater than 5 mm was noninferior for segments with BBPS scores of 2 (5.2%) vs those with BBPS scores of 3 (5.6%) (a difference of -0.4%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.9% to 2.2%). Of study subjects, 347 (79.2%) had BBPS scores of 2 or greater in all segments on the initial examination. A higher proportion of segments with BBPS scores of 1 had missed adenomas larger than 5 mm (15.9%) than segments with BBPS scores of 3 (5.6%) (a difference of 10.3%; 95% CI, 2.7%-17.9%) or 2 (5.2%) (a difference of 10.7%; 95% CI, 3.2%-18.1%). Screening and surveillance intervals based solely on the findings at the first examination would have been incorrect for 16.3% of patients with BBPS scores of 3 in all segments, for 15.3% with BBPS scores of 2 or 3 in all segments, and for 43.5% of patients with a BBPS score of 1 in 1 or more segments. Patients with BBPS scores of 2 or 3 for all colon segments have adequate bowel preparation for the detection of adenomas larger than 5 mm and should return for screening or surveillance colonoscopy at standard guideline-recommended intervals. Colon segments with a BBPS score of 1 have a significantly higher rate of missed adenomas larger than 5 mm than segments with scores of 2 or 3. This finding supports a recommendation for early repeat colonoscopic evaluation in patients with a BBPS score of 0 or 1 in any colon segment.
Author Protiva, Petr
Ciarleglio, Maria M
Nagar, Anil
Imaeda, Avlin
Deng, Yanhong
Clark, Brian T
Laine, Loren
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Brian T
  surname: Clark
  fullname: Clark, Brian T
  organization: Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Petr
  surname: Protiva
  fullname: Protiva, Petr
  organization: Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Anil
  surname: Nagar
  fullname: Nagar, Anil
  organization: Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Avlin
  surname: Imaeda
  fullname: Imaeda, Avlin
  organization: Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Maria M
  surname: Ciarleglio
  fullname: Ciarleglio, Maria M
  organization: Yale Center for Analytical Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Yanhong
  surname: Deng
  fullname: Deng, Yanhong
  organization: Yale Center for Analytical Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Loren
  surname: Laine
  fullname: Laine, Loren
  email: loren.laine@yale.edu
  organization: Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut. Electronic address: loren.laine@yale.edu
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26439436$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNo1kN1LwzAUxYMo7kP_A5E8-tJ6k36keZzDL5ioqI9S0vRmdHRJl7TK_ns3Nl_O4XJ-HC5nQk6ts0jIFYOYQZbcruKlCr13MQeWxSBjSNkJGbOMFxEA4yMyCWEFADIp2DkZ8TxNZJrkY_L9PijbN6bRqm-cpc7QWY2bQfVI79wvtvTNY6f8ITXO0w_tEW1jl3R_DP4Hm7ZVViOdu9ZZF7TrtrSx9AXtBTkzqg14efQp-Xq4_5w_RYvXx-f5bBFpAaKPJKpCMqGFVjnUgBLyAorKVHlSmQKgrnidSsWMETKr6prvKCNwp0zpKhV8Sm4OvZ13mwFDX66boHH_F7ohlEzkIBnLudyh10d0qNZYl51v1spvy_9J-B-0UmZo
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rgmxen_2024_11_004
crossref_primary_10_14309_ajg_0000000000002972
crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000023541
crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000030355
crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000012645
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cgh_2022_03_051
crossref_primary_10_3904_kjim_2023_334
crossref_primary_10_1177_17562848231160625
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11938_017_0126_2
crossref_primary_10_1097_SGA_0000000000000807
crossref_primary_10_1080_17474124_2018_1478728
crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjgast_2021_000736
crossref_primary_10_1080_00365521_2022_2153618
crossref_primary_10_1177_2050640619854671
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gie_2024_04_015
crossref_primary_10_1097_MCG_0000000000002000
crossref_primary_10_3390_e21030256
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cgh_2016_03_044
crossref_primary_10_1080_00365521_2022_2132533
crossref_primary_10_1111_den_14635
crossref_primary_10_2196_26703
crossref_primary_10_1111_jgh_14613
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11938_017_0119_1
crossref_primary_10_1055_a_1352_4583
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gie_2025_02_010
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10620_024_08610_7
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gie_2017_06_012
crossref_primary_10_1111_jgh_15022
crossref_primary_10_1111_jgh_16079
crossref_primary_10_1177_17562848211020286
crossref_primary_10_1097_MOG_0000000000000983
crossref_primary_10_1080_17474124_2017_1338947
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejim_2021_08_010
crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000012431
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rgmx_2024_11_011
crossref_primary_10_1055_a_1178_9844
crossref_primary_10_14309_ajg_0000000000002564
crossref_primary_10_12998_wjcc_v9_i15_3607
crossref_primary_10_1213_ANE_0000000000004212
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41393_017_0025_3
crossref_primary_10_3748_wjg_v27_i45_7748
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00384_025_04931_9
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_018_6025_3
crossref_primary_10_1177_10547738211067326
crossref_primary_10_1053_j_gastro_2015_12_024
crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000020799
crossref_primary_10_4253_wjge_v15_i5_338
crossref_primary_10_1111_jebm_12607
crossref_primary_10_1067_j_cpsurg_2018_02_003
crossref_primary_10_3390_diagnostics12030613
crossref_primary_10_12998_wjcc_v7_i4_452
crossref_primary_10_1111_jgh_16734
crossref_primary_10_1177_2050640617700014
crossref_primary_10_1007_s15036_019_0566_8
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gie_2017_08_023
crossref_primary_10_1136_flgastro_2016_100701
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gie_2024_04_2905
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0265209
crossref_primary_10_14309_ctg_0000000000000169
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gie_2016_06_039
crossref_primary_10_3748_wjg_v23_i48_8615
crossref_primary_10_14309_ajg_0000000000002931
crossref_primary_10_1155_2020_6457079
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_024_52244_8
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gie_2018_09_011
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11596_024_2882_2
crossref_primary_10_1080_10790268_2016_1258968
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11606_020_06464_z
crossref_primary_10_1002_jgh3_12816
crossref_primary_10_4253_wjge_v16_i1_18
crossref_primary_10_5646_ch_2025_31_e22
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0195709
crossref_primary_10_4081_acbr_2023_370
crossref_primary_10_1055_a_1214_6146
crossref_primary_10_1111_den_13860
crossref_primary_10_1111_den_14278
crossref_primary_10_14309_ajg_0000000000002407
crossref_primary_10_1053_j_gastro_2025_02_002
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_019_07100_6
crossref_primary_10_1080_00365521_2021_1879248
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gie_2016_09_013
crossref_primary_10_1111_den_13229
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10620_021_07037_8
crossref_primary_10_1097_MCG_0000000000001990
crossref_primary_10_1097_MOG_0000000000000494
crossref_primary_10_1097_MCG_0000000000001115
crossref_primary_10_3904_kjim_2019_040
crossref_primary_10_1097_MCG_0000000000001599
crossref_primary_10_1097_MCG_0000000000000931
crossref_primary_10_3390_diagnostics12051155
crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000018702
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12876_019_1019_8
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gie_2024_07_007
crossref_primary_10_1097_DCR_0000000000001305
crossref_primary_10_1111_jgh_14499
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00432_023_05493_5
crossref_primary_10_1111_jgh_15101
crossref_primary_10_1111_den_13330
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10620_022_07775_3
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gie_2018_08_021
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gie_2024_11_022
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11938_018_0165_3
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gie_2021_09_041
crossref_primary_10_1007_s41971_022_00137_w
crossref_primary_10_1053_j_gastro_2016_10_008
crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm12196332
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clinre_2021_101693
crossref_primary_10_14309_ajg_0000000000002880
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gie_2017_10_002
crossref_primary_10_1055_a_2565_8022
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0162051
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_medcle_2024_03_008
crossref_primary_10_1093_jcag_gwy027
crossref_primary_10_1080_17474124_2016_1245143
crossref_primary_10_1080_00365521_2021_1969683
crossref_primary_10_12998_wjcc_v9_i10_2238
crossref_primary_10_3389_fmed_2023_1296249
crossref_primary_10_1177_2050640617717157
crossref_primary_10_1038_ajg_2017_53
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11938_018_0176_0
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_dld_2019_06_026
crossref_primary_10_1097_MEG_0000000000002073
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10620_020_06321_3
crossref_primary_10_1053_j_gastro_2019_11_026
crossref_primary_10_14309_ajg_0000000000003287
crossref_primary_10_1055_a_1191_3011
crossref_primary_10_3748_wjg_v24_i26_2833
crossref_primary_10_15557_PiMR_2024_0059
crossref_primary_10_1055_a_2070_5561
crossref_primary_10_4251_wjgo_v16_i8_3393
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12876_020_01257_4
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright © 2016 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright © 2016 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.09.041
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic
MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod no_fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1528-0012
EndPage 405; quiz e14-5
ExternalDocumentID 26439436
Genre Video-Audio Media
Journal Article
Observational Study
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
GeographicLocations Connecticut
GeographicLocations_xml – name: Connecticut
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: NIDDK NIH HHS
  grantid: T32 DK007017
– fundername: NCI NIH HHS
  grantid: P30 CA016359
– fundername: NIDDK NIH HHS
  grantid: P30 DK034989
GroupedDBID ---
--K
.1-
.55
.FO
.GJ
0R~
1B1
1CY
1P~
1~5
3O-
4.4
457
4G.
53G
5GY
5RE
5VS
7-5
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAFWJ
AAIKJ
AALRI
AAQFI
AAQOH
AAQQT
AAQXK
AAXUO
ABCQX
ABDPE
ABJNI
ABLJU
ABMAC
ABOCM
ABWVN
ACRPL
ACVFH
ADBBV
ADCNI
ADMUD
ADNMO
AENEX
AEVXI
AFCTW
AFFNX
AFHKK
AFJKZ
AFRHN
AFTJW
AGCQF
AGHFR
AGQPQ
AI.
AITUG
AJUYK
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMRAJ
ASPBG
AVWKF
AZFZN
BELOY
BR6
C5W
CAG
CGR
COF
CS3
CUY
CVF
DU5
EBS
ECM
EFJIC
EFKBS
EIF
EJD
F5P
FD8
FDB
FEDTE
FGOYB
GBLVA
HVGLF
HZ~
IHE
J1W
J5H
K-O
KOM
L7B
M41
MO0
N4W
N9A
NPM
NQ-
O9-
OC.
OHT
ON0
P2P
PC.
QTD
R2-
RIG
ROL
RPZ
SEL
SES
SJN
SSZ
UDS
UGJ
UV1
VH1
WH7
X7M
XH2
Y6R
YQJ
Z5R
ZGI
ZXP
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c707t-9ea8917c7ca60d0e906808bfb63bf800db2d49a1ff795bdd260df7e60d1acb472
IEDL.DBID 7X8
ISICitedReferencesCount 159
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000368629900027&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
IngestDate Sat Sep 27 19:23:51 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 05:51:27 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 2
Keywords Colorectal Neoplasms
Endoscopy
Colon Cancer
Polyp
Language English
License Copyright © 2016 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c707t-9ea8917c7ca60d0e906808bfb63bf800db2d49a1ff795bdd260df7e60d1acb472
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-2
OpenAccessLink http://www.gastrojournal.org/article/S0016508515014274/pdf
PMID 26439436
PQID 1760911629
PQPubID 23479
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1760911629
pubmed_primary_26439436
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2016-02-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2016-02-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 02
  year: 2016
  text: 2016-02-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Gastroenterology (New York, N.Y. 1943)
PublicationTitleAlternate Gastroenterology
PublicationYear 2016
References 12838225 - Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 Jul;58(1):76-9
15044882 - Gastrointest Endosc. 2004 Apr;59(4):482-6
25480100 - Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Jan;81(1):31-53
8978338 - Gastroenterology. 1997 Jan;112(1):24-8
17714555 - Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 Dec;102(12):2680-5
22442161 - Gut. 2013 Feb;62(2):236-41
21907986 - Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Jan;75(1):98-106
19138760 - Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009 May;7(5):562-7; quiz 497
19240699 - Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Mar;104(3):739-50
22885884 - Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013 Jan;28(1):73-81
23410699 - Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Mar;77(3):464-71
19818779 - Gastroenterology. 2010 Jan;138(1):73-81
10968848 - Gastrointest Endosc. 2000 Sep;52(3):346-52
11358901 - Gut. 2001 Jun;48(6):812-5
20883845 - Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Oct;72(4):686-92
25135006 - Am J Gastroenterol. 2014 Nov;109(11):1714-23; quiz 1724
22763141 - Gastroenterology. 2012 Sep;143(3):844-57
16454841 - Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Feb;101(2):343-50
24496417 - Am J Gastroenterol. 2014 Feb;109(2):148-54
19136102 - Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Mar;69(3 Pt 2):620-5
21698368 - Dig Dis Sci. 2011 Sep;56(9):2623-30
23251889 - Clin Endosc. 2012 Nov;45(4):404-11
22138085 - Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Mar;75(3):545-53
15758907 - Gastrointest Endosc. 2005 Mar;61(3):378-84
19542818 - J Clin Gastroenterol. 2009 Jul;43(6):554-8
22885331 - Gastroenterology. 2012 Nov;143(5):1179-87.e1-3
22356322 - N Engl J Med. 2012 Feb 23;366(8):687-96
24629422 - Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Aug;80(2):269-76
18445096 - Am J Gastroenterol. 2008 May;103(5):1122-30
24047059 - N Engl J Med. 2013 Sep 19;369(12):1095-105
26713765 - Gastroenterology. 2016 Feb;150(2):303-6
25239068 - Gastroenterology. 2014 Oct;147(4):903-24
References_xml – reference: 23410699 - Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Mar;77(3):464-71
– reference: 21698368 - Dig Dis Sci. 2011 Sep;56(9):2623-30
– reference: 19542818 - J Clin Gastroenterol. 2009 Jul;43(6):554-8
– reference: 19138760 - Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009 May;7(5):562-7; quiz 497
– reference: 22763141 - Gastroenterology. 2012 Sep;143(3):844-57
– reference: 25239068 - Gastroenterology. 2014 Oct;147(4):903-24
– reference: 26713765 - Gastroenterology. 2016 Feb;150(2):303-6
– reference: 8978338 - Gastroenterology. 1997 Jan;112(1):24-8
– reference: 18445096 - Am J Gastroenterol. 2008 May;103(5):1122-30
– reference: 19818779 - Gastroenterology. 2010 Jan;138(1):73-81
– reference: 24047059 - N Engl J Med. 2013 Sep 19;369(12):1095-105
– reference: 23251889 - Clin Endosc. 2012 Nov;45(4):404-11
– reference: 19136102 - Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Mar;69(3 Pt 2):620-5
– reference: 21907986 - Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Jan;75(1):98-106
– reference: 22138085 - Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Mar;75(3):545-53
– reference: 20883845 - Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Oct;72(4):686-92
– reference: 11358901 - Gut. 2001 Jun;48(6):812-5
– reference: 15044882 - Gastrointest Endosc. 2004 Apr;59(4):482-6
– reference: 25135006 - Am J Gastroenterol. 2014 Nov;109(11):1714-23; quiz 1724
– reference: 19240699 - Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Mar;104(3):739-50
– reference: 22442161 - Gut. 2013 Feb;62(2):236-41
– reference: 22885331 - Gastroenterology. 2012 Nov;143(5):1179-87.e1-3
– reference: 25480100 - Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Jan;81(1):31-53
– reference: 24496417 - Am J Gastroenterol. 2014 Feb;109(2):148-54
– reference: 10968848 - Gastrointest Endosc. 2000 Sep;52(3):346-52
– reference: 17714555 - Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 Dec;102(12):2680-5
– reference: 22356322 - N Engl J Med. 2012 Feb 23;366(8):687-96
– reference: 22885884 - Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013 Jan;28(1):73-81
– reference: 24629422 - Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Aug;80(2):269-76
– reference: 16454841 - Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Feb;101(2):343-50
– reference: 15758907 - Gastrointest Endosc. 2005 Mar;61(3):378-84
– reference: 12838225 - Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 Jul;58(1):76-9
SSID ssj0009381
Score 2.558076
Snippet Bowel preparation is defined as adequate if it is sufficient for identification of polyps greater than 5 mm. However, adequate preparation has not been...
BACKGROUND & AIMSBowel preparation is defined as adequate if it is sufficient for identification of polyps greater than 5 mm. However, adequate preparation has...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage 396
SubjectTerms Adenomatous Polyps - pathology
Aged
Colon - pathology
Colonic Neoplasms - pathology
Colonic Polyps - pathology
Colonoscopy
Connecticut
Diagnostic Errors
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Observer Variation
Predictive Value of Tests
Prospective Studies
Reproducibility of Results
Therapeutic Irrigation - methods
Time Factors
Tumor Burden
Title Quantification of Adequate Bowel Preparation for Screening or Surveillance Colonoscopy in Men
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26439436
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1760911629
Volume 150
WOSCitedRecordID wos000368629900027&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1bS8MwFA7qRHzxfpk3Ivha1zZp0zzJHA5fNiYq7EVKmotMpN3adeK_96Tt2JMg-BIIoRBOTs_5knP5ELoJiU-okcoRPlOWwsx1uBHcsd4kCgIFoFxWZBNsOIzGYz5qHtyKJq1yaRMrQ60yad_IOx4LwbV5oc_vpjPHskbZ6GpDobGOWgSgjE3pYuNVt3AO7mhZLheQzsftuyjmuS3584Kquyn1fgeWlYPp7_53a3top4GWuFvrwj5a0-kB2ho0wfND9PZUijo1qDoNnBncVXpWAtrE99mX_sSjXNetwGEVwCx-ljYrB5wbtpMyX2jLUQRqgntgM9PMlrR840mKBzo9Qq_9h5feo9OwKziSuWzucC0iuKtJJkXoKlfzioUjMUlIEgMwUiW-olx4xjAeJErBxUcZpmH0hEwo84_RRpql-hRhJSUJiIwYk4oq300ogVmgtKcjQ0TYRtdLwcWgvTYkIVKdlUW8El0bndTSj6d1m43Yt2CJkvDsD1-fo2041Cad-gK1DPy7-hJtysV8UuRXlVrAOBwNfgB3BsVj
linkProvider ProQuest
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantification+of+Adequate+Bowel+Preparation+for+Screening+or+Surveillance+Colonoscopy+in+Men&rft.jtitle=Gastroenterology+%28New+York%2C+N.Y.+1943%29&rft.au=Clark%2C+Brian+T&rft.au=Protiva%2C+Petr&rft.au=Nagar%2C+Anil&rft.au=Imaeda%2C+Avlin&rft.date=2016-02-01&rft.eissn=1528-0012&rft.volume=150&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=396&rft_id=info:doi/10.1053%2Fj.gastro.2015.09.041&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F26439436&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F26439436&rft.externalDocID=26439436