Community consensus on core open science practices to monitor in biomedicine

The state of open science needs to be monitored to track changes over time and identify areas to create interventions to drive improvements. In order to monitor open science practices, they first need to be well defined and operationalized. To reach consensus on what open science practices to monito...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	PLoS biology Jg. 21; H. 1; S. e3001949
Hauptverfasser:	Cobey, Kelly D., Haustein, Stefanie, Brehaut, Jamie, Dirnagl, Ulrich, Franzen, Delwen L., Hemkens, Lars G., Presseau, Justin, Riedel, Nico, Strech, Daniel, Alperin, Juan Pablo, Costas, Rodrigo, Sena, Emily S., van Leeuwen, Thed, Ardern, Clare L., Bacellar, Isabel O. L., Camack, Nancy, Britto Correa, Marcos, Buccione, Roberto, Cenci, Maximiliano Sergio, Fergusson, Dean A., Gould van Praag, Cassandra, Hoffman, Michael M., Moraes Bielemann, Renata, Moschini, Ugo, Paschetta, Mauro, Pasquale, Valentina, Rac, Valeria E., Roskams-Edris, Dylan, Schatzl, Hermann M., Stratton, Jo Anne, Moher, David
Format:	Journal Article
Sprache:	Englisch
Veröffentlicht:	United States Public Library of Science 24.01.2023 Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Schlagworte:	Automation Biomedical Research Consensus Consensus View Coronaviruses COVID-19 Delphi Technique Development policy Funding Humans Medical research Medicine and Health Sciences Open access publishing Pandemics Performance management Public opinion Research and Analysis Methods Research Design Research facilities Research institutes Research institutions Scholarly communication Scholarly publishing Science Science Policy Surveys Surveys and Questionnaires United States
ISSN:	1545-7885, 1544-9173, 1545-7885
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Schreiben Sie den ersten Kommentar!