The effects of an evidence- and theory-informed feedback intervention on opioid prescribing for non-cancer pain in primary care: A controlled interrupted time series analysis
The rise in opioid prescribing in primary care represents a significant international public health challenge, associated with increased psychosocial problems, hospitalisations, and mortality. We evaluated the effects of a comparative feedback intervention with persuasive messaging and action planni...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | PLoS medicine Jg. 18; H. 10; S. e1003796 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
United States
Public Library of Science
04.10.2021
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| Schlagworte: | |
| ISSN: | 1549-1676, 1549-1277, 1549-1676 |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| Abstract | The rise in opioid prescribing in primary care represents a significant international public health challenge, associated with increased psychosocial problems, hospitalisations, and mortality. We evaluated the effects of a comparative feedback intervention with persuasive messaging and action planning on opioid prescribing in primary care.
A quasi-experimental controlled interrupted time series analysis used anonymised, aggregated practice data from electronic health records and prescribing data from publicly available sources. The study included 316 intervention and 130 control primary care practices in the Yorkshire and Humber region, UK, serving 2.2 million and 1 million residents, respectively. We observed the number of adult patients prescribed opioid medication by practice between July 2013 and December 2017. We excluded adults with coded cancer or drug dependency. The intervention, the Campaign to Reduce Opioid Prescribing (CROP), entailed bimonthly, comparative, and practice-individualised feedback reports to practices, with persuasive messaging and suggested actions over 1 year. Outcomes comprised the number of adults per 1,000 adults per month prescribed any opioid (main outcome), prescribed strong opioids, prescribed opioids in high-risk groups, prescribed other analgesics, and referred to musculoskeletal services. The number of adults prescribed any opioid rose pre-intervention in both intervention and control practices, by 0.18 (95% CI 0.11, 0.25) and 0.36 (95% CI 0.27, 0.46) per 1,000 adults per month, respectively. During the intervention period, prescribing per 1,000 adults fell in intervention practices (change -0.11; 95% CI -0.30, -0.08) and continued rising in control practices (change 0.54; 95% CI 0.29, 0.78), with a difference of -0.65 per 1,000 patients (95% CI -0.96, -0.34), corresponding to 15,000 fewer patients prescribed opioids. These trends continued post-intervention, although at slower rates. Prescribing of strong opioids, total opioid prescriptions, and prescribing in high-risk patient groups also generally fell. Prescribing of other analgesics fell whilst musculoskeletal referrals did not rise. Effects were attenuated after feedback ceased. Study limitations include being limited to 1 region in the UK, possible coding errors in routine data, being unable to fully account for concurrent interventions, and uncertainties over how general practices actually used the feedback reports and whether reductions in prescribing were always clinically appropriate.
Repeated comparative feedback offers a promising and relatively efficient population-level approach to reduce opioid prescribing in primary care, including prescribing of strong opioids and prescribing in high-risk patient groups. Such feedback may also prompt clinicians to reconsider prescribing other medicines associated with chronic pain, without causing a rise in referrals to musculoskeletal clinics. Feedback may need to be sustained for maximum effect. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Background
The rise in opioid prescribing in primary care represents a significant international public health challenge, associated with increased psychosocial problems, hospitalisations, and mortality. We evaluated the effects of a comparative feedback intervention with persuasive messaging and action planning on opioid prescribing in primary care.
Methods and findings
A quasi-experimental controlled interrupted time series analysis used anonymised, aggregated practice data from electronic health records and prescribing data from publicly available sources. The study included 316 intervention and 130 control primary care practices in the Yorkshire and Humber region, UK, serving 2.2 million and 1 million residents, respectively. We observed the number of adult patients prescribed opioid medication by practice between July 2013 and December 2017. We excluded adults with coded cancer or drug dependency. The intervention, the Campaign to Reduce Opioid Prescribing (CROP), entailed bimonthly, comparative, and practice-individualised feedback reports to practices, with persuasive messaging and suggested actions over 1 year. Outcomes comprised the number of adults per 1,000 adults per month prescribed any opioid (main outcome), prescribed strong opioids, prescribed opioids in high-risk groups, prescribed other analgesics, and referred to musculoskeletal services. The number of adults prescribed any opioid rose pre-intervention in both intervention and control practices, by 0.18 (95% CI 0.11, 0.25) and 0.36 (95% CI 0.27, 0.46) per 1,000 adults per month, respectively. During the intervention period, prescribing per 1,000 adults fell in intervention practices (change −0.11; 95% CI −0.30, −0.08) and continued rising in control practices (change 0.54; 95% CI 0.29, 0.78), with a difference of −0.65 per 1,000 patients (95% CI −0.96, −0.34), corresponding to 15,000 fewer patients prescribed opioids. These trends continued post-intervention, although at slower rates. Prescribing of strong opioids, total opioid prescriptions, and prescribing in high-risk patient groups also generally fell. Prescribing of other analgesics fell whilst musculoskeletal referrals did not rise. Effects were attenuated after feedback ceased. Study limitations include being limited to 1 region in the UK, possible coding errors in routine data, being unable to fully account for concurrent interventions, and uncertainties over how general practices actually used the feedback reports and whether reductions in prescribing were always clinically appropriate.
Conclusions
Repeated comparative feedback offers a promising and relatively efficient population-level approach to reduce opioid prescribing in primary care, including prescribing of strong opioids and prescribing in high-risk patient groups. Such feedback may also prompt clinicians to reconsider prescribing other medicines associated with chronic pain, without causing a rise in referrals to musculoskeletal clinics. Feedback may need to be sustained for maximum effect. The rise in opioid prescribing in primary care represents a significant international public health challenge, associated with increased psychosocial problems, hospitalisations, and mortality. We evaluated the effects of a comparative feedback intervention with persuasive messaging and action planning on opioid prescribing in primary care. A quasi-experimental controlled interrupted time series analysis used anonymised, aggregated practice data from electronic health records and prescribing data from publicly available sources. The study included 316 intervention and 130 control primary care practices in the Yorkshire and Humber region, UK, serving 2.2 million and 1 million residents, respectively. We observed the number of adult patients prescribed opioid medication by practice between July 2013 and December 2017. We excluded adults with coded cancer or drug dependency. The intervention, the Campaign to Reduce Opioid Prescribing (CROP), entailed bimonthly, comparative, and practice-individualised feedback reports to practices, with persuasive messaging and suggested actions over 1 year. Outcomes comprised the number of adults per 1,000 adults per month prescribed any opioid (main outcome), prescribed strong opioids, prescribed opioids in high-risk groups, prescribed other analgesics, and referred to musculoskeletal services. The number of adults prescribed any opioid rose pre-intervention in both intervention and control practices, by 0.18 (95% CI 0.11, 0.25) and 0.36 (95% CI 0.27, 0.46) per 1,000 adults per month, respectively. During the intervention period, prescribing per 1,000 adults fell in intervention practices (change -0.11; 95% CI -0.30, -0.08) and continued rising in control practices (change 0.54; 95% CI 0.29, 0.78), with a difference of -0.65 per 1,000 patients (95% CI -0.96, -0.34), corresponding to 15,000 fewer patients prescribed opioids. These trends continued post-intervention, although at slower rates. Prescribing of strong opioids, total opioid prescriptions, and prescribing in high-risk patient groups also generally fell. Prescribing of other analgesics fell whilst musculoskeletal referrals did not rise. Effects were attenuated after feedback ceased. Study limitations include being limited to 1 region in the UK, possible coding errors in routine data, being unable to fully account for concurrent interventions, and uncertainties over how general practices actually used the feedback reports and whether reductions in prescribing were always clinically appropriate. Repeated comparative feedback offers a promising and relatively efficient population-level approach to reduce opioid prescribing in primary care, including prescribing of strong opioids and prescribing in high-risk patient groups. Such feedback may also prompt clinicians to reconsider prescribing other medicines associated with chronic pain, without causing a rise in referrals to musculoskeletal clinics. Feedback may need to be sustained for maximum effect. Background The rise in opioid prescribing in primary care represents a significant international public health challenge, associated with increased psychosocial problems, hospitalisations, and mortality. We evaluated the effects of a comparative feedback intervention with persuasive messaging and action planning on opioid prescribing in primary care. Methods and findings A quasi-experimental controlled interrupted time series analysis used anonymised, aggregated practice data from electronic health records and prescribing data from publicly available sources. The study included 316 intervention and 130 control primary care practices in the Yorkshire and Humber region, UK, serving 2.2 million and 1 million residents, respectively. We observed the number of adult patients prescribed opioid medication by practice between July 2013 and December 2017. We excluded adults with coded cancer or drug dependency. The intervention, the Campaign to Reduce Opioid Prescribing (CROP), entailed bimonthly, comparative, and practice-individualised feedback reports to practices, with persuasive messaging and suggested actions over 1 year. Outcomes comprised the number of adults per 1,000 adults per month prescribed any opioid (main outcome), prescribed strong opioids, prescribed opioids in high-risk groups, prescribed other analgesics, and referred to musculoskeletal services. The number of adults prescribed any opioid rose pre-intervention in both intervention and control practices, by 0.18 (95% CI 0.11, 0.25) and 0.36 (95% CI 0.27, 0.46) per 1,000 adults per month, respectively. During the intervention period, prescribing per 1,000 adults fell in intervention practices (change −0.11; 95% CI −0.30, −0.08) and continued rising in control practices (change 0.54; 95% CI 0.29, 0.78), with a difference of −0.65 per 1,000 patients (95% CI −0.96, −0.34), corresponding to 15,000 fewer patients prescribed opioids. These trends continued post-intervention, although at slower rates. Prescribing of strong opioids, total opioid prescriptions, and prescribing in high-risk patient groups also generally fell. Prescribing of other analgesics fell whilst musculoskeletal referrals did not rise. Effects were attenuated after feedback ceased. Study limitations include being limited to 1 region in the UK, possible coding errors in routine data, being unable to fully account for concurrent interventions, and uncertainties over how general practices actually used the feedback reports and whether reductions in prescribing were always clinically appropriate. Conclusions Repeated comparative feedback offers a promising and relatively efficient population-level approach to reduce opioid prescribing in primary care, including prescribing of strong opioids and prescribing in high-risk patient groups. Such feedback may also prompt clinicians to reconsider prescribing other medicines associated with chronic pain, without causing a rise in referrals to musculoskeletal clinics. Feedback may need to be sustained for maximum effect. Background The rise in opioid prescribing in primary care represents a significant international public health challenge, associated with increased psychosocial problems, hospitalisations, and mortality. We evaluated the effects of a comparative feedback intervention with persuasive messaging and action planning on opioid prescribing in primary care. Methods and findings A quasi-experimental controlled interrupted time series analysis used anonymised, aggregated practice data from electronic health records and prescribing data from publicly available sources. The study included 316 intervention and 130 control primary care practices in the Yorkshire and Humber region, UK, serving 2.2 million and 1 million residents, respectively. We observed the number of adult patients prescribed opioid medication by practice between July 2013 and December 2017. We excluded adults with coded cancer or drug dependency. The intervention, the Campaign to Reduce Opioid Prescribing (CROP), entailed bimonthly, comparative, and practice-individualised feedback reports to practices, with persuasive messaging and suggested actions over 1 year. Outcomes comprised the number of adults per 1,000 adults per month prescribed any opioid (main outcome), prescribed strong opioids, prescribed opioids in high-risk groups, prescribed other analgesics, and referred to musculoskeletal services. The number of adults prescribed any opioid rose pre-intervention in both intervention and control practices, by 0.18 (95% CI 0.11, 0.25) and 0.36 (95% CI 0.27, 0.46) per 1,000 adults per month, respectively. During the intervention period, prescribing per 1,000 adults fell in intervention practices (change -0.11; 95% CI -0.30, -0.08) and continued rising in control practices (change 0.54; 95% CI 0.29, 0.78), with a difference of -0.65 per 1,000 patients (95% CI -0.96, -0.34), corresponding to 15,000 fewer patients prescribed opioids. These trends continued post-intervention, although at slower rates. Prescribing of strong opioids, total opioid prescriptions, and prescribing in high-risk patient groups also generally fell. Prescribing of other analgesics fell whilst musculoskeletal referrals did not rise. Effects were attenuated after feedback ceased. Study limitations include being limited to 1 region in the UK, possible coding errors in routine data, being unable to fully account for concurrent interventions, and uncertainties over how general practices actually used the feedback reports and whether reductions in prescribing were always clinically appropriate. Conclusions Repeated comparative feedback offers a promising and relatively efficient population-level approach to reduce opioid prescribing in primary care, including prescribing of strong opioids and prescribing in high-risk patient groups. Such feedback may also prompt clinicians to reconsider prescribing other medicines associated with chronic pain, without causing a rise in referrals to musculoskeletal clinics. Feedback may need to be sustained for maximum effect. The rise in opioid prescribing in primary care represents a significant international public health challenge, associated with increased psychosocial problems, hospitalisations, and mortality. We evaluated the effects of a comparative feedback intervention with persuasive messaging and action planning on opioid prescribing in primary care.BACKGROUNDThe rise in opioid prescribing in primary care represents a significant international public health challenge, associated with increased psychosocial problems, hospitalisations, and mortality. We evaluated the effects of a comparative feedback intervention with persuasive messaging and action planning on opioid prescribing in primary care.A quasi-experimental controlled interrupted time series analysis used anonymised, aggregated practice data from electronic health records and prescribing data from publicly available sources. The study included 316 intervention and 130 control primary care practices in the Yorkshire and Humber region, UK, serving 2.2 million and 1 million residents, respectively. We observed the number of adult patients prescribed opioid medication by practice between July 2013 and December 2017. We excluded adults with coded cancer or drug dependency. The intervention, the Campaign to Reduce Opioid Prescribing (CROP), entailed bimonthly, comparative, and practice-individualised feedback reports to practices, with persuasive messaging and suggested actions over 1 year. Outcomes comprised the number of adults per 1,000 adults per month prescribed any opioid (main outcome), prescribed strong opioids, prescribed opioids in high-risk groups, prescribed other analgesics, and referred to musculoskeletal services. The number of adults prescribed any opioid rose pre-intervention in both intervention and control practices, by 0.18 (95% CI 0.11, 0.25) and 0.36 (95% CI 0.27, 0.46) per 1,000 adults per month, respectively. During the intervention period, prescribing per 1,000 adults fell in intervention practices (change -0.11; 95% CI -0.30, -0.08) and continued rising in control practices (change 0.54; 95% CI 0.29, 0.78), with a difference of -0.65 per 1,000 patients (95% CI -0.96, -0.34), corresponding to 15,000 fewer patients prescribed opioids. These trends continued post-intervention, although at slower rates. Prescribing of strong opioids, total opioid prescriptions, and prescribing in high-risk patient groups also generally fell. Prescribing of other analgesics fell whilst musculoskeletal referrals did not rise. Effects were attenuated after feedback ceased. Study limitations include being limited to 1 region in the UK, possible coding errors in routine data, being unable to fully account for concurrent interventions, and uncertainties over how general practices actually used the feedback reports and whether reductions in prescribing were always clinically appropriate.METHODS AND FINDINGSA quasi-experimental controlled interrupted time series analysis used anonymised, aggregated practice data from electronic health records and prescribing data from publicly available sources. The study included 316 intervention and 130 control primary care practices in the Yorkshire and Humber region, UK, serving 2.2 million and 1 million residents, respectively. We observed the number of adult patients prescribed opioid medication by practice between July 2013 and December 2017. We excluded adults with coded cancer or drug dependency. The intervention, the Campaign to Reduce Opioid Prescribing (CROP), entailed bimonthly, comparative, and practice-individualised feedback reports to practices, with persuasive messaging and suggested actions over 1 year. Outcomes comprised the number of adults per 1,000 adults per month prescribed any opioid (main outcome), prescribed strong opioids, prescribed opioids in high-risk groups, prescribed other analgesics, and referred to musculoskeletal services. The number of adults prescribed any opioid rose pre-intervention in both intervention and control practices, by 0.18 (95% CI 0.11, 0.25) and 0.36 (95% CI 0.27, 0.46) per 1,000 adults per month, respectively. During the intervention period, prescribing per 1,000 adults fell in intervention practices (change -0.11; 95% CI -0.30, -0.08) and continued rising in control practices (change 0.54; 95% CI 0.29, 0.78), with a difference of -0.65 per 1,000 patients (95% CI -0.96, -0.34), corresponding to 15,000 fewer patients prescribed opioids. These trends continued post-intervention, although at slower rates. Prescribing of strong opioids, total opioid prescriptions, and prescribing in high-risk patient groups also generally fell. Prescribing of other analgesics fell whilst musculoskeletal referrals did not rise. Effects were attenuated after feedback ceased. Study limitations include being limited to 1 region in the UK, possible coding errors in routine data, being unable to fully account for concurrent interventions, and uncertainties over how general practices actually used the feedback reports and whether reductions in prescribing were always clinically appropriate.Repeated comparative feedback offers a promising and relatively efficient population-level approach to reduce opioid prescribing in primary care, including prescribing of strong opioids and prescribing in high-risk patient groups. Such feedback may also prompt clinicians to reconsider prescribing other medicines associated with chronic pain, without causing a rise in referrals to musculoskeletal clinics. Feedback may need to be sustained for maximum effect.CONCLUSIONSRepeated comparative feedback offers a promising and relatively efficient population-level approach to reduce opioid prescribing in primary care, including prescribing of strong opioids and prescribing in high-risk patient groups. Such feedback may also prompt clinicians to reconsider prescribing other medicines associated with chronic pain, without causing a rise in referrals to musculoskeletal clinics. Feedback may need to be sustained for maximum effect. Using a controlled interrupted time series analysis, Sarah L. Alderson and colleagues examine the association between an evidence and theory-informed feedback intervention and opioid prescribing for non-cancer pain in primary care in UK. BackgroundThe rise in opioid prescribing in primary care represents a significant international public health challenge, associated with increased psychosocial problems, hospitalisations, and mortality. We evaluated the effects of a comparative feedback intervention with persuasive messaging and action planning on opioid prescribing in primary care.Methods and findingsA quasi-experimental controlled interrupted time series analysis used anonymised, aggregated practice data from electronic health records and prescribing data from publicly available sources. The study included 316 intervention and 130 control primary care practices in the Yorkshire and Humber region, UK, serving 2.2 million and 1 million residents, respectively. We observed the number of adult patients prescribed opioid medication by practice between July 2013 and December 2017. We excluded adults with coded cancer or drug dependency. The intervention, the Campaign to Reduce Opioid Prescribing (CROP), entailed bimonthly, comparative, and practice-individualised feedback reports to practices, with persuasive messaging and suggested actions over 1 year. Outcomes comprised the number of adults per 1,000 adults per month prescribed any opioid (main outcome), prescribed strong opioids, prescribed opioids in high-risk groups, prescribed other analgesics, and referred to musculoskeletal services. The number of adults prescribed any opioid rose pre-intervention in both intervention and control practices, by 0.18 (95% CI 0.11, 0.25) and 0.36 (95% CI 0.27, 0.46) per 1,000 adults per month, respectively. During the intervention period, prescribing per 1,000 adults fell in intervention practices (change -0.11; 95% CI -0.30, -0.08) and continued rising in control practices (change 0.54; 95% CI 0.29, 0.78), with a difference of -0.65 per 1,000 patients (95% CI -0.96, -0.34), corresponding to 15,000 fewer patients prescribed opioids. These trends continued post-intervention, although at slower rates. Prescribing of strong opioids, total opioid prescriptions, and prescribing in high-risk patient groups also generally fell. Prescribing of other analgesics fell whilst musculoskeletal referrals did not rise. Effects were attenuated after feedback ceased. Study limitations include being limited to 1 region in the UK, possible coding errors in routine data, being unable to fully account for concurrent interventions, and uncertainties over how general practices actually used the feedback reports and whether reductions in prescribing were always clinically appropriate.ConclusionsRepeated comparative feedback offers a promising and relatively efficient population-level approach to reduce opioid prescribing in primary care, including prescribing of strong opioids and prescribing in high-risk patient groups. Such feedback may also prompt clinicians to reconsider prescribing other medicines associated with chronic pain, without causing a rise in referrals to musculoskeletal clinics. Feedback may need to be sustained for maximum effect. The rise in opioid prescribing in primary care represents a significant international public health challenge, associated with increased psychosocial problems, hospitalisations, and mortality. We evaluated the effects of a comparative feedback intervention with persuasive messaging and action planning on opioid prescribing in primary care. A quasi-experimental controlled interrupted time series analysis used anonymised, aggregated practice data from electronic health records and prescribing data from publicly available sources. The study included 316 intervention and 130 control primary care practices in the Yorkshire and Humber region, UK, serving 2.2 million and 1 million residents, respectively. We observed the number of adult patients prescribed opioid medication by practice between July 2013 and December 2017. We excluded adults with coded cancer or drug dependency. The intervention, the Campaign to Reduce Opioid Prescribing (CROP), entailed bimonthly, comparative, and practice-individualised feedback reports to practices, with persuasive messaging and suggested actions over 1 year. Outcomes comprised the number of adults per 1,000 adults per month prescribed any opioid (main outcome), prescribed strong opioids, prescribed opioids in high-risk groups, prescribed other analgesics, and referred to musculoskeletal services. The number of adults prescribed any opioid rose pre-intervention in both intervention and control practices, by 0.18 (95% CI 0.11, 0.25) and 0.36 (95% CI 0.27, 0.46) per 1,000 adults per month, respectively. During the intervention period, prescribing per 1,000 adults fell in intervention practices (change -0.11; 95% CI -0.30, -0.08) and continued rising in control practices (change 0.54; 95% CI 0.29, 0.78), with a difference of -0.65 per 1,000 patients (95% CI -0.96, -0.34), corresponding to 15,000 fewer patients prescribed opioids. These trends continued post-intervention, although at slower rates. Prescribing of strong opioids, total opioid prescriptions, and prescribing in high-risk patient groups also generally fell. Prescribing of other analgesics fell whilst musculoskeletal referrals did not rise. Effects were attenuated after feedback ceased. Study limitations include being limited to 1 region in the UK, possible coding errors in routine data, being unable to fully account for concurrent interventions, and uncertainties over how general practices actually used the feedback reports and whether reductions in prescribing were always clinically appropriate. Repeated comparative feedback offers a promising and relatively efficient population-level approach to reduce opioid prescribing in primary care, including prescribing of strong opioids and prescribing in high-risk patient groups. Such feedback may also prompt clinicians to reconsider prescribing other medicines associated with chronic pain, without causing a rise in referrals to musculoskeletal clinics. Feedback may need to be sustained for maximum effect. |
| Audience | Academic |
| Author | Foy, Robbie Carder, Paul Alderson, Sarah L. Johnson, Stella Farragher, Tracey M. Willis, Thomas A. |
| AuthorAffiliation | 3 West Yorkshire Research and Development, National Health Service Bradford Districts Clinical Commissioning Group, Bradford, United Kingdom 2 Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom 1 Leeds Institute of Health Science, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom Massachusetts General Hospital, UNITED STATES |
| AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: 1 Leeds Institute of Health Science, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom – name: 2 Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom – name: Massachusetts General Hospital, UNITED STATES – name: 3 West Yorkshire Research and Development, National Health Service Bradford Districts Clinical Commissioning Group, Bradford, United Kingdom |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Sarah L. orcidid: 0000-0002-5418-0495 surname: Alderson fullname: Alderson, Sarah L. – sequence: 2 givenname: Tracey M. orcidid: 0000-0002-1968-6378 surname: Farragher fullname: Farragher, Tracey M. – sequence: 3 givenname: Thomas A. orcidid: 0000-0002-0252-9923 surname: Willis fullname: Willis, Thomas A. – sequence: 4 givenname: Paul orcidid: 0000-0002-7940-6016 surname: Carder fullname: Carder, Paul – sequence: 5 givenname: Stella orcidid: 0000-0002-2832-052X surname: Johnson fullname: Johnson, Stella – sequence: 6 givenname: Robbie surname: Foy fullname: Foy, Robbie |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34606504$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNqVk21r1TAUx4tMnJt-A9GAIPqi16RN02YvhDF8GAwHOn0b0vTk3sze5Jq0w30pP6On293YHRdRWmiS_s7_POXsZTs-eMiyZ4zOWFmzt-dhjF73s9USuhmjtKyleJA9ZhWXORO12Lmz3s32UjqntJBU0kfZbskFFRXlj7PfZwsgYC2YIZFgifYELlwH3kCOm44MCwjxMnfehoieiAXoWm1-EOcHiBfgBxc8md6VC64jqwjJRNc6PydoQjDq3GiUi2SlnUczRNxSx0tidIQDckhM8EMMfY_qV6JxXA24HtwSSILoIGEkur9MLj3JHlrdJ3i6_u5n3z68Pzv6lJ-cfjw-OjzJjZB8yOtCUMlabTHdwnY1VFSYUre0KgoobWuobdtKdpzzpmB1UTFtJJawNVwIbWW5n7241l31Ial1qZMqKtlgqRteIHF8TXRBn6t1Sipop64OQpwrHQdnelC1pS21TJa8bTiGJkEIqFhZaSwlrVrUerf2NrZYY4NFjbrfEN38491CzcOFangjMXoUeL0WiOHnCGlQS5cM9L32EMYp7lqWdSOu0Jf30O3Zram5xgSm5qNfM4mqQ9GwouYNE0jlW6g5eMAg8bZah8cb_GwLj08HS2e2GrzZMJhuCvwa5npMSR1__fIf7Od_Z0-_b7Kv7rAL0P2wSKEfp3ufNsHnd7t4276bYUOAXwMmhpQi2FuEUTXN9E0r1DTTaj3TaHZwz8y4QU_usXqu_7vxH8cwUzI |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1177_0272989X241270001 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2022_066158 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_drugalcdep_2022_109376 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12916_023_03213_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cct_2023_107354 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjoq_2025_003455 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2022_062902 crossref_primary_10_1177_03000605241272733 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0280958 crossref_primary_10_1093_fampra_cmaf062 crossref_primary_10_1001_jamanetworkopen_2024_38325 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_amjmed_2024_09_017 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjqs_2023_016239 crossref_primary_10_1001_jamanetworkopen_2024_38335 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjqs_2022_015716 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12875_023_02040_6 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12916_023_02949_w |
| Cites_doi | 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003270 10.7326/M15-2248 10.1136/bmj.i4079 10.1056/NEJMsa055505 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010276 10.1002/jrsm.1435 10.1007/s11606-018-4710-5 10.1046/j.1365-2710.2002.00430.x 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2010.00883.x 10.1186/s13012-019-0883-5 10.1002/pds.4320 10.1002/j.1532-2149.2014.496.x 10.1111/bcp.13556 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.0665 10.1136/bmj.k2833 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00161-6 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005178 10.1001/jama.2018.0899 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019921 10.1111/1468-0009.00206 10.1016/S2468-2667(19)30128-8 10.1371/journal.pone.0221153 10.1186/s12875-019-0947-2 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.2468 10.1001/jama.2016.7789 10.1503/cmaj.171286 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.10.003 10.1001/jama.2016.1464 10.1136/bmj.l6968 10.1186/s12874-019-0777-x 10.1186/s13012-017-0704-7 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008355 10.1093/ije/dyy135 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003045 10.1016/j.pain.2014.03.009 10.1056/NEJMra025411 10.1016/S2468-2667(19)30156-2 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00215-4 10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30471-1 10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.01.025 10.3399/bjgp18X695057 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | COPYRIGHT 2021 Public Library of Science 2021 Alderson et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. 2021 Alderson et al 2021 Alderson et al |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: COPYRIGHT 2021 Public Library of Science – notice: 2021 Alderson et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. – notice: 2021 Alderson et al 2021 Alderson et al |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM IOV ISN ISR 3V. 7TK 7X7 7XB 88E 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA AZQEC BENPR CCPQU DWQXO FYUFA GHDGH K9. M0S M1P PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI 7X8 5PM DOA CZK |
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003796 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints Gale In Context: Canada Gale In Context: Science ProQuest Central (Corporate) Neurosciences Abstracts Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Hospital Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central ProQuest One ProQuest Central Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Collection Medical Database ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic (retired) ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) Directory of Open Access Journals PLoS Medicine |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest Central ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection Health Research Premium Collection Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) Neurosciences Abstracts ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | Publicly Available Content Database MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: PIMPY name: ProQuest Publicly Available Content Database url: http://search.proquest.com/publiccontent sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Medicine Public Health |
| DocumentTitleAlternate | Feedback intervention to reduce opioid prescribing in primary care |
| EISSN | 1549-1676 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 2598100842 oai_doaj_org_article_7f0b0f1934b847269e66e5135aedb05b PMC8489725 A681274816 34606504 10_1371_journal_pmed_1003796 |
| Genre | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article |
| GeographicLocations | United Kingdom United Kingdom--UK North America |
| GeographicLocations_xml | – name: United Kingdom – name: United Kingdom--UK – name: North America |
| GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: Wellcome Trust – fundername: Medical Research Council – fundername: British Heart Foundation – fundername: Arthritis Research UK – fundername: ; grantid: SGL017/1033 |
| GroupedDBID | --- 123 29O 2WC 53G 5VS 7X7 88E 8FI 8FJ AAFWJ AAUCC AAWOE AAWTL AAYXX ABDBF ABUWG ACCTH ACGFO ACIHN ACPRK ACUHS ADBBV AEAQA AENEX AFFHD AFKRA AFPKN AFRAH AFXKF AHMBA AKRSQ ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AOIJS B0M BAIFH BAWUL BBTPI BCNDV BENPR BPHCQ BVXVI BWKFM CCPQU CITATION CS3 DIK DU5 E3Z EAP EAS EBD EBS EJD EMK EMOBN ESX F5P FPL FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HMCUK HYE IAO IHR IHW INH INR IOF IOV IPO ISN ISR ITC KQ8 M1P M48 MK0 O5R O5S OK1 OVT P2P PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PPXIY PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO PV9 RNS RPM RZL SV3 TR2 TUS UKHRP WOW XSB YZZ ~8M 3V. ADRAZ ALIPV BCGST CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF H13 ICW IPNFZ M~E NPM PKN RIG WOQ 7TK 7XB 8FK AZQEC DWQXO K9. PKEHL PQEST PQUKI 7X8 5PM - AAPBV ABPTK ADACO BBAFP CZK PRINS |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c694t-726091baf0902fd7e506c3ab0522e3fbc0fbb59d4448217251ac9003bc466af93 |
| IEDL.DBID | FPL |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 18 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000703370200001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 1549-1676 1549-1277 |
| IngestDate | Sun Dec 05 00:11:24 EST 2021 Fri Oct 03 12:44:26 EDT 2025 Tue Nov 04 01:56:05 EST 2025 Sun Nov 09 12:19:40 EST 2025 Sat Nov 29 14:22:23 EST 2025 Tue Nov 11 10:19:41 EST 2025 Sat Nov 29 11:40:07 EST 2025 Tue Nov 04 17:31:46 EST 2025 Thu Nov 13 15:53:28 EST 2025 Thu Nov 13 14:57:47 EST 2025 Thu Nov 13 14:23:06 EST 2025 Thu May 22 21:26:08 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 19 02:27:47 EST 2025 Sat Nov 29 06:34:11 EST 2025 Tue Nov 18 21:15:41 EST 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 10 |
| Language | English |
| License | This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Creative Commons Attribution License |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c694t-726091baf0902fd7e506c3ab0522e3fbc0fbb59d4448217251ac9003bc466af93 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-0252-9923 0000-0002-5418-0495 0000-0002-2832-052X 0000-0002-7940-6016 0000-0002-1968-6378 |
| OpenAccessLink | http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003796 |
| PMID | 34606504 |
| PQID | 2598100842 |
| PQPubID | 1436338 |
| ParticipantIDs | plos_journals_2598100842 doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_7f0b0f1934b847269e66e5135aedb05b pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8489725 proquest_miscellaneous_2579378625 proquest_journals_2598100842 gale_infotracmisc_A681274816 gale_infotracgeneralonefile_A681274816 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A681274816 gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A681274816 gale_incontextgauss_ISN_A681274816 gale_incontextgauss_IOV_A681274816 gale_healthsolutions_A681274816 pubmed_primary_34606504 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pmed_1003796 crossref_citationtrail_10_1371_journal_pmed_1003796 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 20211004 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2021-10-04 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 10 year: 2021 text: 20211004 day: 4 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | United States |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States – name: San Francisco – name: San Francisco, CA USA |
| PublicationTitle | PLoS medicine |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | PLoS Med |
| PublicationYear | 2021 |
| Publisher | Public Library of Science Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Public Library of Science – name: Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| References | JM Liebschutz (pmed.1003796.ref020) 2017; 177 L Mordecai (pmed.1003796.ref048) 2018; 68 J Gornall (pmed.1003796.ref049) 2017 pmed.1003796.ref050 M Jani (pmed.1003796.ref012) 2020; 17 R Daoust (pmed.1003796.ref039) 2018; 190 B Brown (pmed.1003796.ref046) 2019; 14 B Rosner (pmed.1003796.ref005) 2019; 14 HJ Curtis (pmed.1003796.ref015) 2019; 6 HJ Curtis (pmed.1003796.ref043) 2018; 8 JG Katzman (pmed.1003796.ref019) 2019; 34 CS Zin (pmed.1003796.ref017) 2014; 18 T-C Chen (pmed.1003796.ref042) 2018; 27 EE Krebs (pmed.1003796.ref011) 2018; 319 AK Wagner (pmed.1003796.ref027) 2002; 27 D Dowell (pmed.1003796.ref010) 2016; 315 L Desveaux (pmed.1003796.ref047) 2019; 20 MV Kiang (pmed.1003796.ref001) 2020; 368 M Hallsworth (pmed.1003796.ref044) 2016; 387 Department for Communities and Local Government (pmed.1003796.ref024) 2011 S Berterame (pmed.1003796.ref008) 2016; 387 L Glidewell (pmed.1003796.ref028) 2018; 13 R Foy (pmed.1003796.ref016) 2016; 6 C Eccleston (pmed.1003796.ref018) 2017; 11 WR Shadish (pmed.1003796.ref025) 2002 LZ Schieber (pmed.1003796.ref013) 2019; 2 A Fretheim (pmed.1003796.ref026) 2015; 68 K McLintock (pmed.1003796.ref031) 2014; 4 JH Samet (pmed.1003796.ref021) 2020 pmed.1003796.ref032 pmed.1003796.ref033 SL Turner (pmed.1003796.ref037) 2021; 12 KMC Verhamme (pmed.1003796.ref014) 2019; 4 OMS Fredheim (pmed.1003796.ref003) 2014; 155 TA Willis (pmed.1003796.ref029) 2020; 17 WA Ray (pmed.1003796.ref009) 2016; 315 EB Ferlie (pmed.1003796.ref051) 2001; 79 M Tadrous (pmed.1003796.ref041) 2019; 66 J Grimshaw (pmed.1003796.ref052) 2019; 28 JC Ballantyne (pmed.1003796.ref007) 2003; 349 JC Brehaut (pmed.1003796.ref030) 2016; 164 J Lopez Bernal (pmed.1003796.ref035) 2018; 47 GA Kalkman (pmed.1003796.ref002) 2019; 4 N Ivers (pmed.1003796.ref022) 2012; 6 S Lalic (pmed.1003796.ref004) 2018; 84 pmed.1003796.ref023 MC Reid (pmed.1003796.ref038) 2010; 11 T Doran (pmed.1003796.ref034) 2006; 355 J Hudson (pmed.1003796.ref036) 2019; 19 EJ Chapman (pmed.1003796.ref040); 34 B Guthrie (pmed.1003796.ref045) 2016; 354 MM Jeffery (pmed.1003796.ref006) 2018; 362 |
| References_xml | – volume: 6: start-page: CD000259 year: 2012 ident: pmed.1003796.ref022 article-title: Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes publication-title: Cochrane Database Syst Rev – year: 2020 ident: pmed.1003796.ref021 article-title: Improving the delivery of chronic opioid therapy among people living with human immunodeficiency virus: a cluster randomized clinical trial publication-title: Clin Infect Dis – volume: 17 start-page: e1003270 issue: 10 year: 2020 ident: pmed.1003796.ref012 article-title: Time trends and prescribing patterns of opioid drugs in UK primary care patients with non-cancer pain: a retrospective cohort study publication-title: PLoS Med doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003270 – volume: 164 start-page: 435 issue: 6 year: 2016 ident: pmed.1003796.ref030 article-title: Practice feedback interventions: 15 suggestions for optimizing effectiveness publication-title: Ann Intern Med doi: 10.7326/M15-2248 – volume: 354 start-page: i4079 year: 2016 ident: pmed.1003796.ref045 article-title: Data feedback and behavioural change intervention to improve primary care prescribing safety (EFIPPS): multicentre, three arm, cluster randomised controlled trial publication-title: BMJ doi: 10.1136/bmj.i4079 – ident: pmed.1003796.ref032 – volume: 355 start-page: 375 issue: 4 year: 2006 ident: pmed.1003796.ref034 article-title: Pay-for-performance programs in family practices in the United Kingdom publication-title: N Engl J Med doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa055505 – volume: 6 start-page: e010276 issue: 5 year: 2016 ident: pmed.1003796.ref016 article-title: Prescribed opioids in primary care: cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses of influence of patient and practice characteristics publication-title: BMJ Open doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010276 – volume: 12 start-page: 106 issue: 1 year: 2021 ident: pmed.1003796.ref037 article-title: Creating effective interrupted time series graphs: review and recommendations publication-title: Res Synth Methods doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1435 – volume-title: The English indices of deprivation 2010: statistical release year: 2011 ident: pmed.1003796.ref024 – ident: pmed.1003796.ref023 – volume: 34 start-page: 387 issue: 3 year: 2019 ident: pmed.1003796.ref019 article-title: Army and navy ECHO pain telementoring improves clinician opioid prescribing for military patients: an observational cohort study publication-title: J Gen Intern Med doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4710-5 – volume: 27 start-page: 299 issue: 4 year: 2002 ident: pmed.1003796.ref027 article-title: Segmented regression analysis of interrupted time series studies in medication use research publication-title: J Clin Pharm Ther doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2710.2002.00430.x – volume: 11 start-page: 1063 issue: 7 year: 2010 ident: pmed.1003796.ref038 article-title: Characteristics of older adults receiving opioids in primary care: treatment duration and outcomes publication-title: Pain Med doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2010.00883.x – volume: 14 start-page: 40 issue: 1 year: 2019 ident: pmed.1003796.ref046 article-title: Clinical Performance Feedback Intervention Theory (CP-FIT): a new theory for designing, implementing, and evaluating feedback in health care based on a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative research publication-title: Implement Sci. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0883-5 – volume: 27 start-page: 487 year: 2018 ident: pmed.1003796.ref042 article-title: A 15-year overview of increasing tramadol utilisation and associated mortality and the impact of tramadol classification in the United Kingdom publication-title: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf doi: 10.1002/pds.4320 – volume: 18 start-page: 1343 issue: 9 year: 2014 ident: pmed.1003796.ref017 article-title: Changes in trends and pattern of strong opioid prescribing in primary care publication-title: Eur J Pain doi: 10.1002/j.1532-2149.2014.496.x – volume: 84 start-page: 1267 issue: 6 year: 2018 ident: pmed.1003796.ref004 article-title: Predictors of persistent prescription opioid analgesic use among people without cancer in Australia publication-title: Br J Clin Pharmacol doi: 10.1111/bcp.13556 – volume: 2 start-page: e190665 issue: 3 year: 2019 ident: pmed.1003796.ref013 article-title: Trends and patterns of geographic variation in opioid prescribing practices by state, United States, 2006–2017 publication-title: JAMA Netw Open doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.0665 – year: 2017 ident: pmed.1003796.ref049 article-title: Exposed: national disgrace as a quarter of a million patients are turned into drug addicts by their doctors publication-title: The Daily Mail. – volume: 362 start-page: k2833 year: 2018 ident: pmed.1003796.ref006 article-title: Trends in opioid use in commercially insured and Medicare Advantage populations in 2007–16: retrospective cohort study publication-title: BMJ doi: 10.1136/bmj.k2833 – volume: 387 start-page: 1644 issue: 10028 year: 2016 ident: pmed.1003796.ref008 article-title: Use of and barriers to access to opioid analgesics: a worldwide, regional, and national study publication-title: Lancet doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00161-6 – volume: 4 start-page: e005178 issue: 8 year: 2014 ident: pmed.1003796.ref031 article-title: The effects of financial incentives for case finding for depression in patients with diabetes and coronary heart disease: interrupted time series analysis publication-title: BMJ Open doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005178 – volume: 319 start-page: 872 issue: 9 year: 2018 ident: pmed.1003796.ref011 article-title: Effect of opioid vs nonopioid medications on pain-related function in patients with chronic back pain or hip or knee osteoarthritis pain: the space randomized clinical trial publication-title: JAMA doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.0899 – volume: 8 start-page: e019921 issue: 2 year: 2018 ident: pmed.1003796.ref043 article-title: OpenPrescribing: normalised data and software tool to research trends in English NHS primary care prescribing 1998–2016 publication-title: BMJ Open doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019921 – volume: 79 start-page: 281 issue: 2 year: 2001 ident: pmed.1003796.ref051 article-title: Improving the quality of health care in the United Kingdom and the United States: a framework for change publication-title: Milbank Q doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.00206 – volume: 4 start-page: E498 issue: 10 year: 2019 ident: pmed.1003796.ref002 article-title: Trends in use and misuse of opioids in the Netherlands: a retrospective, multi-source database study publication-title: Lancet Public Health doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(19)30128-8 – volume: 14 start-page: e0221153 issue: 8 year: 2019 ident: pmed.1003796.ref005 article-title: Opioid prescription patterns in Germany and the global opioid epidemic: systematic review of available evidence publication-title: PLoS ONE doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221153 – volume: 20 start-page: 59 issue: 1 year: 2019 ident: pmed.1003796.ref047 article-title: Understanding the behavioural determinants of opioid prescribing among family physicians: a qualitative study publication-title: BMC Fam Pract doi: 10.1186/s12875-019-0947-2 – volume-title: Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference year: 2002 ident: pmed.1003796.ref025 – volume: 177 start-page: 1265 issue: 9 year: 2017 ident: pmed.1003796.ref020 article-title: Improving adherence to long-term opioid therapy guidelines to reduce opioid misuse in primary care: a cluster-randomized clinical trial publication-title: JAMA Intern Med doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.2468 – volume: 315 start-page: 2415 issue: 22 year: 2016 ident: pmed.1003796.ref009 article-title: Prescription of long-acting opioids and mortality in patients with chronic noncancer pain publication-title: JAMA doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.7789 – volume: 190 start-page: E500 issue: 16 year: 2018 ident: pmed.1003796.ref039 article-title: Recent opioid use and fall-related injury among older patients with trauma publication-title: CMAJ doi: 10.1503/cmaj.171286 – volume: 68 start-page: 324 issue: 3 year: 2015 ident: pmed.1003796.ref026 article-title: A reanalysis of cluster randomized trials showed interrupted time-series studies were valuable in health system evaluation publication-title: J Clin Epidemiol doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.10.003 – ident: pmed.1003796.ref050 – volume: 34 start-page: 444 issue: 4 ident: pmed.1003796.ref040 article-title: Practice review: evidence-based and effective management of pain in patients with advanced cancer publication-title: Palliat Med. 2020 – volume: 315 start-page: 1624 issue: 15 year: 2016 ident: pmed.1003796.ref010 article-title: CDC guideline for prescribing opioids for chronic pain—United States, 2016 publication-title: JAMA doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.1464 – volume: 368 start-page: l6968 year: 2020 ident: pmed.1003796.ref001 article-title: Opioid prescribing patterns among medical providers in the United States, 2003–17: retrospective, observational study publication-title: BMJ doi: 10.1136/bmj.l6968 – volume: 19 start-page: 137 issue: 1 year: 2019 ident: pmed.1003796.ref036 article-title: Methodology and reporting characteristics of studies using interrupted time series design in healthcare publication-title: BMC Med Res Methodol doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0777-x – volume: 11 start-page: CD010323 issue: 11 year: 2017 ident: pmed.1003796.ref018 article-title: Interventions for the reduction of prescribed opioid use in chronic non-cancer pain publication-title: Cochrane Database Syst Rev – volume: 13 start-page: 32 issue: 1 year: 2018 ident: pmed.1003796.ref028 article-title: To what extent can behaviour change techniques be identified within an adaptable implementation package for primary care? A prospective directed content analysis. publication-title: Implement Sci doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0704-7 – volume: 28 start-page: 416 issue: 5 year: 2019 ident: pmed.1003796.ref052 article-title: Reinvigorating stagnant science: implementation laboratories and a meta-laboratory to efficiently advance the science of audit and feedback publication-title: BMJ Qual Saf doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008355 – volume: 47 start-page: 2082 issue: 6 year: 2018 ident: pmed.1003796.ref035 article-title: The use of controls in interrupted time series studies of public health interventions publication-title: Int J Epidemiol doi: 10.1093/ije/dyy135 – ident: pmed.1003796.ref033 – volume: 17 start-page: e1003045 issue: 2 year: 2020 ident: pmed.1003796.ref029 article-title: An adaptable implementation package targeting evidence-based indicators in primary care: a pragmatic cluster-randomised evaluation publication-title: PLoS Med. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003045 – volume: 155 start-page: 1213 issue: 7 year: 2014 ident: pmed.1003796.ref003 article-title: Chronic pain and use of opioids: a population-based pharmacoepidemiological study from the Norwegian Prescription Database and the Nord-Trøndelag Health Study publication-title: Pain doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2014.03.009 – volume: 349 start-page: 1943 issue: 20 year: 2003 ident: pmed.1003796.ref007 article-title: Opioid therapy for chronic pain publication-title: N Engl J Med doi: 10.1056/NEJMra025411 – volume: 4 start-page: e483 issue: 10 year: 2019 ident: pmed.1003796.ref014 article-title: Are we facing an opioid crisis in Europe publication-title: Lancet Public Health doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(19)30156-2 – volume: 387 start-page: P1743 issue: 10029 year: 2016 ident: pmed.1003796.ref044 article-title: Provision of social norm feedback to high prescribers of antibiotics in general practice: a pragmatic national randomised controlled trial publication-title: Lancet doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00215-4 – volume: 6 start-page: 140 issue: 2 year: 2019 ident: pmed.1003796.ref015 article-title: Opioid prescribing trends and geographical variation in England, 1998–2018: a retrospective database study publication-title: Lancet Psychiatry doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30471-1 – volume: 66 start-page: 82 year: 2019 ident: pmed.1003796.ref041 article-title: Evaluation of the fentanyl patch-for-patch program in Ontario, Canada publication-title: Int J Drug Policy doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.01.025 – volume: 68 start-page: e225 issue: 668 year: 2018 ident: pmed.1003796.ref048 article-title: Patterns of regional variation of opioid prescribing in primary care in England: a retrospective observational study publication-title: Br J Gen Pract doi: 10.3399/bjgp18X695057 |
| SSID | ssj0029090 |
| Score | 2.457828 |
| Snippet | The rise in opioid prescribing in primary care represents a significant international public health challenge, associated with increased psychosocial problems,... Background The rise in opioid prescribing in primary care represents a significant international public health challenge, associated with increased... Using a controlled interrupted time series analysis, Sarah L. Alderson and colleagues examine the association between an evidence and theory-informed feedback... BackgroundThe rise in opioid prescribing in primary care represents a significant international public health challenge, associated with increased psychosocial... Background The rise in opioid prescribing in primary care represents a significant international public health challenge, associated with increased... |
| SourceID | plos doaj pubmedcentral proquest gale pubmed crossref |
| SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
| StartPage | e1003796 |
| SubjectTerms | Adult Analgesics Analgesics, Opioid - therapeutic use Cancer Care and treatment Chronic pain Complications and side effects Computer and Information Sciences Dosage and administration Drug Prescriptions Drugs Electronic Health Records Electronic medical records Engineering and Technology Evidence-Based Medicine Family physicians Feedback Feedback (Psychology) Fentanyl Health care Humans Interrupted Time Series Analysis Intervention Linear Models Medical referrals Medicine and Health Sciences Mental health Methods Morphine Mortality Multilevel Analysis Narcotics Opioids Outcome Assessment, Health Care Pain Pain - drug therapy Palliative care Patients People and Places Performance management Physical Sciences Physicians Population Prescribing Primary care Primary Health Care Public health Risk groups Time series Trends |
| SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lj9MwELbQCiEuiPcWFjAIwSlsHn4k3ApiBRIUxGO1t8h27G5ElVRNi8Sf4jcy47hRgyrtHpB6af3ZTTzj8Uwy_oaQ55ZLCV4IrLQi5RHTDg8rMxNxLmyqYmm5p108_Shns_zsrPiyU-oLc8J6euB-4o6li3XswM1gGgxpKgorhOVJxpWtdMw1Wl_werbBVAi1itg_XUH-sShJpQyH5jKZHAcZvVrCboM5AplEwv6dTclz9w8W-mC5aLt97ue_WZQ729LJTXIj-JN02t_HLXLFNrfJtU_hjfkd8gf0gIakDdo6qhpqQyHRCL5U1J9k_B31BKq2og62M63MT1rvZENS_Czrtq4oJs6CpYGAek6hC23aJjKoOiu6VHUD3QDiGSwoZpW9plMa0uEXMLofdLVZgp9Lsaw9xRVgO7iSnhvlLvlx8u772_dRqNEQGVGwdQQSAY9DK4f5na4C2cbCZAokk6Y2c9rETmteVAzCQKyFxRNl8OGpNkwI5YrsHjmAC7WHhCqIlYWLq6RKHFNxqqGTtCx3AmywzOMJybZCKk0gMMc6GovSv5WTEMj0c16iaMsg2gmJhl7h9i_Av0H5D1ik3_Y_gFKWQSnLi5RyQp6g9pT9WdbBiJRTZHuTLE_gb555BFJwNJjjM1ebris_fD69BOjb7DKgryPQywByLcyZUeHwBcw88n-NkC9GyHnPfr4PeDQCglkyo-ZDXDnbOe5KiLNzZJJiKfTcrqb9zU-HZhwUswAb224Qg2yOEIPzCbnfL75BThkTGG2wCZGjZTkS5Lilqc89n3rO8gI088H_kPxDcj3FrCdMMWFH5GC92thH5Kr5ta671WNvpP4C61yXAQ priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – databaseName: Publicly Available Content Database dbid: PIMPY link: http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lj9MwELagixAS4rE8trCAQYg9hebhxAkXVBArVmJLxWO1nCLbsUtESULTIvGn-I3MJG5oUAV7QOql9Th14pnxjPPNZ0Ie65BziELA0hI_dJg0WKzMlBOGkfaFy3XY0C6evOGTSXx6mkxteXRtYZVrn9g46pbtGXHb4IRHWalwx3wEQXuMtDTMf159c_AMKXzXag_UOE92kHgrHpCd6dHx9FOXgCVus-eCrGSO53NuS-kC7o3szD2tYA1C5EDAkcZ_Y6lqGP07vz2o5mW9LSj9E1u5sVgdXv2_t3mNXLFBKx23WnadnNPFLrl4bF_L75LL7eYfbWuabpCfoHzUIkVoaagoqLanlzrwJaNN-eQPp2Vt1Rk1sIZKob7QfAOCSfFT5WWeUUTrgnuDLH5GoQstysJRqK8LWom8gG4g0tBmUISyPaNjajH4c7h6c9HFqoLgmi7zr5qi2ekaRtISstwkHw9ffXj52rEHQzgqStjS4ZCEJZ4UBkGlJgOFciMVCOlCMKkDI5VrpAyTjIES4AFcoScU7thKxaJImCS4RQYwUL1HqIAEPTJu5mWeYcL1JXTimsUmAsfPY3dIgrUOpMqypuPhHfO0eRXIIXtq5yBFzUmt5gyJ0_Wyt_8P-ReoXp0scn43P5SLWWpdSMqNK10DATeTEFL4UaKjSIdeEAqYIjeUQ_IAlTNtC2g7z5WOkWKOs9iDv3nUSCDvR4HAoplY1XV69PbkDELvJ2cRetcTOrBCpoRnpoSt-IAnj6RjPcknPclZS7m-TXC_Jwi-UPWa99Aw18-4Tn8bEPRcG9z25oddM14UoYeFLlcogxSSkPiHQ3K7te1ungIWYYrDhoT3rL43kf2WIv_ckLjHLE5AM-_8fVh3ySUfQVSIWGH7ZLBcrPQ9ckF9X-b14r71b78AkFW3Pw priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest |
| Title | The effects of an evidence- and theory-informed feedback intervention on opioid prescribing for non-cancer pain in primary care: A controlled interrupted time series analysis |
| URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34606504 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2598100842 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2579378625 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC8489725 https://doaj.org/article/7f0b0f1934b847269e66e5135aedb05b http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003796 |
| Volume | 18 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos000703370200001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVAON databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals customDbUrl: eissn: 1549-1676 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0029090 issn: 1549-1676 databaseCode: DOA dateStart: 20040101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.doaj.org/ providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Health & Medical Collection customDbUrl: eissn: 1549-1676 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0029090 issn: 1549-1676 databaseCode: 7X7 dateStart: 20041001 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/healthcomplete providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: ProQuest Central customDbUrl: eissn: 1549-1676 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0029090 issn: 1549-1676 databaseCode: BENPR dateStart: 20041001 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.proquest.com/central providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: ProQuest Publicly Available Content Database customDbUrl: eissn: 1549-1676 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0029090 issn: 1549-1676 databaseCode: PIMPY dateStart: 20041001 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://search.proquest.com/publiccontent providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVATS databaseName: Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access customDbUrl: eissn: 1549-1676 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0029090 issn: 1549-1676 databaseCode: FPL dateStart: 20040101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://www.plos.org/publications/ providerName: Public Library of Science |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1tb9MwELZYhxAS4mW8rDCKQQg-BfLi2AnfOrSKSVupBkzlU2QndokoSdW0SPwpfiN3iRuWaRNDqio1fpy4vjv7Lj4_JuSlDoUALwQsLfZDhymDm5VZ6oQh1750hQ5r2sXTIzEeR9NpPPkbKJ5bwQ-E99b26ZsFzA64ph-ImG-RbT_gHFO4RpOjNsCK3di12-Muq9mZfmqW_nYs7i3mZXWRo3k-X_LMBDS6879Nv0tuW1eTDhvduEeu6WKH3Di2i-k75Fbzyo42O5Huk9-gMtTmd9DSUFlQbc8cdeBHRutNj7-chmtVZ9TAzKdk-p3mZxInKX4WeZlnFHNsYVCC2HtGoQotysJJUcuWdCHzAqoBpCa7oJiA9o4Oqc2cn8Pd65su1wtwiekq_6EpGouuoCUNjcoD8mV08Pn9B8ce5-CkPGYrR0DoFHtKGkwFNRmogcvTQCoXXEAdGJW6RqkwzhhEjHhsVujJFN-zqpRxLk0cPCQ9aKjeJVRCWM2Nm3mZZ5h0fQWVhGaR4TBci8jtk2Aj5SS1XOd45MY8qRfwBMQ8jQwSFE1iRdMnTlvL_v1_4PdRgVosMnXXF0AHEmv4iTCucg24yUyBI-DzWHOuQy8IJYjIDVWfPEP1S5ptr-14kwyRGE6wyIPHvKgRyNZRYDrQTK6rKjn8eHoF0KfxVUAnHdBrCzIl9Fkq7T4N6HmkCusgX3WQs4Yo_SLgXgcII1jaKd5F09v0cZVASB4h6RTzoebGHC8uft4W400xYbDQ5RoxSPwI4XrYJ48a623lFDCOgQnrE9Gx644guyVF_q2mXo9YFINmPr68xU_ITR_TnjDHhO2R3mq51k_J9fTnKq-WA7IlpqL-jgZke_9gPDkZ1K-BBvVIBtcmh8eTr38AXPmcvg |
| linkProvider | Public Library of Science |
| linkToHtml | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMw1V1bb9MwFLamggAJcRmXFQYziMtTWC5OnCAhNC7TqnUFjTH1LdiOPSJGUpoWtD-138g5idstqIK97AGpL62PU9c-Pj7H_c53CHmiQ87BC4Gdlvihw6TBZGWmnDCMtC9crsOadnG_zweDeDhMPi6R41kuDMIqZzaxNtRZqfCOfB3c9BiJaJj_evTDwapR-O_qrIRGoxbb-ugXhGzVq947WN-nvr_5fu_tlmOrCjgqStjE4eDBJ54UBhGJJoPRuJEKhHTBE9GBkco1UoZJxiBwwepNoScUXvdJxaJIGCRfApN_Aew4RwgZH54EeIlb3-kg65nj-ZzbVL2Ae-tWM16M4IxDZELAsUzAqaOwrhgwPxc6o8OyWuT0_ondPHUYbl7_36bxBrlm3W660eyTm2RJF8vk0o4FFiyTq831JW2ysm6RY9g-1GJdaGmoKKi29VcdeJPROgH0yGl4Z3VGDXgBUqhvND8FIqX4GuVlnlHEG4OBluApUOhCi7JwFO64MR2JvIBuIFITf1AE472kG9RmERzC0-uHjqcjCA_oJP-uKRoOXcFIGkqZ2-TzuczeHdKBgeoVQkUMZ4RxMy_zDBOuL6ET1yw2ERxdPHa7JJhpWaos7zuWHzlM6z8zOcR_zRqkqJup1c0ucea97M__h_wbVOC5LLKW1x-U44PUGsGUG1e6BkIGJsEp8qNER5EOvSAUsERuKLtkDdU_bVKA57Y33UCSPM5iD77mcS2BzCUFQqMOxLSq0t6H_TMIfRqcRWi3JfTcCpkS5kwJm7MCM4-0aS3JZy3Jg4Y0fpHgaksQrLlqNa_g1p_NcZWebFjoOdvSi5sfzZvxoQieLHQ5RRkkwYwjP-ySu431mK9TwCIM0liX8JZdaS1ku6XIv9Y09DGLE9DMe38f1hq5vLW300_7vcH2fXLFR0gY4m_YKulMxlP9gFxUPyd5NX5Y21JKvpy31fkN2HoGHg |
| linkToPdf | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMw1V1bb9MwFLamgiYkxGVcVhjMIC5PYbk4cYKEUGFUTBtl4jLtLdiOXSJKUpoWtD_FD-DXcU7idg2aYC97QOpL6-PUtY8_n-Oe8x1CHuiQc7BCYKclfugwaTBZmSknDCPtC5frsKZdPNjjg0F8eJjsr5Bf81wYDKucY2IN1Fmp8I58C8z0GIlomL9lbFjE_nb_-fibgxWk8J_WeTmNRkV29dEPcN-qZzvbsNYPfb__6sPL146tMOCoKGFTh4M1n3hSGIxONBmMzI1UIKQLVokOjFSukTJMMgZODFZyCj2h8OpPKhZFwiARE8D_OR4EHMtG8MNjZy9x6_sdZEBzPJ9zm7YXcG_LasmTMZx3GKUQcCwZsHQs1tUDFmdEZzwqq5MM4D_jOJcOxv7l_3lKr5BL1hynvWb_XCUrulgjq29swMEaudhca9ImW-sa-QnbitoYGFoaKgqqbV1WB95ktE4MPXIaPlqdUQPWgRTqC82XgkspvsZ5mWcU45ABuCVYEBS60KIsHIU7cULHIi-gG4jUhCAUg_Se0h612QUjeHr90MlsDG4DneZfNUVA0RWMpKGauU4-nsns3SAdGKheJ1TEcHYYN_MyzzDh-hI6cc1iE8GRxmO3S4K5xqXK8sFjWZJRWv_JycEvbNYgRT1NrZ52ibPoZX_-P-RfoDIvZJHNvP6gnAxTC44pN650DbgSTIKx5EeJjiIdekEoYIncUHbJJm6FtEkNXmBy2kPyPM5iD77mfi2BjCYFKvJQzKoq3Xl7cAqh94PTCL1rCT22QqaEOVPC5rLAzCOdWkvyUUty2JDJnyS40RIElFet5nWEgfkcV-nx5oWe8-19cvO9RTM-FIMqC13OUAbJMePID7vkZoMki3UKWITOG-sS3sKY1kK2W4r8c01PH7M4Ac289fdhbZJVAJt0b2ewe5tc8DFSDMNy2AbpTCczfYecV9-neTW5W8MqJZ_OGnR-A8plDtI |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+effects+of+an+evidence-+and+theory-informed+feedback+intervention+on+opioid+prescribing+for+non-cancer+pain+in+primary+care%3A+A+controlled+interrupted+time+series+analysis&rft.jtitle=PLoS+medicine&rft.au=Alderson%2C+Sarah+L.&rft.au=Farragher%2C+Tracey+M.&rft.au=Willis%2C+Thomas+A.&rft.au=Carder%2C+Paul&rft.date=2021-10-04&rft.pub=Public+Library+of+Science&rft.issn=1549-1277&rft.eissn=1549-1676&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=10&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.1003796&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F34606504&rft.externalDocID=PMC8489725 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1549-1676&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1549-1676&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1549-1676&client=summon |