Variations in achievement of evidence-based, high-impact quality indicators in general practice: An observational study
There are widely recognised variations in the delivery and outcomes of healthcare but an incomplete understanding of their causes. There is a growing interest in using routinely collected 'big data' in the evaluation of healthcare. We developed a set of evidence-based 'high impact...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one Jg. 12; H. 7; S. e0177949 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
United States
Public Library of Science
13.07.2017
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| Schlagworte: | |
| ISSN: | 1932-6203, 1932-6203 |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| Abstract | There are widely recognised variations in the delivery and outcomes of healthcare but an incomplete understanding of their causes. There is a growing interest in using routinely collected 'big data' in the evaluation of healthcare. We developed a set of evidence-based 'high impact' quality indicators (QIs) for primary care and examined variations in achievement of these indicators using routinely collected data in the United Kingdom (UK).
Cross-sectional analysis of routinely collected, electronic primary care data from a sample of general practices in West Yorkshire, UK (n = 89). The QIs covered aspects of care (including processes and intermediate clinical outcomes) in relation to diabetes, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, myocardial infarction, chronic kidney disease (CKD) and 'risky' prescribing combinations. Regression models explored the impact of practice and patient characteristics. Clustering within practice was accounted for by including a random intercept for practice.
Median practice achievement of the QIs ranged from 43.2% (diabetes control) to 72.2% (blood pressure control in CKD). Considerable between-practice variation existed for all indicators: the difference between the highest and lowest performing practices was 26.3 percentage points for risky prescribing and 100 percentage points for anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation. Odds ratios associated with the random effects for practices emphasised this; there was a greater than ten-fold difference in the likelihood of achieving the hypertension indicator between the lowest and highest performing practices. Patient characteristics, in particular age, gender and comorbidity, were consistently but modestly associated with indicator achievement. Statistically significant practice characteristics were identified less frequently in adjusted models.
Despite various policy and improvement initiatives, there are enduring inappropriate variations in the delivery of evidence-based care. Much of this variation is not explained by routinely collected patient or practice variables, and is likely to be attributable to differences in clinical and organisational behaviour. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | There are widely recognised variations in the delivery and outcomes of healthcare but an incomplete understanding of their causes. There is a growing interest in using routinely collected 'big data' in the evaluation of healthcare. We developed a set of evidence-based 'high impact' quality indicators (QIs) for primary care and examined variations in achievement of these indicators using routinely collected data in the United Kingdom (UK). Cross-sectional analysis of routinely collected, electronic primary care data from a sample of general practices in West Yorkshire, UK (n = 89). The QIs covered aspects of care (including processes and intermediate clinical outcomes) in relation to diabetes, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, myocardial infarction, chronic kidney disease (CKD) and 'risky' prescribing combinations. Regression models explored the impact of practice and patient characteristics. Clustering within practice was accounted for by including a random intercept for practice. Median practice achievement of the QIs ranged from 43.2% (diabetes control) to 72.2% (blood pressure control in CKD). Considerable between-practice variation existed for all indicators: the difference between the highest and lowest performing practices was 26.3 percentage points for risky prescribing and 100 percentage points for anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation. Odds ratios associated with the random effects for practices emphasised this; there was a greater than ten-fold difference in the likelihood of achieving the hypertension indicator between the lowest and highest performing practices. Patient characteristics, in particular age, gender and comorbidity, were consistently but modestly associated with indicator achievement. Statistically significant practice characteristics were identified less frequently in adjusted models. Despite various policy and improvement initiatives, there are enduring inappropriate variations in the delivery of evidence-based care. Much of this variation is not explained by routinely collected patient or practice variables, and is likely to be attributable to differences in clinical and organisational behaviour. There are widely recognised variations in the delivery and outcomes of healthcare but an incomplete understanding of their causes. There is a growing interest in using routinely collected 'big data' in the evaluation of healthcare. We developed a set of evidence-based 'high impact' quality indicators (QIs) for primary care and examined variations in achievement of these indicators using routinely collected data in the United Kingdom (UK).BACKGROUNDThere are widely recognised variations in the delivery and outcomes of healthcare but an incomplete understanding of their causes. There is a growing interest in using routinely collected 'big data' in the evaluation of healthcare. We developed a set of evidence-based 'high impact' quality indicators (QIs) for primary care and examined variations in achievement of these indicators using routinely collected data in the United Kingdom (UK).Cross-sectional analysis of routinely collected, electronic primary care data from a sample of general practices in West Yorkshire, UK (n = 89). The QIs covered aspects of care (including processes and intermediate clinical outcomes) in relation to diabetes, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, myocardial infarction, chronic kidney disease (CKD) and 'risky' prescribing combinations. Regression models explored the impact of practice and patient characteristics. Clustering within practice was accounted for by including a random intercept for practice.METHODSCross-sectional analysis of routinely collected, electronic primary care data from a sample of general practices in West Yorkshire, UK (n = 89). The QIs covered aspects of care (including processes and intermediate clinical outcomes) in relation to diabetes, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, myocardial infarction, chronic kidney disease (CKD) and 'risky' prescribing combinations. Regression models explored the impact of practice and patient characteristics. Clustering within practice was accounted for by including a random intercept for practice.Median practice achievement of the QIs ranged from 43.2% (diabetes control) to 72.2% (blood pressure control in CKD). Considerable between-practice variation existed for all indicators: the difference between the highest and lowest performing practices was 26.3 percentage points for risky prescribing and 100 percentage points for anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation. Odds ratios associated with the random effects for practices emphasised this; there was a greater than ten-fold difference in the likelihood of achieving the hypertension indicator between the lowest and highest performing practices. Patient characteristics, in particular age, gender and comorbidity, were consistently but modestly associated with indicator achievement. Statistically significant practice characteristics were identified less frequently in adjusted models.RESULTSMedian practice achievement of the QIs ranged from 43.2% (diabetes control) to 72.2% (blood pressure control in CKD). Considerable between-practice variation existed for all indicators: the difference between the highest and lowest performing practices was 26.3 percentage points for risky prescribing and 100 percentage points for anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation. Odds ratios associated with the random effects for practices emphasised this; there was a greater than ten-fold difference in the likelihood of achieving the hypertension indicator between the lowest and highest performing practices. Patient characteristics, in particular age, gender and comorbidity, were consistently but modestly associated with indicator achievement. Statistically significant practice characteristics were identified less frequently in adjusted models.Despite various policy and improvement initiatives, there are enduring inappropriate variations in the delivery of evidence-based care. Much of this variation is not explained by routinely collected patient or practice variables, and is likely to be attributable to differences in clinical and organisational behaviour.CONCLUSIONSDespite various policy and improvement initiatives, there are enduring inappropriate variations in the delivery of evidence-based care. Much of this variation is not explained by routinely collected patient or practice variables, and is likely to be attributable to differences in clinical and organisational behaviour. BackgroundThere are widely recognised variations in the delivery and outcomes of healthcare but an incomplete understanding of their causes. There is a growing interest in using routinely collected 'big data' in the evaluation of healthcare. We developed a set of evidence-based 'high impact' quality indicators (QIs) for primary care and examined variations in achievement of these indicators using routinely collected data in the United Kingdom (UK).MethodsCross-sectional analysis of routinely collected, electronic primary care data from a sample of general practices in West Yorkshire, UK (n = 89). The QIs covered aspects of care (including processes and intermediate clinical outcomes) in relation to diabetes, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, myocardial infarction, chronic kidney disease (CKD) and 'risky' prescribing combinations. Regression models explored the impact of practice and patient characteristics. Clustering within practice was accounted for by including a random intercept for practice.ResultsMedian practice achievement of the QIs ranged from 43.2% (diabetes control) to 72.2% (blood pressure control in CKD). Considerable between-practice variation existed for all indicators: the difference between the highest and lowest performing practices was 26.3 percentage points for risky prescribing and 100 percentage points for anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation. Odds ratios associated with the random effects for practices emphasised this; there was a greater than ten-fold difference in the likelihood of achieving the hypertension indicator between the lowest and highest performing practices. Patient characteristics, in particular age, gender and comorbidity, were consistently but modestly associated with indicator achievement. Statistically significant practice characteristics were identified less frequently in adjusted models.ConclusionsDespite various policy and improvement initiatives, there are enduring inappropriate variations in the delivery of evidence-based care. Much of this variation is not explained by routinely collected patient or practice variables, and is likely to be attributable to differences in clinical and organisational behaviour. Background There are widely recognised variations in the delivery and outcomes of healthcare but an incomplete understanding of their causes. There is a growing interest in using routinely collected 'big data' in the evaluation of healthcare. We developed a set of evidence-based 'high impact' quality indicators (QIs) for primary care and examined variations in achievement of these indicators using routinely collected data in the United Kingdom (UK). Methods Cross-sectional analysis of routinely collected, electronic primary care data from a sample of general practices in West Yorkshire, UK (n = 89). The QIs covered aspects of care (including processes and intermediate clinical outcomes) in relation to diabetes, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, myocardial infarction, chronic kidney disease (CKD) and 'risky' prescribing combinations. Regression models explored the impact of practice and patient characteristics. Clustering within practice was accounted for by including a random intercept for practice. Results Median practice achievement of the QIs ranged from 43.2% (diabetes control) to 72.2% (blood pressure control in CKD). Considerable between-practice variation existed for all indicators: the difference between the highest and lowest performing practices was 26.3 percentage points for risky prescribing and 100 percentage points for anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation. Odds ratios associated with the random effects for practices emphasised this; there was a greater than ten-fold difference in the likelihood of achieving the hypertension indicator between the lowest and highest performing practices. Patient characteristics, in particular age, gender and comorbidity, were consistently but modestly associated with indicator achievement. Statistically significant practice characteristics were identified less frequently in adjusted models. Conclusions Despite various policy and improvement initiatives, there are enduring inappropriate variations in the delivery of evidence-based care. Much of this variation is not explained by routinely collected patient or practice variables, and is likely to be attributable to differences in clinical and organisational behaviour. There are widely recognised variations in the delivery and outcomes of healthcare but an incomplete understanding of their causes. There is a growing interest in using routinely collected 'big data' in the evaluation of healthcare. We developed a set of evidence-based 'high impact' quality indicators (QIs) for primary care and examined variations in achievement of these indicators using routinely collected data in the United Kingdom (UK). Cross-sectional analysis of routinely collected, electronic primary care data from a sample of general practices in West Yorkshire, UK (n = 89). The QIs covered aspects of care (including processes and intermediate clinical outcomes) in relation to diabetes, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, myocardial infarction, chronic kidney disease (CKD) and 'risky' prescribing combinations. Regression models explored the impact of practice and patient characteristics. Clustering within practice was accounted for by including a random intercept for practice. Median practice achievement of the QIs ranged from 43.2% (diabetes control) to 72.2% (blood pressure control in CKD). Considerable between-practice variation existed for all indicators: the difference between the highest and lowest performing practices was 26.3 percentage points for risky prescribing and 100 percentage points for anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation. Odds ratios associated with the random effects for practices emphasised this; there was a greater than ten-fold difference in the likelihood of achieving the hypertension indicator between the lowest and highest performing practices. Patient characteristics, in particular age, gender and comorbidity, were consistently but modestly associated with indicator achievement. Statistically significant practice characteristics were identified less frequently in adjusted models. Despite various policy and improvement initiatives, there are enduring inappropriate variations in the delivery of evidence-based care. Much of this variation is not explained by routinely collected patient or practice variables, and is likely to be attributable to differences in clinical and organisational behaviour. Background There are widely recognised variations in the delivery and outcomes of healthcare but an incomplete understanding of their causes. There is a growing interest in using routinely collected ‘big data’ in the evaluation of healthcare. We developed a set of evidence-based ‘high impact’ quality indicators (QIs) for primary care and examined variations in achievement of these indicators using routinely collected data in the United Kingdom (UK). Methods Cross-sectional analysis of routinely collected, electronic primary care data from a sample of general practices in West Yorkshire, UK (n = 89). The QIs covered aspects of care (including processes and intermediate clinical outcomes) in relation to diabetes, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, myocardial infarction, chronic kidney disease (CKD) and ‘risky’ prescribing combinations. Regression models explored the impact of practice and patient characteristics. Clustering within practice was accounted for by including a random intercept for practice. Results Median practice achievement of the QIs ranged from 43.2% (diabetes control) to 72.2% (blood pressure control in CKD). Considerable between-practice variation existed for all indicators: the difference between the highest and lowest performing practices was 26.3 percentage points for risky prescribing and 100 percentage points for anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation. Odds ratios associated with the random effects for practices emphasised this; there was a greater than ten-fold difference in the likelihood of achieving the hypertension indicator between the lowest and highest performing practices. Patient characteristics, in particular age, gender and comorbidity, were consistently but modestly associated with indicator achievement. Statistically significant practice characteristics were identified less frequently in adjusted models. Conclusions Despite various policy and improvement initiatives, there are enduring inappropriate variations in the delivery of evidence-based care. Much of this variation is not explained by routinely collected patient or practice variables, and is likely to be attributable to differences in clinical and organisational behaviour. |
| Audience | Academic |
| Author | Foy, Robbie Glidewell, Liz Faulkner, Simon West, Robert Rushforth, Bruno Carder, Paul Stokes, Tim Willis, Thomas A. |
| AuthorAffiliation | University of the West Indies Faculty of Medical Sciences Mona, JAMAICA 2 Foundry Lane Surgery, Leeds, United Kingdom 1 Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom 3 Department of General Practice & Rural Health, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand 4 West Yorkshire Research & Development, NHS Bradford Districts CCG, Douglas Mill, Bradford, United Kingdom 5 NHS Digital, Leeds, United Kingdom |
| AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: 3 Department of General Practice & Rural Health, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand – name: 5 NHS Digital, Leeds, United Kingdom – name: 1 Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom – name: 4 West Yorkshire Research & Development, NHS Bradford Districts CCG, Douglas Mill, Bradford, United Kingdom – name: 2 Foundry Lane Surgery, Leeds, United Kingdom – name: University of the West Indies Faculty of Medical Sciences Mona, JAMAICA |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Thomas A. orcidid: 0000-0002-0252-9923 surname: Willis fullname: Willis, Thomas A. – sequence: 2 givenname: Robert surname: West fullname: West, Robert – sequence: 3 givenname: Bruno surname: Rushforth fullname: Rushforth, Bruno – sequence: 4 givenname: Tim surname: Stokes fullname: Stokes, Tim – sequence: 5 givenname: Liz surname: Glidewell fullname: Glidewell, Liz – sequence: 6 givenname: Paul surname: Carder fullname: Carder, Paul – sequence: 7 givenname: Simon surname: Faulkner fullname: Faulkner, Simon – sequence: 8 givenname: Robbie surname: Foy fullname: Foy, Robbie |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28704407$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNqNk9uK2zAQhk3Z0j20b1Baw0JpoUklW7asvSiEpYfAwkIPeytkaWQrOFZWstPm7askTomXpRRf2Iy--Ufze-Y8OmltC1H0EqMpTin-sLC9a0UzXYXwFGFKGWFPojPM0mSSJyg9Ofo-jc69XyCUpUWeP4tOk4IiQhA9i37dCWdEZ2zrY9PGQtYG1rCEtoutjmFtFLQSJqXwoN7HtanqiVmuhOzi-140ptuELGWk6KzbCVTQghNNvHKBMRKu4lkb29KDW--qhCPf9WrzPHqqRePhxfC-iH5-_vTj-uvk5vbL_Hp2M5E5S7oJAAiNcYqoZAwzSVVJCS11GZrVQBKd46IoUgIqx0RLzBjFWBZCkTQrCyXSi-j1XnfVWM8HzzzHQSzDGUEsEPM9oaxY8JUzS-E23ArDdwHrKi5caKUBLpjIS6QSLJgipaYlLklBFSpJinWe6aD1cajWl0tQMtgYzBiJjk9aU_PKrnmWIYYRCQJvBwFn73vwHV8aL6FpRAu23947oen21yUBvXyAPt7dQFUiNGBabUNduRXlM8IKQlJU5IGaPkKFR8HSyDBg2oT4KOHdKCEwHfzuKtF7z-ffv_0_e3s3Zt8csTWIpqu9bfrdgI7BV8dO_7X4MNkBuNoD0lnvHWguTbcbwdCaaThGfLtGB9P4do34sEYhmTxIPuj_M-0PdtIi2Q |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2019_030076 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11606_020_05676_7 crossref_primary_10_1111_dme_14159 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2020_041460 crossref_primary_10_2196_34141 crossref_primary_10_3389_fendo_2021_617902 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0272662 crossref_primary_10_1111_dom_13821 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13012_017_0704_7 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2025_102044 crossref_primary_10_1186_s40352_022_00175_9 crossref_primary_10_1111_dme_13810 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13293_019_0277_z crossref_primary_10_1093_ckj_sfaf180 crossref_primary_10_1093_fampra_cmaa024 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2020_040961 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pcd_2020_11_018 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0312137 crossref_primary_10_1186_s40352_022_00200_x crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pmed_1003045 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182a51b3d 10.3399/bjgp16X683509 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31803bb479 10.1056/NEJMsa022615 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00620-6 10.1136/qhc.0100152 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155 10.1136/bmj.c6267 10.1136/bmj.323.7316.784 10.1186/2047-2501-2-3 10.1503/cmaj.121802 10.1136/bmj.h176 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31820f0ed0 10.1186/1748-5908-7-24 10.1056/NEJMhpr041294 10.1370/afm.1377 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003190 10.1186/s12875-015-0350-6 10.1136/qhc.12.6.421 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008270 10.1001/jama.2013.393 10.1186/1471-2296-7-68 10.1093/ageing/afr097 10.1136/bmj.a957 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.02.014 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.6217 10.1186/1471-2296-14-23 10.1136/bmj.38632.611123.AE 10.3310/hta8060 10.3399/bjgp13X671588 10.1093/fampra/cmw003 10.1371/journal.pone.0025987 10.1186/1472-6904-12-5 10.1093/fampra/cmp095 10.1056/NEJMsa066253 10.1186/1748-5908-4-18 10.1136/bmj.i4060 10.1136/bmj.a1107 10.1136/bmj.h949 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | COPYRIGHT 2017 Public Library of Science 2017 Willis et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. 2017 Willis et al 2017 Willis et al |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: COPYRIGHT 2017 Public Library of Science – notice: 2017 Willis et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. – notice: 2017 Willis et al 2017 Willis et al |
| CorporateAuthor | on behalf of the ASPIRE programme team ASPIRE programme team |
| CorporateAuthor_xml | – name: on behalf of the ASPIRE programme team – name: ASPIRE programme team |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM IOV ISR 3V. 7QG 7QL 7QO 7RV 7SN 7SS 7T5 7TG 7TM 7U9 7X2 7X7 7XB 88E 8AO 8C1 8FD 8FE 8FG 8FH 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABJCF ABUWG AEUYN AFKRA ARAPS ATCPS AZQEC BBNVY BENPR BGLVJ BHPHI C1K CCPQU D1I DWQXO FR3 FYUFA GHDGH GNUQQ H94 HCIFZ K9. KB. KB0 KL. L6V LK8 M0K M0S M1P M7N M7P M7S NAPCQ P5Z P62 P64 PATMY PDBOC PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQGLB PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS PTHSS PYCSY RC3 7X8 5PM DOA |
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0177949 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints Gale In Context: Science ProQuest Central (Corporate) Animal Behavior Abstracts Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B) Biotechnology Research Abstracts Nursing & Allied Health Database Ecology Abstracts Entomology Abstracts (Full archive) Immunology Abstracts Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts Nucleic Acids Abstracts Virology and AIDS Abstracts Agricultural Science Collection ProQuest Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Pharma Collection Public Health Database Technology Research Database ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Technology Collection ProQuest Natural Science Collection Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) Materials Science & Engineering Collection ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest One Sustainability ProQuest Central UK/Ireland Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database (1962 - current) Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection ProQuest Central Essentials - QC Biological Science Collection AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central Technology collection Natural Science Collection Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Materials Science Collection ProQuest Central Korea Engineering Research Database Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central Student AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Materials Science Database Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition) Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic ProQuest Engineering Collection Biological Sciences Agricultural Science Database ProQuest Health & Medical Collection PML(ProQuest Medical Library) Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C) Biological Science Database Engineering Database Nursing & Allied Health Premium Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Environmental Science Database Materials Science Collection Proquest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Academic (retired) ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China Engineering Collection Environmental Science Collection Genetics Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Agricultural Science Database Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Central Student ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection ProQuest Central Essentials Nucleic Acids Abstracts SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest Central China Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Sustainability Health Research Premium Collection Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts Natural Science Collection Health & Medical Research Collection Biological Science Collection ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) Engineering Collection Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection Engineering Database Virology and AIDS Abstracts ProQuest Biological Science Collection ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition Agricultural Science Collection ProQuest Hospital Collection ProQuest Technology Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) Biological Science Database Ecology Abstracts ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Environmental Science Collection Entomology Abstracts Nursing & Allied Health Premium ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Environmental Science Database ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source (Alumni) Engineering Research Database ProQuest One Academic Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) Technology Collection Technology Research Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) Materials Science Collection ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest Natural Science Collection ProQuest Pharma Collection ProQuest Central ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection Genetics Abstracts ProQuest Engineering Collection Biotechnology Research Abstracts Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B) Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C) Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts Materials Science Database ProQuest Materials Science Collection ProQuest Public Health ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source ProQuest SciTech Collection Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database ProQuest Medical Library Animal Behavior Abstracts Materials Science & Engineering Collection Immunology Abstracts ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic Agricultural Science Database MEDLINE |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: PIMPY name: Publicly Available Content Database url: http://search.proquest.com/publiccontent sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Sciences (General) |
| DocumentTitleAlternate | Variations in achievement of indicators in general practice |
| EISSN | 1932-6203 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 1919515409 oai_doaj_org_article_a9a6b0d21a9d4bf7b1b487d0b431f65f PMC5509104 A498443086 28704407 10_1371_journal_pone_0177949 |
| Genre | Journal Article Observational Study |
| GeographicLocations | United Kingdom--UK England |
| GeographicLocations_xml | – name: England – name: United Kingdom--UK |
| GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: Department of Health grantid: RP-PG-1209-10040 – fundername: ; grantid: RP-PG-1209-10040 |
| GroupedDBID | --- 123 29O 2WC 53G 5VS 7RV 7X2 7X7 7XC 88E 8AO 8C1 8CJ 8FE 8FG 8FH 8FI 8FJ A8Z AAFWJ AAUCC AAWOE AAYXX ABDBF ABIVO ABJCF ABUWG ACCTH ACGFO ACIHN ACIWK ACPRK ACUHS ADBBV ADRAZ AEAQA AENEX AEUYN AFFHD AFKRA AFPKN AFRAH AHMBA ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AOIJS APEBS ARAPS ATCPS BAIFH BAWUL BBNVY BBTPI BCNDV BENPR BGLVJ BHPHI BKEYQ BPHCQ BVXVI BWKFM CCPQU CITATION CS3 D1I D1J D1K DIK DU5 E3Z EAP EAS EBD EMOBN ESX EX3 F5P FPL FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HCIFZ HH5 HMCUK HYE IAO IEA IGS IHR IHW INH INR IOV IPY ISE ISR ITC K6- KB. KQ8 L6V LK5 LK8 M0K M1P M48 M7P M7R M7S M~E NAPCQ O5R O5S OK1 OVT P2P P62 PATMY PDBOC PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PPXIY PQGLB PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO PTHSS PV9 PYCSY RNS RPM RZL SV3 TR2 UKHRP WOQ WOW ~02 ~KM ALIPV CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF IPNFZ NPM RIG BBORY 3V. 7QG 7QL 7QO 7SN 7SS 7T5 7TG 7TM 7U9 7XB 8FD 8FK AZQEC C1K DWQXO ESTFP FR3 GNUQQ H94 K9. KL. M7N P64 PKEHL PQEST PQUKI PRINS RC3 7X8 PUEGO 5PM AAPBV ABPTK |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-eeeaf11307c9919c7db747bfb949fe42f6188834ed614fc199711c8ad435b8da3 |
| IEDL.DBID | FPL |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 26 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000405649700004&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 1932-6203 |
| IngestDate | Sun Oct 01 00:11:26 EDT 2023 Fri Oct 03 12:51:11 EDT 2025 Tue Nov 04 02:00:39 EST 2025 Mon Sep 08 03:05:58 EDT 2025 Tue Oct 07 07:34:52 EDT 2025 Sat Nov 29 13:16:55 EST 2025 Sat Nov 29 10:05:41 EST 2025 Wed Nov 26 09:51:20 EST 2025 Wed Nov 26 10:03:46 EST 2025 Thu May 22 21:22:25 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 05:50:52 EDT 2025 Sat Nov 29 02:08:20 EST 2025 Tue Nov 18 21:36:28 EST 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 7 |
| Language | English |
| License | This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Creative Commons Attribution License |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c692t-eeeaf11307c9919c7db747bfb949fe42f6188834ed614fc199711c8ad435b8da3 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. Conceptualization: TAW BR LG TS RF.Data curation: SF RW.Formal analysis: RW.Funding acquisition: RF.Investigation: TAW SF.Methodology: TAW BR SF RF.Project administration: TAW.Resources: PC SF.Software: SF.Supervision: TAW RF.Validation: TAW BR RF.Visualization: TAW RW.Writing – original draft: TAW.Writing – review & editing: TAW BR RW TS LG RF. Membership of the ASPIRE programme team is provided in the Acknowledegements |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-0252-9923 |
| OpenAccessLink | http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177949 |
| PMID | 28704407 |
| PQID | 1919515409 |
| PQPubID | 1436336 |
| PageCount | e0177949 |
| ParticipantIDs | plos_journals_1919515409 doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_a9a6b0d21a9d4bf7b1b487d0b431f65f pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5509104 proquest_miscellaneous_1927304402 proquest_journals_1919515409 gale_infotracmisc_A498443086 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A498443086 gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A498443086 gale_incontextgauss_IOV_A498443086 gale_healthsolutions_A498443086 pubmed_primary_28704407 crossref_citationtrail_10_1371_journal_pone_0177949 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0177949 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2017-07-13 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2017-07-13 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 07 year: 2017 text: 2017-07-13 day: 13 |
| PublicationDecade | 2010 |
| PublicationPlace | United States |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States – name: San Francisco – name: San Francisco, CA USA |
| PublicationTitle | PloS one |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | PLoS One |
| PublicationYear | 2017 |
| Publisher | Public Library of Science Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Public Library of Science – name: Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| References | M Lugtenberg (ref10) 2011; 6 M Roland (ref23) 2004; 351 P Dawda (ref6) 2010 R Lau (ref51) 2015; 5 TA Willis (ref52) 2016; 11 R Cooksey (ref2) 2006 MD Beaulieu (ref49) 2013; 185 P van den Hombergh (ref46) 2013; 14 KD Wyatt (ref11) 2014; 52 E Wallace (ref4) 2015; 350 T Higashi (ref43) 2007; 356 E Nouwens (ref45) 2012; 70 SA Kirk (ref16) 2003; 12 J Smith (ref7) 2013 D McBride (ref27) 2010; 341 B Guthrie (ref42) 2015; 5 M Roland (ref24) 2016; 354 TB Murdoch (ref19) 2013; 309 LD Woodard (ref44) 2011; 49 SJ Gillam (ref39) 2012; 10 FDR Hobbs (ref3) 2016; 387 (ref22) 2013 D Reeves (ref38) 2007; 45 M Eccles (ref1) 2009; 4 SM Campbell (ref35) 2001; 323 N Steel (ref17) 2008; 337 B Baird (ref5) 2016 W Raghupathi (ref20) 2014; 2 SJ Stocks (ref41) 2015; 351 ref30 T Dreischulte (ref25) 2012; 7 E Kontopantelis (ref36) 2013; 3 R Lawton (ref47) 2016; 11 B Rushforth (ref8) 2015; 16 ME Seddon (ref13) 2001; 10 DM Levine (ref33) 2016; 176 SM Campbell (ref15) 2005; 331 (ref21) 2015 D Pugh (ref40) 2011; 40 M Ashworth (ref29) 2006; 7 VS Raleigh (ref37) 2008; 337 CW Ng (ref28) 2013; 63 T Dreischulte (ref26) 2012; 12 S Dumbreck (ref9) 2015; 350 J Cohen (ref32) 1992; 112 PA Lord (ref31) 2016; 33 R Baker (ref14) 2002; 52 B Rushforth (ref48) 2016; 66 EA McGlynn (ref12) 2003; 348 L Down (ref34) 2009; 62 AS Abdelhamid (ref18) 2010; 27 JM Grimshaw (ref50) 2004; 8 |
| References_xml | – volume: 52 start-page: S92 issue: Suppl 3 year: 2014 ident: ref11 article-title: Out of context: clinical practice guidelines and patients with multiple chronic conditions: a systematic review publication-title: Med Care doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182a51b3d – volume: 66 start-page: e114 year: 2016 ident: ref48 article-title: Barriers to effective management of type 2 diabetes in primary care: qualitative systematic review publication-title: Br J Gen Pract doi: 10.3399/bjgp16X683509 – volume: 45 start-page: 489 year: 2007 ident: ref38 article-title: Combining multiple indicators of clinical quality: an evaluation of different analytic approaches publication-title: Med Care doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31803bb479 – volume: 348 start-page: 2635 year: 2003 ident: ref12 article-title: The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States publication-title: N Engl J Med doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa022615 – volume: 387 start-page: 2323 year: 2016 ident: ref3 article-title: Clinical workload in UK primary care: a retrospective analysis of 100 million consultations in England, 2007–14 publication-title: Lancet doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00620-6 – volume: 10 start-page: 152 year: 2001 ident: ref13 article-title: Systematic review of studies of quality of clinical care in general practice in the UK, Australia and New Zealand publication-title: Qual Health Care doi: 10.1136/qhc.0100152 – volume: 112 start-page: 155 year: 1992 ident: ref32 article-title: A power primer publication-title: Psychol Bull doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155 – volume: 341 start-page: c6267 year: 2010 ident: ref27 article-title: Explaining variation in referral from primary to secondary care: cohort study publication-title: BMJ doi: 10.1136/bmj.c6267 – ident: ref30 – volume: 323 start-page: 784 year: 2001 ident: ref35 article-title: Identifying predictors of high quality care in English general practice: observational study publication-title: BMJ doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7316.784 – year: 2016 ident: ref5 article-title: Understanding pressures in general practice – volume: 2 start-page: 1 year: 2014 ident: ref20 article-title: Big data analytics in healthcare: promise and potential publication-title: Health Inf Sci Syst doi: 10.1186/2047-2501-2-3 – volume: 185 start-page: E590 year: 2013 ident: ref49 article-title: Characteristics of primary care practices associated with high quality of care publication-title: Can Med Assoc J doi: 10.1503/cmaj.121802 – volume: 350 start-page: h176 year: 2015 ident: ref4 article-title: Managing patients with multimorbidity in primary care publication-title: BMJ doi: 10.1136/bmj.h176 – volume: 49 start-page: 605 year: 2011 ident: ref44 article-title: Impact of comorbidity type on measures of quality for diabetes care publication-title: Med Care doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31820f0ed0 – volume: 7 start-page: 24 year: 2012 ident: ref25 article-title: A cluster randomised stepped wedge trial to evaluate the effectiveness of a multifaceted information technology-based intervention in reducing high-risk prescribing of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and antiplatelets in primary medical care: The DQIP study protocol publication-title: Implement Sci doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-24 – volume: 5 year: 2015 ident: ref51 article-title: Achieving change in primary care—effectiveness of strategies for improving implementation of complex interventions: systematic review of reviews publication-title: BMJ Open – volume: 351 start-page: 1448 year: 2004 ident: ref23 article-title: Linking physicians' pay to the quality of care—a major experiment in the United Kingdom publication-title: N Engl J Med doi: 10.1056/NEJMhpr041294 – volume: 10 start-page: 461 year: 2012 ident: ref39 article-title: Pay-for-performance in the United Kingdom: Impact of the quality and outcomes framework—a systematic review publication-title: Ann Fam Med doi: 10.1370/afm.1377 – volume: 3 year: 2013 ident: ref36 article-title: Relationship between quality of care and choice of clinical computing system: retrospective analysis of family practice performance under the UK's quality and outcomes framework publication-title: BMJ Open doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003190 – volume: 16 start-page: 156 year: 2015 ident: ref8 article-title: Developing 'high impact' guideline-based quality indicators for UK primary care: a multi-stage consensus process publication-title: BMC Fam Pract doi: 10.1186/s12875-015-0350-6 – year: 2013 ident: ref7 article-title: New models of primary care – year: 2010 ident: ref6 article-title: Quality improvement in general practice – volume: 12 start-page: 421 year: 2003 ident: ref16 article-title: Assessing the quality of care of multiple conditions in general practice: practical and methodological problems publication-title: Qual Saf Health Care doi: 10.1136/qhc.12.6.421 – volume: 5 year: 2015 ident: ref42 article-title: Bad apples or spoiled barrels? Multilevel modelling analysis of variation in high-risk prescribing in Scotland between general practitioners and between the practices they work in publication-title: BMJ Open doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008270 – volume: 309 start-page: 1351 year: 2013 ident: ref19 article-title: The inevitable application of big data to health care publication-title: JAMA doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.393 – volume: 7 start-page: 68 year: 2006 ident: ref29 article-title: The relationship between general practice characteristics and quality of care: a national survey of quality indicators used in the UK Quality and Outcomes Framework, 2004–5 publication-title: BMC Fam Pract doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-7-68 – volume: 40 start-page: 675 year: 2011 ident: ref40 article-title: Attitudes of physicians regarding anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review publication-title: Age Ageing doi: 10.1093/ageing/afr097 – volume: 337 start-page: a957 year: 2008 ident: ref17 article-title: Self reported receipt of care consistent with 32 quality indicators: national population survey of adults aged 50 or more in England publication-title: BMJ doi: 10.1136/bmj.a957 – volume: 62 start-page: 67 year: 2009 ident: ref34 article-title: Factors distinguishing general practitioners who more readily participated in a large randomized trial were identified publication-title: J Clin Epidemiol doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.02.014 – volume: 176 start-page: 1778 year: 2016 ident: ref33 article-title: The Quality of Outpatient Care Delivered to Adults in the United States, 2002 to 2013 publication-title: JAMA Intern Med doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.6217 – volume: 351 year: 2015 ident: ref41 article-title: Examining variations in prescribing safety in UK general practice: cross sectional study using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink publication-title: BMJ – volume: 14 start-page: 23 year: 2013 ident: ref46 article-title: Are family practice trainers and their host practices any better? comparing practice trainers and non-trainers and their practices publication-title: BMC Fam Pract doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-14-23 – volume: 331 start-page: 1121 year: 2005 ident: ref15 article-title: Improvements in quality of clinical care in English general practice 1998–2003: longitudinal observational study publication-title: BMJ doi: 10.1136/bmj.38632.611123.AE – volume: 8 start-page: iii year: 2004 ident: ref50 article-title: Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies publication-title: Health Technol Assess doi: 10.3310/hta8060 – volume: 63 start-page: e604 year: 2013 ident: ref28 article-title: Does practice size matter? Review of effects on quality of care in primary care publication-title: Br J Gen Pract doi: 10.3399/bjgp13X671588 – volume: 33 start-page: 200 year: 2016 ident: ref31 article-title: Optimizing primary care research participation: a comparison of three recruitment methods in data-sharing studies publication-title: Fam Pract doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmw003 – year: 2015 ident: ref21 article-title: NHS Atlas of Variation in Healthcare – volume: 6 start-page: e25987 year: 2011 ident: ref10 article-title: Current guidelines have limited applicability to patients with comorbid conditions: a systematic analysis of evidence-based guidelines publication-title: PLoS ONE doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025987 – year: 2013 ident: ref22 article-title: Improving outcomes for people with, or at risk of, cardiovascular disease – year: 2006 ident: ref2 article-title: A review of UK health research funding – volume: 12 start-page: 5 year: 2012 ident: ref26 article-title: Quality and safety of medication use in primary care: consensus validation of a new set of explicit medication assessment criteria and prioritisation of topics for improvement publication-title: BMC Clin Pharmacol doi: 10.1186/1472-6904-12-5 – volume: 27 start-page: 186 year: 2010 ident: ref18 article-title: Predictors of the quality of care for asthma in general practice: an observational study publication-title: Fam Pract doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmp095 – volume: 356 start-page: 2496 year: 2007 ident: ref43 article-title: Relationship between number of medical conditions and quality of care publication-title: N Engl J Med doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa066253 – volume: 4 start-page: 18 year: 2009 ident: ref1 article-title: An implementation research agenda publication-title: Implement Sci doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-18 – volume: 11 start-page: 1 year: 2016 ident: ref52 article-title: Action to Support Practices Implement Research Evidence (ASPIRE): protocol for a cluster-randomised evaluation of adaptable implementation packages targeting ‘high impact’ clinical practice recommendations in general practice publication-title: Implement Sci – volume: 354 start-page: i4060 year: 2016 ident: ref24 article-title: Quality and Outcomes Framework: what have we learnt? publication-title: BMJ doi: 10.1136/bmj.i4060 – volume: 11 year: 2016 ident: ref47 article-title: Using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to understand adherence to multiple evidence-based indicators in primary care: A qualitative study publication-title: Implement Sci – volume: 337 year: 2008 ident: ref37 article-title: Collection of data on ethnic origin in England publication-title: BMJ doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1107 – volume: 350 start-page: h949 year: 2015 ident: ref9 article-title: Drug-disease and drug-drug interactions: systematic examination of recommendations in 12 UK national clinical guidelines publication-title: BMJ doi: 10.1136/bmj.h949 – volume: 52 start-page: S2 issue: Suppl year: 2002 ident: ref14 article-title: General practice: continuous quality improvement since 1948 publication-title: Br J Gen Pract – volume: 70 start-page: 298 year: 2012 ident: ref45 article-title: Comorbidity complicates cardiovascular treatment: is diabetes the exception? publication-title: Neth J Med |
| SSID | ssj0053866 |
| Score | 2.3745935 |
| Snippet | There are widely recognised variations in the delivery and outcomes of healthcare but an incomplete understanding of their causes. There is a growing interest... Background There are widely recognised variations in the delivery and outcomes of healthcare but an incomplete understanding of their causes. There is a... BackgroundThere are widely recognised variations in the delivery and outcomes of healthcare but an incomplete understanding of their causes. There is a growing... Background There are widely recognised variations in the delivery and outcomes of healthcare but an incomplete understanding of their causes. There is a... |
| SourceID | plos doaj pubmedcentral proquest gale pubmed crossref |
| SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
| StartPage | e0177949 |
| SubjectTerms | Age Aged Aged, 80 and over Anticoagulants Atrial Fibrillation - therapy Blood pressure Cardiac arrhythmia Clinical medicine Clustering Comorbidity Cross-Sectional Studies Data management Diabetes Diabetes mellitus Diabetes Mellitus - therapy Disease control Family medicine Fibrillation General Practice - standards Health care Health sciences Heart attacks Humans Hypertension Hypertension - therapy Indicators Information management Kidney transplantation Medical care Medicine and Health Sciences Middle Aged Myocardial infarction Myocardial Infarction - therapy Observational studies Organizational aspects Patients Physicians Practice Patterns, Physicians' - standards Primary care Primary Health Care - standards Quality Quality control Quality Indicators, Health Care R&D Regression Analysis Regression models Renal Insufficiency, Chronic - therapy Research & development Statistical analysis United Kingdom |
| SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9NAEF6hiAMXRHnVkMKCkACJbWN7_eIWEBVcCuJR9bbaZ4lU2VGdUPHvmdldWzWqVA5cMxMrmZmdh3fmG0JeKM3zzNaOWSiSGYeQzCALcQyxxkxdLKwyYdlEdXRUn5w0Xy6t-sKesAAPHAR3IBtZqoXJUtkYrlylUgU5tlkoiHyuLBx6X8h6hmIq-GA4xWUZB-XyKj2Ietlfd63dBxsEI2wmgcjj9Y9eebY-6_qrUs6_OycvhaLDO-R2zCHpMvz2HXLDtnfJTjylPX0VoaRf3yMXx1AKh3dydNVSbJy0HiB8QztHbdwoyjCUmTcUoYtZGJukYdjyN8UrbY2FuX_AaXgyHWar3tJlSzs1vtkFkservU9-HH74_v4ji6sWmC6bbMOstdKlEM8qDapqdGUU1BnKKRCUszxzZQqlcs6tgXDuNHanpKmupYFsS9VG5g_IrAXh7hJaKFk6qbWzwJ-nRiJkvuJlJvPUysIlJB_kLnTEIcd1GGfCX65VUI8EMQrUlojaSggbv7UOOBzX8L9DlY68iKLtPwDbEtG2xHW2lZCnaBAijKSOvkAseVNznkM1mJDnngORNFps1TmV274Xnz4f_wPTt68TppeRyXUgDi3jeAT8J0TomnDOJ5zgD_SEvIvmO0ilF1CRQxoNmTkIZT6Y9NXkZyMZH4rtd63ttsgDWS4uJ88S8jCcgFGyeFMOlCoh1eRsTEQ_pbSrnx7IvPDZKn_0P3T1mNzKMONCzNN8Tmab863dIzf1r82qP3_ivcMfojNtrg priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – databaseName: Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database dbid: P5Z link: http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Zb9QwELZg4YEXoFwNFDAICZBwu0mcixe0ICp4KRVHVfXF8rmsVCXLZhfEv2fGcQJBFSDxmplYyVye8fENIY-U5mliS8csFMmMw5TMIAtxDLHGTJlNrTJds4ni4KA8Pq4Ow4JbG45V9jHRB2rTaFwj34O6ApIByC-qF8svDLtG4e5qaKFxnlxAlAR0zMPspI_E4Mt5Hq7LpUW8F7Szu2xquwuWCKZYjaYjj9o_xObJ8rRpz0o8fz8_-cuEtH_lf3_lKrkcUlE662xni5yz9TWyFZy9pU8CIvXT6-TbEVTU3dIeXdQUz19ajzO-po2jNjQmZTgjmmcUEZBZd_uSdnc2v1PcGddY3_sB5t3ItL-i9ZzOatqoYYEYSB729gb5tP_646s3LHRsYDqvkjWz1koXw7RYaNB4pQujoFxRToGkneWJy2OouFNuDWQFTuMhlzjWpTSQtKnSyPQmmdSgnW1CMyVzJ7V2FvjT2EhE3lc8T2QaW5m5iKS94oQOcObYVeNU-D26AsqaTowC1S2CuiPChreWHZzHX_hfok0MvAjG7R80q7kIvi1kJXM1NUksK8OVK1SsoAw0UwXf7XL81PtoUaK72TqEFDHjVcl5CkVlRB56DgTkqPHEz1xu2la8fXf0D0wf3o-YHgcm14A4tAy3LOCfEOhrxLkz4oSwokfkbbT_Xiqt-Gm18GZv12eTHwxkHBRP8dW22SAPJMvY4zyJyK3OhQbJ4oY7UIqIFCPnGol-TKkXnz0eeuaTXn77z591h1xKMCVDUNR0h0zWq429Sy7qr-tFu7rnA8cPJq97HQ priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest |
| Title | Variations in achievement of evidence-based, high-impact quality indicators in general practice: An observational study |
| URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28704407 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1919515409 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1927304402 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC5509104 https://doaj.org/article/a9a6b0d21a9d4bf7b1b487d0b431f65f http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177949 |
| Volume | 12 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos000405649700004&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVAON databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals customDbUrl: eissn: 1932-6203 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0053866 issn: 1932-6203 databaseCode: DOA dateStart: 20060101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.doaj.org/ providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – providerCode: PRVHPJ databaseName: ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources customDbUrl: eissn: 1932-6203 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0053866 issn: 1932-6203 databaseCode: M~E dateStart: 20060101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://road.issn.org providerName: ISSN International Centre – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database customDbUrl: eissn: 1932-6203 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0053866 issn: 1932-6203 databaseCode: P5Z dateStart: 20061201 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/hightechjournals providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Agricultural Science Database customDbUrl: eissn: 1932-6203 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0053866 issn: 1932-6203 databaseCode: M0K dateStart: 20061201 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/agriculturejournals providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Biological Science Database (ProQuest) customDbUrl: eissn: 1932-6203 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0053866 issn: 1932-6203 databaseCode: M7P dateStart: 20061201 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://search.proquest.com/biologicalscijournals providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Engineering Database customDbUrl: eissn: 1932-6203 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0053866 issn: 1932-6203 databaseCode: M7S dateStart: 20061201 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://search.proquest.com providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Environmental Science Database customDbUrl: eissn: 1932-6203 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0053866 issn: 1932-6203 databaseCode: PATMY dateStart: 20061201 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://search.proquest.com/environmentalscience providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Health & Medical Collection customDbUrl: eissn: 1932-6203 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0053866 issn: 1932-6203 databaseCode: 7X7 dateStart: 20061201 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/healthcomplete providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Materials Science Database customDbUrl: eissn: 1932-6203 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0053866 issn: 1932-6203 databaseCode: KB. dateStart: 20061201 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://search.proquest.com/materialsscijournals providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Nursing & Allied Health Database customDbUrl: eissn: 1932-6203 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0053866 issn: 1932-6203 databaseCode: 7RV dateStart: 20061201 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/nahs providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: ProQuest Central customDbUrl: eissn: 1932-6203 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0053866 issn: 1932-6203 databaseCode: BENPR dateStart: 20061201 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.proquest.com/central providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Public Health Database customDbUrl: eissn: 1932-6203 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0053866 issn: 1932-6203 databaseCode: 8C1 dateStart: 20061201 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/publichealth providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Publicly Available Content Database customDbUrl: eissn: 1932-6203 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0053866 issn: 1932-6203 databaseCode: PIMPY dateStart: 20061201 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://search.proquest.com/publiccontent providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVATS databaseName: Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access customDbUrl: eissn: 1932-6203 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0053866 issn: 1932-6203 databaseCode: FPL dateStart: 20060101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://www.plos.org/publications/ providerName: Public Library of Science |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3db9MwELdYxwMvg_G1QikGIQHSUpqP5oO3dlrFNFaiDqrCS-TPrdKUVEsL4r_nznEDmTYBL_eQO1vO2Wff2eefCXnFReB7KtaOgiDZCWBJdsAL0Q5ijcl40FdcVo9NRJNJPJ8n6e9A8coJvh-576xOe8siVz0YPzCAki2y7flhiClc4_TjZuYF2w1Dez3uppKN5ceg9NdzcWt5UZTXOZpX8yX_WIDGd_-36ffIjnU16bAaG7vklsrvk11rzCV9YxGn3z4gP2YQMVdbd3SRU8yvVAZHfEULTZV9eNTBFU_uU0Q4dqrblbS6k_mT4sm3wPjdVHBW1Uw3V7De02FOC15vAAPLwNo-JF_Gh58PPjj2RQZHhIm3cpRSTLuw7EUCejQRkeQQjnDN4ce0CjwduhBR-4GSsOprgUksritiJsEp47Fk_iPSykEZe4QOOAs1E0IrkPddyRBZnwehx3xXsYFuE3_TUZmwcOX4asZFZs7gIghbKjVmqN3MardNnLrUsoLr-Iv8CMdALYtg2-YDdGNmbTdjCQt5X3ouS2TAdcRdDmGe7HNotw6xqc9xBGXVzdV6ysiGQRIHgQ9BY5u8NBIIuJFjRs8ZW5dldvRp9g9Cp9OG0GsrpAtQh2D2FgX8EwJ5NSQ7DUmYNkSDvYfjfaOVMoPAHbxtcOBBKZ2NDVzPflGzsVLM0stVsUYZcIbxDXOvTR5XJlNrFg_UgRO1SdQwpobqm5x8cW7wzgfGqQ2e3Nzip-SOh-4WAp76HdJaXa7VM3JbfF8tyssu2YqmM6TzyNAYaHzgdsn26HCSTrtmH6ZrphKgx6Me0JP-MdIoNfQUaDr4BiXSo5P06y9QyXX- |
| linkProvider | Public Library of Science |
| linkToHtml | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMw1V3db9NADD-NggQvwPhaYbADgQCJbE1yzQcSQuVjWrVRJhhT38J9lkpTUpqWaf8UfyP25RIImoCXPfBaO6erY_vsi_0zIQ-FZGGgE-NpSJI9BkeyB1GI8RBrTCX9nhaqGjYRj0bJeJzur5DvdS8MllXWPtE6alVIvCPfgrwCggGIL9KXs68eTo3Cr6v1CI1KLXb1yTGkbOWL4Rt4v4-CYPvtwesdz00V8GSUBgtPa82ND647lrCrVMZKQEgtjEhZajQLTORDVhgyreDkMhILMXxfJlxBYCESxUNY9xw5D348xhKyeNwkeOA7osi154Wxv-W0YXNW5HoTNB9UP20df3ZKQHMWdGZHRXlaoPt7veYvB-D2lf9NdFfJZRdq00FlG6tkRefXyKpzZiV94hC3n14nx4d8XqloSac5xfpSbXHUF7QwVLvBqx6e-OoZRYRnr-oupVVP6gnFL_8S7y_sApNqZVq3oD2ng5wWorkAB5KF9b1BPp2JAG6STg7asEZoX_DIcCmNBv7QVxwnCwgWBTz0Ne-bLglrRcmkg2vHqSFHmf0GGUPaVokxQ_XKnHp1idc8NavgSv7C_wp1sOFFsHH7QzGfZM53ZTzlkeipwOepYsLEwheQ5qqegH2bCLe6gRqcVZ27jcvMBixNGAshae6SB5YDAUdyrGia8GVZZsP3h__A9PFDi-mxYzIFiENy10UC_wmBzFqc6y1OcJuyRV5De6ulUmY_rQSerO3odPL9hoyLYpVirosl8kAygDPcgy65VZlsI1ksKABK3CVxy5hbom9T8ukXi_fet0E9u_3nbW2QizsH7_ayveFo9w65FGD4iQCw4TrpLOZLfZdckN8W03J-zzotSj6ftan_AKMH2JQ |
| linkToPdf | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMw1V3db9NADD-NghAvwPhaYbADgQCJrE1yzQcSQoUxUQ2Vio9p4iXcZ6k0JaVpmfav8ddhXy6BoAl42QOvtXO6OrbPvtg_E3JfSBYGOjGehiTZY3AkexCFGA-xxlQy6GuhqmET8XicHBykkzXyve6FwbLK2idaR60KiXfkPcgrIBiA-CLtGVcWMdnZfT7_6uEEKfzSWo_TqFRkTx8fQfpWPhvtwLt-EAS7rz68fO25CQOejNJg6WmtufHBjccSdpjKWAkIr4URKUuNZoGJfMgQQ6YVnGJGYlGG78uEKwgyRKJ4COueIWdjyDEx8ZsMPtWnAPiRKHKtemHs95xmbM-LXG-DFYAZpK2j0E4MaM6FzvywKE8Ken-v3fzlMNy99D-L8TK56EJwOqxsZp2s6fwKWXdOrqSPHBL346vkaJ8vKtUt6SynWHeqLb76khaGajeQ1cNIQD2hiPzsVV2ntOpVPaZYESDxXsMuMK1WpnVr2lM6zGkhmotxIFm432vk46kI4Drp5KAZG4QOBI8Ml9Jo4A99xXHigGBRwENf84HpkrBWmkw6GHecJnKY2W-TMaRzlRgzVLXMqVqXeM1T8wrG5C_8L1AfG14EIbc_FItp5nxaxlMeib4KfJ4qJkwsfAHpr-oL2LeJcKtbqM1Z1dHbuNJsyNKEsRCS6S65ZzkQiCRHXZzyVVlmo7f7_8D0_l2L6aFjMgWIQ3LXXQL_CQHOWpybLU5wp7JF3kDbq6VSZj8tBp6sbepk8t2GjIti9WKuixXyQJKAs92DLrlRmW8jWSw0AErcJXHLsFuib1Py2ReLAz-wwT67-edtbZHzYOHZm9F47xa5EGBUiriw4SbpLBcrfZuck9-Ws3Jxx_ovSj6ftqX_AG7b4Yc |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Variations+in+achievement+of+evidence-based%2C+high-impact+quality+indicators+in+general+practice%3A+An+observational+study&rft.jtitle=PloS+one&rft.au=Willis%2C+Thomas+A.&rft.au=West%2C+Robert&rft.au=Rushforth%2C+Bruno&rft.au=Stokes%2C+Tim&rft.date=2017-07-13&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=e0177949&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0177949&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1371_journal_pone_0177949 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1932-6203&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1932-6203&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1932-6203&client=summon |