Performance of cardiopulmonary exercise testing for the prediction of post-operative complications in non cardiopulmonary surgery: A systematic review
Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is widely used within the United Kingdom for preoperative risk stratification. Despite this, CPET's performance in predicting adverse events has not been systematically evaluated within the framework of classifier performance. After prospective registrati...
Saved in:
| Published in: | PloS one Vol. 15; no. 2; p. e0226480 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
United States
Public Library of Science
03.02.2020
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| Subjects: | |
| ISSN: | 1932-6203, 1932-6203 |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Abstract | Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is widely used within the United Kingdom for preoperative risk stratification. Despite this, CPET's performance in predicting adverse events has not been systematically evaluated within the framework of classifier performance.
After prospective registration on PROSPERO (CRD42018095508) we systematically identified studies where CPET was used to aid in the prognostication of mortality, cardiorespiratory complications, and unplanned intensive care unit (ICU) admission in individuals undergoing non-cardiopulmonary surgery. For all included studies we extracted or calculated measures of predictive performance whilst identifying and critiquing predictive models encompassing CPET derived variables.
We identified 36 studies for qualitative review, from 27 of which measures of classifier performance could be calculated. We found studies to be highly heterogeneous in methodology and quality with high potential for bias and confounding. We found seven studies that presented risk prediction models for outcomes of interest. Of these, only four studies outlined a clear process of model development; assessment of discrimination and calibration were performed in only two and only one study undertook internal validation. No scores were externally validated. Systematically identified and calculated measures of test performance for CPET demonstrated mixed performance. Data was most complete for anaerobic threshold (AT) based predictions: calculated sensitivities ranged from 20-100% when used for predicting risk of mortality with high negative predictive values (96-100%). In contrast, positive predictive value (PPV) was poor (2.9-42.1%). PPV appeared to be generally higher for cardiorespiratory complications, with similar sensitivities. Similar patterns were seen for the association of Peak VO2 (sensitivity 85.7-100%, PPV 2.7-5.9%) and VE/VCO2 (Sensitivity 27.8%-100%, PPV 3.4-7.1%) with mortality.
In general CPET's 'rule-out' capability appears better than its ability to 'rule-in' complications. Poor PPV may reflect the frequency of complications in studied populations. Our calculated estimates of classifier performance suggest the need for a balanced interpretation of the pros and cons of CPET guided pre-operative risk stratification. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | IntroductionCardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is widely used within the United Kingdom for preoperative risk stratification. Despite this, CPET's performance in predicting adverse events has not been systematically evaluated within the framework of classifier performance.MethodsAfter prospective registration on PROSPERO (CRD42018095508) we systematically identified studies where CPET was used to aid in the prognostication of mortality, cardiorespiratory complications, and unplanned intensive care unit (ICU) admission in individuals undergoing non-cardiopulmonary surgery. For all included studies we extracted or calculated measures of predictive performance whilst identifying and critiquing predictive models encompassing CPET derived variables.ResultsWe identified 36 studies for qualitative review, from 27 of which measures of classifier performance could be calculated. We found studies to be highly heterogeneous in methodology and quality with high potential for bias and confounding. We found seven studies that presented risk prediction models for outcomes of interest. Of these, only four studies outlined a clear process of model development; assessment of discrimination and calibration were performed in only two and only one study undertook internal validation. No scores were externally validated. Systematically identified and calculated measures of test performance for CPET demonstrated mixed performance. Data was most complete for anaerobic threshold (AT) based predictions: calculated sensitivities ranged from 20-100% when used for predicting risk of mortality with high negative predictive values (96-100%). In contrast, positive predictive value (PPV) was poor (2.9-42.1%). PPV appeared to be generally higher for cardiorespiratory complications, with similar sensitivities. Similar patterns were seen for the association of Peak VO2 (sensitivity 85.7-100%, PPV 2.7-5.9%) and VE/VCO2 (Sensitivity 27.8%-100%, PPV 3.4-7.1%) with mortality.ConclusionsIn general CPET's 'rule-out' capability appears better than its ability to 'rule-in' complications. Poor PPV may reflect the frequency of complications in studied populations. Our calculated estimates of classifier performance suggest the need for a balanced interpretation of the pros and cons of CPET guided pre-operative risk stratification. Introduction Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is widely used within the United Kingdom for preoperative risk stratification. Despite this, CPET’s performance in predicting adverse events has not been systematically evaluated within the framework of classifier performance. Methods After prospective registration on PROSPERO (CRD42018095508) we systematically identified studies where CPET was used to aid in the prognostication of mortality, cardiorespiratory complications, and unplanned intensive care unit (ICU) admission in individuals undergoing non-cardiopulmonary surgery. For all included studies we extracted or calculated measures of predictive performance whilst identifying and critiquing predictive models encompassing CPET derived variables. Results We identified 36 studies for qualitative review, from 27 of which measures of classifier performance could be calculated. We found studies to be highly heterogeneous in methodology and quality with high potential for bias and confounding. We found seven studies that presented risk prediction models for outcomes of interest. Of these, only four studies outlined a clear process of model development; assessment of discrimination and calibration were performed in only two and only one study undertook internal validation. No scores were externally validated. Systematically identified and calculated measures of test performance for CPET demonstrated mixed performance. Data was most complete for anaerobic threshold (AT) based predictions: calculated sensitivities ranged from 20-100% when used for predicting risk of mortality with high negative predictive values (96-100%). In contrast, positive predictive value (PPV) was poor (2.9-42.1%). PPV appeared to be generally higher for cardiorespiratory complications, with similar sensitivities. Similar patterns were seen for the association of Peak VO2 (sensitivity 85.7-100%, PPV 2.7-5.9%) and VE/VCO2 (Sensitivity 27.8%-100%, PPV 3.4-7.1%) with mortality. Conclusions In general CPET’s ‘rule-out’ capability appears better than its ability to ‘rule-in’ complications. Poor PPV may reflect the frequency of complications in studied populations. Our calculated estimates of classifier performance suggest the need for a balanced interpretation of the pros and cons of CPET guided pre-operative risk stratification. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is widely used within the United Kingdom for preoperative risk stratification. Despite this, CPET's performance in predicting adverse events has not been systematically evaluated within the framework of classifier performance. After prospective registration on PROSPERO (CRD42018095508) we systematically identified studies where CPET was used to aid in the prognostication of mortality, cardiorespiratory complications, and unplanned intensive care unit (ICU) admission in individuals undergoing non-cardiopulmonary surgery. For all included studies we extracted or calculated measures of predictive performance whilst identifying and critiquing predictive models encompassing CPET derived variables. We identified 36 studies for qualitative review, from 27 of which measures of classifier performance could be calculated. We found studies to be highly heterogeneous in methodology and quality with high potential for bias and confounding. We found seven studies that presented risk prediction models for outcomes of interest. Of these, only four studies outlined a clear process of model development; assessment of discrimination and calibration were performed in only two and only one study undertook internal validation. No scores were externally validated. Systematically identified and calculated measures of test performance for CPET demonstrated mixed performance. Data was most complete for anaerobic threshold (AT) based predictions: calculated sensitivities ranged from 20-100% when used for predicting risk of mortality with high negative predictive values (96-100%). In contrast, positive predictive value (PPV) was poor (2.9-42.1%). PPV appeared to be generally higher for cardiorespiratory complications, with similar sensitivities. Similar patterns were seen for the association of Peak VO2 (sensitivity 85.7-100%, PPV 2.7-5.9%) and VE/VCO2 (Sensitivity 27.8%-100%, PPV 3.4-7.1%) with mortality. In general CPET's 'rule-out' capability appears better than its ability to 'rule-in' complications. Poor PPV may reflect the frequency of complications in studied populations. Our calculated estimates of classifier performance suggest the need for a balanced interpretation of the pros and cons of CPET guided pre-operative risk stratification. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is widely used within the United Kingdom for preoperative risk stratification. Despite this, CPET's performance in predicting adverse events has not been systematically evaluated within the framework of classifier performance. After prospective registration on PROSPERO (CRD42018095508) we systematically identified studies where CPET was used to aid in the prognostication of mortality, cardiorespiratory complications, and unplanned intensive care unit (ICU) admission in individuals undergoing non-cardiopulmonary surgery. For all included studies we extracted or calculated measures of predictive performance whilst identifying and critiquing predictive models encompassing CPET derived variables. We identified 36 studies for qualitative review, from 27 of which measures of classifier performance could be calculated. We found studies to be highly heterogeneous in methodology and quality with high potential for bias and confounding. We found seven studies that presented risk prediction models for outcomes of interest. Of these, only four studies outlined a clear process of model development; assessment of discrimination and calibration were performed in only two and only one study undertook internal validation. No scores were externally validated. Systematically identified and calculated measures of test performance for CPET demonstrated mixed performance. Data was most complete for anaerobic threshold (AT) based predictions: calculated sensitivities ranged from 20-100% when used for predicting risk of mortality with high negative predictive values (96-100%). In contrast, positive predictive value (PPV) was poor (2.9-42.1%). PPV appeared to be generally higher for cardiorespiratory complications, with similar sensitivities. Similar patterns were seen for the association of Peak VO.sub.2 (sensitivity 85.7-100%, PPV 2.7-5.9%) and VE/VCO.sub.2 (Sensitivity 27.8%-100%, PPV 3.4-7.1%) with mortality. In general CPET's 'rule-out' capability appears better than its ability to 'rule-in' complications. Poor PPV may reflect the frequency of complications in studied populations. Our calculated estimates of classifier performance suggest the need for a balanced interpretation of the pros and cons of CPET guided pre-operative risk stratification. Introduction Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is widely used within the United Kingdom for preoperative risk stratification. Despite this, CPET's performance in predicting adverse events has not been systematically evaluated within the framework of classifier performance. Methods After prospective registration on PROSPERO (CRD42018095508) we systematically identified studies where CPET was used to aid in the prognostication of mortality, cardiorespiratory complications, and unplanned intensive care unit (ICU) admission in individuals undergoing non-cardiopulmonary surgery. For all included studies we extracted or calculated measures of predictive performance whilst identifying and critiquing predictive models encompassing CPET derived variables. Results We identified 36 studies for qualitative review, from 27 of which measures of classifier performance could be calculated. We found studies to be highly heterogeneous in methodology and quality with high potential for bias and confounding. We found seven studies that presented risk prediction models for outcomes of interest. Of these, only four studies outlined a clear process of model development; assessment of discrimination and calibration were performed in only two and only one study undertook internal validation. No scores were externally validated. Systematically identified and calculated measures of test performance for CPET demonstrated mixed performance. Data was most complete for anaerobic threshold (AT) based predictions: calculated sensitivities ranged from 20-100% when used for predicting risk of mortality with high negative predictive values (96-100%). In contrast, positive predictive value (PPV) was poor (2.9-42.1%). PPV appeared to be generally higher for cardiorespiratory complications, with similar sensitivities. Similar patterns were seen for the association of Peak VO.sub.2 (sensitivity 85.7-100%, PPV 2.7-5.9%) and VE/VCO.sub.2 (Sensitivity 27.8%-100%, PPV 3.4-7.1%) with mortality. Conclusions In general CPET's 'rule-out' capability appears better than its ability to 'rule-in' complications. Poor PPV may reflect the frequency of complications in studied populations. Our calculated estimates of classifier performance suggest the need for a balanced interpretation of the pros and cons of CPET guided pre-operative risk stratification. Introduction Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is widely used within the United Kingdom for preoperative risk stratification. Despite this, CPET’s performance in predicting adverse events has not been systematically evaluated within the framework of classifier performance. Methods After prospective registration on PROSPERO (CRD42018095508) we systematically identified studies where CPET was used to aid in the prognostication of mortality, cardiorespiratory complications, and unplanned intensive care unit (ICU) admission in individuals undergoing non-cardiopulmonary surgery. For all included studies we extracted or calculated measures of predictive performance whilst identifying and critiquing predictive models encompassing CPET derived variables. Results We identified 36 studies for qualitative review, from 27 of which measures of classifier performance could be calculated. We found studies to be highly heterogeneous in methodology and quality with high potential for bias and confounding. We found seven studies that presented risk prediction models for outcomes of interest. Of these, only four studies outlined a clear process of model development; assessment of discrimination and calibration were performed in only two and only one study undertook internal validation. No scores were externally validated. Systematically identified and calculated measures of test performance for CPET demonstrated mixed performance. Data was most complete for anaerobic threshold (AT) based predictions: calculated sensitivities ranged from 20-100% when used for predicting risk of mortality with high negative predictive values (96-100%). In contrast, positive predictive value (PPV) was poor (2.9-42.1%). PPV appeared to be generally higher for cardiorespiratory complications, with similar sensitivities. Similar patterns were seen for the association of Peak VO2 (sensitivity 85.7-100%, PPV 2.7-5.9%) and VE/VCO2 (Sensitivity 27.8%-100%, PPV 3.4-7.1%) with mortality. Conclusions In general CPET’s ‘rule-out’ capability appears better than its ability to ‘rule-in’ complications. Poor PPV may reflect the frequency of complications in studied populations. Our calculated estimates of classifier performance suggest the need for a balanced interpretation of the pros and cons of CPET guided pre-operative risk stratification. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is widely used within the United Kingdom for preoperative risk stratification. Despite this, CPET's performance in predicting adverse events has not been systematically evaluated within the framework of classifier performance.INTRODUCTIONCardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is widely used within the United Kingdom for preoperative risk stratification. Despite this, CPET's performance in predicting adverse events has not been systematically evaluated within the framework of classifier performance.After prospective registration on PROSPERO (CRD42018095508) we systematically identified studies where CPET was used to aid in the prognostication of mortality, cardiorespiratory complications, and unplanned intensive care unit (ICU) admission in individuals undergoing non-cardiopulmonary surgery. For all included studies we extracted or calculated measures of predictive performance whilst identifying and critiquing predictive models encompassing CPET derived variables.METHODSAfter prospective registration on PROSPERO (CRD42018095508) we systematically identified studies where CPET was used to aid in the prognostication of mortality, cardiorespiratory complications, and unplanned intensive care unit (ICU) admission in individuals undergoing non-cardiopulmonary surgery. For all included studies we extracted or calculated measures of predictive performance whilst identifying and critiquing predictive models encompassing CPET derived variables.We identified 36 studies for qualitative review, from 27 of which measures of classifier performance could be calculated. We found studies to be highly heterogeneous in methodology and quality with high potential for bias and confounding. We found seven studies that presented risk prediction models for outcomes of interest. Of these, only four studies outlined a clear process of model development; assessment of discrimination and calibration were performed in only two and only one study undertook internal validation. No scores were externally validated. Systematically identified and calculated measures of test performance for CPET demonstrated mixed performance. Data was most complete for anaerobic threshold (AT) based predictions: calculated sensitivities ranged from 20-100% when used for predicting risk of mortality with high negative predictive values (96-100%). In contrast, positive predictive value (PPV) was poor (2.9-42.1%). PPV appeared to be generally higher for cardiorespiratory complications, with similar sensitivities. Similar patterns were seen for the association of Peak VO2 (sensitivity 85.7-100%, PPV 2.7-5.9%) and VE/VCO2 (Sensitivity 27.8%-100%, PPV 3.4-7.1%) with mortality.RESULTSWe identified 36 studies for qualitative review, from 27 of which measures of classifier performance could be calculated. We found studies to be highly heterogeneous in methodology and quality with high potential for bias and confounding. We found seven studies that presented risk prediction models for outcomes of interest. Of these, only four studies outlined a clear process of model development; assessment of discrimination and calibration were performed in only two and only one study undertook internal validation. No scores were externally validated. Systematically identified and calculated measures of test performance for CPET demonstrated mixed performance. Data was most complete for anaerobic threshold (AT) based predictions: calculated sensitivities ranged from 20-100% when used for predicting risk of mortality with high negative predictive values (96-100%). In contrast, positive predictive value (PPV) was poor (2.9-42.1%). PPV appeared to be generally higher for cardiorespiratory complications, with similar sensitivities. Similar patterns were seen for the association of Peak VO2 (sensitivity 85.7-100%, PPV 2.7-5.9%) and VE/VCO2 (Sensitivity 27.8%-100%, PPV 3.4-7.1%) with mortality.In general CPET's 'rule-out' capability appears better than its ability to 'rule-in' complications. Poor PPV may reflect the frequency of complications in studied populations. Our calculated estimates of classifier performance suggest the need for a balanced interpretation of the pros and cons of CPET guided pre-operative risk stratification.CONCLUSIONSIn general CPET's 'rule-out' capability appears better than its ability to 'rule-in' complications. Poor PPV may reflect the frequency of complications in studied populations. Our calculated estimates of classifier performance suggest the need for a balanced interpretation of the pros and cons of CPET guided pre-operative risk stratification. |
| Audience | Academic |
| Author | Stubbs, Daniel J. Ercole, Ari Grimes, Lisa A. |
| AuthorAffiliation | Medizinische Universitat Graz, AUSTRIA University Division of Anaesthesia, Department of Medicine, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, Cambridge, United Kingdom |
| AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: Medizinische Universitat Graz, AUSTRIA – name: University Division of Anaesthesia, Department of Medicine, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, Cambridge, United Kingdom |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Daniel J. orcidid: 0000-0003-2778-5226 surname: Stubbs fullname: Stubbs, Daniel J. – sequence: 2 givenname: Lisa A. surname: Grimes fullname: Grimes, Lisa A. – sequence: 3 givenname: Ari orcidid: 0000-0001-8350-8093 surname: Ercole fullname: Ercole, Ari |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32012165$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNqNk9tu1DAQhiNURA_wBggsISG42MWxY2_cC6Sq4rBSpSJOt9asM9l1lcTBdkr7IjwvTneLdkuFUC4Sjb__n0PGh9le5zrMsqc5neZ8lr-5cIPvoJn2KTyljMmipA-yg1xxNpGM8r2t7_3sMIQLSgUvpXyU7XNGc5ZLcZD9-oS-dr6FziBxNTHgK-v6oWldB_6a4BV6YwOSiCHabkkSTOIKSe-xsiZa142y3oU4cT16iPYSiXFt31gD43EgtiOp9r-sw-CX6K-PyQkJ1yFim3BDPF5a_Pk4e1hDE_DJ5n2UfXv_7uvpx8nZ-Yf56cnZxEjF4qQsKWdQFRRUVcHYkhIl4whCIKcLA8gELvKyEJIZ5ILLqq6UmbGSShCznB9lz9e-feOC3ow0aMYF5Wl6hUjEfE1UDi50722batcOrL4JOL_U4FPhDeqa1VTNECkAFCBTLarAuqIGRTFTi9Hr7SbbsGixMthFD82O6e5JZ1d66S61VEqWtEgGrzYG3v0Y0h_RrQ0GmwY6dMO67lIpxcZcL-6g93e3oZaQGrBd7VJeM5rqE5nznHIlxrTTe6j0VNhak_avtim-I3i9I0hMxKu4hCEEPf_y-f_Z8--77MstdoXQxFVwzXCzZ7vgs-1J_xnx7eIn4HgNGO9C8FhrY-PNvqbWbKNzqsdbdjs0Pd4yvbllSVzcEd_6_1P2G2Q2Luc |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1136_openhrt_2021_001932 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40140_021_00491_0 crossref_primary_10_11124_JBIES_22_00397 crossref_primary_10_1177_15347354221134249 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejso_2024_108510 crossref_primary_10_1213_ANE_0000000000007494 crossref_primary_10_1093_eurjpc_zwac018 crossref_primary_10_1097_ACO_0000000000000988 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12871_022_01680_y crossref_primary_10_1016_j_accpm_2023_101199 crossref_primary_10_1111_imj_15394 crossref_primary_10_1097_AIA_0000000000000306 crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_021_10183_y crossref_primary_10_1007_s40140_021_00499_6 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pdig_0000851 crossref_primary_10_12968_hmed_2024_0811 crossref_primary_10_1177_17504589231214395 crossref_primary_10_1111_ajco_14069 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00423_024_03560_0 crossref_primary_10_1093_dote_doac005 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bjao_2024_100289 crossref_primary_10_1177_17511437211022128 crossref_primary_10_3390_nu16111783 crossref_primary_10_1111_anae_16543 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40140_021_00488_9 crossref_primary_10_1186_s44158_025_00239_w crossref_primary_10_1155_2021_6633832 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00423_023_03197_5 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0295430 crossref_primary_10_1111_anae_16662 crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_021_10251_3 crossref_primary_10_1177_0310057X211064904 crossref_primary_10_1111_anae_16582 crossref_primary_10_23736_S0021_9509_23_12666_8 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1093/bja/aev454 10.1002/bjs.8773 10.1093/bja/aen310 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31828dbac2 10.1093/bja/aet346 10.1016/j.bja.2019.01.032 10.1308/003588411X587235 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31131-0 10.1002/jso.23670 10.1007/BF02937421 10.1111/bju.12219 10.1378/chest.104.3.701 10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.05.005 10.1016/j.bja.2018.07.002 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181c30fb2 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001744 10.1111/apt.13771 10.1093/bja/aeq128 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2007.04351.x 10.1186/2047-0525-2-4 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201610-818FR 10.1001/jama.289.19.2554 10.1016/j.ejso.2014.03.021 10.7326/0003-4819-158-4-201302190-00009 10.1245/s10434-014-3493-0 10.1002/bjs.8859 10.1371/journal.pone.0064335 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.05.062 10.1093/bja/aet193 10.1378/chest.116.2.355 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000118 10.1002/bjs.10112 10.1308/rcsann.2018.0067 10.1161/CIR.0b013e3181e52e69 10.1016/j.bja.2019.03.022 10.1016/j.ejvs.2012.03.022 10.1007/s40140-018-0246-9 10.1016/j.bja.2017.12.007 10.1067/mtc.2001.113596 10.3109/08958378.2014.955932 10.1186/2047-0525-2-10 10.1378/chest.130.2.517 10.1002/bjs.8896 10.1111/codi.13139 10.1093/bja/aet408 10.1016/j.surg.2019.02.001 10.1007/s10353-015-0359-z 10.1111/hpb.12060 10.1038/nmeth.3945 10.1111/anae.12986 10.1308/rcsann.2013.95.2.125 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.01.242 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181cf811d |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | COPYRIGHT 2020 Public Library of Science 2020 Stubbs et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. 2020 Stubbs et al 2020 Stubbs et al |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: COPYRIGHT 2020 Public Library of Science – notice: 2020 Stubbs et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. – notice: 2020 Stubbs et al 2020 Stubbs et al |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM IOV ISR 3V. 7QG 7QL 7QO 7RV 7SN 7SS 7T5 7TG 7TM 7U9 7X2 7X7 7XB 88E 8AO 8C1 8FD 8FE 8FG 8FH 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABJCF ABUWG AEUYN AFKRA ARAPS ATCPS AZQEC BBNVY BENPR BGLVJ BHPHI C1K CCPQU D1I DWQXO FR3 FYUFA GHDGH GNUQQ H94 HCIFZ K9. KB. KB0 KL. L6V LK8 M0K M0S M1P M7N M7P M7S NAPCQ P5Z P62 P64 PATMY PDBOC PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQGLB PQQKQ PQUKI PTHSS PYCSY RC3 7X8 5PM DOA |
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0226480 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints Gale in Context: Science ProQuest Central (Corporate) Animal Behavior Abstracts Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B) Biotechnology Research Abstracts ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Database Ecology Abstracts Entomology Abstracts (Full archive) Immunology Abstracts Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts Nucleic Acids Abstracts Virology and AIDS Abstracts Agricultural Science Collection Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Pharma Collection ProQuest Public Health Database Technology Research Database ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Technology Collection ProQuest Natural Science Collection Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) Materials Science & Engineering Collection ProQuest Central (Alumni) One Sustainability ProQuest Central UK/Ireland Advanced Technologies & Computer Science Collection Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection ProQuest Central Essentials - QC Biological Science Collection ProQuest Central ProQuest Technology Collection Natural Science Collection Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management ProQuest One ProQuest Materials Science Collection ProQuest Central Engineering Research Database Proquest Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central Student AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Materials Science Database Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition) Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic ProQuest Engineering Collection Biological Sciences Agricultural Science Database ProQuest Health & Medical Collection Medical Database Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C) Biological Science Database Engineering Database Nursing & Allied Health Premium Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Environmental Science Database Materials Science Collection ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Academic (retired) ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Engineering collection Environmental Science Collection Genetics Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Agricultural Science Database Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Central Student ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection ProQuest Central Essentials Nucleic Acids Abstracts SciTech Premium Collection Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Sustainability Health Research Premium Collection Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts Natural Science Collection Health & Medical Research Collection Biological Science Collection ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) Engineering Collection Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection Engineering Database Virology and AIDS Abstracts ProQuest Biological Science Collection ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition Agricultural Science Collection ProQuest Hospital Collection ProQuest Technology Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) Biological Science Database Ecology Abstracts ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Environmental Science Collection Entomology Abstracts Nursing & Allied Health Premium ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Environmental Science Database ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source (Alumni) Engineering Research Database ProQuest One Academic Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) Technology Collection Technology Research Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) Materials Science Collection ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest Natural Science Collection ProQuest Pharma Collection ProQuest Central ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection Genetics Abstracts ProQuest Engineering Collection Biotechnology Research Abstracts Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B) Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C) Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts Materials Science Database ProQuest Materials Science Collection ProQuest Public Health ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source ProQuest SciTech Collection Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database ProQuest Medical Library Animal Behavior Abstracts Materials Science & Engineering Collection Immunology Abstracts ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE Agricultural Science Database MEDLINE - Academic |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: PIMPY name: ProQuest Publicly Available Content Database url: http://search.proquest.com/publiccontent sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Sciences (General) Medicine |
| DocumentTitleAlternate | Cardiopulmonary exercise testing’s performance in predicting postoperative complications: A systematic review |
| EISSN | 1932-6203 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 2350319345 oai_doaj_org_article_f2f097ee0aaa4a669594efd0ce5479b5 PMC6996804 A613103954 32012165 10_1371_journal_pone_0226480 |
| Genre | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Systematic Review Journal Article |
| GeographicLocations | United Kingdom United Kingdom--UK |
| GeographicLocations_xml | – name: United Kingdom – name: United Kingdom--UK |
| GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: Wellcome Trust – fundername: Wellcome Trust grantid: 204017/Z/16/Z – fundername: ; grantid: Clinician PhD Fellowship paid from [Overarching grant: 486 204017/Z/16/Z |
| GroupedDBID | --- 123 29O 2WC 53G 5VS 7RV 7X2 7X7 7XC 88E 8AO 8C1 8CJ 8FE 8FG 8FH 8FI 8FJ A8Z AAFWJ AAUCC AAWOE AAYXX ABDBF ABIVO ABJCF ABUWG ACCTH ACGFO ACIHN ACIWK ACPRK ACUHS ADBBV AEAQA AENEX AEUYN AFFHD AFKRA AFPKN AFRAH AHMBA ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AOIJS APEBS ARAPS ATCPS BAIFH BAWUL BBNVY BBTPI BCNDV BENPR BGLVJ BHPHI BKEYQ BPHCQ BVXVI BWKFM CCPQU CITATION CS3 D1I D1J D1K DIK DU5 E3Z EAP EAS EBD EMOBN ESX EX3 F5P FPL FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HCIFZ HH5 HMCUK HYE IAO IEA IGS IHR IHW INH INR IOV IPY ISE ISR ITC K6- KB. KQ8 L6V LK5 LK8 M0K M1P M48 M7P M7R M7S M~E NAPCQ O5R O5S OK1 OVT P2P P62 PATMY PDBOC PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PPXIY PQGLB PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO PTHSS PV9 PYCSY RNS RPM RZL SV3 TR2 UKHRP WOQ WOW ~02 ~KM ADRAZ ALIPV BBORY CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF IPNFZ NPM RIG 3V. 7QG 7QL 7QO 7SN 7SS 7T5 7TG 7TM 7U9 7XB 8FD 8FK AZQEC C1K DWQXO ESTFP FR3 GNUQQ H94 K9. KL. M7N P64 PKEHL PQEST PQUKI RC3 7X8 PUEGO 5PM - 02 AAPBV ABPTK ADACO BBAFP KM |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-88032ad40a9dda121695823ea55e30bcae25eb184562ce3536dfd9c72806a5713 |
| IEDL.DBID | P5Z |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 39 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000534615800004&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 1932-6203 |
| IngestDate | Fri Nov 26 17:12:29 EST 2021 Fri Oct 03 12:51:02 EDT 2025 Tue Nov 04 01:47:03 EST 2025 Thu Oct 02 10:20:48 EDT 2025 Tue Oct 07 07:47:06 EDT 2025 Sat Nov 29 13:00:09 EST 2025 Sat Nov 29 10:03:25 EST 2025 Wed Nov 26 10:27:06 EST 2025 Wed Nov 26 10:32:52 EST 2025 Thu May 22 21:20:02 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 07:04:33 EDT 2025 Sat Nov 29 01:53:19 EST 2025 Tue Nov 18 20:45:09 EST 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 2 |
| Language | English |
| License | This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Creative Commons Attribution License |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c692t-88032ad40a9dda121695823ea55e30bcae25eb184562ce3536dfd9c72806a5713 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Feature-3 ObjectType-Evidence Based Healthcare-1 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. |
| ORCID | 0000-0001-8350-8093 0000-0003-2778-5226 |
| OpenAccessLink | https://www.proquest.com/docview/2350319345?pq-origsite=%requestingapplication% |
| PMID | 32012165 |
| PQID | 2350319345 |
| PQPubID | 1436336 |
| PageCount | e0226480 |
| ParticipantIDs | plos_journals_2350319345 doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_f2f097ee0aaa4a669594efd0ce5479b5 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6996804 proquest_miscellaneous_2350899925 proquest_journals_2350319345 gale_infotracmisc_A613103954 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A613103954 gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A613103954 gale_incontextgauss_IOV_A613103954 gale_healthsolutions_A613103954 pubmed_primary_32012165 crossref_citationtrail_10_1371_journal_pone_0226480 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0226480 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2020-02-03 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2020-02-03 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 02 year: 2020 text: 2020-02-03 day: 03 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | United States |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States – name: San Francisco – name: San Francisco, CA USA |
| PublicationTitle | PloS one |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | PLoS One |
| PublicationYear | 2020 |
| Publisher | Public Library of Science Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Public Library of Science – name: Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| References | pone.0226480.ref014 I Jammer (pone.0226480.ref021) 2015; 32 MJ Forshaw (pone.0226480.ref046) 2008; 85 M Ney (pone.0226480.ref017) 2016; 44 DMW Powers (pone.0226480.ref023) 2011; 2 TA Bowles (pone.0226480.ref028) 2008; 78 N Freemantle (pone.0226480.ref043) 2003; 289 MA Junejo (pone.0226480.ref033) 2012; 99 VV Chandrabalan (pone.0226480.ref050) 2013; 15 F Ausania (pone.0226480.ref026) 2012; 999 S James (pone.0226480.ref039) 2014; 112 KE Chan (pone.0226480.ref056) 2015; 18 BM Biccard (pone.0226480.ref008) 2018; 120 JM Prentis (pone.0226480.ref053) 2013; 112 P Older (pone.0226480.ref005) 1993; 104 CP Snowden (pone.0226480.ref035) 2013; 257 P McCullough (pone.0226480.ref045) 2006; 130 J Whibley (pone.0226480.ref031) 2018; 44 EW Steyerberg (pone.0226480.ref019) 2010; 21 Y Nagamatsu (pone.0226480.ref037) 2001; 121 M Kanakaraj (pone.0226480.ref059) 2017; 54 P Ajitsaria (pone.0226480.ref002) 2018; 8 MA West (pone.0226480.ref058) 2016; 103 DN Wijeysundera (pone.0226480.ref040) 2018; 391 R Struthers (pone.0226480.ref047) 2008; 101 DJN Wong (pone.0226480.ref012) 2018; 121 El Young (pone.0226480.ref018) 2012; 44 DFJ Dunne (pone.0226480.ref024) 2014; 110 P Older (pone.0226480.ref006) 1999; 116 LH Moyes (pone.0226480.ref052) 2013; 95 pone.0226480.ref011 pone.0226480.ref010 RJ Drummond (pone.0226480.ref025) 2018; 100 J Lever (pone.0226480.ref015) 2016; 13 N Agnew (pone.0226480.ref003) 2010; 10 KGM Moons (pone.0226480.ref020) 2014; 11 CW Lai (pone.0226480.ref051) 2013; 111 I Nikolopoulos (pone.0226480.ref057) 2015; 47 MA West (pone.0226480.ref055) 2014; 40 M Junejo (pone.0226480.ref038) 2014; 21 HM Barakat (pone.0226480.ref027) 2015; 70 AM Molinaro (pone.0226480.ref042) 2014; 2 GJ Balady (pone.0226480.ref004) 2010; 122 J Moran (pone.0226480.ref016) 2016; 116 pone.0226480.ref001 CP Snowden (pone.0226480.ref048) 2010; 251 S Paolillo (pone.0226480.ref007) 2017; 14 S Huddart (pone.0226480.ref009) 2013; 2 JA Hayden (pone.0226480.ref022) 2013; 158 SJ Goodyear (pone.0226480.ref030) 2013; 2 A Thompson (pone.0226480.ref049) 2011; 93 RJT Wilson (pone.0226480.ref060) 2019; 123 AM Nugent (pone.0226480.ref044) 1998; 167 RJT Wilson (pone.0226480.ref032) 2010; 105 S Lam (pone.0226480.ref036) 2019; 166 RA Hartley (pone.0226480.ref029) 2012; 99 LD Maxim (pone.0226480.ref013) 2014; 26 TEF Abbott (pone.0226480.ref041) 2019; 123 SMS Ting (pone.0226480.ref034) 2013; 8 MA West (pone.0226480.ref054) 2014; 112 |
| References_xml | – volume: 116 start-page: 177 year: 2016 ident: pone.0226480.ref016 article-title: Role of cardiopulmonary exercise testing as a risk-assessment method in patients undergoing intra-abdominal surgery: a systematic review publication-title: Br J Anaesth doi: 10.1093/bja/aev454 – volume: 99 start-page: 1097 year: 2012 ident: pone.0226480.ref033 article-title: Cardiopulmonary exercise testing for preoperative risk assessment before hepatic resection publication-title: Br J Surg doi: 10.1002/bjs.8773 – volume: 101 start-page: 774 year: 2008 ident: pone.0226480.ref047 article-title: Assessing fitness for surgery: A comparison of questionnaire, incremental shuttle walk, and cardiopulmonary exercise testing in general surgical patients publication-title: Br J Anaesth doi: 10.1093/bja/aen310 – volume: 257 start-page: 999 year: 2013 ident: pone.0226480.ref035 article-title: Cardiorespiratory Fitness predicts mortality and hospital length of stay after major elective surgery in older people publication-title: Ann Surg doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31828dbac2 – volume: 112 start-page: 491 year: 2014 ident: pone.0226480.ref039 article-title: Comparison of the prognostic accuracy of scoring systems, cardiopulmonary exercise testing, and plasma biomarkers: a single-centre observational pilot study publication-title: Br J Anaesth doi: 10.1093/bja/aet346 – volume: 123 start-page: 238 year: 2019 ident: pone.0226480.ref060 article-title: Ventilatory inefficiency adversely affects outcomes and longer-term survival after planned colorectal cancer surgery publication-title: Br J Anaesth doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.01.032 – volume: 93 start-page: 474 year: 2011 ident: pone.0226480.ref049 article-title: Cardiopulmonary exercise testing provides a predictive tool for early and late outcomes in abdominal aortic aneurysm patients publication-title: Ann R Coll Surg Engl doi: 10.1308/003588411X587235 – volume: 391 start-page: 2631 year: 2018 ident: pone.0226480.ref040 article-title: Assessment of functional capacity before major non-cardiac surgery: an international, prospective cohort study publication-title: Lancet doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31131-0 – volume: 110 start-page: 439 year: 2014 ident: pone.0226480.ref024 article-title: Cardiopulmonary exercise testing before liver surgery publication-title: J Surg Oncol doi: 10.1002/jso.23670 – volume: 167 start-page: 238 year: 1998 ident: pone.0226480.ref044 article-title: Cardiopulmonary exercise testing in the pre-operative assessment of patients for repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm publication-title: Ir J Med Sc doi: 10.1007/BF02937421 – volume: 112 start-page: E13 year: 2013 ident: pone.0226480.ref053 article-title: Impaired cardiopulmonary reserve in an elderly population is related to postoperative morbidity and length of hospital stay after radical cystectomy publication-title: BJU Int doi: 10.1111/bju.12219 – volume: 104 start-page: 701 year: 1993 ident: pone.0226480.ref005 article-title: Preoperative evaluation of cardiac failure and ischemia in elderly patients by cardiopulmonary exercise testing publication-title: Chest doi: 10.1378/chest.104.3.701 – volume: 54 start-page: 212 year: 2017 ident: pone.0226480.ref059 article-title: Prognostic markers of outcome in patients undergoing infra-inguinal revascularisation: A prospective observational pilot study publication-title: Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.05.005 – volume: 121 start-page: 730 year: 2018 ident: pone.0226480.ref012 article-title: Cancelled operations: a 7-day cohort study of planned adult inpatient surgery in 245 UK National Health Service hospitals publication-title: Br J Anaesth doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.07.002 – volume: 21 start-page: 128 year: 2010 ident: pone.0226480.ref019 article-title: Assessing the performance of prediction models: a framework for traditional and novel measures publication-title: Epidemiology doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181c30fb2 – volume: 11 start-page: e1001744 year: 2014 ident: pone.0226480.ref020 article-title: Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies: The CHARMS Checklist publication-title: PLoS Med doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001744 – volume: 44 start-page: 796 year: 2016 ident: pone.0226480.ref017 article-title: Systematic review: pre- and post-operative prognostic value of cardiopulmonary exercise testing in liver transplant cadidates publication-title: Aliment Pharmacol Ther doi: 10.1111/apt.13771 – volume: 105 start-page: 297 year: 2010 ident: pone.0226480.ref032 article-title: Impaired functional capacity is associated with all-cause mortality after major elective intra-abdominal surgery publication-title: Br J Anaesth doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq128 – volume: 2 start-page: 37 year: 2011 ident: pone.0226480.ref023 article-title: Evaluation: From precision, recall and F-Measure to ROC, Informedness, Markedness and Correlation publication-title: J Mach Learn Technol – volume: 78 start-page: 24 year: 2008 ident: pone.0226480.ref028 article-title: Simplified risk stratification in elective colorectal surgery publication-title: ANZ J Surg doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2007.04351.x – volume: 2 start-page: 4 year: 2013 ident: pone.0226480.ref009 article-title: Preoperative cardiopulmonary exercise testing in England—a national survey publication-title: Perioper Med doi: 10.1186/2047-0525-2-4 – ident: pone.0226480.ref014 – volume: 14 start-page: S53 year: 2017 ident: pone.0226480.ref007 article-title: Prognostic role of cardiopulmonary exercise testing in clinical practice publication-title: Ann Am Thorac Soc doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201610-818FR – volume: 289 start-page: 2554 year: 2003 ident: pone.0226480.ref043 article-title: Composite outcomes in randomised trials. Greater precision but with greater uncertainty? publication-title: JAMA doi: 10.1001/jama.289.19.2554 – volume: 40 start-page: 1421 year: 2014 ident: pone.0226480.ref055 article-title: The effects of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy on physical fitness and morbidity in rectal cancer surgery patients publication-title: Eur J Surg Oncol doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2014.03.021 – ident: pone.0226480.ref010 – volume: 158 start-page: 280 year: 2013 ident: pone.0226480.ref022 article-title: Assessing bias in studies of prognostic factors publication-title: Ann Intern Med doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-4-201302190-00009 – volume: 21 start-page: 1929 year: 2014 ident: pone.0226480.ref038 article-title: Cardiopulmonary exercise testing for preoperative risk assessment before pancreticoduodenectomy for cancer publication-title: Ann Surg Oncol doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3493-0 – volume: 999 start-page: 1290 year: 2012 ident: pone.0226480.ref026 article-title: Effects of low cardiopulmonary reserve on pancreatic leak following pancreaticoduodenectomy publication-title: Br J Surg doi: 10.1002/bjs.8859 – volume: 8 start-page: e64335 year: 2013 ident: pone.0226480.ref034 article-title: Reduced functional measure of cardiovascular reserve predicts admission to critical care unit following kidney transplantation publication-title: PLoS One doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064335 – volume: 85 start-page: 294 year: 2008 ident: pone.0226480.ref046 article-title: Is cardiopulmonary exercise testing a useful test before esophagectomy publication-title: Ann Thorac Surg doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.05.062 – volume: 111 start-page: 607 year: 2013 ident: pone.0226480.ref051 article-title: Patients’ inability to perform a preoperative cardiopulmonary exercise test or demonstrate an anaesrobic threshold is associated with inferior outcomes after major colorectal surgery publication-title: Br J Anaesth doi: 10.1093/bja/aet193 – volume: 116 start-page: 355 year: 1999 ident: pone.0226480.ref006 article-title: Cardiopulmonary exercise testing as a screening test for perioperative management of major surgery in the elderly publication-title: Chest doi: 10.1378/chest.116.2.355 – volume: 32 start-page: 88 year: 2015 ident: pone.0226480.ref021 article-title: Standards for definitions and use of outcome measures for clinical effectiveness research in perioperative medicine: European Perioperative Clinical Outcome (EPCO) definitions publication-title: Eur J Anaesthesiol doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000118 – volume: 103 start-page: 744 year: 2016 ident: pone.0226480.ref058 article-title: Validation of preoperative cardiopulmonary exercise testing-derived variables to predict in-hospital morbidity after major colorectal surgery publication-title: Br J Surg doi: 10.1002/bjs.10112 – volume: 100 start-page: 515 year: 2018 ident: pone.0226480.ref025 article-title: Routine pre- and post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy fitness testing is not indicated for oesophagogastric cancer surgery publication-title: Ann R Coll Surg Engl doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2018.0067 – volume: 122 start-page: 191 year: 2010 ident: pone.0226480.ref004 article-title: Clinician’s guide to cardiopulmonary exercise testing in adults: A scientific statement from the American heart association publication-title: Circulation doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e3181e52e69 – volume: 123 start-page: 17 year: 2019 ident: pone.0226480.ref041 article-title: Chronotropic incompetence and myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery: planned secondary analysis of a prospective observational international cohort study publication-title: Br J Anaesth doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.03.022 – ident: pone.0226480.ref011 – volume: 44 start-page: 64 year: 2012 ident: pone.0226480.ref018 article-title: A systematic review of the role of cardiopulmonary exercise testing in vascular surgery publication-title: Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2012.03.022 – volume: 2 start-page: 161 year: 2014 ident: pone.0226480.ref042 article-title: How to estimate the positive predictive value publication-title: Neuro-Oncology Pract – volume: 8 start-page: 1 year: 2018 ident: pone.0226480.ref002 article-title: Risk Assessment publication-title: Curr Anesthesiol Rep doi: 10.1007/s40140-018-0246-9 – volume: 120 start-page: 419 year: 2018 ident: pone.0226480.ref008 article-title: Improving the evidence-base for preoperative cardiopulmonary exercise testing publication-title: Br J Anaesth doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2017.12.007 – volume: 121 start-page: 1064 year: 2001 ident: pone.0226480.ref037 article-title: Preoperative evaluation of cardiopulmonary reserve with the use of expired gas analysis during exercise testing in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus publication-title: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg doi: 10.1067/mtc.2001.113596 – ident: pone.0226480.ref001 – volume: 26 start-page: 811 year: 2014 ident: pone.0226480.ref013 article-title: Screening tests: a review with examples publication-title: Inhal Toxicol doi: 10.3109/08958378.2014.955932 – volume: 2 start-page: 10 year: 2013 ident: pone.0226480.ref030 article-title: Risk stratification by pre-operative cardiopulmonary exercise testing improves outcomes following elective abdominal arotic aneurysm surgery: a cohort surgery publication-title: Perioper Med doi: 10.1186/2047-0525-2-10 – volume: 130 start-page: 517 year: 2006 ident: pone.0226480.ref045 article-title: Cardiorespiratory fitness and short-term complications after bariatric surgery publication-title: Chest doi: 10.1378/chest.130.2.517 – volume: 99 start-page: 1539 year: 2012 ident: pone.0226480.ref029 article-title: Preoperative cardiopulmonary exercise testing and risk of early mortality following abdominal aortic aneurysm repair publication-title: Br J Surg doi: 10.1002/bjs.8896 – volume: 18 start-page: 578 year: 2015 ident: pone.0226480.ref056 article-title: The impact of cardiopulmonary exercise testing on patients over the age of 80 undergoing elective colorectal cancer surgery publication-title: Colorectal Dis doi: 10.1111/codi.13139 – volume: 112 start-page: 665 year: 2014 ident: pone.0226480.ref054 article-title: Cardiopulmonary exercise variables are associated with postoperative morbidity after major colonic surgery: a prospective blinded observational study publication-title: Br J Anaesth doi: 10.1093/bja/aet408 – volume: 166 start-page: 28 year: 2019 ident: pone.0226480.ref036 article-title: The association between preoperative cardiopulmonary exercise-test variables and short-term morbidity after esophagectomy: A hospital-based cohort study publication-title: Surgery doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.02.001 – volume: 47 start-page: 324 year: 2015 ident: pone.0226480.ref057 article-title: Cardiopulmonary exercise testing versus spirometry as predictors of cardiopulmonary complications after colorectal surgery publication-title: Eur Surg doi: 10.1007/s10353-015-0359-z – volume: 10 start-page: 33 year: 2010 ident: pone.0226480.ref003 article-title: Preoperative cardiopulmonary exercise testing Contin Educ Anaesthesia publication-title: Crit Care Pain – volume: 15 start-page: 899 year: 2013 ident: pone.0226480.ref050 article-title: Pre-operative cardiopulmonary exercise testing predicxts adverse post-operative events and non-progression to adjuvant therapy after major pancreatic surgery publication-title: HPB doi: 10.1111/hpb.12060 – volume: 13 start-page: 603 year: 2016 ident: pone.0226480.ref015 article-title: Classification evaluation publication-title: Nat Methods doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3945 – volume: 70 start-page: 679 year: 2015 ident: pone.0226480.ref027 article-title: Prediction of organ-specific complications following abdominal aortic aneurysm repair using cardiopulmonary exercise testing publication-title: Anaesthesia doi: 10.1111/anae.12986 – volume: 95 start-page: 125 year: 2013 ident: pone.0226480.ref052 article-title: Cardiopulmonary exercise testing as a predictor of complications in oesophagogastric cancer surgery publication-title: Ann R Coll Surg Engl doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2013.95.2.125 – volume: 44 start-page: 594 year: 2018 ident: pone.0226480.ref031 article-title: Poor performance in incremental shuttle walk and cardiopulmonary exercise testing predicts poor overall survival for patients undergoing esophago-gastric resection publication-title: Eur J Surg Oncol doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.01.242 – volume: 251 start-page: 535 year: 2010 ident: pone.0226480.ref048 article-title: Submaximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing predicts complications and hospital length of stay in patients undergoing major elective surgery publication-title: Ann Surg doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181cf811d |
| SSID | ssj0053866 |
| Score | 2.487669 |
| SecondaryResourceType | review_article |
| Snippet | Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is widely used within the United Kingdom for preoperative risk stratification. Despite this, CPET's performance in... Introduction Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is widely used within the United Kingdom for preoperative risk stratification. Despite this, CPET's... Introduction Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is widely used within the United Kingdom for preoperative risk stratification. Despite this, CPET’s... IntroductionCardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is widely used within the United Kingdom for preoperative risk stratification. Despite this, CPET's... Introduction Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is widely used within the United Kingdom for preoperative risk stratification. Despite this, CPET’s... |
| SourceID | plos doaj pubmedcentral proquest gale pubmed crossref |
| SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
| StartPage | e0226480 |
| SubjectTerms | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Anaerobic threshold Anaerobic Threshold - physiology Area Under Curve Biology and Life Sciences Calibration Classifiers Complications Critical care Decision making Exercise Test - methods Female Hospitals Humans Identification methods Intensive care Male Medical Subject Headings-MeSH Medicine Medicine and Health Sciences Middle Aged Mortality Mortality risk Patients Performance prediction Physical Sciences Population studies Postoperative Complications - epidemiology Prediction models Prejudice Preoperative Care - methods Prognosis Research and Analysis Methods Risk Risk Assessment - methods Sensitivity Surgery United Kingdom United Kingdom - epidemiology Young Adult |
| SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELbQigMXRHl1YQGDkIBD2sSOnTW3BVGBhErFo-otcmynrLRKos0uEn-E38tM7KSbqlI5cI2_RMnMeOyJZ74h5CWDkKFwpY4sL7IoVWUaFYqrCLlOrIMFKuv-Q55-zo6P52dn6mSn1RfmhHl6YC-4w5KVscqci7XWqZZSCZW60sbGiTRTRcdeCruePpjyPhhmsZShUI5nyWHQy0FTV-4gxtpRpIHcWYg6vv7BK0-aVd1eteW8nDm5sxQd3SG3wx6SLvy775EbrrpL9sIsbenrQCX95h75c3JRF0Drkpou-7TZrsD49Po37Rsu0Q2SbVTnFMAUtoS0WeMBDioNb2vqdhPVjfMs4XSUhk6XFa0AdvnRra-3fksX9IItmvpKmfvkx9GH7-8_RqETQ2SkYpsIJjln2qaxVtbqhCWghjnjTgvheFwY7ZgApz_HcMo4Lri0pVUGW19JLSAOfkAm8Cpun1CmmRXKWQZeONWFUbZwyJXMZZkUiYunhPdqyU2gKcduGau8O3vLIFzxUs5RmXlQ5pREw12Np-m4Bv8ONT5gkWS7uwCmlwfTy68zvSl5hvaS-4rVwVXkC9gi4Qm7SKfkRYdAoo0KM3nO9bZt809fTv8B9O3rCPQqgMoaxGF0qJ6Ab0ICrxFyNkKCuzCj4X207l4qbc64wEo2nsL3zHqLv3r4-TCMD8XsvMrVW4-BuF0xwDz0E2SQLGfIGihhJBtNnZHoxyPV8mfHcy4hFp_H6aP_oavH5BbDPyWYb89nZLJZb90TctP82izb9dPOefwFqAx5gg priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – databaseName: Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access dbid: FPL link: http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3fb9MwELZQQYgXYAO2QgGDkICHjNSOnZq3gqhAGqPix7S3yLGdUalKoiZF4h_h7-UucVNSbQJe48-WffadffHdZ0KeMXAZUpfpwPI0DiKVRUGquAqQ68Q62KDi5j_k6XF8cjI5O1PzraO4c4PP4_ErL9OjssjdUYh5nxNw0a8yLiWGcM3mxxvLC7orpU-Pu6xmb_tpWPo7Wzwol0V10UFzN17yjw1odut_u36b3PRHTTpt18YeueLyfXL9o79M3yd7Xq8r-sKTT7-8Q37Nt5kEtMioaeJVy_USlqte_aSbJ5pojfQc-TkFMIVDJC1X2DBOM1Yri6oOitK1vOK0F7hOFznNAbbbdNVmaL-mU7rll6Ztbs1d8m327uvb94F_uyEwUrE6ALPAmbZRqJW1eszGUokJ404L4XiYGu2YgG1igg6YcVxwaTOrDD6WJbUAz_keGUBX3CGhTDMrlLMM7HakU6Ns6pBdmctsnI5dOCR8M6WJ8cTm-L7GMmlu62JwcFqBJzgPiZ-HIQm6WmVL7PEX_BtcLR0WabmbDzDhidfyJGNZqGLnQq11pCWMWUUus6FxIopVKobkMa61pM1x7YxLMoVDFd7Ji2hInjYIpObIMfbnXK-rKvnw6fQfQF8-90DPPSgrQBxG-3wLGBNSfvWQox4SDIzpFR-iZmykUiWMC8x94xGMZ7TRlouLn3TF2CjG8-WuWLcY8PQVA8xBq1ydZDlDnkEJJXFP7Xqi75fki-8NM7oE730SRvcv7_EDcoPhHxOMu-cjMqhXa_eQXDM_6kW1etSYk9-jO3gp priority: 102 providerName: Public Library of Science |
| Title | Performance of cardiopulmonary exercise testing for the prediction of post-operative complications in non cardiopulmonary surgery: A systematic review |
| URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32012165 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2350319345 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2350899925 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC6996804 https://doaj.org/article/f2f097ee0aaa4a669594efd0ce5479b5 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226480 |
| Volume | 15 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos000534615800004&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVAON databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals customDbUrl: eissn: 1932-6203 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0053866 issn: 1932-6203 databaseCode: DOA dateStart: 20060101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.doaj.org/ providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – providerCode: PRVHPJ databaseName: ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources customDbUrl: eissn: 1932-6203 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0053866 issn: 1932-6203 databaseCode: M~E dateStart: 20060101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://road.issn.org providerName: ISSN International Centre – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database customDbUrl: eissn: 1932-6203 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0053866 issn: 1932-6203 databaseCode: P5Z dateStart: 20061201 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/hightechjournals providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Agricultural Science Database customDbUrl: eissn: 1932-6203 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0053866 issn: 1932-6203 databaseCode: M0K dateStart: 20061201 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/agriculturejournals providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Biological Science Database customDbUrl: eissn: 1932-6203 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0053866 issn: 1932-6203 databaseCode: M7P dateStart: 20061201 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://search.proquest.com/biologicalscijournals providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Engineering Database customDbUrl: eissn: 1932-6203 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0053866 issn: 1932-6203 databaseCode: M7S dateStart: 20061201 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://search.proquest.com providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Environmental Science Database customDbUrl: eissn: 1932-6203 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0053866 issn: 1932-6203 databaseCode: PATMY dateStart: 20061201 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://search.proquest.com/environmentalscience providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Health & Medical Collection customDbUrl: eissn: 1932-6203 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0053866 issn: 1932-6203 databaseCode: 7X7 dateStart: 20061201 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/healthcomplete providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Materials Science Database customDbUrl: eissn: 1932-6203 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0053866 issn: 1932-6203 databaseCode: KB. dateStart: 20061201 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://search.proquest.com/materialsscijournals providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Nursing & Allied Health Database customDbUrl: eissn: 1932-6203 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0053866 issn: 1932-6203 databaseCode: 7RV dateStart: 20061201 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/nahs providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: ProQuest Central customDbUrl: eissn: 1932-6203 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0053866 issn: 1932-6203 databaseCode: BENPR dateStart: 20061201 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.proquest.com/central providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: ProQuest Public Health Database customDbUrl: eissn: 1932-6203 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0053866 issn: 1932-6203 databaseCode: 8C1 dateStart: 20061201 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/publichealth providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: ProQuest Publicly Available Content Database customDbUrl: eissn: 1932-6203 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0053866 issn: 1932-6203 databaseCode: PIMPY dateStart: 20061201 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://search.proquest.com/publiccontent providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVATS databaseName: Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access customDbUrl: eissn: 1932-6203 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0053866 issn: 1932-6203 databaseCode: FPL dateStart: 20060101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://www.plos.org/publications/ providerName: Public Library of Science |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3db9MwELfYhhAvwMbHCqMYhAQ8ZEvtOIl5Qeu0iWkfRBurCi-RkzijUpWEpkXiH-Hv5S5x0mWaAImXe4jPVmzfnX323c-EvGbgMkQ6VVbCI89yZOpYkeTSQqyTRMMC5VXnkKNj7_TUH49lYA7cShNW2djEylAneYxn5DuMC0y44Y74UHy38NUovF01T2iskDVESUDFDMTXxhKDLruuSZfj3mDHzM52kWd628YMUgSDvLIcVaj9rW1eLaZ5edPG83r85JUF6eD-_3blAblntqJ0t5addXJLZxvkzom5bN8g60bvS_rWgFO_e0h-BctMA5qnNK7iWYvFFBpVs5-0ecKJzhG-I7ukwExhk0mLGTaMYoDVirycW3mha9xx2glsp5OMZsB2vemyzuB-T3fpEn-a1rk3j8jFwf7nvY-WedvBil3J5haYDc5U4thKJomCyXOl8BnXSgjN7ShWmglYRnx00GLNBXeTNJExPqblKgGe9WOyCr-iNwlliiVC6oSBXXdUFMsk0oi-zN10EA203SO8meIwNsDn-P7GNKxu8zxwgOoBD1EwQiMYPWK1tYoa-OMv_EOUnpYXYburD_nsMjRWIExZaktPa1sp5SgX-iwdnSZ2rIXjyUj0yAuUvbDOgW2NT7gLmy68sxdOj7yqOBC6I8PYoEu1KMvw8NPoH5jOzzpMbwxTmsNwxMrkY0CfEBKsw7nV4QQDFHeKN1FTmlEpw6V8Q81GA24uftkWY6MY75fpfFHz-OC7MOB5UitbO7KcIQ6hCyVeRw07Q98tySbfKuR0F7x733ae_vm3npG7DE9VMDafb5HV-Wyhn5Pb8Y_5pJz1yYp3NkI69irqA_X3Bn2yNtw_Dc761akO0IPgGOjRcBvoiX2E1Asqet6vzBTUCA5Pgi-_AUpelnU |
| linkProvider | ProQuest |
| linkToHtml | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMw1V1fb9MwELdGQcALsPFnhcEMAgEP2VI7TmokhMqfadW6Mo0x9S04iVMqVUloWtC-CB-Dz8hd4qTLNAEve-C1_tlKrndnn3P3O0KeMggZAh0rK-KBZzkydqxAcmkh10mkYYPyinvI44E3HHZHI3mwQn5VtTCYVln5xMJRR2mId-TbjAssuOGOeJN9s7BrFH5drVpolGqxp09-QMiWv-6_h__3GWM7H47e7Vqmq4AVupLNLVBYzlTk2EpGkeqwjitFl3GthNDcDkKlmQAH1sXQINRccDeKIxliGydXCYjpYN1L5DL4cQ9TyLxRHeCB73BdU57Hvc620YatLE30lo0Vq0g-eWr7K7oE1HtBK5um-XkH3bP5mqc2wJ2b_5vobpEb5qhNe6VtrJIVnayRq_smmWCNrBq_ltMXhnz75W3y82BZSUHTmIZFvm62mMJLqNkJrVpU0TnSkyRjCmAKh2iazXBhVHOclqX53EozXfKq00biPp0kNAHY2aXzskL9Fe3RJb82LWuL7pDPFyKqu6QFj6LXCWWKRULqiMG-5agglFGgkV2au3En6Gi7TXilUn5oiN2xv8jUL75WehDglQL3URF9o4htYtWzspLY5C_4t6itNRZpyYsf0tnYN17Oj1lsS09rWynlKBfeWTo6juxQC8eTgWiTTdR1v6zxrZ2r34NDJeYkCKdNnhQIpCZJMPdprBZ57vc_Hv8D6NNhA_TcgOIUxBEqU28C74SUZw3kRgMJDjZsDK-jZVZSyf2lPcHMyuLOH35cD-OimM-Y6HRRYroQmzHA3CuNu5YsZ8iz6MKI1zD7huibI8nka8EM70rpdm3n_p8fa5Nc2z3aH_iD_nDvAbnO8AYJ6xD4BmnNZwv9kFwJv88n-exR4d4o-XLRTuE3toHlKQ |
| linkToPdf | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMw1V1fb9MwELdGQRMvwMafFQYzCAQ8ZE3tOKmRECqMimqjVPyZJl6CkzilUpWEpgXti_Bh-HTcJU66TBPwsgde67OVXM-_8zl3vyPkIYOQIdCxsiIeeJYjY8cKJJcWcp1EGhyUV9xDHh54o1Hv6EiO18ivqhYG0yorTCyAOkpDvCPvMC6w4IY7ohObtIjx3uBF9s3CDlL4pbVqp1GayL4-_gHhW_58uAf_9SPGBq8_vnpjmQ4DVuhKtrDAeDlTkWMrGUWqy7quFD3GtRJCczsIlWYCwKyHYUKoueBuFEcyxJZOrhIQ38G6F8hFD2JMDPzG4nPlBQBHXNeU6nGv2zGWsZulid61sXoViShPuMKiY0DtF1rZLM3POvSezt084QwHV_9nNV4jV8wRnPbLPbNB1nSySdbfmiSDTbJh8C6nTwwp99Pr5Od4VWFB05iGRR5vtpzBS6j5Ma1aV9EF0pYkEwrCFA7XNJvjwmj-OC1L84WVZrrkW6eNhH46TWgCYqeXzsvK9We0T1e827SsObpBPp2Lqm6SFjyK3iKUKRYJqSMG_sxRQSijQCPrNHfjbtDVdpvwyrz80BC-Y9-RmV98xfQg8CsV7qNR-sYo28SqZ2Ul4clf5F-i5daySFde_JDOJ75BPz9msS09rW2llKNceGfp6DiyQy0cTwaiTXbQ7v2y9rcGXb8Ph03MVRBOmzwoJJCyJEGrnahlnvvDd4f_IPThfUPosRGKU1BHqEwdCrwTUqE1JLcbkgC8YWN4C3dppZXcX-0tmFntvrOH79fDuCjmOSY6XZYyPYjZGMjcKjd6rVnOkH_RhRGvAQEN1TdHkunXgjHeldLt2c7tPz_WDlkHLPAPhqP9O-Qyw4slLE_g26S1mC_1XXIp_L6Y5vN7BdJR8uW8MeE37RDuHA |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Performance+of+cardiopulmonary+exercise+testing+for+the+prediction+of+post-operative+complications+in+non+cardiopulmonary+surgery%3A+A+systematic+review&rft.jtitle=PloS+one&rft.au=Stubbs%2C+Daniel+J&rft.au=Grimes%2C+Lisa+A&rft.au=Ercole%2C+Ari&rft.au=Kovacs%2C+Gabor&rft.date=2020-02-03&rft.pub=Public+Library+of+Science&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=e0226480&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0226480&rft.externalDocID=A613103954 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1932-6203&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1932-6203&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1932-6203&client=summon |