Quality Assessment of Studies Published in Open Access and Subscription Journals: Results of a Systematic Evaluation

Along with the proliferation of Open Access (OA) publishing, the interest for comparing the scientific quality of studies published in OA journals versus subscription journals has also increased. With our study we aimed to compare the methodological quality and the quality of reporting of primary ep...

Celý popis

Uložené v:

Podrobná bibliografia
Vydané v:	PloS one Ročník 11; číslo 5; s. e0154217
Hlavní autori:	Pastorino, Roberta, Milovanovic, Sonja, Stojanovic, Jovana, Efremov, Ljupcho, Amore, Rosarita, Boccia, Stefania
Médium:	Journal Article
Jazyk:	English
Vydavateľské údaje:	United States Public Library of Science 11.05.2016 Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Predmet:	Adhesion Analysis Bibliometrics Cohort analysis Epidemiologic Studies Epidemiology Evaluation Humans Identification methods Journal Impact Factor Medicine and Health Sciences Meta-analysis Meta-Analysis as Topic Nitric-oxide synthase Observational studies Open access journals Open access publishing Open Access Publishing - ethics Open Access Publishing - standards Peer Review, Research - ethics Peer Review, Research - standards Periodicals as Topic - ethics Periodicals as Topic - standards Physical Sciences Publishing industry Quality assessment Quality Control Quality management Research and Analysis Methods Research Design Reviews Scholarly publishing Science Policy Studies Systematic review Italy
ISSN:	1932-6203, 1932-6203
On-line prístup:	Získať plný text
Tagy:	Pridať tag Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!

Buďte prvý, kto okomentuje tento záznam!