Quality Assessment of Studies Published in Open Access and Subscription Journals: Results of a Systematic Evaluation
Along with the proliferation of Open Access (OA) publishing, the interest for comparing the scientific quality of studies published in OA journals versus subscription journals has also increased. With our study we aimed to compare the methodological quality and the quality of reporting of primary ep...
Uloženo v:
| Vydáno v: | PloS one Ročník 11; číslo 5; s. e0154217 |
|---|---|
| Hlavní autoři: | , , , , , |
| Médium: | Journal Article |
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Vydáno: |
United States
Public Library of Science
11.05.2016
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| Témata: | |
| ISSN: | 1932-6203, 1932-6203 |
| On-line přístup: | Získat plný text |
| Tagy: |
Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
|
| Abstract | Along with the proliferation of Open Access (OA) publishing, the interest for comparing the scientific quality of studies published in OA journals versus subscription journals has also increased. With our study we aimed to compare the methodological quality and the quality of reporting of primary epidemiological studies and systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in OA and non-OA journals.
In order to identify the studies to appraise, we listed all OA and non-OA journals which published in 2013 at least one primary epidemiologic study (case-control or cohort study design), and at least one systematic review or meta-analysis in the field of oncology. For the appraisal, we picked up the first studies published in 2013 with case-control or cohort study design from OA journals (Group A; n = 12), and in the same time period from non-OA journals (Group B; n = 26); the first systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in 2013 from OA journals (Group C; n = 15), and in the same time period from non-OA journals (Group D; n = 32). We evaluated the methodological quality of studies by assessing the compliance of case-control and cohort studies to Newcastle and Ottawa Scale (NOS) scale, and the compliance of systematic reviews and meta-analyses to Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) scale. The quality of reporting was assessed considering the adherence of case-control and cohort studies to STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) checklist, and the adherence of systematic reviews and meta-analyses to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) checklist.
Among case-control and cohort studies published in OA and non-OA journals, we did not observe significant differences in the median value of NOS score (Group A: 7 (IQR 7-8) versus Group B: 8 (7-9); p = 0.5) and in the adherence to STROBE checklist (Group A, 75% versus Group B, 80%; p = 0.1). The results did not change after adjustment for impact factor. The compliance with AMSTAR and adherence to PRISMA checklist were comparable between systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in OA and non-OA journals (Group C, 46.0% versus Group D, 55.0%; p = 0.06), (Group C, 72.0% versus Group D, 76.0%; p = 0.1), respectively).
The epidemiological studies published in OA journals in the field of oncology approach the same methodological quality and quality of reporting as studies published in non-OA journals. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Introduction Along with the proliferation of Open Access (OA) publishing, the interest for comparing the scientific quality of studies published in OA journals versus subscription journals has also increased. With our study we aimed to compare the methodological quality and the quality of reporting of primary epidemiological studies and systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in OA and non-OA journals. Methods In order to identify the studies to appraise, we listed all OA and non-OA journals which published in 2013 at least one primary epidemiologic study (case-control or cohort study design), and at least one systematic review or meta-analysis in the field of oncology. For the appraisal, we picked up the first studies published in 2013 with case-control or cohort study design from OA journals (Group A; n = 12), and in the same time period from non-OA journals (Group B; n = 26); the first systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in 2013 from OA journals (Group C; n = 15), and in the same time period from non-OA journals (Group D; n = 32). We evaluated the methodological quality of studies by assessing the compliance of case-control and cohort studies to Newcastle and Ottawa Scale (NOS) scale, and the compliance of systematic reviews and meta-analyses to Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) scale. The quality of reporting was assessed considering the adherence of case-control and cohort studies to STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) checklist, and the adherence of systematic reviews and meta-analyses to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) checklist. Results Among case-control and cohort studies published in OA and non-OA journals, we did not observe significant differences in the median value of NOS score (Group A: 7 (IQR 7–8) versus Group B: 8 (7–9); p = 0.5) and in the adherence to STROBE checklist (Group A, 75% versus Group B, 80%; p = 0.1). The results did not change after adjustment for impact factor. The compliance with AMSTAR and adherence to PRISMA checklist were comparable between systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in OA and non-OA journals (Group C, 46.0% versus Group D, 55.0%; p = 0.06), (Group C, 72.0% versus Group D, 76.0%; p = 0.1), respectively). Conclusion The epidemiological studies published in OA journals in the field of oncology approach the same methodological quality and quality of reporting as studies published in non-OA journals. Along with the proliferation of Open Access (OA) publishing, the interest for comparing the scientific quality of studies published in OA journals versus subscription journals has also increased. With our study we aimed to compare the methodological quality and the quality of reporting of primary epidemiological studies and systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in OA and non-OA journals. In order to identify the studies to appraise, we listed all OA and non-OA journals which published in 2013 at least one primary epidemiologic study (case-control or cohort study design), and at least one systematic review or meta-analysis in the field of oncology. For the appraisal, we picked up the first studies published in 2013 with case-control or cohort study design from OA journals (Group A; n = 12), and in the same time period from non-OA journals (Group B; n = 26); the first systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in 2013 from OA journals (Group C; n = 15), and in the same time period from non-OA journals (Group D; n = 32). We evaluated the methodological quality of studies by assessing the compliance of case-control and cohort studies to Newcastle and Ottawa Scale (NOS) scale, and the compliance of systematic reviews and meta-analyses to Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) scale. The quality of reporting was assessed considering the adherence of case-control and cohort studies to STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) checklist, and the adherence of systematic reviews and meta-analyses to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) checklist. Among case-control and cohort studies published in OA and non-OA journals, we did not observe significant differences in the median value of NOS score (Group A: 7 (IQR 7-8) versus Group B: 8 (7-9); p = 0.5) and in the adherence to STROBE checklist (Group A, 75% versus Group B, 80%; p = 0.1). The results did not change after adjustment for impact factor. The compliance with AMSTAR and adherence to PRISMA checklist were comparable between systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in OA and non-OA journals (Group C, 46.0% versus Group D, 55.0%; p = 0.06), (Group C, 72.0% versus Group D, 76.0%; p = 0.1), respectively). The epidemiological studies published in OA journals in the field of oncology approach the same methodological quality and quality of reporting as studies published in non-OA journals. Along with the proliferation of Open Access (OA) publishing, the interest for comparing the scientific quality of studies published in OA journals versus subscription journals has also increased. With our study we aimed to compare the methodological quality and the quality of reporting of primary epidemiological studies and systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in OA and non-OA journals. In order to identify the studies to appraise, we listed all OA and non-OA journals which published in 2013 at least one primary epidemiologic study (case-control or cohort study design), and at least one systematic review or meta-analysis in the field of oncology. For the appraisal, we picked up the first studies published in 2013 with case-control or cohort study design from OA journals (Group A; n = 12), and in the same time period from non-OA journals (Group B; n = 26); the first systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in 2013 from OA journals (Group C; n = 15), and in the same time period from non-OA journals (Group D; n = 32). We evaluated the methodological quality of studies by assessing the compliance of case-control and cohort studies to Newcastle and Ottawa Scale (NOS) scale, and the compliance of systematic reviews and meta-analyses to Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) scale. The quality of reporting was assessed considering the adherence of case-control and cohort studies to STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) checklist, and the adherence of systematic reviews and meta-analyses to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) checklist. Among case-control and cohort studies published in OA and non-OA journals, we did not observe significant differences in the median value of NOS score (Group A: 7 (IQR 7-8) versus Group B: 8 (7-9); p = 0.5) and in the adherence to STROBE checklist (Group A, 75% versus Group B, 80%; p = 0.1). The results did not change after adjustment for impact factor. The compliance with AMSTAR and adherence to PRISMA checklist were comparable between systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in OA and non-OA journals (Group C, 46.0% versus Group D, 55.0%; p = 0.06), (Group C, 72.0% versus Group D, 76.0%; p = 0.1), respectively). The epidemiological studies published in OA journals in the field of oncology approach the same methodological quality and quality of reporting as studies published in non-OA journals. INTRODUCTIONAlong with the proliferation of Open Access (OA) publishing, the interest for comparing the scientific quality of studies published in OA journals versus subscription journals has also increased. With our study we aimed to compare the methodological quality and the quality of reporting of primary epidemiological studies and systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in OA and non-OA journals.METHODSIn order to identify the studies to appraise, we listed all OA and non-OA journals which published in 2013 at least one primary epidemiologic study (case-control or cohort study design), and at least one systematic review or meta-analysis in the field of oncology. For the appraisal, we picked up the first studies published in 2013 with case-control or cohort study design from OA journals (Group A; n = 12), and in the same time period from non-OA journals (Group B; n = 26); the first systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in 2013 from OA journals (Group C; n = 15), and in the same time period from non-OA journals (Group D; n = 32). We evaluated the methodological quality of studies by assessing the compliance of case-control and cohort studies to Newcastle and Ottawa Scale (NOS) scale, and the compliance of systematic reviews and meta-analyses to Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) scale. The quality of reporting was assessed considering the adherence of case-control and cohort studies to STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) checklist, and the adherence of systematic reviews and meta-analyses to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) checklist.RESULTSAmong case-control and cohort studies published in OA and non-OA journals, we did not observe significant differences in the median value of NOS score (Group A: 7 (IQR 7-8) versus Group B: 8 (7-9); p = 0.5) and in the adherence to STROBE checklist (Group A, 75% versus Group B, 80%; p = 0.1). The results did not change after adjustment for impact factor. The compliance with AMSTAR and adherence to PRISMA checklist were comparable between systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in OA and non-OA journals (Group C, 46.0% versus Group D, 55.0%; p = 0.06), (Group C, 72.0% versus Group D, 76.0%; p = 0.1), respectively).CONCLUSIONThe epidemiological studies published in OA journals in the field of oncology approach the same methodological quality and quality of reporting as studies published in non-OA journals. Introduction Along with the proliferation of Open Access (OA) publishing, the interest for comparing the scientific quality of studies published in OA journals versus subscription journals has also increased. With our study we aimed to compare the methodological quality and the quality of reporting of primary epidemiological studies and systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in OA and non-OA journals. Methods In order to identify the studies to appraise, we listed all OA and non-OA journals which published in 2013 at least one primary epidemiologic study (case-control or cohort study design), and at least one systematic review or meta-analysis in the field of oncology. For the appraisal, we picked up the first studies published in 2013 with case-control or cohort study design from OA journals (Group A; n = 12), and in the same time period from non-OA journals (Group B; n = 26); the first systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in 2013 from OA journals (Group C; n = 15), and in the same time period from non-OA journals (Group D; n = 32). We evaluated the methodological quality of studies by assessing the compliance of case-control and cohort studies to Newcastle and Ottawa Scale (NOS) scale, and the compliance of systematic reviews and meta-analyses to Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) scale. The quality of reporting was assessed considering the adherence of case-control and cohort studies to STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) checklist, and the adherence of systematic reviews and meta-analyses to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) checklist. Results Among case-control and cohort studies published in OA and non-OA journals, we did not observe significant differences in the median value of NOS score (Group A: 7 (IQR 7–8) versus Group B: 8 (7–9); p = 0.5) and in the adherence to STROBE checklist (Group A, 75% versus Group B, 80%; p = 0.1). The results did not change after adjustment for impact factor. The compliance with AMSTAR and adherence to PRISMA checklist were comparable between systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in OA and non-OA journals (Group C, 46.0% versus Group D, 55.0%; p = 0.06), (Group C, 72.0% versus Group D, 76.0%; p = 0.1), respectively). Conclusion The epidemiological studies published in OA journals in the field of oncology approach the same methodological quality and quality of reporting as studies published in non-OA journals. |
| Audience | Academic |
| Author | Stojanovic, Jovana Boccia, Stefania Milovanovic, Sonja Amore, Rosarita Pastorino, Roberta Efremov, Ljupcho |
| AuthorAffiliation | 2 Studies Coordinating Centre, Research Unit Hypertension and Cardiovascular Epidemiology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium NIH—National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, UNITED STATES 3 Section of Hygiene—Institute of Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “Agostino Gemelli”, Rome, Italy 1 Section of Hygiene—Institute of Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy |
| AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: 1 Section of Hygiene—Institute of Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy – name: 3 Section of Hygiene—Institute of Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “Agostino Gemelli”, Rome, Italy – name: NIH—National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, UNITED STATES – name: 2 Studies Coordinating Centre, Research Unit Hypertension and Cardiovascular Epidemiology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Roberta surname: Pastorino fullname: Pastorino, Roberta – sequence: 2 givenname: Sonja surname: Milovanovic fullname: Milovanovic, Sonja – sequence: 3 givenname: Jovana surname: Stojanovic fullname: Stojanovic, Jovana – sequence: 4 givenname: Ljupcho surname: Efremov fullname: Efremov, Ljupcho – sequence: 5 givenname: Rosarita surname: Amore fullname: Amore, Rosarita – sequence: 6 givenname: Stefania surname: Boccia fullname: Boccia, Stefania |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27167982$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNqNk1tv0zAUxyM0xC7wDRBYmoTgocWXxEn2gFRNA4omFVbg1XJsp3XlxCW2J_rtcdoUtdOEUB4cHf_O_1x8znly0tpWJclLBMeI5Oj9yoau5Wa8juYxRFmKUf4kOUMlwSOKITk5-D9Nzp1bQZiRgtJnySnOEc3LAp8l_lvgRvsNmDinnGtU64GtwdwHqZUDX0NltFsqCXQLZmvVgokQkQO8lWAeKic6vfbatuDLLh13Be6UC8a7XoaD-cZ51XCvBbi55ybwHn6ePK0jql4M50Xy4-PN9-vPo9vZp-n15HYkaIn9iFLFaylSiXlRIJ6pjGZVDssaqkwWeV7FC0QkJhxCSlNY40wRXNaVrHmFIScXyeud7tpYx4aGOYbyosC4KCGKxHRHSMtXbN3phncbZrlmW4PtFox3MXmjGIKVkqLEOJUo5ZRUCtI6zXNMU8olklHrwxAtVE1EYys7bo5Ej29avWQLe8_SgqYko1Hg7SDQ2V9BOc8a7YQyhrfKhm3eJSRlmcKIXj5AH69uoBY8FqDb2sa4ohdlkzQjJIe7sONHqPhJ1WgRp6vW0X7k8O7IITJe_fYLHpxj0_nd_7Ozn8fsmwN2qbjxS2dN6EfGHYOvDjv9t8X7sY7A1Q4QnXWuUzUT2m9HL5amTXxL1u_Qvmms3yE27FB0Th847_X_6fYH0JIg5w |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1080_08820538_2023_2256838 crossref_primary_10_1080_02763869_2024_2373019 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jacr_2016_09_006 crossref_primary_10_2196_16532 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2018_028655 crossref_primary_10_1177_00034894211039627 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13063_019_3781_x crossref_primary_10_1080_08820538_2024_2333644 crossref_primary_10_5312_wjo_v8_i5_424 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jtos_2024_04_001 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12471_017_1064_2 crossref_primary_10_4103_sej_sej_56_24 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_physa_2019_122043 crossref_primary_10_1098_rsos_241248 crossref_primary_10_1136_flgastro_2018_101166 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13643_021_01845_9 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpurol_2018_08_019 crossref_primary_10_1097_PHM_0000000000002029 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11192_019_03265_y crossref_primary_10_1016_j_eclinm_2025_103154 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_joen_2017_07_019 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13643_017_0663_8 crossref_primary_10_1080_17435390_2023_2293141 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0169398 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ophtha_2022_09_017 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1007/s11999-014-3615-9 10.1002/asi.21532 10.1096/fj.11-183988 10.1136/bmj.39335.541782.AD 10.1111/inm.12098 10.1016/j.tplants.2014.01.005 10.1126/science.342.6154.60 10.1186/1471-2288-7-10 10.1186/1741-7015-10-73 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.04.033 10.1186/1756-9966-32-4 10.1186/1471-2288-6-42 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100 10.1038/454011a |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | COPYRIGHT 2016 Public Library of Science 2016 Pastorino et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. 2016 Pastorino et al 2016 Pastorino et al |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: COPYRIGHT 2016 Public Library of Science – notice: 2016 Pastorino et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. – notice: 2016 Pastorino et al 2016 Pastorino et al |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM IOV ISR 3V. 7QG 7QL 7QO 7RV 7SN 7SS 7T5 7TG 7TM 7U9 7X2 7X7 7XB 88E 8AO 8C1 8FD 8FE 8FG 8FH 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABJCF ABUWG AEUYN AFKRA ARAPS ATCPS AZQEC BBNVY BENPR BGLVJ BHPHI C1K CCPQU D1I DWQXO FR3 FYUFA GHDGH GNUQQ H94 HCIFZ K9. KB. KB0 KL. L6V LK8 M0K M0S M1P M7N M7P M7S NAPCQ P5Z P62 P64 PATMY PDBOC PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQGLB PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS PTHSS PYCSY RC3 7X8 5PM DOA |
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0154217 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints Gale In Context: Science ProQuest Central (Corporate) Animal Behavior Abstracts Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B) Biotechnology Research Abstracts Nursing & Allied Health Database Ecology Abstracts Entomology Abstracts (Full archive) Immunology Abstracts Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts Nucleic Acids Abstracts Virology and AIDS Abstracts Agricultural Science Collection Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Pharma Collection Public Health Database Technology Research Database ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Technology Collection ProQuest Natural Science Collection Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) Materials Science & Engineering Database ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest One Sustainability ProQuest Central UK/Ireland Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database Agricultural & Environmental Science Database ProQuest Central Essentials Biological Science Collection ProQuest Central Technology collection Natural Science Collection Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management ProQuest One ProQuest Materials Science Collection ProQuest Central Engineering Research Database Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central Student AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Materials Science Database Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition) Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic ProQuest Engineering Collection Biological Sciences Agricultural Science Database Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition) PML(ProQuest Medical Library) Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C) Biological Science Database Engineering Database Nursing & Allied Health Premium ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Environmental Science Database Materials Science Collection ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic (New) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Academic (retired) ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China Engineering collection Environmental Science Collection Genetics Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Agricultural Science Database Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Central Student ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection ProQuest Central Essentials Nucleic Acids Abstracts SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest Central China Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Sustainability Health Research Premium Collection Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts Natural Science Collection Health & Medical Research Collection Biological Science Collection ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) Engineering Collection Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection Engineering Database Virology and AIDS Abstracts ProQuest Biological Science Collection ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition Agricultural Science Collection ProQuest Hospital Collection ProQuest Technology Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) Biological Science Database Ecology Abstracts ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Environmental Science Collection Entomology Abstracts Nursing & Allied Health Premium ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Environmental Science Database ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source (Alumni) Engineering Research Database ProQuest One Academic Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) Technology Collection Technology Research Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) Materials Science Collection ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest Natural Science Collection ProQuest Pharma Collection ProQuest Central ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection Genetics Abstracts ProQuest Engineering Collection Biotechnology Research Abstracts Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B) Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C) Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts Materials Science Database ProQuest Materials Science Collection ProQuest Public Health ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source ProQuest SciTech Collection Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database ProQuest Medical Library Animal Behavior Abstracts Materials Science & Engineering Collection Immunology Abstracts ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | Agricultural Science Database MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: PIMPY name: Publicly Available Content Database url: http://search.proquest.com/publiccontent sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Sciences (General) |
| DocumentTitleAlternate | Quality Assessment of Studies in Open Access and Subscription Journals |
| EISSN | 1932-6203 |
| EndPage | e0154217 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 1788228901 oai_doaj_org_article_10bedc9224d14a63be06f4772646ad1d PMC4864356 4052720721 A453370356 27167982 10_1371_journal_pone_0154217 |
| Genre | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article |
| GeographicLocations | Italy |
| GeographicLocations_xml | – name: Italy |
| GroupedDBID | --- 123 29O 2WC 53G 5VS 7RV 7X2 7X7 7XC 88E 8AO 8C1 8CJ 8FE 8FG 8FH 8FI 8FJ A8Z AAFWJ AAUCC AAWOE AAYXX ABDBF ABIVO ABJCF ABUWG ACCTH ACGFO ACIHN ACIWK ACPRK ACUHS ADBBV ADRAZ AEAQA AENEX AEUYN AFFHD AFKRA AFPKN AFRAH AHMBA ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AOIJS APEBS ARAPS ATCPS BAIFH BAWUL BBNVY BBTPI BCNDV BENPR BGLVJ BHPHI BKEYQ BPHCQ BVXVI BWKFM CCPQU CITATION CS3 D1I D1J D1K DIK DU5 E3Z EAP EAS EBD EMOBN ESX EX3 F5P FPL FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HCIFZ HH5 HMCUK HYE IAO IEA IGS IHR IHW INH INR IOV IPY ISE ISR ITC K6- KB. KQ8 L6V LK5 LK8 M0K M1P M48 M7P M7R M7S M~E NAPCQ O5R O5S OK1 OVT P2P P62 PATMY PDBOC PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PPXIY PQGLB PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO PTHSS PV9 PYCSY RNS RPM RZL SV3 TR2 UKHRP WOQ WOW ~02 ~KM 3V. ALIPV BBORY CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF IPNFZ NPM RIG 7QG 7QL 7QO 7SN 7SS 7T5 7TG 7TM 7U9 7XB 8FD 8FK AZQEC C1K DWQXO ESTFP FR3 GNUQQ H94 K9. KL. M7N P64 PKEHL PQEST PQUKI PRINS RC3 7X8 PUEGO 5PM AAPBV ABPTK BBAFP |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-66eafdc4d2a881a5e565b709f0e5d877bd2a13d23a006640f25e329fbdfab20a3 |
| IEDL.DBID | 7RV |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 28 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000376587300082&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 1932-6203 |
| IngestDate | Sun Oct 02 00:11:08 EDT 2022 Fri Oct 03 12:37:49 EDT 2025 Tue Nov 04 02:05:21 EST 2025 Fri Sep 05 10:46:19 EDT 2025 Tue Oct 07 07:57:20 EDT 2025 Sat Nov 29 12:56:56 EST 2025 Sat Nov 29 10:18:56 EST 2025 Wed Nov 26 09:57:56 EST 2025 Wed Nov 26 10:12:28 EST 2025 Thu May 22 21:32:07 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 19 02:33:59 EST 2025 Sat Nov 29 01:53:39 EST 2025 Tue Nov 18 22:25:58 EST 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 5 |
| Language | English |
| License | This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Creative Commons Attribution License |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c692t-66eafdc4d2a881a5e565b709f0e5d877bd2a13d23a006640f25e329fbdfab20a3 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. Conceived and designed the experiments: RP SB. Performed the experiments: RA LE SM RP JS. Analyzed the data: RP. Wrote the paper: RP SB JS SM. |
| OpenAccessLink | https://www.proquest.com/docview/1788228901?pq-origsite=%requestingapplication% |
| PMID | 27167982 |
| PQID | 1788228901 |
| PQPubID | 1436336 |
| ParticipantIDs | plos_journals_1788228901 doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_10bedc9224d14a63be06f4772646ad1d pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4864356 proquest_miscellaneous_1789039940 proquest_journals_1788228901 gale_infotracmisc_A453370356 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A453370356 gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A453370356 gale_incontextgauss_IOV_A453370356 gale_healthsolutions_A453370356 pubmed_primary_27167982 crossref_citationtrail_10_1371_journal_pone_0154217 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0154217 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2016-05-11 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2016-05-11 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 05 year: 2016 text: 2016-05-11 day: 11 |
| PublicationDecade | 2010 |
| PublicationPlace | United States |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States – name: San Francisco – name: San Francisco, CA USA |
| PublicationTitle | PloS one |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | PLoS One |
| PublicationYear | 2016 |
| Publisher | Public Library of Science Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Public Library of Science – name: Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| References | D Butler (ref3) 2008; 454 A Liberati (ref21) 2009; 6 SS Leopold (ref5) 2014; 472 S Tzarnas (ref7) 2014 ref14 E Von Elm (ref20) 2007; 335 J Bohannon (ref10) 2013; 342 E Poltronieri (ref15) 2013; 32 ref2 ME McVeigh (ref13) 2004 M Crowe (ref16) 2015; 24 ref1 BJ Shea (ref19) 2007; 7 AA Agrawal (ref8) 2014; 19 ref18 J Carletta (ref22) 1996; 22 J Markovac (ref9) 2014 ref4 TJ Liesegang (ref6) 2013; 156 PM Davis (ref17) 2011; 25 P Nieminen (ref23) 2006; 6 S Miguel (ref11) 2011; 62 B-C Björk (ref12) 2012; 10 |
| References_xml | – ident: ref1 – ident: ref4 – volume: 472 start-page: 1665 year: 2014 ident: ref5 article-title: Editorial: Paying to publish—what is open access and why is it important? publication-title: Clin Orthop Relat Res doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3615-9 – year: 2014 ident: ref9 article-title: Making Sense of Open Access publication-title: Int J Neuropsychopharmacol – ident: ref2 – volume: 62 start-page: 1130 year: 2011 ident: ref11 article-title: Open access and Scopus: A new approach to scientific visibility from the standpoint of access publication-title: J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol doi: 10.1002/asi.21532 – volume: 25 start-page: 2129 year: 2011 ident: ref17 article-title: Open access, readership, citations: a randomized controlled trial of scientific journal publishing publication-title: FASEB J doi: 10.1096/fj.11-183988 – year: 2014 ident: ref7 article-title: Publish or Perish, and Pay-The New Paradigm of Open-Access Journals publication-title: J Surg Educ – volume: 335 start-page: 806 year: 2007 ident: ref20 article-title: Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies publication-title: BMJ doi: 10.1136/bmj.39335.541782.AD – start-page: 25 year: 2004 ident: ref13 – volume: 22 start-page: 249 year: 1996 ident: ref22 article-title: Assessing agreement on classification tasks: the kappa statistic publication-title: Comput Linguist – volume: 24 start-page: 59 year: 2015 ident: ref16 article-title: Is open access sufficient? A review of the quality of open-access nursing journals publication-title: Int J Ment Health Nurs doi: 10.1111/inm.12098 – volume: 19 start-page: 133 year: 2014 ident: ref8 article-title: Four more reasons to be skeptical of open-access publishing publication-title: Trends Plant Sci doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2014.01.005 – volume: 342 start-page: 60 year: 2013 ident: ref10 article-title: Who’s afraid of peer review? publication-title: Science doi: 10.1126/science.342.6154.60 – volume: 7 start-page: 10 year: 2007 ident: ref19 article-title: Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews publication-title: BMC Med Res Methodol doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-7-10 – volume: 10 start-page: 73 year: 2012 ident: ref12 article-title: Open access versus subscription journals: a comparison of scientific impact publication-title: BMC Med doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-10-73 – volume: 156 start-page: 423 year: 2013 ident: ref6 article-title: The continued movement for open access to peer-reviewed literature publication-title: Am J Ophthalmol doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.04.033 – volume: 32 start-page: 4 year: 2013 ident: ref15 article-title: Where on earth to publish? A sample survey comparing traditional and open access publishing in the oncological field publication-title: J Exp Clin Cancer Res doi: 10.1186/1756-9966-32-4 – ident: ref18 – volume: 6 start-page: 42 year: 2006 ident: ref23 article-title: The relationship between quality of research and citation frequency publication-title: BMC Med Res Methodol doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-6-42 – volume: 6 start-page: e1000100 year: 2009 ident: ref21 article-title: The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration publication-title: PLoS Med doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100 – volume: 454 start-page: 11 year: 2008 ident: ref3 article-title: PLoS stays afloat with bulk publishing publication-title: Nature doi: 10.1038/454011a – ident: ref14 |
| SSID | ssj0053866 |
| Score | 2.3401043 |
| Snippet | Along with the proliferation of Open Access (OA) publishing, the interest for comparing the scientific quality of studies published in OA journals versus... Introduction Along with the proliferation of Open Access (OA) publishing, the interest for comparing the scientific quality of studies published in OA journals... INTRODUCTIONAlong with the proliferation of Open Access (OA) publishing, the interest for comparing the scientific quality of studies published in OA journals... INTRODUCTION:Along with the proliferation of Open Access (OA) publishing, the interest for comparing the scientific quality of studies published in OA journals... Introduction Along with the proliferation of Open Access (OA) publishing, the interest for comparing the scientific quality of studies published in OA journals... |
| SourceID | plos doaj pubmedcentral proquest gale pubmed crossref |
| SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
| StartPage | e0154217 |
| SubjectTerms | Adhesion Analysis Bibliometrics Cohort analysis Epidemiologic Studies Epidemiology Evaluation Humans Identification methods Journal Impact Factor Medicine and Health Sciences Meta-analysis Meta-Analysis as Topic Nitric-oxide synthase Observational studies Open access journals Open access publishing Open Access Publishing - ethics Open Access Publishing - standards Peer Review, Research - ethics Peer Review, Research - standards Periodicals as Topic - ethics Periodicals as Topic - standards Physical Sciences Publishing industry Quality assessment Quality Control Quality management Research and Analysis Methods Research Design Reviews Scholarly publishing Science Policy Studies Systematic review |
| SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) dbid: DOA link: http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3fb9MwELZQxQMviPFrgQIGIQEPHbGT2AlvBW2Cl4E2QHuz7NgZlaqkWlKk_fe7c5zQoEnjgdfeNW3uznef5fN3hLzmGVZpjWfqLocNSsYWBi_7ADTNmUugwhX9sAl5fJyfnRXfdkZ9YU9YTw_cGw5WtXG2LKDSWJZqkRgXiyoFTChSoS2zmH1jWQybqT4HwyoWIlyUSyR7H_xysGlqd4CogfsBZX8KkefrH7PybLNu2usg59-dkzul6OgeuRswJF32_32P3HL1fbIXVmlL3wYq6XcPSNdTZFzS5UjASZuKhuZBOvTEW7qqKbaW0KWfn0h1beluSqHhN9sP9MS123XX4mM0PR15oOnhSBv-kPw4Ovz-6fMizFlYlKLg3UIIpytbppZrcJDOHIA8I-Oiil1mcykNCFhieaIRoKRxxTOX8KIyttKGxzp5RGY1WHaf0DzNTOa1oOwzZzSvJI9FWSUCcKhhEUkGo6sykJDjLIy18idrEjYj_fsodJUKrorIYvzWpifhuEH_I_pz1EUKbf8BBJYKgaVuCqyIvMBoUP191DERqGUKCBnyZCYi8sprII1GjX0653rbturL15__oHR6MlF6E5SqBsxR6nA3At4J6bkmmvOJJiSDciLex9gdrNIqJmELhYfJYPr5EM_Xi1-OYnwo9t7Vrtl6nSIGHJvGEXnch_9oWS79MR6PiJwsjInpp5J69cuzmKc5gOFMPPkfvnpK7gCQFdjVwdiczLqLrXtGbpe_u1V78dynhitKK2ir priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – databaseName: Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals (OA) dbid: FPL link: http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1Nb9QwELVg4cAFKF8NLGAQEnBIiZ3ETrgtqCuQUKlaQL1FduzASqtk1WSR-PfMOE5oqlbANTNxnLFn_EYePxPygqe4SivcU7cZJCgpCzUe9gFomjEbwwqX95dNyIOD7OQkP_yTKJ7bwY8le-NturdparuHKz6A6KvkGo-FwGRrefhpiLzgu0L443GXvTlZfhxL_xiLZ5t1014ENM_XS55ZgJa3_rfrt8lNDzXpop8bO-SKre-QHe_MLX3lGadf3yVdz6Txiy5Gnk7aVNTXGNKhdN7QVU2xAoUu3DWLVNWGno081H-zfUuPbLtddy02o-jxSBdN90d28Xvk63L_y_sPob-OISxFzrtQCKsqUyaGKxhHlVrAglpGeRXZ1GRSahCw2PBYIY5JooqnNuZ5pU2lNI9UfJ_MarDELqFZkurUaQE6YFYrXkkeibKKBcBVzQISD6NUlJ6rHK_MWBduA05CztL_T4GmLbxpAxKOb216ro6_6L_DCTDqItO2ewBjWHjHhQY0DHwOSMewRIlY20hUCeQk0HdlmAnIU5w-RX9sdYwXxSIBIA3hNBUBee40kG2jxnKe72rbtsXHz9_-Qen4aKL00itVDZijVP4IBfwTsnhNNOcTTYgZ5US8i5N9sEpbMAmZFu45g-nngwNcLH42irFRLNGrbbN1OnkEcDeJAvKg95fRsly63T4eEDnxpInpp5J69cORnScZYOZUPLy8x4_IDUCxAks6GJuTWXe6tY_J9fJnt2pPn7gI8Rtl02UL priority: 102 providerName: Public Library of Science |
| Title | Quality Assessment of Studies Published in Open Access and Subscription Journals: Results of a Systematic Evaluation |
| URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27167982 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1788228901 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1789039940 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC4864356 https://doaj.org/article/10bedc9224d14a63be06f4772646ad1d http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154217 |
| Volume | 11 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos000376587300082&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVAON databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals customDbUrl: eissn: 1932-6203 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0053866 issn: 1932-6203 databaseCode: DOA dateStart: 20060101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.doaj.org/ providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – providerCode: PRVHPJ databaseName: ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources customDbUrl: eissn: 1932-6203 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0053866 issn: 1932-6203 databaseCode: M~E dateStart: 20060101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://road.issn.org providerName: ISSN International Centre – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Agricultural Science Database customDbUrl: eissn: 1932-6203 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0053866 issn: 1932-6203 databaseCode: M0K dateStart: 20061201 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/agriculturejournals providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Biological Science Database customDbUrl: eissn: 1932-6203 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0053866 issn: 1932-6203 databaseCode: M7P dateStart: 20061201 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://search.proquest.com/biologicalscijournals providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Engineering Database customDbUrl: eissn: 1932-6203 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0053866 issn: 1932-6203 databaseCode: M7S dateStart: 20061201 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://search.proquest.com providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Environmental Science Database customDbUrl: eissn: 1932-6203 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0053866 issn: 1932-6203 databaseCode: PATMY dateStart: 20061201 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://search.proquest.com/environmentalscience providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Health & Medical Collection customDbUrl: eissn: 1932-6203 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0053866 issn: 1932-6203 databaseCode: 7X7 dateStart: 20061201 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/healthcomplete providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Materials Science Database customDbUrl: eissn: 1932-6203 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0053866 issn: 1932-6203 databaseCode: KB. dateStart: 20061201 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://search.proquest.com/materialsscijournals providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Nursing & allied health premium. customDbUrl: eissn: 1932-6203 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0053866 issn: 1932-6203 databaseCode: 7RV dateStart: 20061201 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/nahs providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals customDbUrl: eissn: 1932-6203 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0053866 issn: 1932-6203 databaseCode: P5Z dateStart: 20061201 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/hightechjournals providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: ProQuest Central customDbUrl: eissn: 1932-6203 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0053866 issn: 1932-6203 databaseCode: BENPR dateStart: 20061201 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.proquest.com/central providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Public Health Database customDbUrl: eissn: 1932-6203 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0053866 issn: 1932-6203 databaseCode: 8C1 dateStart: 20061201 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/publichealth providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Publicly Available Content Database customDbUrl: eissn: 1932-6203 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0053866 issn: 1932-6203 databaseCode: PIMPY dateStart: 20061201 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://search.proquest.com/publiccontent providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVATS databaseName: Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access customDbUrl: eissn: 1932-6203 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0053866 issn: 1932-6203 databaseCode: FPL dateStart: 20060101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://www.plos.org/publications/ providerName: Public Library of Science |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3db9MwELeg44EXYHwtMIpBSMBDutj55gW1UyemsRK1MHW8RE7ijEpVUpoWif-eO8fJFjQBEi_3UJ_d2Hc-_2yf7wh5xV1cpQXeqcsANiguMxN87APQNGDShhUurJNN-JNJMJ-HkT5wq7RbZWMTlaHOyhTPyA8Y7NU43oqx96vvJmaNwttVnULjJtlhiI1Bn_3pWWOJYS57nn4uZ_vsQEtnsCoLOUDswFWassvlSEXtb21zb7Usq-uA5-_-k1cWpKO7_9uVe-SOhqJ0WOvOLrkhi_tkV0_2ir7REanfPiCbOtLGTzps43jSMqfaB5E2rvUZXRQUPVToUKVhpKLI6FXLRPV_Vu_oVFbb5abCZgSdteGk6biNPv6QfDkafz78YOp0DWbqhXxjep4UeZY6GRcgZ-FKwIqJb4W5Jd0s8P0ECpidcVsgznGsnLvS5mGeZLlIuCXsR6RXgGj2CA0cN3EVF6AHJhPBc59bXprbHsDZhBnEbqQWpzqWOabUWMbqgs6HPU3dnxhlHWtZG8Rsa63qWB5_4R-hQrS8GIlb_VCuL2I9saGBBBQhBCSUMUd4diItL3dgzwLfLjKWGeQ5qlNcP2tt7Uk8dABog7l1PYO8VBwYjaNAd58Lsa2q-PjT2T8wzaYdpteaKS9hOFKhn1hAnzDKV4dzv8MJNiXtFO-h8jejUsWXKgs1G6W-vvhFW4yNogtfIcut4gktgMOOZZDH9fxpR5b76jaQG8TvzKzO0HdLisU3FQzdCQBTu96TP3_WU3IbkK6Hbh-M7ZPeZr2Vz8it9MdmUa37ymognfuKBkCDQ9YnO6PxJJr21UEN0KPoI9CT0QDoqXWC1I8UnQGN3K9QIzo-jc5_AdDcg34 |
| linkProvider | ProQuest |
| linkToHtml | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMw1V3db9MwELdGQYIXYHxsgcEMAjEessVO4iRICBXYtGqjTNtA016CkzijUpWUpgXtn-Jv5M5xsgVNwMseeI0vju3eZ333O0KecR-ttMQ7dRVCgOIzO8FiH3BNQ6ZcsHBR3WwiGA7Do6Nob4H8bGphMK2y0YlaUWdliv-RbzCI1TjeirE3k282do3C29WmhUbNFjvq9AeEbNXrwXv4fZ9zvrV5-G7bNl0F7FREfGYLoWSepV7GJSxH-gpcmiRwotxRfhYGQQIDzM24K9Ece07OfeXyKE-yXCbckS7Me4Vc9TzuoBTt-ceN5gfdIYQpz3MDtmG4YX1SFmodfRWu26KdmT_dJaC1Bb3JuKwucnR_z9c8ZwC3bv1vR3eb3DSuNu3XsrFIFlRxhywaZVbRNYO4_fIumdVIIqe03-KU0jKnJseSNqUDGR0VFDNwaF-3maSyyOh5zUvNN6tXdF9V8_GswmkkPWjhsulmi65-j3y6lN3fJ70CWGGZ0NDzE19TgXfEVCJ5HnBHpLkrwF1PmEXchkvi1GC1Y8uQcawvIAOI2er9xMhbseEti9jtW5Maq-Qv9G-RAVtaRBrXD8rpSWwUF0yQAONF4OllzJPCTZQjcg9iMli7zFhmkVVk37gu2231Zdz3IJAAc-ILizzVFIg2UmA604mcV1U8-Pj5H4gO9jtELwxRXsJxpNKUkMCeEMWsQ7nSoQSdmXaGl1HYmlOp4jMRgTcbIbp4-Ek7jJNiimKhyrmmiRxw9z3HIku1vLYnywN928ktEnQkuXP03ZFi9FWDvXshxAy-ePDnZa2S69uHH3bj3cFw5yG5AV69wBQXxlZIbzadq0fkWvp9Nqqmj7XGouTLZcv5L4Il1QU |
| linkToPdf | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMw1V3db9MwELdGQYgXYHwtMJhBIOAha-wkToKEUGGrqIZKtQGaeAlO4oxKVVKaFrR_jb-OO8fJFjQBL3vgNb44tnuf9d3vCHnMfbTSEu_UVQgBis_sBIt9wDUNmXLBwkV1s4lgPA4PD6PJGvnZ1MJgWmWjE7WizsoU_yPvM4jVON6KsX5u0iImO8NX8282dpDCm9amnUbNInvq-AeEb9XL0Q781k84H-5-ePPWNh0G7FREfGkLoWSepV7GJSxN-grcmyRwotxRfhYGQQIDzM24K9E0e07OfeXyKE-yXCbckS7Me4FcDCDGxHTCif-5sQKgR4QwpXpuwPqGM7bnZaG20W_hukXaiSnUHQNau9Cbz8rqLKf399zNU8ZweO1_Psbr5Kpxwemglpl1sqaKG2TdKLmKPjNI3M9vkmWNMHJMBy1-KS1zanIvaVNSkNFpQTEzhw50-0kqi4ye1sjUfLN6QfdVtZotK5xG0oMWRpvutqjrt8jHc9n9bdIrgC02CA09P_E1FXhNTCWS5wF3RJq7Atz4hFnEbTgmTg2GO7YSmcX6YjKAWK7eT4x8Fhs-s4jdvjWvMUz-Qv8ambGlRQRy_aBcHMVGocEECTBhBB5gxjwp3EQ5IvcgVoO1y4xlFtlCVo7rct5Wj8YDDwIMMDO-sMgjTYEoJAUy4pFcVVU8ev_pH4gO9jtETw1RXsJxpNKUlsCeEN2sQ7nZoQRdmnaGN1DwmlOp4hNxgTcbgTp7-GE7jJNi6mKhypWmiRwIAzzHIndq2W1Plgf6FpRbJOhIdefouyPF9KsGgfdCiCV8cffPy9oil0G843ej8d49cgWcfYGZL4xtkt5ysVL3yaX0-3JaLR5o5UXJl_MW81_Gc93P |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quality+Assessment+of+Studies+Published+in+Open+Access+and+Subscription+Journals%3A+Results+of+a+Systematic+Evaluation&rft.jtitle=PloS+one&rft.au=Pastorino%2C+Roberta&rft.au=Milovanovic%2C+Sonja&rft.au=Stojanovic%2C+Jovana&rft.au=Efremov%2C+Ljupcho&rft.date=2016-05-11&rft.pub=Public+Library+of+Science&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=e0154217&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0154217&rft.externalDBID=HAS_PDF_LINK&rft.externalDocID=4052720721 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1932-6203&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1932-6203&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1932-6203&client=summon |