Can artificial intelligence help for scientific writing?

This paper discusses the use of Artificial Intelligence Chatbot in scientific writing. ChatGPT is a type of chatbot, developed by OpenAI, that uses the Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT) language model to understand and respond to natural language inputs. AI chatbot and ChatGPT in particular a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Critical care (London, England) Jg. 27; H. 1; S. 75 - 5
Hauptverfasser: Salvagno, Michele, Taccone, Fabio Silvio, Gerli, Alberto Giovanni
Format: Journal Article
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: London BioMed Central 25.02.2023
BioMed Central Ltd
Springer Nature B.V
BMC
Schlagworte:
Artificial Intelligence
Chat rooms
Chatbots
Computational linguistics
Critical care
Critical Care Medicine
Emergency Medicine
Ethics
Health aspects
Humans
Intensive
Language
Language processing
Machine learning
Medical research
Medical writing
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Methods
Natural language interfaces
Natural language processing
Perspective
Plagiarism
Scientific writing
Social aspects
Software
Technology application
The future of Intensive Care Medicine
Writing
Italy
Chatbots
Scientific writing
Artificial intelligence
Machine learning
ISSN:1364-8535, 1466-609X, 1364-8535, 1466-609X, 1366-609X
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This paper discusses the use of Artificial Intelligence Chatbot in scientific writing. ChatGPT is a type of chatbot, developed by OpenAI, that uses the Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT) language model to understand and respond to natural language inputs. AI chatbot and ChatGPT in particular appear to be useful tools in scientific writing, assisting researchers and scientists in organizing material, generating an initial draft and/or in proofreading. There is no publication in the field of critical care medicine prepared using this approach; however, this will be a possibility in the next future. ChatGPT work should not be used as a replacement for human judgment and the output should always be reviewed by experts before being used in any critical decision-making or application. Moreover, several ethical issues arise about using these tools, such as the risk of plagiarism and inaccuracies, as well as a potential imbalance in its accessibility between high- and low-income countries, if the software becomes paying. For this reason, a consensus on how to regulate the use of chatbots in scientific writing will soon be required.
Bibliographie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ISSN:1364-8535
1466-609X
1364-8535
1466-609X
1366-609X
DOI:10.1186/s13054-023-04380-2