Women's preferences for contraceptive counseling and decision making

Little is known about what women value in their interactions with family planning providers and in decision making about contraception. We conducted semistructured interviews with 42 black, white and Latina patients. Transcripts were coded using modified grounded theory. While women wanted control o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Contraception (Stoneham) Vol. 88; no. 2; pp. 250 - 256
Main Authors: Dehlendorf, Christine, Levy, Kira, Kelley, Allison, Grumbach, Kevin, Steinauer, Jody
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: New York, NY Elsevier Inc 01.08.2013
Elsevier
Subjects:
ISSN:0010-7824, 1879-0518, 1879-0518
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract Little is known about what women value in their interactions with family planning providers and in decision making about contraception. We conducted semistructured interviews with 42 black, white and Latina patients. Transcripts were coded using modified grounded theory. While women wanted control over the ultimate selection of a method, most also wanted their provider to participate in the decision-making process in a way that emphasized the women's values and preferences. Women desired an intimate, friend-like relationship with their providers and also wanted to receive comprehensive information about options, particularly about side effects. More black and Spanish-speaking Latinas, as compared to whites and English-speaking Latinas, felt that providers should only share their opinion if it is elicited by a patient or if they make their rationale clear to the patient. While, in the absence of medical contraindications, decision making about contraception has often been conceptualized as a woman's autonomous decision, our data indicate that providers of contraceptive counseling can participate in the decision-making process within limits. Differences in preferences seen by race/ethnicity illustrate one example of the importance of individualizing counseling to match women's preferences.
AbstractList Background: Little is known about what women value in their interactions with family planning providers and in decision making about contraception.
Little is known about what women value in their interactions with family planning providers and in decision making about contraception. We conducted semistructured interviews with 42 black, white and Latina patients. Transcripts were coded using modified grounded theory. While women wanted control over the ultimate selection of a method, most also wanted their provider to participate in the decision-making process in a way that emphasized the women's values and preferences. Women desired an intimate, friend-like relationship with their providers and also wanted to receive comprehensive information about options, particularly about side effects. More black and Spanish-speaking Latinas, as compared to whites and English-speaking Latinas, felt that providers should only share their opinion if it is elicited by a patient or if they make their rationale clear to the patient. While, in the absence of medical contraindications, decision making about contraception has often been conceptualized as a woman's autonomous decision, our data indicate that providers of contraceptive counseling can participate in the decision-making process within limits. Differences in preferences seen by race/ethnicity illustrate one example of the importance of individualizing counseling to match women's preferences.
Abstract Background Little is known about what women value in their interactions with family planning providers and in decision making about contraception. Study Design We conducted semistructured interviews with 42 black, white and Latina patients. Transcripts were coded using modified grounded theory. Results While women wanted control over the ultimate selection of a method, most also wanted their provider to participate in the decision-making process in a way that emphasized the women's values and preferences. Women desired an intimate, friend-like relationship with their providers and also wanted to receive comprehensive information about options, particularly about side effects. More black and Spanish-speaking Latinas, as compared to whites and English-speaking Latinas, felt that providers should only share their opinion if it is elicited by a patient or if they make their rationale clear to the patient. Conclusion While, in the absence of medical contraindications, decision making about contraception has often been conceptualized as a woman's autonomous decision, our data indicate that providers of contraceptive counseling can participate in the decision-making process within limits. Differences in preferences seen by race/ethnicity illustrate one example of the importance of individualizing counseling to match women's preferences.
Little is known about what women value in their interactions with family planning providers and in decision making about contraception.BACKGROUNDLittle is known about what women value in their interactions with family planning providers and in decision making about contraception.We conducted semistructured interviews with 42 black, white and Latina patients. Transcripts were coded using modified grounded theory.STUDY DESIGNWe conducted semistructured interviews with 42 black, white and Latina patients. Transcripts were coded using modified grounded theory.While women wanted control over the ultimate selection of a method, most also wanted their provider to participate in the decision-making process in a way that emphasized the women's values and preferences. Women desired an intimate, friend-like relationship with their providers and also wanted to receive comprehensive information about options, particularly about side effects. More black and Spanish-speaking Latinas, as compared to whites and English-speaking Latinas, felt that providers should only share their opinion if it is elicited by a patient or if they make their rationale clear to the patient.RESULTSWhile women wanted control over the ultimate selection of a method, most also wanted their provider to participate in the decision-making process in a way that emphasized the women's values and preferences. Women desired an intimate, friend-like relationship with their providers and also wanted to receive comprehensive information about options, particularly about side effects. More black and Spanish-speaking Latinas, as compared to whites and English-speaking Latinas, felt that providers should only share their opinion if it is elicited by a patient or if they make their rationale clear to the patient.While, in the absence of medical contraindications, decision making about contraception has often been conceptualized as a woman's autonomous decision, our data indicate that providers of contraceptive counseling can participate in the decision-making process within limits. Differences in preferences seen by race/ethnicity illustrate one example of the importance of individualizing counseling to match women's preferences.CONCLUSIONWhile, in the absence of medical contraindications, decision making about contraception has often been conceptualized as a woman's autonomous decision, our data indicate that providers of contraceptive counseling can participate in the decision-making process within limits. Differences in preferences seen by race/ethnicity illustrate one example of the importance of individualizing counseling to match women's preferences.
Author Levy, Kira
Steinauer, Jody
Grumbach, Kevin
Dehlendorf, Christine
Kelley, Allison
AuthorAffiliation d UCSF School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA 94110, USA
e California Department of Public Health, Richmond, CA 94804, USA
b Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Bixby Center for Global Health, UCSF, San Francisco, CA 94110, USA
c Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, UCSF, San Francisco, CA 94110, USA
a Department of Family and Community Medicine, UCSF, San Francisco, CA 94110, USA
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: e California Department of Public Health, Richmond, CA 94804, USA
– name: c Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, UCSF, San Francisco, CA 94110, USA
– name: b Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Bixby Center for Global Health, UCSF, San Francisco, CA 94110, USA
– name: d UCSF School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA 94110, USA
– name: a Department of Family and Community Medicine, UCSF, San Francisco, CA 94110, USA
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Christine
  surname: Dehlendorf
  fullname: Dehlendorf, Christine
  email: cdehlendorf@fcm.ucsf.edu
  organization: Department of Family and Community Medicine, UCSF, San Francisco, CA 94110, USA
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Kira
  surname: Levy
  fullname: Levy, Kira
  organization: UCSF School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA 94110, USA
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Allison
  surname: Kelley
  fullname: Kelley, Allison
  organization: California Department of Public Health, Richmond, CA 94804, USA
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Kevin
  surname: Grumbach
  fullname: Grumbach, Kevin
  organization: Department of Family and Community Medicine, UCSF, San Francisco, CA 94110, USA
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Jody
  surname: Steinauer
  fullname: Steinauer, Jody
  organization: Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Bixby Center for Global Health, UCSF, San Francisco, CA 94110, USA
BackLink http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=27609629$$DView record in Pascal Francis
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23177265$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqNUl1rFDEUDVKx2-pfkAERfZn13sxMMoNQKGv9gIIPKj6GbOZOzXY22SYzC_33ZtittgVxny435-Tcr3PCjpx3xNgrhDkCinerufFuCNrQZrDezTkgT8g8hSdshrVscqiwPmIzAIRc1rw8ZicxrgBANpV8xo55gVJyUc3Yh59-Te5NzDaBOgrkDMWs8yG7V2NLKRtdpN66q0y7NmvJ2JhqZ2t9nd6es6ed7iO92MdT9uPjxffF5_zy66cvi_PL3AjRDHm1RNRdvcSKgArTdiCIkKrakF7yssWUi1aaTupmQnUJQmrDO6Fl23RQnLKzne5mXK6pNTS12KtNsGsdbpXXVj1EnP2lrvxWlcAFr2QSeLsXCP5mpDiotY2G-l478mNUWO1WJIv_U0vkKAoOdaK-vN_Wn37utpwIr_cEHY3uu6Bd2t9fnhTQCN4k3vmOZ4KPMR1EGTvo6chpGtsrBDU5QK3UAweoyQETmELSeP9I467MYb8vdr8pnXFrKaho7GSK1gYyg2q9PVDn7JGOSeaxafhruqW48mNwySkKVeQK1LfJqZNRkQM0gNNOF_8WOLiN30O6A7s
CODEN CCPTAY
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_wombi_2020_04_001
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pec_2019_09_003
crossref_primary_10_1097_RHU_0000000000002124
crossref_primary_10_1155_2021_6647660
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_contraception_2016_08_008
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_contraception_2016_08_010
crossref_primary_10_1080_00224499_2021_1873225
crossref_primary_10_1177_00221465241262029
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_contraception_2018_08_012
crossref_primary_10_1177_2050312118809462
crossref_primary_10_3389_fgwh_2022_815634
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10995_025_04063_0
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0293586
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_contraception_2022_02_013
crossref_primary_10_1089_jayao_2019_0074
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12913_019_4249_0
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0291966
crossref_primary_10_1080_13625187_2019_1670345
crossref_primary_10_2105_AJPH_2016_303393
crossref_primary_10_1186_1472_6874_14_28
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_whi_2017_02_008
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12978_019_0835_1
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pec_2021_03_006
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_whi_2015_05_002
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12905_020_01034_1
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajog_2016_01_173
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_contraception_2018_04_015
crossref_primary_10_7748_ns_2017_e11038
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_contraception_2014_04_012
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_contraception_2020_09_002
crossref_primary_10_1089_jwh_2022_0406
crossref_primary_10_1097_AOG_0000000000003089
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_whi_2018_12_006
crossref_primary_10_1080_03630242_2023_2220806
crossref_primary_10_1177_1363459320969775
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajog_2020_11_042
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ssmqr_2022_100178
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_contraception_2016_01_010
crossref_primary_10_1177_1524839918778832
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_contraception_2017_11_007
crossref_primary_10_1080_13625187_2021_2010040
crossref_primary_10_1080_10410236_2021_1980249
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_xfre_2022_02_005
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10995_020_02889_4
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12913_022_08851_0
crossref_primary_10_1363_psrh_12226
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_amepre_2018_06_006
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0323434
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0300151
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00403_024_03070_5
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_srhc_2016_10_003
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_whi_2017_08_003
crossref_primary_10_1097_GCO_0000000000000408
crossref_primary_10_1363_46e0814
crossref_primary_10_1590_0034_7167_2021_0104
crossref_primary_10_1177_13505068241230821
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_contraception_2017_09_005
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpag_2025_02_003
crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjgh_2021_005775
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12978_021_01254_0
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_amepre_2018_06_010
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11606_022_07433_4
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_whi_2017_03_004
crossref_primary_10_1080_00050067_2021_1978814
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajog_2019_11_1271
crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2021_049260
crossref_primary_10_1080_13625187_2017_1414793
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajog_2019_11_1279
crossref_primary_10_1080_17441692_2022_2048408
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_contraception_2015_09_016
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_contraception_2018_11_009
crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph17041198
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pecinn_2023_100169
crossref_primary_10_1111_hex_12521
crossref_primary_10_2147_OAJC_S467537
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_contraception_2016_02_007
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_contraception_2021_01_014
crossref_primary_10_1093_ibd_izz025
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_contraception_2018_01_007
crossref_primary_10_1111_josi_12363
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajog_2025_01_039
crossref_primary_10_1177_2055207620936435
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_semperi_2020_151268
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11904_021_00571_0
crossref_primary_10_1089_biores_2017_0037
crossref_primary_10_1007_s13669_016_0139_1
crossref_primary_10_1089_whr_2021_0115
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40615_016_0217_0
crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjsrh_2017_101818
crossref_primary_10_1177_23743735231183572
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12978_018_0561_0
crossref_primary_10_1177_23780231241282641
crossref_primary_10_2147_OAJC_S443453
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_contraception_2021_01_008
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_whi_2017_07_006
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpag_2021_04_011
crossref_primary_10_1080_13691058_2021_2014976
crossref_primary_10_3390_healthcare3020205
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12978_018_0569_5
crossref_primary_10_1097_ADM_0000000000001049
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_contraception_2018_01_017
crossref_primary_10_1111_sifp_12229
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10995_024_03946_y
crossref_primary_10_3109_13625187_2015_1050091
crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph16152723
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_contraception_2015_05_011
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jadohealth_2016_11_024
crossref_primary_10_1080_13625187_2025_2541781
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pecinn_2022_100061
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpag_2022_01_007
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_whi_2018_09_004
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_contraception_2022_04_011
crossref_primary_10_1089_jwh_2021_0414
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_contraception_2022_04_005
crossref_primary_10_1080_23293691_2022_2054669
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_midw_2021_103166
crossref_primary_10_1177_1540415319883422
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12978_021_01139_2
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_amepre_2024_07_019
crossref_primary_10_1363_46e0614
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0298516
crossref_primary_10_1363_46e2114
crossref_primary_10_1590_1413_81232020256_26472018
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_contraception_2019_04_007
crossref_primary_10_1080_13625187_2016_1238892
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_socscimed_2024_116826
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_contraception_2021_06_002
crossref_primary_10_2196_resprot_9249
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pec_2021_09_010
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_socscimed_2018_07_020
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_whi_2016_10_008
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gofs_2018_10_009
crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjsrh_2018_200055
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajog_2021_10_008
crossref_primary_10_1177_0961203315596079
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0312111
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pecinn_2022_100046
crossref_primary_10_1177_20503121221088102
crossref_primary_10_1080_13691058_2020_1840630
crossref_primary_10_1111_aogs_14243
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10995_019_02829_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_whi_2017_04_003
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12978_018_0615_3
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_contraception_2023_109954
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_srhc_2024_100948
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_whi_2016_09_015
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_contraception_2014_02_011
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10995_024_04002_5
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_contraception_2019_08_001
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_whi_2024_06_003
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bpobgyn_2014_05_003
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_contraception_2021_02_007
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_contraception_2022_04_012
crossref_primary_10_1055_s_0037_1604179
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_amepre_2015_03_023
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_whi_2019_11_005
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_contraception_2018_07_140
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11606_022_07586_2
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jogc_2018_11_027
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_contraception_2017_07_007
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_contraception_2021_03_004
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12905_024_03050_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_socscimed_2023_116516
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_whi_2019_08_004
crossref_primary_10_1177_1049732319861381
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_whi_2020_04_004
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_whi_2025_04_003
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_contraception_2019_09_007
crossref_primary_10_1002_jia2_26088
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jogn_2022_04_005
crossref_primary_10_1080_10410236_2019_1669271
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12905_020_0886_z
crossref_primary_10_1097_GRF_0000000000000059
crossref_primary_10_1080_13625187_2020_1843015
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_contraception_2018_10_011
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12913_024_11709_2
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10508_019_1424_7
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_whi_2019_03_002
crossref_primary_10_1080_01443615_2022_2158315
crossref_primary_10_1177_10497323211004081
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajog_2025_03_016
crossref_primary_10_1080_13625187_2017_1364719
crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjsrh_2019_200479
crossref_primary_10_1177_0022146517736822
crossref_primary_10_3109_13625187_2014_961598
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajog_2015_10_018
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_contraception_2015_02_005
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_contraception_2015_02_002
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_socscimed_2021_114632
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ogc_2020_04_007
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_contraception_2017_01_006
crossref_primary_10_3390_socsci6040114
crossref_primary_10_1002_ijgo_13363
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpag_2014_08_001
crossref_primary_10_1177_10815589231184227
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajog_2019_02_015
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bpg_2020_101666
crossref_primary_10_2196_24633
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12889_024_20471_3
crossref_primary_10_1542_peds_2018_2463
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12905_023_02804_3
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pec_2016_05_011
crossref_primary_10_1089_whr_2022_0067
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_whi_2020_11_004
crossref_primary_10_1111_napa_12074
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pec_2017_02_009
crossref_primary_10_1111_1471_0528_14413
crossref_primary_10_1111_sifp_70020
crossref_primary_10_1097_QAI_0000000000003587
Cites_doi 10.4088/JCP.v65n0712
10.2307/3181061
10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.04101.x
10.2105/AJPH.86.6.787
10.2307/2991665
10.1001/archinte.1997.00440410017001
10.1016/j.pec.2008.11.015
10.1016/S0029-7844(01)01764-1
10.1016/j.pec.2005.08.002
10.1016/j.contraception.2010.10.001
10.1016/j.pec.2006.07.007
10.1007/s10995-006-0097-8
10.1007/s11606-006-0102-3
10.1136/bmj.321.7265.867
10.1016/S0277-9536(96)00221-3
10.1363/4115809
10.2307/2991913
10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.21017.x
10.1016/S0749-3797(00)00254-3
10.1023/A:1020899425668
10.2105/AJPH.2004.041608
10.1016/j.contraception.2010.06.010
10.2307/2136053
10.1370/afm.314
10.1016/j.pec.2010.06.021
10.1016/S0010-7824(01)00181-0
10.1136/bmj.322.7284.444
10.1016/j.contraception.2007.09.013
10.1016/j.contraception.2011.07.013
10.2307/2136054
10.1177/0193841X9902300503
10.1016/S0010-7824(99)00104-3
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2013 Elsevier Inc.
Elsevier Inc.
2014 INIST-CNRS
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. 2013
Copyright_xml – notice: 2013 Elsevier Inc.
– notice: Elsevier Inc.
– notice: 2014 INIST-CNRS
– notice: Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
– notice: 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. 2013
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
IQODW
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
7ST
7U6
C1K
5PM
DOI 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012
DatabaseName CrossRef
Pascal-Francis
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
Environment Abstracts
Sustainability Science Abstracts
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
Environment Abstracts
Sustainability Science Abstracts
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
DatabaseTitleList Environment Abstracts



MEDLINE - Academic
MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1879-0518
EndPage 256
ExternalDocumentID PMC4026257
23177265
27609629
10_1016_j_contraception_2012_10_012
S0010782412009018
1_s2_0_S0010782412009018
Genre Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: NCRR NIH HHS
  grantid: KL2 RR024130
GroupedDBID ---
--K
--M
.1-
.FO
.GJ
.~1
0R~
1B1
1P~
1RT
1~.
1~5
29F
3O-
4.4
457
4G.
53G
5GY
5RE
5VS
6PF
7-5
71M
8P~
9JM
AABNK
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAIKJ
AAKOC
AALRI
AAOAW
AAQFI
AAQXK
AATTM
AAWTL
AAXKI
AAXUO
AAYWO
ABBQC
ABFNM
ABJNI
ABLJU
ABMAC
ABMZM
ABWVN
ABXDB
ACDAQ
ACGFS
ACIEU
ACIUM
ACLOT
ACRLP
ACRPL
ACVFH
ADBBV
ADCNI
ADEZE
ADMUD
ADNMO
ADVLN
AEBSH
AEIPS
AEKER
AENEX
AEUPX
AEVXI
AFFNX
AFJKZ
AFPUW
AFRHN
AFTJW
AFXIZ
AGHFR
AGQPQ
AGUBO
AGYEJ
AHHHB
AI.
AIEXJ
AIGII
AIIUN
AIKHN
AITUG
AJRQY
AJUYK
AKBMS
AKRWK
AKYEP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMRAJ
ANKPU
ANZVX
APXCP
ASPBG
AVWKF
AXJTR
AZFZN
BKOJK
BLXMC
BNPGV
CS3
DU5
EBS
EFJIC
EFKBS
EFLBG
EJD
EO8
EO9
EP2
EP3
F5P
FDB
FEDTE
FGOYB
FIRID
FNPLU
FYGXN
G-2
G-Q
GBLVA
HEC
HMK
HMO
HVGLF
HZ~
IHE
J1W
KOM
M29
M2X
M41
MO0
N9A
O-L
O9-
OAUVE
OQ.
OZT
P-8
P-9
P2P
PC.
PH~
Q38
R2-
ROL
RPZ
SAE
SCC
SDF
SDG
SDP
SEL
SES
SEW
SPCBC
SSH
SSZ
T5K
VH1
WUQ
Z5R
ZGI
~G-
~HD
AACTN
AFCTW
AFKWA
AJOXV
AMFUW
RIG
AAIAV
ABLVK
ABYKQ
AJBFU
LCYCR
9DU
AAYXX
CITATION
AGCQF
AGRNS
IQODW
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
7ST
7U6
C1K
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-5b11af8b15e0e3cdf06ee1e58ceab24d106e6d7cf7a9cdf0a4067ac2f6a7d9f03
ISICitedReferencesCount 230
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000322748400012&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 0010-7824
1879-0518
IngestDate Tue Sep 30 16:42:56 EDT 2025
Tue Oct 07 09:25:48 EDT 2025
Sun Nov 09 10:00:25 EST 2025
Thu Apr 03 07:07:15 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 09:12:10 EDT 2025
Sat Nov 29 04:20:01 EST 2025
Tue Nov 18 22:17:17 EST 2025
Fri Feb 23 02:30:32 EST 2024
Sun Feb 23 10:19:36 EST 2025
Tue Oct 14 19:29:58 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 2
Keywords Patient preferences
Shared decision making
Contraception
Race/ethnicity
Counseling
Human
Decision making
Council
Ethnic group
Biomedical information
Preference
Race
Female
Contraceptive
Woman
Language English
License https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0
CC BY 4.0
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c669t-5b11af8b15e0e3cdf06ee1e58ceab24d106e6d7cf7a9cdf0a4067ac2f6a7d9f03
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
OpenAccessLink http://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012
PMID 23177265
PQID 1412163208
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 7
ParticipantIDs pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4026257
proquest_miscellaneous_1500795773
proquest_miscellaneous_1412163208
pubmed_primary_23177265
pascalfrancis_primary_27609629
crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_contraception_2012_10_012
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_contraception_2012_10_012
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_contraception_2012_10_012
elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S0010782412009018
elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_contraception_2012_10_012
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2013-08-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2013-08-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 08
  year: 2013
  text: 2013-08-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace New York, NY
PublicationPlace_xml – name: New York, NY
– name: United States
PublicationTitle Contraception (Stoneham)
PublicationTitleAlternate Contraception
PublicationYear 2013
Publisher Elsevier Inc
Elsevier
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier Inc
– name: Elsevier
References Backman, Huhtala, Luoto (bb0195) 2002; 99
Levinson, Kao, Kuby (bb0055) 2005; 20
Farber, Novack, O'Brien (bb0155) 1997; 157
Kost, Singh, Vaughan (bb0010) 2008; 77
Charles, Gafni, Whelan (bb0115) 1997; 44
Street, Makoul, Arora (bb0020) 2009; 74
Hu, Bull, Hunkeler (bb0180) 2004; 65
Upadhyay, U.D., Informed choice in family planning: helping people decide. In: Population reports, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Population Information Program: Baltimore.
Stewart (bb0025) 1995; 152
Halpern (bb0160) 2003; 18
Halpern, Grimes, Lopez (bb0045) 2006
Canto De Cetina, Canto, Ordonez Luna (bb0185) 2001; 63
Kiesler, Auerbach (bb0065) 2006; 61
Stewart (bb0120) 2001; 322
Rosenberg MJ, Waugh MS, Burnhill MS. Compliance, counseling and satisfaction with oral contraceptives: a prospective evaluation. Fam Plann Perspect 1998; 30: 89-92, 104.
Dehlendorf, Diedrich, Drey (bb0095) 2010; 81
Smedley, Stith, Nelson (bb0100) 2003
(bb0015) 2001
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Program guidelines for project grants for family planning services. 2001 [cited 2011 October 20]; Available from
Halpern (bb0165) 2007; 22
Finer, Zolna (bb0110) 2011; 84
RamaRao, Lacuesta, Costello (bb0030) 2003; 29
Mosher, Jones (bb0005) 2010
Biermann, Dunlop, Brady (bb0130) 2006; 10
Kim YM, Kol, A, Mucheke S. Informed choice and decision-making in family planning counseling in Kenya. Int Fam Plann Persp 1998; 24: 4-11, 42.
Emmons, Rollnick (bb0125) 2001; 20
Yeo, Longhurst (bb0175) 1996; 42
Murray, Pollack, White (bb0050) 2007; 65
Stern (bb0105) 2005; 95
Chetkovich, Mauldon, Brindis (bb0090) 1999; 23
Moskowitz, Jennings (bb0135) 1996; 86
Kittur, Secura, Peipert (bb0145) 2011; 83
Nadelson, Notman (bb0150) 2002; 23
Forrest JD, Frost JJ. The family planning attitudes and experiences of low-income women. Fam Plann Perspect 1996; 28: 246-55, 277.
.
Kalmuss, Davidson, Cushman (bb0140) 1996; 28
Grimes, Schulz (bb0200) 2011; 83
Malterud, Hollnagel (bb0170) 2005; 3
Hubacher, Goco, Gonzalez (bb0190) 1999; 60
McKinstry (bb0060) 2000; 321
Becker, Klassen, Koenig (bb0085) 2009; 41
Finer (10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0110) 2011; 84
Farber (10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0155) 1997; 157
10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0070
Grimes (10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0200) 2011; 83
(10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0015) 2001
Backman (10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0195) 2002; 99
Smedley (10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0100) 2003
Murray (10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0050) 2007; 65
10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0075
Biermann (10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0130) 2006; 10
Hu (10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0180) 2004; 65
Hubacher (10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0190) 1999; 60
10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0035
Kittur (10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0145) 2011; 83
Malterud (10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0170) 2005; 3
Nadelson (10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0150) 2002; 23
Canto De Cetina (10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0185) 2001; 63
RamaRao (10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0030) 2003; 29
Kost (10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0010) 2008; 77
Stewart (10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0025) 1995; 152
Kiesler (10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0065) 2006; 61
Stern (10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0105) 2005; 95
Levinson (10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0055) 2005; 20
10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0080
Chetkovich (10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0090) 1999; 23
10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0040
Yeo (10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0175) 1996; 42
Halpern (10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0045) 2006
Street (10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0020) 2009; 74
Becker (10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0085) 2009; 41
Halpern (10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0160) 2003; 18
Mosher (10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0005) 2010
Emmons (10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0125) 2001; 20
Moskowitz (10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0135) 1996; 86
McKinstry (10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0060) 2000; 321
Charles (10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0115) 1997; 44
Dehlendorf (10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0095) 2010; 81
Halpern (10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0165) 2007; 22
Stewart (10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0120) 2001; 322
Kalmuss (10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0140) 1996; 28
16437483 - Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;(1):CD004317
15291685 - J Clin Psychiatry. 2004 Jul;65(7):959-65
20939159 - Vital Health Stat 23. 2010 Aug;(29):1-44
11552404 - Popul Rep J. 2001 Spring;(50):1-39
20650593 - Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Dec;81(3):343-8
11660682 - Int Fam Plann Persp. 1998 Mar;24(1):4-11, 42
16368220 - Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Jun;61(3):319-41
10715369 - Contraception. 1999 Dec;60(6):345-51
19150199 - Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Mar;74(3):295-301
11021866 - BMJ. 2000 Oct 7;321(7265):867-71
11222407 - BMJ. 2001 Feb 24;322(7284):444-5
16046568 - Ann Fam Med. 2005 Jul-Aug;3(4):348-52
16956742 - Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Feb;65(2):189-96
18082661 - Contraception. 2008 Jan;77(1):10-21
8659650 - Am J Public Health. 1996 Jun;86(6):787-90
21477693 - Contraception. 2011 May;83(5):479-85
15983269 - Am J Public Health. 2005 Jul;95(7):1128-38
21134497 - Contraception. 2011 Jan;83(1):5-9
9561874 - Fam Plann Perspect. 1998 Mar-Apr;30(2):89-92, 104
11368986 - Contraception. 2001 Mar;63(3):143-6
9361568 - Arch Intern Med. 1997 Nov 10;157(20):2291-4
12911651 - J Gen Intern Med. 2003 Aug;18(8):670-4
7728691 - CMAJ. 1995 May 1;152(9):1423-33
17443382 - J Gen Intern Med. 2007 May;22(5):696-700
19740233 - Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2009 Sep;41(3):158-65
22018121 - Contraception. 2011 Nov;84(5):478-85
10621576 - Eval Rev. 1999 Oct;23(5):527-52
15987329 - J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Jun;20(6):531-5
8959414 - Fam Plann Perspect. 1996 Nov-Dec;28(6):246-55, 277
12039121 - Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Apr;99(4):608-13
12783771 - Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2003 Jun;29(2):76-83
9032835 - Soc Sci Med. 1997 Mar;44(5):681-92
11137778 - Am J Prev Med. 2001 Jan;20(1):68-74
16927159 - Matern Child Health J. 2006 Sep;10(5 Suppl):S21-8
12467344 - Theor Med Bioeth. 2002;23(3):191-201
8792019 - Can Fam Physician. 1996 Aug;42:1505-8
8959415 - Fam Plann Perspect. 1996 Nov-Dec;28(6):256-60
References_xml – volume: 152
  start-page: 1423
  year: 1995
  end-page: 1433
  ident: bb0025
  article-title: Effective physician–patient communication and health outcomes: a review
  publication-title: CMAJ
– volume: 41
  start-page: 158
  year: 2009
  end-page: 165
  ident: bb0085
  article-title: Women's perspectives on family planning service quality: an exploration of differences by race, ethnicity and language
  publication-title: Perspect Sex Reprod Health
– volume: 322
  start-page: 444
  year: 2001
  end-page: 445
  ident: bb0120
  article-title: Towards a global definition of patient centred care
  publication-title: BMJ
– volume: 23
  start-page: 527
  year: 1999
  end-page: 552
  ident: bb0090
  article-title: Informed policy making for the prevention of unwanted pregnancy. Understanding low-income women's experiences with family planning
  publication-title: Eval Rev
– volume: 60
  start-page: 345
  year: 1999
  end-page: 351
  ident: bb0190
  article-title: Factors affecting continuation rates of DMPA
  publication-title: Contraception
– volume: 86
  start-page: 787
  year: 1996
  end-page: 790
  ident: bb0135
  article-title: Directive counseling on long-acting contraception
  publication-title: Am J Public Health
– volume: 23
  start-page: 191
  year: 2002
  end-page: 201
  ident: bb0150
  article-title: Boundaries in the doctor–patient relationship
  publication-title: Theor Med Bioeth
– volume: 61
  start-page: 319
  year: 2006
  end-page: 341
  ident: bb0065
  article-title: Optimal matches of patient preferences for information, decision-making and interpersonal behavior: evidence, models and interventions
  publication-title: Patient Educ Couns
– volume: 157
  start-page: 2291
  year: 1997
  end-page: 2294
  ident: bb0155
  article-title: Love, boundaries, and the patient–physician relationship
  publication-title: Arch Intern Med
– volume: 20
  start-page: 531
  year: 2005
  end-page: 535
  ident: bb0055
  article-title: Not all patients want to participate in decision making. A national study of public preferences
  publication-title: J Gen Intern Med
– start-page: 23
  year: 2010
  ident: bb0005
  article-title: Use of contraception in the United States: 1982–2008
  publication-title: Vital Health Stat
– reference: Kim YM, Kol, A, Mucheke S. Informed choice and decision-making in family planning counseling in Kenya. Int Fam Plann Persp 1998; 24: 4-11, 42.
– volume: 18
  start-page: 670
  year: 2003
  end-page: 674
  ident: bb0160
  article-title: What is clinical empathy?
  publication-title: J Gen Intern Med
– reference: Upadhyay, U.D., Informed choice in family planning: helping people decide. In: Population reports, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Population Information Program: Baltimore.
– volume: 77
  start-page: 10
  year: 2008
  end-page: 21
  ident: bb0010
  article-title: Estimates of contraceptive failure from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth
  publication-title: Contraception
– volume: 65
  start-page: 189
  year: 2007
  end-page: 196
  ident: bb0050
  article-title: Clinical decision-making: patients' preferences and experiences
  publication-title: Patient Educ Couns
– volume: 83
  start-page: 5
  year: 2011
  end-page: 9
  ident: bb0200
  article-title: Nonspecific side effects of oral contraceptives: nocebo or noise?
  publication-title: Contraception
– volume: 83
  start-page: 479
  year: 2011
  end-page: 485
  ident: bb0145
  article-title: Comparison of contraceptive use between the Contraceptive CHOICE Project and state and national data
  publication-title: Contraception
– volume: 22
  start-page: 696
  year: 2007
  end-page: 700
  ident: bb0165
  article-title: Empathy and patient–physician conflicts
  publication-title: J Gen Intern Med
– volume: 74
  start-page: 295
  year: 2009
  end-page: 301
  ident: bb0020
  article-title: How does communication heal? Pathways linking clinician-patient communication to health outcomes
  publication-title: Patient Educ Couns
– volume: 84
  start-page: 478
  year: 2011
  end-page: 485
  ident: bb0110
  article-title: Unintended pregnancy in the United States: incidence and disparities, 2006
  publication-title: Contraception
– reference: Forrest JD, Frost JJ. The family planning attitudes and experiences of low-income women. Fam Plann Perspect 1996; 28: 246-55, 277.
– volume: 99
  start-page: 608
  year: 2002
  end-page: 613
  ident: bb0195
  article-title: Advance information improves user satisfaction with the levonorgestrel intrauterine system
  publication-title: Obstet Gynecol
– volume: 44
  start-page: 681
  year: 1997
  end-page: 692
  ident: bb0115
  article-title: Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango)
  publication-title: Soc Sci Med
– volume: 95
  start-page: 1128
  year: 2005
  end-page: 1138
  ident: bb0105
  article-title: Sterilized in the name of public health: race, immigration, and reproductive control in modern California
  publication-title: Am J Public Health
– volume: 28
  start-page: 256
  year: 1996
  end-page: 260
  ident: bb0140
  article-title: Determinants of early implant discontinuation among low-income women
  publication-title: Fam Plann Perspect
– volume: 20
  start-page: 68
  year: 2001
  end-page: 74
  ident: bb0125
  article-title: Motivational interviewing in health care settings. Opportunities and limitations
  publication-title: Am J Prev Med
– volume: 63
  start-page: 143
  year: 2001
  end-page: 146
  ident: bb0185
  article-title: Effect of counseling to improve compliance in Mexican women receiving depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate
  publication-title: Contraception
– volume: 10
  start-page: S21
  year: 2006
  end-page: S28
  ident: bb0130
  article-title: Promising practices in preconception care for women at risk for poor health and pregnancy outcomes
  publication-title: Matern Child Health J
– volume: 3
  start-page: 348
  year: 2005
  end-page: 352
  ident: bb0170
  article-title: The doctor who cried: a qualitative study about the doctor's vulnerability
  publication-title: Ann Fam Med
– reference: .
– volume: 42
  start-page: 1505
  year: 1996
  end-page: 1508
  ident: bb0175
  article-title: Intimacy in the patient–physician relationship. Committee on Ethics of the College of Family Physicians of Canada
  publication-title: Can Fam Physician
– volume: 29
  start-page: 76
  year: 2003
  end-page: 83
  ident: bb0030
  article-title: The link between quality of care and contraceptive use
  publication-title: Int Fam Plan Perspect
– reference: Rosenberg MJ, Waugh MS, Burnhill MS. Compliance, counseling and satisfaction with oral contraceptives: a prospective evaluation. Fam Plann Perspect 1998; 30: 89-92, 104.
– year: 2001
  ident: bb0015
  article-title: Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century
– reference: United States Department of Health and Human Services. Program guidelines for project grants for family planning services. 2001 [cited 2011 October 20]; Available from:
– start-page: CD004317
  year: 2006
  ident: bb0045
  article-title: Strategies to improve adherence and acceptability of hormonal methods for contraception
  publication-title: Cochrane Database Syst Rev
– volume: 321
  start-page: 867
  year: 2000
  end-page: 871
  ident: bb0060
  article-title: Do patients wish to be involved in decision making in the consultation? A cross sectional survey with video vignettes
  publication-title: BMJ
– year: 2003
  ident: bb0100
  publication-title: Unequal treatment: confronting racial and ethnic disparities in healthcare
– volume: 81
  start-page: 343
  year: 2010
  end-page: 348
  ident: bb0095
  article-title: Preferences for decision-making about contraception and general health care among reproductive age women at an abortion clinic
  publication-title: Patient Educ Couns
– volume: 65
  start-page: 959
  year: 2004
  end-page: 965
  ident: bb0180
  article-title: Incidence and duration of side effects and those rated as bothersome with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor treatment for depression: patient report versus physician estimate
  publication-title: J Clin Psychiatry
– ident: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0080
– volume: 65
  start-page: 959
  year: 2004
  ident: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0180
  article-title: Incidence and duration of side effects and those rated as bothersome with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor treatment for depression: patient report versus physician estimate
  publication-title: J Clin Psychiatry
  doi: 10.4088/JCP.v65n0712
– volume: 29
  start-page: 76
  year: 2003
  ident: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0030
  article-title: The link between quality of care and contraceptive use
  publication-title: Int Fam Plan Perspect
  doi: 10.2307/3181061
– volume: 20
  start-page: 531
  year: 2005
  ident: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0055
  article-title: Not all patients want to participate in decision making. A national study of public preferences
  publication-title: J Gen Intern Med
  doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.04101.x
– volume: 86
  start-page: 787
  year: 1996
  ident: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0135
  article-title: Directive counseling on long-acting contraception
  publication-title: Am J Public Health
  doi: 10.2105/AJPH.86.6.787
– ident: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0035
  doi: 10.2307/2991665
– volume: 157
  start-page: 2291
  year: 1997
  ident: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0155
  article-title: Love, boundaries, and the patient–physician relationship
  publication-title: Arch Intern Med
  doi: 10.1001/archinte.1997.00440410017001
– start-page: CD004317
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0045
  article-title: Strategies to improve adherence and acceptability of hormonal methods for contraception
  publication-title: Cochrane Database Syst Rev
– volume: 74
  start-page: 295
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0020
  article-title: How does communication heal? Pathways linking clinician-patient communication to health outcomes
  publication-title: Patient Educ Couns
  doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.11.015
– volume: 99
  start-page: 608
  year: 2002
  ident: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0195
  article-title: Advance information improves user satisfaction with the levonorgestrel intrauterine system
  publication-title: Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1016/S0029-7844(01)01764-1
– volume: 61
  start-page: 319
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0065
  article-title: Optimal matches of patient preferences for information, decision-making and interpersonal behavior: evidence, models and interventions
  publication-title: Patient Educ Couns
  doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.08.002
– volume: 83
  start-page: 479
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0145
  article-title: Comparison of contraceptive use between the Contraceptive CHOICE Project and state and national data
  publication-title: Contraception
  doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2010.10.001
– volume: 65
  start-page: 189
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0050
  article-title: Clinical decision-making: patients' preferences and experiences
  publication-title: Patient Educ Couns
  doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.07.007
– volume: 10
  start-page: S21
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0130
  article-title: Promising practices in preconception care for women at risk for poor health and pregnancy outcomes
  publication-title: Matern Child Health J
  doi: 10.1007/s10995-006-0097-8
– volume: 22
  start-page: 696
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0165
  article-title: Empathy and patient–physician conflicts
  publication-title: J Gen Intern Med
  doi: 10.1007/s11606-006-0102-3
– year: 2003
  ident: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0100
– volume: 321
  start-page: 867
  year: 2000
  ident: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0060
  article-title: Do patients wish to be involved in decision making in the consultation? A cross sectional survey with video vignettes
  publication-title: BMJ
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7265.867
– volume: 44
  start-page: 681
  year: 1997
  ident: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0115
  article-title: Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango)
  publication-title: Soc Sci Med
  doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(96)00221-3
– volume: 41
  start-page: 158
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0085
  article-title: Women's perspectives on family planning service quality: an exploration of differences by race, ethnicity and language
  publication-title: Perspect Sex Reprod Health
  doi: 10.1363/4115809
– ident: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0070
  doi: 10.2307/2991913
– volume: 18
  start-page: 670
  year: 2003
  ident: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0160
  article-title: What is clinical empathy?
  publication-title: J Gen Intern Med
  doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.21017.x
– volume: 20
  start-page: 68
  year: 2001
  ident: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0125
  article-title: Motivational interviewing in health care settings. Opportunities and limitations
  publication-title: Am J Prev Med
  doi: 10.1016/S0749-3797(00)00254-3
– volume: 23
  start-page: 191
  year: 2002
  ident: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0150
  article-title: Boundaries in the doctor–patient relationship
  publication-title: Theor Med Bioeth
  doi: 10.1023/A:1020899425668
– volume: 95
  start-page: 1128
  year: 2005
  ident: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0105
  article-title: Sterilized in the name of public health: race, immigration, and reproductive control in modern California
  publication-title: Am J Public Health
  doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.041608
– volume: 42
  start-page: 1505
  year: 1996
  ident: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0175
  article-title: Intimacy in the patient–physician relationship. Committee on Ethics of the College of Family Physicians of Canada
  publication-title: Can Fam Physician
– volume: 152
  start-page: 1423
  year: 1995
  ident: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0025
  article-title: Effective physician–patient communication and health outcomes: a review
  publication-title: CMAJ
– volume: 83
  start-page: 5
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0200
  article-title: Nonspecific side effects of oral contraceptives: nocebo or noise?
  publication-title: Contraception
  doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2010.06.010
– ident: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0040
  doi: 10.2307/2136053
– volume: 3
  start-page: 348
  year: 2005
  ident: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0170
  article-title: The doctor who cried: a qualitative study about the doctor's vulnerability
  publication-title: Ann Fam Med
  doi: 10.1370/afm.314
– volume: 81
  start-page: 343
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0095
  article-title: Preferences for decision-making about contraception and general health care among reproductive age women at an abortion clinic
  publication-title: Patient Educ Couns
  doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.06.021
– volume: 63
  start-page: 143
  year: 2001
  ident: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0185
  article-title: Effect of counseling to improve compliance in Mexican women receiving depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate
  publication-title: Contraception
  doi: 10.1016/S0010-7824(01)00181-0
– start-page: 23
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0005
  article-title: Use of contraception in the United States: 1982–2008
  publication-title: Vital Health Stat
– volume: 322
  start-page: 444
  year: 2001
  ident: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0120
  article-title: Towards a global definition of patient centred care
  publication-title: BMJ
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7284.444
– volume: 77
  start-page: 10
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0010
  article-title: Estimates of contraceptive failure from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth
  publication-title: Contraception
  doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2007.09.013
– volume: 84
  start-page: 478
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0110
  article-title: Unintended pregnancy in the United States: incidence and disparities, 2006
  publication-title: Contraception
  doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.07.013
– volume: 28
  start-page: 256
  year: 1996
  ident: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0140
  article-title: Determinants of early implant discontinuation among low-income women
  publication-title: Fam Plann Perspect
  doi: 10.2307/2136054
– volume: 23
  start-page: 527
  year: 1999
  ident: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0090
  article-title: Informed policy making for the prevention of unwanted pregnancy. Understanding low-income women's experiences with family planning
  publication-title: Eval Rev
  doi: 10.1177/0193841X9902300503
– ident: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0075
– year: 2001
  ident: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0015
– volume: 60
  start-page: 345
  year: 1999
  ident: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012_bb0190
  article-title: Factors affecting continuation rates of DMPA
  publication-title: Contraception
  doi: 10.1016/S0010-7824(99)00104-3
– reference: 16956742 - Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Feb;65(2):189-96
– reference: 15983269 - Am J Public Health. 2005 Jul;95(7):1128-38
– reference: 10715369 - Contraception. 1999 Dec;60(6):345-51
– reference: 19740233 - Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2009 Sep;41(3):158-65
– reference: 17443382 - J Gen Intern Med. 2007 May;22(5):696-700
– reference: 11222407 - BMJ. 2001 Feb 24;322(7284):444-5
– reference: 16046568 - Ann Fam Med. 2005 Jul-Aug;3(4):348-52
– reference: 12467344 - Theor Med Bioeth. 2002;23(3):191-201
– reference: 16437483 - Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;(1):CD004317
– reference: 10621576 - Eval Rev. 1999 Oct;23(5):527-52
– reference: 11552404 - Popul Rep J. 2001 Spring;(50):1-39
– reference: 16927159 - Matern Child Health J. 2006 Sep;10(5 Suppl):S21-8
– reference: 21477693 - Contraception. 2011 May;83(5):479-85
– reference: 8659650 - Am J Public Health. 1996 Jun;86(6):787-90
– reference: 8959414 - Fam Plann Perspect. 1996 Nov-Dec;28(6):246-55, 277
– reference: 20650593 - Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Dec;81(3):343-8
– reference: 9032835 - Soc Sci Med. 1997 Mar;44(5):681-92
– reference: 18082661 - Contraception. 2008 Jan;77(1):10-21
– reference: 8959415 - Fam Plann Perspect. 1996 Nov-Dec;28(6):256-60
– reference: 11660682 - Int Fam Plann Persp. 1998 Mar;24(1):4-11, 42
– reference: 9361568 - Arch Intern Med. 1997 Nov 10;157(20):2291-4
– reference: 20939159 - Vital Health Stat 23. 2010 Aug;(29):1-44
– reference: 11137778 - Am J Prev Med. 2001 Jan;20(1):68-74
– reference: 8792019 - Can Fam Physician. 1996 Aug;42:1505-8
– reference: 15987329 - J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Jun;20(6):531-5
– reference: 12783771 - Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2003 Jun;29(2):76-83
– reference: 9561874 - Fam Plann Perspect. 1998 Mar-Apr;30(2):89-92, 104
– reference: 22018121 - Contraception. 2011 Nov;84(5):478-85
– reference: 11368986 - Contraception. 2001 Mar;63(3):143-6
– reference: 19150199 - Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Mar;74(3):295-301
– reference: 11021866 - BMJ. 2000 Oct 7;321(7265):867-71
– reference: 12911651 - J Gen Intern Med. 2003 Aug;18(8):670-4
– reference: 16368220 - Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Jun;61(3):319-41
– reference: 15291685 - J Clin Psychiatry. 2004 Jul;65(7):959-65
– reference: 7728691 - CMAJ. 1995 May 1;152(9):1423-33
– reference: 21134497 - Contraception. 2011 Jan;83(1):5-9
– reference: 12039121 - Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Apr;99(4):608-13
SSID ssj0007957
Score 2.4985714
Snippet Little is known about what women value in their interactions with family planning providers and in decision making about contraception. We conducted...
Abstract Background Little is known about what women value in their interactions with family planning providers and in decision making about contraception....
Little is known about what women value in their interactions with family planning providers and in decision making about contraception.BACKGROUNDLittle is...
Background: Little is known about what women value in their interactions with family planning providers and in decision making about contraception.
SourceID pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
pascalfrancis
crossref
elsevier
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 250
SubjectTerms Adult
African Continental Ancestry Group
Biological and medical sciences
Contraception
Contraception - adverse effects
Contraception - methods
Contraception Behavior
Contraceptives
Counseling
Decision Making
Ethnic Groups
European Continental Ancestry Group
Family Planning Services
Female
Genital system. Reproduction
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Hispanic Americans
Humans
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Patient Preference
Patient preferences
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
Physician-Patient Relations
Race/ethnicity
Shared decision making
Social Networking
Title Women's preferences for contraceptive counseling and decision making
URI https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S0010782412009018
https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S0010782412009018
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23177265
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1412163208
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1500795773
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC4026257
Volume 88
WOSCitedRecordID wos000322748400012&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVESC
  databaseName: Elsevier SD Freedom Collection Journals 2021
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1879-0518
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0007957
  issn: 0010-7824
  databaseCode: AIEXJ
  dateStart: 19950101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.sciencedirect.com
  providerName: Elsevier
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1bb9MwFLa6DU1ICHGnXKogEDygTIlzsYMQUrV1AlYKEt3UN8tJbK1Tl5WmrfbKP-fYzhU2VB546SWJE8fn8_Hx8fF3EHoVxbETp2Fqg_KPbV9I16ZSCttLYiwTT_BIk1WfDMloRCeT6Fun87PcC7OekSyjl5fR_L-KGo6BsNXW2X8Qd3VTOAC_QejwCWKHz40Er3NSajf8vMohokkXTFg613EsaxWkXu1GV87ztEi28_Zc56dqGq37dTmNFaoZvPUG68qNcCBOYfxKLxaypixoLNmXqZGPpgte6_hZ4TDvz2YqqKmOBVqdx9zkqDqCgTtruiZUmghauiaMNqUksqHXGwUrrjhWqGBKG1DDTX1qWGn_0PPG5XC2lzQbQAXq4T0Vq1dEZrfYtUdf2eHxcMjGg8n49fyHrRKPqQX6IgvLFtrBJIhAMe70Pw0mn6vhnESaLraq9y56WQcJXvv868ycW3OeQ-eTJmvKVdOa36NzG-bO-A66XcxTrL7B113UEdk9tPuliMS4jw40zN7kVgNkFoDMaoHMqkFmAcisEmSWAdkDdHw4GO9_tIuMHHYShtHSDmLX5ZLGbiAc4SWpdEIhXBHQRPAY-6kL_8NUMV3xSJ3lYC4SnmAZcpJG0vEeou0MEPoYWdiNvZD4ceDgVHFOUrBc4cYJlzABF5J00buyAVlS0NWrrCkzVsYlnrFW6zPV-uokfHWRXxWeG9aWzYq9LyXFyo3JMJQyQN1mxclVxUVeaIecuSzHzGHflScGTHPfVWuTjku76ENVsrB8jUW7-aN7LWBVb41J6EQhjrroRYk0BgOIWhXkmbhYQZ2gFjApww79yzWB6QfE66JHBp31E2AGQnAYwNu3cFtdoAjs22ey6akmsvcdHILJ8GSDuj1FN2sN8wxtLxcr8RzdSNbLab7ooS0yob2i5_4CdHwZFQ
linkProvider Elsevier
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Women%27s+preferences+for+contraceptive+counseling+and+decision+making&rft.jtitle=Contraception+%28Stoneham%29&rft.au=Dehlendorf%2C+Christine&rft.au=Levy%2C+Kira&rft.au=Kelley%2C+Allison&rft.au=Grumbach%2C+Kevin&rft.date=2013-08-01&rft.issn=1879-0518&rft.eissn=1879-0518&rft.volume=88&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=250&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.contraception.2012.10.012&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_m http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.clinicalkey.com%2Fck-thumbnails%2F00107824%2FS0010782413X00071%2Fcov150h.gif