Early economic evaluation of chelation therapy in kidney transplant recipients with high-normal lead

Kidney transplant recipients (KTR) with high-normal lead have a higher risk of graft failure (GF). Clinically, chelation therapy using meso-2,3-dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) removes lead. Despite the proposal that chelation therapy can prevent GF through lead removal, evidence is lacking. To guide...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:

Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:	PloS one Ročník 20; číslo 2; s. e0319022
Hlavní autoři:	Hao, Jiasi, Alizadeh, Behrooz Z., Postma, Maarten J., Touw, Daan J., Bakker, Stephan J. L., de Jong, Lisa A.
Médium:	Journal Article
Jazyk:	angličtina
Vydáno:	United States Public Library of Science 27.02.2025 Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Témata:	Biology and Life Sciences Care and treatment Chelating Agents - economics Chelating Agents - therapeutic use Chelation Chelation therapy Chelation Therapy - economics Chelation Therapy - methods Comparative analysis Cost analysis Cost effectiveness Cost-Benefit Analysis Dimercaptosuccinic acid Economic aspects Economics Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid Evaluation Female Graft rejection Grafting Heavy metals Hemodialysis Humans Intervention Kidney diseases Kidney transplantation Kidney Transplantation - adverse effects Kidney Transplantation - economics Kidney transplants Kidneys Lead - blood Lead content Lead poisoning Male Markov Chains Markov processes Medical care, Cost of Medicine and Health Sciences Netherlands Organ transplant recipients Patient outcomes Patients Peritoneal dialysis Physical Sciences Plasma Renal replacement therapy Sensitivity analysis Social Sciences Standard of care Statistical analysis Succimer - economics Succimer - therapeutic use Survival Therapy Transition probabilities Transplant Recipients Transplantation Uncertainty Netherlands
ISSN:	1932-6203, 1932-6203
On-line přístup:	Získat plný text
Tagy:	Přidat tag Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!

Popis
Shrnutí:	Kidney transplant recipients (KTR) with high-normal lead have a higher risk of graft failure (GF). Clinically, chelation therapy using meso-2,3-dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) removes lead. Despite the proposal that chelation therapy can prevent GF through lead removal, evidence is lacking. To guide research efforts, we conducted an early economic evaluation, aiming to explore the economic feasibility of screening for and implementing chelation therapy with oral DMSA for high-normal plasma lead concentrations in KTR (i.e., the intervention) compared to standard of care. A Markov model simulated the life course of 10,000 KTR in the Netherlands from a societal perspective. Transition probabilities were estimated using the data from TransplantLines Food and Nutrition Biobank and Cohort study. Costs and utilities were sourced from publications and public data. Model robustness was investigated through deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Various administration strategies were tested. Five-year costs were calculated from a healthcare payer's perspective. Value of information was assessed. The intervention was cost-saving and improved health, leading to a dominant incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. The result was most sensitive to transition probabilities (led by GF, followed by death with functioning graft and after graft failure). The probability of the intervention being cost-effective was 60%. Chelation strategies did not affect the result. The intervention applied to the Dutch KTR population could save €27 million in the initial five years. Further research is desirable if the cost of obtaining perfect information on GF survival is approximately below €4,000/KTR (all uncertainties under €5,000/KTR). The cost-effectiveness of the intervention is robust in KTR, except when considering the uncertainties around (graft) survival probabilities. Applying chelation therapy in the new setting we studied holds significant potential. However, trials that systematically assess the efficacy, administration strategies, and impacts on survival are crucial in updating the current evaluation and informing policies.
Bibliografie:	ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 Current address: Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands Competing Interests: The authors declare no competing interests. The funders had no role in the study design, data collection, data analysis, result interpretation, manuscript preparation, or the decision to publish the findings.
ISSN:	1932-6203 1932-6203
DOI:	10.1371/journal.pone.0319022