Dengue and yellow fever virus vectors: seasonal abundance, diversity and resting preferences in three Kenyan cities

Background The transmission patterns of dengue (DENV) and yellow fever (YFV) viruses, especially in urban settings, are influenced by Aedes ( Stegomyia ) mosquito abundance and behavior. Despite recurrent dengue outbreaks on the Kenyan coast, these parameters remain poorly defined in this and other...

Celý popis

Uložené v:
Podrobná bibliografia
Vydané v:Parasites & vectors Ročník 10; číslo 1; s. 628
Hlavní autori: Agha, Sheila B., Tchouassi, David P., Bastos, Armanda D. S., Sang, Rosemary
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:English
Vydavateľské údaje: London BioMed Central 29.12.2017
BioMed Central Ltd
BMC
Predmet:
ISSN:1756-3305, 1756-3305
On-line prístup:Získať plný text
Tagy: Pridať tag
Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!
Abstract Background The transmission patterns of dengue (DENV) and yellow fever (YFV) viruses, especially in urban settings, are influenced by Aedes ( Stegomyia ) mosquito abundance and behavior. Despite recurrent dengue outbreaks on the Kenyan coast, these parameters remain poorly defined in this and other areas of contrasting dengue endemicity in Kenya. In assessing the transmission risk of DENV/YFV in three Kenyan cities, we determined adult abundance and resting habits of potential Aedes ( Stegomyia ) vectors in Kilifi (dengue-outbreak prone), and Nairobi and Kisumu (no dengue outbreaks reported). In addition, mosquito diversity, an important consideration for changing mosquito-borne disease dynamics, was compared. Methods Between October 2014 and June 2016, host-seeking adult mosquitoes were sampled using CO 2 -baited BG-Sentinel traps (12 traps daily) placed in vegetation around homesteads, across study sites in the three major cities. Also, indoor and outdoor resting mosquitoes were sampled using Prokopack aspirators. Three samplings, each of five consecutive days, were conducted during the long-rains, short-rains and dry season for each city. Inter-city and seasonal variation in mosquito abundance and diversity was evaluated using general linear models while mosquito-resting preference (indoors vs outdoors) was compared using Chi-square test. Results Aedes aegypti , which comprised 60% ( n  = 7772) of the total 12,937 host-seeking mosquitoes collected, had comparable numbers in Kisumu (45.2%, n  = 3513) and Kilifi (37.7%, n  = 2932), both being significantly higher than Nairobi (17.1%, n  = 1327). Aedes aegypti abundance was significantly lower in the short-rains and dry season relative to the long-rains ( P  < 0.0001). Aedes bromeliae , which occurred in low numbers, did not differ significantly between seasons or cities. Mosquito diversity was highest during the long-rains and in Nairobi. Only 10% ( n  = 43) of the 450 houses aspirated were found positive for resting Ae. aegypti , with overall low captures in all areas. Aedes aegypti densities were comparable indoors/outdoors in Kilifi; but with higher densities outdoors than indoors in Kisumu and Nairobi. Conclusions The presence and abundance of Ae. aegypti near human habitations and dwellings, especially in Kilifi/Kisumu, is suggestive of increased DENV transmission risk due to higher prospects of human vector contact. Despite low abundance of Ae. bromeliae suggestive of low YFV transmission risk, its proximity to human habitation as well as the observed diversity of potential YFV vectors should be of public health concern and monitored closely for targeted control. The largely outdoor resting behavior for Ae. aegypti provides insights for targeted adult vector control especially during emergency outbreak situations.
AbstractList Abstract Background The transmission patterns of dengue (DENV) and yellow fever (YFV) viruses, especially in urban settings, are influenced by Aedes (Stegomyia) mosquito abundance and behavior. Despite recurrent dengue outbreaks on the Kenyan coast, these parameters remain poorly defined in this and other areas of contrasting dengue endemicity in Kenya. In assessing the transmission risk of DENV/YFV in three Kenyan cities, we determined adult abundance and resting habits of potential Aedes (Stegomyia) vectors in Kilifi (dengue-outbreak prone), and Nairobi and Kisumu (no dengue outbreaks reported). In addition, mosquito diversity, an important consideration for changing mosquito-borne disease dynamics, was compared. Methods Between October 2014 and June 2016, host-seeking adult mosquitoes were sampled using CO2-baited BG-Sentinel traps (12 traps daily) placed in vegetation around homesteads, across study sites in the three major cities. Also, indoor and outdoor resting mosquitoes were sampled using Prokopack aspirators. Three samplings, each of five consecutive days, were conducted during the long-rains, short-rains and dry season for each city. Inter-city and seasonal variation in mosquito abundance and diversity was evaluated using general linear models while mosquito-resting preference (indoors vs outdoors) was compared using Chi-square test. Results Aedes aegypti, which comprised 60% (n = 7772) of the total 12,937 host-seeking mosquitoes collected, had comparable numbers in Kisumu (45.2%, n = 3513) and Kilifi (37.7%, n = 2932), both being significantly higher than Nairobi (17.1%, n = 1327). Aedes aegypti abundance was significantly lower in the short-rains and dry season relative to the long-rains (P < 0.0001). Aedes bromeliae, which occurred in low numbers, did not differ significantly between seasons or cities. Mosquito diversity was highest during the long-rains and in Nairobi. Only 10% (n = 43) of the 450 houses aspirated were found positive for resting Ae. aegypti, with overall low captures in all areas. Aedes aegypti densities were comparable indoors/outdoors in Kilifi; but with higher densities outdoors than indoors in Kisumu and Nairobi. Conclusions The presence and abundance of Ae. aegypti near human habitations and dwellings, especially in Kilifi/Kisumu, is suggestive of increased DENV transmission risk due to higher prospects of human vector contact. Despite low abundance of Ae. bromeliae suggestive of low YFV transmission risk, its proximity to human habitation as well as the observed diversity of potential YFV vectors should be of public health concern and monitored closely for targeted control. The largely outdoor resting behavior for Ae. aegypti provides insights for targeted adult vector control especially during emergency outbreak situations.
BACKGROUND: The transmission patterns of dengue (DENV) and yellow fever (YFV) viruses, especially in urban settings, are influenced by Aedes (Stegomyia) mosquito abundance and behavior. Despite recurrent dengue outbreaks on the Kenyan coast, these parameters remain poorly defined in this and other areas of contrasting dengue endemicity in Kenya. In assessing the transmission risk of DENV/YFV in three Kenyan cities, we determined adult abundance and resting habits of potential Aedes (Stegomyia) vectors in Kilifi (dengue-outbreak prone), and Nairobi and Kisumu (no dengue outbreaks reported). In addition, mosquito diversity, an important consideration for changing mosquito-borne disease dynamics, was compared. METHODS: Between October 2014 and June 2016, host-seeking adult mosquitoes were sampled using CO₂-baited BG-Sentinel traps (12 traps daily) placed in vegetation around homesteads, across study sites in the three major cities. Also, indoor and outdoor resting mosquitoes were sampled using Prokopack aspirators. Three samplings, each of five consecutive days, were conducted during the long-rains, short-rains and dry season for each city. Inter-city and seasonal variation in mosquito abundance and diversity was evaluated using general linear models while mosquito-resting preference (indoors vs outdoors) was compared using Chi-square test. RESULTS: Aedes aegypti, which comprised 60% (n = 7772) of the total 12,937 host-seeking mosquitoes collected, had comparable numbers in Kisumu (45.2%, n = 3513) and Kilifi (37.7%, n = 2932), both being significantly higher than Nairobi (17.1%, n = 1327). Aedes aegypti abundance was significantly lower in the short-rains and dry season relative to the long-rains (P < 0.0001). Aedes bromeliae, which occurred in low numbers, did not differ significantly between seasons or cities. Mosquito diversity was highest during the long-rains and in Nairobi. Only 10% (n = 43) of the 450 houses aspirated were found positive for resting Ae. aegypti, with overall low captures in all areas. Aedes aegypti densities were comparable indoors/outdoors in Kilifi; but with higher densities outdoors than indoors in Kisumu and Nairobi. CONCLUSIONS: The presence and abundance of Ae. aegypti near human habitations and dwellings, especially in Kilifi/Kisumu, is suggestive of increased DENV transmission risk due to higher prospects of human vector contact. Despite low abundance of Ae. bromeliae suggestive of low YFV transmission risk, its proximity to human habitation as well as the observed diversity of potential YFV vectors should be of public health concern and monitored closely for targeted control. The largely outdoor resting behavior for Ae. aegypti provides insights for targeted adult vector control especially during emergency outbreak situations.
The transmission patterns of dengue (DENV) and yellow fever (YFV) viruses, especially in urban settings, are influenced by Aedes (Stegomyia) mosquito abundance and behavior. Despite recurrent dengue outbreaks on the Kenyan coast, these parameters remain poorly defined in this and other areas of contrasting dengue endemicity in Kenya. In assessing the transmission risk of DENV/YFV in three Kenyan cities, we determined adult abundance and resting habits of potential Aedes (Stegomyia) vectors in Kilifi (dengue-outbreak prone), and Nairobi and Kisumu (no dengue outbreaks reported). In addition, mosquito diversity, an important consideration for changing mosquito-borne disease dynamics, was compared. Between October 2014 and June 2016, host-seeking adult mosquitoes were sampled using CO.sub.2-baited BG-Sentinel traps (12 traps daily) placed in vegetation around homesteads, across study sites in the three major cities. Also, indoor and outdoor resting mosquitoes were sampled using Prokopack aspirators. Three samplings, each of five consecutive days, were conducted during the long-rains, short-rains and dry season for each city. Inter-city and seasonal variation in mosquito abundance and diversity was evaluated using general linear models while mosquito-resting preference (indoors vs outdoors) was compared using Chi-square test. Aedes aegypti, which comprised 60% (n = 7772) of the total 12,937 host-seeking mosquitoes collected, had comparable numbers in Kisumu (45.2%, n = 3513) and Kilifi (37.7%, n = 2932), both being significantly higher than Nairobi (17.1%, n = 1327). Aedes aegypti abundance was significantly lower in the short-rains and dry season relative to the long-rains (P < 0.0001). Aedes bromeliae, which occurred in low numbers, did not differ significantly between seasons or cities. Mosquito diversity was highest during the long-rains and in Nairobi. Only 10% (n = 43) of the 450 houses aspirated were found positive for resting Ae. aegypti, with overall low captures in all areas. Aedes aegypti densities were comparable indoors/outdoors in Kilifi; but with higher densities outdoors than indoors in Kisumu and Nairobi. The presence and abundance of Ae. aegypti near human habitations and dwellings, especially in Kilifi/Kisumu, is suggestive of increased DENV transmission risk due to higher prospects of human vector contact. Despite low abundance of Ae. bromeliae suggestive of low YFV transmission risk, its proximity to human habitation as well as the observed diversity of potential YFV vectors should be of public health concern and monitored closely for targeted control. The largely outdoor resting behavior for Ae. aegypti provides insights for targeted adult vector control especially during emergency outbreak situations.
Background The transmission patterns of dengue (DENV) and yellow fever (YFV) viruses, especially in urban settings, are influenced by Aedes ( Stegomyia ) mosquito abundance and behavior. Despite recurrent dengue outbreaks on the Kenyan coast, these parameters remain poorly defined in this and other areas of contrasting dengue endemicity in Kenya. In assessing the transmission risk of DENV/YFV in three Kenyan cities, we determined adult abundance and resting habits of potential Aedes ( Stegomyia ) vectors in Kilifi (dengue-outbreak prone), and Nairobi and Kisumu (no dengue outbreaks reported). In addition, mosquito diversity, an important consideration for changing mosquito-borne disease dynamics, was compared. Methods Between October 2014 and June 2016, host-seeking adult mosquitoes were sampled using CO 2 -baited BG-Sentinel traps (12 traps daily) placed in vegetation around homesteads, across study sites in the three major cities. Also, indoor and outdoor resting mosquitoes were sampled using Prokopack aspirators. Three samplings, each of five consecutive days, were conducted during the long-rains, short-rains and dry season for each city. Inter-city and seasonal variation in mosquito abundance and diversity was evaluated using general linear models while mosquito-resting preference (indoors vs outdoors) was compared using Chi-square test. Results Aedes aegypti , which comprised 60% ( n  = 7772) of the total 12,937 host-seeking mosquitoes collected, had comparable numbers in Kisumu (45.2%, n  = 3513) and Kilifi (37.7%, n  = 2932), both being significantly higher than Nairobi (17.1%, n  = 1327). Aedes aegypti abundance was significantly lower in the short-rains and dry season relative to the long-rains ( P  < 0.0001). Aedes bromeliae , which occurred in low numbers, did not differ significantly between seasons or cities. Mosquito diversity was highest during the long-rains and in Nairobi. Only 10% ( n  = 43) of the 450 houses aspirated were found positive for resting Ae. aegypti , with overall low captures in all areas. Aedes aegypti densities were comparable indoors/outdoors in Kilifi; but with higher densities outdoors than indoors in Kisumu and Nairobi. Conclusions The presence and abundance of Ae. aegypti near human habitations and dwellings, especially in Kilifi/Kisumu, is suggestive of increased DENV transmission risk due to higher prospects of human vector contact. Despite low abundance of Ae. bromeliae suggestive of low YFV transmission risk, its proximity to human habitation as well as the observed diversity of potential YFV vectors should be of public health concern and monitored closely for targeted control. The largely outdoor resting behavior for Ae. aegypti provides insights for targeted adult vector control especially during emergency outbreak situations.
The transmission patterns of dengue (DENV) and yellow fever (YFV) viruses, especially in urban settings, are influenced by Aedes (Stegomyia) mosquito abundance and behavior. Despite recurrent dengue outbreaks on the Kenyan coast, these parameters remain poorly defined in this and other areas of contrasting dengue endemicity in Kenya. In assessing the transmission risk of DENV/YFV in three Kenyan cities, we determined adult abundance and resting habits of potential Aedes (Stegomyia) vectors in Kilifi (dengue-outbreak prone), and Nairobi and Kisumu (no dengue outbreaks reported). In addition, mosquito diversity, an important consideration for changing mosquito-borne disease dynamics, was compared.BACKGROUNDThe transmission patterns of dengue (DENV) and yellow fever (YFV) viruses, especially in urban settings, are influenced by Aedes (Stegomyia) mosquito abundance and behavior. Despite recurrent dengue outbreaks on the Kenyan coast, these parameters remain poorly defined in this and other areas of contrasting dengue endemicity in Kenya. In assessing the transmission risk of DENV/YFV in three Kenyan cities, we determined adult abundance and resting habits of potential Aedes (Stegomyia) vectors in Kilifi (dengue-outbreak prone), and Nairobi and Kisumu (no dengue outbreaks reported). In addition, mosquito diversity, an important consideration for changing mosquito-borne disease dynamics, was compared.Between October 2014 and June 2016, host-seeking adult mosquitoes were sampled using CO2-baited BG-Sentinel traps (12 traps daily) placed in vegetation around homesteads, across study sites in the three major cities. Also, indoor and outdoor resting mosquitoes were sampled using Prokopack aspirators. Three samplings, each of five consecutive days, were conducted during the long-rains, short-rains and dry season for each city. Inter-city and seasonal variation in mosquito abundance and diversity was evaluated using general linear models while mosquito-resting preference (indoors vs outdoors) was compared using Chi-square test.METHODSBetween October 2014 and June 2016, host-seeking adult mosquitoes were sampled using CO2-baited BG-Sentinel traps (12 traps daily) placed in vegetation around homesteads, across study sites in the three major cities. Also, indoor and outdoor resting mosquitoes were sampled using Prokopack aspirators. Three samplings, each of five consecutive days, were conducted during the long-rains, short-rains and dry season for each city. Inter-city and seasonal variation in mosquito abundance and diversity was evaluated using general linear models while mosquito-resting preference (indoors vs outdoors) was compared using Chi-square test.Aedes aegypti, which comprised 60% (n = 7772) of the total 12,937 host-seeking mosquitoes collected, had comparable numbers in Kisumu (45.2%, n = 3513) and Kilifi (37.7%, n = 2932), both being significantly higher than Nairobi (17.1%, n = 1327). Aedes aegypti abundance was significantly lower in the short-rains and dry season relative to the long-rains (P < 0.0001). Aedes bromeliae, which occurred in low numbers, did not differ significantly between seasons or cities. Mosquito diversity was highest during the long-rains and in Nairobi. Only 10% (n = 43) of the 450 houses aspirated were found positive for resting Ae. aegypti, with overall low captures in all areas. Aedes aegypti densities were comparable indoors/outdoors in Kilifi; but with higher densities outdoors than indoors in Kisumu and Nairobi.RESULTSAedes aegypti, which comprised 60% (n = 7772) of the total 12,937 host-seeking mosquitoes collected, had comparable numbers in Kisumu (45.2%, n = 3513) and Kilifi (37.7%, n = 2932), both being significantly higher than Nairobi (17.1%, n = 1327). Aedes aegypti abundance was significantly lower in the short-rains and dry season relative to the long-rains (P < 0.0001). Aedes bromeliae, which occurred in low numbers, did not differ significantly between seasons or cities. Mosquito diversity was highest during the long-rains and in Nairobi. Only 10% (n = 43) of the 450 houses aspirated were found positive for resting Ae. aegypti, with overall low captures in all areas. Aedes aegypti densities were comparable indoors/outdoors in Kilifi; but with higher densities outdoors than indoors in Kisumu and Nairobi.The presence and abundance of Ae. aegypti near human habitations and dwellings, especially in Kilifi/Kisumu, is suggestive of increased DENV transmission risk due to higher prospects of human vector contact. Despite low abundance of Ae. bromeliae suggestive of low YFV transmission risk, its proximity to human habitation as well as the observed diversity of potential YFV vectors should be of public health concern and monitored closely for targeted control. The largely outdoor resting behavior for Ae. aegypti provides insights for targeted adult vector control especially during emergency outbreak situations.CONCLUSIONSThe presence and abundance of Ae. aegypti near human habitations and dwellings, especially in Kilifi/Kisumu, is suggestive of increased DENV transmission risk due to higher prospects of human vector contact. Despite low abundance of Ae. bromeliae suggestive of low YFV transmission risk, its proximity to human habitation as well as the observed diversity of potential YFV vectors should be of public health concern and monitored closely for targeted control. The largely outdoor resting behavior for Ae. aegypti provides insights for targeted adult vector control especially during emergency outbreak situations.
The transmission patterns of dengue (DENV) and yellow fever (YFV) viruses, especially in urban settings, are influenced by Aedes (Stegomyia) mosquito abundance and behavior. Despite recurrent dengue outbreaks on the Kenyan coast, these parameters remain poorly defined in this and other areas of contrasting dengue endemicity in Kenya. In assessing the transmission risk of DENV/YFV in three Kenyan cities, we determined adult abundance and resting habits of potential Aedes (Stegomyia) vectors in Kilifi (dengue-outbreak prone), and Nairobi and Kisumu (no dengue outbreaks reported). In addition, mosquito diversity, an important consideration for changing mosquito-borne disease dynamics, was compared. Between October 2014 and June 2016, host-seeking adult mosquitoes were sampled using CO -baited BG-Sentinel traps (12 traps daily) placed in vegetation around homesteads, across study sites in the three major cities. Also, indoor and outdoor resting mosquitoes were sampled using Prokopack aspirators. Three samplings, each of five consecutive days, were conducted during the long-rains, short-rains and dry season for each city. Inter-city and seasonal variation in mosquito abundance and diversity was evaluated using general linear models while mosquito-resting preference (indoors vs outdoors) was compared using Chi-square test. Aedes aegypti, which comprised 60% (n = 7772) of the total 12,937 host-seeking mosquitoes collected, had comparable numbers in Kisumu (45.2%, n = 3513) and Kilifi (37.7%, n = 2932), both being significantly higher than Nairobi (17.1%, n = 1327). Aedes aegypti abundance was significantly lower in the short-rains and dry season relative to the long-rains (P < 0.0001). Aedes bromeliae, which occurred in low numbers, did not differ significantly between seasons or cities. Mosquito diversity was highest during the long-rains and in Nairobi. Only 10% (n = 43) of the 450 houses aspirated were found positive for resting Ae. aegypti, with overall low captures in all areas. Aedes aegypti densities were comparable indoors/outdoors in Kilifi; but with higher densities outdoors than indoors in Kisumu and Nairobi. The presence and abundance of Ae. aegypti near human habitations and dwellings, especially in Kilifi/Kisumu, is suggestive of increased DENV transmission risk due to higher prospects of human vector contact. Despite low abundance of Ae. bromeliae suggestive of low YFV transmission risk, its proximity to human habitation as well as the observed diversity of potential YFV vectors should be of public health concern and monitored closely for targeted control. The largely outdoor resting behavior for Ae. aegypti provides insights for targeted adult vector control especially during emergency outbreak situations.
Background The transmission patterns of dengue (DENV) and yellow fever (YFV) viruses, especially in urban settings, are influenced by Aedes (Stegomyia) mosquito abundance and behavior. Despite recurrent dengue outbreaks on the Kenyan coast, these parameters remain poorly defined in this and other areas of contrasting dengue endemicity in Kenya. In assessing the transmission risk of DENV/YFV in three Kenyan cities, we determined adult abundance and resting habits of potential Aedes (Stegomyia) vectors in Kilifi (dengue-outbreak prone), and Nairobi and Kisumu (no dengue outbreaks reported). In addition, mosquito diversity, an important consideration for changing mosquito-borne disease dynamics, was compared. Methods Between October 2014 and June 2016, host-seeking adult mosquitoes were sampled using CO.sub.2-baited BG-Sentinel traps (12 traps daily) placed in vegetation around homesteads, across study sites in the three major cities. Also, indoor and outdoor resting mosquitoes were sampled using Prokopack aspirators. Three samplings, each of five consecutive days, were conducted during the long-rains, short-rains and dry season for each city. Inter-city and seasonal variation in mosquito abundance and diversity was evaluated using general linear models while mosquito-resting preference (indoors vs outdoors) was compared using Chi-square test. Results Aedes aegypti, which comprised 60% (n = 7772) of the total 12,937 host-seeking mosquitoes collected, had comparable numbers in Kisumu (45.2%, n = 3513) and Kilifi (37.7%, n = 2932), both being significantly higher than Nairobi (17.1%, n = 1327). Aedes aegypti abundance was significantly lower in the short-rains and dry season relative to the long-rains (P < 0.0001). Aedes bromeliae, which occurred in low numbers, did not differ significantly between seasons or cities. Mosquito diversity was highest during the long-rains and in Nairobi. Only 10% (n = 43) of the 450 houses aspirated were found positive for resting Ae. aegypti, with overall low captures in all areas. Aedes aegypti densities were comparable indoors/outdoors in Kilifi; but with higher densities outdoors than indoors in Kisumu and Nairobi. Conclusions The presence and abundance of Ae. aegypti near human habitations and dwellings, especially in Kilifi/Kisumu, is suggestive of increased DENV transmission risk due to higher prospects of human vector contact. Despite low abundance of Ae. bromeliae suggestive of low YFV transmission risk, its proximity to human habitation as well as the observed diversity of potential YFV vectors should be of public health concern and monitored closely for targeted control. The largely outdoor resting behavior for Ae. aegypti provides insights for targeted adult vector control especially during emergency outbreak situations. Keywords: Aedes aegypti, Aedes bromeliae, Vector abundance, Mosquito diversity, Resting preference, Urbanization, Kenya, Dengue and yellow fever risk
ArticleNumber 628
Audience Academic
Author Bastos, Armanda D. S.
Sang, Rosemary
Tchouassi, David P.
Agha, Sheila B.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Sheila B.
  orcidid: 0000-0002-5480-6865
  surname: Agha
  fullname: Agha, Sheila B.
  email: sagha@icipe.org, aghasheila@yahoo.com
  organization: International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria
– sequence: 2
  givenname: David P.
  surname: Tchouassi
  fullname: Tchouassi, David P.
  organization: International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Armanda D. S.
  surname: Bastos
  fullname: Bastos, Armanda D. S.
  organization: Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Rosemary
  surname: Sang
  fullname: Sang, Rosemary
  organization: International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, Arbovirus/Viral Hemorrhagic Fever Laboratory, Centre for Virus Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29284522$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFkktv1DAUhSNURB_wA9ggS2xAIsWP2E5YIFXlNaISEo-15Tg3qauM3drJwPx77nRK1UGoKAtH9nfOlY_PYbEXYoCieMroMWO1ep2ZoJqVlOmSy6Yu-YPigGmpSiGo3Lvzv18c5nxBqaKNVI-Kfd7wupKcHxT5HYRhBmJDR9YwjvEn6WEFiax8mjNZgZtiym9IBptjsCOx7Rw6Gxy8Ip1HMPtpfa1OkCcfBnKZoIcESGTiA5nOEwD5DGFtA3F-8pAfFw97O2Z4crMeFT8-vP9--qk8-_JxcXpyVjpV8alsJBe2FhQq0ehKAVMVNMBYa9uOcjzpRNt2vJZCu7bhjrfA2kZKYXvhdMfEUbHY-nbRXpjL5Jc2rU203lxvxDQYmybvRjCtspbSGiPpdUU1b5SC2tVK2baGSir0erv1upzbJXQOwpTsuGO6exL8uRniykhdacolGry4MUjxasaszNJnh4nbAHHOhlMpat0Iqf-LsqbG52OcCkSfb9HB4i186CMOdxvcnMhKoSMOR-r4HxR-HSy9w071Hvd3BC93BMhM8Gsa7JyzWXz7uss-u5vMbSR_OoYA2wIuxZyxHbcIo2bTY7PtscEem02PzUaj_9Jgdezk4yZcP96r5FtlxilhgGQu4pywufke0W9FigUq
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_12688_f1000research_18262_1
crossref_primary_10_12688_f1000research_18262_2
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aspen_2022_101961
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pntd_0012647
crossref_primary_10_37432_jieph_2021_4_1_30
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13071_020_04070_w
crossref_primary_10_3389_fmicb_2024_1488106
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cois_2022_100988
crossref_primary_10_3390_pathogens14050505
crossref_primary_10_1093_jme_tjaa138
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scp_2020_100339
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11538_024_01303_2
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0257205
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_actatropica_2018_07_008
crossref_primary_10_1080_22221751_2022_2063762
crossref_primary_10_1093_jme_tjaa136
crossref_primary_10_1093_jme_tjaa158
crossref_primary_10_3390_insects11060342
crossref_primary_10_52707_1081_1710_46_1_19
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pntd_0008099
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cois_2022_100958
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41467_021_21496_7
crossref_primary_10_1089_vbz_2018_2372
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_025_05408_z
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pntd_0008918
crossref_primary_10_3390_v13081627
crossref_primary_10_1093_jme_tjac005
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pntd_0013041
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13071_020_04378_7
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pntd_0010171
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0231061
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10393_023_01629_8
crossref_primary_10_1093_jme_tjaa109
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pntd_0007686
Cites_doi 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003733
10.4269/ajtmh.1999.60.281
10.1371/journal.pntd.0005858
10.1016/S0035-9203(97)90013-4
10.1603/ME11062
10.1371/journal.pntd.0001378
10.1017/S0080455X00001338
10.1111/jvec.12168
10.1016/j.ijid.2016.04.025
10.1371/journal.pntd.0003545
10.1002/rmv.584
10.1371/journal.pntd.0004313
10.1603/ME10144
10.1093/jmedent/44.2.345
10.1016/S1473-3099(12)70246-3
10.1603/033.046.0602
10.1017/S0007485300007811
10.1603/0022-2585-37.1.89
10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30513-8
10.1126/science.aac5017
10.3389/fimmu.2014.00290
10.2987/8756-971X(2006)22[229:NTFSOA]2.0.CO;2
10.1186/s13071-016-1473-x
10.4269/ajtmh.1998.59.650
10.1098/rspb.2010.2469
10.1128/CMR.11.3.480
10.1111/j.1948-7134.2013.12019.x
10.1371/journal.pntd.0001649
10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30588-6
10.1186/s12985-016-0641-0
10.1371/journal.pntd.0004981
10.1186/1756-3305-6-255
10.1038/nature12060
10.1603/033.046.0426
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright The Author(s). 2017
COPYRIGHT 2017 BioMed Central Ltd.
Copyright_xml – notice: The Author(s). 2017
– notice: COPYRIGHT 2017 BioMed Central Ltd.
DBID C6C
AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
ISR
7X8
7S9
L.6
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.1186/s13071-017-2598-2
DatabaseName Springer Nature OA Free Journals
CrossRef
PubMed
Gale In Context: Science
MEDLINE - Academic
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
AGRICOLA



MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Zoology
Public Health
EISSN 1756-3305
EndPage 628
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_b6aa008522f74072966e8c866ab8e456
PMC5747025
A546387702
29284522
10_1186_s13071_017_2598_2
Genre Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
GeographicLocations Kenya
GeographicLocations_xml – name: Kenya
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst
  funderid: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001655
– fundername: National Institutes of Health
  grantid: 1R01AI099736-01A1
  funderid: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000002
– fundername: NIH HHS
  grantid: 1R01AI099736-01A1
– fundername: NIAID NIH HHS
  grantid: R01 AI099736
– fundername: ;
– fundername: ;
  grantid: 1R01AI099736-01A1
GroupedDBID ---
0R~
123
29O
2WC
2XV
53G
5VS
7X7
88E
8FI
8FJ
AAFWJ
AAJSJ
AASML
ABDBF
ABUWG
ACGFS
ACIHN
ACPRK
ACUHS
ADBBV
ADRAZ
ADUKV
AEAQA
AENEX
AFKRA
AFPKN
AFRAH
AHBYD
AHMBA
AHYZX
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMKLP
AMTXH
AOIJS
BAPOH
BAWUL
BCNDV
BENPR
BFQNJ
BMC
BPHCQ
BVXVI
C6C
CCPQU
CS3
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EBD
EBLON
EBS
ECGQY
EJD
EMOBN
ESX
F5P
FYUFA
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
H13
HMCUK
HYE
IAO
IHR
INH
INR
ISR
ITC
KQ8
M1P
M48
M~E
O5R
O5S
OK1
OVT
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PJZUB
PPXIY
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
PUEGO
RBZ
RNS
ROL
RPM
RSV
SBL
SOJ
SV3
TR2
TUS
UKHRP
~8M
AAYXX
AFFHD
CITATION
ALIPV
NPM
7X8
7S9
L.6
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c642t-9523a830e439746e164e9e11babd02a83d3bbd28537cb92c2be1b9553af3c7d13
IEDL.DBID RSV
ISICitedReferencesCount 38
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000419235100003&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 1756-3305
IngestDate Fri Oct 03 12:50:45 EDT 2025
Tue Nov 04 02:01:22 EST 2025
Wed Oct 01 14:00:11 EDT 2025
Sun Nov 09 09:18:44 EST 2025
Tue Nov 11 10:02:39 EST 2025
Tue Nov 04 17:44:20 EST 2025
Thu Nov 13 15:18:33 EST 2025
Thu Apr 03 06:58:57 EDT 2025
Tue Nov 18 22:48:28 EST 2025
Sat Nov 29 04:02:24 EST 2025
Sat Sep 06 07:28:33 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords Urbanization
Dengue and yellow fever risk
Vector abundance
Kenya
Mosquito diversity
Resting preference
Aedes bromeliae
Aedes aegypti
Language English
License Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c642t-9523a830e439746e164e9e11babd02a83d3bbd28537cb92c2be1b9553af3c7d13
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0002-5480-6865
OpenAccessLink https://link.springer.com/10.1186/s13071-017-2598-2
PMID 29284522
PQID 1982841203
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 1
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_b6aa008522f74072966e8c866ab8e456
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5747025
proquest_miscellaneous_2053879357
proquest_miscellaneous_1982841203
gale_infotracmisc_A546387702
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A546387702
gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A546387702
pubmed_primary_29284522
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13071_017_2598_2
crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_s13071_017_2598_2
springer_journals_10_1186_s13071_017_2598_2
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2017-12-29
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2017-12-29
PublicationDate_xml – month: 12
  year: 2017
  text: 2017-12-29
  day: 29
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace London
PublicationPlace_xml – name: London
– name: England
PublicationTitle Parasites & vectors
PublicationTitleAbbrev Parasites Vectors
PublicationTitleAlternate Parasit Vectors
PublicationYear 2017
Publisher BioMed Central
BioMed Central Ltd
BMC
Publisher_xml – name: BioMed Central
– name: BioMed Central Ltd
– name: BMC
References DD Chadee (2598_CR42) 2013; 6
P Reiter (2598_CR13) 1998; 59
J Lutomiah (2598_CR15) 2013; 38
2598_CR21
JL Lutomiah (2598_CR41) 2011; 48
S Yalwala (2598_CR46) 2015; 40
DJ Gubler (2598_CR1) 1998; 11
LC Katzelnick (2598_CR6) 2015; 349
JE Brown (2598_CR19) 2011; 278
EM Ellis (2598_CR7) 2015; 9
2598_CR24
PG Jupp (2598_CR23) 1996
GM Vazquez-Prokopec (2598_CR43) 2009; 46
SB Agha (2598_CR17) 2017; 11
U Krockel (2598_CR32) 2006; 22
L Konongoi (2598_CR10) 2016; 13
2598_CR27
AJ Haddow (2598_CR40) 1969; 70
A Wilder-Smith (2598_CR4) 2016; 17
DP Tchouassi (2598_CR37) 2016; 9
LEG Mboera (2598_CR26) 2016; 10
A Farajollahi (2598_CR34) 2009; 46
TW Scott (2598_CR45) 2000; 37
2598_CR30
CR Williams (2598_CR33) 2007; 44
M Diallo (2598_CR39) 1999; 60
R Barrera (2598_CR25) 2011; 5
2598_CR12
MT Gillies (2598_CR36) 1980; 70
2598_CR14
KL Anders (2598_CR18) 2012; 12
2598_CR3
C Serie (2598_CR31) 1968; 38
LB Carrington (2598_CR20) 2014; 5
S Bhatt (2598_CR5) 2013; 496
MT Gillies (2598_CR22) 1987; 55
DF Hoel (2598_CR35) 2010; 47
MUG Kraemer (2598_CR2) 2017; 17
D Diallo (2598_CR38) 2012; 6
2598_CR16
BR Ellis (2598_CR28) 2008; 18
S Wasserman (2598_CR11) 2016; 48
BK Johnson (2598_CR8) 1982; 59
J Lutomiah (2598_CR9) 2016; 10
F Dzul-Manzanilla (2598_CR44) 2017; 54
D Fontenille (2598_CR29) 1997; 91
22206021 - PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011 Dec;5(12):e1378
28011725 - J Med Entomol. 2017 Mar 1;54(2):501-504
25923210 - PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015 Apr 29;9(4):e0003733
10072152 - Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1999 Feb;60(2):281-6
4387186 - Bull World Health Organ. 1968;38(6):873-7
27156836 - Int J Infect Dis. 2016 Jul;48:98-103
15218911 - J Med Entomol. 2000 Jan;37(1):89-101
23563266 - Nature. 2013 Apr 25;496(7446):504-7
9665979 - Clin Microbiol Rev. 1998 Jul;11(3):480-96
22720097 - PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6(6):e1649
27814732 - Virol J. 2016 Nov 4;13(1):182
21227970 - Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Aug 22;278(1717):2446-54
26383952 - Science. 2015 Sep 18;349(6254):1338-43
23174383 - Lancet Infect Dis. 2012 Dec;12(12):977-84
9463659 - Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1997 Sep-Oct;91(5):533-5
21175070 - J Med Entomol. 2010 Nov;47(6):1179-84
24987394 - Front Immunol. 2014 Jun 17;5:290
27036889 - Parasit Vectors. 2016 Mar 31;9:184
23701618 - J Vector Ecol. 2013 Jun;38(1):134-42
19960668 - J Med Entomol. 2009 Nov;46(6):1256-9
28017559 - Lancet Infect Dis. 2017 Mar;17 (3):330-338
7184757 - East Afr Med J. 1982 Dec;59(12):781-4
19645298 - J Med Entomol. 2009 Jul;46(4):919-25
18615782 - Rev Med Virol. 2008 Sep-Oct;18(5):331-46
26611965 - J Vector Ecol. 2015 Dec;40(2):301-7
28817563 - PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017 Aug 17;11(8):e0005858
26812489 - PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016 Jan 26;10(1):e0004313
22238879 - J Med Entomol. 2011 Nov;48(6):1197-201
17427707 - J Med Entomol. 2007 Mar;44(2):345-50
17019768 - J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2006 Jun;22(2):229-38
27783626 - PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016 Oct 26;10 (10 ):e0004981
25774518 - PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015 Mar 16;9(3):e0003545
28017560 - Lancet Infect Dis. 2017 Mar;17 (3):248-250
9790447 - Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1998 Oct;59(4):650-6
24004641 - Parasit Vectors. 2013 Sep 03;6(1):255
References_xml – volume: 9
  issue: 4
  year: 2015
  ident: 2598_CR7
  publication-title: PLoS Negl Trop Dis
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003733
– volume: 55
  start-page: 1
  year: 1987
  ident: 2598_CR22
  publication-title: Afrotropical Region
– ident: 2598_CR30
– volume: 60
  start-page: 281
  issue: 2
  year: 1999
  ident: 2598_CR39
  publication-title: Am J Trop Med Hyg.
  doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1999.60.281
– ident: 2598_CR3
– volume: 11
  issue: 8
  year: 2017
  ident: 2598_CR17
  publication-title: PLoS Negl Trop Dis
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005858
– volume: 91
  start-page: 533
  issue: 5
  year: 1997
  ident: 2598_CR29
  publication-title: Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg
  doi: 10.1016/S0035-9203(97)90013-4
– volume: 48
  start-page: 1197
  issue: 6
  year: 2011
  ident: 2598_CR41
  publication-title: J Med Entomol
  doi: 10.1603/ME11062
– ident: 2598_CR21
– volume: 5
  issue: 12
  year: 2011
  ident: 2598_CR25
  publication-title: PLoS Negl Trop Dis
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001378
– volume: 70
  start-page: 191
  issue: 3
  year: 1969
  ident: 2598_CR40
  publication-title: Proc R Soc Edinb Sect B Biol Sci
  doi: 10.1017/S0080455X00001338
– volume: 40
  start-page: 301
  issue: 2
  year: 2015
  ident: 2598_CR46
  publication-title: J Vector Ecol
  doi: 10.1111/jvec.12168
– volume: 48
  start-page: 98
  year: 2016
  ident: 2598_CR11
  publication-title: Int J Infect Dis
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2016.04.025
– ident: 2598_CR27
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003545
– volume: 18
  start-page: 331
  issue: 5
  year: 2008
  ident: 2598_CR28
  publication-title: Rev Med Virol
  doi: 10.1002/rmv.584
– volume: 10
  issue: 1
  year: 2016
  ident: 2598_CR26
  publication-title: PLoS Negl Trop Dis
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004313
– volume: 47
  start-page: 1179
  issue: 6
  year: 2010
  ident: 2598_CR35
  publication-title: J Med Entomol
  doi: 10.1603/ME10144
– volume: 44
  start-page: 345
  issue: 2
  year: 2007
  ident: 2598_CR33
  publication-title: J Med Entomol
  doi: 10.1093/jmedent/44.2.345
– volume: 12
  start-page: 977
  issue: 12
  year: 2012
  ident: 2598_CR18
  publication-title: Lancet Infect Dis
  doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(12)70246-3
– volume: 54
  start-page: 501
  issue: 2
  year: 2017
  ident: 2598_CR44
  publication-title: J Med Entomol
– volume: 46
  start-page: 1256
  issue: 6
  year: 2009
  ident: 2598_CR43
  publication-title: J Med Entomol
  doi: 10.1603/033.046.0602
– volume: 70
  start-page: 525
  issue: 4
  year: 1980
  ident: 2598_CR36
  publication-title: Bull Entomol Res
  doi: 10.1017/S0007485300007811
– ident: 2598_CR12
– volume: 37
  start-page: 89
  issue: 1
  year: 2000
  ident: 2598_CR45
  publication-title: J Med Entomol
  doi: 10.1603/0022-2585-37.1.89
– volume: 17
  start-page: 330
  issue: 3
  year: 2017
  ident: 2598_CR2
  publication-title: Lancet Infect Dis
  doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30513-8
– volume: 349
  start-page: 1338
  issue: 6254
  year: 2015
  ident: 2598_CR6
  publication-title: Science
  doi: 10.1126/science.aac5017
– volume: 5
  start-page: 290
  year: 2014
  ident: 2598_CR20
  publication-title: Front Immunol
  doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00290
– volume: 22
  start-page: 229
  issue: 2
  year: 2006
  ident: 2598_CR32
  publication-title: J Am Mosq Control Assoc
  doi: 10.2987/8756-971X(2006)22[229:NTFSOA]2.0.CO;2
– volume: 9
  start-page: 184
  year: 2016
  ident: 2598_CR37
  publication-title: Parasit Vectors
  doi: 10.1186/s13071-016-1473-x
– ident: 2598_CR16
– ident: 2598_CR14
– volume-title: Mosquitoes of southern Africa
  year: 1996
  ident: 2598_CR23
– volume: 59
  start-page: 650
  issue: 4
  year: 1998
  ident: 2598_CR13
  publication-title: Am J Trop Med Hyg
  doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1998.59.650
– volume: 278
  start-page: 2446
  issue: 1717
  year: 2011
  ident: 2598_CR19
  publication-title: Proc R Soc B Biol Sci
  doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.2469
– volume: 11
  start-page: 480
  issue: 3
  year: 1998
  ident: 2598_CR1
  publication-title: Clin Microbiol Rev
  doi: 10.1128/CMR.11.3.480
– volume: 38
  start-page: 134
  issue: 1
  year: 2013
  ident: 2598_CR15
  publication-title: J Vector Ecol.
  doi: 10.1111/j.1948-7134.2013.12019.x
– volume: 6
  issue: 6
  year: 2012
  ident: 2598_CR38
  publication-title: PLoS Negl Trop Dis
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001649
– volume: 17
  start-page: 248
  year: 2016
  ident: 2598_CR4
  publication-title: Lancet Infect Dis
  doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30588-6
– volume: 13
  start-page: 182
  year: 2016
  ident: 2598_CR10
  publication-title: Virol J
  doi: 10.1186/s12985-016-0641-0
– volume: 10
  issue: 10
  year: 2016
  ident: 2598_CR9
  publication-title: PLoS Negl Trop Dis
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004981
– volume: 38
  start-page: 873
  issue: 6
  year: 1968
  ident: 2598_CR31
  publication-title: Bull World Health Organ
– volume: 59
  start-page: 781
  issue: 12
  year: 1982
  ident: 2598_CR8
  publication-title: East Afr Med J
– volume: 6
  start-page: 255
  year: 2013
  ident: 2598_CR42
  publication-title: Parasit Vectors
  doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-6-255
– volume: 496
  start-page: 504
  issue: 7446
  year: 2013
  ident: 2598_CR5
  publication-title: Nature
  doi: 10.1038/nature12060
– volume: 46
  start-page: 919
  issue: 4
  year: 2009
  ident: 2598_CR34
  publication-title: J Med Entomol
  doi: 10.1603/033.046.0426
– ident: 2598_CR24
– reference: 27814732 - Virol J. 2016 Nov 4;13(1):182
– reference: 22238879 - J Med Entomol. 2011 Nov;48(6):1197-201
– reference: 26383952 - Science. 2015 Sep 18;349(6254):1338-43
– reference: 4387186 - Bull World Health Organ. 1968;38(6):873-7
– reference: 9790447 - Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1998 Oct;59(4):650-6
– reference: 26812489 - PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016 Jan 26;10(1):e0004313
– reference: 28817563 - PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017 Aug 17;11(8):e0005858
– reference: 19960668 - J Med Entomol. 2009 Nov;46(6):1256-9
– reference: 7184757 - East Afr Med J. 1982 Dec;59(12):781-4
– reference: 9665979 - Clin Microbiol Rev. 1998 Jul;11(3):480-96
– reference: 24004641 - Parasit Vectors. 2013 Sep 03;6(1):255
– reference: 15218911 - J Med Entomol. 2000 Jan;37(1):89-101
– reference: 28017560 - Lancet Infect Dis. 2017 Mar;17 (3):248-250
– reference: 9463659 - Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1997 Sep-Oct;91(5):533-5
– reference: 23563266 - Nature. 2013 Apr 25;496(7446):504-7
– reference: 28011725 - J Med Entomol. 2017 Mar 1;54(2):501-504
– reference: 27036889 - Parasit Vectors. 2016 Mar 31;9:184
– reference: 25923210 - PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015 Apr 29;9(4):e0003733
– reference: 25774518 - PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015 Mar 16;9(3):e0003545
– reference: 23174383 - Lancet Infect Dis. 2012 Dec;12(12):977-84
– reference: 21227970 - Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Aug 22;278(1717):2446-54
– reference: 17427707 - J Med Entomol. 2007 Mar;44(2):345-50
– reference: 18615782 - Rev Med Virol. 2008 Sep-Oct;18(5):331-46
– reference: 24987394 - Front Immunol. 2014 Jun 17;5:290
– reference: 23701618 - J Vector Ecol. 2013 Jun;38(1):134-42
– reference: 22206021 - PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011 Dec;5(12):e1378
– reference: 28017559 - Lancet Infect Dis. 2017 Mar;17 (3):330-338
– reference: 21175070 - J Med Entomol. 2010 Nov;47(6):1179-84
– reference: 10072152 - Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1999 Feb;60(2):281-6
– reference: 26611965 - J Vector Ecol. 2015 Dec;40(2):301-7
– reference: 19645298 - J Med Entomol. 2009 Jul;46(4):919-25
– reference: 27156836 - Int J Infect Dis. 2016 Jul;48:98-103
– reference: 22720097 - PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6(6):e1649
– reference: 27783626 - PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016 Oct 26;10 (10 ):e0004981
– reference: 17019768 - J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2006 Jun;22(2):229-38
SSID ssj0060956
Score 2.3609393
Snippet Background The transmission patterns of dengue (DENV) and yellow fever (YFV) viruses, especially in urban settings, are influenced by Aedes ( Stegomyia )...
The transmission patterns of dengue (DENV) and yellow fever (YFV) viruses, especially in urban settings, are influenced by Aedes (Stegomyia) mosquito abundance...
Background The transmission patterns of dengue (DENV) and yellow fever (YFV) viruses, especially in urban settings, are influenced by Aedes (Stegomyia)...
BACKGROUND: The transmission patterns of dengue (DENV) and yellow fever (YFV) viruses, especially in urban settings, are influenced by Aedes (Stegomyia)...
Abstract Background The transmission patterns of dengue (DENV) and yellow fever (YFV) viruses, especially in urban settings, are influenced by Aedes...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
gale
pubmed
crossref
springer
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 628
SubjectTerms adults
Aedes
Aedes aegypti
Aedes bromeliae
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Biomedicine
chi-square distribution
coasts
dengue
Dengue fever
Distribution
dry season
Entomology
Environmental aspects
host seeking
human settlements
humans
indigenous species
Infectious Diseases
Kenya
Medical climatology
Medical research
Mosquito diversity
mosquito-borne diseases
Parasitology
public health
Resting preference
risk
seasonal variation
Tropical Medicine
Urbanization
Vector abundance
vector control
vegetation
Veterinary Medicine/Veterinary Science
Virology
Yellow fever
Yellow fever virus
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1bi9UwEA6yKPgi3q2uEkUQ1LJt0jaNb-tlUZBFvMDiS8it6wHJWU5Oj-y_dyZtD9uV1RdfmwlNZiaTmWTyDSFPZVc1DjzhXBRC55UvcUnVIBBEhZS1d1ynh8IfxeFhe3QkP50p9YU5YQM88MC4PdNojX4BY51AMC9wz31r26bRpvWw-6P1LYScgqnBBiOKWjPeYZZtsxfBUgsMmxGVQMJIZrtQAuv_0ySf2ZPO50ueuzRNe9HBdXJtdCLp_jD4G-SSDzfJle_LdER-i8S3Phz3nurg6ClervyinQeVpZvFqo90kw7q4yuK54PoiFNt8D0IiP8ldVOeRuqNhTtgBPRkW40k0kWga1AAT8FGn-pAbcJkvU2-Hbz7-uZ9PhZXyC2EHOtcQgSqW1549EiqxkPY5KUvS6ONKxi0OG6MY7CbC2sks8z40si65rrjVriS3yE7YRn8PUKtZo3wlau5KyrNtOGdYDU3mhcGoiOWkWJitrIj8jgWwPipUgTSNmqQjwL5KJSPgi7Pt11OBtiNvxG_RgluCRExO30APVKjHql_6VFGnqD8FWJiBEy6OdZ9jOrDl89qH0sGtEIU8KdnI1G3hBlYPb5hAD4gjNaMcndGCYvWzpofT2qmsAkz3YJf9lGVEmLgqmQFv5iGgeVswbDWIiN3B9XcTp5J6A6zzIiYKe2MO_OWsPiRcMVrCC3BBc7Ii0m91WjQ4sXMv_8_mP-AXGW4OEuWM7lLdtar3j8kl-1mvYirR2lp_wbQEk8f
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
Title Dengue and yellow fever virus vectors: seasonal abundance, diversity and resting preferences in three Kenyan cities
URI https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13071-017-2598-2
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29284522
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1982841203
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2053879357
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC5747025
https://doaj.org/article/b6aa008522f74072966e8c866ab8e456
Volume 10
WOSCitedRecordID wos000419235100003&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVADU
  databaseName: BioMed Central
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1756-3305
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0060956
  issn: 1756-3305
  databaseCode: RBZ
  dateStart: 20080101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.biomedcentral.com/search/
  providerName: BioMedCentral
– providerCode: PRVAON
  databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1756-3305
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0060956
  issn: 1756-3305
  databaseCode: DOA
  dateStart: 20080101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.doaj.org/
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
– providerCode: PRVHPJ
  databaseName: ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1756-3305
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0060956
  issn: 1756-3305
  databaseCode: M~E
  dateStart: 20080101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://road.issn.org
  providerName: ISSN International Centre
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: Health & Medical Collection
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1756-3305
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0060956
  issn: 1756-3305
  databaseCode: 7X7
  dateStart: 20090101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/healthcomplete
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: ProQuest Central
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1756-3305
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0060956
  issn: 1756-3305
  databaseCode: BENPR
  dateStart: 20090101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.proquest.com/central
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: ProQuest Publicly Available Content Database
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1756-3305
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0060956
  issn: 1756-3305
  databaseCode: PIMPY
  dateStart: 20090101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: http://search.proquest.com/publiccontent
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVAVX
  databaseName: SpringerLINK Contemporary 1997-Present
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1756-3305
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0060956
  issn: 1756-3305
  databaseCode: RSV
  dateStart: 20081201
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://link.springer.com/search?facet-content-type=%22Journal%22
  providerName: Springer Nature
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3db9MwELfYBhIvfH8ERmUQEhIQkdhJHPO2wSYmQVVtgAovlu04pRJKp7ot2n_PnZtUZDAkeKmU-i6tz3fnO_v8MyFPZZ0VFUTCsUiEjjOXoknlMCCICilzV3EdDgq_F8NhOR7LUXuO23fV7t2WZPDUwazL4pUHbysw9UVkAQlv2yI7OYLNYIp-8rlzvwigVrTbl39k601AAaf_d2_8y3R0vlTy3H5pmIYOr_9XB26Qa23USffWanKTXHLNLXLl6yysqd8m_q1rJktHdVPRM9yN-UFrBzpOV9P50tNVWNn3rykuKGLkTrXBAySgLy9p1RV2BG686QP-Ez3dXF_i6bShC9AYR8Gpn-mG2gDieod8Ojz4-OZd3N7GEFvIURaxhJRVlzxxGMJkhYM8y0mXpkabKmHQUnFjKgbTv7BGMsuMS43Mc65rbkWV8rtku5k17j6hVrNCuKzKeZVkmmnDa8FybjRPDKRTLCJJN0TKtlDleGPGdxVSlrJQa1kqkKVCWSpgeb5hOV3jdPyNeB_HfUOIENvhi9l8olqLVabQGgNSxmqBKHKQF7rSlkWhTekg7IzIE9QahSAaDVbpTPTSe3V0cqz28I6BUogEfulZS1TPoAdWt4ceQA6Iu9Wj3O1RgpXbXvPjTjkVNmFpXONmS69SCUlzlrKEX0zDwNWW4IlzEZF7a4XedJ5JYIdeRkT0VL0nnX5LM_0WgMhzyEUhZo7Ii07hVesB_cXCf_BP1A_JVYYWk7KYyV2yvZgv3SNy2a4WUz8fkC0xFuGzHJCd_YPh6HgQVlXgaXT0YfRlEHzDT6PJWbk
linkProvider Springer Nature
linkToHtml http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3db9MwELdggOCF70FggEFISLCIxE7imLfxMW2iVIgNNPFi2Y5TKqF0qpui_ffcuUlFBkOC1_qurc935zv7_DtCnso6KyqIhGORCB1nLkWTymFBEBVS5q7iOjwUHonxuDw6kh-7d9y-r3bvrySDpw5mXRYvPXhbgakvIgtI-Lbz5EKGXXYwRT_40rtfBFAruuvLP7INNqCA0_-7N_5lOzpdKnnqvjRsQ7vX_msC18nVLuqkOys1uUHOueYmufR1Fs7UbxH_1jWT1lHdVPQEb2N-0NqBjtPldN56ugwn-_4VxQNFjNypNviABPRlm1Z9YUfgxk4f8J_o8bp9iafThi5AYxwFp36iG2oDiOtt8nn33eGbvbjrxhBbyFEWsYSUVZc8cRjCZIWDPMtJl6ZGmyphMFJxYyoG27-wRjLLjEuNzHOua25FlfJNstHMGneXUKtZIVxW5bxKMs204bVgOTeaJwbSKRaRpF8iZTuocuyY8V2FlKUs1EqWCmSpUJYKWJ6vWY5XOB1_I36N674mRIjt8MFsPlGdxSpTaI0BKWO1QBQ5yAtdacui0KZ0EHZG5AlqjUIQjQardCa69V7tH3xSO9hjoBQigV961hHVM5iB1d2jB5AD4m4NKLcGlGDldjD8uFdOhUNYGte4WetVKiFpzlKW8LNpGLjaEjxxLiJyZ6XQ68kzCewwy4iIgaoPpDMcaabfAhB5DrkoxMwRedErvOo8oD9b-Pf-ifoRubx3-GGkRvvj9_fJFYbWk7KYyS2ysZi37gG5aJeLqZ8_DF7gJxZ1Vo0
linkToPdf http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3db9MwELdgfIgXvgeFAQYhIcGiJc6HY94Go2JiqqYNpokXy46dUgm5Vd0W7b_nzkkqMhgS4rW-S-rL3fnOPv-OkJeizgoDkXDEY66izCZoUjl8EESFFLk1qQoXhQ_4aFSenorDts-p76rduyPJ5k4DojS5xc7M1I2Jl8WOB8_LMQ1GlAEBT75MrmSQyGBN19HxSeeKEUytaI8y_8jWW4wCZv_vnvmXpel82eS5s9OwJA1v_fdkbpObbTRKdxv1uUMuWXeXXPs6DXvt94jfs268tFQ5Q8_wlOYHrS3oPl1N5ktPV2HH37-luNGIET1VGi-WgB5tU9MVfARu7AAC_4_O1m1NPJ04ugBNshSc_ZlytArgrvfJl-GHz-8_Rm2XhqiC3GURCUhlVZnGFkObrLCQf1lhk0QrbWIGIybV2jAIC3ilBauYtokWeZ6qOq24SdJNsuGmzj4ktFKs4DYzeWriTDGl05qzPNUqjTWkWWxA4u5zyaqFMMdOGt9lSGXKQjaylCBLibKUwPJ6zTJr8Dv-RvwOdWBNiNDb4YfpfCxbS5a6UAoDVcZqjuhykC_asiqLQunSQjg6IC9QgySCazis3hmrpfdy__hI7mLvgZLzGN70qiWqpzCDSrWXIUAOiMfVo9zqUYL1V73h552iShzCkjlnp0svEwHJdJawOL2YhoELLsFD53xAHjTKvZ48E8AOsxwQ3lP7nnT6I27yLQCU55CjQiw9IG865ZetZ_QXC__RP1E_I9cP94byYH_06TG5wdB4EhYxsUU2FvOlfUKuVqvFxM-fBofwE5vtX3E
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dengue+and+yellow+fever+virus+vectors%3A+seasonal+abundance%2C+diversity+and+resting+preferences+in+three+Kenyan+cities&rft.jtitle=Parasites+%26+vectors&rft.au=Agha%2C+Sheila+B&rft.au=Tchouassi%2C+David+P&rft.au=Bastos%2C+Armanda+D+S&rft.au=Sang%2C+Rosemary&rft.date=2017-12-29&rft.issn=1756-3305&rft.eissn=1756-3305&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=1+p.628-628&rft.spage=628&rft.epage=628&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs13071-017-2598-2&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1756-3305&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1756-3305&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1756-3305&client=summon