Comparative analysis of patient-reported outcomes in joint arthroplasty surgeries

This study aims to report and analyze disease-specific patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) effect size (ES) variations, in patients undergoing major arthroplasty surgery. All institution-based data of primary knee, hip, or shoulder arthroplasty patients at Turku University hospital (Finland) bet...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one Jg. 19; H. 12; S. e0314818
Hauptverfasser: Äärimaa, Ville, Kohtala, Karita, Mäkelä, Keijo, Karvonen, Mikko, Arimaa, Anssi, Ryösä, Anssi, Kostensalo, Joel, Kaivonen, Fanny, Laaksonen, Inari
Format: Journal Article
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: United States Public Library of Science 23.12.2024
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Schlagworte:
Age
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Arthroplasty
Arthroplasty (hip)
Arthroplasty (knee)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder
Biology and Life Sciences
Body mass index
Classification
Comparative analysis
Decision making
Demographic aspects
Disease
Female
Generalized linear models
Health services
Hip
Humans
Joint replacement
Joint surgery
Joints (anatomy)
Knee
Male
Medicine and Health Sciences
Middle Aged
Osteoarthritis
Patient outcomes
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
Patient satisfaction
Patients
Shared decision making
Shoulder
Surgery
Treatment Outcome
Finland
ISSN:1932-6203, 1932-6203
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This study aims to report and analyze disease-specific patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) effect size (ES) variations, in patients undergoing major arthroplasty surgery. All institution-based data of primary knee, hip, or shoulder arthroplasty patients at Turku University hospital (Finland) between January 2020 -December 2022 were collected, and treatment outcome assessed as a PROM difference between baseline and one-year follow-up. PROM ES were calculated for each patient and patient group separately, and patients with ES >0.5, were considered responders. Factors contributing to patient outcome and differences between patient groups were investigated using linear models and non-parametric methods. 2580 patients were operated (complete follow-up data on 1828 patients). 1110 (61%) of the patients were female, and mean age was 69 years (SD 10). The mean ES across all patient groups was 2.64 (SD 1.29) and the biggest ES was observed in shoulder patients and the smallest in knee patients. Smaller ES was statistically significantly associated with higher preoperative PROM, higher ASA class, and old age. The percentage of responders was highest for shoulder patients (97.7%), followed by hip patients (96.8%), and lowest for knee patients (92.5%). The observed ES for joint arthroplasty surgeries is high. However, there are significant disparities among patients with primary knee, hip, and shoulder joint arthroplasty surgery. These variations are mainly due to differences in preoperative PROM score and may be attributed to differences in patient selection. We recommend that prior to shared decision-making, preoperative scores are thoroughly reviewed with the patient, along with other patient specific factors that may influence the end result of the treatment.
Bibliographie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
Competing Interests: Ville Äärimaa has received grants from the Academy of Finland, the Social Insurance Institution of Finland, and the Turku University hospital. Ville Äärimaa has received payment for expert testimony given to National Patient Injury Board. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. Inari Laaksonen have received grants from the State Research Funding of Southwestern Finland. Turku University Hospital has supported Ville Äärimaa, and Inari Laaksonen to attend meetings and/or travel.
KM, MK, AA and AR also contributed equally to this work.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0314818