Radiogenomic association of deep MR imaging features with genomic profiles and clinical characteristics in breast cancer

Background It has been believed that traditional handcrafted radiomic features extracted from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of tumors are normally shallow and low-ordered. Recent advancement in deep learning technology shows that the high-order deep radiomic features extracted automatically from...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Biomarker research Ročník 11; číslo 1; s. 9 - 11
Hlavní autoři: Liu, Qian, Hu, Pingzhao
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: London BioMed Central 24.01.2023
BioMed Central Ltd
Springer Nature B.V
BMC
Témata:
ISSN:2050-7771, 2050-7771
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Abstract Background It has been believed that traditional handcrafted radiomic features extracted from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of tumors are normally shallow and low-ordered. Recent advancement in deep learning technology shows that the high-order deep radiomic features extracted automatically from tumor images can capture tumor heterogeneity in a more efficient way. We hypothesize that MRI-based deep radiomic phenotypes have significant associations with molecular profiles of breast cancer tumors. We aim to identify deep radiomic features (DRFs) from MRI, evaluate their significance in predicting breast cancer (BC) clinical characteristics and explore their associations with multi-level genomic factors. Methods A denoising autoencoder was built to retrospectively extract 4,096 DRFs from 110 BC patients’ MRI. Visualization and clustering were applied to these DRFs. Linear Mixed Effect models were used to test their associations with multi-level genomic features (GFs) (risk genes, gene signatures, and biological pathway activities) extracted from the same patients’ mRNA expression profile. A Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator model was used to identify the most predictive DRFs for each clinical characteristic (tumor size (T), lymph node metastasis (N), estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status). Results Thirty-six conventional radiomic features (CRFs) for 87 of the 110 BC patients provided by a previous study were used for comparison. More than 1,000 DRFs were associated with the risk genes, gene signatures, and biological pathways activities (adjusted P -value < 0.05). DRFs produced better performance in predicting T, N, ER, PR, and HER2 status (AUC > 0.9) using DRFs. These DRFs showed significant powers of stratifying patients, linking to relevant biological and clinical characteristics. As a contrast, only eight risk genes were associated with CRFs. The RFs performed worse in predicting clinical characteristics than DRFs. Conclusions The deep learning-based auto MRI features perform better in predicting BC clinical characteristics, which are more significantly associated with GFs than traditional semi-auto MRI features. Our radiogenomic approach for identifying MRI-based imaging signatures may pave potential pathways for the discovery of genetic mechanisms regulating specific tumor phenotypes and may enable a more rapid innovation of novel imaging modalities, hence accelerating their translation to personalized medicine.
AbstractList It has been believed that traditional handcrafted radiomic features extracted from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of tumors are normally shallow and low-ordered. Recent advancement in deep learning technology shows that the high-order deep radiomic features extracted automatically from tumor images can capture tumor heterogeneity in a more efficient way. We hypothesize that MRI-based deep radiomic phenotypes have significant associations with molecular profiles of breast cancer tumors. We aim to identify deep radiomic features (DRFs) from MRI, evaluate their significance in predicting breast cancer (BC) clinical characteristics and explore their associations with multi-level genomic factors.BACKGROUNDIt has been believed that traditional handcrafted radiomic features extracted from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of tumors are normally shallow and low-ordered. Recent advancement in deep learning technology shows that the high-order deep radiomic features extracted automatically from tumor images can capture tumor heterogeneity in a more efficient way. We hypothesize that MRI-based deep radiomic phenotypes have significant associations with molecular profiles of breast cancer tumors. We aim to identify deep radiomic features (DRFs) from MRI, evaluate their significance in predicting breast cancer (BC) clinical characteristics and explore their associations with multi-level genomic factors.A denoising autoencoder was built to retrospectively extract 4,096 DRFs from 110 BC patients' MRI. Visualization and clustering were applied to these DRFs. Linear Mixed Effect models were used to test their associations with multi-level genomic features (GFs) (risk genes, gene signatures, and biological pathway activities) extracted from the same patients' mRNA expression profile. A Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator model was used to identify the most predictive DRFs for each clinical characteristic (tumor size (T), lymph node metastasis (N), estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status).METHODSA denoising autoencoder was built to retrospectively extract 4,096 DRFs from 110 BC patients' MRI. Visualization and clustering were applied to these DRFs. Linear Mixed Effect models were used to test their associations with multi-level genomic features (GFs) (risk genes, gene signatures, and biological pathway activities) extracted from the same patients' mRNA expression profile. A Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator model was used to identify the most predictive DRFs for each clinical characteristic (tumor size (T), lymph node metastasis (N), estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status).Thirty-six conventional radiomic features (CRFs) for 87 of the 110 BC patients provided by a previous study were used for comparison. More than 1,000 DRFs were associated with the risk genes, gene signatures, and biological pathways activities (adjusted P-value < 0.05). DRFs produced better performance in predicting T, N, ER, PR, and HER2 status (AUC > 0.9) using DRFs. These DRFs showed significant powers of stratifying patients, linking to relevant biological and clinical characteristics. As a contrast, only eight risk genes were associated with CRFs. The RFs performed worse in predicting clinical characteristics than DRFs.RESULTSThirty-six conventional radiomic features (CRFs) for 87 of the 110 BC patients provided by a previous study were used for comparison. More than 1,000 DRFs were associated with the risk genes, gene signatures, and biological pathways activities (adjusted P-value < 0.05). DRFs produced better performance in predicting T, N, ER, PR, and HER2 status (AUC > 0.9) using DRFs. These DRFs showed significant powers of stratifying patients, linking to relevant biological and clinical characteristics. As a contrast, only eight risk genes were associated with CRFs. The RFs performed worse in predicting clinical characteristics than DRFs.The deep learning-based auto MRI features perform better in predicting BC clinical characteristics, which are more significantly associated with GFs than traditional semi-auto MRI features. Our radiogenomic approach for identifying MRI-based imaging signatures may pave potential pathways for the discovery of genetic mechanisms regulating specific tumor phenotypes and may enable a more rapid innovation of novel imaging modalities, hence accelerating their translation to personalized medicine.CONCLUSIONSThe deep learning-based auto MRI features perform better in predicting BC clinical characteristics, which are more significantly associated with GFs than traditional semi-auto MRI features. Our radiogenomic approach for identifying MRI-based imaging signatures may pave potential pathways for the discovery of genetic mechanisms regulating specific tumor phenotypes and may enable a more rapid innovation of novel imaging modalities, hence accelerating their translation to personalized medicine.
Abstract Background It has been believed that traditional handcrafted radiomic features extracted from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of tumors are normally shallow and low-ordered. Recent advancement in deep learning technology shows that the high-order deep radiomic features extracted automatically from tumor images can capture tumor heterogeneity in a more efficient way. We hypothesize that MRI-based deep radiomic phenotypes have significant associations with molecular profiles of breast cancer tumors. We aim to identify deep radiomic features (DRFs) from MRI, evaluate their significance in predicting breast cancer (BC) clinical characteristics and explore their associations with multi-level genomic factors. Methods A denoising autoencoder was built to retrospectively extract 4,096 DRFs from 110 BC patients’ MRI. Visualization and clustering were applied to these DRFs. Linear Mixed Effect models were used to test their associations with multi-level genomic features (GFs) (risk genes, gene signatures, and biological pathway activities) extracted from the same patients’ mRNA expression profile. A Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator model was used to identify the most predictive DRFs for each clinical characteristic (tumor size (T), lymph node metastasis (N), estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status). Results Thirty-six conventional radiomic features (CRFs) for 87 of the 110 BC patients provided by a previous study were used for comparison. More than 1,000 DRFs were associated with the risk genes, gene signatures, and biological pathways activities (adjusted P-value < 0.05). DRFs produced better performance in predicting T, N, ER, PR, and HER2 status (AUC > 0.9) using DRFs. These DRFs showed significant powers of stratifying patients, linking to relevant biological and clinical characteristics. As a contrast, only eight risk genes were associated with CRFs. The RFs performed worse in predicting clinical characteristics than DRFs. Conclusions The deep learning-based auto MRI features perform better in predicting BC clinical characteristics, which are more significantly associated with GFs than traditional semi-auto MRI features. Our radiogenomic approach for identifying MRI-based imaging signatures may pave potential pathways for the discovery of genetic mechanisms regulating specific tumor phenotypes and may enable a more rapid innovation of novel imaging modalities, hence accelerating their translation to personalized medicine.
BackgroundIt has been believed that traditional handcrafted radiomic features extracted from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of tumors are normally shallow and low-ordered. Recent advancement in deep learning technology shows that the high-order deep radiomic features extracted automatically from tumor images can capture tumor heterogeneity in a more efficient way. We hypothesize that MRI-based deep radiomic phenotypes have significant associations with molecular profiles of breast cancer tumors. We aim to identify deep radiomic features (DRFs) from MRI, evaluate their significance in predicting breast cancer (BC) clinical characteristics and explore their associations with multi-level genomic factors.MethodsA denoising autoencoder was built to retrospectively extract 4,096 DRFs from 110 BC patients’ MRI. Visualization and clustering were applied to these DRFs. Linear Mixed Effect models were used to test their associations with multi-level genomic features (GFs) (risk genes, gene signatures, and biological pathway activities) extracted from the same patients’ mRNA expression profile. A Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator model was used to identify the most predictive DRFs for each clinical characteristic (tumor size (T), lymph node metastasis (N), estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status).ResultsThirty-six conventional radiomic features (CRFs) for 87 of the 110 BC patients provided by a previous study were used for comparison. More than 1,000 DRFs were associated with the risk genes, gene signatures, and biological pathways activities (adjusted P-value < 0.05). DRFs produced better performance in predicting T, N, ER, PR, and HER2 status (AUC > 0.9) using DRFs. These DRFs showed significant powers of stratifying patients, linking to relevant biological and clinical characteristics. As a contrast, only eight risk genes were associated with CRFs. The RFs performed worse in predicting clinical characteristics than DRFs.ConclusionsThe deep learning-based auto MRI features perform better in predicting BC clinical characteristics, which are more significantly associated with GFs than traditional semi-auto MRI features. Our radiogenomic approach for identifying MRI-based imaging signatures may pave potential pathways for the discovery of genetic mechanisms regulating specific tumor phenotypes and may enable a more rapid innovation of novel imaging modalities, hence accelerating their translation to personalized medicine.
Background It has been believed that traditional handcrafted radiomic features extracted from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of tumors are normally shallow and low-ordered. Recent advancement in deep learning technology shows that the high-order deep radiomic features extracted automatically from tumor images can capture tumor heterogeneity in a more efficient way. We hypothesize that MRI-based deep radiomic phenotypes have significant associations with molecular profiles of breast cancer tumors. We aim to identify deep radiomic features (DRFs) from MRI, evaluate their significance in predicting breast cancer (BC) clinical characteristics and explore their associations with multi-level genomic factors. Methods A denoising autoencoder was built to retrospectively extract 4,096 DRFs from 110 BC patients’ MRI. Visualization and clustering were applied to these DRFs. Linear Mixed Effect models were used to test their associations with multi-level genomic features (GFs) (risk genes, gene signatures, and biological pathway activities) extracted from the same patients’ mRNA expression profile. A Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator model was used to identify the most predictive DRFs for each clinical characteristic (tumor size (T), lymph node metastasis (N), estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status). Results Thirty-six conventional radiomic features (CRFs) for 87 of the 110 BC patients provided by a previous study were used for comparison. More than 1,000 DRFs were associated with the risk genes, gene signatures, and biological pathways activities (adjusted P -value < 0.05). DRFs produced better performance in predicting T, N, ER, PR, and HER2 status (AUC > 0.9) using DRFs. These DRFs showed significant powers of stratifying patients, linking to relevant biological and clinical characteristics. As a contrast, only eight risk genes were associated with CRFs. The RFs performed worse in predicting clinical characteristics than DRFs. Conclusions The deep learning-based auto MRI features perform better in predicting BC clinical characteristics, which are more significantly associated with GFs than traditional semi-auto MRI features. Our radiogenomic approach for identifying MRI-based imaging signatures may pave potential pathways for the discovery of genetic mechanisms regulating specific tumor phenotypes and may enable a more rapid innovation of novel imaging modalities, hence accelerating their translation to personalized medicine.
It has been believed that traditional handcrafted radiomic features extracted from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of tumors are normally shallow and low-ordered. Recent advancement in deep learning technology shows that the high-order deep radiomic features extracted automatically from tumor images can capture tumor heterogeneity in a more efficient way. We hypothesize that MRI-based deep radiomic phenotypes have significant associations with molecular profiles of breast cancer tumors. We aim to identify deep radiomic features (DRFs) from MRI, evaluate their significance in predicting breast cancer (BC) clinical characteristics and explore their associations with multi-level genomic factors. A denoising autoencoder was built to retrospectively extract 4,096 DRFs from 110 BC patients' MRI. Visualization and clustering were applied to these DRFs. Linear Mixed Effect models were used to test their associations with multi-level genomic features (GFs) (risk genes, gene signatures, and biological pathway activities) extracted from the same patients' mRNA expression profile. A Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator model was used to identify the most predictive DRFs for each clinical characteristic (tumor size (T), lymph node metastasis (N), estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status). Thirty-six conventional radiomic features (CRFs) for 87 of the 110 BC patients provided by a previous study were used for comparison. More than 1,000 DRFs were associated with the risk genes, gene signatures, and biological pathways activities (adjusted P-value < 0.05). DRFs produced better performance in predicting T, N, ER, PR, and HER2 status (AUC > 0.9) using DRFs. These DRFs showed significant powers of stratifying patients, linking to relevant biological and clinical characteristics. As a contrast, only eight risk genes were associated with CRFs. The RFs performed worse in predicting clinical characteristics than DRFs. The deep learning-based auto MRI features perform better in predicting BC clinical characteristics, which are more significantly associated with GFs than traditional semi-auto MRI features. Our radiogenomic approach for identifying MRI-based imaging signatures may pave potential pathways for the discovery of genetic mechanisms regulating specific tumor phenotypes and may enable a more rapid innovation of novel imaging modalities, hence accelerating their translation to personalized medicine.
Background It has been believed that traditional handcrafted radiomic features extracted from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of tumors are normally shallow and low-ordered. Recent advancement in deep learning technology shows that the high-order deep radiomic features extracted automatically from tumor images can capture tumor heterogeneity in a more efficient way. We hypothesize that MRI-based deep radiomic phenotypes have significant associations with molecular profiles of breast cancer tumors. We aim to identify deep radiomic features (DRFs) from MRI, evaluate their significance in predicting breast cancer (BC) clinical characteristics and explore their associations with multi-level genomic factors. Methods A denoising autoencoder was built to retrospectively extract 4,096 DRFs from 110 BC patients' MRI. Visualization and clustering were applied to these DRFs. Linear Mixed Effect models were used to test their associations with multi-level genomic features (GFs) (risk genes, gene signatures, and biological pathway activities) extracted from the same patients' mRNA expression profile. A Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator model was used to identify the most predictive DRFs for each clinical characteristic (tumor size (T), lymph node metastasis (N), estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status). Results Thirty-six conventional radiomic features (CRFs) for 87 of the 110 BC patients provided by a previous study were used for comparison. More than 1,000 DRFs were associated with the risk genes, gene signatures, and biological pathways activities (adjusted P-value < 0.05). DRFs produced better performance in predicting T, N, ER, PR, and HER2 status (AUC > 0.9) using DRFs. These DRFs showed significant powers of stratifying patients, linking to relevant biological and clinical characteristics. As a contrast, only eight risk genes were associated with CRFs. The RFs performed worse in predicting clinical characteristics than DRFs. Conclusions The deep learning-based auto MRI features perform better in predicting BC clinical characteristics, which are more significantly associated with GFs than traditional semi-auto MRI features. Our radiogenomic approach for identifying MRI-based imaging signatures may pave potential pathways for the discovery of genetic mechanisms regulating specific tumor phenotypes and may enable a more rapid innovation of novel imaging modalities, hence accelerating their translation to personalized medicine. Keywords: Radiogenomics, Deep learning, Breast cancer, Medical imaging, Denoise autoencoder
It has been believed that traditional handcrafted radiomic features extracted from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of tumors are normally shallow and low-ordered. Recent advancement in deep learning technology shows that the high-order deep radiomic features extracted automatically from tumor images can capture tumor heterogeneity in a more efficient way. We hypothesize that MRI-based deep radiomic phenotypes have significant associations with molecular profiles of breast cancer tumors. We aim to identify deep radiomic features (DRFs) from MRI, evaluate their significance in predicting breast cancer (BC) clinical characteristics and explore their associations with multi-level genomic factors. A denoising autoencoder was built to retrospectively extract 4,096 DRFs from 110 BC patients' MRI. Visualization and clustering were applied to these DRFs. Linear Mixed Effect models were used to test their associations with multi-level genomic features (GFs) (risk genes, gene signatures, and biological pathway activities) extracted from the same patients' mRNA expression profile. A Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator model was used to identify the most predictive DRFs for each clinical characteristic (tumor size (T), lymph node metastasis (N), estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status). Thirty-six conventional radiomic features (CRFs) for 87 of the 110 BC patients provided by a previous study were used for comparison. More than 1,000 DRFs were associated with the risk genes, gene signatures, and biological pathways activities (adjusted P-value < 0.05). DRFs produced better performance in predicting T, N, ER, PR, and HER2 status (AUC > 0.9) using DRFs. These DRFs showed significant powers of stratifying patients, linking to relevant biological and clinical characteristics. As a contrast, only eight risk genes were associated with CRFs. The RFs performed worse in predicting clinical characteristics than DRFs. The deep learning-based auto MRI features perform better in predicting BC clinical characteristics, which are more significantly associated with GFs than traditional semi-auto MRI features. Our radiogenomic approach for identifying MRI-based imaging signatures may pave potential pathways for the discovery of genetic mechanisms regulating specific tumor phenotypes and may enable a more rapid innovation of novel imaging modalities, hence accelerating their translation to personalized medicine.
ArticleNumber 9
Audience Academic
Author Hu, Pingzhao
Liu, Qian
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Qian
  surname: Liu
  fullname: Liu, Qian
  organization: Department of Biochemistry and Medical Genetics, University of Manitoba, Department of Computer Science, University of Manitoba, Department of Statistics, University of Manitoba
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Pingzhao
  surname: Hu
  fullname: Hu, Pingzhao
  email: phu49@uwo.ca
  organization: Department of Biochemistry and Medical Genetics, University of Manitoba, Department of Computer Science, University of Manitoba, CancerCare Manitoba Research Institute, Department of Biochemistry, Western University
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36694221$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9kl9v0zAUxSM0xEbZF-ABWeIFHjJsx42dF6Rp4k-lIaQCz5bjXKeuUrvYzli_PW67snVCcx5iOb9z4nvveVmcOO-gKF4TfEGIqD9EhqualZhWJcZsOi03z4oziqe45JyTkwf70-I8xiXOSwhGSPOiOK3qumGUkrPidq4663twfmU1UjF6bVWy3iFvUAewRt_myK5Ub12PDKg0Bojoj00LdBCtgzd2yKfKdUgP1lmtBqQXKiidINiYrI7IOtQGUDEhrZyG8Kp4btQQ4fzuPSl-ff708-pref39y-zq8rrUNSOpbHXX1g1tO9IK0TQYGqppy7jhGBSjjc6laGF4oynuwGijGK-1Np1oK6BcVJNitvftvFrKdci1hI30ysrdgQ-9VCHfcAAJumPTVmFB6poZwRSrKaEdZ4YzaGuSvT7uvdZju4JOg0tBDUemx1-cXcje38hGcMpolQ3e3RkE_3uEmOTKRg3DoBz4MUrK62baUJ6nOinePkKXfgwutypTeQmcB3xP9SoXYJ3x-b96ayovecWmVYMZy9TFf6j8dJAHmHO1nd-x4P2RIDMJblOvxhjl7Mf8mH3zsCn_unHIWAbEHtDBxxjASG3TLmP5FnaQBMttouU-0TLXLneJlpsspY-kB_cnRdVeFDPsegj3nXtC9RdesgjB
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1002_advs_202503925
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12880_024_01255_y
crossref_primary_10_2217_pme_2022_0093
crossref_primary_10_1177_03008916251356446
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12530_024_09619_z
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heliyon_2024_e31816
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clbc_2025_08_014
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12967_025_06641_w
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12885_025_14247_0
crossref_primary_10_3389_fgene_2024_1383284
Cites_doi 10.1038/nature08460
10.1056/NEJM198510313131802
10.48550/arXiv.1701.05936
10.1083/jcb.200508196
10.1186/s13058-015-0514-2
10.1038/s41598-017-05848-2
10.1186/S13059-016-1028-7
10.1093/bioinformatics/19.2.185
10.2307/2346101
10.1016/j.molonc.2008.04.001
10.1007/s10278-013-9622-7
10.1201/9780203745502
10.1200/JCO.2008.18.1370
10.1145/1390156.1390294
10.1093/hmg/5.5.659
10.1007/s11306-009-0178-y
10.1038/srep17787
10.1007/s10479-011-0841-3
10.1038/nature11412
10.1016/j.ejso.2006.06.009
10.3390/cancers12051076
10.1038/s41467-018-03411-9
10.1093/bioinformatics/btv693
10.1042/bj3360213
10.1002/cncr.29791
10.1117/1.JMI.2.4.041007
10.18632/oncotarget.5500
10.1038/s41467-020-18703-2
10.1155/2014/986048
10.1038/s41588-018-0132-x
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright The Author(s) 2023
2023. The Author(s).
COPYRIGHT 2023 BioMed Central Ltd.
2023. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Copyright_xml – notice: The Author(s) 2023
– notice: 2023. The Author(s).
– notice: COPYRIGHT 2023 BioMed Central Ltd.
– notice: 2023. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
DBID C6C
AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
ISR
8FE
8FH
ABUWG
AFKRA
AZQEC
BBNVY
BENPR
BHPHI
CCPQU
DWQXO
GNUQQ
HCIFZ
LK8
M7P
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PKEHL
PQEST
PQGLB
PQQKQ
PQUKI
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.1186/s40364-023-00455-y
DatabaseName Springer Nature OA Free Journals
CrossRef
PubMed
Gale In Context: Science
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
ProQuest Central Essentials
Biological Science Collection
ProQuest Central
Natural Science Collection
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Central Korea
ProQuest Central Student
SciTech Premium
ProQuest Biological Science Collection
Biological Science Database
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic (New)
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest One Academic (retired)
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest Central Student
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Biological Science Collection
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
Biological Science Database
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Central Korea
Biological Science Collection
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic

Publicly Available Content Database




PubMed
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals - NZ
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: PIMPY
  name: Publicly Available Content Database
  url: http://search.proquest.com/publiccontent
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Biology
EISSN 2050-7771
EndPage 11
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_ecd45ba081664f84a46212d74f74eb61
PMC9872423
A734539044
36694221
10_1186_s40364_023_00455_y
Genre Journal Article
GeographicLocations Canada
GeographicLocations_xml – name: Canada
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: Manitoba Medical Service Foundation
  funderid: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100008795
– fundername: Canada Research Chairs Tier II Program
– fundername: CancerCare Manitoba Foundation
  funderid: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100009395
– fundername: ;
GroupedDBID 0R~
53G
5VS
8FE
8FH
AAFWJ
AAJSJ
AASML
ACGFS
ADBBV
ADRAZ
ADUKV
AFKRA
AFPKN
AHBYD
AHYZX
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMKLP
AOIJS
ASPBG
BAWUL
BBNVY
BCNDV
BENPR
BFQNJ
BHPHI
BMC
C6C
CCPQU
DIK
EBLON
EBS
GROUPED_DOAJ
HCIFZ
HYE
IAO
IHR
INH
INR
ISR
ITC
KQ8
LK8
M48
M7P
M~E
OK1
PGMZT
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PQGLB
PROAC
PUEGO
RBZ
ROL
RPM
RSV
SOJ
AAYXX
AFFHD
CITATION
NPM
ABUWG
AZQEC
DWQXO
GNUQQ
PKEHL
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c641t-bcdb692bd1b88990e92c2b47f70ea429c366c8f79c20defcfa476ccfd8b3e2783
IEDL.DBID BENPR
ISICitedReferencesCount 12
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000920061300001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 2050-7771
IngestDate Tue Oct 14 15:12:14 EDT 2025
Tue Nov 04 02:06:35 EST 2025
Thu Oct 02 03:00:59 EDT 2025
Mon Oct 06 16:35:48 EDT 2025
Tue Nov 11 09:53:05 EST 2025
Tue Nov 04 17:24:09 EST 2025
Thu Nov 13 16:15:51 EST 2025
Mon Jul 21 05:56:46 EDT 2025
Tue Nov 18 22:16:05 EST 2025
Sat Nov 29 01:34:22 EST 2025
Sat Sep 06 07:27:45 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords Deep learning
Breast cancer
Medical imaging
Radiogenomics
Denoise autoencoder
Language English
License 2023. The Author(s).
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c641t-bcdb692bd1b88990e92c2b47f70ea429c366c8f79c20defcfa476ccfd8b3e2783
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://www.proquest.com/docview/2777780205?pq-origsite=%requestingapplication%
PMID 36694221
PQID 2777780205
PQPubID 2040162
PageCount 11
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_ecd45ba081664f84a46212d74f74eb61
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9872423
proquest_miscellaneous_2769592702
proquest_journals_2777780205
gale_infotracmisc_A734539044
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A734539044
gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A734539044
pubmed_primary_36694221
crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_s40364_023_00455_y
crossref_primary_10_1186_s40364_023_00455_y
springer_journals_10_1186_s40364_023_00455_y
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2023-01-24
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2023-01-24
PublicationDate_xml – month: 01
  year: 2023
  text: 2023-01-24
  day: 24
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace London
PublicationPlace_xml – name: London
– name: England
PublicationTitle Biomarker research
PublicationTitleAbbrev Biomark Res
PublicationTitleAlternate Biomark Res
PublicationYear 2023
Publisher BioMed Central
BioMed Central Ltd
Springer Nature B.V
BMC
Publisher_xml – name: BioMed Central
– name: BioMed Central Ltd
– name: Springer Nature B.V
– name: BMC
References M Fan (455_CR3) 2020; 11
ES Burnside (455_CR4) 2016; 122
M Nair (455_CR33) 2006; 173
B Gyorffy (455_CR37) 2015; 17
M Tan (455_CR39) 2019
455_CR20
455_CR27
E Kolpakova (455_CR31) 2015; 336
AM Hoff (455_CR29) 2015; 6
DA Barbie (455_CR21) 2009
F Chollet (455_CR11) 2016
L Wu (455_CR30) 2018; 50
JS Baxter (455_CR17) 2018
L Cayuela (455_CR23) 2010
RC Seeger (455_CR34) 1985; 313
E Chen (455_CR32) 1996; 5
W Guo (455_CR6) 2015; 2
B Hochberg (455_CR24) 1995
L Wu (455_CR18) 2018
M Davidian (455_CR22) 2017
S Zhao (455_CR14) 2014
B Bm (455_CR13) 2003; 19
455_CR10
M Sugimoto (455_CR38) 2010; 6
455_CR16
B Li (455_CR25) 2016; 17
M Van Goethem (455_CR1) 2006; 32
455_CR35
K Clark (455_CR8) 2013; 26
L Fass (455_CR2) 2008; 2
455_CR28
DMA Gendoo (455_CR19) 2016
L Van Der Maaten (455_CR15) 2008; 9
PS Bernard (455_CR36) 2009; 27
Y Zhu (455_CR5) 2015; 5
DC Koboldt (455_CR9) 2012; 490
YW Jin (455_CR26) 2020; 12
Z Li (455_CR7) 2017; 7
S Ruder (455_CR12) 2016
References_xml – year: 2009
  ident: 455_CR21
  publication-title: Nature
  doi: 10.1038/nature08460
– volume: 313
  start-page: 1111
  year: 1985
  ident: 455_CR34
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
  doi: 10.1056/NEJM198510313131802
– ident: 455_CR16
  doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1701.05936
– volume: 173
  start-page: 253
  year: 2006
  ident: 455_CR33
  publication-title: J Cell Biol
  doi: 10.1083/jcb.200508196
– volume: 17
  start-page: 1
  year: 2015
  ident: 455_CR37
  publication-title: Breast Cancer Res
  doi: 10.1186/s13058-015-0514-2
– volume: 7
  start-page: 1
  year: 2017
  ident: 455_CR7
  publication-title: Sci Rep
  doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-05848-2
– volume: 17
  start-page: 174
  year: 2016
  ident: 455_CR25
  publication-title: Genome Biol
  doi: 10.1186/S13059-016-1028-7
– volume: 19
  start-page: 185
  year: 2003
  ident: 455_CR13
  publication-title: Bioinformatics
  doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/19.2.185
– start-page: 1
  volume-title: An overview of gradient descent optimization algorithms
  year: 2016
  ident: 455_CR12
– ident: 455_CR20
– year: 1995
  ident: 455_CR24
  publication-title: J R Stat Soc
  doi: 10.2307/2346101
– volume: 2
  start-page: 115
  year: 2008
  ident: 455_CR2
  publication-title: Mol Oncol
  doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2008.04.001
– volume: 26
  start-page: 1045
  year: 2013
  ident: 455_CR8
  publication-title: J Digit Imaging
  doi: 10.1007/s10278-013-9622-7
– year: 2017
  ident: 455_CR22
  publication-title: Nonlinear models for repeated measurement data.
  doi: 10.1201/9780203745502
– volume: 27
  start-page: 1160
  year: 2009
  ident: 455_CR36
  publication-title: J Clin Oncol
  doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.18.1370
– ident: 455_CR35
– ident: 455_CR10
  doi: 10.1145/1390156.1390294
– volume-title: Modelos lineales mixtos en R
  year: 2010
  ident: 455_CR23
– ident: 455_CR28
– volume: 5
  start-page: 659
  year: 1996
  ident: 455_CR32
  publication-title: Hum Mol Genet
  doi: 10.1093/hmg/5.5.659
– volume: 6
  start-page: 78
  year: 2010
  ident: 455_CR38
  publication-title: Metabolomics
  doi: 10.1007/s11306-009-0178-y
– volume: 5
  start-page: 17787
  year: 2015
  ident: 455_CR5
  publication-title: Sci Rep
  doi: 10.1038/srep17787
– volume: 9
  start-page: 2579
  year: 2008
  ident: 455_CR15
  publication-title: J Mach Learn Res
  doi: 10.1007/s10479-011-0841-3
– volume: 490
  start-page: 61
  year: 2012
  ident: 455_CR9
  publication-title: Nature
  doi: 10.1038/nature11412
– volume: 32
  start-page: 901
  year: 2006
  ident: 455_CR1
  publication-title: Eur J Surg Oncol
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2006.06.009
– volume: 12
  start-page: 1076
  year: 2020
  ident: 455_CR26
  publication-title: Cancers (Basel)
  doi: 10.3390/cancers12051076
– start-page: 1
  volume-title: Keras Blog
  year: 2016
  ident: 455_CR11
– year: 2018
  ident: 455_CR17
  publication-title: Nat Commun
  doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03411-9
– year: 2016
  ident: 455_CR19
  publication-title: Bioinformatics
  doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv693
– volume: 336
  start-page: 213
  year: 2015
  ident: 455_CR31
  publication-title: Biochem J
  doi: 10.1042/bj3360213
– volume: 122
  start-page: 748
  year: 2016
  ident: 455_CR4
  publication-title: Cancer
  doi: 10.1002/cncr.29791
– volume: 2
  start-page: 041007
  year: 2015
  ident: 455_CR6
  publication-title: J Med Imaging
  doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.2.4.041007
– volume: 6
  start-page: 36587
  year: 2015
  ident: 455_CR29
  publication-title: Oncotarget
  doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.5500
– volume: 11
  start-page: 1
  year: 2020
  ident: 455_CR3
  publication-title: Nat Commun
  doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18703-2
– year: 2014
  ident: 455_CR14
  publication-title: Biomed Res Int
  doi: 10.1155/2014/986048
– ident: 455_CR27
– volume-title: Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Machine Learning, Long Beach, California, PMLR 97
  year: 2019
  ident: 455_CR39
– year: 2018
  ident: 455_CR18
  publication-title: Nat Genet
  doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0132-x
– volume: 50
  start-page: 968
  year: 2018
  ident: 455_CR30
  publication-title: Nat Genet
  doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0132-x
SSID ssj0000884119
Score 2.3073375
Snippet Background It has been believed that traditional handcrafted radiomic features extracted from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of tumors are normally shallow...
It has been believed that traditional handcrafted radiomic features extracted from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of tumors are normally shallow and...
Background It has been believed that traditional handcrafted radiomic features extracted from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of tumors are normally shallow...
BackgroundIt has been believed that traditional handcrafted radiomic features extracted from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of tumors are normally shallow...
Abstract Background It has been believed that traditional handcrafted radiomic features extracted from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of tumors are normally...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
gale
pubmed
crossref
springer
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 9
SubjectTerms Algorithms
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Biomedicine
Breast cancer
Cancer Research
Classification
Deep learning
Denoise autoencoder
Disease management
Epidermal growth factor
ErbB-2 protein
Estrogen
Estrogen receptors
Gene expression
Genes
Genomics
Lymph nodes
Magnetic resonance imaging
Medical imaging
Medical imaging equipment
Medical research
Medicine, Experimental
Metastases
Metastasis
Patients
Phenotypes
Precision medicine
Progesterone
Radiogenomic biomarkers
Radiogenomics
Radiomics
RNA
Tumors
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELZQBRIXxJvQggxC4gBRE6-fx4Ko4ECFFpB6s_yESDRbbXYr9t_jcZLtpgi4kON6LMXzjT0zm_E3CL1IEEOgmxBwIZZUcV9axmwpGFHEcMfqUOVmE-LkRJ6eqk87rb6gJqynB-4Vdxicp8wa6A_BaZTUUJ5OWy9oFDTYPvGphNpJpvIZLCWtazXekpH8sKPwxa1MLqqEMIaVm4knyoT9vx_LO37pas3klQ-n2R8d30a3hkASH_ULuIOuhfYuutG3ltzcQz_nxjcLYGA9axw2lyDgRcQ-hHP8cY6bs9yjCMeQ6T07DP_K4nHS0M67w6b1eLxBid2U4Rk3LbZQ2L7CDgxoeR99PX735e37cuiyUDpO61VpnbdcEetrK1PyVQVFHLFURFEFk7yVm3HuZBTKkcqH6KKhgjsXvbSzAH06HqC9dtGGRwiLlPsFTyrjk5Bj0dQWAggu6pQJ8yoWqB41rt1AQQ6dMH7onIpIrnuUdEJJZ5T0pkCvtnPOewKOv0q_ASC3kkCenX9IJqUHk9L_MqkCPQcz0ECP0UL9zTez7jr94fNcH4kZZTNVUVqgl4NQXKQ1ODNcZ0iaAGwmkgcTybR_3XR4tDY9nB-dJiI9MoXyrEDPtsMwE2ri2rBYgwxXTMF9wgI97I1zu-6EWdqEJC1FTMx2opjpSNt8z-ziSgqIsQv0ejTwy9f6s-If_w_F76ObJG_QuiT0AO2tluvwBF13F6umWz7NO_wXyVZTNA
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
– databaseName: Springer Standard Collection
  dbid: RSV
  link: http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwELaggNQLb2igIIOQOIDVxOvY8bEgKjhQoS2g3iw_SySaVJtdxP57PE6yJeUhQY7xWIrn4RnHM98g9CyKGALdKAHrA2GSO2LK0hBRUkk1t2Xh89RsQhweVsfH8sNQFNaN2e7jlWTaqZNZV3yvY3BlRqKPIRCHlGR9GV0B8BLoWzA_-rz5sxLthhWFHCtkfjt14oUSWP-vW_JPPulivuSFS9Pkiw5u_N8qbqLrQ-yJ93tluYUu-eY2utZ3o1zfQd_n2tUtgLae1hbrc7nhNmDn_Rl-P8f1aWprhINPiKAdhh-5eJw0dADvsG4cHosusZ2CQuO6wQZy4ZfYgs4t7qJPB28-vn5LhsYMxHJWLImxznBJjStMFc9ruZfUUsNEELnX0cHZGee2CkJamjsfbNBMcGuDq8zMQ2uPe2iraRu_g7CIx0XvaK5dJLJl0IWBmIOLIh6eeR4yVIyCUnZALYfmGV9VOr1UXPUcVZGjKnFUrTP0YjPnrMfs-Cv1K5D_hhLwttOLdnGiBvNV3jpWGg1dSjgLFdOMR5_vBAuCecOLDD0F7VGAqNFAys6JXnWdenc0V_tixsqZzBnL0POBKLRxDVYPFRCREyCbCeXuhDKavJ0Oj0qqhi2nU1TEp4rRf5mhJ5thmAlpdI1vV0DDZSmhBDFD93ud3qw7yizaLY1LERNtnzBmOtLUXxIguawEhOUZejnq_Pln_ZnxD_6N_CHapslsCkLZLtpaLlb-Ebpqvy3rbvE4bQE_AL9gWGQ
  priority: 102
  providerName: Springer Nature
Title Radiogenomic association of deep MR imaging features with genomic profiles and clinical characteristics in breast cancer
URI https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40364-023-00455-y
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36694221
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2777780205
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2769592702
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC9872423
https://doaj.org/article/ecd45ba081664f84a46212d74f74eb61
Volume 11
WOSCitedRecordID wos000920061300001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVADU
  databaseName: Open Access: BioMedCentral Open Access Titles
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 2050-7771
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0000884119
  issn: 2050-7771
  databaseCode: RBZ
  dateStart: 20130101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.biomedcentral.com/search/
  providerName: BioMedCentral
– providerCode: PRVAON
  databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals - NZ
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 2050-7771
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0000884119
  issn: 2050-7771
  databaseCode: DOA
  dateStart: 20130101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.doaj.org/
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
– providerCode: PRVHPJ
  databaseName: ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 2050-7771
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0000884119
  issn: 2050-7771
  databaseCode: M~E
  dateStart: 20130101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://road.issn.org
  providerName: ISSN International Centre
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 2050-7771
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0000884119
  issn: 2050-7771
  databaseCode: BENPR
  dateStart: 20150101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.proquest.com/central
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: Biological Science Database
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 2050-7771
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0000884119
  issn: 2050-7771
  databaseCode: M7P
  dateStart: 20150101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: http://search.proquest.com/biologicalscijournals
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: Publicly Available Content Database
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 2050-7771
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0000884119
  issn: 2050-7771
  databaseCode: PIMPY
  dateStart: 20150101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: http://search.proquest.com/publiccontent
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVAVX
  databaseName: Springer Standard Collection
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 2050-7771
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0000884119
  issn: 2050-7771
  databaseCode: RSV
  dateStart: 20131201
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://link.springer.com/search?facet-content-type=%22Journal%22
  providerName: Springer Nature
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpR1db9Mw0GIdSLzw_REYlUFIPEC0xHXs5AltaBN7WFV1gMaT5c8RiSWlaRH99_jcpCVD7IW8JT5LOd-nz-c7hF57EoOj6ymgrYtpwUysskzFPCMFkUxnqU1Cswk-Hufn58WkDbg1bVplpxODoja1hhj5PuH-yb1zk72f_YihaxScrrYtNHbQLlQqIwO0e3g0nkw3URYvQ9QPdLdlcrbfUDh5i72pisGdyeJVzyKFwv1_q-c_7NPV3MkrB6jBLh3f_V-M7qE7rUeKD9YsdB_dsNUDdGvdo3L1EP2aSlPWUMr1stRYbqmJa4eNtTN8OsXlZWh2hJ0NdUIbDOFd3E1q-4I3WFYGd1cxse6XisZlhRVkyC-wBk6cP0Kfj48-ffgYt-0aYs1ouoiVNooVRJlU5X4Xl9iCaKIodzyx0ps9PWJM544XmiTGOu0k5UxrZ3I1stDw4zEaVHVlnyLM_SbSGpJI44F05mSqwBNhPPVbapa4CKUdyYRua5lDS43vIuxpcibWZBaezCKQWawi9HYzZ7au5HEt9CFwwgYSqnCHD_X8QrRCLaw2NFMSepcw6nIqKfOegOHUcWoVSyP0CvhIQJ2NChJ5LuSyacTJ2VQc8BHNRkVCaYTetECu9jho2d6L8CsBtOlB7vUgvSLQ_eGOz0SriBqxZbIIvdwMw0xIrqtsvQQYVmQFXEyM0JM1d2_w9jTz0kw8KrzH972F6Y9U5bdQprzIOTjrEXrXScj2t_698M-ux-I5uk2C7KYxoXtosJgv7Qt0U_9clM18iHb4eT5slcAwxFeGkM078d8mJ6eTr_5tevblN5nkaIU
linkProvider ProQuest
linkToHtml http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMw1V1Lb9QwELbKFgQX3o9AAYNAHCBq4jh2ckCohVat2q6qpUi9GcePEokmy2YX2D_Fb8STxy4porce2ON6vNrxPDxje-ZD6IUTMQS6TgLKWJ-mTPtZHGc-j0lKJFNxaIIabIIPh8nxcXq4gn51tTDwrLLzibWj1qWCM_J1wt0nccFN_G78zQfUKLhd7SA0GrXYM_MfLmWr3u5-cPJ9Scj21tH7Hb9FFfAVo-HUz5TOWEoyHWaJSzYCkxJFMsotD4x03llFjKnE8lSRQBurrKScKWV1kkUGcCnc715CqzSiMR2g1c2t4eFocarjbJaGYdpV5yRsvaJw0-e7rdGH8Cn2570dsAYK-Hs7-GM_PPtW88yFbb0Pbt_431bwJrreRtx4ozGRW2jFFLfRlQaDc34H_RxJnZfQqvY0V1gutRWXFmtjxvhghPPTGswJW1P3Qa0wHF_jblKLe15hWWjclZpi1W-FjfMCZ1ABMMUKLG1yF326ELbvoUFRFuYBwtwlyUaTQGpHpGIrwwwiLcbDMIpYYD0UdioiVNurHSBDvoo6Z0uYaNRKOLUStVqJuYdeL-aMm04l51JvguYtKKHLeP1FOTkRrdMSRmkaZxKwWRi1CZWUuUhHc2o5NRkLPfQc9FZAH5ECHiqdyFlVid2PI7HBnX1EaUCph161RLZ0PCjZ1n24lQDZ9CjXepTO0an-cKfXonW0lVgqtYeeLYZhJjweLEw5AxqWxikUXnrofmNNC76dzJy3Io4V3rOz3sL0R4r8S92GPU04JCMeetNZ5PJv_XvhH57PxVN0defoYF_s7w73HqFrpPYboU_oGhpMJzPzGF1W36d5NXnSuh6MPl-0rf4GelfCoQ
linkToPdf http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Zb9QwELagHOKF-wgUMAiJB4iaZB07fizHigpYVVtAfbN8lkg0WW2yiP33eJxk25RDQuQxHkvxHPZMPPMNQs-8iMHR9RLQ1sWEUxOrPFcxyzOeSarz1Cah2QSbzYrDQ75_qoo_ZLsPV5JdTQOgNFXtzsK4zsQLutMQuD6L_XkTg0-Sx-vz6AIBNDSI1w--bP6yeBsiacqHapnfTh2dSAG4_9ft-dT5dDZ38swFajiXptf-f0XX0dXeJ8W7nRLdQOdsdRNd6rpUrm-hH3NpyhrAXI9LjeWJPHHtsLF2gT_OcXkc2h1hZwNSaIPhBy8eJvWdwRssK4OHYkysx2DRuKywghz5FmvQxeVt9Hn69tPrd3HfsCHWlKRtrLRRlGfKpKrwcVxieaYzRZhjiZX-4NMTSnXhGNdZYqzTThJGtXamUBMLLT_uoK2qruw9hJkPI63JEmk8kc6dTBX4IpSlPqimiYtQOghN6B7NHJpqfBMhqimo6DgqPEdF4KhYR-jFZs6iw_L4K_Ur0IUNJeBwhxf18kj0Zi2sNiRXErqXUOIKIgn1voBhxDFiFU0j9BQ0SQDSRgWpPEdy1TRi72AudtmE5BOeEBKh5z2Rq_0atOwrIzwnQDYjyu0Rpd8K9Hh4UFjRb0WNyJh_Ch8V5BF6shmGmZBeV9l6BTSU5xxKEyN0t9Pvzbq9zLw9Z34pbKT5I8aMR6ryawAq5wUDdz1CLwf9P_msPzP-_r-RP0aX999MxYe92fsH6EoWLCiNM7KNttrlyj5EF_X3tmyWj8LO8BO_RGQs
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Radiogenomic+association+of+deep+MR+imaging+features+with+genomic+profiles+and+clinical+characteristics+in+breast+cancer&rft.jtitle=Biomarker+research&rft.au=Liu%2C+Qian&rft.au=Hu%2C+Pingzhao&rft.date=2023-01-24&rft.pub=BioMed+Central+Ltd&rft.issn=2050-7771&rft.eissn=2050-7771&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=1&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs40364-023-00455-y&rft.externalDBID=ISR&rft.externalDocID=A734539044
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2050-7771&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2050-7771&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2050-7771&client=summon