The standardization of clinical ethics consultation and technique’s “long encirclement” of humanity: a response to Brummett and Muaygil

In their recent article, Brummett and Muaygil reject Bishop et al.’s framing of the debate over standardization in clinical ethics consultation (CEC) “as one between pro-credentialing procedural and anti-credentialing phenomenological,” claiming that this framing “amounts to a false dichotomy betwee...

Celý popis

Uložené v:

Podrobná bibliografia
Vydané v:	Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM Ročník 16; číslo 1; s. 13 - 5
Hlavní autori:	Parks, Benjamin N., Mason, Jordan
Médium:	Journal Article
Jazyk:	English
Vydavateľské údaje:	London BioMed Central 12.10.2021 BioMed Central Ltd Springer Nature B.V BMC
Predmet:	Adaptation Bioethics Clinical ethics consultation Commentary Credentialing Education Ellul, Jacques Ethicists Ethics Ethics Consultation Ethics, Clinical Humans Medical ethics Methods Phenomenology Philosophy Philosophy of Medicine Proceduralism Propaganda Reference Standards Standardization Theory of Medicine/Bioethics United States United States Saudi Arabia United States > US California Phenomenology Credentialing Clinical ethics consultation Proceduralism Standardization
ISSN:	1747-5341, 1747-5341
On-line prístup:	Získať plný text
Tagy:	Pridať tag Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!

Buďte prvý, kto okomentuje tento záznam!