The standardization of clinical ethics consultation and technique’s “long encirclement” of humanity: a response to Brummett and Muaygil

In their recent article, Brummett and Muaygil reject Bishop et al.’s framing of the debate over standardization in clinical ethics consultation (CEC) “as one between pro-credentialing procedural and anti-credentialing phenomenological,” claiming that this framing “amounts to a false dichotomy betwee...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM Vol. 16; no. 1; pp. 13 - 5
Main Authors:	Parks, Benjamin N., Mason, Jordan
Format:	Journal Article
Language:	English
Published:	London BioMed Central 12.10.2021 BioMed Central Ltd Springer Nature B.V BMC
Subjects:	Adaptation Bioethics Clinical ethics consultation Commentary Credentialing Education Ellul, Jacques Ethicists Ethics Ethics Consultation Ethics, Clinical Humans Medical ethics Methods Phenomenology Philosophy Philosophy of Medicine Proceduralism Propaganda Reference Standards Standardization Theory of Medicine/Bioethics United States United States Saudi Arabia United States > US California Phenomenology Credentialing Clinical ethics consultation Proceduralism Standardization
ISSN:	1747-5341, 1747-5341
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Be the first to leave a comment!