The standardization of clinical ethics consultation and technique’s “long encirclement” of humanity: a response to Brummett and Muaygil
In their recent article, Brummett and Muaygil reject Bishop et al.’s framing of the debate over standardization in clinical ethics consultation (CEC) “as one between pro-credentialing procedural and anti-credentialing phenomenological,” claiming that this framing “amounts to a false dichotomy betwee...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM Vol. 16; no. 1; pp. 13 - 5 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
London
BioMed Central
12.10.2021
BioMed Central Ltd Springer Nature B.V BMC |
| Subjects: | |
| ISSN: | 1747-5341, 1747-5341 |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Abstract | In their recent article, Brummett and Muaygil reject Bishop et al.’s framing of the debate over standardization in clinical ethics consultation (CEC) “as one between pro-credentialing procedural and anti-credentialing phenomenological,” claiming that this framing “amounts to a false dichotomy between two extreme approaches to CEC.” Instead of accepting proceduralism and phenomenology as a binary, Brummett and Muaygil propose that these two views should be seen as the extreme ends of a spectrum upon which CEC should be done. However, as evidenced by several inconsistencies within their article, they have failed to fully appreciate the concern animating Bishop et al.’s proposal. Additionally, because of this failure, they do not seem to realize that credentialing ethicists for CEC will only create different problems in Saudi Arabia even as it possibly solves some of the current problems they identify. In this commentary, we highlight and clarify Brummet and Muaygil’s five misunderstandings of Bishop et al. This leads us to conclude that while they claim to be advocating a middle way between proceduralism and phenomenology, in fact they would like for us to standardize another proceduralism, albeit one that incorporates some of the “qualitative” values of American bioethics. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | In their recent article, Brummett and Muaygil reject Bishop et al.'s framing of the debate over standardization in clinical ethics consultation (CEC) "as one between pro-credentialing procedural and anti-credentialing phenomenological," claiming that this framing "amounts to a false dichotomy between two extreme approaches to CEC." Instead of accepting proceduralism and phenomenology as a binary, Brummett and Muaygil propose that these two views should be seen as the extreme ends of a spectrum upon which CEC should be done. However, as evidenced by several inconsistencies within their article, they have failed to fully appreciate the concern animating Bishop et al.'s proposal. Additionally, because of this failure, they do not seem to realize that credentialing ethicists for CEC will only create different problems in Saudi Arabia even as it possibly solves some of the current problems they identify. In this commentary, we highlight and clarify Brummet and Muaygil's five misunderstandings of Bishop et al. This leads us to conclude that while they claim to be advocating a middle way between proceduralism and phenomenology, in fact they would like for us to standardize another proceduralism, albeit one that incorporates some of the "qualitative" values of American bioethics.In their recent article, Brummett and Muaygil reject Bishop et al.'s framing of the debate over standardization in clinical ethics consultation (CEC) "as one between pro-credentialing procedural and anti-credentialing phenomenological," claiming that this framing "amounts to a false dichotomy between two extreme approaches to CEC." Instead of accepting proceduralism and phenomenology as a binary, Brummett and Muaygil propose that these two views should be seen as the extreme ends of a spectrum upon which CEC should be done. However, as evidenced by several inconsistencies within their article, they have failed to fully appreciate the concern animating Bishop et al.'s proposal. Additionally, because of this failure, they do not seem to realize that credentialing ethicists for CEC will only create different problems in Saudi Arabia even as it possibly solves some of the current problems they identify. In this commentary, we highlight and clarify Brummet and Muaygil's five misunderstandings of Bishop et al. This leads us to conclude that while they claim to be advocating a middle way between proceduralism and phenomenology, in fact they would like for us to standardize another proceduralism, albeit one that incorporates some of the "qualitative" values of American bioethics. In their recent article, Brummett and Muaygil reject Bishop et al.’s framing of the debate over standardization in clinical ethics consultation (CEC) “as one between pro-credentialing procedural and anti-credentialing phenomenological,” claiming that this framing “amounts to a false dichotomy between two extreme approaches to CEC.” Instead of accepting proceduralism and phenomenology as a binary, Brummett and Muaygil propose that these two views should be seen as the extreme ends of a spectrum upon which CEC should be done. However, as evidenced by several inconsistencies within their article, they have failed to fully appreciate the concern animating Bishop et al.’s proposal. Additionally, because of this failure, they do not seem to realize that credentialing ethicists for CEC will only create different problems in Saudi Arabia even as it possibly solves some of the current problems they identify. In this commentary, we highlight and clarify Brummet and Muaygil’s five misunderstandings of Bishop et al. This leads us to conclude that while they claim to be advocating a middle way between proceduralism and phenomenology, in fact they would like for us to standardize another proceduralism, albeit one that incorporates some of the “qualitative” values of American bioethics. In their recent article, Brummett and Muaygil reject Bishop et al.'s framing of the debate over standardization in clinical ethics consultation (CEC) "as one between pro-credentialing procedural and anti-credentialing phenomenological," claiming that this framing "amounts to a false dichotomy between two extreme approaches to CEC." Instead of accepting proceduralism and phenomenology as a binary, Brummett and Muaygil propose that these two views should be seen as the extreme ends of a spectrum upon which CEC should be done. However, as evidenced by several inconsistencies within their article, they have failed to fully appreciate the concern animating Bishop et al.'s proposal. Additionally, because of this failure, they do not seem to realize that credentialing ethicists for CEC will only create different problems in Saudi Arabia even as it possibly solves some of the current problems they identify. In this commentary, we highlight and clarify Brummet and Muaygil's five misunderstandings of Bishop et al. This leads us to conclude that while they claim to be advocating a middle way between proceduralism and phenomenology, in fact they would like for us to standardize another proceduralism, albeit one that incorporates some of the "qualitative" values of American bioethics. Keywords: Standardization, Clinical ethics consultation, Proceduralism, Phenomenology, Credentialing Abstract In their recent article, Brummett and Muaygil reject Bishop et al.’s framing of the debate over standardization in clinical ethics consultation (CEC) “as one between pro-credentialing procedural and anti-credentialing phenomenological,” claiming that this framing “amounts to a false dichotomy between two extreme approaches to CEC.” Instead of accepting proceduralism and phenomenology as a binary, Brummett and Muaygil propose that these two views should be seen as the extreme ends of a spectrum upon which CEC should be done. However, as evidenced by several inconsistencies within their article, they have failed to fully appreciate the concern animating Bishop et al.’s proposal. Additionally, because of this failure, they do not seem to realize that credentialing ethicists for CEC will only create different problems in Saudi Arabia even as it possibly solves some of the current problems they identify. In this commentary, we highlight and clarify Brummet and Muaygil’s five misunderstandings of Bishop et al. This leads us to conclude that while they claim to be advocating a middle way between proceduralism and phenomenology, in fact they would like for us to standardize another proceduralism, albeit one that incorporates some of the “qualitative” values of American bioethics. |
| ArticleNumber | 13 |
| Audience | Academic |
| Author | Mason, Jordan Parks, Benjamin N. |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Benjamin N. orcidid: 0000-0003-4585-9022 surname: Parks fullname: Parks, Benjamin N. email: Benjamin.Parks@mercycollege.edu organization: Mercy College of Ohio – sequence: 2 givenname: Jordan surname: Mason fullname: Mason, Jordan organization: Albert Gnaegi Center for Health Care Ethics, Saint Louis University |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34641906$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNp9kstu1DAUhiNURC_wAiyQJTawSPEtjocFUqm4jFSEBGVtOY6T8Sixp7aDGFbzAjwAErzcPAmeSQszFaqycGR__-9zjv_j7MA6q7PsMYKnCHH2IiACEcwhRjmECOF8eS87QiUt84JQdLDzf5gdhzCHkBa0hA-yQ0IZRRPIjrIflzMNQpS2lr4232U0zgLXANUZa5TsgI4zowJQzoahi-N5okHUambN1aDXq58BrFe_OmdboK0yXnW61zauV783TrOhl9bE5UsggddhkYw0iA689kPf6xi3bh8GuWxN9zC738gu6EfX60n25e2by_P3-cXHd9Pzs4tcpbpjTvCkxJSWpWRM1aRSDas0VFArxKmGFadNDSd1UU4KVEtWo6KpCFaMNUhVCkNykk1H39rJuVh400u_FE4asd1wvhXSR5MaERXkivFJWaTLKJNcNlJy2FCFNEUVJcnr1ei1GKpe1yp17mW3Z7p_Ys1MtO6r4AUsEcPJ4Nm1gXdpniGK3gSlu05a7YYgcMERx4hSntCnt9C5G7xNo9pQBJESlztUK1MDxjYu3as2puKMccQIpHhT9-l_qPTVujfpuXVj0v6e4PmeIDFRf4utHEIQ08-f9tknu0P5O42b4CWAj4DyLgSvG6HMmK5UhekEgmKTcTFmXKSMi23GxTJJ8S3pjfudIjKKQoJtq_2_yd2h-gPFcRIP |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1017_S0963180124000732 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1515/9781503616738 10.1007/s10730-010-9123-8 10.2307/j.ctvpj7br6 10.1186/s13010-021-00099-6 10.7551/mitpress/9780262029124.003.0002 10.1007/978-3-319-90955-4_13 10.1007/s10730-009-9101-1 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | The Author(s) 2021 2021. The Author(s). COPYRIGHT 2021 BioMed Central Ltd. 2021. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: The Author(s) 2021 – notice: 2021. The Author(s). – notice: COPYRIGHT 2021 BioMed Central Ltd. – notice: 2021. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
| DBID | C6C AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM ISR 3V. 7X7 7XB 88C 88E 8FI 8FJ 8FK AABKS ABSDQ ABUWG AFKRA AZQEC BENPR CCPQU DWQXO FYUFA GHDGH K9. M0S M0T M1P PGAAH PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM DOA |
| DOI | 10.1186/s13010-021-00112-y |
| DatabaseName | SpringerOpen Free (Free internet resource, activated by CARLI) CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Gale In Context: Science ProQuest Central (Corporate) Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Hospital Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) Philosophy Collection Philosophy Database ProQuest Central ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central Essentials - QC ProQuest Central ProQuest One ProQuest Central Korea Proquest Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition) Healthcare Administration Database Medical Database ProQuest One Religion & Philosophy Proquest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic (retired) ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest Central China ProQuest One Religion & Philosophy Philosophy Collection ProQuest Central ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection Health Research Premium Collection Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Health Management ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Health Management (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) Philosophy Database MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE Publicly Available Content Database CrossRef |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: PIMPY name: Publicly Available Content Database url: http://search.proquest.com/publiccontent sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Medicine Education Philosophy |
| EISSN | 1747-5341 |
| EndPage | 5 |
| ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_b08c689757a646a8afaa80f4c1e41b43 PMC8507162 A681630423 34641906 10_1186_s13010_021_00112_y |
| Genre | Letter Commentary Correspondence |
| GeographicLocations | United States Saudi Arabia United States--US California |
| GeographicLocations_xml | – name: United States – name: Saudi Arabia – name: United States--US – name: California |
| GroupedDBID | --- 0R~ 123 29O 2WC 2XV 4.4 44B 53G 5VS 7X7 88E 8FI 8FJ AABKS AAFWJ AAJSJ AASML AAWTL ABDBF ABIVO ABSDQ ABUWG ACGFO ACGFS ACUHS ADBBV ADRAZ ADUKV AFKRA AFPKN AHBYD AHYZX ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMKLP AMTXH AOIJS AQUVI BAPOH BAWUL BCNDV BENPR BFQNJ BMC BPHCQ BVXVI C6C CCPQU CS3 DIK E3Z EBD EBLON EBS EMOBN ESX F5P FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HMCUK HYE IAO IHR INH INR IPY ISR ITC KQ8 M0T M1P M48 M~E O5R O5S OK1 OVT P2P PGAAH PGMZT PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PPXIY PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO PUEGO RBZ RNS ROL RPM RSV SHS SOJ SV3 TR2 TUS UKHRP WOQ WOW ~8M AAYXX AFFHD CITATION -A0 3V. ACRMQ ADINQ C24 CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7XB 8FK AZQEC DWQXO K9. PKEHL PQEST PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c641t-329724477a66cd3bcf6be0c0ec184e0b84fd09d57951da6d15fb32c66f1cbc203 |
| IEDL.DBID | DOA |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 1 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000706723000001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 1747-5341 |
| IngestDate | Fri Oct 03 12:50:43 EDT 2025 Tue Nov 04 01:38:17 EST 2025 Thu Oct 02 12:15:04 EDT 2025 Sun Oct 19 01:22:58 EDT 2025 Tue Nov 11 10:08:08 EST 2025 Tue Nov 04 18:08:27 EST 2025 Thu Nov 13 15:53:34 EST 2025 Thu Jan 02 22:55:09 EST 2025 Sat Nov 29 06:29:04 EST 2025 Tue Nov 18 20:52:07 EST 2025 Sat Sep 06 07:29:28 EDT 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 1 |
| Keywords | Phenomenology Credentialing Clinical ethics consultation Proceduralism Standardization |
| Language | English |
| License | 2021. The Author(s). Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c641t-329724477a66cd3bcf6be0c0ec184e0b84fd09d57951da6d15fb32c66f1cbc203 |
| Notes | SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Commentary-1 content type line 14 content type line 23 ObjectType-Correspondence-1 |
| ORCID | 0000-0003-4585-9022 |
| OpenAccessLink | https://doaj.org/article/b08c689757a646a8afaa80f4c1e41b43 |
| PMID | 34641906 |
| PQID | 2583137278 |
| PQPubID | 54866 |
| PageCount | 5 |
| ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_b08c689757a646a8afaa80f4c1e41b43 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8507162 proquest_miscellaneous_2581821448 proquest_journals_2583137278 gale_infotracmisc_A681630423 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A681630423 gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A681630423 pubmed_primary_34641906 crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_s13010_021_00112_y crossref_primary_10_1186_s13010_021_00112_y springer_journals_10_1186_s13010_021_00112_y |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2021-10-12 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2021-10-12 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 10 year: 2021 text: 2021-10-12 day: 12 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | London |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: London – name: England |
| PublicationTitle | Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM |
| PublicationTitleAbbrev | Philos Ethics Humanit Med |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Philos Ethics Humanit Med |
| PublicationYear | 2021 |
| Publisher | BioMed Central BioMed Central Ltd Springer Nature B.V BMC |
| Publisher_xml | – name: BioMed Central – name: BioMed Central Ltd – name: Springer Nature B.V – name: BMC |
| References | M Heidegger (112_CR9) 1993 112_CR6 J Ellul (112_CR8) 1964 B Stiegler (112_CR10) 1998 JP Bishop (112_CR4) 2009; 21 112_CR3 112_CR2 112_CR1 JP Bishop (112_CR5) 2010; 22 J Ellul (112_CR7) 1965 |
| References_xml | – volume-title: Technics and time, 1: the fault of Epimetheus. Trans. Beardsworth R & Collins G year: 1998 ident: 112_CR10 doi: 10.1515/9781503616738 – volume-title: Propaganda: the formation of Men’s attitudes. Trans. Kellen K & Lerner J year: 1965 ident: 112_CR7 – volume-title: The question concerning technology, basic writings: from being and time (1927) to the task of thinking (1964)(ed.), David Farrell Krell. Revised edition year: 1993 ident: 112_CR9 – volume-title: The technological society. Trans. Wilkinson J year: 1964 ident: 112_CR8 – volume: 22 start-page: 73 issue: 1 year: 2010 ident: 112_CR5 publication-title: HEC Forum doi: 10.1007/s10730-010-9123-8 – ident: 112_CR2 doi: 10.2307/j.ctvpj7br6 – ident: 112_CR6 doi: 10.1186/s13010-021-00099-6 – ident: 112_CR1 doi: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262029124.003.0002 – ident: 112_CR3 doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-90955-4_13 – volume: 21 start-page: 275 issue: 3 year: 2009 ident: 112_CR4 publication-title: HEC Forum doi: 10.1007/s10730-009-9101-1 |
| RelatedPersons | Ellul, Jacques |
| RelatedPersons_xml | – fullname: Ellul, Jacques |
| SSID | ssj0045470 |
| Score | 2.2135243 |
| Snippet | In their recent article, Brummett and Muaygil reject Bishop et al.’s framing of the debate over standardization in clinical ethics consultation (CEC) “as one... In their recent article, Brummett and Muaygil reject Bishop et al.'s framing of the debate over standardization in clinical ethics consultation (CEC) "as one... Abstract In their recent article, Brummett and Muaygil reject Bishop et al.’s framing of the debate over standardization in clinical ethics consultation (CEC)... |
| SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest gale pubmed crossref springer |
| SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
| StartPage | 13 |
| SubjectTerms | Adaptation Bioethics Clinical ethics consultation Commentary Credentialing Education Ellul, Jacques Ethicists Ethics Ethics Consultation Ethics, Clinical Humans Medical ethics Methods Phenomenology Philosophy Philosophy of Medicine Proceduralism Propaganda Reference Standards Standardization Theory of Medicine/Bioethics United States |
| SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: ProQuest Central dbid: BENPR link: http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3NbtQwELZgixAX_n8CBRmExAGiOk5ie7mgFrUCia6q8qPeLNtxtittk7LJIu1tX4AHQIKX2ydhnDhbUkQvnLKKJ9aOPTOesWc-I_Tc8Cx1SwMokkhDsJIcftk0VMRwTSxnutnM-fKBj0bi6Gh44DfcKp9W2dnExlBnpXF75Fs0FTH0RLl4c_o1dLdGudNVf4XGZbThkMqSAdrY2R0dHHa22KFVka5URrCtCiy2O_ylEEKDYNNw0VuOGtT-v23zH4vT-cTJc6enzaK0d-N_2bmJrnt3FG-38nMLXbLFbXR13x-430HfQYxwt93gSzZxmeOuoBLbJl8eG1fJOW2P9TFQ4zU27Gr5o8Kr5c9pWYwxqMRkZtqM9dXyl-vpuEXgWLzGCs_ahF2L6xKD0J2c2Lpuetufq8V4Mr2LPu_tfnr7LvQ3OISGJVEdxnTIwX_gXDFmslibnGlLDLEGAktLtEjyjAyzlIOflymWRWmuY2oYyyOjDSXxPTQoysI-QJhALK0pjzJ4JKnNdZRqleeEU6tT8DICFHUTKY2HN3e3bExlE-YIJtvJlzD5TSIflYsAvVx_c9qCe1xIvePkY03pgLmbF-VsLL2eS02EYWLIU2A5YUqoXClB8sRENol0EgfomZMu6aA3CpfbM1bzqpLvPx7KbSbAOXZ5SgF64YnyEngwypdKwEg4tK4e5WaPEmyD6Td30ie9barkmegF6Om62X3p8u0KW84bGgg8IdgGmvutzK_5jhOY2yGBEec9begNTL-lmBw3yOXCRR-MBuhVpzdnf-vfA__wYi4eoWvUaXSTZrSJBvVsbh-jK-ZbPalmT7xF-A1g02xz priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest – databaseName: SpringerLINK Contemporary 1997-Present dbid: RSV link: http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1bb9MwFLZgILQXLuUWGMggJB4gmuMktsvbQEwgsWnaYNqbZTtOV6lLUJIi9a1_gB-ABH-uv4RjJylkXCR4alUfR7V9rjnfOUboieFZ6kwDCJJIQ9CSHL7ZNFTEcE0sZ9q_zDl-x_f3xcnJ-KArCqt7tHufkvSa2ou1YNs1aFuXuKUQ_gJT0nBxEV0CcyecOB4eHff613WoIn15zG_nDUyQ79T_qz7-ySCdB0uey5h6Q7R77f-WcB1d7RxPvNNyyg10wRYjd2dzh-8YoSt7XZp9hDYP-gsOFjfRZ-Ak3L9x6Ko2cZnjvqYSWw-Zx8YVc87azD4GarxuD7tafqnxavl1VhYTDFIxrUwLWl8tv7knnbZNOBYvsMJVi9m1uCkx8N3ZmW0a_7S9uVpMprNb6MPu6_ev3oTdJQ6hYUnUhDEdc3AhOFeMmSzWJmfaEkOsgdjSEi2SPCPjLOXg6mWKZVGa65gaxvLIaENJfBttFGVh7yJMIJzWlEcZfCSpzXWUapXnhFOrU3A0AhT15ypN1-HcXbQxkz7SEUy2ByDhADyWj8pFgJ6t53xs-3v8lfqlY5c1pevN7X8oq4nsRF1qIgwTY57CkhOmhMqVEiRPTGSTSCdxgB47ZpOu-0bh4D0TNa9r-fboUO4wAf6xgyoF6GlHlJewBqO6agnYCdewa0C5NaAE9WCGwz1Py0491ZKmIgaxpFwE6NF62M10kLvClnNPA7EnxNtAc6cVgfW64wTOdkxgx_lAOAYbMxwppqe-eblwAQijAXrei8iPv_Xnjb_3b-T30SZ1UuaRR1too6nm9gG6bD4107p66NXFd5wRaao priority: 102 providerName: Springer Nature |
| Title | The standardization of clinical ethics consultation and technique’s “long encirclement” of humanity: a response to Brummett and Muaygil |
| URI | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13010-021-00112-y https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34641906 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2583137278 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2581821448 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC8507162 https://doaj.org/article/b08c689757a646a8afaa80f4c1e41b43 |
| Volume | 16 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos000706723000001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVADU databaseName: BioMed Central customDbUrl: eissn: 1747-5341 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0045470 issn: 1747-5341 databaseCode: RBZ dateStart: 20060101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.biomedcentral.com/search/ providerName: BioMedCentral – providerCode: PRVAON databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals customDbUrl: eissn: 1747-5341 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0045470 issn: 1747-5341 databaseCode: DOA dateStart: 20060101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.doaj.org/ providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – providerCode: PRVHPJ databaseName: ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources customDbUrl: eissn: 1747-5341 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0045470 issn: 1747-5341 databaseCode: M~E dateStart: 20060101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://road.issn.org providerName: ISSN International Centre – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Health & Medical Collection customDbUrl: eissn: 1747-5341 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0045470 issn: 1747-5341 databaseCode: 7X7 dateStart: 20090101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/healthcomplete providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Healthcare Administration Database customDbUrl: eissn: 1747-5341 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0045470 issn: 1747-5341 databaseCode: M0T dateStart: 20090101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/healthmanagement providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: ProQuest Central customDbUrl: eissn: 1747-5341 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0045470 issn: 1747-5341 databaseCode: BENPR dateStart: 20090101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.proquest.com/central providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Publicly Available Content Database customDbUrl: eissn: 1747-5341 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0045470 issn: 1747-5341 databaseCode: PIMPY dateStart: 20090101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://search.proquest.com/publiccontent providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVAVX databaseName: SpringerLINK Contemporary 1997-Present customDbUrl: eissn: 1747-5341 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0045470 issn: 1747-5341 databaseCode: RSV dateStart: 20061201 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://link.springer.com/search?facet-content-type=%22Journal%22 providerName: Springer Nature |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3dbtMwFLZgIMQN4ncERmUQEhcQzXES2-VuQ5uYRKuqG9O4imzH6Sp1CWpSpN71BXgAJHi5PgnHTlKWIeCGm_z5JErO-XzsEx9_Ruil5mlsmwaoSCL2wUtyODKxL4nmihjOlPuZc_qBD4fi7Kw_urTUl80Jq-mBa8XtKiI0E30ec8kiJoXMpBQki3RgokBFjucTej1tMFX7YMtSRdopMoLtluCp7aAvhdAZAE39ZacZcmz9v_vkS43S1YTJK6OmrjE6vIvuNL1IvFe__T10zeT30a1BM07-AH0F6-P2L0Ez0xIXGW7nQWLj0tyxthMwZ_VoPAZpvKF0Xa--lXi9-j4r8gkGJE_nuk40X69-2Ced18QZy7dY4nmdZ2twVWDAysWFqSr3tMFCLifT2UP08fDg5N17v1l4wdcsCio_pH0OzT4HlTOdhkpnTBmiidEQDxqiRJSlpJ_GHLpnqWRpEGcqpJqxLNBKUxI-Qlt5kZvHCBMIgRXlQQq7KDaZCmIls4xwalQMnQMPBa0dEt2wktvFMWaJi04ES2rbJWA7l39Hk6WHXm_u-VxzcvxVet-adyNp-bTdBUBZ0qAs-RfKPPTCgiOxjBm5TcmZyEVZJkfH42SPCejT2vQiD71qhLICvkHLZoYDaMKSbHUkdzqSUKV1t7jFYNK4lDKhsQihKlEuPPR8U2zvtGlyuSkWTgbiRYiRQWa7huzmu8MIbNsnoHHeAXNHMd2SfHruCMeFDRoY9dCbFva_XuvPin_yPxT_FN2mttq6HKIdtFXNF-YZuqm_VNNy3kPX-Rl3W9FDN_YPhqNxzzkC2A7ICVwbHQ1Gn-BsfHz6EyvTZEI |
| linkProvider | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| linkToHtml | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMw1V3dbtMwFLbGQMAN_z-FAQaBuIBojpPYLhJC42fatLZCUNDuTOw4XaUuGU0L6l1fgAdAglfgofokHDtJR4bY3S64alWfWPXJ-fGxv3MOQg81TyLrGkCRROSBleTwzUReTDRXxHCm3GHOxw7v9cTubvvtCvpV58JYWGVtE52hTnJtz8jXaSQCmIly8eLgs2e7Rtnb1bqFRikWO2b2FUK24vn2a3i_jyjdfNN_teVVXQU8zUJ_4gW0zcGncR4zppNA6ZQpQzQxGoIdQ5QI04S0k4jD3iOJWeJHqQqoZiz1tdKUBDDvKXTa1tWzEMIu6deW39bGInVijmDrBfgHe9VMIWAHNaLerOH8XI-Avz3BH67wKEzzyF2tc4GbF_835l1CF6rNNt4oteMyWjHZFXS2W8EJrqJvoCS4PkypElJxnuI6XRQblw2Atc1THZWgBQzUeFn5djH_XuDF_McozwYYFH441iUefzH_aWfaK-uLzJ7hGI9LOLLBkxyDSu3vm8nEzdadxrPBcHQNfTgRZlxHq1memZsIkyAQinI_gY8wMqnyIxWnKeHUqAj2UC3k14IjdVW83fYQGUkXxAkmS2GTIGwOpkjlrIWeLJ85KEuXHEv90srjktKWHXc_5OOBrKyYVERoJto8giWHLBZxGseCpKH2TeirMGihB1aapS0sklnk0iCeFoXcfv9ObjABW3-LwmqhxxVRmsMadFwlggAnbC2yBuVagxIsn24O19IuK8tbyENRb6H7y2H7pEUTZiafOhoIq_0wBJobpY4t1x2E8G7bBDjOG9rXYExzJBvuubrswsZWjLbQ01pPD__Wvxl_6_hV3EPntvrdjuxs93Zuo_PUWhMHqFpDq5Px1NxBZ_SXybAY33W2CKNPJ62_vwHDrMi7 |
| linkToPdf | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1bb9MwFLZgoGkvXMYtMMAgJB5YNOdmu7yNS8XEVlUMpr1ZsWN3lbpkalKkvvUP8AOQ4M_1l3DsJGUZFwnx1Ko-jmr7nONz4u98RuiZYllitwYwJJ744CUZfNOJnxLFJNGMSvcy52ifDQb8-Lg3PFfF79Du7ZFkXdNgWZryaucsM7WJc7pTgue1h7ghpMKgoKE_v4yuxPbSIJuvHx61vtiyVZG2VOa3_TrbkWPt_9U3n9ucLgInL5yeuk2pf_3_h3MDXWsCUrxba9BNdEnnm_Yu5wb3sYnWD5rj9020MWwvPpjfQl9Aw3D7JqKp5sSFwW2tJdYOSo-VLfKc1Cf-GKTxijZ2ufha4uXi26TIRxisZTxVNZh9ufhun3RSk3PMX-IUT2ssr8ZVgUEfT091VbmnHczS-Wg8uY0-9d9-fP3Oby538BWNg8qPwh6D0IKxlFKVRVIZKjVRRCvIOTWRPDYZ6WUJgxAwS2kWJEZGoaLUBEqqkER30Fpe5PoewgTSbBmyIIOPONFGBolMjSEs1DKBAMRDQbvGQjXM5_YCjolwGRCnol4AAQvgMH6hmHvoxarPWc378VfpV1Z1VpKWs9v9UExHonEBQhKuKO-xBIYc05SnJk05MbEKdBzIOPLQU6t4wrJy5Bb2M0pnZSn2Dj-IXcohbrYQJg89b4RMAWNQaVNFATNhibw6klsdSXAbqtvc6rdo3FYpwoRHYK4h4x56smq2PS0UL9fFzMlATgp5OMjcrc1hNe4ohrXtEZhx1jGUzsR0W_LxiSM15zYxoaGHtltz-fm3_jzx9_9N_DFaH77pi_29wfsHaCO0BufASVtorZrO9EN0VX2uxuX0kfMiPwDu_XVy |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+standardization+of+clinical+ethics+consultation+and+technique%27s+%22long+encirclement%22+of+humanity%3A+a+response+to+Brummett+and+Muaygil&rft.jtitle=Philosophy%2C+ethics%2C+and+humanities+in+medicine+%3A+PEHM&rft.au=Parks%2C+Benjamin+N&rft.au=Mason%2C+Jordan&rft.date=2021-10-12&rft.pub=BioMed+Central+Ltd&rft.issn=1747-5341&rft.eissn=1747-5341&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=1&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs13010-021-00112-y&rft.externalDBID=ISR&rft.externalDocID=A681630423 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1747-5341&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1747-5341&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1747-5341&client=summon |