Single screening versus conventional double screening for study selection in systematic reviews: a methodological systematic review

Background Stringent requirements exist regarding the transparency of the study selection process and the reliability of results. A 2-step selection process is generally recommended; this is conducted by 2 reviewers independently of each other (conventional double-screening). However, the approach i...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	BMC medical research methodology Vol. 19; no. 1; pp. 132 - 9
Main Authors:	Waffenschmidt, Siw, Knelangen, Marco, Sieben, Wiebke, Bühn, Stefanie, Pieper, Dawid
Format:	Journal Article
Language:	English
Published:	London BioMed Central 28.06.2019 BioMed Central Ltd BMC
Subjects:	Abstracting and Indexing - methods Abstracting and Indexing - standards Abstracting and Indexing - statistics & numerical data Budgets Conferences and conventions Data collection Evaluation Health Sciences Humans Information Storage and Retrieval - methods Information Storage and Retrieval - standards Information Systems - standards Information Systems - statistics & numerical data Medical research Medicine Medicine & Public Health Methodology Methods Publications - standards Publications - statistics & numerical data PubMed - standards PubMed - statistics & numerical data quality reporting Research Article Statistical Theory and Methods Statistics for Life Sciences Study selection Systematic reviews Systematic Reviews as Topic Theory of Medicine/Bioethics Germany Methodology Systematic reviews Study selection
ISSN:	1471-2288, 1471-2288
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Be the first to leave a comment!