Reliability and utility of the Behaviour Support Plan Quality Evaluation tool (BSP-QEII) for auditing and quality development in services for adults with intellectual disability and challenging behaviour
Background Having an objective means of evaluating the quality of behaviour support plans (BSPs) could assist service providers and statutory authorities to monitor and improve the quality of support provided to people with intellectual disability (ID) who exhibit challenging behaviour. The Behavio...
Uloženo v:
| Vydáno v: | Journal of intellectual disability research Ročník 57; číslo 8; s. 716 - 727 |
|---|---|
| Hlavní autoři: | , , , |
| Médium: | Journal Article |
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Vydáno: |
Oxford, UK
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.08.2013
Wiley-Blackwell Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
| Témata: | |
| ISSN: | 0964-2633, 1365-2788, 1365-2788 |
| On-line přístup: | Získat plný text |
| Tagy: |
Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
|
| Abstract | Background Having an objective means of evaluating the quality of behaviour support plans (BSPs) could assist service providers and statutory authorities to monitor and improve the quality of support provided to people with intellectual disability (ID) who exhibit challenging behaviour. The Behaviour Support Plan Quality Evaluation Guide II (BSP‐QEII) was developed to monitor and assess BSPs prepared by teachers to support children with disability in the school system. This study investigated the application of the BSP‐QEII to the assessment of BSPs for adults with ID in community support services.
Method The inter‐rater reliability of the BSP‐QEII was assessed. The utility of the BPS‐QEII was then investigated with reference to a time series study of matched pairs of BSPs, developed for the same clients over a period of approximately 3 years. Differences in plan quality measured across a number of service and systemic variables were also investigated.
Results The BSP‐QEII was found to have good inter‐rater reliability and good utility for audit purposes. It was able to discriminate changes in plan quality over time. Differences in plan quality were also evident across different service types, where specialist staff had or had not been involved, and in some instances where a statutory format for the plan had or had not been used. There were no differences between plans developed by government and community sector agencies, nor were there any regional differences across the jurisdiction.
Conclusions The BSP‐QEII could usefully be adopted as an audit tool for measuring the quality of BSPs for adults with ID. In addition to being used for research and administrative auditing, the principles underpinning the BSP‐QEII could also be useful to guide policy and educational activities for staff in community based services for adults with ID. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Having an objective means of evaluating the quality of behaviour support plans (BSPs) could assist service providers and statutory authorities to monitor and improve the quality of support provided to people with intellectual disability (ID) who exhibit challenging behaviour. The Behaviour Support Plan Quality Evaluation Guide II (BSP-QEII) was developed to monitor and assess BSPs prepared by teachers to support children with disability in the school system. This study investigated the application of the BSP-QEII to the assessment of BSPs for adults with ID in community support services.
The inter-rater reliability of the BSP-QEII was assessed. The utility of the BPS-QEII was then investigated with reference to a time series study of matched pairs of BSPs, developed for the same clients over a period of approximately 3 years. Differences in plan quality measured across a number of service and systemic variables were also investigated.
The BSP-QEII was found to have good inter-rater reliability and good utility for audit purposes. It was able to discriminate changes in plan quality over time. Differences in plan quality were also evident across different service types, where specialist staff had or had not been involved, and in some instances where a statutory format for the plan had or had not been used. There were no differences between plans developed by government and community sector agencies, nor were there any regional differences across the jurisdiction.
The BSP-QEII could usefully be adopted as an audit tool for measuring the quality of BSPs for adults with ID. In addition to being used for research and administrative auditing, the principles underpinning the BSP-QEII could also be useful to guide policy and educational activities for staff in community based services for adults with ID. Background Having an objective means of evaluating the quality of behaviour support plans (BSPs) could assist service providers and statutory authorities to monitor and improve the quality of support provided to people with intellectual disability (ID) who exhibit challenging behaviour. The Behaviour Support Plan Quality Evaluation Guide II (BSP-QEII) was developed to monitor and assess BSPs prepared by teachers to support children with disability in the school system. This study investigated the application of the BSP-QEII to the assessment of BSPs for adults with ID in community support services. Method The inter-rater reliability of the BSP-QEII was assessed. The utility of the BPS-QEII was then investigated with reference to a time series study of matched pairs of BSPs, developed for the same clients over a period of approximately 3 years. Differences in plan quality measured across a number of service and systemic variables were also investigated. Results The BSP-QEII was found to have good inter-rater reliability and good utility for audit purposes. It was able to discriminate changes in plan quality over time. Differences in plan quality were also evident across different service types, where specialist staff had or had not been involved, and in some instances where a statutory format for the plan had or had not been used. There were no differences between plans developed by government and community sector agencies, nor were there any regional differences across the jurisdiction. Conclusions The BSP-QEII could usefully be adopted as an audit tool for measuring the quality of BSPs for adults with ID. In addition to being used for research and administrative auditing, the principles underpinning the BSP-QEII could also be useful to guide policy and educational activities for staff in community based services for adults with ID. Adapted from the source document. Having an objective means of evaluating the quality of behaviour support plans (BSPs) could assist service providers and statutory authorities to monitor and improve the quality of support provided to people with intellectual disability (ID) who exhibit challenging behaviour. The Behaviour Support Plan Quality Evaluation Guide II (BSP-QEII) was developed to monitor and assess BSPs prepared by teachers to support children with disability in the school system. This study investigated the application of the BSP-QEII to the assessment of BSPs for adults with ID in community support services.BACKGROUNDHaving an objective means of evaluating the quality of behaviour support plans (BSPs) could assist service providers and statutory authorities to monitor and improve the quality of support provided to people with intellectual disability (ID) who exhibit challenging behaviour. The Behaviour Support Plan Quality Evaluation Guide II (BSP-QEII) was developed to monitor and assess BSPs prepared by teachers to support children with disability in the school system. This study investigated the application of the BSP-QEII to the assessment of BSPs for adults with ID in community support services.The inter-rater reliability of the BSP-QEII was assessed. The utility of the BPS-QEII was then investigated with reference to a time series study of matched pairs of BSPs, developed for the same clients over a period of approximately 3 years. Differences in plan quality measured across a number of service and systemic variables were also investigated.METHODThe inter-rater reliability of the BSP-QEII was assessed. The utility of the BPS-QEII was then investigated with reference to a time series study of matched pairs of BSPs, developed for the same clients over a period of approximately 3 years. Differences in plan quality measured across a number of service and systemic variables were also investigated.The BSP-QEII was found to have good inter-rater reliability and good utility for audit purposes. It was able to discriminate changes in plan quality over time. Differences in plan quality were also evident across different service types, where specialist staff had or had not been involved, and in some instances where a statutory format for the plan had or had not been used. There were no differences between plans developed by government and community sector agencies, nor were there any regional differences across the jurisdiction.RESULTSThe BSP-QEII was found to have good inter-rater reliability and good utility for audit purposes. It was able to discriminate changes in plan quality over time. Differences in plan quality were also evident across different service types, where specialist staff had or had not been involved, and in some instances where a statutory format for the plan had or had not been used. There were no differences between plans developed by government and community sector agencies, nor were there any regional differences across the jurisdiction.The BSP-QEII could usefully be adopted as an audit tool for measuring the quality of BSPs for adults with ID. In addition to being used for research and administrative auditing, the principles underpinning the BSP-QEII could also be useful to guide policy and educational activities for staff in community based services for adults with ID.CONCLUSIONSThe BSP-QEII could usefully be adopted as an audit tool for measuring the quality of BSPs for adults with ID. In addition to being used for research and administrative auditing, the principles underpinning the BSP-QEII could also be useful to guide policy and educational activities for staff in community based services for adults with ID. Background: Having an objective means of evaluating the quality of behaviour support plans (BSPs) could assist service providers and statutory authorities to monitor and improve the quality of support provided to people with intellectual disability (ID) who exhibit challenging behaviour. The Behaviour Support Plan Quality Evaluation Guide II (BSP-QEII) was developed to monitor and assess BSPs prepared by teachers to support children with disability in the school system. This study investigated the application of the BSP-QEII to the assessment of BSPs for adults with ID in community support services. Method: The inter-rater reliability of the BSP-QEII was assessed. The utility of the BPS-QEII was then investigated with reference to a time series study of matched pairs of BSPs, developed for the same clients over a period of approximately 3 years. Differences in plan quality measured across a number of service and systemic variables were also investigated. Results: The BSP-QEII was found to have good inter-rater reliability and good utility for audit purposes. It was able to discriminate changes in plan quality over time. Differences in plan quality were also evident across different service types, where specialist staff had or had not been involved, and in some instances where a statutory format for the plan had or had not been used. There were no differences between plans developed by government and community sector agencies, nor were there any regional differences across the jurisdiction. Conclusions: The BSP-QEII could usefully be adopted as an audit tool for measuring the quality of BSPs for adults with ID. In addition to being used for research and administrative auditing, the principles underpinning the BSP-QEII could also be useful to guide policy and educational activities for staff in community based services for adults with ID. (Contains 4 tables and 1 figure.) Background Having an objective means of evaluating the quality of behaviour support plans (BSPs) could assist service providers and statutory authorities to monitor and improve the quality of support provided to people with intellectual disability (ID) who exhibit challenging behaviour. The Behaviour Support Plan Quality Evaluation Guide II (BSP-QEII) was developed to monitor and assess BSPs prepared by teachers to support children with disability in the school system. This study investigated the application of the BSP-QEII to the assessment of BSPs for adults with ID in community support services. Method The inter-rater reliability of the BSP-QEII was assessed. The utility of the BPS-QEII was then investigated with reference to a time series study of matched pairs of BSPs, developed for the same clients over a period of approximately 3 years. Differences in plan quality measured across a number of service and systemic variables were also investigated. Results The BSP-QEII was found to have good inter-rater reliability and good utility for audit purposes. It was able to discriminate changes in plan quality over time. Differences in plan quality were also evident across different service types, where specialist staff had or had not been involved, and in some instances where a statutory format for the plan had or had not been used. There were no differences between plans developed by government and community sector agencies, nor were there any regional differences across the jurisdiction. Conclusions The BSP-QEII could usefully be adopted as an audit tool for measuring the quality of BSPs for adults with ID. In addition to being used for research and administrative auditing, the principles underpinning the BSP-QEII could also be useful to guide policy and educational activities for staff in community based services for adults with ID. Having an objective means of evaluating the quality of behaviour support plans (BSPs) could assist service providers and statutory authorities to monitor and improve the quality of support provided to people with intellectual disability (ID) who exhibit challenging behaviour. The Behaviour Support Plan Quality Evaluation Guide II (BSP-QEII) was developed to monitor and assess BSPs prepared by teachers to support children with disability in the school system. This study investigated the application of the BSP-QEII to the assessment of BSPs for adults with ID in community support services. The inter-rater reliability of the BSP-QEII was assessed. The utility of the BPS-QEII was then investigated with reference to a time series study of matched pairs of BSPs, developed for the same clients over a period of approximately 3 years. Differences in plan quality measured across a number of service and systemic variables were also investigated. The BSP-QEII was found to have good inter-rater reliability and good utility for audit purposes. It was able to discriminate changes in plan quality over time. Differences in plan quality were also evident across different service types, where specialist staff had or had not been involved, and in some instances where a statutory format for the plan had or had not been used. There were no differences between plans developed by government and community sector agencies, nor were there any regional differences across the jurisdiction. The BSP-QEII could usefully be adopted as an audit tool for measuring the quality of BSPs for adults with ID. In addition to being used for research and administrative auditing, the principles underpinning the BSP-QEII could also be useful to guide policy and educational activities for staff in community based services for adults with ID. Background Having an objective means of evaluating the quality of behaviour support plans (BSPs) could assist service providers and statutory authorities to monitor and improve the quality of support provided to people with intellectual disability (ID) who exhibit challenging behaviour. The Behaviour Support Plan Quality Evaluation Guide II (BSP‐QEII) was developed to monitor and assess BSPs prepared by teachers to support children with disability in the school system. This study investigated the application of the BSP‐QEII to the assessment of BSPs for adults with ID in community support services. Method The inter‐rater reliability of the BSP‐QEII was assessed. The utility of the BPS‐QEII was then investigated with reference to a time series study of matched pairs of BSPs, developed for the same clients over a period of approximately 3 years. Differences in plan quality measured across a number of service and systemic variables were also investigated. Results The BSP‐QEII was found to have good inter‐rater reliability and good utility for audit purposes. It was able to discriminate changes in plan quality over time. Differences in plan quality were also evident across different service types, where specialist staff had or had not been involved, and in some instances where a statutory format for the plan had or had not been used. There were no differences between plans developed by government and community sector agencies, nor were there any regional differences across the jurisdiction. Conclusions The BSP‐QEII could usefully be adopted as an audit tool for measuring the quality of BSPs for adults with ID. In addition to being used for research and administrative auditing, the principles underpinning the BSP‐QEII could also be useful to guide policy and educational activities for staff in community based services for adults with ID. Background Having an objective means of evaluating the quality of behaviour support plans (BSPs) could assist service providers and statutory authorities to monitor and improve the quality of support provided to people with intellectual disability (ID) who exhibit challenging behaviour. The Behaviour Support Plan Quality Evaluation Guide II (BSP‐QEII) was developed to monitor and assess BSPs prepared by teachers to support children with disability in the school system. This study investigated the application of the BSP‐QEII to the assessment of BSPs for adults with ID in community support services. Method The inter‐rater reliability of the BSP‐QEII was assessed. The utility of the BPS‐QEII was then investigated with reference to a time series study of matched pairs of BSPs, developed for the same clients over a period of approximately 3 years. Differences in plan quality measured across a number of service and systemic variables were also investigated. Results The BSP‐QEII was found to have good inter‐rater reliability and good utility for audit purposes. It was able to discriminate changes in plan quality over time. Differences in plan quality were also evident across different service types, where specialist staff had or had not been involved, and in some instances where a statutory format for the plan had or had not been used. There were no differences between plans developed by government and community sector agencies, nor were there any regional differences across the jurisdiction. Conclusions The BSP‐QEII could usefully be adopted as an audit tool for measuring the quality of BSPs for adults with ID. In addition to being used for research and administrative auditing, the principles underpinning the BSP‐QEII could also be useful to guide policy and educational activities for staff in community based services for adults with ID. |
| Author | Paris, M. Sharp, G. McVilly, K. Webber, L. |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: K. surname: McVilly fullname: McVilly, K. email: keith.mcvilly@deakin.edu.au organization: School of Psychology, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia – sequence: 2 givenname: L. surname: Webber fullname: Webber, L. organization: Office of the Senior Practitioner, Department of Human Services, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia – sequence: 3 givenname: M. surname: Paris fullname: Paris, M. organization: School of Psychology, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia – sequence: 4 givenname: G. surname: Sharp fullname: Sharp, G. organization: School of Psychology, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia |
| BackLink | http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1014798$$DView record in ERIC http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=27469328$$DView record in Pascal Francis https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22845772$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNqNkltv0zAcxSM0xC7wEUCWENJ4SPEttvMwJDaV0TFgFy6Plus4q0uadLbTbZ-RL4XTtAXtZfOLLZ3fOf7bOrvJVt3UJkkAggMU17vpABGWpZgLMcAQ4QFEDJLB7ZNkZyNsJTswZzTFjJDtZNf7KYSQIcqeJdsYC5pxjneSPxemsmpsKxvugKoL0Ib-3JQgTAw4NBO1sE3rwGU7nzcugLNK1eC8VUtquFBVq4JtahCapgL7h5dn6flwNHoLysYB1RY22PpqmXy98hRmYapmPjN1ALYG3riF1cb3hqKtggc3NkyiFkxVGR2iDxTW_z-lnqgo1Vdd9ng94vPkaakqb16s9r3kx8fh96NP6em349HRh9NUM8JIquPLmSgUM6goOIdClGORIYbgmOYlZCbXRanwODNFrnmmGDEFNRkzPNNFFhP2kv0-d-6a69b4IGfW6zirqk3TeokEwZhiwbKHUc5zioSA9GE0g0SwyIqHUYp4RkW-RF_fQ6fxp-r4PRIRDgljlOBIvVpR7XhmCjl3dqbcnVz3JAJvVoDyWlWlU7W2_h_HKcsJ7q572XPGWb2RhycIIsrzTn_f69o13jtTSm3Dsj_BKVtJBGVXcDmVXY9l12PZFVwuCy5vY4C4F7C-5BHWg956Yytz92ifPBlddKfoT3u_9cHcbvzK_ZaME57JX1-PJT788hnCMyp_kr8ntiGf |
| CODEN | JIDREN |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1111_jar_12660 crossref_primary_10_1111_jir_13020 crossref_primary_10_3109_13668250_2016_1254736 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40617_018_0255_7 crossref_primary_10_1111_jppi_12398 crossref_primary_10_1080_20473869_2023_2238153 crossref_primary_10_1080_23297018_2024_2391804 crossref_primary_10_1111_jar_13261 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1111/j.1468-3148.1999.tb00048.x 10.1017/CBO9780511861178 10.2307/2529310 10.1353/etc.2007.0017 10.3109/13668250.2010.489038 10.1177/0022466910369941 10.1177/10983007070090010201 10.1046/j.1365-2788.2002.00440.x 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2004.00578.x 10.1007/s10864-006-9024-8 10.1177/1744629507080791 10.3109/13668250903499090 10.1177/1098300708318796 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2006.00815.x 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2008.01060.x 10.1016/S0005-7916(00)00004-5 10.1207/S15327035EX0803_6 10.1016/S0891-4222(00)00061-5 10.1353/etc.2007.0021 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | 2012 The Authors. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research © 2012 John Wiley & Sons Ltd, MENCAP & IASSID 2015 INIST-CNRS 2012 The Authors. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research © 2012 John Wiley & Sons Ltd, MENCAP & IASSID. Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Aug 2013 |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: 2012 The Authors. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research © 2012 John Wiley & Sons Ltd, MENCAP & IASSID – notice: 2015 INIST-CNRS – notice: 2012 The Authors. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research © 2012 John Wiley & Sons Ltd, MENCAP & IASSID. – notice: Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Aug 2013 |
| DBID | BSCLL AAYXX CITATION 7SW BJH BNH BNI BNJ BNO ERI PET REK WWN IQODW CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7QJ 7X8 7TK |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2012.01603.x |
| DatabaseName | Istex CrossRef ERIC ERIC (Ovid) ERIC ERIC ERIC (Legacy Platform) ERIC( SilverPlatter ) ERIC ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform) Education Resources Information Center (ERIC) ERIC Pascal-Francis Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) MEDLINE - Academic Neurosciences Abstracts |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef ERIC MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA) MEDLINE - Academic Neurosciences Abstracts |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA) MEDLINE - Academic ERIC Neurosciences Abstracts Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA) CrossRef |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: 7X8 name: MEDLINE - Academic url: https://search.proquest.com/medline sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Medicine Social Welfare & Social Work |
| EISSN | 1365-2788 |
| ERIC | EJ1014798 |
| EndPage | 727 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 3002045291 22845772 27469328 EJ1014798 10_1111_j_1365_2788_2012_01603_x JIR1603 ark_67375_WNG_2BMK00P4_V |
| Genre | article Validation Studies Journal Article Feature |
| GeographicLocations | Australia |
| GeographicLocations_xml | – name: Australia |
| GroupedDBID | --- -W8 -~X ..I .3N .GA .GJ .GO .Y3 04C 05W 0R~ 10A 1OB 1OC 29K 31~ 33P 36B 3EH 4.4 50Y 50Z 51W 51X 52M 52N 52O 52P 52R 52S 52T 52U 52V 52W 52X 53G 5GY 5HH 5LA 5VS 66C 6PF 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 85S 8UM 930 9M8 A01 A04 AABNI AAESR AAHQN AAHSB AAIPD AAMMB AAMNL AANHP AAONW AAOUF AASGY AAWTL AAXRX AAYCA AAYJJ AAZKR ABCQN ABCUV ABDBF ABEML ABIVO ABJNI ABPVW ABQWH ABSOO ABUFD ABXGK ACAHQ ACBKW ACBWZ ACCZN ACFBH ACGFO ACGFS ACGOF ACHQT ACMXC ACPOU ACRPL ACSCC ACUHS ACXQS ACYXJ ADBBV ADBTR ADEMA ADEOM ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADNMO ADOJX ADXAS ADZMN AEFGJ AEGXH AEIGN AEIMD AEUYR AEYWJ AFBPY AFEBI AFFNX AFFPM AFGKR AFKFF AFWVQ AFZJQ AGHNM AGQPQ AGXDD AHBTC AHEFC AI. AIACR AIAGR AIDQK AIDYY AIQQE AIURR ALAGY ALEEW ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN ALVPJ AMBMR AMYDB ASPBG ASTYK AVWKF AZBYB AZFZN AZVAB BAFTC BDRZF BFHJK BMSDO BMXJE BNVMJ BQESF BROTX BRXPI BSCLL BY8 C45 CAG COF CS3 D-6 D-7 D-C D-D D-I DCZOG DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DRMAN DRSSH DU5 EAD EAP EAS EBC EBD EBS ECF ECT ECV EDJ EIHBH EJD EMB EMK EMOBN ENC EPS EPT ESX EX3 F00 F01 F5P FEDTE FUBAC FZ0 G-S G.N G50 GJSGG GODZA HF~ HGLYW HVGLF HZI HZ~ H~9 IHE IX1 J0M K48 KBYEO LATKE LC2 LC3 LEEKS LH- LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LUTES LW6 LYRES MEWTI MK4 MRFUL MRMAN MRSSH MSFUL MSMAN MSSSH MXFUL MXMAN MXSSH N04 N06 N9A NF~ O66 O9- OHT OIG OVD P2P P2W P2Y P2Z P4B P4C PALCI PQQKQ Q.N Q11 QB0 Q~Q R.K RIWAO RJQFR ROL RX1 SAMSI SUPJJ SV3 TEORI TUS TWZ UB1 V8K VH1 W8V W99 WBKPD WH7 WHWMO WIH WII WIJ WOHZO WOW WQ9 WQJ WVDHM WXI WXSBR XG1 YFH YUY YYQ ZGI ZXP ZZTAW ~IA ~WP AAHHS ACCFJ AEEZP AEQDE AEUQT AFPWT AFYRF AIFKG AIWBW AJBDE WRC WUP YCJ AAYXX CITATION O8X 7SW BJH BNH BNI BNJ BNO ERI PET REK WWN AAJUZ AAVGM ABCVL ABPTK ABSRN ABWRO ACXME ADDAD AFVGU AGJLS AJYWA AKALU IQODW XFK CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7QJ 7X8 7TK |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c6363-c57768da6e1dd77088fb851610b49f06e9cdfa2b5ed9c75a63ed4e56e75cd5363 |
| IEDL.DBID | DRFUL |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 9 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000320608800003&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 0964-2633 1365-2788 |
| IngestDate | Thu Sep 04 17:55:05 EDT 2025 Thu Sep 04 15:50:48 EDT 2025 Fri Sep 05 13:34:24 EDT 2025 Sun Nov 09 13:12:38 EST 2025 Mon Nov 10 21:41:31 EST 2025 Mon Jul 21 05:53:15 EDT 2025 Sun Oct 22 16:07:56 EDT 2023 Tue Dec 02 16:44:04 EST 2025 Sat Nov 29 01:38:04 EST 2025 Tue Nov 18 22:06:20 EST 2025 Wed Jan 22 16:48:16 EST 2025 Tue Nov 11 03:29:53 EST 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 8 |
| Keywords | Human Handicap Evaluation reliability Developmental disorder Mental retardation Behavioral disorder assessment Utility Intellectual deficiency Development behaviour support plan Adult Behavior challenging behaviour Tool |
| Language | English |
| License | CC BY 4.0 2012 The Authors. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research © 2012 John Wiley & Sons Ltd, MENCAP & IASSID. |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c6363-c57768da6e1dd77088fb851610b49f06e9cdfa2b5ed9c75a63ed4e56e75cd5363 |
| Notes | ArticleID:JIR1603 ark:/67375/WNG-2BMK00P4-V istex:3008002835D6F7B1D37964C672845BB542A64006 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
| OpenAccessLink | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2012.01603.x |
| PMID | 22845772 |
| PQID | 1370366432 |
| PQPubID | 48635 |
| PageCount | 12 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1832242865 proquest_miscellaneous_1779418804 proquest_miscellaneous_1503861888 proquest_miscellaneous_1417548988 proquest_journals_1370366432 pubmed_primary_22845772 pascalfrancis_primary_27469328 eric_primary_EJ1014798 crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_j_1365_2788_2012_01603_x crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1365_2788_2012_01603_x wiley_primary_10_1111_j_1365_2788_2012_01603_x_JIR1603 istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_2BMK00P4_V |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | August 2013 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2013-08-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 08 year: 2013 text: August 2013 |
| PublicationDecade | 2010 |
| PublicationPlace | Oxford, UK |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Oxford, UK – name: Oxford – name: England |
| PublicationTitle | Journal of intellectual disability research |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | J Intellect Disabil Res |
| PublicationYear | 2013 |
| Publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd Wiley-Blackwell Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd – name: Wiley-Blackwell – name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
| References | Cook C. R., Crews D., Browning-Wright D., Mayer R., Gale B., Kraemer B. et al. (2007) Establishing and evaluating the substantive adequacy of positive behavior support plans. Journal of Behavioral Education 16, 191-206. Allen D. & Hill-Tout J. (1998) A day in the life: day activities for people with intellectual disability and challenging behaviour in two English counties. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 12, 30-45. Gwet K. (2010) Handbook of Inter-Rater Reliability, 2nd edn. Advanced Analytics, LLC, Gaithersburg, MD. Carr E. G. & Horner R. H. (2007) The expanding vision of positive behavior support. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions 9, 3-14. Webber L., McVilly K., Fester T. & Zazelis T. (2011b) Assessing behaviour support plans for Australian adults with intellectual disability using the 'Behavior Support Plan Quality Evaluation II' (BSP-QE II). Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability 36, 1-5. Webber L., McVilly K., Fester T. & Chan J. (2011a) Factors influencing quality of behaviour support plans and the impact of plan quality of on restrictive intervention use. International Journal of Positive Behavioural Support 1, 24-31. McClean B., Grey I. M. & McCracken M. (2007) An evaluation of positive behavioural support for people with very severe challenging behaviours in community-based settings. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities 11, 281-301. Anastasi A. & Urbina S. P. (1997) Psycholgical Testing, Seventh International Edition. Prentics Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. Australian Psychological Society [APS] (2011) Evidence-Based Guidelines to Reduce the Need for Restrictive Practices in the Disability Sector. APS, Melbourne. Available at: http://www.psychology.org.au/Assets/Files/Restrictive-Practices-Guidelines-for-Psychologists.pdf (retrieved 1 December 2011). Feldman M. A., Atkinson L., Foti-Gervais L. & Condillac R. (2004) Formal versus informal interventions for challenging behaviours in persons with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 48, 60-8. Bird F. L. & Luiselli J. K. (2000) Positive behavioural support of adults with developmental disabilities: assessment of long term adjustment and habilitation following restrictive treatment histories. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 31, 5-19. Kraemer B. R., Cook C. R., Browning-Wright D., Mayer G. R. & Wallace M. D. (2008) Effects of training on the use of the Behavior support plan quality evaluation guide with autism educators. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions 10, 179-89. Landis J. R. & Koch G. G. (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33, 159-74. Cook C. R., Mayer G. R., Browning-Wright D., Kraemer B., Wallace M. D., Dart E. et al. (2012) Exploring the link among behaviour intervention plans, treatment integrity and student outcomes under natural conditions. The Journal of Special Education 46, 3-16. Cooper S. A., Smiley E., Allan L. M., Jackson A., Finlayson J., Mantry D. et al. (2009) Adults with intellectual disabilities: prevalence, incidence and remission of self-injurious behaviour, and related factors. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 53, 200-16. Phillips L., Wilson L. & Wilson E. (2010) Assessing behaviour support plans for people with intellectual disability before and after the Victorian Disability Act, 2006. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability 35, 9-13. Ball T., Bush A. & Emerson E. (2004) Psychological Interventions for Severely Challenging Behaviors Shown by People with Learning Disabilities. The British Psychological Association, Leicester. Emerson E., Kiernan C., Alborz A., Reeves D., Mason H., Swarbrick R. et al. (2001) The prevalence of challenging behaviours: a total population study. Research in Developmental Disabilities 22, 77-93. Webber L., McVilly K., Stevenson E. & Chan J. (2010) Restrictive interventions for people with intellectual disability exhibiting challenging behaviours of concern: analyses of a population database. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 35, 199-206. Browning-Wright D., Mayer G. R., Cook C. R., Crews S. D., Kraemer B. R. & Gale B. (2007) A preliminary study on the effects of training using Behaviour Support Plan Quality Evaluation Guide (BSP-QE) to improve positive behavioural support plans. Education and Treatment of Children 30, 89-106. Emerson E. & Einfeld S. (2011) Challenging Behaviour, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Blood E. & Neel R. S. (2007) From FBA to implementation: a look at what is actually being delivered. Education and Treatment of Children 30, 67-80. Cook C. R., Crews S. D., Browning-Wright D. B., Mayer G. R., Gale B., Kraemer B. et al. (2006) Establishing and evaluating the substantive adequacy of positive behavioral support plans. Journal of Behavioral Education 16, 191-206. Mansell J., Ashman B., MacDonald S. & Beadle-Brown J. (2002) Residential care in the community for adults with intellectual disability: needs, characteristics and services. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 46, 625-33. Crocker A. G., Mercier C., Lachapelle Y., Brunet A., Morin D. & Roy M. E. (2006) Prevalence and types of aggressive behaviour among adults with ID. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 50, 652-61. Horner R. H., Sugai G., Todd A. W. & Lewis-Palmer T. (2000) Elements of behavior support plans: a technical brief. Exceptionality: A Special Education Journal 8, 205-15. McVilly K., Webber L., Sharp G. & Paris M. (2012) The content validity of the Behaviour Support Plan Quality Evaluation tool (BSP-QEII) and its potential application in accommodation and day-support services for adults with intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research (in press). 2006; 50 2010; 35 2012 2011 2010 2011a; 1 2006; 16 2004; 48 2000; 8 1997 2008; 10 2004 2003 2007; 30 2001; 22 2007; 11 1999 2007; 16 2009; 53 2011b; 36 2002; 46 2000; 31 2007; 9 1977; 33 2012; 46 1998; 12 e_1_2_5_27_1 e_1_2_5_28_1 e_1_2_5_25_1 e_1_2_5_23_1 e_1_2_5_24_1 e_1_2_5_21_1 e_1_2_5_22_1 Anastasi A. (e_1_2_5_3_1) 1997 Webber L. (e_1_2_5_29_1) 2011; 1 e_1_2_5_15_1 e_1_2_5_14_1 e_1_2_5_17_1 e_1_2_5_9_1 e_1_2_5_16_1 e_1_2_5_8_1 e_1_2_5_11_1 e_1_2_5_7_1 e_1_2_5_10_1 e_1_2_5_6_1 e_1_2_5_13_1 e_1_2_5_12_1 McVilly K. (e_1_2_5_26_1) 2012 e_1_2_5_2_1 Australian Psychological Society [APS] (e_1_2_5_4_1) 2011 e_1_2_5_19_1 e_1_2_5_18_1 Gwet K. (e_1_2_5_20_1) 2010 Ball T. (e_1_2_5_5_1) 2004 Webber L. (e_1_2_5_30_1) 2011; 36 |
| References_xml | – reference: Cooper S. A., Smiley E., Allan L. M., Jackson A., Finlayson J., Mantry D. et al. (2009) Adults with intellectual disabilities: prevalence, incidence and remission of self-injurious behaviour, and related factors. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 53, 200-16. – reference: Webber L., McVilly K., Stevenson E. & Chan J. (2010) Restrictive interventions for people with intellectual disability exhibiting challenging behaviours of concern: analyses of a population database. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 35, 199-206. – reference: Ball T., Bush A. & Emerson E. (2004) Psychological Interventions for Severely Challenging Behaviors Shown by People with Learning Disabilities. The British Psychological Association, Leicester. – reference: Australian Psychological Society [APS] (2011) Evidence-Based Guidelines to Reduce the Need for Restrictive Practices in the Disability Sector. APS, Melbourne. Available at: http://www.psychology.org.au/Assets/Files/Restrictive-Practices-Guidelines-for-Psychologists.pdf (retrieved 1 December 2011). – reference: Carr E. G. & Horner R. H. (2007) The expanding vision of positive behavior support. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions 9, 3-14. – reference: Crocker A. G., Mercier C., Lachapelle Y., Brunet A., Morin D. & Roy M. E. (2006) Prevalence and types of aggressive behaviour among adults with ID. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 50, 652-61. – reference: Cook C. R., Crews S. D., Browning-Wright D. B., Mayer G. R., Gale B., Kraemer B. et al. (2006) Establishing and evaluating the substantive adequacy of positive behavioral support plans. Journal of Behavioral Education 16, 191-206. – reference: McVilly K., Webber L., Sharp G. & Paris M. (2012) The content validity of the Behaviour Support Plan Quality Evaluation tool (BSP-QEII) and its potential application in accommodation and day-support services for adults with intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research (in press). – reference: Cook C. R., Mayer G. R., Browning-Wright D., Kraemer B., Wallace M. D., Dart E. et al. (2012) Exploring the link among behaviour intervention plans, treatment integrity and student outcomes under natural conditions. The Journal of Special Education 46, 3-16. – reference: Kraemer B. R., Cook C. R., Browning-Wright D., Mayer G. R. & Wallace M. D. (2008) Effects of training on the use of the Behavior support plan quality evaluation guide with autism educators. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions 10, 179-89. – reference: Allen D. & Hill-Tout J. (1998) A day in the life: day activities for people with intellectual disability and challenging behaviour in two English counties. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 12, 30-45. – reference: Browning-Wright D., Mayer G. R., Cook C. R., Crews S. D., Kraemer B. R. & Gale B. (2007) A preliminary study on the effects of training using Behaviour Support Plan Quality Evaluation Guide (BSP-QE) to improve positive behavioural support plans. Education and Treatment of Children 30, 89-106. – reference: Gwet K. (2010) Handbook of Inter-Rater Reliability, 2nd edn. Advanced Analytics, LLC, Gaithersburg, MD. – reference: Cook C. R., Crews D., Browning-Wright D., Mayer R., Gale B., Kraemer B. et al. (2007) Establishing and evaluating the substantive adequacy of positive behavior support plans. Journal of Behavioral Education 16, 191-206. – reference: Feldman M. A., Atkinson L., Foti-Gervais L. & Condillac R. (2004) Formal versus informal interventions for challenging behaviours in persons with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 48, 60-8. – reference: Mansell J., Ashman B., MacDonald S. & Beadle-Brown J. (2002) Residential care in the community for adults with intellectual disability: needs, characteristics and services. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 46, 625-33. – reference: Emerson E., Kiernan C., Alborz A., Reeves D., Mason H., Swarbrick R. et al. (2001) The prevalence of challenging behaviours: a total population study. Research in Developmental Disabilities 22, 77-93. – reference: Phillips L., Wilson L. & Wilson E. (2010) Assessing behaviour support plans for people with intellectual disability before and after the Victorian Disability Act, 2006. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability 35, 9-13. – reference: Webber L., McVilly K., Fester T. & Zazelis T. (2011b) Assessing behaviour support plans for Australian adults with intellectual disability using the 'Behavior Support Plan Quality Evaluation II' (BSP-QE II). Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability 36, 1-5. – reference: Emerson E. & Einfeld S. (2011) Challenging Behaviour, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. – reference: Horner R. H., Sugai G., Todd A. W. & Lewis-Palmer T. (2000) Elements of behavior support plans: a technical brief. Exceptionality: A Special Education Journal 8, 205-15. – reference: Landis J. R. & Koch G. G. (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33, 159-74. – reference: Anastasi A. & Urbina S. P. (1997) Psycholgical Testing, Seventh International Edition. Prentics Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. – reference: Bird F. L. & Luiselli J. K. (2000) Positive behavioural support of adults with developmental disabilities: assessment of long term adjustment and habilitation following restrictive treatment histories. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 31, 5-19. – reference: Blood E. & Neel R. S. (2007) From FBA to implementation: a look at what is actually being delivered. Education and Treatment of Children 30, 67-80. – reference: Webber L., McVilly K., Fester T. & Chan J. (2011a) Factors influencing quality of behaviour support plans and the impact of plan quality of on restrictive intervention use. International Journal of Positive Behavioural Support 1, 24-31. – reference: McClean B., Grey I. M. & McCracken M. (2007) An evaluation of positive behavioural support for people with very severe challenging behaviours in community-based settings. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities 11, 281-301. – year: 2011 – volume: 8 start-page: 205 year: 2000 end-page: 15 article-title: Elements of behavior support plans: a technical brief publication-title: Exceptionality: A Special Education Journal – volume: 35 start-page: 9 year: 2010 end-page: 13 article-title: Assessing behaviour support plans for people with intellectual disability before and after the Victorian Disability Act, 2006 publication-title: Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability – volume: 16 start-page: 191 year: 2007 end-page: 206 article-title: Establishing and evaluating the substantive adequacy of positive behavior support plans publication-title: Journal of Behavioral Education – volume: 10 start-page: 179 year: 2008 end-page: 89 article-title: Effects of training on the use of the Behavior support plan quality evaluation guide with autism educators publication-title: Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions – volume: 33 start-page: 159 year: 1977 end-page: 74 article-title: The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data publication-title: Biometrics – volume: 22 start-page: 77 year: 2001 end-page: 93 article-title: The prevalence of challenging behaviours: a total population study publication-title: Research in Developmental Disabilities – year: 2003 – volume: 9 start-page: 3 year: 2007 end-page: 14 article-title: The expanding vision of positive behavior support publication-title: Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions – volume: 53 start-page: 200 year: 2009 end-page: 16 article-title: Adults with intellectual disabilities: prevalence, incidence and remission of self‐injurious behaviour, and related factors publication-title: Journal of Intellectual Disability Research – volume: 46 start-page: 625 year: 2002 end-page: 33 article-title: Residential care in the community for adults with intellectual disability: needs, characteristics and services publication-title: Journal of Intellectual Disability Research – volume: 16 start-page: 191 year: 2006 end-page: 206 article-title: Establishing and evaluating the substantive adequacy of positive behavioral support plans publication-title: Journal of Behavioral Education – volume: 50 start-page: 652 year: 2006 end-page: 61 article-title: Prevalence and types of aggressive behaviour among adults with ID publication-title: Journal of Intellectual Disability Research – year: 2010 – volume: 31 start-page: 5 year: 2000 end-page: 19 article-title: Positive behavioural support of adults with developmental disabilities: assessment of long term adjustment and habilitation following restrictive treatment histories publication-title: Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry – volume: 30 start-page: 67 year: 2007 end-page: 80 article-title: From FBA to implementation: a look at what is actually being delivered publication-title: Education and Treatment of Children – volume: 48 start-page: 60 year: 2004 end-page: 8 article-title: Formal versus informal interventions for challenging behaviours in persons with intellectual disabilities publication-title: Journal of Intellectual Disability Research – year: 2012 article-title: The content validity of the Behaviour Support Plan Quality Evaluation tool (BSP‐QEII) and its potential application in accommodation and day‐support services for adults with intellectual disability publication-title: Journal of Intellectual Disability Research – volume: 36 start-page: 1 year: 2011b end-page: 5 article-title: Assessing behaviour support plans for Australian adults with intellectual disability using the ‘Behavior Support Plan Quality Evaluation II’ (BSP‐QE II) publication-title: Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability – volume: 30 start-page: 89 year: 2007 end-page: 106 article-title: A preliminary study on the effects of training using Behaviour Support Plan Quality Evaluation Guide (BSP‐QE) to improve positive behavioural support plans publication-title: Education and Treatment of Children – volume: 1 start-page: 24 year: 2011a end-page: 31 article-title: Factors influencing quality of behaviour support plans and the impact of plan quality of on restrictive intervention use publication-title: International Journal of Positive Behavioural Support – year: 2004 – year: 1997 – volume: 12 start-page: 30 year: 1998 end-page: 45 article-title: A day in the life: day activities for people with intellectual disability and challenging behaviour in two English counties publication-title: Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities – volume: 35 start-page: 199 year: 2010 end-page: 206 article-title: Restrictive interventions for people with intellectual disability exhibiting challenging behaviours of concern: analyses of a population database publication-title: Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities – volume: 11 start-page: 281 year: 2007 end-page: 301 article-title: An evaluation of positive behavioural support for people with very severe challenging behaviours in community‐based settings publication-title: Journal of Intellectual Disabilities – year: 1999 – volume: 46 start-page: 3 year: 2012 end-page: 16 article-title: Exploring the link among behaviour intervention plans, treatment integrity and student outcomes under natural conditions publication-title: The Journal of Special Education – ident: e_1_2_5_2_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3148.1999.tb00048.x – ident: e_1_2_5_17_1 doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511861178 – ident: e_1_2_5_23_1 doi: 10.2307/2529310 – ident: e_1_2_5_9_1 doi: 10.1353/etc.2007.0017 – year: 2012 ident: e_1_2_5_26_1 article-title: The content validity of the Behaviour Support Plan Quality Evaluation tool (BSP‐QEII) and its potential application in accommodation and day‐support services for adults with intellectual disability publication-title: Journal of Intellectual Disability Research – ident: e_1_2_5_28_1 doi: 10.3109/13668250.2010.489038 – ident: e_1_2_5_14_1 doi: 10.1177/0022466910369941 – ident: e_1_2_5_10_1 doi: 10.1177/10983007070090010201 – ident: e_1_2_5_24_1 doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2788.2002.00440.x – ident: e_1_2_5_11_1 – ident: e_1_2_5_19_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2004.00578.x – ident: e_1_2_5_12_1 doi: 10.1007/s10864-006-9024-8 – ident: e_1_2_5_25_1 doi: 10.1177/1744629507080791 – ident: e_1_2_5_27_1 doi: 10.3109/13668250903499090 – ident: e_1_2_5_22_1 doi: 10.1177/1098300708318796 – volume-title: Handbook of Inter‐Rater Reliability year: 2010 ident: e_1_2_5_20_1 – ident: e_1_2_5_13_1 doi: 10.1007/s10864-006-9024-8 – volume-title: Psychological Interventions for Severely Challenging Behaviors Shown by People with Learning Disabilities year: 2004 ident: e_1_2_5_5_1 – ident: e_1_2_5_16_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2006.00815.x – ident: e_1_2_5_8_1 – ident: e_1_2_5_15_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2008.01060.x – volume-title: Evidence‐Based Guidelines to Reduce the Need for Restrictive Practices in the Disability Sector year: 2011 ident: e_1_2_5_4_1 – ident: e_1_2_5_6_1 doi: 10.1016/S0005-7916(00)00004-5 – volume: 36 start-page: 1 year: 2011 ident: e_1_2_5_30_1 article-title: Assessing behaviour support plans for Australian adults with intellectual disability using the ‘Behavior Support Plan Quality Evaluation II’ (BSP‐QE II) publication-title: Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability – ident: e_1_2_5_21_1 doi: 10.1207/S15327035EX0803_6 – volume-title: Psycholgical Testing, Seventh International Edition year: 1997 ident: e_1_2_5_3_1 – ident: e_1_2_5_18_1 doi: 10.1016/S0891-4222(00)00061-5 – ident: e_1_2_5_7_1 doi: 10.1353/etc.2007.0021 – volume: 1 start-page: 24 year: 2011 ident: e_1_2_5_29_1 article-title: Factors influencing quality of behaviour support plans and the impact of plan quality of on restrictive intervention use publication-title: International Journal of Positive Behavioural Support |
| SSID | ssj0006146 |
| Score | 2.0766175 |
| Snippet | Background Having an objective means of evaluating the quality of behaviour support plans (BSPs) could assist service providers and statutory authorities to... Background Having an objective means of evaluating the quality of behaviour support plans (BSPs) could assist service providers and statutory authorities to... Background: Having an objective means of evaluating the quality of behaviour support plans (BSPs) could assist service providers and statutory authorities to... Having an objective means of evaluating the quality of behaviour support plans (BSPs) could assist service providers and statutory authorities to monitor and... Background Having an objective means of evaluating the quality of behaviour support plans (BSPs) could assist service providers and statutory authorities to... |
| SourceID | proquest pubmed pascalfrancis eric crossref wiley istex |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
| StartPage | 716 |
| SubjectTerms | Adult Adult and adolescent clinical studies Adult development Adults assessment Auditing Audits Audits (Verification) Australia Behavior Behavior Modification Behavior Observation Techniques Behavior Problems Behavior Therapy - standards behaviour support plan Biological and medical sciences Causality Challenging behaviour Children with disabilities Community Community Relations Community-based programs Day Care, Medical - standards Day Programs Delphi Technique Developmental disabilities Education policy Educational activities Environmental Influences Female Foreign Countries Goal Orientation Government agencies Humans Intellectual deficiency Intellectual disabilities Intellectual Disability Intellectual Disability - diagnosis Intellectual Disability - psychology Intellectual Disability - therapy Intellectually disabled people Interpersonal Communication Interrater Reliability Intervention Jurisdiction Learning disabled people Male Management Audit - statistics & numerical data Medical sciences Mental Retardation Middle Aged Observer Variation People with disabilities Planning Predictor Variables Problem Behavior - psychology Program Effectiveness Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychometrics - statistics & numerical data Psychopathology. Psychiatry Quality Assurance, Health Care - statistics & numerical data Quality Control Quality Improvement - standards Questionnaires Reference Materials Regional differences Regional variations Reinforcement Reliability Reproducibility of Results Responses Services Social Support Support services Teachers Teaching Methods Teamwork Test Reliability Test Validity Time Time series |
| Title | Reliability and utility of the Behaviour Support Plan Quality Evaluation tool (BSP-QEII) for auditing and quality development in services for adults with intellectual disability and challenging behaviour |
| URI | https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-2BMK00P4-V/fulltext.pdf https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2788.2012.01603.x http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1014798 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22845772 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1370366432 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1417548988 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1503861888 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1779418804 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1832242865 |
| Volume | 57 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos000320608800003&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVWIB databaseName: Wiley Online Library Full Collection 2020 customDbUrl: eissn: 1365-2788 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0006146 issn: 0964-2633 databaseCode: DRFUL dateStart: 19970101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com providerName: Wiley-Blackwell |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3NbtNAEF5BghAXfgothhAtEqrg4Cqx98c-UkggpY1CoW1u1tq7lqJGNtgJam88Ai_GS_AkzNgbt5GqqkLcLHtntfbOzH7rnfmGkFcijMFoVOxqlSqXxanvqkD03J6UsBomgVFV3trxvhyPg-k0nNj4J8yFqfkhmh9uaBmVv0YDV3G5buR1PlVQRWh5O1XF5B3Ak20P1Ji3SPv94fBov_HLos41AszOXE_4_npcz5V9rS1WNh66jZ__DGMoVQmfMa3rX1wFUNfxbrVgDR_8z1d9SO5b2Erf1nr2iNwy2Qa5e2AP5jdIp07zpSdmnqrC0G26upEXp4_Jb4x8rhnBz6nKNAV1r67zlAICpZalcVlQrDIKOwKKxZRoTfBxTgcNJTld5Pmcvt79Mvnz89fnwWj0hgLqpgpzS2ARrvr-bqX0RTwUnWW0tF6xFkDakZLiX2g6u5RJQ7XlHLbjTGytGew7Xg3yCTkaDr6---jaQhJuIvCcOuESdlVaCdPXWkpwrGkMSBOQY8zCtCdMmOhUeTE3OkwkV8I3mhkujOSJ5tDDJmlleWaeEuqnXiz6xue-UkxzHgM87sMW2Ut5gke8DpErjYkSy7KOxT7m0aXdFkxmhJMZ4WRG1WRGZw7pN5LfaqaRG8hsolI27Qd7WHpZhoFDtis1bZ6o4hRD-CSPTsYfIm_34FOvN2HRsUO6a3rcCHiSCcD20FNnpdiRdW8ljAZ52wDMeg552TwGx4SnTSoz-RLaMECmLAiD4Jo2SEYk-sG1bcBrMGQNZNe0wXWJYZK1Q7Zq47t4EQBgMP8wUlHZ2I0_brQ3OsSrZ_8q-Jzc86riKRgu2iGtRbE0L8id5MdiVhZdcltOg651Un8B0T6PQg |
| linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
| linkToHtml | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3dbtMwFLbQioAbfgYbgTKMhCa4yNQmjp1cMmhZt7YqY393lhM7UrUqgbRF2x2PwIvxEjwJ5yRutkpTNSHuosTHcuzj48_2Od8h5C2PYpg0Kna1SpXL4tR3VchbbksIWA2T0Kgybu2kL4bD8OwsGtl0QBgLU_FD1AduODNKe40THA-kl2d5FVAVli5a3k6ZMnkHAGWDgVaBujc-HXaP-7Vh5lWwEYB25nrc95cde26sa2m1sg7RDez_C3SiVFPox7RKgHETQl0GvOWK1X30X__1MXlogSv9UGnaE3LHZOvk3sBeza-TZhXoS0_NJFWFodt08SIvzp-S3-j7XHGCX1KVaQoKXz7nKQUMSi1P47ygmGcU9gQU0ynRiuLjknZqUnI6y_MJfbf7dfTn568vnV7vPQXcTRVGl8AyXNb93UrpK48oOs7o1NrFSgCJR6YUz6Hp-FosDdWWddi2M7HZZrDueNHIZ-S42zn6uOfaVBJuwvGmOgkE7Ku04qattRBgWtMYsCZgx5hFaYubKNGp8uLA6CgRgeK-0cwE3Igg0QHUsEHWsjwzzwn1Uy_mbeMHvlJMB0EMALkNm2QvDRK85HWIWKiMTCzPOqb7mMhr-y0YTImDKXEwZTmY8sIh7VryW8U1cguZDdTKunxnH5Mviyh0yHapp_UXVZyjE58I5Onws_R2Bwet1ojJE4dsLSlyLeAJxgHdQ03NhWZLa-Cm0BpkbgM46znkTf0ZTBPeN6nM5HMowwCbsjAKwxVlkI6It8OVZcBuMOQNZCvK4MrEMMzaIZvV7Lv6EYBgMP7QUl5Oslt3rtzvHeLTi38VfE3u7x0N-rLfGx68JA-8MpUKOo82ydqsmJtX5G7yYzaeFlvWVv0FO5OSSg |
| linkToPdf | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1fb9MwELdQiyZe-DPYCJRhJDTBQ6Y2cezkkbEWunVVGezPm-XEjlStSkbaou2Nj8AX40vwSbhL3GyVpmpCvEWJz3Liu_PP8d3vCHnLoxiMRsWuVqlyWZz6rgp5220LAathEhpV5q2dDMRwGJ6dRSNbDghzYSp-iPqHG1pG6a_RwM2FTpetvEqoCssQLW-nLJm8A4CyybCmTIM09456x4PaMfMq2QhAO3M97vvLgT239rW0WtmA6CZ-_0sMolRT-I5pVQDjNoS6DHjLFav36L--62Py0AJX-qHStCfknsnWydqhPZpfJ60q0ZeemkmqCkO36eJGXpw_Jb8x9rniBL-iKtMUFL68zlMKGJRansZ5QbHOKOwJKJZTohXFxxXt1qTkdJbnE_pu9-voz89fX7r9_nsKuJsqzC6BZbjs-7uV0tcRUXSc0an1i5UAEo9MKf6HpuMbuTRUW9ZhO87EVpvBvuPFIJ-R417328fPri0l4SYcT6qTQMC-SituOloLAa41jQFrAnaMWZS2uYkSnSovDoyOEhEo7hvNTMCNCBIdQA8bpJHlmXlOqJ96Me8YP_CVYjoIYgDIHdgke2mQ4CGvQ8RCZWRiedax3MdE3thvwWRKnEyJkynLyZSXDunUkhcV18gdZDZQK-v23X0sviyi0CHbpZ7WT1RxjkF8IpCnw0_S2z08aLdHTJ44ZGtJkWsBTzAO6B56ai00W1oHN4XRIHMbwFnPIW_qx-Ca8LxJZSafQxsG2JSFURiuaIN0RLwTrmwDfoMhbyBb0QZXJoZp1g7ZrKzv-kUAgsH8w0h5aWR3_rhyv3-EVy_-VfA1WRvt9eSgPzx4SR54ZSUVjB1tkcasmJtX5H7yYzaeFlvWVf0F7pqRxQ |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reliability+and+utility+of+the+Behaviour+Support+Plan+Quality+Evaluation+tool+%28BSP-QEII%29+for+auditing+and+quality+development+in+services+for+adults+with+intellectual+disability+and+challenging+behaviour&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+intellectual+disability+research&rft.au=McVilly%2C+K.&rft.au=Webber%2C+L.&rft.au=Paris%2C+M.&rft.au=Sharp%2C+G.&rft.date=2013-08-01&rft.pub=Blackwell+Publishing+Ltd&rft.issn=0964-2633&rft.eissn=1365-2788&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=716&rft.epage=727&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2788.2012.01603.x&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=ark_67375_WNG_2BMK00P4_V |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0964-2633&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0964-2633&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0964-2633&client=summon |