COVID-19: Large-scale collective action, government intervention, and the importance of trust
•Country variations in COVID-19 policy interventions are understood by applying collective action theory.•Through comparison with other large-scale collective action problems, insights on COVID-19 policies are gained.•Reciprocal trust is a relevant factor when analyzing policy responses to the pande...
Uloženo v:
| Vydáno v: | World development Ročník 138; číslo February 2021; s. 105236 |
|---|---|
| Hlavní autoři: | , , |
| Médium: | Journal Article |
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Vydáno: |
England
Elsevier Ltd
01.02.2021
Elsevier Science Publishers Pergamon Press Inc |
| Témata: | |
| ISSN: | 0305-750X, 1873-5991, 1873-5991, 0305-750X |
| On-line přístup: | Získat plný text |
| Tagy: |
Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
|
| Abstract | •Country variations in COVID-19 policy interventions are understood by applying collective action theory.•Through comparison with other large-scale collective action problems, insights on COVID-19 policies are gained.•Reciprocal trust is a relevant factor when analyzing policy responses to the pandemic worldwide.
In this article we apply a large-scale collective action framework on the spread of the COVID-19 virus. We compare the pandemic with other large-scale collective action problems – such as climate change, antimicrobial resistance and biodiversity loss – which are identified by the number of actors involved (the more actors, the larger the scale); the problem’s complexity; and the spatial and temporal distance between the actors causing and being affected by the problem. The greater the extent of these characteristics, the larger the scale of the collective action problem and the smaller the probability of spontaneous collective action. We argue that by unpacking the social dilemma logic underlying the spread of the COVID-19 virus, we can better understand the great variation in policy responses worldwide, e.g., why some countries are adopting harsher policies and enforcing them, while others tend to rely more on recommendations. We claim that one key factor is trust and, more precisely, reciprocal trust, both horizontally among people and also vertically between people and their governments – and vice versa. Citizens must trust that the recommendations they receive from the public authorities are correct, that these are in their (or the collective’s) best interest, and that most others will follow the recommendations. Simultaneously, government authorities must trust that their citizens will transform the recommendations into collective action. When this situation is present, we argue that governments enjoy a large degree of collective action capital, which potentially open up for a wider palette of policy options. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | In this article we apply a large-scale collective action framework on the spread of the COVID-19 virus. We compare the pandemic with other large-scale collective action problems - such as climate change, antimicrobial resistance and biodiversity loss - which are identified by the number of actors involved (the more actors, the larger the scale); the problem's complexity; and the spatial and temporal distance between the actors causing and being affected by the problem. The greater the extent of these characteristics, the larger the scale of the collective action problem and the smaller the probability of spontaneous collective action. We argue that by unpacking the social dilemma logic underlying the spread of the COVID-19 virus, we can better understand the great variation in policy responses worldwide, e.g., why some countries are adopting harsher policies and enforcing them, while others tend to rely more on recommendations. We claim that one key factor is trust and, more precisely, reciprocal trust, both horizontally among people and also vertically between people and their governments - and vice versa. Citizens must trust that the recommendations they receive from the public authorities are correct, that these are in their (or the collective's) best interest, and that most others will follow the recommendations. Simultaneously, government authorities must trust that their citizens will transform the recommendations into collective action. When this situation is present, we argue that governments enjoy a large degree of collective action capital, which potentially open up for a wider palette of policy options. • Country variations in COVID-19 policy interventions are understood by applying collective action theory. • Through comparison with other large-scale collective action problems, insights on COVID-19 policies are gained. • Reciprocal trust is a relevant factor when analyzing policy responses to the pandemic worldwide. In this article we apply a large-scale collective action framework on the spread of the COVID-19 virus. We compare the pandemic with other large-scale collective action problems – such as climate change, antimicrobial resistance and biodiversity loss – which are identified by the number of actors involved (the more actors, the larger the scale); the problem’s complexity; and the spatial and temporal distance between the actors causing and being affected by the problem. The greater the extent of these characteristics, the larger the scale of the collective action problem and the smaller the probability of spontaneous collective action. We argue that by unpacking the social dilemma logic underlying the spread of the COVID-19 virus, we can better understand the great variation in policy responses worldwide, e.g., why some countries are adopting harsher policies and enforcing them, while others tend to rely more on recommendations. We claim that one key factor is trust and, more precisely, reciprocal trust, both horizontally among people and also vertically between people and their governments – and vice versa. Citizens must trust that the recommendations they receive from the public authorities are correct, that these are in their (or the collective’s) best interest, and that most others will follow the recommendations. Simultaneously, government authorities must trust that their citizens will transform the recommendations into collective action. When this situation is present, we argue that governments enjoy a large degree of collective action capital, which potentially open up for a wider palette of policy options. In this article we apply a large-scale collective action framework on the spread of the COVID-19 virus. We compare the pandemic with other large-scale collective action problems - such as climate change, antimicrobial resistance and biodiversity loss - which are identified by the number of actors involved (the more actors, the larger the scale); the problem's complexity; and the spatial and temporal distance between the actors causing and being affected by the problem. The greater the extent of these characteristics, the larger the scale of the collective action problem and the smaller the probability of spontaneous collective action. We argue that by unpacking the social dilemma logic underlying the spread of the COVID-19 virus, we can better understand the great variation in policy responses worldwide, e.g., why some countries are adopting harsher policies and enforcing them, while others tend to rely more on recommendations. We claim that one key factor is trust and, more precisely, reciprocal trust, both horizontally among people and also vertically between people and their governments - and vice versa. Citizens must trust that the recommendations they receive from the public authorities are correct, that these are in their (or the collective's) best interest, and that most others will follow the recommendations. Simultaneously, government authorities must trust that their citizens will transform the recommendations into collective action. When this situation is present, we argue that governments enjoy a large degree of collective action capital, which potentially open up for a wider palette of policy options.In this article we apply a large-scale collective action framework on the spread of the COVID-19 virus. We compare the pandemic with other large-scale collective action problems - such as climate change, antimicrobial resistance and biodiversity loss - which are identified by the number of actors involved (the more actors, the larger the scale); the problem's complexity; and the spatial and temporal distance between the actors causing and being affected by the problem. The greater the extent of these characteristics, the larger the scale of the collective action problem and the smaller the probability of spontaneous collective action. We argue that by unpacking the social dilemma logic underlying the spread of the COVID-19 virus, we can better understand the great variation in policy responses worldwide, e.g., why some countries are adopting harsher policies and enforcing them, while others tend to rely more on recommendations. We claim that one key factor is trust and, more precisely, reciprocal trust, both horizontally among people and also vertically between people and their governments - and vice versa. Citizens must trust that the recommendations they receive from the public authorities are correct, that these are in their (or the collective's) best interest, and that most others will follow the recommendations. Simultaneously, government authorities must trust that their citizens will transform the recommendations into collective action. When this situation is present, we argue that governments enjoy a large degree of collective action capital, which potentially open up for a wider palette of policy options. * Reciprocal trust is a relevant factor when analyzing policy responses to the pandemic worldwide. In this article we apply a large-scale collective action framework on the spread of the COVID-19 virus. We compare the pandemic with other large-scale collective action problems -- such as climate change, antimicrobial resistance and biodiversity loss -- which are identified by the number of actors involved (the more actors, the larger the scale); the problem's complexity; and the spatial and temporal distance between the actors causing and being affected by the problem. The greater the extent of these characteristics, the larger the scale of the collective action problem and the smaller the probability of spontaneous collective action. We argue that by unpacking the social dilemma logic underlying the spread of the COVID-19 virus, we can better understand the great variation in policy responses worldwide, e.g., why some countries are adopting harsher policies and enforcing them, while others tend to rely more on recommendations. We claim that one key factor is trust and, more precisely, reciprocal trust, both horizontally among people and also vertically between people and their governments -- and vice versa. Citizens must trust that the recommendations they receive from the public authorities are correct, that these are in their (or the collective's) best interest, and that most others will follow the recommendations. Simultaneously, government authorities must trust that their citizens will transform the recommendations into collective action. When this situation is present, we argue that governments enjoy a large degree of collective action capital, which potentially open up for a wider palette of policy options. •Country variations in COVID-19 policy interventions are understood by applying collective action theory.•Through comparison with other large-scale collective action problems, insights on COVID-19 policies are gained.•Reciprocal trust is a relevant factor when analyzing policy responses to the pandemic worldwide. In this article we apply a large-scale collective action framework on the spread of the COVID-19 virus. We compare the pandemic with other large-scale collective action problems – such as climate change, antimicrobial resistance and biodiversity loss – which are identified by the number of actors involved (the more actors, the larger the scale); the problem’s complexity; and the spatial and temporal distance between the actors causing and being affected by the problem. The greater the extent of these characteristics, the larger the scale of the collective action problem and the smaller the probability of spontaneous collective action. We argue that by unpacking the social dilemma logic underlying the spread of the COVID-19 virus, we can better understand the great variation in policy responses worldwide, e.g., why some countries are adopting harsher policies and enforcing them, while others tend to rely more on recommendations. We claim that one key factor is trust and, more precisely, reciprocal trust, both horizontally among people and also vertically between people and their governments – and vice versa. Citizens must trust that the recommendations they receive from the public authorities are correct, that these are in their (or the collective’s) best interest, and that most others will follow the recommendations. Simultaneously, government authorities must trust that their citizens will transform the recommendations into collective action. When this situation is present, we argue that governments enjoy a large degree of collective action capital, which potentially open up for a wider palette of policy options. |
| ArticleNumber | 105236 |
| Audience | Trade Academic |
| Author | Harring, Niklas Löfgren, Åsa Jagers, Sverker C. |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Niklas surname: Harring fullname: Harring, Niklas email: niklas.harring@pol.gu.se organization: Centre for Collective Action Research, Department of Political Science, University of Gothenburg, Sweden – sequence: 2 givenname: Sverker C. surname: Jagers fullname: Jagers, Sverker C. email: sverker.jagers@pol.gu.se organization: Centre for Collective Action Research, Department of Political Science, University of Gothenburg, Sweden – sequence: 3 givenname: Åsa surname: Löfgren fullname: Löfgren, Åsa email: asa.lofgren@economics.gu.se organization: Centre for Collective Action Research, Department of Economics, University of Gothenburg, Sweden |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33100480$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed https://gup.ub.gu.se/publication/300295$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index (Göteborgs universitet) |
| BookMark | eNqFkk1v1DAQhiNURLeFv1BFQkIcyOLYsROjClEtX5VW6gUQFzRynEnqVdZe7GQL_x6HdBHtpSdbnucdz8d7khxZZzFJznKyzEkuXm-WN873TYP7JSV0euSUiUfJIq9KlnEp86NkQRjhWcnJ9-PkJIQNIYQzWT5JjhnLCSkqskh-rK6-Xb7PcvkmXSvfYRa06jHVru9RD2aPqYqHs6_Szu3R2y3aITV2QL-Pt78BZZt0uMbUbHfOD8pqTF2bDn4Mw9Pkcav6gM9uz9Pk68cPX1afs_XVp8vVxTrTgrEhq1ExXvGibUmNJdVUNVrSBnWLtFKKt0Vdo-RKSNrmddMIbEVFdKsLVQqUJTtNsjlvuMHdWMPOm63yv8EpA924g_jUjRAQGCFU8si_nfkIb7HRsRWv-juyuxFrriEOAEouKkpYTPDyNoF3P0cMA2xN0Nj3yqIbA9CCFwWRZSUi-vweunGjt3EcQDmRgkoipopezFQXxw_Gahdn_Gvo1BgCwIUoqjL2WcgInv1f-r-aDyuNwPkMaO9C8NiCNoOaVhU7MT3kBCYHwQYODoLJQTA7KMrFPfnhhweF72YhxkXvDXoI2mB0Q2N8tBI0zjyU4g_NnOYH |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1002_casp_2868 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12889_022_14936_6 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph182010990 crossref_primary_10_1108_JGOSS_08_2022_0096 crossref_primary_10_1080_01900692_2024_2332618 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_oneear_2022_08_005 crossref_primary_10_1111_jasp_13053 crossref_primary_10_1111_conl_12950 crossref_primary_10_1017_S1755773924000250 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_3801843 crossref_primary_10_2147_RMHP_S365233 crossref_primary_10_3145_epi_2021_nov_06 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2022_996546 crossref_primary_10_11648_j_ss_20251404_15 crossref_primary_10_1093_her_cyaf009 crossref_primary_10_1093_eurpub_ckac101 crossref_primary_10_1111_polp_12404 crossref_primary_10_1038_s43247_023_00755_z crossref_primary_10_1111_ajsp_12589 crossref_primary_10_1002_adts_202100343 crossref_primary_10_1017_dmp_2021_206 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0291329 crossref_primary_10_1017_S1755773924000158 crossref_primary_10_1007_s41649_021_00174_2 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tre_2022_102736 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijdrr_2022_102983 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2021_723518 crossref_primary_10_1080_07036337_2022_2068539 crossref_primary_10_1111_psj_70037 crossref_primary_10_1177_14034948241290282 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heliyon_2024_e28346 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2022_810951 crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000041138 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11205_023_03140_7 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjgh_2021_006691 crossref_primary_10_1111_1467_9477_12261 crossref_primary_10_2471_BLT_20_285322 crossref_primary_10_1038_s44271_023_00046_5 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00168_023_01243_0 crossref_primary_10_1186_s41256_022_00280_0 crossref_primary_10_1111_risa_14305 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph20156512 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolecon_2021_107259 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0311825 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2025_1574840 crossref_primary_10_3390_healthcare9111498 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_copsyc_2021_09_007 crossref_primary_10_1111_1475_6765_12513 crossref_primary_10_1111_disa_12610 crossref_primary_10_1109_TAFFC_2023_3293310 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijid_2022_06_012 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpos_2022_948137 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph19127261 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2022_1030125 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph192214999 crossref_primary_10_1386_ajms_00175_1 crossref_primary_10_3917_edd_351_0111 crossref_primary_10_1111_spc3_12732 crossref_primary_10_3390_land12020466 crossref_primary_10_4081_gh_2023_1168 crossref_primary_10_3389_fsufs_2023_983063 crossref_primary_10_1111_risa_13985 crossref_primary_10_1093_erae_jbac036 crossref_primary_10_3390_socsci11030123 crossref_primary_10_1080_17516234_2024_2351726 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_eiar_2025_108062 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12913_025_13033_9 crossref_primary_10_1177_09636625241302970 crossref_primary_10_3390_life11030220 crossref_primary_10_1111_1475_6765_12529 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11127_024_01166_0 crossref_primary_10_3390_economies10120320 crossref_primary_10_1108_JEC_12_2021_0175 crossref_primary_10_1590_1413_81232022278_06282021 crossref_primary_10_1177_00145858231166913 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1007/s13280-019-01284-w 10.1146/annurev.ps.31.020180.001125 10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01198.x 10.1017/S1755773911000051 10.1038/d41586-020-01812-9 10.1038/415137a 10.1257/jep.14.3.137 10.1257/jep.25.4.191 10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.06.009 10.1162/qjec.2010.125.3.1015 10.1098/rstb.2008.0275 10.1126/science.abc0035 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | 2020 Elsevier Ltd 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. COPYRIGHT 2021 Elsevier Science Publishers Copyright Pergamon Press Inc. Feb 2021 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 2020 Elsevier Ltd |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: 2020 Elsevier Ltd – notice: 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. – notice: COPYRIGHT 2021 Elsevier Science Publishers – notice: Copyright Pergamon Press Inc. Feb 2021 – notice: 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 2020 Elsevier Ltd |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION NPM 7ST 7TQ 7U6 8BJ C1K DHY DON FQK JBE 7X8 5PM ADTPV AOWAS F1U |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105236 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef PubMed Environment Abstracts PAIS Index Sustainability Science Abstracts International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS) Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management PAIS International PAIS International (Ovid) International Bibliography of the Social Sciences International Bibliography of the Social Sciences MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) SwePub SwePub Articles SWEPUB Göteborgs universitet |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS) Environment Abstracts Sustainability Science Abstracts PAIS International Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | PubMed MEDLINE - Academic International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS) |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: 7X8 name: MEDLINE - Academic url: https://search.proquest.com/medline sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Economics Political Science |
| EISSN | 1873-5991 0305-750X |
| EndPage | 105236 |
| ExternalDocumentID | oai_gup_ub_gu_se_300295 PMC7568203 A648797349 33100480 10_1016_j_worlddev_2020_105236 S0305750X20303636 |
| Genre | Journal Article |
| GroupedDBID | --K --M -ET -~X .~1 0R~ 0SF 123 1B1 1OL 1RT 1~. 1~5 29R 3R3 4.4 457 4G. 5VS 63O 7-5 71M 85S 8P~ 9JO AABNK AACTN AAEDT AAEDW AAFFL AAFJI AAIAV AAIKJ AAKOC AALRI AAOAW AAPFB AAQFI AAQXK AAXUO AAYOK ABFNM ABFRF ABFSI ABJNI ABLJU ABMAC ABMMH ABTAH ABXDB ABYKQ ACCUC ACDAQ ACGFO ACGFS ACHQT ACIUM ACNCT ACRLP ACROA ADBBV ADEZE ADFHU ADIYS ADMUD AEBSH AEFWE AEHKV AEKER AETEA AEYQN AFFNX AFKWA AFMIJ AFODL AFRAH AFTJW AFTVO AGHFR AGHSJ AGTHC AGUBO AGYEJ AHHHB AIEXJ AIIAU AIKHN AITUG AJBFU AJOXV AJWLA AKYCK ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMFUW AMRAJ AOMHK ASPBG AVARZ AVWKF AXJTR AXLSJ AZFZN BEHZQ BEZPJ BGSCR BKOJK BKOMP BLXMC BNTGB BPUDD BULVW BZJEE CS3 EBS EFJIC EFLBG EJD EO8 EO9 EP2 EP3 F5P FDB FEDTE FGOYB FIRID FNPLU FYGXN G-2 G-Q GBLVA HLV HMB HMY HVGLF HZ~ I.T IHE IXIXF J1W KOM LPU LW9 LY5 M3Y M41 MO0 MS~ MVM N9A NCXOZ O-L O9- OAUVE OZT P-8 P-9 P2P PC. PQQKQ PRBVW Q38 R2- RIG ROL RPZ RXW SAB SCC SDF SDG SDP SEB SEE SES SEW SPCBC SSB SSF SSO SSS SSZ T5K TAE TN5 U5U UHB ULY UQL WH7 WUQ XFK YK3 YYP ZCA ZCG ZKB ZY4 ~G- ~KM 9DU AATTM AAXKI AAYWO AAYXX ABUFD ABWVN ACLOT ACRPL ACVFH ADCNI ADMHG ADNMO ADVLN ADXHL AEIPS AEUPX AFJKZ AFPUW AGQPQ AIGII AIIUN AKBMS AKRWK AKYEP ANKPU APXCP CITATION EFKBS ~HD NPM 7ST 7TQ 7U6 8BJ C1K DHY DON FQK JBE 7X8 5PM ADTPV AOWAS F1U |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c633t-bea35854ff0be72c2adc92decfe28aa5f4bbe95a692f1bdd6ef680cfc4a76e973 |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 83 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000601162800003&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 0305-750X 1873-5991 |
| IngestDate | Tue Nov 04 16:59:16 EST 2025 Tue Nov 04 02:05:28 EST 2025 Wed Oct 01 13:09:18 EDT 2025 Sat Nov 08 21:39:00 EST 2025 Thu Nov 13 16:11:12 EST 2025 Wed Feb 19 02:06:52 EST 2025 Sat Nov 29 07:24:06 EST 2025 Tue Nov 18 21:12:20 EST 2025 Fri Feb 23 02:46:56 EST 2024 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | February 2021 |
| Keywords | COVID-19 Large-scale collective action Collective action capital Government intervention Trust Social dilemma |
| Language | English |
| License | 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
| LinkModel | OpenURL |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c633t-bea35854ff0be72c2adc92decfe28aa5f4bbe95a692f1bdd6ef680cfc4a76e973 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
| OpenAccessLink | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC7568203 |
| PMID | 33100480 |
| PQID | 2509629065 |
| PQPubID | 46158 |
| PageCount | 1 |
| ParticipantIDs | swepub_primary_oai_gup_ub_gu_se_300295 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7568203 proquest_miscellaneous_2454409786 proquest_journals_2509629065 gale_incontextgauss__A648797349 pubmed_primary_33100480 crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_worlddev_2020_105236 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_worlddev_2020_105236 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_worlddev_2020_105236 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2021-02-01 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2021-02-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 02 year: 2021 text: 2021-02-01 day: 01 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | England |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England – name: Oxford |
| PublicationTitle | World development |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | World Dev |
| PublicationYear | 2021 |
| Publisher | Elsevier Ltd Elsevier Science Publishers Pergamon Press Inc |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier Ltd – name: Elsevier Science Publishers – name: Pergamon Press Inc |
| References | Aghion, Algan, Cahuc, Shleifer (b0005) 2010; 125 Ravetz (b0090) 1999; 31 Saltelli, Bammer, Bruno, Charters, Di Fiore, Didier, Vineis (b0100) 2020; 582 Sabat, Neuman-Böhme, Varghese, Barros, Brouwer, van Exel, Stargardt (b0095) 2020 Olewe, D. (2020). Coronavirus in Africa: Emergency laws vs individual rights. BBC News, April 9, 2020. Retrieved from Fehr, Gächter (b0025) 2002; 415 Lynch, P. &, Khoo, A. (2020). Coronavirus: Volunteers flock to join community support groups. BBC News, March 22, 2020. Retrieved from Walker, Whittaker, Watson, Baguelin, Winskill, Hamlet, Ghani (b0105) 2020; 369 Cohen, Kupferschmidt (b0015) 2020 Gneezy, Meier, Rey-Biel (b0045) 2011; 25 Freeman, A. L. J., Schneider, C. R., Dryhurst, S., Kerr, J., Recchia, G., van der Bles, A. M., & Linden, S. V. D. (2020). Risk perception of COVID-19/coronavirus. August 1, 2020. Henley, J. (2020). Critics question Swedish approach as coronavirus death toll reaches 1,000. Guardian, April 15, 2020. Retrieved from Ostrom (b0085) 2000; 14 Hale, T., Angrist, N., Kira, B., Petherick, A., Phillips, T., & Webster, S. (2020). Variation in government responses to COVID-19. Version 6.0. Blavatnik School of Government Working Paper. May 25, 2020. Retrieved from McCright, Dunlap (b0075) 2011; 52 Charron, Harring, Lapuente (b0010) 2020 . (Accessed August 17, 2020). Jagers, Harring, Löfgren, Sjöstedt, Alpizar, Brülde, Langlet, Nilsson, Almroth, Dupont, Steffen (b0060) 2020; 49 Gächter, Herrmann (b0040) 2009; 364 Rothstein, Samanni, Teorell (bib106) 2012; 4 Dawes (b0020) 1980; 31 Lempinen, Edward. (2020). Bitter partisan divide shapes California opinion on COVID-19, poll finds. Berkeley News, May 1, 2020. Retrieved from McCright (10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105236_b0075) 2011; 52 Gneezy (10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105236_b0045) 2011; 25 Ravetz (10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105236_b0090) 1999; 31 Saltelli (10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105236_b0100) 2020; 582 Dawes (10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105236_b0020) 1980; 31 Aghion (10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105236_b0005) 2010; 125 Ostrom (10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105236_b0085) 2000; 14 Rothstein (10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105236_bib106) 2012; 4 Fehr (10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105236_b0025) 2002; 415 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105236_b0050 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105236_b0030 Jagers (10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105236_b0060) 2020; 49 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105236_b0080 Sabat (10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105236_b0095) 2020 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105236_b0070 Walker (10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105236_b0105) 2020; 369 Cohen (10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105236_b0015) 2020 Gächter (10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105236_b0040) 2009; 364 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105236_b0065 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105236_b0055 Charron (10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105236_b0010) 2020 |
| References_xml | – year: 2020 ident: b0095 article-title: United but divided: Policy responses and people’s perceptions in the EU during the COVID-19 outbreak publication-title: Health Policy – reference: Henley, J. (2020). Critics question Swedish approach as coronavirus death toll reaches 1,000. Guardian, April 15, 2020. Retrieved from < – volume: 4 start-page: 1 year: 2012 end-page: 28 ident: bib106 article-title: Explaining the welfare state: power resources vs. the Quality of Government. publication-title: European Political Science Review – volume: 415 start-page: 137 year: 2002 end-page: 140 ident: b0025 article-title: Altruistic punishment in humans publication-title: Nature – volume: 25 start-page: 191 year: 2011 end-page: 210 ident: b0045 article-title: When and why incentives (don’t) work to modify behavior publication-title: Journal of Economic Perspectives – volume: 49 start-page: 1282 year: 2020 end-page: 1296 ident: b0060 article-title: On the preconditions for large-scale collective action publication-title: Ambio – reference: >. – year: 2020 ident: b0010 article-title: Trust, regulation, and redistribution why some governments overregulate and under-redistribute publication-title: Regulation & Governance – reference: > (Accessed August 17, 2020). – volume: 369 start-page: 413 year: 2020 ident: b0105 article-title: The impact of COVID-19 and strategies for mitigation and suppression in low- and middle-income countries publication-title: Science – volume: 31 start-page: 169 year: 1980 end-page: 193 ident: b0020 article-title: Social dilemmas publication-title: Annual Review of Psychology – reference: Freeman, A. L. J., Schneider, C. R., Dryhurst, S., Kerr, J., Recchia, G., van der Bles, A. M., & Linden, S. V. D. (2020). Risk perception of COVID-19/coronavirus. August 1, 2020. < – volume: 52 start-page: 155 year: 2011 end-page: 194 ident: b0075 article-title: The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public’s views of global warming, 2001–2010 publication-title: Sociological Quarterly – reference: Lempinen, Edward. (2020). Bitter partisan divide shapes California opinion on COVID-19, poll finds. Berkeley News, May 1, 2020. Retrieved from < – volume: 582 start-page: 482 year: 2020 end-page: 484 ident: b0100 article-title: Five ways to ensure that models serve society: A manifesto publication-title: Nature – reference: Olewe, D. (2020). Coronavirus in Africa: Emergency laws vs individual rights. BBC News, April 9, 2020. Retrieved from < – year: 2020 ident: b0015 article-title: Mass testing, school closings, lockdowns: Countries pick tactics in “war” against coronavirus publication-title: Science – volume: 14 start-page: 137 year: 2000 end-page: 158 ident: b0085 article-title: Collective action and the evolution of social norms publication-title: Journal of Economic Perspectives – volume: 125 start-page: 1015 year: 2010 end-page: 1049 ident: b0005 article-title: Regulation and distrust publication-title: Quarterly Journal of Economics – volume: 31 start-page: 647 year: 1999 end-page: 653 ident: b0090 article-title: What is post-normal science publication-title: Futures – volume: 364 start-page: 791 year: 2009 end-page: 806 ident: b0040 article-title: Reciprocity, culture and human cooperation: Previous insights and a new cross-cultural experiment publication-title: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences – reference: Hale, T., Angrist, N., Kira, B., Petherick, A., Phillips, T., & Webster, S. (2020). Variation in government responses to COVID-19. Version 6.0. Blavatnik School of Government Working Paper. May 25, 2020. Retrieved from < – reference: Lynch, P. &, Khoo, A. (2020). Coronavirus: Volunteers flock to join community support groups. BBC News, March 22, 2020. Retrieved from < – year: 2020 ident: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105236_b0015 article-title: Mass testing, school closings, lockdowns: Countries pick tactics in “war” against coronavirus publication-title: Science – volume: 49 start-page: 1282 year: 2020 ident: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105236_b0060 article-title: On the preconditions for large-scale collective action publication-title: Ambio doi: 10.1007/s13280-019-01284-w – ident: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105236_b0070 – volume: 31 start-page: 169 issue: 1 year: 1980 ident: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105236_b0020 article-title: Social dilemmas publication-title: Annual Review of Psychology doi: 10.1146/annurev.ps.31.020180.001125 – ident: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105236_b0050 – volume: 52 start-page: 155 issue: 2 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105236_b0075 article-title: The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public’s views of global warming, 2001–2010 publication-title: Sociological Quarterly doi: 10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01198.x – volume: 4 start-page: 1 issue: 1 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105236_bib106 article-title: Explaining the welfare state: power resources vs. the Quality of Government. publication-title: European Political Science Review doi: 10.1017/S1755773911000051 – volume: 582 start-page: 482 year: 2020 ident: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105236_b0100 article-title: Five ways to ensure that models serve society: A manifesto publication-title: Nature doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-01812-9 – volume: 415 start-page: 137 issue: 6868 year: 2002 ident: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105236_b0025 article-title: Altruistic punishment in humans publication-title: Nature doi: 10.1038/415137a – ident: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105236_b0055 – volume: 14 start-page: 137 issue: 3 year: 2000 ident: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105236_b0085 article-title: Collective action and the evolution of social norms publication-title: Journal of Economic Perspectives doi: 10.1257/jep.14.3.137 – volume: 31 start-page: 647 year: 1999 ident: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105236_b0090 article-title: What is post-normal science publication-title: Futures – year: 2020 ident: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105236_b0010 article-title: Trust, regulation, and redistribution why some governments overregulate and under-redistribute publication-title: Regulation & Governance – volume: 25 start-page: 191 issue: 4 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105236_b0045 article-title: When and why incentives (don’t) work to modify behavior publication-title: Journal of Economic Perspectives doi: 10.1257/jep.25.4.191 – ident: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105236_b0030 – year: 2020 ident: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105236_b0095 article-title: United but divided: Policy responses and people’s perceptions in the EU during the COVID-19 outbreak publication-title: Health Policy doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.06.009 – volume: 125 start-page: 1015 issue: 3 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105236_b0005 article-title: Regulation and distrust publication-title: Quarterly Journal of Economics doi: 10.1162/qjec.2010.125.3.1015 – ident: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105236_b0065 – ident: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105236_b0080 – volume: 364 start-page: 791 issue: 1518 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105236_b0040 article-title: Reciprocity, culture and human cooperation: Previous insights and a new cross-cultural experiment publication-title: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0275 – volume: 369 start-page: 413 issue: 6502 year: 2020 ident: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105236_b0105 article-title: The impact of COVID-19 and strategies for mitigation and suppression in low- and middle-income countries publication-title: Science doi: 10.1126/science.abc0035 |
| SSID | ssj0005397 |
| Score | 2.5843437 |
| Snippet | •Country variations in COVID-19 policy interventions are understood by applying collective action theory.•Through comparison with other large-scale collective... In this article we apply a large-scale collective action framework on the spread of the COVID-19 virus. We compare the pandemic with other large-scale... * Reciprocal trust is a relevant factor when analyzing policy responses to the pandemic worldwide. In this article we apply a large-scale collective action... • Country variations in COVID-19 policy interventions are understood by applying collective action theory. • Through comparison with other large-scale... |
| SourceID | swepub pubmedcentral proquest gale pubmed crossref elsevier |
| SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
| StartPage | 105236 |
| SubjectTerms | Analysis Antimicrobial resistance Best interests Biodiversity Biodiversity loss Citizens Climate change Collective action Collective action capital Coronaviruses COVID-19 COVID-19 Large-scale collective action Trust Social dilemma Government intervention Collective action capital Drug resistance Drug resistance in microorganisms Economics Epidemics Global temperature changes Government intervention Large-scale collective action Nationalekonomi Pandemics Political Science Political Science (Excluding Peace and Conflict Studies) Resistance Social dilemma State intervention Statsvetenskap Statsvetenskap (Exklusive freds- och konfliktforskning) Trust Viewpoint, Policy Forum or Opinion Viruses |
| Title | COVID-19: Large-scale collective action, government intervention, and the importance of trust |
| URI | https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105236 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33100480 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2509629065 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2454409786 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC7568203 https://gup.ub.gu.se/publication/300295 |
| Volume | 138 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos000601162800003&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVESC databaseName: ScienceDirect Freedom Collection customDbUrl: eissn: 1873-5991 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0005397 issn: 1873-5991 databaseCode: AIEXJ dateStart: 20160601 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.sciencedirect.com providerName: Elsevier |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1bb9MwFLbYhmAviDuBMYyEeFogd8e8lTHEUFUeGFNfkOW4TukuadWsaD-fc-w4aatNgwde0ubi3M7nk2P783cIeVOwXIWScR9-Mj_hMvVlwBXUq0TC90EVpZFdPO6zwSAfDrkb0a1NOgFWVfnlJZ_9V1PDNjA2Tp39B3O3J4UN8B-MDkswOyz_yvD7344PP_khx7Z-H3nefg12QFK66aJHppCdzIBvd9ym2jXCEY796DidGJVOzk2Ijg4A-QQ4R2M5orVsnFHHPep82nzeJEwZTE7PZMdVRNkMA5_vcPFTPe96avs4bv8xK8dz6w1xNU9rudw3EYWOzty6MPAmPsQkwxV_a-VcGo8ZYr90dqUzt_0KJ--Mdiw8B7TmI5OYeK0AvM_ZubFmjMMViU0NtSaj7XZtkK2IpRwc4Fbv8GD4teMDxSYTT3vLS9PJr76FbXLHnfS6oGb9K78U5qxTcFeEak1wc3Sf3GtaJbRn0fSA3NLVQ3LXTVqvH5GfDlUf6BKmaIcpajG1RztE0WVE7VHAEwU80Q5PdFpSg6fH5Mfng6P9L36TmcNXWRxf-IWWMbQzk7IMCs0iFcmR4tFIq1JHuZRpmRSF5qnMeFSGxWiU6TLLA1WqRLJMcxY_IZvVtNLPCC1UoAIdqSDnRRKUimvOC8ZkoGUWyjzySOperVCNbD1mTzkTjp94Ipx1BFpHWOt45H1bbmaFW24swZ3lRBN-2rBSACBvLPsKTS1QUaVCytZYLupaiF6W5AyeN-Ee2XEoEI23qEWE4kuYcCH1yOt2Nzh4HLWTlZ4u4JgkTVCULoeLPLWgaR_I4c8jbAVO7QEoHr-6p5r8MiLyLM0g-I898tYCb6XIeDETsGm8ELUWMY7cp8-vvfgLst3V_R2yCcDRL8lt9ftiUs93yQYb5rtNZfsDvVTr-g |
| linkProvider | Elsevier |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=COVID-19%3A+Large-scale+collective+action%2C+government+intervention%2C+and+the+importance+of+trust&rft.jtitle=World+development&rft.au=Harring%2C+Niklas&rft.au=Jagers%2C+Sverker+C&rft.au=L%C3%B6fgren%2C+%C3%85sa&rft.date=2021-02-01&rft.issn=0305-750X&rft.volume=138&rft.spage=105236&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.worlddev.2020.105236&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F33100480&rft.externalDocID=33100480 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0305-750X&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0305-750X&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0305-750X&client=summon |