The Sources of the Communication Gap

Face-to-face communication drastically increases cooperation rates in social dilemmas. We test which factors are the most important drivers of this communication gap. We distinguish three main categories. First, communication may decrease social distance. Second, communication may enable subjects to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Management science Jg. 63; H. 9; S. 2832 - 2846
Hauptverfasser: He, Simin, Offerman, Theo, van de Ven, Jeroen
Format: Journal Article
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: Linthicum INFORMS 01.09.2017
Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences
Schlagworte:
ISSN:0025-1909, 1526-5501
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Face-to-face communication drastically increases cooperation rates in social dilemmas. We test which factors are the most important drivers of this communication gap. We distinguish three main categories. First, communication may decrease social distance. Second, communication may enable subjects to assess their opponent’s cooperativeness (“type detection”) and condition their own action on that information. Third, communication allows subjects to make promises, which create commitment for subjects who do not want to break a promise. We find that communication increases cooperation very substantially. In our experiment, we find that commitment value is an important factor, but the largest part of the increase can be attributed to type detection. We do not find evidence that social distance plays a role. Data, as supplemental material, are available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2518 . This paper was accepted by Uri Gneezy, operations management .
Bibliographie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0025-1909
1526-5501
DOI:10.1287/mnsc.2016.2518