How to foster agroecological innovations? A comparison of participatory design methods

Facing contemporary environmental crisis implies fostering agroecological innovations that take into account local ecological regulations and rely on multiple stakeholders' innovation capacities. This paper draws on two fields of literature that remain unconnected so far: participatory approach...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of environmental planning and management Vol. 59; no. 2; pp. 280 - 301
Main Authors: Berthet, Elsa T.A., Barnaud, Cécile, Girard, Nathalie, Labatut, Julie, Martin, Guillaume
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Abingdon Routledge 01.02.2016
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Taylor & Francis (Routledge): STM, Behavioural Science and Public Health Titles
Subjects:
ISSN:1360-0559, 0964-0568, 1360-0559
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Facing contemporary environmental crisis implies fostering agroecological innovations that take into account local ecological regulations and rely on multiple stakeholders' innovation capacities. This paper draws on two fields of literature that remain unconnected so far: participatory approaches and design sciences. It proposes an analysis grid to support a reflexive analysis of cases of implementation of three participatory design methods: ComMod (Companion Modelling for concerted management of natural resources), Forage Rummy (simulation-based board game for designing farming systems) and KCP (collective design workshops to foster innovation). This analysis highlights key features of the methods in view of agroecological innovation challenges, focusing on knowledge management and organisation for exploration.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2015.1009627
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1360-0559
0964-0568
1360-0559
DOI:10.1080/09640568.2015.1009627