How to foster agroecological innovations? A comparison of participatory design methods

Facing contemporary environmental crisis implies fostering agroecological innovations that take into account local ecological regulations and rely on multiple stakeholders' innovation capacities. This paper draws on two fields of literature that remain unconnected so far: participatory approach...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of environmental planning and management Jg. 59; H. 2; S. 280 - 301
Hauptverfasser: Berthet, Elsa T.A., Barnaud, Cécile, Girard, Nathalie, Labatut, Julie, Martin, Guillaume
Format: Journal Article
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: Abingdon Routledge 01.02.2016
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Taylor & Francis (Routledge): STM, Behavioural Science and Public Health Titles
Schlagworte:
Agrarian structures
Agriculture
agroecology
Biodiversity and Ecology
Board games
Boards
Co-design
Comparative analysis
Computer simulation
Design
Design analysis
Design engineering
design methods
Design techniques
Environment management
Environmental degradation
Environmental regulations
Environmental Sciences
Exploration
Farming
Farming systems
forage
Forages
Games
Implementation
Innovation
Innovations
Interest groups
Knowledge management
Natural resource management
Natural resources
participatory methods
Regulation
Resource management
Simulation
stakeholders
Studies
Workshops
innovation
knowledge management
design methods
participatory methods
agroecology
ISSN:1360-0559, 0964-0568, 1360-0559
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Facing contemporary environmental crisis implies fostering agroecological innovations that take into account local ecological regulations and rely on multiple stakeholders' innovation capacities. This paper draws on two fields of literature that remain unconnected so far: participatory approaches and design sciences. It proposes an analysis grid to support a reflexive analysis of cases of implementation of three participatory design methods: ComMod (Companion Modelling for concerted management of natural resources), Forage Rummy (simulation-based board game for designing farming systems) and KCP (collective design workshops to foster innovation). This analysis highlights key features of the methods in view of agroecological innovation challenges, focusing on knowledge management and organisation for exploration.
Bibliographie:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2015.1009627
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1360-0559
0964-0568
1360-0559
DOI:10.1080/09640568.2015.1009627