A case-series test of the interactive two-step model of lexical access: Predicting word repetition from picture naming

Lexical access in language production, and particularly pathologies of lexical access, are often investigated by examining errors in picture naming and word repetition. In this article, we test a computational approach to lexical access, the two-step interactive model, by examining whether the model...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of memory and language Vol. 56; no. 4; pp. 490 - 520
Main Authors: Dell, Gary S., Martin, Nadine, Schwartz, Myrna F.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: San Diego, CA Elsevier Inc 01.05.2007
Elsevier
Elsevier BV
Subjects:
ISSN:0749-596X, 1096-0821
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Lexical access in language production, and particularly pathologies of lexical access, are often investigated by examining errors in picture naming and word repetition. In this article, we test a computational approach to lexical access, the two-step interactive model, by examining whether the model can quantitatively predict the repetition-error patterns of 65 aphasic subjects from their naming errors. The model’s characterizations of the subjects’ naming errors were taken from the companion paper to this one (Schwartz, M. F., Dell, G. S., Martin, N., Gahl, S., & Sobel, P. (2006). A case-series test of the interactive two-step model of lexical access: evidence from picture naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 228–264), and their repetition was predicted from the model on the assumption that naming involves two error prone steps, word and phonological retrieval, whereas repetition only creates errors in the second of these steps. A version of the model in which lexical–semantic and lexical–phonological connections could be independently lesioned was generally successful in predicting repetition for the aphasics. An analysis of the few cases in which model predictions were inaccurate revealed the role of input phonology in the repetition task.
Bibliography:SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-News-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0749-596X
1096-0821
DOI:10.1016/j.jml.2006.05.007