Computational comparison of common event-based differential splicing tools: practical considerations for laboratory researchers
Background Computational tools analyzing RNA-sequencing data have boosted alternative splicing research by identifying and assessing differentially spliced genes. However, common alternative splicing analysis tools differ substantially in their statistical analyses and general performance. This repo...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | BMC bioinformatics Jg. 22; H. 1; S. 1 - 15 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
London
BioMed Central
26.06.2021
BioMed Central Ltd Springer Nature B.V BMC |
| Schlagworte: | |
| ISSN: | 1471-2105, 1471-2105 |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| Abstract | Background
Computational tools analyzing RNA-sequencing data have boosted alternative splicing research by identifying and assessing differentially spliced genes. However, common alternative splicing analysis tools differ substantially in their statistical analyses and general performance. This report compares the computational performance (CPU utilization and RAM usage) of three event-level splicing tools; rMATS, MISO, and SUPPA2. Additionally, concordance between tool outputs was investigated.
Results
Log-linear relations were found between job times and dataset size in all splicing tools and all virtual machine (VM) configurations. MISO had the highest job times for all analyses, irrespective of VM size, while MISO analyses also exceeded maximum CPU utilization on all VM sizes. rMATS and SUPPA2 load averages were relatively low in both size and replicate comparisons, not nearing maximum CPU utilization in the VM simulating the lowest computational power (D2 VM). RAM usage in rMATS and SUPPA2 did not exceed 20% of maximum RAM in both size and replicate comparisons while MISO reached maximum RAM usage in D2 VM analyses for input size. Correlation coefficients of differential splicing analyses showed high correlation (β > 80%) between different tool outputs with the exception of comparisons of retained intron (RI) events between rMATS/MISO and rMATS/SUPPA2 (β < 60%).
Conclusions
Prior to RNA-seq analyses, users should consider job time, amount of replicates and splice event type of interest to determine the optimal alternative splicing tool. In general, rMATS is superior to both MISO and SUPPA2 in computational performance. Analysis outputs show high concordance between tools, with the exception of RI events. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Background
Computational tools analyzing RNA-sequencing data have boosted alternative splicing research by identifying and assessing differentially spliced genes. However, common alternative splicing analysis tools differ substantially in their statistical analyses and general performance. This report compares the computational performance (CPU utilization and RAM usage) of three event-level splicing tools; rMATS, MISO, and SUPPA2. Additionally, concordance between tool outputs was investigated.
Results
Log-linear relations were found between job times and dataset size in all splicing tools and all virtual machine (VM) configurations. MISO had the highest job times for all analyses, irrespective of VM size, while MISO analyses also exceeded maximum CPU utilization on all VM sizes. rMATS and SUPPA2 load averages were relatively low in both size and replicate comparisons, not nearing maximum CPU utilization in the VM simulating the lowest computational power (D2 VM). RAM usage in rMATS and SUPPA2 did not exceed 20% of maximum RAM in both size and replicate comparisons while MISO reached maximum RAM usage in D2 VM analyses for input size. Correlation coefficients of differential splicing analyses showed high correlation (β > 80%) between different tool outputs with the exception of comparisons of retained intron (RI) events between rMATS/MISO and rMATS/SUPPA2 (β < 60%).
Conclusions
Prior to RNA-seq analyses, users should consider job time, amount of replicates and splice event type of interest to determine the optimal alternative splicing tool. In general, rMATS is superior to both MISO and SUPPA2 in computational performance. Analysis outputs show high concordance between tools, with the exception of RI events. Computational tools analyzing RNA-sequencing data have boosted alternative splicing research by identifying and assessing differentially spliced genes. However, common alternative splicing analysis tools differ substantially in their statistical analyses and general performance. This report compares the computational performance (CPU utilization and RAM usage) of three event-level splicing tools; rMATS, MISO, and SUPPA2. Additionally, concordance between tool outputs was investigated. Log-linear relations were found between job times and dataset size in all splicing tools and all virtual machine (VM) configurations. MISO had the highest job times for all analyses, irrespective of VM size, while MISO analyses also exceeded maximum CPU utilization on all VM sizes. rMATS and SUPPA2 load averages were relatively low in both size and replicate comparisons, not nearing maximum CPU utilization in the VM simulating the lowest computational power (D2 VM). RAM usage in rMATS and SUPPA2 did not exceed 20% of maximum RAM in both size and replicate comparisons while MISO reached maximum RAM usage in D2 VM analyses for input size. Correlation coefficients of differential splicing analyses showed high correlation ([beta] > 80%) between different tool outputs with the exception of comparisons of retained intron (RI) events between rMATS/MISO and rMATS/SUPPA2 ([beta] < 60%). Prior to RNA-seq analyses, users should consider job time, amount of replicates and splice event type of interest to determine the optimal alternative splicing tool. In general, rMATS is superior to both MISO and SUPPA2 in computational performance. Analysis outputs show high concordance between tools, with the exception of RI events. Abstract Background Computational tools analyzing RNA-sequencing data have boosted alternative splicing research by identifying and assessing differentially spliced genes. However, common alternative splicing analysis tools differ substantially in their statistical analyses and general performance. This report compares the computational performance (CPU utilization and RAM usage) of three event-level splicing tools; rMATS, MISO, and SUPPA2. Additionally, concordance between tool outputs was investigated. Results Log-linear relations were found between job times and dataset size in all splicing tools and all virtual machine (VM) configurations. MISO had the highest job times for all analyses, irrespective of VM size, while MISO analyses also exceeded maximum CPU utilization on all VM sizes. rMATS and SUPPA2 load averages were relatively low in both size and replicate comparisons, not nearing maximum CPU utilization in the VM simulating the lowest computational power (D2 VM). RAM usage in rMATS and SUPPA2 did not exceed 20% of maximum RAM in both size and replicate comparisons while MISO reached maximum RAM usage in D2 VM analyses for input size. Correlation coefficients of differential splicing analyses showed high correlation (β > 80%) between different tool outputs with the exception of comparisons of retained intron (RI) events between rMATS/MISO and rMATS/SUPPA2 (β < 60%). Conclusions Prior to RNA-seq analyses, users should consider job time, amount of replicates and splice event type of interest to determine the optimal alternative splicing tool. In general, rMATS is superior to both MISO and SUPPA2 in computational performance. Analysis outputs show high concordance between tools, with the exception of RI events. Background Computational tools analyzing RNA-sequencing data have boosted alternative splicing research by identifying and assessing differentially spliced genes. However, common alternative splicing analysis tools differ substantially in their statistical analyses and general performance. This report compares the computational performance (CPU utilization and RAM usage) of three event-level splicing tools; rMATS, MISO, and SUPPA2. Additionally, concordance between tool outputs was investigated. Results Log-linear relations were found between job times and dataset size in all splicing tools and all virtual machine (VM) configurations. MISO had the highest job times for all analyses, irrespective of VM size, while MISO analyses also exceeded maximum CPU utilization on all VM sizes. rMATS and SUPPA2 load averages were relatively low in both size and replicate comparisons, not nearing maximum CPU utilization in the VM simulating the lowest computational power (D2 VM). RAM usage in rMATS and SUPPA2 did not exceed 20% of maximum RAM in both size and replicate comparisons while MISO reached maximum RAM usage in D2 VM analyses for input size. Correlation coefficients of differential splicing analyses showed high correlation (β > 80%) between different tool outputs with the exception of comparisons of retained intron (RI) events between rMATS/MISO and rMATS/SUPPA2 (β < 60%). Conclusions Prior to RNA-seq analyses, users should consider job time, amount of replicates and splice event type of interest to determine the optimal alternative splicing tool. In general, rMATS is superior to both MISO and SUPPA2 in computational performance. Analysis outputs show high concordance between tools, with the exception of RI events. Computational tools analyzing RNA-sequencing data have boosted alternative splicing research by identifying and assessing differentially spliced genes. However, common alternative splicing analysis tools differ substantially in their statistical analyses and general performance. This report compares the computational performance (CPU utilization and RAM usage) of three event-level splicing tools; rMATS, MISO, and SUPPA2. Additionally, concordance between tool outputs was investigated.BACKGROUNDComputational tools analyzing RNA-sequencing data have boosted alternative splicing research by identifying and assessing differentially spliced genes. However, common alternative splicing analysis tools differ substantially in their statistical analyses and general performance. This report compares the computational performance (CPU utilization and RAM usage) of three event-level splicing tools; rMATS, MISO, and SUPPA2. Additionally, concordance between tool outputs was investigated.Log-linear relations were found between job times and dataset size in all splicing tools and all virtual machine (VM) configurations. MISO had the highest job times for all analyses, irrespective of VM size, while MISO analyses also exceeded maximum CPU utilization on all VM sizes. rMATS and SUPPA2 load averages were relatively low in both size and replicate comparisons, not nearing maximum CPU utilization in the VM simulating the lowest computational power (D2 VM). RAM usage in rMATS and SUPPA2 did not exceed 20% of maximum RAM in both size and replicate comparisons while MISO reached maximum RAM usage in D2 VM analyses for input size. Correlation coefficients of differential splicing analyses showed high correlation (β > 80%) between different tool outputs with the exception of comparisons of retained intron (RI) events between rMATS/MISO and rMATS/SUPPA2 (β < 60%).RESULTSLog-linear relations were found between job times and dataset size in all splicing tools and all virtual machine (VM) configurations. MISO had the highest job times for all analyses, irrespective of VM size, while MISO analyses also exceeded maximum CPU utilization on all VM sizes. rMATS and SUPPA2 load averages were relatively low in both size and replicate comparisons, not nearing maximum CPU utilization in the VM simulating the lowest computational power (D2 VM). RAM usage in rMATS and SUPPA2 did not exceed 20% of maximum RAM in both size and replicate comparisons while MISO reached maximum RAM usage in D2 VM analyses for input size. Correlation coefficients of differential splicing analyses showed high correlation (β > 80%) between different tool outputs with the exception of comparisons of retained intron (RI) events between rMATS/MISO and rMATS/SUPPA2 (β < 60%).Prior to RNA-seq analyses, users should consider job time, amount of replicates and splice event type of interest to determine the optimal alternative splicing tool. In general, rMATS is superior to both MISO and SUPPA2 in computational performance. Analysis outputs show high concordance between tools, with the exception of RI events.CONCLUSIONSPrior to RNA-seq analyses, users should consider job time, amount of replicates and splice event type of interest to determine the optimal alternative splicing tool. In general, rMATS is superior to both MISO and SUPPA2 in computational performance. Analysis outputs show high concordance between tools, with the exception of RI events. Background Computational tools analyzing RNA-sequencing data have boosted alternative splicing research by identifying and assessing differentially spliced genes. However, common alternative splicing analysis tools differ substantially in their statistical analyses and general performance. This report compares the computational performance (CPU utilization and RAM usage) of three event-level splicing tools; rMATS, MISO, and SUPPA2. Additionally, concordance between tool outputs was investigated. Results Log-linear relations were found between job times and dataset size in all splicing tools and all virtual machine (VM) configurations. MISO had the highest job times for all analyses, irrespective of VM size, while MISO analyses also exceeded maximum CPU utilization on all VM sizes. rMATS and SUPPA2 load averages were relatively low in both size and replicate comparisons, not nearing maximum CPU utilization in the VM simulating the lowest computational power (D2 VM). RAM usage in rMATS and SUPPA2 did not exceed 20% of maximum RAM in both size and replicate comparisons while MISO reached maximum RAM usage in D2 VM analyses for input size. Correlation coefficients of differential splicing analyses showed high correlation ([beta] > 80%) between different tool outputs with the exception of comparisons of retained intron (RI) events between rMATS/MISO and rMATS/SUPPA2 ([beta] < 60%). Conclusions Prior to RNA-seq analyses, users should consider job time, amount of replicates and splice event type of interest to determine the optimal alternative splicing tool. In general, rMATS is superior to both MISO and SUPPA2 in computational performance. Analysis outputs show high concordance between tools, with the exception of RI events. Keywords: Alternative splicing, RNA-sequencing, Computational performance |
| ArticleNumber | 347 |
| Audience | Academic |
| Author | Wojtuszkiewicz, Anna M. de Jonge, Robert Muller, Ittai B. Lin, Marry Kampstra, Peter van Elswijk, Michel Cloos, Jacqueline Meijers, Stijn Jansen, Gerrit van Dijk, Steven |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Ittai B. surname: Muller fullname: Muller, Ittai B. organization: Department of Clinical Chemistry, Amsterdam UMC – location VUmc – sequence: 2 givenname: Stijn surname: Meijers fullname: Meijers, Stijn organization: ORTEC Netherlands – sequence: 3 givenname: Peter surname: Kampstra fullname: Kampstra, Peter organization: ORTEC Netherlands – sequence: 4 givenname: Steven surname: van Dijk fullname: van Dijk, Steven organization: ORTEC Netherlands – sequence: 5 givenname: Michel surname: van Elswijk fullname: van Elswijk, Michel organization: ORTEC Netherlands – sequence: 6 givenname: Marry surname: Lin fullname: Lin, Marry organization: Department of Clinical Chemistry, Amsterdam UMC – location VUmc – sequence: 7 givenname: Anna M. surname: Wojtuszkiewicz fullname: Wojtuszkiewicz, Anna M. organization: Department of Hematology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Rm CCA 4.24, Amsterdam UMC – location VUmc – sequence: 8 givenname: Gerrit surname: Jansen fullname: Jansen, Gerrit organization: Amsterdam Rheumatology and immunology Center, Amsterdam UMC – location VUmc – sequence: 9 givenname: Robert surname: de Jonge fullname: de Jonge, Robert organization: Department of Clinical Chemistry, Amsterdam UMC – location VUmc – sequence: 10 givenname: Jacqueline orcidid: 0000-0001-9150-8026 surname: Cloos fullname: Cloos, Jacqueline email: j.cloos@amsterdamumc.nl organization: Department of Hematology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Rm CCA 4.24, Amsterdam UMC – location VUmc |
| BookMark | eNp9kstq3TAQhk1JaS7tC3Rl6KZdOJVkWZa6KITQy4FAoZe1kHVxdLClU8kOzaqv3vFxSnNCCVpYI33_P9bMnBZHIQZbFC8xOseYs7cZE96IChFcIUpYXYknxQmmLa4IRs3Rvf1xcZrzFiHcctQ8K45rilvKET8pfl_GcTdPavIxqKHUEKnkcwxldEs0ws7e2DBVncrWlMY7ZxPEHui8G7z2oS-nGIf8rtwlpSev9z4he2PT3jeXLqZyUF2EOKbbMtlsVdLXNuXnxVOnhmxf3H3Pih8fP3y__Fxdffm0uby4qjTDHJLThmNTEys0ZYYhpA3qGMGMwjs0wh2irrYtMUwbI3gtRNcIrbkWdeMcauuzYrP6mqi2cpf8qNKtjMrL_UFMvVQJ_n2wknLKuTbMKM0pZUIgZQTjSInaIMIoeL1fvXZzN1qjoRpJDQemhzfBX8s-3khOaoZZAwav7wxS_DnbPMnRZ22HQQUb5yxJQxshCKYL-uoBuo1zglYtVEOgnYzco3oFD_DBRcirF1N5wVpCGMd8qcH5fyhYxo4eOmadh_MDwZsDATCT_TX1as5Zbr59PWT5yuoUc07WSe3XsYIkfpAYyWVo5Tq0EoZW7odWCpCSB9K_pXxUVK-iDHDobfpXmEdUfwCsHf_c |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_3390_ijms252212097 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_isci_2025_112612 crossref_primary_10_1002_humu_24394 crossref_primary_10_3390_f15071233 crossref_primary_10_3389_fimmu_2022_1060114 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41596_023_00944_2 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijms24119641 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijms24087425 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10126_023_10196_6 crossref_primary_10_1093_brain_awad329 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41467_024_47107_9 crossref_primary_10_1146_annurev_biodatasci_020722_044021 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tree_2021_11_010 crossref_primary_10_3389_fmolb_2021_726902 crossref_primary_10_3390_cells11132110 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)38101-8 10.3791/54714 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060614-034316 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170 10.3390/cancers10110458 10.1186/s12859-014-0364-4 10.1038/nbt.3122 10.1038/nmeth.4197 10.1042/CS20160211 10.3892/br.2014.407 10.1073/pnas.1419161111 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)70697-8 10.1038/nrm.2017.27 10.1093/bib/bbz126 10.1038/nbt.3519 10.1038/nature07509 10.1182/blood-2008-08-173799 10.1186/s13059-018-1417-1 10.1093/rheumatology/keaa428 10.3390/cancers12030723 10.1186/s13045-015-0158-9 10.1007/978-1-62703-980-2_26 10.1517/17425255.2015.993316 10.1002/ijc.29919 10.1038/nrg2673 10.2174/1389202918666170215125048 10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.12.025 10.3324/haematol.2016.142794 10.1038/nmeth.1528 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635 10.1038/ng.259 10.1038/aps.2015.43 10.1093/nar/gks666 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | The Author(s) 2021 COPYRIGHT 2021 BioMed Central Ltd. 2021. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: The Author(s) 2021 – notice: COPYRIGHT 2021 BioMed Central Ltd. – notice: 2021. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
| DBID | C6C AAYXX CITATION ISR 3V. 7QO 7SC 7X7 7XB 88E 8AL 8AO 8FD 8FE 8FG 8FH 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AEUYN AFKRA ARAPS AZQEC BBNVY BENPR BGLVJ BHPHI CCPQU DWQXO FR3 FYUFA GHDGH GNUQQ HCIFZ JQ2 K7- K9. L7M LK8 L~C L~D M0N M0S M1P M7P P5Z P62 P64 PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQGLB PQQKQ PQUKI Q9U 7X8 5PM DOA |
| DOI | 10.1186/s12859-021-04263-9 |
| DatabaseName | Springer Nature OA Free Journals CrossRef Science in Context ProQuest Central (Corporate) Biotechnology Research Abstracts Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) Computing Database (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Pharma Collection Technology Research Database ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Technology Collection ProQuest Natural Science Collection Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest One Sustainability ProQuest Central UK/Ireland Advanced Technologies & Computer Science Collection ProQuest Central Essentials Biological Science Collection ProQuest Central Technology Collection Natural Science Collection ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central Korea Engineering Research Database Health Research Premium Collection (UHCL Subscription) Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central Student SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest Computer Science Collection Computer Science Database ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace ProQuest Biological Science Collection Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional Computing Database Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition) Medical Database Biological Science Database Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic (New) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Academic (retired) ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central Basic MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Open Access Full Text |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef Publicly Available Content Database Computer Science Database ProQuest Central Student ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Computer Science Collection Computer and Information Systems Abstracts SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Sustainability Health Research Premium Collection Natural Science Collection Health & Medical Research Collection Biological Science Collection ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection ProQuest Biological Science Collection ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Hospital Collection ProQuest Technology Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) Biological Science Database ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Engineering Research Database ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) Technology Collection Technology Research Database Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest Natural Science Collection ProQuest Pharma Collection ProQuest Central ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection Biotechnology Research Abstracts Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace ProQuest Computing ProQuest Central Basic ProQuest Computing (Alumni Edition) ProQuest SciTech Collection Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | Publicly Available Content Database MEDLINE - Academic |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: PIMPY name: Publicly Available Content Database url: http://search.proquest.com/publiccontent sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Biology |
| EISSN | 1471-2105 |
| EndPage | 15 |
| ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_48488cd6dac8446990ad9680a93d0264 PMC8236165 A672268187 10_1186_s12859_021_04263_9 |
| GeographicLocations | Netherlands |
| GeographicLocations_xml | – name: Netherlands |
| GroupedDBID | --- 0R~ 23N 2WC 53G 5VS 6J9 7X7 88E 8AO 8FE 8FG 8FH 8FI 8FJ AAFWJ AAJSJ AAKPC AASML ABDBF ABUWG ACGFO ACGFS ACIHN ACIWK ACPRK ACUHS ADBBV ADMLS ADUKV AEAQA AENEX AEUYN AFKRA AFPKN AFRAH AHBYD AHMBA AHYZX ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMKLP AMTXH AOIJS ARAPS AZQEC BAPOH BAWUL BBNVY BCNDV BENPR BFQNJ BGLVJ BHPHI BMC BPHCQ BVXVI C6C CCPQU CS3 DIK DU5 DWQXO E3Z EAD EAP EAS EBD EBLON EBS EMB EMK EMOBN ESX F5P FYUFA GNUQQ GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HCIFZ HMCUK HYE IAO ICD IHR INH INR ISR ITC K6V K7- KQ8 LK8 M1P M48 M7P MK~ ML0 M~E O5R O5S OK1 OVT P2P P62 PGMZT PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PPXIY PQGLB PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO PUEGO RBZ RNS ROL RPM RSV SBL SOJ SV3 TR2 TUS UKHRP W2D WOQ WOW XH6 XSB AAYXX AFFHD CITATION 3V. 7QO 7SC 7XB 8AL 8FD 8FK FR3 JQ2 K9. L7M L~C L~D M0N P64 PKEHL PQEST PQUKI Q9U 7X8 5PM |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c618t-b4581d32e9c46d600cd0b62164748c01b04f3e72d6cdd98399b59cc8c935ff073 |
| IEDL.DBID | RSV |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 17 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000668579600002&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 1471-2105 |
| IngestDate | Tue Oct 14 19:08:28 EDT 2025 Tue Nov 04 02:03:01 EST 2025 Sun Nov 09 14:41:33 EST 2025 Mon Oct 06 18:38:23 EDT 2025 Tue Nov 11 10:28:24 EST 2025 Tue Nov 04 17:54:46 EST 2025 Thu Nov 13 14:37:56 EST 2025 Sat Nov 29 05:40:10 EST 2025 Tue Nov 18 22:37:42 EST 2025 Sat Sep 06 07:27:37 EDT 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 1 |
| Keywords | RNA-sequencing Computational performance Alternative splicing |
| Language | English |
| License | Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c618t-b4581d32e9c46d600cd0b62164748c01b04f3e72d6cdd98399b59cc8c935ff073 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
| ORCID | 0000-0001-9150-8026 |
| OpenAccessLink | https://link.springer.com/10.1186/s12859-021-04263-9 |
| PMID | 34174808 |
| PQID | 2552805625 |
| PQPubID | 44065 |
| PageCount | 15 |
| ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_48488cd6dac8446990ad9680a93d0264 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8236165 proquest_miscellaneous_2545992145 proquest_journals_2552805625 gale_infotracmisc_A672268187 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A672268187 gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A672268187 crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_s12859_021_04263_9 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12859_021_04263_9 springer_journals_10_1186_s12859_021_04263_9 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2021-06-26 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2021-06-26 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 06 year: 2021 text: 2021-06-26 day: 26 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | London |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: London |
| PublicationTitle | BMC bioinformatics |
| PublicationTitleAbbrev | BMC Bioinformatics |
| PublicationYear | 2021 |
| Publisher | BioMed Central BioMed Central Ltd Springer Nature B.V BMC |
| Publisher_xml | – name: BioMed Central – name: BioMed Central Ltd – name: Springer Nature B.V – name: BMC |
| References | 4263_CR32 4263_CR31 M Stark (4263_CR30) 2009; 113 A Wojtuszkiewicz (4263_CR27) 2015; 8 ET Wang (4263_CR2) 2008; 456 4263_CR18 S Shen (4263_CR19) 2014; 111 A Dobin (4263_CR35) 2013; 29 KQ Le (4263_CR10) 2015; 36 JL Trincado (4263_CR21) 2018; 19 R Liu (4263_CR17) 2014; 15 T Griebel (4263_CR34) 2012; 40 GP Alamancos (4263_CR15) 2014; 1126 A Wojtuszkiewicz (4263_CR13) 2016; 101 Y Katz (4263_CR20) 2010; 7 M Pertea (4263_CR33) 2015; 33 L Ding (4263_CR16) 2017; 18 Y Wang (4263_CR4) 2015; 3 FE Baralle (4263_CR5) 2017; 18 JJ McGuire (4263_CR26) 1995; 7 4263_CR25 Q Pan (4263_CR6) 2008; 40 DD Licatalosi (4263_CR1) 2010; 11 4263_CR28 4263_CR8 IB Muller (4263_CR14) 2021; 60 A Wojtuszkiewicz (4263_CR12) 2015; 11 R Sciarrillo (4263_CR9) 2020; 12 NL Bray (4263_CR24) 2016; 34 D Baralle (4263_CR3) 2017; 131 A Wojtuszkiewicz (4263_CR22) 2016; 138 Y Lee (4263_CR7) 2015; 84 R Sciarrillo (4263_CR11) 2019; 39 R Patro (4263_CR23) 2017; 14 DE McCloskey (4263_CR29) 1991; 266 |
| References_xml | – volume: 266 start-page: 6181 issue: 10 year: 1991 ident: 4263_CR29 publication-title: J Biol Chem doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)38101-8 – ident: 4263_CR31 doi: 10.3791/54714 – ident: 4263_CR25 – volume: 84 start-page: 291 year: 2015 ident: 4263_CR7 publication-title: Annu Rev Biochem doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060614-034316 – ident: 4263_CR32 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170 – ident: 4263_CR8 doi: 10.3390/cancers10110458 – volume: 15 start-page: 364 year: 2014 ident: 4263_CR17 publication-title: BMC Bioinformatics doi: 10.1186/s12859-014-0364-4 – volume: 33 start-page: 290 issue: 3 year: 2015 ident: 4263_CR33 publication-title: Nat Biotechnol doi: 10.1038/nbt.3122 – volume: 14 start-page: 417 issue: 4 year: 2017 ident: 4263_CR23 publication-title: Nat Methods doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4197 – volume: 7 start-page: 535 issue: 10–11 year: 1995 ident: 4263_CR26 publication-title: Oncol Res – volume: 131 start-page: 355 issue: 5 year: 2017 ident: 4263_CR3 publication-title: Clin Sci (Lond) doi: 10.1042/CS20160211 – volume: 3 start-page: 152 issue: 2 year: 2015 ident: 4263_CR4 publication-title: Biomed Rep doi: 10.3892/br.2014.407 – volume: 111 start-page: E5593 issue: 51 year: 2014 ident: 4263_CR19 publication-title: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A doi: 10.1073/pnas.1419161111 – ident: 4263_CR28 doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)70697-8 – volume: 18 start-page: 437 issue: 7 year: 2017 ident: 4263_CR5 publication-title: Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol doi: 10.1038/nrm.2017.27 – ident: 4263_CR18 doi: 10.1093/bib/bbz126 – volume: 34 start-page: 525 issue: 5 year: 2016 ident: 4263_CR24 publication-title: Nat Biotechnol doi: 10.1038/nbt.3519 – volume: 456 start-page: 470 issue: 7221 year: 2008 ident: 4263_CR2 publication-title: Nature doi: 10.1038/nature07509 – volume: 113 start-page: 4362 issue: 18 year: 2009 ident: 4263_CR30 publication-title: Blood doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-08-173799 – volume: 19 start-page: 40 issue: 1 year: 2018 ident: 4263_CR21 publication-title: Genome Biol doi: 10.1186/s13059-018-1417-1 – volume: 60 start-page: 1273 issue: 3 year: 2021 ident: 4263_CR14 publication-title: Rheumatology (Oxford) doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaa428 – volume: 12 start-page: 723 issue: 3 year: 2020 ident: 4263_CR9 publication-title: Cancers doi: 10.3390/cancers12030723 – volume: 8 start-page: 61 year: 2015 ident: 4263_CR27 publication-title: J Hematol Oncol doi: 10.1186/s13045-015-0158-9 – volume: 1126 start-page: 357 year: 2014 ident: 4263_CR15 publication-title: Methods Mol Biol doi: 10.1007/978-1-62703-980-2_26 – volume: 11 start-page: 673 issue: 5 year: 2015 ident: 4263_CR12 publication-title: Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol doi: 10.1517/17425255.2015.993316 – volume: 138 start-page: 1645 issue: 7 year: 2016 ident: 4263_CR22 publication-title: Int J Cancer doi: 10.1002/ijc.29919 – volume: 11 start-page: 75 issue: 1 year: 2010 ident: 4263_CR1 publication-title: Nat Rev Genet doi: 10.1038/nrg2673 – volume: 18 start-page: 268 issue: 3 year: 2017 ident: 4263_CR16 publication-title: Curr Genomics doi: 10.2174/1389202918666170215125048 – volume: 39 start-page: 215 year: 2019 ident: 4263_CR11 publication-title: EBioMedicine doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.12.025 – volume: 101 start-page: e291 issue: 7 year: 2016 ident: 4263_CR13 publication-title: Haematologica doi: 10.3324/haematol.2016.142794 – volume: 7 start-page: 1009 issue: 12 year: 2010 ident: 4263_CR20 publication-title: Nat Methods doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1528 – volume: 29 start-page: 15 issue: 1 year: 2013 ident: 4263_CR35 publication-title: Bioinformatics doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635 – volume: 40 start-page: 1413 issue: 12 year: 2008 ident: 4263_CR6 publication-title: Nat Genet doi: 10.1038/ng.259 – volume: 36 start-page: 1212 issue: 10 year: 2015 ident: 4263_CR10 publication-title: Acta Pharmacol Sin doi: 10.1038/aps.2015.43 – volume: 40 start-page: 10073 issue: 20 year: 2012 ident: 4263_CR34 publication-title: Nucleic Acids Res doi: 10.1093/nar/gks666 |
| SSID | ssj0017805 |
| Score | 2.4436932 |
| Snippet | Background
Computational tools analyzing RNA-sequencing data have boosted alternative splicing research by identifying and assessing differentially spliced... Computational tools analyzing RNA-sequencing data have boosted alternative splicing research by identifying and assessing differentially spliced genes.... Background Computational tools analyzing RNA-sequencing data have boosted alternative splicing research by identifying and assessing differentially spliced... Abstract Background Computational tools analyzing RNA-sequencing data have boosted alternative splicing research by identifying and assessing differentially... |
| SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest gale crossref springer |
| SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Enrichment Source Index Database Publisher |
| StartPage | 1 |
| SubjectTerms | Algorithms Alternative splicing Analysis Bioinformatics Biomedical and Life Sciences Comparative analysis Computational biology Computational Biology/Bioinformatics Computational performance Computer Appl. in Life Sciences Computer applications Correlation coefficient Correlation coefficients Drug resistance Gene expression Gene sequencing Life Sciences Methods Microarrays Research Article Ribonucleic acid RNA RNA splicing RNA-sequencing Sequence analysis Software Splicing Statistical analysis Utilization Virtual environments |
| SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ Open Access Full Text dbid: DOA link: http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3di9QwEB_kUPBF_MTqKVEEHzRcP9PEt1M8FOQQv7i3kE5aPVha2e4K9-S_7kyartZDffFxN5PNdmaS_KaZ_AbgUUcoHFuDksCwkiWmrTR1VspOVbRcYqV9INP59KY-PtYnJ-btL6W-OCdsogeeFHdQanIx9Mo71BS60OLpvFE6dabwFD8EJtC0NnMwFc8PmKl_viKj1cGYMU-b5HQEjhkKaRbbUGDrP78mn8-T_O2wNOxBR1fhSgSP4nD609fgQttfh0tTOcmzG_B9KtEQX-8J3JUYFEPHn8jjRCBskrx3eTEXR6FJvhIjH2TTqGIzDKvxmYjXp8LvTDU9p3d7glCuiK4zrM9EZAtiGHkTPh69_PDilYwFFiSqTNNgZUVwtcjJVqXyBH3Qp43KmWKs1JhmTVp2RVvnXqH3hqCUaSqDqNEUVdfR4nAL9vqhb2-D6BrtmBzMOcN8P7ppvGkY7OVtVtWNSyCb9W0xso9zEYyVDVGIVnaykSUb2WAjaxJ4suvzdeLe-Kv0czbjTpJ5s8MX5E02epP9lzcl8JCdwDIzRs-pN5_ddhzt6_fv7KGqCaoSvqkTeByFuoGeAV28yUCaYDKtheT-QpKmLi6bZ1-zcekYLcV4uWZYWiXwYNfMPTkdrm-HLcuUlTFMMp9AvfDRxeMvW_rTL4E-nEvcZ4p6Pp29-efgf1bvnf-h3rtwOQ-TUMlc7cPeZr1t78FF_LY5Hdf3wxT-AXZvSWM priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – databaseName: Biological Science Database dbid: M7P link: http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Lb9QwEB5BAYkLb0SgIIOQOIDVPB2bCyqICiRUVbzUm5WMk1JplZTNLlJP_HVmHGerUNELx8TjJM6Mx5_t8TcAz1tC4dgYlASGlcwxbqQpk1y2qiB3iYV2nkzn-6dyf18fHpqDsOA2hLDKySd6R-165DXyHYK-qebRunhz8lNy1ijeXQ0pNC7DFWZJSH3o3sFmF4H5-qeDMlrtDAmztUkOSuCZQybNbDDynP3nPfP5aMm_tkz9SLR383_bcAtuBAwqdkejuQ2Xmu4OXBuzUp7ehd9jpoewSihwk6lQ9C1f0VOE532SPAQ6MeVYIV-xEAPvh9Nni1XfL4bXIpzC8s8ZU4OOS4SCwLIIFtgvT0UgHWI0eg--7b3_-u6DDHkaJKpE08vyglBvlpLKc-UIQaGLa5UyU1muMU7qOG-zpkydQucMITJTFwZRo8mKtiUfcx-2ur5rHoBoa10xx1hVGaYN0nXtTM2YMW2SoqyrCJJJYRYDiTnn0lhYP5nRyo5KtqRk65VsTQQvN3VORgqPC6Xfsh1sJJl-29_ol0c29Gaba_J76JSrUNN8mkb0yhml48pkjia1eQTP2IosE2x0HMFzVK2HwX788tnuqpIQL8GkMoIXQajtqQ1YhQMR9CeYk2smuT2TJA-A8-LJ3GzwQIM9s7UInm6KuSZH1XVNv2aZvDCGueojKGdGPmv-vKQ7_uFZyDXT9iiq-WrqDmcv__fvfXjxtz6C66nvn0qmahu2Vst18xiu4q_V8bB84nv3H0FEWE0 priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest |
| Title | Computational comparison of common event-based differential splicing tools: practical considerations for laboratory researchers |
| URI | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12859-021-04263-9 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2552805625 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2545992145 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC8236165 https://doaj.org/article/48488cd6dac8446990ad9680a93d0264 |
| Volume | 22 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos000668579600002&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVADU databaseName: Open Access: BioMedCentral Open Access Titles customDbUrl: eissn: 1471-2105 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0017805 issn: 1471-2105 databaseCode: RBZ dateStart: 20000101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.biomedcentral.com/search/ providerName: BioMedCentral – providerCode: PRVAON databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals customDbUrl: eissn: 1471-2105 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0017805 issn: 1471-2105 databaseCode: DOA dateStart: 20000101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.doaj.org/ providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – providerCode: PRVHPJ databaseName: ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources customDbUrl: eissn: 1471-2105 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0017805 issn: 1471-2105 databaseCode: M~E dateStart: 20000101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://road.issn.org providerName: ISSN International Centre – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database customDbUrl: eissn: 1471-2105 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0017805 issn: 1471-2105 databaseCode: P5Z dateStart: 20090101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/hightechjournals providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Biological Science Database customDbUrl: eissn: 1471-2105 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0017805 issn: 1471-2105 databaseCode: M7P dateStart: 20090101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://search.proquest.com/biologicalscijournals providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Computer Science Database customDbUrl: eissn: 1471-2105 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0017805 issn: 1471-2105 databaseCode: K7- dateStart: 20090101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://search.proquest.com/compscijour providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Health & Medical Collection customDbUrl: eissn: 1471-2105 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0017805 issn: 1471-2105 databaseCode: 7X7 dateStart: 20090101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/healthcomplete providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: ProQuest Central customDbUrl: eissn: 1471-2105 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0017805 issn: 1471-2105 databaseCode: BENPR dateStart: 20090101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.proquest.com/central providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Publicly Available Content Database customDbUrl: eissn: 1471-2105 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0017805 issn: 1471-2105 databaseCode: PIMPY dateStart: 20090101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://search.proquest.com/publiccontent providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVAVX databaseName: SpringerLink customDbUrl: eissn: 1471-2105 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0017805 issn: 1471-2105 databaseCode: RSV dateStart: 20001201 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://link.springer.com/search?facet-content-type=%22Journal%22 providerName: Springer Nature |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwEB7RFiQuvBGBsjIIiQNY3WQTx-bWolZUwCraQrVwsRI7KZVWCdrsIvXEX2fGcRaFAhJcLCUe52GPx5_t8TcAzypE4aZUhiMYFjw245KrNIx5JRI0lyaR1pHpnL5Lp1M5n6vMHwpre2_3fkvSWWrXraXYa0PiWuPkUkC4f8LVFuzgcCcpYMPs5HSzd0As_f3xmN-WGwxBjqn_sj2-7CP5y0apG3-Obv7fl9-CGx5vsv1OQW7DlbK-A9e6CJQXd-F7F9XBrwgys4lKyJqKrlBJmeN44jTcWdbHU0G7sGAt7X3jh7BV0yzaV8yfuHLP6cKAdsuBDIEx89rWLC-YJxgi5HkPPh4dfnj9hvuYDNyIUOLL4gQR7iTC5o2FRbRk7LgQEbGSxdKMw2IcV5Myjaww1ipEX6pIlDHSqElSVWhP7sN23dTlA2BVIXPiE8tzRRRBsiisKggfRmWYpEUeQNg3kzaesJziZiy0m7hIobuK1Vix2lWsVgG82JT52tF1_FX6gFp_I0lU2-5GszzTvufqWKKNM1bY3EicO-PonVsl5DhXE4sT2DiAp6Q7msg0avLWOcvXbauPT2Z6X6SIbhESpQE890JVg_9gcn_4AWuC-LcGkrsDSeztZpjdq6j21qbVOC2MJCHZJIAnm2wqSR50ddmsSSZOlCJe-gDSgWoPfn-YU59_cYzjkih6BJZ82Sv4z5f_uXof_pv4I7geuT4ieCR2YXu1XJeP4ar5tjpvlyPYSuepS-UIdg4Op9ls5BZQMH2b8hE57WaYZslnzM-O32efRs4u_AD14FdT |
| linkProvider | Springer Nature |
| linkToHtml | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMw1V1bb9MwFLbGAMELd0RggEEgHsBakziOjYTQuEyrWioEG9qbSexkTKqS0bSgPvGP-I2c4zidwsTe9sBj6uPEds_l8-07hDwpAYWbQhkGYFgwbgYFU2nIWSkScJcmkdaR6XwZp5OJ3N9XH9fI7-4uDB6r7Hyic9S2NrhGvgnQN5IYrZPXR98ZZo3C3dUuhUarFqNi-ROmbM2r4Tv4f59G0fb73bc7zGcVYEaEcs5yngBGiyNoIBcW4r2xg1xEyKvFpRmE-YCXcZFGVhhrFeAHlSfKGGlUnJQlWAS89xw5z2OZol2NUrbatcD8AN3FHCk2mxDZ4RgegsCZSsxUL_i5HAEnI8HJ05l_bdG6yLd99X8bs2vkisfYdKs1iutkrahukItt1s3lTfKrzWThV0GpWWVipHWJT9Bq6nitGIZ4S7scMuALp7TB_X4YJjqv62nzkvpbZu49berTdgmUwmSAegurZ0vqSZUQbd8ie2fS-9tkvaqr4g6hZS4z5FDLMoW0SDLPrcoRE0dFmKR5FpCwUxBtPEk75gqZajdZk0K3SqVBqbRTKq0C8nxV56ilKDlV-g3q3UoS6cXdD_XsQHtvpbkEv26ssJmRnAtALJlVQg4yFVuYtPOAPEat1UggUuEJpYNs0TR6-PmT3hIpIHqAgWlAnnmhsoY-mMxf-ICRQM6xnuRGTxI8nOkXd-qtvYdt9LFuB-TRqhhr4qnBqqgXKMMTpZCLPyBpz6h63e-XVIffHMu6RFoiATVfdOZ3_PF_D-_d09v6kFza2f0w1uPhZHSPXI6cbxAsEhtkfT5bFPfJBfNjftjMHjjPQsnXszbLP7jus7o |
| linkToPdf | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Lb9QwEB5BeYgLb0SggEFIHKjVPB2bW3msqKhWFYWqNyuxk1JplVSbXaSe-OvMOE4gFJAQx6zHyXoyHn8Tj78BeF4jCjeVMhzBsOCpCSuu8ijltcjQXZpMWkemc7iXz-fy6Ejt_3SK32W7D1uS_ZkGYmlqVtuntu6nuBTbXUS8a5zSCygGSLi6CJdSSqSneP3gcNxHIMb-4ajMb_tNliPH2n_eN5_Pl_xl09StRbMb_z-Km3Dd41C20xvOLbhQNbfhSl-Z8uwOfOurPfgvhcyM1QpZW9MVGi9z3E-clkHLhjor6C8WrKM9cfxTbNW2i-4V8yex3H368qD9Z0KGgJl5K2yXZ8wTDxEivQufZ-8-vXnPfa0GbkQk8WFphsg3ifG1p8IiijI2LEVMbGWpNGFUhmmdVHlshbFWISpTZaaMkUYlWV2jn7kHG03bVPeB1aUsiGesKBRRB8mytKok3BhXUZaXRQDR8Mq08UTmVE9joV1AI4XuFatRsdopVqsAXo59Tnsaj79KvyZLGCWJgtv90C6PtZ_ROpXo-4wVtjASY2pc1QurhAwLlVgMbNMAnpEdaSLZaCiL57hYd53ePfiod0SOqBehUh7ACy9UtzgGU_hDEagJ4uWaSG5OJNELmGnzYK7ae6FOY7gYS0K4WQBPx2bqSZl1TdWuSSbNlCK--gDyiZlPhj9taU6-OCZySdQ9AntuDcb-4-F_Vu-DfxN_Alf338703u78w0O4FrvpIngsNmFjtVxXj-Cy-bo66ZaP3dT_DrIEWkY |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Computational+comparison+of+common+event-based+differential+splicing+tools%3A+practical+considerations+for+laboratory+researchers&rft.jtitle=BMC+bioinformatics&rft.au=Muller%2C+Ittai+B&rft.au=Meijers%2C+Stijn&rft.au=Kampstra%2C+Peter&rft.au=van+Dijk%2C+Steven&rft.date=2021-06-26&rft.pub=BioMed+Central+Ltd&rft.issn=1471-2105&rft.eissn=1471-2105&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=1&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12859-021-04263-9&rft.externalDBID=ISR&rft.externalDocID=A672268187 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1471-2105&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1471-2105&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1471-2105&client=summon |