Genetic variation and differentiation in captive and wild zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata)
The zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata) is a small Australian grassland songbird that has been domesticated over the past two centuries. Because it is easy to breed in captivity, it has become a widely used study organism, especially in behavioural research. Most work has been conducted on domesticate...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Molecular ecology Jg. 16; H. 19; S. 4039 - 4050 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Oxford, UK
Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.10.2007
Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
| Schlagworte: | |
| ISSN: | 0962-1083, 1365-294X |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| Abstract | The zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata) is a small Australian grassland songbird that has been domesticated over the past two centuries. Because it is easy to breed in captivity, it has become a widely used study organism, especially in behavioural research. Most work has been conducted on domesticated populations maintained at numerous laboratories in Europe and North America. However, little is known about the extent to which, during the process of domestication, captive populations have gone through bottlenecks in population size, leading to inbred and potentially genetically differentiated study populations. This is an important issue, because (i) behavioural studies on captive populations might suffer from artefacts arising from high levels of inbreeding or lack of genetic variation in such populations, and (ii) it may hamper the comparability of research findings. To address this issue, we genotyped 1000 zebra finches from 18 captive and two wild populations at 10 highly variable microsatellite loci. We found that all captive populations have lost some of the genetic variability present in the wild, but there is no evidence that they have gone through a severe bottleneck, as the average captive population still showed a mean of 11.7 alleles per locus, compared to a mean of 19.3 alleles/locus for wild zebra finches. We found significant differentiation between the captive populations (FST = 0.062). Patterns of genetic similarity closely match geographical relationships, so the most pronounced differences occur between the three continents: Australia, North America, and Europe. By providing a tree of the genetic similarity of the different captive populations, we hope to contribute to a better understanding of variation in research findings obtained by different laboratories. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | The zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata) is a small Australian grassland songbird that has been domesticated over the past two centuries. Because it is easy to breed in captivity, it has become a widely used study organism, especially in behavioural research. Most work has been conducted on domesticated populations maintained at numerous laboratories in Europe and North America. However, little is known about the extent to which, during the process of domestication, captive populations have gone through bottlenecks in population size, leading to inbred and potentially genetically differentiated study populations. This is an important issue, because (i) behavioural studies on captive populations might suffer from artefacts arising from high levels of inbreeding or lack of genetic variation in such populations, and (ii) it may hamper the comparability of research findings. To address this issue, we genotyped 1000 zebra finches from 18 captive and two wild populations at 10 highly variable microsatellite loci. We found that all captive populations have lost some of the genetic variability present in the wild, but there is no evidence that they have gone through a severe bottleneck, as the average captive population still showed a mean of 11.7 alleles per locus, compared to a mean of 19.3 alleles/locus for wild zebra finches. We found significant differentiation between the captive populations (F ST = 0.062). Patterns of genetic similarity closely match geographical relationships, so the most pronounced differences occur between the three continents: Australia, North America, and Europe. By providing a tree of the genetic similarity of the different captive populations, we hope to contribute to a better understanding of variation in research findings obtained by different laboratories. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] The zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata) is a small Australian grassland songbird that has been domesticated over the past two centuries. Because it is easy to breed in captivity, it has become a widely used study organism, especially in behavioural research. Most work has been conducted on domesticated populations maintained at numerous laboratories in Europe and North America. However, little is known about the extent to which, during the process of domestication, captive populations have gone through bottlenecks in population size, leading to inbred and potentially genetically differentiated study populations. This is an important issue, because (i) behavioural studies on captive populations might suffer from artefacts arising from high levels of inbreeding or lack of genetic variation in such populations, and (ii) it may hamper the comparability of research findings. To address this issue, we genotyped 1000 zebra finches from 18 captive and two wild populations at 10 highly variable microsatellite loci. We found that all captive populations have lost some of the genetic variability present in the wild, but there is no evidence that they have gone through a severe bottleneck, as the average captive population still showed a mean of 11.7 alleles per locus, compared to a mean of 19.3 alleles/locus for wild zebra finches. We found significant differentiation between the captive populations (FST = 0.062). Patterns of genetic similarity closely match geographical relationships, so the most pronounced differences occur between the three continents: Australia, North America, and Europe. By providing a tree of the genetic similarity of the different captive populations, we hope to contribute to a better understanding of variation in research findings obtained by different laboratories. The zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata) is a small Australian grassland songbird that has been domesticated over the past two centuries. Because it is easy to breed in captivity, it has become a widely used study organism, especially in behavioural research. Most work has been conducted on domesticated populations maintained at numerous laboratories in Europe and North America. However, little is known about the extent to which, during the process of domestication, captive populations have gone through bottlenecks in population size, leading to inbred and potentially genetically differentiated study populations. This is an important issue, because (i) behavioural studies on captive populations might suffer from artefacts arising from high levels of inbreeding or lack of genetic variation in such populations, and (ii) it may hamper the comparability of research findings. To address this issue, we genotyped 1000 zebra finches from 18 captive and two wild populations at 10 highly variable microsatellite loci. We found that all captive populations have lost some of the genetic variability present in the wild, but there is no evidence that they have gone through a severe bottleneck, as the average captive population still showed a mean of 11.7 alleles per locus, compared to a mean of 19.3 alleles/locus for wild zebra finches. We found significant differentiation between the captive populations (F(ST) = 0.062). Patterns of genetic similarity closely match geographical relationships, so the most pronounced differences occur between the three continents: Australia, North America, and Europe. By providing a tree of the genetic similarity of the different captive populations, we hope to contribute to a better understanding of variation in research findings obtained by different laboratories. The zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata) is a small Australian grassland songbird that has been domesticated over the past two centuries. Because it is easy to breed in captivity, it has become a widely used study organism, especially in behavioural research. Most work has been conducted on domesticated populations maintained at numerous laboratories in Europe and North America. However, little is known about the extent to which, during the process of domestication, captive populations have gone through bottlenecks in population size, leading to inbred and potentially genetically differentiated study populations. This is an important issue, because (i) behavioural studies on captive populations might suffer from artefacts arising from high levels of inbreeding or lack of genetic variation in such populations, and (ii) it may hamper the comparability of research findings. To address this issue, we genotyped 1000 zebra finches from 18 captive and two wild populations at 10 highly variable microsatellite loci. We found that all captive populations have lost some of the genetic variability present in the wild, but there is no evidence that they have gone through a severe bottleneck, as the average captive population still showed a mean of 11.7 alleles per locus, compared to a mean of 19.3 alleles/locus for wild zebra finches. We found significant differentiation between the captive populations (F sub(ST) = 0.062) . Patterns of genetic similarity closely match geographical relationships, so the most pronounced differences occur between the three continents: Australia, North America, and Europe. By providing a tree of the genetic similarity of the different captive populations, we hope to contribute to a better understanding of variation in research findings obtained by different laboratories. The zebra finch ( Taeniopygia guttata ) is a small Australian grassland songbird that has been domesticated over the past two centuries. Because it is easy to breed in captivity, it has become a widely used study organism, especially in behavioural research. Most work has been conducted on domesticated populations maintained at numerous laboratories in Europe and North America. However, little is known about the extent to which, during the process of domestication, captive populations have gone through bottlenecks in population size, leading to inbred and potentially genetically differentiated study populations. This is an important issue, because (i) behavioural studies on captive populations might suffer from artefacts arising from high levels of inbreeding or lack of genetic variation in such populations, and (ii) it may hamper the comparability of research findings. To address this issue, we genotyped 1000 zebra finches from 18 captive and two wild populations at 10 highly variable microsatellite loci. We found that all captive populations have lost some of the genetic variability present in the wild, but there is no evidence that they have gone through a severe bottleneck, as the average captive population still showed a mean of 11.7 alleles per locus, compared to a mean of 19.3 alleles/locus for wild zebra finches. We found significant differentiation between the captive populations ( F ST = 0.062). Patterns of genetic similarity closely match geographical relationships, so the most pronounced differences occur between the three continents: Australia, North America, and Europe. By providing a tree of the genetic similarity of the different captive populations, we hope to contribute to a better understanding of variation in research findings obtained by different laboratories. The zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata) is a small Australian grassland songbird that has been domesticated over the past two centuries. Because it is easy to breed in captivity, it has become a widely used study organism, especially in behavioural research. Most work has been conducted on domesticated populations maintained at numerous laboratories in Europe and North America. However, little is known about the extent to which, during the process of domestication, captive populations have gone through bottlenecks in population size, leading to inbred and potentially genetically differentiated study populations. This is an important issue, because (i) behavioural studies on captive populations might suffer from artefacts arising from high levels of inbreeding or lack of genetic variation in such populations, and (ii) it may hamper the comparability of research findings. To address this issue, we genotyped 1000 zebra finches from 18 captive and two wild populations at 10 highly variable microsatellite loci. We found that all captive populations have lost some of the genetic variability present in the wild, but there is no evidence that they have gone through a severe bottleneck, as the average captive population still showed a mean of 11.7 alleles per locus, compared to a mean of 19.3 alleles/locus for wild zebra finches. We found significant differentiation between the captive populations (FST = 0.062). Patterns of genetic similarity closely match geographical relationships, so the most pronounced differences occur between the three continents: Australia, North America, and Europe. By providing a tree of the genetic similarity of the different captive populations, we hope to contribute to a better understanding of variation in research findings obtained by different laboratories. The zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata) is a small Australian grassland songbird that has been domesticated over the past two centuries. Because it is easy to breed in captivity, it has become a widely used study organism, especially in behavioural research. Most work has been conducted on domesticated populations maintained at numerous laboratories in Europe and North America. However, little is known about the extent to which, during the process of domestication, captive populations have gone through bottlenecks in population size, leading to inbred and potentially genetically differentiated study populations. This is an important issue, because (i) behavioural studies on captive populations might suffer from artefacts arising from high levels of inbreeding or lack of genetic variation in such populations, and (ii) it may hamper the comparability of research findings. To address this issue, we genotyped 1000 zebra finches from 18 captive and two wild populations at 10 highly variable microsatellite loci. We found that all captive populations have lost some of the genetic variability present in the wild, but there is no evidence that they have gone through a severe bottleneck, as the average captive population still showed a mean of 11.7 alleles per locus, compared to a mean of 19.3 alleles/locus for wild zebra finches. We found significant differentiation between the captive populations (F(ST) = 0.062). Patterns of genetic similarity closely match geographical relationships, so the most pronounced differences occur between the three continents: Australia, North America, and Europe. By providing a tree of the genetic similarity of the different captive populations, we hope to contribute to a better understanding of variation in research findings obtained by different laboratories.The zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata) is a small Australian grassland songbird that has been domesticated over the past two centuries. Because it is easy to breed in captivity, it has become a widely used study organism, especially in behavioural research. Most work has been conducted on domesticated populations maintained at numerous laboratories in Europe and North America. However, little is known about the extent to which, during the process of domestication, captive populations have gone through bottlenecks in population size, leading to inbred and potentially genetically differentiated study populations. This is an important issue, because (i) behavioural studies on captive populations might suffer from artefacts arising from high levels of inbreeding or lack of genetic variation in such populations, and (ii) it may hamper the comparability of research findings. To address this issue, we genotyped 1000 zebra finches from 18 captive and two wild populations at 10 highly variable microsatellite loci. We found that all captive populations have lost some of the genetic variability present in the wild, but there is no evidence that they have gone through a severe bottleneck, as the average captive population still showed a mean of 11.7 alleles per locus, compared to a mean of 19.3 alleles/locus for wild zebra finches. We found significant differentiation between the captive populations (F(ST) = 0.062). Patterns of genetic similarity closely match geographical relationships, so the most pronounced differences occur between the three continents: Australia, North America, and Europe. By providing a tree of the genetic similarity of the different captive populations, we hope to contribute to a better understanding of variation in research findings obtained by different laboratories. |
| Author | SEGELBACHER, GERNOT KEMPENAERS, BART MUELLER, JAKOB C. FORSTMEIER, WOLFGANG |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 fullname: FORSTMEIER, WOLFGANG – sequence: 2 fullname: SEGELBACHER, GERNOT – sequence: 3 fullname: MUELLER, JAKOB C – sequence: 4 fullname: KEMPENAERS, BART |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17894758$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNqNkk1vEzEQhi1URNPCX4AVB1QOG_y1tvcAEoragFqKEKnggiyv1xucJt7UdkrCr8ebDTn0QPBlrJnnnbE87wk4cq0zAGQIDlE6b2ZDRFiR45J-H2II-RASSulw_QgM9oUjMIAlwzmCghyDkxBmECKCi-IJOEZclJQXYgB-jI0z0ersXnmrom1dplyd1bZpjDcu7nLWZVoto7032_IvO6-z36byKmus0z9NyM4myjjbLjdTq7LpKkYV1eun4HGj5sE828VTcHNxPhl9yK8-jz-O3l_lmiFOc0NKpTlnJTWa1w2tFW-0aRSqdFlpWJdcFUUDa4yrlCsQVpAIpBkhpsKEa3IKXvV9l769W5kQ5cIGbeZz5Uy7CpIJgjhm7CBIOS0YF-IgiGEBKWcdePZPEIkSCU4FRwl9-QCdtSvv0sdIjCBHDIvuhc930KpamFouvV0ov5F_V5aAdz2gfRuCN43UNm63FL2yc4mg7DwiZ7KzguysIDuPyK1H5Do1EA8a7Gcclr7tpckAZvPfOvnpfNTdkj7v9TZEs97rlb-VjBNeyG_XY3l9OfmCSziRl4l_0fONaqWaehvkzVecbAyhQClQ8gcBgetg |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_anbehav_2021_09_001 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_017_13110_y crossref_primary_10_1007_s00265_017_2382_5 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_anbehav_2017_04_003 crossref_primary_10_1093_beheco_arp185 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_conb_2012_10_001 crossref_primary_10_1111_mec_16963 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pbio_3001257 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13059_016_1056_3 crossref_primary_10_1093_conphys_coac010 crossref_primary_10_1098_rsos_211025 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_anbehav_2013_04_015 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1558_5646_2009_00862_x crossref_primary_10_3389_fevo_2016_00141 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0086519 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_anbehav_2011_10_003 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12862_015_0546_3 crossref_primary_10_3389_fvets_2022_791412 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_anbehav_2011_03_021 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1439_0310_2007_01466_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_anbehav_2010_01_014 crossref_primary_10_1093_conphys_coaa083 crossref_primary_10_3389_fmicb_2021_619141 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1558_5646_2011_01431_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ygcen_2017_07_014 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ygcen_2016_02_018 crossref_primary_10_1093_beheco_arx195 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10164_011_0319_4 crossref_primary_10_1111_mec_14009 crossref_primary_10_1002_ece3_6951 crossref_primary_10_1534_genetics_108_094250 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00412_010_0308_3 crossref_primary_10_3389_fevo_2021_799996 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijms23052518 crossref_primary_10_1111_evo_14026 crossref_primary_10_1071_MUv110n3_ED crossref_primary_10_1111_evo_13905 crossref_primary_10_1111_eth_12576 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00248_017_1130_8 crossref_primary_10_7554_eLife_61849 crossref_primary_10_1111_mec_13020 crossref_primary_10_1098_rsos_240417 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_anbehav_2008_08_014 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ygcen_2013_10_006 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10682_013_9674_7 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_beproc_2014_01_019 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1365_294X_2011_05365_x crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1365_294X_2012_05593_x crossref_primary_10_3390_life15071058 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1471_4159_2011_07274_x crossref_primary_10_1093_beheco_arab107 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_anbehav_2011_12_027 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bse_2014_01_011 crossref_primary_10_1111_evo_13341 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10211_025_00461_3 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1420_9101_2008_01656_x crossref_primary_10_1080_01584197_2020_1859336 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1365_294X_2012_05661_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_yhbeh_2008_01_002 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_020_80466_z crossref_primary_10_1016_j_yhbeh_2020_104747 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pbio_1002248 crossref_primary_10_1098_rstb_2023_0420 crossref_primary_10_1111_jeb_13062 crossref_primary_10_1098_rspb_2018_0865 crossref_primary_10_1111_evo_12261 crossref_primary_10_1073_pnas_2103960119 crossref_primary_10_1101_gr_101410_109 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0167368 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0188582 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0037785 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_beproc_2012_09_006 crossref_primary_10_1002_zoo_21296 crossref_primary_10_1002_cne_24761 crossref_primary_10_1093_beheco_ars142 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_dci_2023_105106 crossref_primary_10_1093_beheco_arx037 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_anbehav_2015_05_019 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2016_00980 crossref_primary_10_1002_dneu_22302 crossref_primary_10_1098_rsos_190273 crossref_primary_10_1093_conphys_coz056 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ygcen_2008_01_007 crossref_primary_10_3390_birds2010004 crossref_primary_10_1074_jbc_M116_714378 crossref_primary_10_1093_beheco_art074 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_anbehav_2014_09_012 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10592_015_0726_0 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1365_294X_2010_04554_x crossref_primary_10_1111_eth_12400 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1439_0418_2010_01593_x crossref_primary_10_1007_s00265_014_1791_y crossref_primary_10_1038_s42003_024_06945_5 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_anbehav_2010_03_018 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41559_017_0236_1 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00216_024_05466_8 crossref_primary_10_1002_etc_5696 crossref_primary_10_1071_MU15088 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1558_5646_2009_00688_x crossref_primary_10_1007_s10336_015_1212_7 crossref_primary_10_1002_ece3_1868 crossref_primary_10_3389_fevo_2023_1000531 crossref_primary_10_1111_eth_12490 crossref_primary_10_1111_eth_12095 crossref_primary_10_3389_fevo_2019_00294 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_isci_2025_112789 crossref_primary_10_1071_MU09091 crossref_primary_10_1071_MU09092 crossref_primary_10_1093_beheco_arq184 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0005015 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1474_919X_2012_01232_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_yhbeh_2024_105508 crossref_primary_10_1111_eth_12810 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_physbeh_2010_04_002 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10646_017_1890_4 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0023974 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1095_8312_2010_01460_x crossref_primary_10_1642_AUK_17_12_1 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2021_654198 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03089.x 10.1006/anbe.1997.0579 10.1098/rspb.2005.3264 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02767.x 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1999.tb04528.x 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1975.tb00807.x 10.1093/bib/6.4.390 10.1006/anbe.1996.0156 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2004.00754.x 10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02489-8 10.1093/genetics/105.3.767 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800545 10.1126/science.155.3760.279 10.1098/rspb.2003.2562 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2000.105338.x 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2004.00714.x 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1987.tb05823.x 10.1093/oso/9780198540793.001.0001 10.1016/S0168-9525(00)02139-9 10.1093/genetics/155.2.945 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02493.x 10.1073/pnas.102583399 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00385.x 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1984.tb05657.x 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a111627 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | 2007 The AuthorsJournal compilation © 2007 Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: 2007 The AuthorsJournal compilation © 2007 Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
| DBID | FBQ BSCLL AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7SN 7SS 8FD C1K FR3 M7N P64 RC3 7ST 7U6 7S9 L.6 7X8 |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03444.x |
| DatabaseName | AGRIS Istex CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Ecology Abstracts Entomology Abstracts (Full archive) Technology Research Database Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management Engineering Research Database Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C) Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Genetics Abstracts Environment Abstracts Sustainability Science Abstracts AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Entomology Abstracts Genetics Abstracts Technology Research Database Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C) Engineering Research Database Ecology Abstracts Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management Sustainability Science Abstracts Environment Abstracts AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | Entomology Abstracts MEDLINE Genetics Abstracts CrossRef Genetics Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic AGRICOLA |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: 7X8 name: MEDLINE - Academic url: https://search.proquest.com/medline sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Biology Ecology |
| EISSN | 1365-294X |
| EndPage | 4050 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 1341817521 17894758 10_1111_j_1365_294X_2007_03444_x MEC3444 ark_67375_WNG_NKTQ290T_K US201300810134 |
| Genre | article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article Comparative Study Feature |
| GeographicLocations | Australia North America Europe |
| GeographicLocations_xml | – name: Europe – name: North America – name: Australia |
| GroupedDBID | --- .3N .GA .Y3 05W 0R~ 10A 123 1OB 1OC 29M 31~ 33P 36B 3SF 4.4 50Y 50Z 51W 51X 52M 52N 52O 52P 52S 52T 52U 52W 52X 53G 5HH 5LA 5VS 66C 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8UM 930 A03 AAESR AAEVG AAHHS AAJUZ AANLZ AAONW AASGY AAXRX AAZKR ABCQN ABCUV ABCVL ABEML ABHUG ABJNI ABPTK ABPVW ACAHQ ACBWZ ACCFJ ACCZN ACGFO ACGFS ACNCT ACPOU ACPRK ACSCC ACXBN ACXME ACXQS ADAWD ADBBV ADDAD ADEOM ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADOZA ADXAS ADZMN AEEZP AEGXH AEIGN AEIMD AENEX AEQDE AETEA AEUQT AEUYR AFBPY AFEBI AFFPM AFGKR AFPWT AFRAH AFVGU AFZJQ AGJLS AHEFC AIAGR AIURR AIWBW AJBDE AJXKR ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN AMBMR AMYDB ASPBG ATUGU AUFTA AVWKF AZBYB AZFZN AZVAB BAFTC BDRZF BFHJK BHBCM BIYOS BMNLL BMXJE BNHUX BROTX BRXPI BY8 CAG COF CS3 D-E D-F DCZOG DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DRSTM DU5 EBS ECGQY EJD ESX F00 F01 F04 F5P FBQ FEDTE FZ0 G-S G.N GODZA H.T H.X HF~ HVGLF HZI HZ~ IHE IX1 J0M K48 LATKE LC2 LC3 LEEKS LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LUTES LW6 LYRES MEWTI MK4 MRFUL MRSTM MSFUL MSSTM MVM MXFUL MXSTM N04 N05 N9A NF~ O66 O9- P2P P2W P2X P4D PALCI PQQKQ Q.N Q11 QB0 R.K RIWAO RJQFR ROL RX1 SAMSI SUPJJ TN5 UB1 V8K W8V W99 WBKPD WH7 WIH WIK WNSPC WOHZO WQJ WRC WXSBR WYISQ XG1 XJT Y6R ZZTAW ~02 ~IA ~KM ~WT AAHBH AAHQN AAMMB AAMNL AANHP AAYCA ACRPL ACYXJ ADNMO AEFGJ AEYWJ AFWVQ AGHNM AGQPQ AGXDD AGYGG AHBTC AIDQK AIDYY AIQQE AITYG ALVPJ BSCLL HGLYW OIG AAYXX CITATION O8X CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7SN 7SS 8FD C1K FR3 M7N P64 RC3 7ST 7U6 7S9 L.6 7X8 |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c6174-e39ac77694ec7df4da7fcefa1bc9bc0d97a55f0d22ba1b512a0381c633eb237c3 |
| IEDL.DBID | DRFUL |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 143 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000249829500007&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 0962-1083 |
| IngestDate | Thu Oct 02 04:16:57 EDT 2025 Fri Sep 05 17:33:06 EDT 2025 Tue Oct 07 10:15:50 EDT 2025 Tue Oct 07 08:08:36 EDT 2025 Mon Nov 10 03:00:52 EST 2025 Mon Jul 21 06:05:00 EDT 2025 Sat Nov 29 02:38:18 EST 2025 Tue Nov 18 21:53:01 EST 2025 Sun Sep 21 06:16:24 EDT 2025 Tue Nov 11 03:33:15 EST 2025 Wed Dec 27 19:31:43 EST 2023 |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 19 |
| Language | English |
| License | http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c6174-e39ac77694ec7df4da7fcefa1bc9bc0d97a55f0d22ba1b512a0381c633eb237c3 |
| Notes | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03444.x ArticleID:MEC3444 istex:5A8898E5E46B4F02CAD42A260AFB69E2CBA30209 ark:/67375/WNG-NKTQ290T-K SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-2 |
| PMID | 17894758 |
| PQID | 210716286 |
| PQPubID | 23462 |
| PageCount | 12 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_68317266 proquest_miscellaneous_47456788 proquest_miscellaneous_20504768 proquest_miscellaneous_1891874871 proquest_journals_210716286 pubmed_primary_17894758 crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_j_1365_294X_2007_03444_x crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1365_294X_2007_03444_x wiley_primary_10_1111_j_1365_294X_2007_03444_x_MEC3444 istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_NKTQ290T_K fao_agris_US201300810134 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | October 2007 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2007-10-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 10 year: 2007 text: October 2007 |
| PublicationDecade | 2000 |
| PublicationPlace | Oxford, UK |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Oxford, UK – name: England – name: Oxford |
| PublicationTitle | Molecular ecology |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Mol Ecol |
| PublicationYear | 2007 |
| Publisher | Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd – name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
| References | Ji YJ, Liu YD, Ding CQ, Zhang DX (2004) Eight polymorphic microsatellite loci for the critically endangered crested ibis, Nipponia nippon (Ciconiiformes: Threskiornithidae). Molecular Ecology Notes, 4, 615-617. Felsenstein J (1993) phylip, Phylogeny Inference Package. Department of Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. Rutkowska J (2005) Maternal effects in zebra finches - status quo and where we go. ISBE Newsletter, 17, 15. Fitch WM, Margoliash E (1967) Construction of phylogenetic trees. Science, 155, 279-284. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure from multi-locus genotype data. Genetics, 155, 945-959. Reynolds J, Weir BS, Cockerham CC (1983) Estimation for the coancestry coefficient: basis for a short-term genetic distance. Genetics, 105, 767-779. Goudet J (1995) Fstat version 1.2: a computer program to calculate F-statistics. Journal of Heredity, 86, 485-486. Ellegren H (2000) Microsatellite mutations in the germline: implications for evolutionary inference. Trends in Genetics, 16, 551-558. Nuin PAS (2005) winpop 2.5: software for representing population genetics phenomena. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 6, 390-393. McClearn GE (1999) Exotic mice as models for aging research: polemic and prospectus by R. Miller et al. Neurobiology of Aging, 20, 233-236. Collins SA, Ten Cate C (1996) Does beak colour affect female preference in zebra finches? Animal Behaviour, 52, 105-112. Pruett CL, Winker K (2005) Northwestern song sparrow populations show genetic effects of sequential colonization. Molecular Ecology, 14, 1421-1434. Miller RA, Austad S, Burke D et al . (1999) Exotic mice as models for aging research: polemic and prospectus. Neurobiology of Aging, 20, 217-231. Nei M, Maruyama T, Chakraborty R (1975) Bottleneck effect and genetic variability in populations. Evolution, 29, 1-10. Richardson DS, Jury FL, Dawson DA et al . (2000) Fifty Seychelles warbler (Acrocephalus sechellensis) microsatellite loci polymorphic in Sylviidae species and their cross-species amplification in other passerine birds. Molecular Ecology, 9, 2226-2231. Zann R (1996) The Zebra Finch. Oxford University Press, New York. Baker AJ, Moeed A (1987) Rapid genetic differentiation and founder effect in colonizing populations of common mynas (Acridotheres tristis). Evolution, 41, 525-538. Kalinowski ST, Taper ML, Marshall TC (2006) Revising how the computer program cervus accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Molecular Ecology, 16, 1099-1106. Lynch M, Walsh B (1998) Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts. Jennions MD (1998) The effect of leg band symmetry on female-male association in zebra finches. Animal Behavior, 55, 61-67. Hawley DM, Hanley D, Dhondt AA, Lovette IJ (2006) Molecular evidence for a founder effect in invasive house finch (Carpodacus mexicanus) populations experiencing an emergent disease epidemic. Molecular Ecology, 15, 263-275. Dakin EE, Avise JC (2004) Microsatellite null alleles in parentage analysis. Heredity, 93, 504-509. Burley NT, Foster VS (2004) Digit ratio varies with sex, egg order and strength of mate preference in zebra finches. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 271, 239-244. Weir BS, Cockerham CC (1984) Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution, 38, 1358-1370. Clegg SM, Degnan SM, Kikkawa J et al . (2002) Genetic consequences of sequential founder events by an island-colonizing bird. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 99, 8127-8132. Sossinka R (1970) Domestikationserscheinungen beim Zebrafinken Taeniopygia guttata castanotis (Gould). Zoologischer Jahrbücher, 97, 455-524. Keller LF, Waller DM (2002) Inbreeding effects in wild populations. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 17, 230-241. Forstmeier W (2005) Quantitative genetics and behavioural correlates of digit ratio in the zebra finch. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 272, 2641-2649. Festing MFW (1999) Warning: the use of heterogeneous mice may seriously damage your research. Neurobiology of Aging, 20, 237-244. Fowler K, Whitlock MC (1999) The distribution of phenotypic variance with inbreeding. Evolution, 53, 1143-1156. Tarr CL, Conant S, Fleischer RC (1998) Founder events and variation at microsatellite loci in an insular passerine bird, the Laysan finch (Telespiza cantans). Molecular Ecology, 7, 719-731. Hale ML, Petrie M, Wolff K (2004) Polymorphic microsatellite loci in peafowl (Pavo cristatus). Molecular Ecology Notes, 4, 528-530. 2002; 17 2005; 272 2006; 16 2000; 9 2002; 99 2006; 15 2004; 4 1998 1996; 52 2007 1996 1970; 97 1999; 20 1993 1967; 155 2000; 155 1995; 86 1983; 105 2000; 16 1987; 41 2004; 93 1984; 38 2004; 271 1975; 29 2005; 6 1999; 53 19962004 1998; 7 2005; 17 1998; 55 2005; 14 e_1_2_7_6_1 e_1_2_7_5_1 e_1_2_7_4_1 e_1_2_7_3_1 e_1_2_7_8_1 Lynch M (e_1_2_7_22_1) 1998 e_1_2_7_7_1 e_1_2_7_19_1 e_1_2_7_18_1 e_1_2_7_17_1 e_1_2_7_16_1 e_1_2_7_2_1 e_1_2_7_15_1 e_1_2_7_14_1 Pritchard JK (e_1_2_7_27_1) 2000; 155 e_1_2_7_13_1 e_1_2_7_12_1 e_1_2_7_11_1 e_1_2_7_26_1 e_1_2_7_28_1 e_1_2_7_29_1 Sossinka R (e_1_2_7_32_1) 1970; 97 Rutkowska J (e_1_2_7_31_1) 2005; 17 Miller RA (e_1_2_7_24_1) 1999; 20 Kalinowski ST (e_1_2_7_20_1) 2006; 16 Festing MFW (e_1_2_7_10_1) 1999; 20 McClearn GE (e_1_2_7_23_1) 1999; 20 Zann R (e_1_2_7_35_1) 1996 e_1_2_7_30_1 e_1_2_7_25_1 e_1_2_7_33_1 e_1_2_7_34_1 e_1_2_7_21_1 Felsenstein J (e_1_2_7_9_1) 1993 |
| References_xml | – reference: Ji YJ, Liu YD, Ding CQ, Zhang DX (2004) Eight polymorphic microsatellite loci for the critically endangered crested ibis, Nipponia nippon (Ciconiiformes: Threskiornithidae). Molecular Ecology Notes, 4, 615-617. – reference: Zann R (1996) The Zebra Finch. Oxford University Press, New York. – reference: Ellegren H (2000) Microsatellite mutations in the germline: implications for evolutionary inference. Trends in Genetics, 16, 551-558. – reference: Tarr CL, Conant S, Fleischer RC (1998) Founder events and variation at microsatellite loci in an insular passerine bird, the Laysan finch (Telespiza cantans). Molecular Ecology, 7, 719-731. – reference: Weir BS, Cockerham CC (1984) Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution, 38, 1358-1370. – reference: Fitch WM, Margoliash E (1967) Construction of phylogenetic trees. Science, 155, 279-284. – reference: Reynolds J, Weir BS, Cockerham CC (1983) Estimation for the coancestry coefficient: basis for a short-term genetic distance. Genetics, 105, 767-779. – reference: Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure from multi-locus genotype data. Genetics, 155, 945-959. – reference: Rutkowska J (2005) Maternal effects in zebra finches - status quo and where we go. ISBE Newsletter, 17, 15. – reference: Burley NT, Foster VS (2004) Digit ratio varies with sex, egg order and strength of mate preference in zebra finches. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 271, 239-244. – reference: Collins SA, Ten Cate C (1996) Does beak colour affect female preference in zebra finches? Animal Behaviour, 52, 105-112. – reference: Richardson DS, Jury FL, Dawson DA et al . (2000) Fifty Seychelles warbler (Acrocephalus sechellensis) microsatellite loci polymorphic in Sylviidae species and their cross-species amplification in other passerine birds. Molecular Ecology, 9, 2226-2231. – reference: Baker AJ, Moeed A (1987) Rapid genetic differentiation and founder effect in colonizing populations of common mynas (Acridotheres tristis). Evolution, 41, 525-538. – reference: Kalinowski ST, Taper ML, Marshall TC (2006) Revising how the computer program cervus accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Molecular Ecology, 16, 1099-1106. – reference: Forstmeier W (2005) Quantitative genetics and behavioural correlates of digit ratio in the zebra finch. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 272, 2641-2649. – reference: Nei M, Maruyama T, Chakraborty R (1975) Bottleneck effect and genetic variability in populations. Evolution, 29, 1-10. – reference: Goudet J (1995) Fstat version 1.2: a computer program to calculate F-statistics. Journal of Heredity, 86, 485-486. – reference: Keller LF, Waller DM (2002) Inbreeding effects in wild populations. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 17, 230-241. – reference: Festing MFW (1999) Warning: the use of heterogeneous mice may seriously damage your research. Neurobiology of Aging, 20, 237-244. – reference: Nuin PAS (2005) winpop 2.5: software for representing population genetics phenomena. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 6, 390-393. – reference: Hawley DM, Hanley D, Dhondt AA, Lovette IJ (2006) Molecular evidence for a founder effect in invasive house finch (Carpodacus mexicanus) populations experiencing an emergent disease epidemic. Molecular Ecology, 15, 263-275. – reference: Pruett CL, Winker K (2005) Northwestern song sparrow populations show genetic effects of sequential colonization. Molecular Ecology, 14, 1421-1434. – reference: Lynch M, Walsh B (1998) Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts. – reference: Clegg SM, Degnan SM, Kikkawa J et al . (2002) Genetic consequences of sequential founder events by an island-colonizing bird. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 99, 8127-8132. – reference: Dakin EE, Avise JC (2004) Microsatellite null alleles in parentage analysis. Heredity, 93, 504-509. – reference: Miller RA, Austad S, Burke D et al . (1999) Exotic mice as models for aging research: polemic and prospectus. Neurobiology of Aging, 20, 217-231. – reference: Sossinka R (1970) Domestikationserscheinungen beim Zebrafinken Taeniopygia guttata castanotis (Gould). Zoologischer Jahrbücher, 97, 455-524. – reference: McClearn GE (1999) Exotic mice as models for aging research: polemic and prospectus by R. Miller et al. Neurobiology of Aging, 20, 233-236. – reference: Fowler K, Whitlock MC (1999) The distribution of phenotypic variance with inbreeding. Evolution, 53, 1143-1156. – reference: Hale ML, Petrie M, Wolff K (2004) Polymorphic microsatellite loci in peafowl (Pavo cristatus). Molecular Ecology Notes, 4, 528-530. – reference: Felsenstein J (1993) phylip, Phylogeny Inference Package. Department of Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. – reference: Jennions MD (1998) The effect of leg band symmetry on female-male association in zebra finches. Animal Behavior, 55, 61-67. – volume: 97 start-page: 455 year: 1970 end-page: 524 article-title: Domestikationserscheinungen beim Zebrafinken (Gould) publication-title: Zoologischer Jahrbücher – volume: 93 start-page: 504 year: 2004 end-page: 509 article-title: Microsatellite null alleles in parentage analysis publication-title: Heredity – year: 19962004 – volume: 155 start-page: 279 year: 1967 end-page: 284 article-title: Construction of phylogenetic trees publication-title: Science – volume: 105 start-page: 767 year: 1983 end-page: 779 article-title: Estimation for the coancestry coefficient: basis for a short‐term genetic distance publication-title: Genetics – volume: 17 start-page: 230 year: 2002 end-page: 241 article-title: Inbreeding effects in wild populations publication-title: Trends in Ecology & Evolution – volume: 20 start-page: 237 year: 1999 end-page: 244 article-title: Warning: the use of heterogeneous mice may seriously damage your research publication-title: Neurobiology of Aging – volume: 52 start-page: 105 year: 1996 end-page: 112 article-title: Does beak colour affect female preference in zebra finches? publication-title: Animal Behaviour – volume: 4 start-page: 528 year: 2004 end-page: 530 article-title: Polymorphic microsatellite loci in peafowl ( publication-title: Molecular Ecology Notes – year: 2007 – volume: 17 start-page: 15 year: 2005 article-title: Maternal effects in zebra finches — status quo and where we go publication-title: ISBE Newsletter – volume: 9 start-page: 2226 year: 2000 end-page: 2231 article-title: Fifty Seychelles warbler ( ) microsatellite loci polymorphic in Sylviidae species and their cross‐species amplification in other passerine birds publication-title: Molecular Ecology – year: 1996 – volume: 86 start-page: 485 year: 1995 end-page: 486 article-title: Fstat version 1.2: a computer program to calculate ‐statistics publication-title: Journal of Heredity – volume: 4 start-page: 615 year: 2004 end-page: 617 article-title: Eight polymorphic microsatellite loci for the critically endangered crested ibis, Nipponia nippon (Ciconiiformes: Threskiornithidae) publication-title: Molecular Ecology Notes – volume: 20 start-page: 233 year: 1999 end-page: 236 article-title: Exotic mice as models for aging research: polemic and prospectus by R. Miller et al publication-title: Neurobiology of Aging – volume: 53 start-page: 1143 year: 1999 end-page: 1156 article-title: The distribution of phenotypic variance with inbreeding publication-title: Evolution – volume: 16 start-page: 551 year: 2000 end-page: 558 article-title: Microsatellite mutations in the germline: implications for evolutionary inference publication-title: Trends in Genetics – volume: 16 start-page: 1099 year: 2006 end-page: 1106 article-title: Revising how the computer program cervus accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment publication-title: Molecular Ecology – volume: 155 start-page: 945 year: 2000 end-page: 959 article-title: Inference of population structure from multi‐locus genotype data publication-title: Genetics – volume: 29 start-page: 1 year: 1975 end-page: 10 article-title: Bottleneck effect and genetic variability in populations publication-title: Evolution – volume: 99 start-page: 8127 year: 2002 end-page: 8132 article-title: Genetic consequences of sequential founder events by an island‐colonizing bird publication-title: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA – year: 1998 – volume: 271 start-page: 239 year: 2004 end-page: 244 article-title: Digit ratio varies with sex, egg order and strength of mate preference in zebra finches. publication-title: Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences – volume: 14 start-page: 1421 year: 2005 end-page: 1434 article-title: Northwestern song sparrow populations show genetic effects of sequential colonization publication-title: Molecular Ecology – volume: 20 start-page: 217 year: 1999 end-page: 231 article-title: Exotic mice as models for aging research: polemic and prospectus publication-title: Neurobiology of Aging – volume: 55 start-page: 61 year: 1998 end-page: 67 article-title: The effect of leg band symmetry on female–male association in zebra finches publication-title: Animal Behavior – volume: 7 start-page: 719 year: 1998 end-page: 731 article-title: Founder events and variation at microsatellite loci in an insular passerine bird, the Laysan finch ( publication-title: Molecular Ecology – volume: 6 start-page: 390 year: 2005 end-page: 393 article-title: winpop 2.5: software for representing population genetics phenomena publication-title: Briefings in Bioinformatics – volume: 38 start-page: 1358 year: 1984 end-page: 1370 article-title: Estimating ‐statistics for the analysis of population structure publication-title: Evolution – volume: 272 start-page: 2641 year: 2005 end-page: 2649 article-title: Quantitative genetics and behavioural correlates of digit ratio in the zebra finch publication-title: Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences – volume: 15 start-page: 263 year: 2006 end-page: 275 article-title: Molecular evidence for a founder effect in invasive house finch ( ) populations experiencing an emergent disease epidemic publication-title: Molecular Ecology – volume: 41 start-page: 525 year: 1987 end-page: 538 article-title: Rapid genetic differentiation and founder effect in colonizing populations of common mynas ( publication-title: Evolution – year: 1993 – volume: 16 start-page: 1099 year: 2006 ident: e_1_2_7_20_1 article-title: Revising how the computer program cervus accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment publication-title: Molecular Ecology doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03089.x – ident: e_1_2_7_18_1 doi: 10.1006/anbe.1997.0579 – ident: e_1_2_7_12_1 doi: 10.1098/rspb.2005.3264 – ident: e_1_2_7_17_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02767.x – volume: 97 start-page: 455 year: 1970 ident: e_1_2_7_32_1 article-title: Domestikationserscheinungen beim Zebrafinken Taeniopygia guttata castanotis (Gould) publication-title: Zoologischer Jahrbücher – ident: e_1_2_7_3_1 – ident: e_1_2_7_14_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1999.tb04528.x – volume-title: phylip, Phylogeny Inference Package year: 1993 ident: e_1_2_7_9_1 – ident: e_1_2_7_25_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1975.tb00807.x – ident: e_1_2_7_26_1 doi: 10.1093/bib/6.4.390 – ident: e_1_2_7_6_1 doi: 10.1006/anbe.1996.0156 – ident: e_1_2_7_19_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2004.00754.x – ident: e_1_2_7_21_1 doi: 10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02489-8 – ident: e_1_2_7_29_1 doi: 10.1093/genetics/105.3.767 – ident: e_1_2_7_7_1 doi: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800545 – volume: 20 start-page: 233 year: 1999 ident: e_1_2_7_23_1 article-title: Exotic mice as models for aging research: polemic and prospectus by R. Miller et al publication-title: Neurobiology of Aging – ident: e_1_2_7_11_1 doi: 10.1126/science.155.3760.279 – ident: e_1_2_7_4_1 doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2562 – ident: e_1_2_7_30_1 doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2000.105338.x – ident: e_1_2_7_16_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2004.00714.x – ident: e_1_2_7_2_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1987.tb05823.x – volume-title: The Zebra Finch year: 1996 ident: e_1_2_7_35_1 doi: 10.1093/oso/9780198540793.001.0001 – ident: e_1_2_7_8_1 doi: 10.1016/S0168-9525(00)02139-9 – volume: 20 start-page: 217 year: 1999 ident: e_1_2_7_24_1 article-title: Exotic mice as models for aging research: polemic and prospectus publication-title: Neurobiology of Aging – volume: 155 start-page: 945 year: 2000 ident: e_1_2_7_27_1 article-title: Inference of population structure from multi‐locus genotype data publication-title: Genetics doi: 10.1093/genetics/155.2.945 – ident: e_1_2_7_13_1 – volume: 17 start-page: 15 year: 2005 ident: e_1_2_7_31_1 article-title: Maternal effects in zebra finches — status quo and where we go publication-title: ISBE Newsletter – ident: e_1_2_7_28_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02493.x – ident: e_1_2_7_5_1 doi: 10.1073/pnas.102583399 – volume-title: Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits year: 1998 ident: e_1_2_7_22_1 – ident: e_1_2_7_33_1 doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00385.x – ident: e_1_2_7_34_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1984.tb05657.x – volume: 20 start-page: 237 year: 1999 ident: e_1_2_7_10_1 article-title: Warning: the use of heterogeneous mice may seriously damage your research publication-title: Neurobiology of Aging – ident: e_1_2_7_15_1 doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a111627 |
| SSID | ssj0013255 |
| Score | 2.2962313 |
| Snippet | The zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata) is a small Australian grassland songbird that has been domesticated over the past two centuries. Because it is easy to... The zebra finch ( Taeniopygia guttata ) is a small Australian grassland songbird that has been domesticated over the past two centuries. Because it is easy to... |
| SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref wiley istex fao |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
| StartPage | 4039 |
| SubjectTerms | alleles anatomy & histology Animal populations Animals Australia Birds Body Size bottleneck captive animals Domestication Ecology Europe Finches Finches - anatomy & histology Finches - genetics founder effect Genetic diversity Genetic Drift Genetic Variation genetics Genotype Genotype & phenotype Grasslands Inbreeding loci Microsatellite Repeats Molecular biology North America population dynamics Population number population size Songbirds Taeniopygia guttata |
| Title | Genetic variation and differentiation in captive and wild zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) |
| URI | https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-NKTQ290T-K/fulltext.pdf https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fj.1365-294X.2007.03444.x https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17894758 https://www.proquest.com/docview/210716286 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1891874871 https://www.proquest.com/docview/20504768 https://www.proquest.com/docview/47456788 https://www.proquest.com/docview/68317266 |
| Volume | 16 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos000249829500007&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVWIB databaseName: Wiley Online Library Full Collection 2020 customDbUrl: eissn: 1365-294X dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0013255 issn: 0962-1083 databaseCode: DRFUL dateStart: 19970101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com providerName: Wiley-Blackwell |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3db9MwED-xDiRe-IaFwTASQvAQlMRObD-i0YK0UfHRir4gy3GcKtqUVv2YVv56zk5aVmlDE-ItSmyrOd-df5e73g_glUyi1BSch4k2Uci0KMJc0zgs8azKjUYMXfru-se83xejkfzS1j-5_8I0_SE2H9ycZXh_7Qxc5_NtI_cVWpKN2k6ElDH2DvHkboJqnHZg98O33vD4Qk7Bc6AiZk_Q-Qi6Xddz6Vpbh9VOqScIYZ30zy_Do9vw1p9Pvbv_883uwZ0WpZL3jVrdhxu2fgC3Gt7KFV51fa_r1UP46dpW4yByhjG332Si64KsaVcW7b2qJkZPnWf1j_FnFeSXS1mTsqodZRd5M9C2ribT1bjSZLxcIAbWbx_BsNcdHH4KW8aG0CASYqGlUhvOM8ms4UXJCs1LY0sd50bmJiok12laRkWS5HgPsYZ2iUqTUYoBPuWGPoZOPantHpA0iQpuJY1NIVmZGpHhyjTKHamoRUwXAF9vjTJtO3PHqnGqLoQ1KEblxOjINrnyYlTnAcSbmdOmpcc15uzh7is9Rs-rht8Tl--NXG80ygJ47VVis5aenbhqOZ6qH_2Pqn80-JrIaKCOAthf64xqHcVcYcTteniJLICXm6do4S5to2s7Wc5VLKQjTsTINoAXV4xBi4sYRo5Xj2AcoTIXfxmRCbRPxGsBPGkU-o90uJAMA8sAMq-31xab-tw9dFdP_3XiPtz2H9N99eQz6CxmS_scbpqzRTWfHcAOH4mD1s5_AzwoS8s |
| linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
| linkToHtml | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3db9MwED_BBoIXvmFhwIKEEDwEJbETx49otAy1i_hoRV8my3GSKgKlVT-mlb-eOyctq7ShCfEWJbaVnO_Ov_M59wN4JUM_MrkQXqiN73Gd5F6mWeCVuFZlRiOGLm11_b5I02Q0kp9bOiD6F6apD7HZcCPLsP6aDJw2pLet3B7RknzUliJknPN3CCh3OWoVqvvuh6_dYf9cUsGSoCJoD9H7JGz7YM-FY22tVtdLPUEMS-I_uwiQbuNbu0B17_7XT7sHd1qc6r5vFOs-XCvqB3CzYa5c4VXHVrtePYQTKlyNjdxTjLrtNLu6zt018cqivVfVrtFT8q32Mb5X7v6ipLVbVjWRdrlvBrqoq8l0Na60O14uEAXrt49g2O0MDo-8lrPBM4iFuFcwqY0QseSFEXnJcy1KU5Q6yIzMjJ9LoaOo9PMwzPAeog1NqUoTM4YhPhOGPYadelIXe-BGoZ-LQrLA5JKXkUliHJn5GdGKFojqHBDruVGmLWhOvBo_1bnABsWoSIxEtymUFaM6cyDY9Jw2RT2u0GcPp1_pMfpeNfwWUsbXp-pojDvw2urEZiw9-0Hn5USkvqcfVdobfAmlP1A9B_bXSqNaVzFXGHNTFa8kduDl5inaOCVudF1MlnMVJJKoEzG2deDgkjZocz7H2PHyFlwgWBbJX1rECVooIjYHnjQa_Uc6IpEcQ0sHYqu4VxabOu4c0tXTf-14ALeOBsd91f-U9vbhtt1at2cpn8HOYrYsnsMNc7qo5rMXrbn_BlHhTtM |
| linkToPdf | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3db9MwED9BB4gXvmFhwIKEEDwEpbETx49oawG1VAM60ZfJcmynqkBp1Y9p5a_nzk3LKm1oQrxFiW0l57vz73zO_QBeySROjRUiSrSJI65zGxWaNaMS16rCaMTQpa-u3xW9Xj4YyKOaDoj-hVnVh9hsuJFleH9NBu4mtty2cn9ES_JBXYqQcc7fIaDc4cQp04Cdw6_t4-65pIInQUXQnqD3ydn2wZ4Lx9para6XeowYlsR_dhEg3ca3foFq3_2vn3YP7tQ4NXy_Uqz7cM1VD-DmirlyiVctX-16-RBOqHA1NgpPMer20xzqyoZr4pV5fW9UhUZPyLf6x_heNvxFSeuwHFVE2hW-6WtXjcaT5XCkw-FijihYv30Ex-1W_-BjVHM2RAaxEI8ck9oIkUnujLAlt1qUxpW6WRhZmNhKodO0jG2SFHgP0YamVKXJGMMQnwnDHkOjGlduF8I0ia1wkjWNlbxMTZ7hyCwuiFbUIaoLQKznRpm6oDnxavxU5wIbFKMiMRLdplBejOosgOam52RV1OMKfXZx-pUeou9Vx98SyvjGVB2N8QBee53YjKWnP-i8nEjV994H1ev0vyQy7qtOAHtrpVG1q5gpjLmpileeBfBy8xRtnBI3unLjxUw1c0nUiRjbBrB_SRu0uZhj7Hh5Cy4QLIv8Ly2yHC0UEVsAT1Ya_Uc6IpccQ8sAMq-4Vxab-tw6oKun_9pxH24dHbZV91Ovswe3_c66P0r5DBrz6cI9hxvmdD6aTV_U1v4bZVtOTg |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Genetic+variation+and+differentiation+in+captive+and+wild+zebra+finches+%28Taeniopygia+guttata%29&rft.jtitle=Molecular+ecology&rft.au=stmeier%2C+Wolfgang&rft.au=Segelbacher%2C+Gernot&rft.au=Mueller%2C+Jakob+C&rft.au=Kempenaers%2C+Bart&rft.date=2007-10-01&rft.issn=0962-1083&rft.eissn=1365-294X&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=19&rft.spage=4039&rft.epage=4050&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fj.1365-294X.2007.03444.x&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0962-1083&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0962-1083&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0962-1083&client=summon |