CRISPR knockout screening outperforms shRNA and CRISPRi in identifying essential genes

CRISPR knockout screens outperform shRNA and CRISPR-interference screens in a side-by-side comparison. High-throughput genetic screens have become essential tools for studying a wide variety of biological processes. Here we experimentally compare systems based on clustered regularly interspaced shor...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Nature biotechnology Vol. 34; no. 6; pp. 631 - 633
Main Authors: Evers, Bastiaan, Jastrzebski, Katarzyna, Heijmans, Jeroen P M, Grernrum, Wipawadee, Beijersbergen, Roderick L, Bernards, Rene
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: New York Nature Publishing Group US 01.06.2016
Nature Publishing Group
Subjects:
ISSN:1087-0156, 1546-1696, 1546-1696
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:CRISPR knockout screens outperform shRNA and CRISPR-interference screens in a side-by-side comparison. High-throughput genetic screens have become essential tools for studying a wide variety of biological processes. Here we experimentally compare systems based on clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9) or its transcriptionally repressive variant, CRISPR-interference (CRISPRi), with a traditional short hairpin RNA (shRNA)-based system for performing lethality screens. We find that the CRISPR technology performed best, with low noise, minimal off-target effects and consistent activity across reagents.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:1087-0156
1546-1696
1546-1696
DOI:10.1038/nbt.3536