CRISPR knockout screening outperforms shRNA and CRISPRi in identifying essential genes
CRISPR knockout screens outperform shRNA and CRISPR-interference screens in a side-by-side comparison. High-throughput genetic screens have become essential tools for studying a wide variety of biological processes. Here we experimentally compare systems based on clustered regularly interspaced shor...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Nature biotechnology Vol. 34; no. 6; pp. 631 - 633 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
New York
Nature Publishing Group US
01.06.2016
Nature Publishing Group |
| Subjects: | |
| ISSN: | 1087-0156, 1546-1696, 1546-1696 |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | CRISPR knockout screens outperform shRNA and CRISPR-interference screens in a side-by-side comparison.
High-throughput genetic screens have become essential tools for studying a wide variety of biological processes. Here we experimentally compare systems based on clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9) or its transcriptionally repressive variant, CRISPR-interference (CRISPRi), with a traditional short hairpin RNA (shRNA)-based system for performing lethality screens. We find that the CRISPR technology performed best, with low noise, minimal off-target effects and consistent activity across reagents. |
|---|---|
| Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
| ISSN: | 1087-0156 1546-1696 1546-1696 |
| DOI: | 10.1038/nbt.3536 |