A Systematic Review of Virtual Reality Simulators for Robot-assisted Surgery
No single large published randomized controlled trial (RCT) has confirmed the efficacy of virtual simulators in the acquisition of skills to the standard required for safe clinical robotic surgery. This remains the main obstacle for the adoption of these virtual simulators in surgical residency curr...
Saved in:
| Published in: | European urology Vol. 69; no. 6; pp. 1065 - 1080 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Switzerland
Elsevier B.V
01.06.2016
|
| Subjects: | |
| ISSN: | 0302-2838, 1873-7560, 1873-7560 |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Abstract | No single large published randomized controlled trial (RCT) has confirmed the efficacy of virtual simulators in the acquisition of skills to the standard required for safe clinical robotic surgery. This remains the main obstacle for the adoption of these virtual simulators in surgical residency curricula.
To evaluate the level of evidence in published studies on the efficacy of training on virtual simulators for robotic surgery.
In April 2015 a literature search was conducted on PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library, the Clinical Trials Database (US) and the Meta Register of Controlled Trials. All publications were scrutinized for relevance to the review and for assessment of the levels of evidence provided using the classification developed by the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine.
The publications included in the review consisted of one RCT and 28 cohort studies on validity, and seven RCTs and two cohort studies on skills transfer from virtual simulators to robot-assisted surgery. Simulators were rated good for realism (face validity) and for usefulness as a training tool (content validity). However, the studies included used various simulation training methodologies, limiting the assessment of construct validity. The review confirms the absence of any consensus on which tasks and metrics are the most effective for the da Vinci Skills Simulator and dV-Trainer, the most widely investigated systems. Although there is consensus for the RoSS simulator, this is based on only two studies on construct validity involving four exercises. One study on initial evaluation of an augmented reality module for partial nephrectomy using the dV-Trainer reported high correlation (r=0.8) between in vivo porcine nephrectomy and a virtual renorrhaphy task according to the overall Global Evaluation Assessment of Robotic Surgery (GEARS) score. In one RCT on skills transfer, the experimental group outperformed the control group, with a significant difference in overall GEARS score (p=0.012) during performance of urethrovesical anastomosis on an inanimate model. Only one study included assessment of a surgical procedure on real patients: subjects trained on a virtual simulator outperformed the control group following traditional training. However, besides the small numbers, this study was not randomized.
There is an urgent need for a large, well-designed, preferably multicenter RCT to study the efficacy of virtual simulation for acquisition competence in and safe execution of clinical robotic-assisted surgery.
We reviewed the literature on virtual simulators for robot-assisted surgery. Validity studies used various simulation training methodologies. It is not clear which exercises and metrics are the most effective in distinguishing different levels of experience on the da Vinci robot. There is no reported evidence of skills transfer from simulation to clinical surgery on real patients.
This review critically appraises the evidence published regarding virtual simulators for robot-assisted surgery and addresses key aspects that are currently unsolved for which research should be conducted. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | No single large published randomized controlled trial (RCT) has confirmed the efficacy of virtual simulators in the acquisition of skills to the standard required for safe clinical robotic surgery. This remains the main obstacle for the adoption of these virtual simulators in surgical residency curricula.
To evaluate the level of evidence in published studies on the efficacy of training on virtual simulators for robotic surgery.
In April 2015 a literature search was conducted on PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library, the Clinical Trials Database (US) and the Meta Register of Controlled Trials. All publications were scrutinized for relevance to the review and for assessment of the levels of evidence provided using the classification developed by the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine.
The publications included in the review consisted of one RCT and 28 cohort studies on validity, and seven RCTs and two cohort studies on skills transfer from virtual simulators to robot-assisted surgery. Simulators were rated good for realism (face validity) and for usefulness as a training tool (content validity). However, the studies included used various simulation training methodologies, limiting the assessment of construct validity. The review confirms the absence of any consensus on which tasks and metrics are the most effective for the da Vinci Skills Simulator and dV-Trainer, the most widely investigated systems. Although there is consensus for the RoSS simulator, this is based on only two studies on construct validity involving four exercises. One study on initial evaluation of an augmented reality module for partial nephrectomy using the dV-Trainer reported high correlation (r=0.8) between in vivo porcine nephrectomy and a virtual renorrhaphy task according to the overall Global Evaluation Assessment of Robotic Surgery (GEARS) score. In one RCT on skills transfer, the experimental group outperformed the control group, with a significant difference in overall GEARS score (p=0.012) during performance of urethrovesical anastomosis on an inanimate model. Only one study included assessment of a surgical procedure on real patients: subjects trained on a virtual simulator outperformed the control group following traditional training. However, besides the small numbers, this study was not randomized.
There is an urgent need for a large, well-designed, preferably multicenter RCT to study the efficacy of virtual simulation for acquisition competence in and safe execution of clinical robotic-assisted surgery.
We reviewed the literature on virtual simulators for robot-assisted surgery. Validity studies used various simulation training methodologies. It is not clear which exercises and metrics are the most effective in distinguishing different levels of experience on the da Vinci robot. There is no reported evidence of skills transfer from simulation to clinical surgery on real patients.
This review critically appraises the evidence published regarding virtual simulators for robot-assisted surgery and addresses key aspects that are currently unsolved for which research should be conducted. Abstract Context No single large published randomized controlled trial (RCT) has confirmed the efficacy of virtual simulators in the acquisition of skills to the standard required for safe clinical robotic surgery. This remains the main obstacle for the adoption of these virtual simulators in surgical residency curricula. Objective To evaluate the level of evidence in published studies on the efficacy of training on virtual simulators for robotic surgery. Evidence acquisition In April 2015 a literature search was conducted on PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library, the Clinical Trials Database (US) and the Meta Register of Controlled Trials. All publications were scrutinized for relevance to the review and for assessment of the levels of evidence provided using the classification developed by the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. Evidence synthesis The publications included in the review consisted of one RCT and 28 cohort studies on validity, and seven RCTs and two cohort studies on skills transfer from virtual simulators to robot-assisted surgery. Simulators were rated good for realism (face validity) and for usefulness as a training tool (content validity). However, the studies included used various simulation training methodologies, limiting the assessment of construct validity. The review confirms the absence of any consensus on which tasks and metrics are the most effective for the da Vinci Skills Simulator and dV-Trainer, the most widely investigated systems. Although there is consensus for the RoSS simulator, this is based on only two studies on construct validity involving four exercises. One study on initial evaluation of an augmented reality module for partial nephrectomy using the dV-Trainer reported high correlation ( r = 0.8) between in vivo porcine nephrectomy and a virtual renorrhaphy task according to the overall Global Evaluation Assessment of Robotic Surgery (GEARS) score. In one RCT on skills transfer, the experimental group outperformed the control group, with a significant difference in overall GEARS score ( p = 0.012) during performance of urethrovesical anastomosis on an inanimate model. Only one study included assessment of a surgical procedure on real patients: subjects trained on a virtual simulator outperformed the control group following traditional training. However, besides the small numbers, this study was not randomized. Conclusions There is an urgent need for a large, well-designed, preferably multicenter RCT to study the efficacy of virtual simulation for acquisition competence in and safe execution of clinical robotic-assisted surgery. Patient summary We reviewed the literature on virtual simulators for robot-assisted surgery. Validity studies used various simulation training methodologies. It is not clear which exercises and metrics are the most effective in distinguishing different levels of experience on the da Vinci robot. There is no reported evidence of skills transfer from simulation to clinical surgery on real patients. Context: No single large published randomized controlled trial (RCT) has confirmed the efficacy of virtual simulators in the acquisition of skills to the standard required for safe clinical robotic surgery. This remains the main obstacle for the adoption of these virtual simulators in surgical residency curricula. Objective: To evaluate the level of evidence in published studies on the efficacy of training on virtual simulators for robotic surgery. Evidence acquisition In April 2015 a literature search was conducted on PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library, the Clinical Trials Database (US) and the Meta Register of Controlled Trials. All publications were scrutinized for relevance to the review and for assessment of the levels of evidence provided using the classification developed by the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. Evidence synthesis The publications included in the review consisted of one RCT and 28 cohort studies on validity, and seven RCTs and two cohort studies on skills transfer from virtual simulators to robot-assisted surgery. Simulators were rated good for realism (face validity) and for usefulness as a training tool (content validity). However, the studies included used various simulation training methodologies, limiting the assessment of construct validity. The review confirms the absence of any consensus on which tasks and metrics are the most effective for the da Vinci Skills Simulator and dV-Trainer, the most widely investigated systems. Although there is consensus for the RoSS simulator, this is based on only two studies on construct validity involving four exercises. One study on initial evaluation of an augmented reality module for partial nephrectomy using the dV-Trainer reported high correlation (r = 0.8) between in vivo porcine nephrectomy and a virtual renorrhaphy task according to the overall Global Evaluation Assessment of Robotic Surgery (GEARS) score. In one RCT on skills transfer, the experimental group outperformed the control group, with a significant difference in overall GEARS score (p = 0.012) during performance of urethrovesical anastomosis on an inanimate model. Only one study included assessment of a surgical procedure on real patients: subjects trained on a virtual simulator outperformed the control group following traditional training. However, besides the small numbers, this study was not randomized. Conclusions: There is an urgent need for a large, well-designed, preferably multicenter RCT to study the efficacy of virtual simulation for acquisition competence in and safe execution of clinical robotic-assisted surgery. Patient summary: We reviewed the literature on virtual simulators for robot-assisted surgery. Validity studies used various simulation training methodologies. It is not clear which exercises and metrics are the most effective in distinguishing different levels of experience on the da Vinci robot. There is no reported evidence of skills transfer from simulation to clinical surgery on real patients. No single large published randomized controlled trial (RCT) has confirmed the efficacy of virtual simulators in the acquisition of skills to the standard required for safe clinical robotic surgery. This remains the main obstacle for the adoption of these virtual simulators in surgical residency curricula. To evaluate the level of evidence in published studies on the efficacy of training on virtual simulators for robotic surgery. In April 2015 a literature search was conducted on PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library, the Clinical Trials Database (US) and the Meta Register of Controlled Trials. All publications were scrutinized for relevance to the review and for assessment of the levels of evidence provided using the classification developed by the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. The publications included in the review consisted of one RCT and 28 cohort studies on validity, and seven RCTs and two cohort studies on skills transfer from virtual simulators to robot-assisted surgery. Simulators were rated good for realism (face validity) and for usefulness as a training tool (content validity). However, the studies included used various simulation training methodologies, limiting the assessment of construct validity. The review confirms the absence of any consensus on which tasks and metrics are the most effective for the da Vinci Skills Simulator and dV-Trainer, the most widely investigated systems. Although there is consensus for the RoSS simulator, this is based on only two studies on construct validity involving four exercises. One study on initial evaluation of an augmented reality module for partial nephrectomy using the dV-Trainer reported high correlation (r=0.8) between in vivo porcine nephrectomy and a virtual renorrhaphy task according to the overall Global Evaluation Assessment of Robotic Surgery (GEARS) score. In one RCT on skills transfer, the experimental group outperformed the control group, with a significant difference in overall GEARS score (p=0.012) during performance of urethrovesical anastomosis on an inanimate model. Only one study included assessment of a surgical procedure on real patients: subjects trained on a virtual simulator outperformed the control group following traditional training. However, besides the small numbers, this study was not randomized. There is an urgent need for a large, well-designed, preferably multicenter RCT to study the efficacy of virtual simulation for acquisition competence in and safe execution of clinical robotic-assisted surgery. We reviewed the literature on virtual simulators for robot-assisted surgery. Validity studies used various simulation training methodologies. It is not clear which exercises and metrics are the most effective in distinguishing different levels of experience on the da Vinci robot. There is no reported evidence of skills transfer from simulation to clinical surgery on real patients. No single large published randomized controlled trial (RCT) has confirmed the efficacy of virtual simulators in the acquisition of skills to the standard required for safe clinical robotic surgery. This remains the main obstacle for the adoption of these virtual simulators in surgical residency curricula.CONTEXTNo single large published randomized controlled trial (RCT) has confirmed the efficacy of virtual simulators in the acquisition of skills to the standard required for safe clinical robotic surgery. This remains the main obstacle for the adoption of these virtual simulators in surgical residency curricula.To evaluate the level of evidence in published studies on the efficacy of training on virtual simulators for robotic surgery.OBJECTIVETo evaluate the level of evidence in published studies on the efficacy of training on virtual simulators for robotic surgery.In April 2015 a literature search was conducted on PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library, the Clinical Trials Database (US) and the Meta Register of Controlled Trials. All publications were scrutinized for relevance to the review and for assessment of the levels of evidence provided using the classification developed by the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine.EVIDENCE ACQUISITIONIn April 2015 a literature search was conducted on PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library, the Clinical Trials Database (US) and the Meta Register of Controlled Trials. All publications were scrutinized for relevance to the review and for assessment of the levels of evidence provided using the classification developed by the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine.The publications included in the review consisted of one RCT and 28 cohort studies on validity, and seven RCTs and two cohort studies on skills transfer from virtual simulators to robot-assisted surgery. Simulators were rated good for realism (face validity) and for usefulness as a training tool (content validity). However, the studies included used various simulation training methodologies, limiting the assessment of construct validity. The review confirms the absence of any consensus on which tasks and metrics are the most effective for the da Vinci Skills Simulator and dV-Trainer, the most widely investigated systems. Although there is consensus for the RoSS simulator, this is based on only two studies on construct validity involving four exercises. One study on initial evaluation of an augmented reality module for partial nephrectomy using the dV-Trainer reported high correlation (r=0.8) between in vivo porcine nephrectomy and a virtual renorrhaphy task according to the overall Global Evaluation Assessment of Robotic Surgery (GEARS) score. In one RCT on skills transfer, the experimental group outperformed the control group, with a significant difference in overall GEARS score (p=0.012) during performance of urethrovesical anastomosis on an inanimate model. Only one study included assessment of a surgical procedure on real patients: subjects trained on a virtual simulator outperformed the control group following traditional training. However, besides the small numbers, this study was not randomized.EVIDENCE SYNTHESISThe publications included in the review consisted of one RCT and 28 cohort studies on validity, and seven RCTs and two cohort studies on skills transfer from virtual simulators to robot-assisted surgery. Simulators were rated good for realism (face validity) and for usefulness as a training tool (content validity). However, the studies included used various simulation training methodologies, limiting the assessment of construct validity. The review confirms the absence of any consensus on which tasks and metrics are the most effective for the da Vinci Skills Simulator and dV-Trainer, the most widely investigated systems. Although there is consensus for the RoSS simulator, this is based on only two studies on construct validity involving four exercises. One study on initial evaluation of an augmented reality module for partial nephrectomy using the dV-Trainer reported high correlation (r=0.8) between in vivo porcine nephrectomy and a virtual renorrhaphy task according to the overall Global Evaluation Assessment of Robotic Surgery (GEARS) score. In one RCT on skills transfer, the experimental group outperformed the control group, with a significant difference in overall GEARS score (p=0.012) during performance of urethrovesical anastomosis on an inanimate model. Only one study included assessment of a surgical procedure on real patients: subjects trained on a virtual simulator outperformed the control group following traditional training. However, besides the small numbers, this study was not randomized.There is an urgent need for a large, well-designed, preferably multicenter RCT to study the efficacy of virtual simulation for acquisition competence in and safe execution of clinical robotic-assisted surgery.CONCLUSIONSThere is an urgent need for a large, well-designed, preferably multicenter RCT to study the efficacy of virtual simulation for acquisition competence in and safe execution of clinical robotic-assisted surgery.We reviewed the literature on virtual simulators for robot-assisted surgery. Validity studies used various simulation training methodologies. It is not clear which exercises and metrics are the most effective in distinguishing different levels of experience on the da Vinci robot. There is no reported evidence of skills transfer from simulation to clinical surgery on real patients.PATIENT SUMMARYWe reviewed the literature on virtual simulators for robot-assisted surgery. Validity studies used various simulation training methodologies. It is not clear which exercises and metrics are the most effective in distinguishing different levels of experience on the da Vinci robot. There is no reported evidence of skills transfer from simulation to clinical surgery on real patients. |
| Author | Moglia, Andrea Ferrari, Mauro Mosca, Franco Ferrari, Vincenzo Morelli, Luca Cuschieri, Alfred |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Andrea surname: Moglia fullname: Moglia, Andrea email: andrea.moglia@endocas.org organization: EndoCAS, Center for Computer Assisted Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy – sequence: 2 givenname: Vincenzo surname: Ferrari fullname: Ferrari, Vincenzo organization: EndoCAS, Center for Computer Assisted Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy – sequence: 3 givenname: Luca surname: Morelli fullname: Morelli, Luca organization: EndoCAS, Center for Computer Assisted Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy – sequence: 4 givenname: Mauro surname: Ferrari fullname: Ferrari, Mauro organization: EndoCAS, Center for Computer Assisted Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy – sequence: 5 givenname: Franco surname: Mosca fullname: Mosca, Franco organization: Cisanello Teaching Hospital, Pisa, Italy – sequence: 6 givenname: Alfred surname: Cuschieri fullname: Cuschieri, Alfred organization: Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, Pisa, Italy |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26433570$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNqVkt2L1DAUxYOsuLOr_4FIH31pvUmaphURlsUvGBB2FvEtpOmtZGybNR8r_e_NMKsPggw-BS6_c244516Qs8UtSMhzChUF2rzaV5h88q5iQEUFXQWMPiIb2kpeStHAGdkAB1aylrfn5CKEPQBw0fEn5Jw1NedCwoZsr4rdGiLOOlpT3OC9xZ-FG4sv1sekpzzRk41rsbNzmnR0PhSj88WN610sdQg2a4dil_w39OtT8njUU8BnD-8luX3_7vb6Y7n9_OHT9dW2NA0VsTS0GYVoBjT56xrNKBhrgcmhGTuQ3Oh2HBpqWtogCujztO8HyceBMtlTwy_Jy6PtnXc_EoaoZhsMTpNe0KWgaAutpB1vxWlUdlLUNaN1Rl88oKmfcVB33s7ar-p3Vhmoj4DxLgSP4x-EgjpUovbqWIk6VKKgU7mSLHv9l8zYmNN2S_TaTqfEb49izHHmbrwKxuJicLAeTVSDs_9rYCa7WKOn77hi2Lvkl1yVoiowBWp3OJnDxVAB0LHuazZ482-D0_t_AfIG0zE |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1007_s11701_019_00934_1 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijom_2018_01_005 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_020_07823_x crossref_primary_10_1109_LRA_2019_2893709 crossref_primary_10_1177_17562872231189924 crossref_primary_10_1002_rcs_1874 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_hansur_2017_03_002 crossref_primary_10_1111_bju_13710 crossref_primary_10_1177_0194599820901684 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bjps_2021_03_066 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12909_021_02872_9 crossref_primary_10_1080_13645706_2019_1625404 crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm11144145 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10055_020_00444_8 crossref_primary_10_1002_lio2_854 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_017_5460_x crossref_primary_10_4240_wjgs_v8_i11_735 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heliyon_2024_e27340 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11701_022_01492_9 crossref_primary_10_3390_electronics14071249 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_wneu_2020_04_102 crossref_primary_10_1051_e3sconf_202448603023 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_018_6146_8 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11701_020_01072_9 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11701_018_0833_2 crossref_primary_10_4103_UCCI_UCCI_16_25 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11548_020_02156_5 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11701_023_01641_8 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_018_6109_0 crossref_primary_10_1089_jmxr_2024_0022 crossref_primary_10_1186_s41077_018_0071_8 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11701_020_01167_3 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00092_019_2213_2 crossref_primary_10_1007_s13304_018_0517_5 crossref_primary_10_1097_MOU_0000000000000914 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_surg_2021_01_051 crossref_primary_10_1111_jcal_12899 crossref_primary_10_1007_s13304_018_0559_8 crossref_primary_10_1134_S1064226922120099 crossref_primary_10_3390_app10249051 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00423_024_03514_6 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_eururo_2015_11_026 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jajs_2021_02_006 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00345_019_02901_9 crossref_primary_10_54531_rxca9513 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urology_2017_09_023 crossref_primary_10_1177_03064190241308659 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijmecsci_2022_107590 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_measurement_2022_112186 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jsurg_2019_06_015 crossref_primary_10_1038_s44222_024_00156_7 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_017_5963_5 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_chb_2021_106808 crossref_primary_10_3390_electronics10060678 crossref_primary_10_1002_rcs_2100 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpurol_2020_02_003 crossref_primary_10_1002_rcs_2195 crossref_primary_10_1080_13645706_2016_1267018 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_juro_2018_05_080 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_oraloncology_2025_107444 crossref_primary_10_1155_2019_6813719 crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm13061590 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_022_09576_1 crossref_primary_10_1590_0100_6991e_20202522 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00345_018_2472_7 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10278_018_0122_7 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jsurg_2017_11_005 crossref_primary_10_1093_bjsopen_zraa066 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_brainres_2021_147607 crossref_primary_10_1111_bju_13901 crossref_primary_10_1109_LRA_2018_2890209 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11701_018_0811_8 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_wneu_2017_06_160 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_023_10615_8 crossref_primary_10_1002_rcs_2075 crossref_primary_10_1002_rcs_2350 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11701_023_01625_8 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compbiomed_2025_109847 crossref_primary_10_1109_LRA_2022_3222994 crossref_primary_10_1177_15330338211051547 crossref_primary_10_1155_2021_6876974 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compind_2019_05_001 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_procir_2022_02_151 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_psychsport_2022_102201 crossref_primary_10_1089_end_2020_1037 crossref_primary_10_1002_rcs_1828 crossref_primary_10_3390_healthcare12030286 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00345_019_02989_z crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2022_067379 crossref_primary_10_3389_feduc_2019_00080 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_amjsurg_2025_116197 crossref_primary_10_1109_TBME_2018_2883816 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jmig_2016_12_016 crossref_primary_10_3390_info10050154 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11934_019_0947_8 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11701_022_01404_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jss_2020_03_021 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10055_020_00439_5 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_024_10914_8 crossref_primary_10_1093_asj_sjy329 crossref_primary_10_1109_RBME_2017_2749527 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10439_023_03379_8 crossref_primary_10_3389_fdgth_2024_1428534 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_media_2021_102296 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11701_022_01373_1 crossref_primary_10_1111_bju_14219 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12894_021_00839_y crossref_primary_10_1051_matecconf_202134308009 crossref_primary_10_1302_0301_620X_100B5_BJJ_2017_1439 crossref_primary_10_1002_rcs_2414 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mser_2017_02_001 crossref_primary_10_1089_end_2016_0508 crossref_primary_10_1111_joa_13647 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00404_018_4756_y crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecns_2019_08_002 crossref_primary_10_2196_10967 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_euf_2018_08_018 crossref_primary_10_1051_matecconf_201712801012 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13063_025_08975_8 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11701_023_01813_6 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_euf_2016_02_004 crossref_primary_10_1080_24725579_2019_1692263 crossref_primary_10_1109_TMI_2023_3242980 crossref_primary_10_1002_rcs_2381 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11701_021_01302_8 crossref_primary_10_1097_MOU_0000000000000566 crossref_primary_10_1097_JS9_0000000000000976 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10029_021_02391_y crossref_primary_10_1007_s10055_021_00501_w crossref_primary_10_1016_j_procs_2022_01_219 crossref_primary_10_3390_app11052338 crossref_primary_10_1089_end_2019_0541 crossref_primary_10_20517_2574_1225_2023_81 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11934_021_01043_z crossref_primary_10_1007_s11701_018_0786_5 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11934_016_0614_2 crossref_primary_10_3390_s23063262 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_humov_2025_103360 crossref_primary_10_1109_TBME_2020_3011867 crossref_primary_10_1017_S0263574722001175 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00268_019_05108_6 crossref_primary_10_1089_end_2018_0871 crossref_primary_10_1590_0100_6991e_20202608 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10758_023_09713_2 crossref_primary_10_1098_rsos_171587 crossref_primary_10_1145_3626517 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jsurg_2018_08_017 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jmig_2021_12_012 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jsurg_2020_04_019 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00417_020_04613_y crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bpobgyn_2021_10_004 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00170_024_14827_7 crossref_primary_10_1097_AOG_0000000000002860 crossref_primary_10_20517_ais_2025_47 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpurol_2016_08_012 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_016_5240_z crossref_primary_10_1007_s11548_020_02259_z crossref_primary_10_1097_CCO_0000000000000879 crossref_primary_10_1007_s13304_018_0584_7 crossref_primary_10_1080_13645706_2017_1365729 crossref_primary_10_1089_lap_2021_0082 crossref_primary_10_1097_SLA_0000000000003220 crossref_primary_10_1002_rcs_2040 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00345_019_02858_9 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jmig_2020_12_001 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11548_017_1666_6 crossref_primary_10_1080_1463922X_2020_1849442 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11934_020_00992_1 crossref_primary_10_3390_app10010322 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00402_020_03352_3 crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm12072557 crossref_primary_10_1080_00016357_2018_1441437 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11701_018_00909_8 crossref_primary_10_1111_codi_16905 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09694.x 10.1089/end.2009.0190 10.1007/s11701-008-0099-1 10.1089/end.2012.0328 10.1111/bju.12045 10.1016/j.jsurg.2013.10.006 10.1007/s00464-013-3393-6 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000245 10.1016/j.urology.2012.01.028 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.12.160 10.1111/bju.12974 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.06.050 10.1155/2014/507076 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.10.025 10.1007/s00464-012-2704-7 10.1016/j.urology.2012.02.059 10.1002/bjs.8893 10.1016/j.urology.2011.07.1426 10.1016/j.urology.2014.05.005 10.1016/j.urology.2009.11.069 10.5489/cuaj.222 10.5489/cuaj.419 10.5489/cuaj.1807 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.11.033 10.1159/000353435 10.1016/j.juro.2011.10.160 10.1016/j.ijsu.2013.08.006 10.1007/s00464-012-2237-0 10.1002/rcs.181 10.1111/bju.12704 10.1177/001872087101300607 10.1016/j.urology.2012.12.033 10.1097/00000658-200210000-00008 10.1111/bju.12559 10.1016/j.juro.2015.02.2949 10.1007/s00464-013-3373-x 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000045 10.1159/000369624 10.1016/j.juro.2011.09.032 10.1001/jamaoto.2013.4720 10.1016/j.juro.2011.09.154 10.1016/j.urology.2008.12.044 10.1097/SPV.0b013e3182a09101 10.1308/003588411X12851639108358 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.03.512 10.1089/lap.2012.0396 10.1016/j.juro.2011.04.064 10.1089/end.2008.0250 10.1016/j.jss.2013.06.054 10.1007/s00464-001-9184-5 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | 2015 European Association of Urology European Association of Urology Copyright © 2015 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: 2015 European Association of Urology – notice: European Association of Urology – notice: Copyright © 2015 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 7QP |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts |
| DatabaseTitleList | Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: 7X8 name: MEDLINE - Academic url: https://search.proquest.com/medline sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Medicine |
| EISSN | 1873-7560 |
| EndPage | 1080 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 26433570 10_1016_j_eururo_2015_09_021 S030228381500929X 1_s2_0_S030228381500929X |
| Genre | Systematic Review Journal Article |
| GroupedDBID | --- --K --M .1- .55 .FO .GJ .~1 0R~ 0~B 1B1 1P~ 1~. 1~5 29G 30W 34G 39C 4.4 457 4G. 53G 5GY 5RE 5VS 7-5 71M 8P~ 8UI AABNK AAEDT AAEDW AAIKJ AAKOC AALRI AAOAW AAQFI AATTM AAXKI AAXUO AAYIC AAYWO ABBQC ABBTS ABFNM ABJNI ABLJU ABMAC ABMZM ABOCM ABWCG ABWVN ABXDB ACDAQ ACIEU ACLOT ACQXL ACRLP ACRPL ACVFH ADBBV ADCNI ADEZE ADMUD ADNMO AEBSH AEIPS AEKER AENEX AEUPX AEVXI AEYAO AFJKZ AFPUW AFRHN AFSIO AFTJW AFXIZ AGHFR AGUBO AGYEJ AIEXJ AIGII AIIUN AIKHN AITUG AJRQY AJUYK AKBMS AKRWK AKYEP ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMRAJ ANKPU ANZVX APXCP AXJTR BKOJK BLXMC BNPGV CAG COF CS3 CYUIP DU5 E0A EBS EFJIC EFKBS EFLBG EJD EO8 EO9 EP2 EP3 F5P FB. FDB FEDTE FIRID FNPLU FYGXN G-Q GBLVA HVGLF HZ~ IHE J1W KOM M41 MO0 N9A O-L O1H O9- OAUVE OK. OW. OZT P-8 P-9 P2P PC. Q38 RKO ROL RPZ SCC SDF SDG SEL SES SEW SPCBC SSH SSZ T5K UDS UJ6 UV1 X7M Z5R ZGI ZXP ~G- ~HD AACTN AFCTW AFKWA AJOXV AMFUW RIG AAIAV ABLVK ABYKQ AHPSJ AJBFU AZPMC LCYCR ZA5 9DU AAYXX CITATION AGCQF AGRNS CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 7QP |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c615t-c16f556dec201aecf5228027d6f9073ca8fd61c816ee50b6f9bbd73fd127b1c3 |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 213 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000377047400033&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 0302-2838 1873-7560 |
| IngestDate | Sun Sep 28 02:22:38 EDT 2025 Sat Sep 27 20:59:04 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 05:32:08 EDT 2025 Sat Nov 29 04:11:21 EST 2025 Tue Nov 18 21:41:00 EST 2025 Fri Feb 23 02:16:45 EST 2024 Tue Feb 25 19:58:22 EST 2025 Tue Oct 14 19:30:39 EDT 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 6 |
| Keywords | Robotic surgery curriculum Robotic surgery simulation da Vinci simulator |
| Language | English |
| License | Copyright © 2015 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. |
| LinkModel | OpenURL |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c615t-c16f556dec201aecf5228027d6f9073ca8fd61c816ee50b6f9bbd73fd127b1c3 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 ObjectType-Review-3 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-4 |
| OpenAccessLink | http://hdl.handle.net/11568/767526 |
| PMID | 26433570 |
| PQID | 1797544214 |
| PQPubID | 23479 |
| PageCount | 16 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1808719385 proquest_miscellaneous_1797544214 pubmed_primary_26433570 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_eururo_2015_09_021 crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_eururo_2015_09_021 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_eururo_2015_09_021 elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S030228381500929X elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_eururo_2015_09_021 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2016-06-01 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2016-06-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 06 year: 2016 text: 2016-06-01 day: 01 |
| PublicationDecade | 2010 |
| PublicationPlace | Switzerland |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Switzerland |
| PublicationTitle | European urology |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Eur Urol |
| PublicationYear | 2016 |
| Publisher | Elsevier B.V |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier B.V |
| References | Hung, Zehnder, Patil (bib0395) 2011; 186 Korets, Mues, Graversen (bib0390) 2011; 78 Transparent Reporting of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses. The PRISMA statement. Stegemann, Ahmed, Syed (bib0550) 2013; 81 Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Guidance for undertaking reviews in health care. Kiely, Gotlieb, Lau (bib0545) 2014; 133 Lyons, Goldfarb, Jones (bib0445) 2013; 27 Moglia, Ferrari, Morelli (bib0515) 2014; 28 Baheti, Seshadri, Kumar (bib0590) 2008 Sperry, O’Malley, Weinstein (bib0605) 2014; 76 Bernstein Leibhard LLP. da Vinci robot lawsuit information center. Lee, Mucksavage, Kerbl (bib0400) 2012; 187 Finnegan, Meraney, Staff (bib0480) 2012; 80 Fletcher, Orlansky (bib0650) 1986 Fisher, Dasgupta, Mottrie (bib0615) 2015; 13 Gavazzi, Bahsoun, Van Haute (bib0470) 2011; 93 Cho, Hahn, Kwak (bib0525) 2013; 23 Seymour, Gallagher, Roman (bib0575) 2002; 236 Lendvay, Casale, Sweet (bib0375) 2008; 2 Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine. Levels of evidence 2011. Raza, Froghi, Chowriappa (bib0500) 2014; 71 Zhang, Sumer (bib0630) 2013; 139 Chowriappa, Raza, Fazili (bib0460) 2015; 115 Sethi, Peine, Mohammadi (bib0385) 2009; 23 Gallagher, O'Sullivan (bib0555) 2011 Ramos, Montez, Tripp (bib0450) 2014; 113 Chowriappa, Shi, Raza (bib0495) 2013; 185 Kelly, Margules, Kundavaram (bib0440) 2012; 79 Ahlberg, Enochsson, Gallagher (bib0585) 2007; 193 Teishima, Hattori, Inoue (bib0635) 2014; 8 Seixas-Mikelus, Kesavadas, Srimathveeravalli (bib0455) 2010; 76 Intuitive Surgical. Investor relations. Hung, Shah, Dalag (bib0430) 2015; 194 Stone, McCloy (bib0570) 1996; 1 Foell, Finelli, Yasufuku (bib0610) 2013; 7 Dawe, Windsor, Broeders (bib0345) 2014; 259 van der Meijden, Broeders, Schijven (bib0465) 2010; 19 Lerner, Ayalew, Peine (bib0520) 2010; 24 Lendvay, Casale, Sweet (bib0595) 2008; 132 Culligan, Gurshumov, Lewis (bib0540) 2014; 20 Egi, Hattori, Tokunaga (bib0415) 2013; 50 Alzahrani, Haddad, Alkhayal (bib0435) 2013; 7 Lawson Health Research Institute. Randomized controlled evaluation of robotic cardiac surgery training modalities. Whitehurst, Lockrow, Lendvay (bib0530) 2015; 22 Vaccaro, Crisp, Fellner (bib0535) 2013; 19 Gupta, Lantz, Alzharani (bib0565) 2014; 8 The Cochrane Collaboration. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Connolly, Seligman, Kastenmeier (bib0490) 2014; 28 Seixas-Mikelus, Stegemann, Kesavadas (bib0475) 2011; 107 Roscoe (bib0645) 1971; 13 Hung, Jayaratna, Teruya (bib0485) 2013; 112 Hung, Patil, Zehnder (bib0510) 2012; 187 Ahmed, Khan, Mottrie (bib0620) 2015; 116 Hyltander, Liljegren, Rhodin (bib0580) 2002; 16 Rehman, Raza, Stegemann (bib0640) 2013; 11 Schreuder, Persson, Wolswijk (bib0420) 2014; 2014 Maan, Maan, Darzi (bib0560) 2012; 99 Balasundaram, Aggarwal, Darzi (bib0505) 2008; 4 Goh, Goldfarb, Sander (bib0350) 2012; 187 Liss, Abdelshehid, Quach (bib0405) 2012; 26 Kang, Cho, Kang (bib0425) 2014; 84 Commonwealth of Massachusetts Board of Registration in Medicine. Advisory on robot-assisted surgery. Kenney, Wszolek, Gould (bib0380) 2009; 73 Perrenot, Perez, Tran (bib0410) 2012; 26 Volpe, Ahmed, Dasgupta (bib0625) 2015; 68 Connolly (10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0490) 2014; 28 van der Meijden (10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0465) 2010; 19 Roscoe (10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0645) 1971; 13 Teishima (10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0635) 2014; 8 Seixas-Mikelus (10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0455) 2010; 76 Seymour (10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0575) 2002; 236 Gavazzi (10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0470) 2011; 93 Finnegan (10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0480) 2012; 80 Maan (10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0560) 2012; 99 Schreuder (10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0420) 2014; 2014 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0355 Ahmed (10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0620) 2015; 116 Alzahrani (10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0435) 2013; 7 Gupta (10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0565) 2014; 8 Ramos (10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0450) 2014; 113 Hyltander (10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0580) 2002; 16 Dawe (10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0345) 2014; 259 Moglia (10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0515) 2014; 28 Perrenot (10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0410) 2012; 26 Goh (10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0350) 2012; 187 Lendvay (10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0375) 2008; 2 Chowriappa (10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0460) 2015; 115 Sperry (10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0605) 2014; 76 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0600 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0365 Egi (10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0415) 2013; 50 Stone (10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0570) 1996; 1 Volpe (10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0625) 2015; 68 Kang (10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0425) 2014; 84 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0360 Seixas-Mikelus (10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0475) 2011; 107 Korets (10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0390) 2011; 78 Lerner (10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0520) 2010; 24 Whitehurst (10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0530) 2015; 22 Fisher (10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0615) 2015; 13 Foell (10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0610) 2013; 7 Gallagher (10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0555) 2011 Kiely (10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0545) 2014; 133 Liss (10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0405) 2012; 26 Lendvay (10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0595) 2008; 132 Stegemann (10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0550) 2013; 81 Hung (10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0430) 2015; 194 Hung (10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0485) 2013; 112 Cho (10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0525) 2013; 23 Hung (10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0510) 2012; 187 Kenney (10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0380) 2009; 73 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0335 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0330 Chowriappa (10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0495) 2013; 185 Zhang (10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0630) 2013; 139 Fletcher (10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0650) 1986 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0370 Sethi (10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0385) 2009; 23 Ahlberg (10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0585) 2007; 193 Hung (10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0395) 2011; 186 Raza (10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0500) 2014; 71 Vaccaro (10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0535) 2013; 19 Baheti (10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0590) 2008 Kelly (10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0440) 2012; 79 Balasundaram (10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0505) 2008; 4 Rehman (10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0640) 2013; 11 Lyons (10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0445) 2013; 27 Culligan (10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0540) 2014; 20 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0340 Lee (10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0400) 2012; 187 26688370 - Eur Urol. 2016 Jun;69(6):1081-2. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.11.026. |
| References_xml | – volume: 50 start-page: 292 year: 2013 end-page: 300 ident: bib0415 article-title: Face, content and concurrent validity of the Mimic publication-title: Eur Surg Res – volume: 194 start-page: 520 year: 2015 end-page: 526 ident: bib0430 article-title: Development and validation of a novel robotic procedure-specific simulation platform: partial nephrectomy publication-title: J Urol – reference: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Guidance for undertaking reviews in health care. – volume: 186 start-page: 1019 year: 2011 end-page: 1024 ident: bib0395 article-title: Face, content and construct validity of a novel robotic surgery simulator publication-title: Urology – reference: Intuitive Surgical. Investor relations. – volume: 71 start-page: 316 year: 2014 end-page: 324 ident: bib0500 article-title: Construct validation of the key components of Fundamental Skills of Robotic Surgery (FSRS) curriculum—a multi-institution prospective study publication-title: J Surg Educ – volume: 8 start-page: E493 year: 2014 end-page: E497 ident: bib0635 article-title: Retention of robot-assisted surgical skills in urological surgeons acquired using Mimic dV-Trainer publication-title: Can UrolAssoc J – volume: 84 start-page: 345 year: 2014 end-page: 350 ident: bib0425 article-title: The Tube 3 module designed for practicing vesicourethral anastomosis in a virtual reality robotic simulator: determination of face, content, and construct validity publication-title: Urology – volume: 115 start-page: 336 year: 2015 end-page: 345 ident: bib0460 article-title: Augmented-reality-based skills training for robot-assisted urethrovesical anastomosis: a multi-institutional randomised controlled trial publication-title: BJU Int – reference: The Cochrane Collaboration. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. – volume: 26 start-page: 2587 year: 2012 end-page: 2593 ident: bib0410 article-title: The virtual reality simulator dV-Trainer publication-title: Surg Endosc – volume: 23 start-page: 992 year: 2013 end-page: 998 ident: bib0525 article-title: Virtual reality training improves da Vinci performance: a prospective trial publication-title: J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A – volume: 7 start-page: 430 year: 2013 end-page: 434 ident: bib0610 article-title: Robotic surgery basic skills training: evaluation of a pilot multidisciplinary simulation-based curriculum publication-title: Can Urol Assoc J – volume: 28 start-page: 1830 year: 2014 end-page: 1837 ident: bib0515 article-title: Distribution of innate ability for surgery amongst medical students assessed by an advanced virtual reality surgical simulator publication-title: Surg Endosc – volume: 107 start-page: 1130 year: 2011 end-page: 1135 ident: bib0475 article-title: Content validation of a novel robotic surgical simulator publication-title: BJU Int – year: 2011 ident: bib0555 article-title: Fundamentals of surgical simulation – volume: 23 start-page: 503 year: 2009 end-page: 508 ident: bib0385 article-title: Validation of a novel virtual reality robotic simulator publication-title: J Endourol – volume: 99 start-page: 1610 year: 2012 end-page: 1621 ident: bib0560 article-title: Systematic review of predictors of surgical performance publication-title: Br J Surg – volume: 193 start-page: 797 year: 2007 end-page: 804 ident: bib0585 article-title: Proficiency-based virtual reality training significantly reduces the error rate for residents during their first 10 laparoscopic cholecystectomies publication-title: Am J Surg – volume: 187 start-page: 247 year: 2012 end-page: 252 ident: bib0350 article-title: Global evaluative assessment of robotic skills: validation of a clinical assessment tool to measure robotic surgical skills publication-title: Urology – volume: 73 start-page: 1288 year: 2009 end-page: 1292 ident: bib0380 article-title: Face, content, and construct validity of dV-trainer, a novel virtual reality simulator for robotic surgery publication-title: Urology – volume: 13 start-page: 561 year: 1971 end-page: 567 ident: bib0645 article-title: Incremental transfer effectiveness publication-title: Hum Factors – volume: 16 start-page: 1324 year: 2002 end-page: 1328 ident: bib0580 article-title: The transfer of basic skills learned in a laparoscopic simulator to the operating room publication-title: Surg Endosc – year: 1986 ident: bib0650 article-title: Recent studies on the cost-effectiveness of military training in TTCP countries. IDA Paper P-1896 – volume: 259 start-page: 236 year: 2014 end-page: 248 ident: bib0345 article-title: A systematic review of surgical skills transfer after simulation-based training: laparoscopic cholecystectomy and endoscopy publication-title: Ann Surg – volume: 11 start-page: 841 year: 2013 end-page: 846 ident: bib0640 article-title: Simulation-based robot-assisted surgical training: a health economic evaluation publication-title: Int J Surg – volume: 68 start-page: 292 year: 2015 end-page: 299 ident: bib0625 article-title: Pilot validation study of the European Association of Urology robotic training curriculum publication-title: Eur Urol – reference: Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine. Levels of evidence 2011. – volume: 2014 start-page: 507076 year: 2014 ident: bib0420 article-title: Validation of a novel virtual reality simulator for robotic surgery publication-title: Sci World J – volume: 187 start-page: 630 year: 2012 end-page: 637 ident: bib0510 article-title: Concurrent and predictive validation of a novel robotic surgery simulator: a prospective, randomized study publication-title: J Urol – volume: 22 start-page: 483 year: 2015 end-page: 488 ident: bib0530 article-title: Comparison of two simulation systems to support robotic-assisted surgical training: a pilot study (swine model) publication-title: J Minim Invasive Gynecol – volume: 76 start-page: 357 year: 2010 end-page: 360 ident: bib0455 article-title: Face validation of a novel robotic surgical simulator publication-title: Urology – volume: 112 start-page: 864 year: 2013 end-page: 871 ident: bib0485 article-title: Comparative assessment of three standardized robotic surgery training methods publication-title: BJU Int – volume: 116 start-page: 93 year: 2015 end-page: 101 ident: bib0620 article-title: Development of a standardised training curriculum for robotic surgery: a consensus statement from an international multidisciplinary group of experts publication-title: BJU Int – volume: 185 start-page: 561 year: 2013 end-page: 569 ident: bib0495 article-title: Development and validation of a composite scoring system for robot-assisted surgical training—the Robotic Skills Assessment Score publication-title: J Surg Res – volume: 19 start-page: 51 year: 2010 end-page: 58 ident: bib0465 article-title: The SEP “robot”: a valid virtual reality robotic simulator for the da Vinci surgical system? publication-title: Surg Technol Int – reference: Bernstein Leibhard LLP. da Vinci robot lawsuit information center. – volume: 20 start-page: 48 year: 2014 end-page: 51 ident: bib0540 article-title: Predictive validity of a training protocol using a robotic surgery simulator publication-title: Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg – volume: 2 start-page: 145 year: 2008 end-page: 149 ident: bib0375 article-title: Initial validation of a virtual-reality robotic simulator publication-title: J Robotic Surg – volume: 78 start-page: 1326 year: 2011 end-page: 1330 ident: bib0390 article-title: Validating the use of the Mimic dV-trainer for robotic surgery skill acquisition among urology residents publication-title: Urology – volume: 80 start-page: 330 year: 2012 end-page: 335 ident: bib0480 article-title: da Vinci skills simulator construct validation study: correlation of prior robotic experience with overall score and time score simulator performance publication-title: Urology – volume: 236 start-page: 458 year: 2002 end-page: 463 ident: bib0575 article-title: Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study publication-title: Ann Surg – volume: 24 start-page: 467 year: 2010 end-page: 472 ident: bib0520 article-title: Does training on a virtual reality robotic simulator improve performance on the da Vinci surgical system? publication-title: J Endourol – volume: 1 start-page: 42 year: 1996 end-page: 51 ident: bib0570 article-title: Virtual environment training systems for laparoscopic surgery; activities at the UK's Wolfson Centre for Minimally Invasive Therapy publication-title: J Med Virtual Reality – volume: 81 start-page: 767 year: 2013 end-page: 774 ident: bib0550 article-title: Fundamental skills of robotic surgery: a multi-institutional randomized controlled trial for validation of a simulation-based curriculum publication-title: Urology – volume: 132 start-page: 242 year: 2008 end-page: 244 ident: bib0595 article-title: VR robotic surgery: randomized blinded study of the dV-Trainer robotic simulator publication-title: Stud Health Technol Inf – volume: 27 start-page: 2020 year: 2013 end-page: 2030 ident: bib0445 article-title: Which skills really matter? Proving face, content, and construct validity for a commercial robotic simulator publication-title: Surg Endosc – volume: 113 start-page: 836 year: 2014 end-page: 842 ident: bib0450 article-title: Face, content, construct and concurrent validity of dry laboratory exercises for robotic training using a global assessment tool publication-title: BJU Int – volume: 28 start-page: 1691 year: 2014 end-page: 1694 ident: bib0490 article-title: Validation of a virtual reality-based robotic surgical skills curriculum publication-title: Surg Endosc – volume: 133 start-page: 193 year: 2014 ident: bib0545 article-title: A randomized controlled trial of a proficiency-based, virtual-reality robotic simulation curriculum to teach robotic suturing publication-title: Gynecol Oncol – volume: 187 start-page: 998 year: 2012 end-page: 1002 ident: bib0400 article-title: Validation study of a virtual reality robotic simulator—role as an assessment tool? publication-title: J Urol – volume: 19 start-page: 266 year: 2013 end-page: 270 ident: bib0535 article-title: Robotic virtual reality simulation plus standard robotic orientation versus standard robotic orientation alone: a randomized controlled trial publication-title: Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg – volume: 13 start-page: 115 year: 2015 end-page: 123 ident: bib0615 article-title: An over-view of robot assisted surgery curricula and the status of their validation publication-title: Int J Surg – volume: 26 start-page: 1629 year: 2012 end-page: 1634 ident: bib0405 article-title: Validation, correlation, and comparison of the da Vinci trainer™ and the da Vinci surgical skills simulator™ using the Mimic™ software for urologic robotic surgical education publication-title: J Endourol – reference: Commonwealth of Massachusetts Board of Registration in Medicine. Advisory on robot-assisted surgery. – reference: Lawson Health Research Institute. Randomized controlled evaluation of robotic cardiac surgery training modalities. – volume: 7 start-page: E520 year: 2013 end-page: E529 ident: bib0435 article-title: Validation of the da Vinci surgical skill simulator across three surgical disciplines: a pilot study publication-title: Can Urol Assoc J – volume: 79 start-page: 1068 year: 2012 end-page: 1072 ident: bib0440 article-title: Face, content, and construct validation of the da Vinci skills simulator publication-title: Urology – reference: Transparent Reporting of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses. The PRISMA statement. – volume: 8 start-page: 242 year: 2014 end-page: 246 ident: bib0565 article-title: Baseline urologic surgical skills among medical students: Differentiating trainees publication-title: Can Urol Assoc J – volume: 93 start-page: 152 year: 2011 end-page: 156 ident: bib0470 article-title: Face, content and construct validity of a virtual reality simulator for robotic surgery (SEP robot) publication-title: Ann R Coll Surg Engl – volume: 139 start-page: 1111 year: 2013 end-page: 1117 ident: bib0630 article-title: Transoral robotic surgery: simulation-based standardized training publication-title: JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg – start-page: 479 year: 2008 end-page: 480 ident: bib0590 article-title: RoSS: virtual reality robotic surgical simulator for the da Vinci surgical system. In: Proceedings of the 2008 Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems publication-title: IEEE; – volume: 76 start-page: 342 year: 2014 end-page: 352 ident: bib0605 article-title: The University of Pennsylvania curriculum for training otorhinolaryngology residents in transoral robotic surgery publication-title: J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec – volume: 4 start-page: 139 year: 2008 end-page: 145 ident: bib0505 article-title: Short-phase training on a virtual reality simulator improves technical performance in tele-robotic surgery publication-title: Int J Med Robot – volume: 107 start-page: 1130 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0475 article-title: Content validation of a novel robotic surgical simulator publication-title: BJU Int doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09694.x – volume: 24 start-page: 467 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0520 article-title: Does training on a virtual reality robotic simulator improve performance on the da Vinci surgical system? publication-title: J Endourol doi: 10.1089/end.2009.0190 – volume: 2 start-page: 145 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0375 article-title: Initial validation of a virtual-reality robotic simulator publication-title: J Robotic Surg doi: 10.1007/s11701-008-0099-1 – volume: 26 start-page: 1629 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0405 article-title: Validation, correlation, and comparison of the da Vinci trainer™ and the da Vinci surgical skills simulator™ using the Mimic™ software for urologic robotic surgical education publication-title: J Endourol doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0328 – volume: 112 start-page: 864 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0485 article-title: Comparative assessment of three standardized robotic surgery training methods publication-title: BJU Int doi: 10.1111/bju.12045 – volume: 71 start-page: 316 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0500 article-title: Construct validation of the key components of Fundamental Skills of Robotic Surgery (FSRS) curriculum—a multi-institution prospective study publication-title: J Surg Educ doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2013.10.006 – volume: 28 start-page: 1830 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0515 article-title: Distribution of innate ability for surgery amongst medical students assessed by an advanced virtual reality surgical simulator publication-title: Surg Endosc doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3393-6 – volume: 259 start-page: 236 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0345 article-title: A systematic review of surgical skills transfer after simulation-based training: laparoscopic cholecystectomy and endoscopy publication-title: Ann Surg doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000245 – volume: 79 start-page: 1068 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0440 article-title: Face, content, and construct validation of the da Vinci skills simulator publication-title: Urology doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.01.028 – volume: 22 start-page: 483 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0530 article-title: Comparison of two simulation systems to support robotic-assisted surgical training: a pilot study (swine model) publication-title: J Minim Invasive Gynecol doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.12.160 – volume: 116 start-page: 93 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0620 article-title: Development of a standardised training curriculum for robotic surgery: a consensus statement from an international multidisciplinary group of experts publication-title: BJU Int doi: 10.1111/bju.12974 – volume: 193 start-page: 797 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0585 article-title: Proficiency-based virtual reality training significantly reduces the error rate for residents during their first 10 laparoscopic cholecystectomies publication-title: Am J Surg doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.06.050 – volume: 2014 start-page: 507076 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0420 article-title: Validation of a novel virtual reality simulator for robotic surgery publication-title: Sci World J doi: 10.1155/2014/507076 – volume: 68 start-page: 292 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0625 article-title: Pilot validation study of the European Association of Urology robotic training curriculum publication-title: Eur Urol doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.10.025 – volume: 27 start-page: 2020 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0445 article-title: Which skills really matter? Proving face, content, and construct validity for a commercial robotic simulator publication-title: Surg Endosc doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2704-7 – volume: 80 start-page: 330 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0480 article-title: da Vinci skills simulator construct validation study: correlation of prior robotic experience with overall score and time score simulator performance publication-title: Urology doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.02.059 – volume: 99 start-page: 1610 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0560 article-title: Systematic review of predictors of surgical performance publication-title: Br J Surg doi: 10.1002/bjs.8893 – volume: 78 start-page: 1326 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0390 article-title: Validating the use of the Mimic dV-trainer for robotic surgery skill acquisition among urology residents publication-title: Urology doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.07.1426 – volume: 84 start-page: 345 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0425 article-title: The Tube 3 module designed for practicing vesicourethral anastomosis in a virtual reality robotic simulator: determination of face, content, and construct validity publication-title: Urology doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.05.005 – volume: 76 start-page: 357 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0455 article-title: Face validation of a novel robotic surgical simulator publication-title: Urology doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.11.069 – volume: 7 start-page: 430 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0610 article-title: Robotic surgery basic skills training: evaluation of a pilot multidisciplinary simulation-based curriculum publication-title: Can Urol Assoc J doi: 10.5489/cuaj.222 – volume: 7 start-page: E520 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0435 article-title: Validation of the da Vinci surgical skill simulator across three surgical disciplines: a pilot study publication-title: Can Urol Assoc J doi: 10.5489/cuaj.419 – volume: 8 start-page: 242 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0565 article-title: Baseline urologic surgical skills among medical students: Differentiating trainees publication-title: Can Urol Assoc J doi: 10.5489/cuaj.1807 – ident: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0355 – volume: 13 start-page: 115 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0615 article-title: An over-view of robot assisted surgery curricula and the status of their validation publication-title: Int J Surg doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.11.033 – ident: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0365 – volume: 50 start-page: 292 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0415 article-title: Face, content and concurrent validity of the Mimic® dV-Trainer for robot-assisted endoscopic surgery: a prospective study publication-title: Eur Surg Res doi: 10.1159/000353435 – ident: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0330 – volume: 187 start-page: 998 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0400 article-title: Validation study of a virtual reality robotic simulator—role as an assessment tool? publication-title: J Urol doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.10.160 – volume: 11 start-page: 841 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0640 article-title: Simulation-based robot-assisted surgical training: a health economic evaluation publication-title: Int J Surg doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2013.08.006 – volume: 19 start-page: 51 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0465 article-title: The SEP “robot”: a valid virtual reality robotic simulator for the da Vinci surgical system? publication-title: Surg Technol Int – volume: 26 start-page: 2587 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0410 article-title: The virtual reality simulator dV-Trainer® is a valid assessment tool for robotic surgical skills publication-title: Surg Endosc doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2237-0 – ident: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0335 – ident: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0360 – volume: 132 start-page: 242 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0595 article-title: VR robotic surgery: randomized blinded study of the dV-Trainer robotic simulator publication-title: Stud Health Technol Inf – volume: 1 start-page: 42 year: 1996 ident: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0570 article-title: Virtual environment training systems for laparoscopic surgery; activities at the UK's Wolfson Centre for Minimally Invasive Therapy publication-title: J Med Virtual Reality – volume: 4 start-page: 139 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0505 article-title: Short-phase training on a virtual reality simulator improves technical performance in tele-robotic surgery publication-title: Int J Med Robot doi: 10.1002/rcs.181 – volume: 115 start-page: 336 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0460 article-title: Augmented-reality-based skills training for robot-assisted urethrovesical anastomosis: a multi-institutional randomised controlled trial publication-title: BJU Int doi: 10.1111/bju.12704 – volume: 13 start-page: 561 year: 1971 ident: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0645 article-title: Incremental transfer effectiveness publication-title: Hum Factors doi: 10.1177/001872087101300607 – year: 1986 ident: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0650 – volume: 81 start-page: 767 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0550 article-title: Fundamental skills of robotic surgery: a multi-institutional randomized controlled trial for validation of a simulation-based curriculum publication-title: Urology doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.12.033 – volume: 236 start-page: 458 year: 2002 ident: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0575 article-title: Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study publication-title: Ann Surg doi: 10.1097/00000658-200210000-00008 – ident: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0600 – volume: 113 start-page: 836 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0450 article-title: Face, content, construct and concurrent validity of dry laboratory exercises for robotic training using a global assessment tool publication-title: BJU Int doi: 10.1111/bju.12559 – ident: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0340 – volume: 194 start-page: 520 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0430 article-title: Development and validation of a novel robotic procedure-specific simulation platform: partial nephrectomy publication-title: J Urol doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.02.2949 – volume: 28 start-page: 1691 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0490 article-title: Validation of a virtual reality-based robotic surgical skills curriculum publication-title: Surg Endosc doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3373-x – volume: 20 start-page: 48 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0540 article-title: Predictive validity of a training protocol using a robotic surgery simulator publication-title: Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000045 – volume: 76 start-page: 342 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0605 article-title: The University of Pennsylvania curriculum for training otorhinolaryngology residents in transoral robotic surgery publication-title: J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec doi: 10.1159/000369624 – volume: 187 start-page: 247 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0350 article-title: Global evaluative assessment of robotic skills: validation of a clinical assessment tool to measure robotic surgical skills publication-title: Urology doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.09.032 – volume: 139 start-page: 1111 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0630 article-title: Transoral robotic surgery: simulation-based standardized training publication-title: JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2013.4720 – volume: 187 start-page: 630 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0510 article-title: Concurrent and predictive validation of a novel robotic surgery simulator: a prospective, randomized study publication-title: J Urol doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.09.154 – volume: 73 start-page: 1288 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0380 article-title: Face, content, and construct validity of dV-trainer, a novel virtual reality simulator for robotic surgery publication-title: Urology doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.12.044 – volume: 19 start-page: 266 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0535 article-title: Robotic virtual reality simulation plus standard robotic orientation versus standard robotic orientation alone: a randomized controlled trial publication-title: Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg doi: 10.1097/SPV.0b013e3182a09101 – volume: 93 start-page: 152 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0470 article-title: Face, content and construct validity of a virtual reality simulator for robotic surgery (SEP robot) publication-title: Ann R Coll Surg Engl doi: 10.1308/003588411X12851639108358 – start-page: 479 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0590 article-title: RoSS: virtual reality robotic surgical simulator for the da Vinci surgical system. In: Proceedings of the 2008 Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems publication-title: IEEE; – volume: 133 start-page: 193 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0545 article-title: A randomized controlled trial of a proficiency-based, virtual-reality robotic simulation curriculum to teach robotic suturing publication-title: Gynecol Oncol doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.03.512 – year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0555 – volume: 8 start-page: E493 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0635 article-title: Retention of robot-assisted surgical skills in urological surgeons acquired using Mimic dV-Trainer publication-title: Can UrolAssoc J – volume: 23 start-page: 992 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0525 article-title: Virtual reality training improves da Vinci performance: a prospective trial publication-title: J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A doi: 10.1089/lap.2012.0396 – volume: 186 start-page: 1019 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0395 article-title: Face, content and construct validity of a novel robotic surgery simulator publication-title: Urology doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.04.064 – volume: 23 start-page: 503 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0385 article-title: Validation of a novel virtual reality robotic simulator publication-title: J Endourol doi: 10.1089/end.2008.0250 – ident: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0370 – volume: 185 start-page: 561 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0495 article-title: Development and validation of a composite scoring system for robot-assisted surgical training—the Robotic Skills Assessment Score publication-title: J Surg Res doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.06.054 – volume: 16 start-page: 1324 year: 2002 ident: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021_bib0580 article-title: The transfer of basic skills learned in a laparoscopic simulator to the operating room publication-title: Surg Endosc doi: 10.1007/s00464-001-9184-5 – reference: 26688370 - Eur Urol. 2016 Jun;69(6):1081-2. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.11.026. |
| SSID | ssj0003593 |
| Score | 2.5963967 |
| SecondaryResourceType | review_article |
| Snippet | No single large published randomized controlled trial (RCT) has confirmed the efficacy of virtual simulators in the acquisition of skills to the standard... Abstract Context No single large published randomized controlled trial (RCT) has confirmed the efficacy of virtual simulators in the acquisition of skills to... Context: No single large published randomized controlled trial (RCT) has confirmed the efficacy of virtual simulators in the acquisition of skills to the... |
| SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref elsevier |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
| StartPage | 1065 |
| SubjectTerms | Clinical Competence da Vinci simulator Humans Reproducibility of Results Robotic surgery curriculum Robotic surgery simulation Robotic Surgical Procedures - education Urology Validation Studies as Topic Virtual Reality |
| Title | A Systematic Review of Virtual Reality Simulators for Robot-assisted Surgery |
| URI | https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S030228381500929X https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S030228381500929X https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26433570 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1797544214 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1808719385 |
| Volume | 69 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos000377047400033&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVESC databaseName: Elsevier SD Freedom Collection Journals 2021 customDbUrl: eissn: 1873-7560 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0003593 issn: 0302-2838 databaseCode: AIEXJ dateStart: 20020101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.sciencedirect.com providerName: Elsevier |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1ba9swFBZpO8Zexu7LLkWDvXpItmVJj2G0bKMpow0hb8KWpZHS2iWXUvYP9q93ZMlOtqRrN9iLE4RlyTqfpKPjc76D0HvBjcy0kJGNSRqlhWaRsBmJUi2JzYzRtHH5Hx_x42Mxmcivvd6PNhbm6pxXlbi-lpf_VdRQBsJ2obN_Ie7uoVAA_0HocAWxw_VOgh8EFvKGivWki0wZT2cLz6TvNe_T6YXL3OVy7ThPw5O6qBcRaNJO7KCDbkZLd3Z7-F03xQ_rb8HjtnGO7Jb5Q-MyyDfOAuMpQKv6Xq-qzBwPaGMTWOptNYY5tLJukaDZynPKm8k2QmV8eFYTB-6pXD4Yv9oKnkSc-YQC7XLsM7cE2K2vrXB4ZWv7tHOO3LoHeHPEmSPOhK467z3WUNn6SOzf2LVPXb9ct0AxJqAqTnbQXsyZhAVyb_D5YPKl29aTwODcvkcbh9k4C262dZOec9M5ptFnRo_Qw3AQwQMPoMeoZ6on6P4wuFo8RUcDvMIR9jjCtcUBRzjgCK9whAFH-Fcc4YCjZ2h0eDD6-CkKqTciDSruItI0s4xlpdHwSrnRljnapJiXmZWwKehc2DKjWlCYzowUUFoUJU9sSWNeUJ08R7tVXZmXCFOrcwN6pSTEpCwtZK6thCfSIqalTmkfJe04KR1o6V12lHPV-h-eKT-6yo2uIlLB6PZR1NW69LQst9zPWhGoNuQYNkkFmLmlHt9Wz8zDhJ8rquaxImoDR-s1gzLrldQ7tPmuxYiCtd59wMsrUy-hLS4dX2VM0z_cI4jgcCoTrI9eeIB1IwSHnyRhnLz65769Rg9WM_4N2l3MluYtuqevFtP5bB_t8InYDxPnJ3H16JU |
| linkProvider | Elsevier |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A+Systematic+Review+of+Virtual+Reality+Simulators+for+Robot-assisted+Surgery&rft.jtitle=European+urology&rft.au=Moglia%2C+Andrea&rft.au=Ferrari%2C+Vincenzo&rft.au=Morelli%2C+Luca&rft.au=Ferrari%2C+Mauro&rft.date=2016-06-01&rft.pub=Elsevier+B.V&rft.issn=0302-2838&rft.eissn=1873-7560&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1065&rft.epage=1080&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.eururo.2015.09.021&rft.externalDocID=S030228381500929X |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0302-2838&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0302-2838&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0302-2838&client=summon |