Use of MRI in the diagnosis of fetal brain abnormalities in utero (MERIDIAN): a multicentre, prospective cohort study

In-utero MRI (iuMRI) has shown promise as an adjunct to ultrasound but the comparative diagnostic performance has been poorly defined. We aimed to assess whether the diagnostic accuracy and confidence of the prenatal diagnosis of fetal brain abnormalities is improved with iuMRI and assess the clinic...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:The Lancet (British edition) Ročník 389; číslo 10068; s. 538 - 546
Hlavní autoři: Griffiths, Paul D, Bradburn, Michael, Campbell, Michael J, Cooper, Cindy L, Graham, Ruth, Jarvis, Deborah, Kilby, Mark D, Mason, Gerald, Mooney, Cara, Robson, Stephen C, Wailoo, Allan
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: England Elsevier Ltd 04.02.2017
Elsevier Limited
Témata:
ISSN:0140-6736, 1474-547X, 1474-547X
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Abstract In-utero MRI (iuMRI) has shown promise as an adjunct to ultrasound but the comparative diagnostic performance has been poorly defined. We aimed to assess whether the diagnostic accuracy and confidence of the prenatal diagnosis of fetal brain abnormalities is improved with iuMRI and assess the clinical impact and patient acceptability of iuMRI. We did a multicentre, prospective, cohort study in the UK, at 16 fetal medicine centres, of pregnant women aged 16 years or older whose fetus had a brain abnormality detected by ultrasound at a gestational age of 18 weeks or more, had no contraindications to iuMRI, and consented to enter the study. Women carrying a fetus suspected of having a brain anomaly on ultrasound had iuMRI done within 14 days of ultrasound. The findings were reviewed by two independent panels and used to estimate diagnostic accuracy and confidence by comparison with outcome diagnoses. Changes in diagnosis, prognosis, and clinical management brought about by iuMRI and patient acceptability were assessed. Participants were recruited between July 29, 2011, and Aug 31, 2014. The cohort was subdivided by gestation into the 18 weeks to less than 24 weeks fetus cohort (n=369) and into the 24 weeks or older fetus cohort (n=201). Diagnostic accuracy was improved by 23% (95% CI 18–27) in the 18 weeks to less than 24 weeks group and 29% (23–36) in the 24 weeks and older group (p<0·0001 for both groups). The overall diagnostic accuracy was 68% for ultrasound and 93% for iuMRI (difference 25%, 95% CI 21–29). Dominant diagnoses were reported with high confidence on ultrasound in 465 (82%) of 570 cases compared with 544 (95%) of 570 cases on iuMRI. IuMRI provided additional diagnostic information in 387 (49%) of 783 cases, changed prognostic information in at least 157 (20%), and led to changes in clinical management in more than one in three cases. IuMRI also had high patient acceptability with at least 95% of women saying they would have an iuMRI study if a future pregnancy were complicated by a fetal brain abnormality. iuMRI improves diagnostic accuracy and confidence for fetal brain anomalies and leads to management changes in a high proportion of cases. This finding, along with the high patient acceptability, leads us to propose that any fetus with a suspected brain abnormality on ultrasound should have iuMRI to better inform counselling and management decisions. National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.
AbstractList In-utero MRI (iuMRI) has shown promise as an adjunct to ultrasound but the comparative diagnostic performance has been poorly defined. We aimed to assess whether the diagnostic accuracy and confidence of the prenatal diagnosis of fetal brain abnormalities is improved with iuMRI and assess the clinical impact and patient acceptability of iuMRI.BACKGROUNDIn-utero MRI (iuMRI) has shown promise as an adjunct to ultrasound but the comparative diagnostic performance has been poorly defined. We aimed to assess whether the diagnostic accuracy and confidence of the prenatal diagnosis of fetal brain abnormalities is improved with iuMRI and assess the clinical impact and patient acceptability of iuMRI.We did a multicentre, prospective, cohort study in the UK, at 16 fetal medicine centres, of pregnant women aged 16 years or older whose fetus had a brain abnormality detected by ultrasound at a gestational age of 18 weeks or more, had no contraindications to iuMRI, and consented to enter the study. Women carrying a fetus suspected of having a brain anomaly on ultrasound had iuMRI done within 14 days of ultrasound. The findings were reviewed by two independent panels and used to estimate diagnostic accuracy and confidence by comparison with outcome diagnoses. Changes in diagnosis, prognosis, and clinical management brought about by iuMRI and patient acceptability were assessed.METHODSWe did a multicentre, prospective, cohort study in the UK, at 16 fetal medicine centres, of pregnant women aged 16 years or older whose fetus had a brain abnormality detected by ultrasound at a gestational age of 18 weeks or more, had no contraindications to iuMRI, and consented to enter the study. Women carrying a fetus suspected of having a brain anomaly on ultrasound had iuMRI done within 14 days of ultrasound. The findings were reviewed by two independent panels and used to estimate diagnostic accuracy and confidence by comparison with outcome diagnoses. Changes in diagnosis, prognosis, and clinical management brought about by iuMRI and patient acceptability were assessed.Participants were recruited between July 29, 2011, and Aug 31, 2014. The cohort was subdivided by gestation into the 18 weeks to less than 24 weeks fetus cohort (n=369) and into the 24 weeks or older fetus cohort (n=201). Diagnostic accuracy was improved by 23% (95% CI 18-27) in the 18 weeks to less than 24 weeks group and 29% (23-36) in the 24 weeks and older group (p<0·0001 for both groups). The overall diagnostic accuracy was 68% for ultrasound and 93% for iuMRI (difference 25%, 95% CI 21-29). Dominant diagnoses were reported with high confidence on ultrasound in 465 (82%) of 570 cases compared with 544 (95%) of 570 cases on iuMRI. IuMRI provided additional diagnostic information in 387 (49%) of 783 cases, changed prognostic information in at least 157 (20%), and led to changes in clinical management in more than one in three cases. IuMRI also had high patient acceptability with at least 95% of women saying they would have an iuMRI study if a future pregnancy were complicated by a fetal brain abnormality.FINDINGSParticipants were recruited between July 29, 2011, and Aug 31, 2014. The cohort was subdivided by gestation into the 18 weeks to less than 24 weeks fetus cohort (n=369) and into the 24 weeks or older fetus cohort (n=201). Diagnostic accuracy was improved by 23% (95% CI 18-27) in the 18 weeks to less than 24 weeks group and 29% (23-36) in the 24 weeks and older group (p<0·0001 for both groups). The overall diagnostic accuracy was 68% for ultrasound and 93% for iuMRI (difference 25%, 95% CI 21-29). Dominant diagnoses were reported with high confidence on ultrasound in 465 (82%) of 570 cases compared with 544 (95%) of 570 cases on iuMRI. IuMRI provided additional diagnostic information in 387 (49%) of 783 cases, changed prognostic information in at least 157 (20%), and led to changes in clinical management in more than one in three cases. IuMRI also had high patient acceptability with at least 95% of women saying they would have an iuMRI study if a future pregnancy were complicated by a fetal brain abnormality.iuMRI improves diagnostic accuracy and confidence for fetal brain anomalies and leads to management changes in a high proportion of cases. This finding, along with the high patient acceptability, leads us to propose that any fetus with a suspected brain abnormality on ultrasound should have iuMRI to better inform counselling and management decisions.INTERPRETATIONiuMRI improves diagnostic accuracy and confidence for fetal brain anomalies and leads to management changes in a high proportion of cases. This finding, along with the high patient acceptability, leads us to propose that any fetus with a suspected brain abnormality on ultrasound should have iuMRI to better inform counselling and management decisions.National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.FUNDINGNational Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.
In-utero MRI (iuMRI) has shown promise as an adjunct to ultrasound but the comparative diagnostic performance has been poorly defined. We aimed to assess whether the diagnostic accuracy and confidence of the prenatal diagnosis of fetal brain abnormalities is improved with iuMRI and assess the clinical impact and patient acceptability of iuMRI. We did a multicentre, prospective, cohort study in the UK, at 16 fetal medicine centres, of pregnant women aged 16 years or older whose fetus had a brain abnormality detected by ultrasound at a gestational age of 18 weeks or more, had no contraindications to iuMRI, and consented to enter the study. Women carrying a fetus suspected of having a brain anomaly on ultrasound had iuMRI done within 14 days of ultrasound. The findings were reviewed by two independent panels and used to estimate diagnostic accuracy and confidence by comparison with outcome diagnoses. Changes in diagnosis, prognosis, and clinical management brought about by iuMRI and patient acceptability were assessed. Participants were recruited between July 29, 2011, and Aug 31, 2014. The cohort was subdivided by gestation into the 18 weeks to less than 24 weeks fetus cohort (n=369) and into the 24 weeks or older fetus cohort (n=201). Diagnostic accuracy was improved by 23% (95% CI 18–27) in the 18 weeks to less than 24 weeks group and 29% (23–36) in the 24 weeks and older group (p<0·0001 for both groups). The overall diagnostic accuracy was 68% for ultrasound and 93% for iuMRI (difference 25%, 95% CI 21–29). Dominant diagnoses were reported with high confidence on ultrasound in 465 (82%) of 570 cases compared with 544 (95%) of 570 cases on iuMRI. IuMRI provided additional diagnostic information in 387 (49%) of 783 cases, changed prognostic information in at least 157 (20%), and led to changes in clinical management in more than one in three cases. IuMRI also had high patient acceptability with at least 95% of women saying they would have an iuMRI study if a future pregnancy were complicated by a fetal brain abnormality. iuMRI improves diagnostic accuracy and confidence for fetal brain anomalies and leads to management changes in a high proportion of cases. This finding, along with the high patient acceptability, leads us to propose that any fetus with a suspected brain abnormality on ultrasound should have iuMRI to better inform counselling and management decisions. National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.
Summary Background In-utero MRI (iuMRI) has shown promise as an adjunct to ultrasound but the comparative diagnostic performance has been poorly defined. We aimed to assess whether the diagnostic accuracy and confidence of the prenatal diagnosis of fetal brain abnormalities is improved with iuMRI and assess the clinical impact and patient acceptability of iuMRI. Methods We did a multicentre, prospective, cohort study in the UK, at 16 fetal medicine centres, of pregnant women aged 16 years or older whose fetus had a brain abnormality detected by ultrasound at a gestational age of 18 weeks or more, had no contraindications to iuMRI, and consented to enter the study. Women carrying a fetus suspected of having a brain anomaly on ultrasound had iuMRI done within 14 days of ultrasound. The findings were reviewed by two independent panels and used to estimate diagnostic accuracy and confidence by comparison with outcome diagnoses. Changes in diagnosis, prognosis, and clinical management brought about by iuMRI and patient acceptability were assessed. Findings Participants were recruited between July 29, 2011, and Aug 31, 2014. The cohort was subdivided by gestation into the 18 weeks to less than 24 weeks fetus cohort (n=369) and into the 24 weeks or older fetus cohort (n=201). Diagnostic accuracy was improved by 23% (95% CI 18–27) in the 18 weeks to less than 24 weeks group and 29% (23–36) in the 24 weeks and older group (p<0·0001 for both groups). The overall diagnostic accuracy was 68% for ultrasound and 93% for iuMRI (difference 25%, 95% CI 21–29). Dominant diagnoses were reported with high confidence on ultrasound in 465 (82%) of 570 cases compared with 544 (95%) of 570 cases on iuMRI. IuMRI provided additional diagnostic information in 387 (49%) of 783 cases, changed prognostic information in at least 157 (20%), and led to changes in clinical management in more than one in three cases. IuMRI also had high patient acceptability with at least 95% of women saying they would have an iuMRI study if a future pregnancy were complicated by a fetal brain abnormality. Interpretation iuMRI improves diagnostic accuracy and confidence for fetal brain anomalies and leads to management changes in a high proportion of cases. This finding, along with the high patient acceptability, leads us to propose that any fetus with a suspected brain abnormality on ultrasound should have iuMRI to better inform counselling and management decisions. Funding National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.
Background In-utero MRI (iuMRI) has shown promise as an adjunct to ultrasound but the comparative diagnostic performance has been poorly defined. We aimed to assess whether the diagnostic accuracy and confidence of the prenatal diagnosis of fetal brain abnormalities is improved with iuMRI and assess the clinical impact and patient acceptability of iuMRI. Methods We did a multicentre, prospective, cohort study in the UK, at 16 fetal medicine centres, of pregnant women aged 16 years or older whose fetus had a brain abnormality detected by ultrasound at a gestational age of 18 weeks or more, had no contraindications to iuMRI, and consented to enter the study. Women carrying a fetus suspected of having a brain anomaly on ultrasound had iuMRI done within 14 days of ultrasound. The findings were reviewed by two independent panels and used to estimate diagnostic accuracy and confidence by comparison with outcome diagnoses. Changes in diagnosis, prognosis, and clinical management brought about by iuMRI and patient acceptability were assessed. Findings Participants were recruited between July 29, 2011, and Aug 31, 2014. The cohort was subdivided by gestation into the 18 weeks to less than 24 weeks fetus cohort (n=369) and into the 24 weeks or older fetus cohort (n=201). Diagnostic accuracy was improved by 23% (95% CI 18-27) in the 18 weeks to less than 24 weeks group and 29% (23-36) in the 24 weeks and older group (p<0.0001 for both groups). The overall diagnostic accuracy was 68% for ultrasound and 93% for iuMRI (difference 25%, 95% CI 21-29). Dominant diagnoses were reported with high confidence on ultrasound in 465 (82%) of 570 cases compared with 544 (95%) of 570 cases on iuMRI. IuMRI provided additional diagnostic information in 387 (49%) of 783 cases, changed prognostic information in at least 157 (20%), and led to changes in clinical management in more than one in three cases. IuMRI also had high patient acceptability with at least 95% of women saying they would have an iuMRI study if a future pregnancy were complicated by a fetal brain abnormality. Interpretation iuMRI improves diagnostic accuracy and confidence for fetal brain anomalies and leads to management changes in a high proportion of cases. This finding, along with the high patient acceptability, leads us to propose that any fetus with a suspected brain abnormality on ultrasound should have iuMRI to better inform counselling and management decisions. Funding National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.
In-utero MRI (iuMRI) has shown promise as an adjunct to ultrasound but the comparative diagnostic performance has been poorly defined. We aimed to assess whether the diagnostic accuracy and confidence of the prenatal diagnosis of fetal brain abnormalities is improved with iuMRI and assess the clinical impact and patient acceptability of iuMRI. Methods We did a multicentre, prospective, cohort study in the UK, at 16 fetal medicine centres, of pregnant women aged 16 years or older whose fetus had a brain abnormality detected by ultrasound at a gestational age of 18 weeks or more, had no contraindications to iuMRI, and consented to enter the study. Women carrying a fetus suspected of having a brain anomaly on ultrasound had iuMRI done within 14 days of ultrasound. The findings were reviewed by two independent panels and used to estimate diagnostic accuracy and confidence by comparison with outcome diagnoses. Changes in diagnosis, prognosis, and clinical management brought about by iuMRI and patient acceptability were assessed. Findings Participants were recruited between July 29, 2011, and Aug 31, 2014. The cohort was subdivided by gestation into the 18 weeks to less than 24 weeks fetus cohort (n=369) and into the 24 weeks or older fetus cohort (n=201). Diagnostic accuracy was improved by 23% (95% CI 18-27) in the 18 weeks to less than 24 weeks group and 29% (23-36) in the 24 weeks and older group (p<0·0001 for both groups). The overall diagnostic accuracy was 68% for ultrasound and 93% for iuMRI (difference 25%, 95% CI 21-29). Dominant diagnoses were reported with high confidence on ultrasound in 465 (82%) of 570 cases compared with 544 (95%) of 570 cases on iuMRI. IuMRI provided additional diagnostic information in 387 (49%) of 783 cases, changed prognostic information in at least 157 (20%), and led to changes in clinical management in more than one in three cases. IuMRI also had high patient acceptability with at least 95% of women saying they would have an iuMRI study if a future pregnancy were complicated by a fetal brain abnormality. Interpretation iuMRI improves diagnostic accuracy and confidence for fetal brain anomalies and leads to management changes in a high proportion of cases. This finding, along with the high patient acceptability, leads us to propose that any fetus with a suspected brain abnormality on ultrasound should have iuMRI to better inform counselling and management decisions. Funding National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.
Author Griffiths, Paul D
Campbell, Michael J
Kilby, Mark D
Robson, Stephen C
Cooper, Cindy L
Mason, Gerald
Graham, Ruth
Jarvis, Deborah
Mooney, Cara
Bradburn, Michael
Wailoo, Allan
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Paul D
  surname: Griffiths
  fullname: Griffiths, Paul D
  organization: Academic Unit of Radiology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Michael
  surname: Bradburn
  fullname: Bradburn, Michael
  organization: Clinical Trials Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Michael J
  surname: Campbell
  fullname: Campbell, Michael J
  organization: Clinical Trials Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Cindy L
  surname: Cooper
  fullname: Cooper, Cindy L
  organization: Clinical Trials Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Ruth
  surname: Graham
  fullname: Graham, Ruth
  organization: Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Deborah
  surname: Jarvis
  fullname: Jarvis, Deborah
  organization: Academic Unit of Radiology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Mark D
  surname: Kilby
  fullname: Kilby, Mark D
  organization: Centre for Women's and Newborn Health, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Gerald
  surname: Mason
  fullname: Mason, Gerald
  organization: Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Cara
  surname: Mooney
  fullname: Mooney, Cara
  email: c.d.mooney@sheffield.ac.uk
  organization: Clinical Trials Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
– sequence: 10
  givenname: Stephen C
  surname: Robson
  fullname: Robson, Stephen C
  organization: Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
– sequence: 11
  givenname: Allan
  surname: Wailoo
  fullname: Wailoo, Allan
  organization: Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27988140$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqNkmFrFDEQhoNU7LX6E5SAX67garLZJLuKSqlVD1qFasFvIZudtam7mzPJFu7fm72rFQ70_JKQzDNvJvPOAdob3AAIPabkOSVUvPhCaEEyIZmYU3HEqMxZVt5DM1rIIuOF_LaHZnfIPjoI4ZoQUgjCH6D9XFZlmYIzNF4GwK7F5xcLbAccrwA3Vn8fXLBhum8h6g7XXqegrgfne93ZaCFM9BjBOzw_P71YvFscfzp6iTXuxy5aA0P08AwvvQtLMNHeADbuyvmIQxyb1UN0v9VdgEe3-yG6fH_69eRjdvb5w-Lk-CwzgpKY1UIbWWoiSlEQ2eTAdd3qWghuTENbYJwR2RatpFXDdAUtY9Q0hEotKtZyzg7RfKObCvk5Qoiqt8FA1-kB3BgULUXJWEnTshvlNK-E5DKhT7fQazf6IX1E5cmIkstKiH9R6VmeMylymqgnt9RY99Copbe99iv126EE8A1gUi-Dh_YOoURNk6DWk6Amm1U6rSdBlSnv1VaesVFH65Iz2nY7s99usiG5c2PBq2AsDAYa65OfqnF2p8KbLQXT2cEa3f2AFYQ_vVAhV2QjMmlQsVaYBF7_XeA_CvgFetfxxw
CODEN LANCAO
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1038_s41372_019_0407_9
crossref_primary_10_1002_uog_23581
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pnpbp_2021_110277
crossref_primary_10_1097_GRF_0000000000000307
crossref_primary_10_1136_archdischild_2024_328310
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_023_43867_4
crossref_primary_10_1002_pd_5722
crossref_primary_10_1002_mgg3_70016
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00234_020_02364_5
crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm12010058
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00429_021_02303_x
crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000036623
crossref_primary_10_1002_pd_5042
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41390_025_04000_5
crossref_primary_10_3390_diagnostics15020208
crossref_primary_10_1002_pd_5399
crossref_primary_10_1111_dmcn_15528
crossref_primary_10_3389_fnins_2022_886083
crossref_primary_10_1002_uog_21943
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_022_09173_9
crossref_primary_10_1159_000512534
crossref_primary_10_1080_14767058_2025_2521796
crossref_primary_10_1002_uog_17485
crossref_primary_10_1002_uog_22155
crossref_primary_10_1159_000496202
crossref_primary_10_1136_archdischild_2021_321984
crossref_primary_10_1111_tog_12740
crossref_primary_10_1002_uog_29310
crossref_primary_10_1080_14767058_2018_1480605
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00247_018_4261_2
crossref_primary_10_3171_2022_4_PEDS2269
crossref_primary_10_1002_jmri_26316
crossref_primary_10_1002_jmri_27526
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajog_2018_04_039
crossref_primary_10_1002_uog_17475
crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm14196690
crossref_primary_10_1002_uog_21974
crossref_primary_10_1002_uog_22145
crossref_primary_10_2967_jnumed_116_184028
crossref_primary_10_1111_aogs_13687
crossref_primary_10_1080_15513815_2025_2529888
crossref_primary_10_1002_jmri_29140
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2020_117316
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mric_2024_02_008
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00234_019_02218_9
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00234_023_03193_y
crossref_primary_10_1136_archdischild_2018_316733
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00234_019_02184_2
crossref_primary_10_3390_genes13091517
crossref_primary_10_1111_dmcn_16301
crossref_primary_10_1007_s42058_021_00082_2
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_crad_2017_09_007
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_020_07125_9
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nic_2019_03_001
crossref_primary_10_1177_20584601241248820
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pediatrneurol_2023_02_013
crossref_primary_10_23736_S2724_606X_24_05641_0
crossref_primary_10_1002_jmri_29057
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gim_2023_100915
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_siny_2024_101555
crossref_primary_10_1136_archdischild_2023_326747
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12880_024_01286_5
crossref_primary_10_3390_diagnostics10010027
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00381_020_04633_3
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejogrb_2020_04_032
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejpn_2018_08_007
crossref_primary_10_3390_biomedicines12122929
crossref_primary_10_1111_1471_0528_16533
crossref_primary_10_1080_14767058_2017_1342801
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neubiorev_2018_06_001
crossref_primary_10_1093_brain_awaf094
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejogrb_2018_05_044
crossref_primary_10_1002_pd_5591
crossref_primary_10_1159_000516378
crossref_primary_10_3390_children11091094
crossref_primary_10_3390_diagnostics15101295
crossref_primary_10_3174_ajnr_A8742
crossref_primary_10_3390_diagnostics12030764
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jksuci_2023_101647
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_020_06899_2
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pediatrneurol_2025_05_014
crossref_primary_10_1002_pd_5229
crossref_primary_10_3390_diagnostics14222535
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0140_6736_18_32490_5
crossref_primary_10_1136_archdischild_2019_317517
crossref_primary_10_3390_brainsci9090231
crossref_primary_10_1002_uog_26301
crossref_primary_10_1017_S0954579420000218
crossref_primary_10_1111_dmcn_16071
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nicl_2023_103357
crossref_primary_10_1002_pd_5579
crossref_primary_10_1002_pd_5210
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_siny_2024_101525
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_018_5508_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gofs_2024_07_005
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mric_2021_06_007
crossref_primary_10_1097_GRF_0000000000000820
crossref_primary_10_1002_uog_20111
crossref_primary_10_1002_uog_17502
crossref_primary_10_1111_dmcn_14160
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_yacr_2019_05_003
crossref_primary_10_3390_children10061015
crossref_primary_10_3390_jimaging7100200
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tjog_2024_07_020
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajogmf_2023_101198
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_crad_2020_03_035
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_patcog_2022_109029
crossref_primary_10_1111_1471_0528_15530
crossref_primary_10_1002_mrm_30094
crossref_primary_10_1002_uog_23612
crossref_primary_10_1002_jum_15313
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_crad_2019_03_010
crossref_primary_10_1891_0730_0832_37_6_358
crossref_primary_10_3174_ajnr_A8728
crossref_primary_10_1111_1471_0528_16609
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ccr_2021_214068
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nic_2022_04_009
crossref_primary_10_1002_pd_5558
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejogrb_2025_01_027
crossref_primary_10_2147_CLEP_S256297
crossref_primary_10_1002_pd_5674
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00247_017_3982_y
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clp_2022_05_001
crossref_primary_10_3389_fped_2024_1354475
crossref_primary_10_1177_03000605241301879
crossref_primary_10_1148_radiol_2019181976
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejogrb_2025_01_020
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pediatrneurol_2025_01_022
crossref_primary_10_1002_uog_24856
crossref_primary_10_1002_uog_23762
crossref_primary_10_1002_uog_24853
crossref_primary_10_1111_dmcn_14260
crossref_primary_10_1002_acn3_51484
crossref_primary_10_1259_bjr_20220071
crossref_primary_10_18621_eurj_899462
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_media_2023_102793
crossref_primary_10_3390_genes12101598
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00247_020_04696_z
crossref_primary_10_1093_cercor_bhab030
crossref_primary_10_1136_archdischild_2025_328547
crossref_primary_10_1177_87564793231167429
crossref_primary_10_1186_s42492_025_00197_8
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_020_07452_x
crossref_primary_10_1177_2329048X231157147
crossref_primary_10_1002_pd_5416
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41372_017_0040_4
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00247_019_04537_8
crossref_primary_10_1080_14767058_2017_1338258
crossref_primary_10_1002_pd_5096
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_018_5938_5
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12880_022_00929_9
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00234_023_03242_6
crossref_primary_10_1080_14767058_2021_1910657
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00381_017_3595_7
crossref_primary_10_1177_1049732318764390
crossref_primary_10_1159_000488674
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpeds_2019_01_051
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00247_021_05137_1
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajogmf_2021_100501
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pediatrneurol_2023_04_016
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pediatrneurol_2024_12_014
crossref_primary_10_1007_s43441_022_00433_w
crossref_primary_10_1002_uog_17538
crossref_primary_10_1111_aogs_14711
crossref_primary_10_1007_s13312_023_3007_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_artmed_2023_102608
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_022_05468_5
crossref_primary_10_1002_pd_5874
crossref_primary_10_1002_mrm_29106
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_crad_2019_02_017
crossref_primary_10_1002_uog_29309
crossref_primary_10_1002_jcu_23157
crossref_primary_10_1002_jcu_23158
crossref_primary_10_12968_hmed_2017_78_3_128
crossref_primary_10_1080_07853890_2021_1969590
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejrad_2020_109369
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13293_023_00497_9
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12880_020_00525_9
crossref_primary_10_1212_NXG_0000000000200171
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0140_6736_17_31337_5
crossref_primary_10_1002_ijgo_16079
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejogrb_2020_05_013
crossref_primary_10_1148_radiol_2018171267
crossref_primary_10_3389_fneur_2024_1358741
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajog_2018_11_1088
crossref_primary_10_1002_jum_15626
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41372_018_0208_6
crossref_primary_10_1111_dmcn_15022
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mric_2024_03_004
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pediatrneurol_2025_02_009
crossref_primary_10_1002_uog_22102
crossref_primary_10_3390_diagnostics11091723
crossref_primary_10_1016_S2352_4642_19_30387_6
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00381_019_04384_w
crossref_primary_10_1111_dmcn_16471
crossref_primary_10_1016_S2352_4642_19_30349_9
crossref_primary_10_1109_TMI_2022_3208277
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12021_023_09635_5
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mjafi_2021_12_002
crossref_primary_10_1002_ana_27072
crossref_primary_10_1111_1471_0528_15620
crossref_primary_10_1002_ccr3_9684
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejpn_2020_08_009
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_018_5878_0
Cites_doi 10.1136/adc.67.7_Spec_No.770
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.02.045
10.1136/bmj.37939.570104.EE
10.1016/j.mri.2004.01.047
10.1515/JPM.2008.005
10.1148/radiol.10092366
10.1002/pd.1710
10.1002/uog.13429
10.1259/bjr/64096611
10.1046/j.1469-0705.2000.00199.x
10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00660.x
10.3109/14767058.2015.1109621
10.1007/s100249900101
10.1080/00016340600880886
10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70577-6
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2017 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY license
The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY license
Copyright © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Copyright Elsevier Limited Feb 4, 2017
2017. The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY license.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2017 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY license
– notice: The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY license
– notice: Copyright © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
– notice: Copyright Elsevier Limited Feb 4, 2017
– notice: 2017. The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY license.
CorporateAuthor MERIDIAN collaborative group
CorporateAuthor_xml – name: MERIDIAN collaborative group
DBID 6I.
AAFTH
AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
3V.
7QL
7QP
7RV
7TK
7U7
7U9
7X7
7XB
88A
88C
88E
88G
88I
8AF
8AO
8C1
8C2
8FE
8FH
8FI
8FJ
8FK
8G5
ABUWG
AEUYN
AFKRA
AN0
ASE
AZQEC
BBNVY
BEC
BENPR
BHPHI
C1K
CCPQU
DWQXO
FPQ
FYUFA
GHDGH
GNUQQ
GUQSH
H94
HCIFZ
K6X
K9-
K9.
KB0
KB~
LK8
M0R
M0S
M0T
M1P
M2M
M2O
M2P
M7N
M7P
MBDVC
NAPCQ
PHGZM
PHGZT
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQGLB
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
PSYQQ
Q9U
S0X
7X8
DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31723-8
DatabaseName ScienceDirect Open Access Titles
Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access
CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)
Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts
Nursing & Allied Health Database
Neurosciences Abstracts
Toxicology Abstracts
Virology and AIDS Abstracts
ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Biology Database (Alumni Edition)
Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
Psychology Database (Alumni)
Science Database (Alumni Edition)
STEM Database
ProQuest Pharma Collection
Public Health Database
Lancet Titles
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Natural Science Journals
Hospital Premium Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Research Library
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest One Sustainability
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
British Nursing Database
British Nursing Index
ProQuest Central Essentials - QC
Biological Science Collection
eLibrary
ProQuest Central
Natural Science Collection
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Central Korea
British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central Student
ProQuest Research Library
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
SciTech Premium Collection
British Nursing Index
Consumer Health Database (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Newsstand Professional
Biological Sciences
Consumer Health Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
Healthcare Administration Database
Medical Database
Psychology Database
Research Library
Science Database
Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)
Biological Science Database
Research Library (Corporate)
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest One Academic (retired)
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest One Psychology
ProQuest Central Basic
SIRS Editorial
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
ProQuest One Psychology
Research Library Prep
ProQuest Central Student
ProQuest Central Essentials
Lancet Titles
elibrary
ProQuest AP Science
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest Central China
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest One Sustainability
Health Research Premium Collection
Natural Science Collection
Health & Medical Research Collection
Biological Science Collection
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
ProQuest Newsstand Professional
Virology and AIDS Abstracts
ProQuest Science Journals (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Biological Science Collection
ProQuest Family Health
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
Biological Science Database
Neurosciences Abstracts
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Health Management (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source (Alumni)
ProQuest One Academic
Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
SIRS Editorial
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
Research Library (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Pharma Collection
ProQuest Family Health (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Biology Journals (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central Korea
Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)
Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
ProQuest Research Library
ProQuest Public Health
ProQuest Central Basic
Toxicology Abstracts
ProQuest Science Journals
British Nursing Index with Full Text
ProQuest Health Management
British Nursing Index
ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source
ProQuest Psychology Journals (Alumni)
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Medical Library
ProQuest Psychology Journals
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic

ProQuest One Psychology
Neurosciences Abstracts
ProQuest One Psychology
MEDLINE


Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: https://www.proquest.com/central
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1474-547X
EndPage 546
ExternalDocumentID 4312279621
27988140
10_1016_S0140_6736_16_31723_8
S0140673616317238
1_s2_0_S0140673616317238
Genre Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
GeographicLocations United Kingdom--UK
GeographicLocations_xml – name: United Kingdom--UK
GrantInformation National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.
GroupedDBID ---
--K
--M
.1-
.55
.CO
.FO
0R~
123
1B1
1P~
1RT
1~5
29L
4.4
457
4G.
53G
5VS
7-5
71M
7RV
7X7
88E
88I
8AF
8AO
8C1
8C2
8FE
8FH
8FI
8FJ
8G5
9JM
AABNK
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAFWJ
AAIKJ
AAKOC
AALRI
AAMRU
AAQFI
AAQQT
AATTM
AAXKI
AAXUO
AAYWO
ABBQC
ABCQX
ABFNM
ABIVO
ABJNI
ABLJU
ABMAC
ABMZM
ABOCM
ABUFD
ABUWG
ACGFS
ACGOD
ACIEU
ACIUM
ACLOT
ACPRK
ACRLP
ACVFH
ADBBV
ADCNI
AEIPS
AEKER
AENEX
AEUPX
AEUYN
AEVXI
AFKRA
AFPUW
AFRAH
AFRHN
AFTJW
AFXIZ
AGAPS
AGHFR
AHMBA
AIIUN
AITUG
AJRQY
AJUYK
AKBMS
AKRWK
AKYEP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMRAJ
AN0
ANZVX
APXCP
AQUVI
AXJTR
AZQEC
BBNVY
BCU
BEC
BENPR
BHPHI
BKEYQ
BKNYI
BKOJK
BKOMP
BNPGV
BNQBC
BPHCQ
BVXVI
CCPQU
CS3
DU5
DWQXO
EAU
EBS
EFJIC
EFKBS
EJD
EO8
EO9
EP2
EP3
EWM
EX3
F5P
FD8
FDB
FIRID
FNPLU
FYGXN
FYUFA
G-2
G-Q
GBLVA
GNUQQ
GUQSH
HCIFZ
HMCUK
IHE
J1W
K-O
K9-
KOM
L7B
LK8
LZ2
M0R
M0T
M1P
M2M
M2O
M2P
M7P
MJL
MO0
N9A
NAPCQ
O-L
O9-
OD.
OO~
OZT
P-8
P-9
P2P
PC.
PHGZM
PHGZT
PJZUB
PPXIY
PQGLB
PQQKQ
PRG
PROAC
PSQYO
PSYQQ
R2-
ROL
RPZ
S0X
SAD
SDG
SEL
SES
SJFOW
SJN
SPCBC
SSH
SSZ
T5K
TLN
TWZ
UAP
UBE
UKHRP
UV1
WOW
X7M
XAX
XDU
YYM
Z5R
ZMT
~HD
.GJ
04C
3EH
3O-
3V.
41~
88A
8WZ
A6W
AACTN
AAEJM
AAKAS
AAQXK
AAYOK
ABDBF
ABTAH
ABWVN
ACRPL
ACRZS
ACUHS
ADMUD
ADNMO
ADZCM
AFCTW
AFFNX
AFKWA
AHHHB
AHQJS
AJJEV
AJOXV
AKVCP
ALIPV
AMFUW
ARTTT
ASPBG
AVWKF
AZFZN
D0S
EAP
EAS
EAZ
EBC
EBD
EBU
EGS
EHN
EIHBH
EMB
EMK
EMOBN
ENC
EPL
EPS
EPT
ESX
EVS
FEDTE
FGOYB
HVGLF
HZ~
J5H
M0L
M41
MVM
OVD
PKN
Q~Q
RIG
SDF
SV3
TEORI
TH9
UHU
UQL
WOQ
WUQ
XPP
YYQ
ZGI
ZXP
ZY4
~G0
6I.
AAFTH
ABLVK
ABYKQ
AHPSJ
AJBFU
XFK
ZA5
9DU
AAYXX
ADXHL
AFFHD
AGQPQ
AIGII
CITATION
AGCQF
AGRNS
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7QL
7QP
7TK
7U7
7U9
7XB
8FK
ASE
C1K
FPQ
H94
K6X
K9.
KB~
M7N
MBDVC
PKEHL
PQEST
PQUKI
PRINS
Q9U
7X8
PUEGO
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c610t-b6ac78a0686407d2e5abfab665ccd1fe35307f4f719d3a9ef331cd017a693f553
IEDL.DBID M7P
ISICitedReferencesCount 248
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000393283400036&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 0140-6736
1474-547X
IngestDate Sun Sep 28 06:09:49 EDT 2025
Sun Sep 28 10:43:07 EDT 2025
Tue Oct 07 07:36:12 EDT 2025
Tue Oct 07 06:47:50 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 06:05:56 EDT 2025
Sat Nov 29 05:12:46 EST 2025
Tue Nov 18 22:41:08 EST 2025
Fri Feb 23 02:32:32 EST 2024
Tue Feb 25 20:10:34 EST 2025
Tue Oct 14 19:40:38 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 10068
Language English
License This is an open access article under the CC BY license.
Copyright © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c610t-b6ac78a0686407d2e5abfab665ccd1fe35307f4f719d3a9ef331cd017a693f553
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S0140673616317238
PMID 27988140
PQID 1865237621
PQPubID 40246
PageCount 9
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1868338183
proquest_miscellaneous_1851296757
proquest_journals_2317857966
proquest_journals_1865237621
pubmed_primary_27988140
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0140_6736_16_31723_8
crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_S0140_6736_16_31723_8
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_S0140_6736_16_31723_8
elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S0140673616317238
elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_S0140_6736_16_31723_8
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2017-02-04
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2017-02-04
PublicationDate_xml – month: 02
  year: 2017
  text: 2017-02-04
  day: 04
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
– name: London
PublicationTitle The Lancet (British edition)
PublicationTitleAlternate Lancet
PublicationYear 2017
Publisher Elsevier Ltd
Elsevier Limited
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier Ltd
– name: Elsevier Limited
References Congenital anomalies.
Kok, de Vries, Heerschap, van den Berg (bib21) 2004; 22
(bib15) 1992; 67
Richmond, Atkins (bib14) 2005; 112
Rossi, Prefumo (bib4) 2014; 44
(bib18) 2010
Likert (bib16) 1932; 22
Sun, Grumbach, DeCosta, Meyers, Dungan (bib8) 1999; 2
Ng, Palmer (bib17) 2007; 80
Reeves, Brandreth, Whitby (bib20) 2010; 257
(accessed Nov 10, 2016).
Carroll, Porter, Abdel-Fattah, Kyle, Soothill (bib7) 2000; 16
Akgun, Basbug, Ozgun (bib9) 2007; 27
Antonsson, Sundberg, Kublickas (bib6) 2008; 36
Van Doorn, Oude Rengerink, Newsum, Reneman, Majoie, Pajkrt (bib5) 2015; 23
(bib19) 2008
bib1
Fadda, Capobianco, Balata (bib12) 2009; 144
Mundy, Hiller, Braunack-Mayer, Merlin (bib3) 2007
Boyd, Tondi, Hicks, Chamberlain (bib11) 2004; 328
Grandjean, Larroque, Levi (bib13) 1999; 181
Amini, Antonsson, Papadogiannakis (bib10) 2006; 85
Reeves (10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31723-8_bib20) 2010; 257
Likert (10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31723-8_bib16) 1932; 22
Ng (10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31723-8_bib17) 2007; 80
Carroll (10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31723-8_bib7) 2000; 16
10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31723-8_bib2
Sun (10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31723-8_bib8) 1999; 2
Amini (10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31723-8_bib10) 2006; 85
Boyd (10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31723-8_bib11) 2004; 328
Fadda (10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31723-8_bib12) 2009; 144
(10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31723-8_bib18) 2010
Grandjean (10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31723-8_bib13) 1999; 181
(10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31723-8_bib15) 1992; 67
Rossi (10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31723-8_bib4) 2014; 44
Van Doorn (10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31723-8_bib5) 2015; 23
Antonsson (10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31723-8_bib6) 2008; 36
Akgun (10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31723-8_bib9) 2007; 27
Richmond (10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31723-8_bib14) 2005; 112
(10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31723-8_bib19) 2008
Kok (10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31723-8_bib21) 2004; 22
Mundy (10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31723-8_bib3) 2007
28561003 - Lancet. 2017 May 27;389(10084):2103
31273009 - Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2020 Jan;105(1):109-110
27988139 - Lancet. 2017 Feb 4;389(10068):483-485
28568972 - Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Dec;50(6):679-680
References_xml – volume: 80
  start-page: 152
  year: 2007
  end-page: 160
  ident: bib17
  article-title: Analysis of diagnostic confidence and diagnostic accuracy: a unified framework
  publication-title: Br J Radiol
– volume: 85
  start-page: 1208
  year: 2006
  end-page: 1216
  ident: bib10
  article-title: Comparison of ultrasound and autopsy findings in pregnancies terminated due to fetal anomalies
  publication-title: Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand
– volume: 2
  start-page: 131
  year: 1999
  end-page: 142
  ident: bib8
  article-title: Correlation of prenatal ultrasound diagnosis and pathologic findings in fetal anomalies
  publication-title: Pediatr Dev Pathol
– volume: 328
  start-page: 137
  year: 2004
  ident: bib11
  article-title: Autopsy after termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly: retrospective cohort study
  publication-title: BMJ
– volume: 36
  start-page: 59
  year: 2008
  end-page: 69
  ident: bib6
  article-title: Correlation between ultrasound and autopsy findings after 2nd trimester terminations of pregnancy
  publication-title: J Perinat Med
– reference: (accessed Nov 10, 2016).
– year: 2007
  ident: bib3
  publication-title: MRI for the detection of foetal abnormalities
– volume: 27
  start-page: 457
  year: 2007
  end-page: 462
  ident: bib9
  article-title: Correlation between prenatal ultrasound and fetal autopsy findings in fetal anomalies terminated in the second trimester
  publication-title: Prenat Diagn
– volume: 181
  start-page: 446
  year: 1999
  end-page: 454
  ident: bib13
  article-title: The performance of routine ultrasonographic screening of pregnancies in the Eurofetus Study
  publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol
– volume: 112
  start-page: 1349
  year: 2005
  end-page: 1357
  ident: bib14
  article-title: A population-based study of the prenatal diagnosis of congenital malformation over 16 years
  publication-title: BJOG
– volume: 67
  start-page: 770
  year: 1992
  end-page: 774
  ident: bib15
  article-title: Fetal abnormality: an audit of its recognition and management
  publication-title: Arch Dis Child
– volume: 44
  start-page: 388
  year: 2014
  end-page: 393
  ident: bib4
  article-title: Additional value of fetal magnetic resonance imaging in the prenatal diagnosis of central nervous system anomalies: a systematic review of the literature
  publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
– volume: 22
  start-page: 1
  year: 1932
  end-page: 55
  ident: bib16
  article-title: A technique for the measurement of attitudes
  publication-title: Arch Psychol
– volume: 16
  start-page: 149
  year: 2000
  end-page: 153
  ident: bib7
  article-title: Correlation of prenatal ultrasound diagnosis and pathologic findings in fetal brain abnormalities
  publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
– volume: 144
  start-page: 110
  year: 2009
  end-page: 114
  ident: bib12
  article-title: Routine second trimester ultrasound screening for prenatal detection of fetal malformations in Sassari University Hospital, Italy: 23 years of experience in 42 256 pregnancies
  publication-title: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol
– year: 2008
  ident: bib19
  publication-title: Particular requirements for the safety of magnetic resonance equipment for medical diagnosis IEC 60601-2-33, edn 2.2, consolidated with amendments 1 and 2
– start-page: 10
  year: 2010
  ident: bib18
  publication-title: ACR-SPR Practice guideline for the safe and optimal performance of fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), resolution 13
– ident: bib1
  article-title: European anomaly registers
– reference: . Congenital anomalies.
– volume: 23
  start-page: 1
  year: 2015
  end-page: 13
  ident: bib5
  article-title: Added value of fetal MRI in foetuses with suspected brain abnormalities on neurosonography: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  publication-title: J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med
– volume: 257
  start-page: 802
  year: 2010
  end-page: 809
  ident: bib20
  article-title: Neonatal cochlear function: measurement after exposure to acoustic noise during in utero MR imaging
  publication-title: Radiology
– volume: 22
  start-page: 851
  year: 2004
  end-page: 854
  ident: bib21
  article-title: Absence of harmful effects of magnetic resonance exposure at 1.5 T in utero during the third trimester of pregnancy: a follow-up study
  publication-title: Magn Reson Imaging
– volume: 67
  start-page: 770
  year: 1992
  ident: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31723-8_bib15
  article-title: Fetal abnormality: an audit of its recognition and management
  publication-title: Arch Dis Child
  doi: 10.1136/adc.67.7_Spec_No.770
– volume: 144
  start-page: 110
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31723-8_bib12
  article-title: Routine second trimester ultrasound screening for prenatal detection of fetal malformations in Sassari University Hospital, Italy: 23 years of experience in 42 256 pregnancies
  publication-title: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.02.045
– start-page: 10
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31723-8_bib18
– volume: 328
  start-page: 137
  year: 2004
  ident: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31723-8_bib11
  article-title: Autopsy after termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly: retrospective cohort study
  publication-title: BMJ
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.37939.570104.EE
– volume: 22
  start-page: 851
  year: 2004
  ident: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31723-8_bib21
  article-title: Absence of harmful effects of magnetic resonance exposure at 1.5 T in utero during the third trimester of pregnancy: a follow-up study
  publication-title: Magn Reson Imaging
  doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2004.01.047
– volume: 36
  start-page: 59
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31723-8_bib6
  article-title: Correlation between ultrasound and autopsy findings after 2nd trimester terminations of pregnancy
  publication-title: J Perinat Med
  doi: 10.1515/JPM.2008.005
– volume: 257
  start-page: 802
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31723-8_bib20
  article-title: Neonatal cochlear function: measurement after exposure to acoustic noise during in utero MR imaging
  publication-title: Radiology
  doi: 10.1148/radiol.10092366
– volume: 27
  start-page: 457
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31723-8_bib9
  article-title: Correlation between prenatal ultrasound and fetal autopsy findings in fetal anomalies terminated in the second trimester
  publication-title: Prenat Diagn
  doi: 10.1002/pd.1710
– year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31723-8_bib3
– volume: 22
  start-page: 1
  year: 1932
  ident: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31723-8_bib16
  article-title: A technique for the measurement of attitudes
  publication-title: Arch Psychol
– volume: 44
  start-page: 388
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31723-8_bib4
  article-title: Additional value of fetal magnetic resonance imaging in the prenatal diagnosis of central nervous system anomalies: a systematic review of the literature
  publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1002/uog.13429
– volume: 80
  start-page: 152
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31723-8_bib17
  article-title: Analysis of diagnostic confidence and diagnostic accuracy: a unified framework
  publication-title: Br J Radiol
  doi: 10.1259/bjr/64096611
– ident: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31723-8_bib2
– volume: 16
  start-page: 149
  year: 2000
  ident: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31723-8_bib7
  article-title: Correlation of prenatal ultrasound diagnosis and pathologic findings in fetal brain abnormalities
  publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2000.00199.x
– volume: 112
  start-page: 1349
  year: 2005
  ident: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31723-8_bib14
  article-title: A population-based study of the prenatal diagnosis of congenital malformation over 16 years
  publication-title: BJOG
  doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00660.x
– volume: 23
  start-page: 1
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31723-8_bib5
  article-title: Added value of fetal MRI in foetuses with suspected brain abnormalities on neurosonography: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  publication-title: J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med
  doi: 10.3109/14767058.2015.1109621
– year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31723-8_bib19
– volume: 2
  start-page: 131
  year: 1999
  ident: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31723-8_bib8
  article-title: Correlation of prenatal ultrasound diagnosis and pathologic findings in fetal anomalies
  publication-title: Pediatr Dev Pathol
  doi: 10.1007/s100249900101
– volume: 85
  start-page: 1208
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31723-8_bib10
  article-title: Comparison of ultrasound and autopsy findings in pregnancies terminated due to fetal anomalies
  publication-title: Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand
  doi: 10.1080/00016340600880886
– volume: 181
  start-page: 446
  year: 1999
  ident: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31723-8_bib13
  article-title: The performance of routine ultrasonographic screening of pregnancies in the Eurofetus Study
  publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70577-6
– reference: 28561003 - Lancet. 2017 May 27;389(10084):2103
– reference: 31273009 - Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2020 Jan;105(1):109-110
– reference: 27988139 - Lancet. 2017 Feb 4;389(10068):483-485
– reference: 28568972 - Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Dec;50(6):679-680
SSID ssj0004605
Score 2.6319218
Snippet In-utero MRI (iuMRI) has shown promise as an adjunct to ultrasound but the comparative diagnostic performance has been poorly defined. We aimed to assess...
Summary Background In-utero MRI (iuMRI) has shown promise as an adjunct to ultrasound but the comparative diagnostic performance has been poorly defined. We...
Background In-utero MRI (iuMRI) has shown promise as an adjunct to ultrasound but the comparative diagnostic performance has been poorly defined. We aimed to...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
elsevier
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 538
SubjectTerms Abnormalities
Acceptability
Accuracy
Age
Anomalies
Brain
Brain - abnormalities
Brain - diagnostic imaging
Brain research
Clinical trials
Cohort analysis
Confidence
Diagnosis
Diagnostic systems
Ethics
Female
Fetal Diseases - diagnostic imaging
Fetuses
Gestation
Gestational Age
Humans
Internal Medicine
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Management
Medical diagnosis
Neuropathology
NMR
Nuclear magnetic resonance
Predictive Value of Tests
Pregnancy
Prenatal Diagnosis
Prospective Studies
Technology assessment
Ultrasonic imaging
Ultrasound
United Kingdom
Womens health
Title Use of MRI in the diagnosis of fetal brain abnormalities in utero (MERIDIAN): a multicentre, prospective cohort study
URI https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S0140673616317238
https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S0140673616317238
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31723-8
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27988140
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1865237621
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2317857966
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1851296757
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1868338183
Volume 389
WOSCitedRecordID wos000393283400036&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: Biological Science Database
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1474-547X
  dateEnd: 20250907
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0004605
  issn: 0140-6736
  databaseCode: M7P
  dateStart: 19920104
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: http://search.proquest.com/biologicalscijournals
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: Consumer Health Database
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1474-547X
  dateEnd: 20250907
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0004605
  issn: 0140-6736
  databaseCode: M0R
  dateStart: 19920104
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/familyhealth
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: Healthcare Administration Database
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1474-547X
  dateEnd: 20250907
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0004605
  issn: 0140-6736
  databaseCode: M0T
  dateStart: 19920104
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/healthmanagement
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: Nursing & Allied Health Database
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1474-547X
  dateEnd: 20250907
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0004605
  issn: 0140-6736
  databaseCode: 7RV
  dateStart: 19920104
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/nahs
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: ProQuest Central
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1474-547X
  dateEnd: 20250907
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0004605
  issn: 0140-6736
  databaseCode: BENPR
  dateStart: 19920104
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.proquest.com/central
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1474-547X
  dateEnd: 20250907
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0004605
  issn: 0140-6736
  databaseCode: 7X7
  dateStart: 19920104
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/healthcomplete
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: Psychology Database
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1474-547X
  dateEnd: 20250907
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0004605
  issn: 0140-6736
  databaseCode: M2M
  dateStart: 19920104
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.proquest.com/psychology
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: Public Health Database
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1474-547X
  dateEnd: 20250907
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0004605
  issn: 0140-6736
  databaseCode: 8C1
  dateStart: 19920104
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/publichealth
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: Research Library
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1474-547X
  dateEnd: 20250907
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0004605
  issn: 0140-6736
  databaseCode: M2O
  dateStart: 19920104
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/pqrl
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: Science Database
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1474-547X
  dateEnd: 20250907
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0004605
  issn: 0140-6736
  databaseCode: M2P
  dateStart: 19920104
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/sciencejournals
  providerName: ProQuest
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3dT9swELcGTNNe9r1RxipP2gNIy6jj2HF5QYyBxkO7qoOpb5Ht2FIllEDT7u_nzvngpcCkPeSkfFxixc7dz_Hv7gj54j04DpeoSIhUR4lLTKSstpGH-a2VzgrGfSg2kY7HajYbTpofblVDq2xtYjDUeWnxH_kBU1IggyNmR9c3EVaNwtXVpoTGBtnCLAk8UPcm6-IiA8X9LoLn4Hd3cI_JfXCiMY_Ufb7pPuwZfNDZy_9t_SvyokGf9LgeLq_JE1e8Ic9Gzfr6W7K6rBwtPR1Nz-m8oAAOaV5z8eYVHvcOsDo1WFaCalMg3r0KKVnxaiwOUdI9LCP54_x4vH9INQ18xUAAdV8ptLkN7KRYmHexpCG77TtyeXZ6cfIzagozRBbQ1jIyUttUaYwugflgHjuhjddGSmFtzrzjAiyHT3zKhjnXQ-c5ZzaHb1_LIfdC8PdksygLt03oQEsNW-LiHPNWCuOt4UYYkTCTK257JGm7JLNN1nIsnnGVraGnwV7oyUz1yLdO7bpO2_GYgmz7O2tjUsGKZuBYHlNM1ym6qrEFVcayKs4GtTYqAwJGVdBUnWYDd2oY8y8P3W2HWXb3nG6MrT0NQD5VGHkse-RzdxqMCa4Q6cKVK7wF4j-YQ6YPXSMVR5zHe-RD_TV0rzjG7HfQ3p2H2_eRPI8RHSH5Pdklm8vFyn0iT-3f5bxa9MlGOv2DcpYGqUCqE9YnW99Px5Mp7I0GtbxAGY-C_BXkpB8swC1PTlDU
linkProvider ProQuest
linkToHtml http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMw1V1Nb9NAEF1VBQEXvguhBRYJpFbCbez1rjdICFWUqlGbCEEq9bbsrnelSJVd4gTEn-pvZGb90UvacumBQw6xPbGzGc-8id_MI-St95A4XCojzjMdpS41kbTaRh7qWyuc5THzQWwiG4_lycng6wo5b3thkFbZxsQQqPPS4n_kO7EUHBkcSfzp7GeEqlH4dLWV0Kjd4tD9-Q0lW_VxuAe_77sk2f8y-XwQNaoCkQWoMI-M0DaTGlsjoJjJE8e18doIwa3NY-8YB7f3qc_iQc70wHnGYpuD42oxYJ6jSgSE_Fs4Vw8phKP-ZFkfZqDUX3QM7XzvNm7GYguSdsIieVkuvAzrhpy3_-B_W62H5H6DrulufTs8IiuueEzujBr-wBOyOK4cLT0dfRvSaUEB_NK85hpOK9zuHdQi1KBsBtWmQDx_GkbO4tEoflHSTZTJ3Bvujrc-UE0DHzMQXN17CmvUNq5SFB6ezWmY3vuUHN_Il14jq0VZuOeE9rXQ8EpdkuNcTm68Ncxww9PY5JLZHklbF1C2mcqO4iCnagn9Dt4Fz1GyR7Y7s7N6LMl1BqL1L9X23EKWUJA4rzPMlhm6qol1lYpVlah-bY3GgPDRFCxlZ9nAuRqm_ctJN1q3Vhfn6Xx66W4oVDKJndWiR950uyFY4hMwXbhygR-B-BZq5OyqY4RkiGNZjzyr775uiROc7gfX--Lq63tN7h5MRkfqaDg-XCf3EkSCSPRPN8jqfLZwL8lt-2s-rWavQvyg5MdN34J_AbC3pJw
linkToPdf http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMw1V1LbxMxELaqgiouvB-BAkYCqZVYUq_XXgcJoaohIiqNKqBSb67ttaVI1aZkExB_jV_HjPfRS9py6YFDDvuY7MY7j2-yM_MR8joECBw-U4kQuUkyn9lEOeOSAPmtk94JxkMkm8gnE3V8PDhcI3_aXhgsq2x9YnTUxczhf-R9pqTACo6U9UNTFnE4HH08-5EggxS-aW3pNGoV2fe_f0H6Vn0YD-FZv0nT0afve5-ThmEgcQAbFomVxuXKYJsEJDZF6oWxwVgphXMFC54LMIGQhZwNCm4GPnDOXAFKbOSAB4GMEeD-b-QctBi71PfYqp7MWF5_3j3U_9bt3GJyGwJ4yhN1UVy8CPfG-De68z-v3F1yu0HddLc2k3tkzZf3ycZBU1fwgCyPKk9ngR58HdNpSQEU06KuQZxWuD94yFGoRToNamyJOP80jqLFs5EUY0a3kD5zON6dbL-nhsY6zVj46t9SWK-2oZUiIfF8QeNU34fk6Fp-9COyXs5K_4TQHSMNfDKfFjivU9jgLLfCiozZQnHXI1mrDto109qRNORUryjLg62oRVr1yLtO7KweV3KVgGx1Tbe9uBA9NATUqwTzVYK-anxgpZmuUr1TS6MwIH8UBUnVSTYwr4Zv_3LRzVbF9fl1Ov1eeRgSmFxhx7XskVfdYXCi-GbMlH62xK9A3Au5c37ZOVJxxLe8Rx7XltgtcYpT_-B-n15-fy_JBlie_jKe7D8jt1IEiFj_n22S9cV86Z-Tm-7nYlrNX0RXQsnJdVvgX1KErRo
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Use+of+MRI+in+the+diagnosis+of+fetal+brain+abnormalities+in+utero+%28MERIDIAN%29%3A+a+multicentre%2C+prospective+cohort+study&rft.jtitle=The+Lancet+%28British+edition%29&rft.au=Griffiths%2C+Paul+D&rft.au=Bradburn%2C+Michael&rft.au=Campbell%2C+Michael+J&rft.au=Cooper%2C+Cindy+L&rft.date=2017-02-04&rft.issn=0140-6736&rft.volume=389&rft.issue=10068&rft.spage=538&rft.epage=546&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2FS0140-6736%2816%2931723-8&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1016_S0140_6736_16_31723_8
thumbnail_m http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.clinicalkey.com%2Fck-thumbnails%2F01406736%2FS0140673617X00056%2Fcov150h.gif