Optimizing responsiveness to feedback about antibiotic prescribing in primary care: protocol for two interrelated randomized implementation trials with embedded process evaluations

Background Audit and feedback (A&F) that shows how health professionals compare to those of their peers, can be an effective intervention to reduce unnecessary antibiotic prescribing among family physicians. However, the most impactful design approach to A&F to achieve this aim is uncertain....

Celý popis

Uložené v:
Podrobná bibliografia
Vydané v:Implementation science : IS Ročník 17; číslo 1; s. 17
Hlavní autori: Shuldiner, Jennifer, Schwartz, Kevin L., Langford, Bradley J., Ivers, Noah M.
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:English
Vydavateľské údaje: London BioMed Central 14.02.2022
BioMed Central Ltd
Springer Nature B.V
BMC
Predmet:
ISSN:1748-5908, 1748-5908
On-line prístup:Získať plný text
Tagy: Pridať tag
Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!
Abstract Background Audit and feedback (A&F) that shows how health professionals compare to those of their peers, can be an effective intervention to reduce unnecessary antibiotic prescribing among family physicians. However, the most impactful design approach to A&F to achieve this aim is uncertain. We will test three design modifications of antibiotic A&F that could be readily scaled and sustained if shown to be effective: (1) inclusion of case-mix-adjusted peer comparator versus a crude comparator, (2) emphasizing harms, rather than lack of benefits, and (3) providing a viral prescription pad. Methods We will conduct two interrelated pragmatic randomized trials in January 2021. One trial will include family physicians in Ontario who have signed up to receive their MyPractice : Primary Care report from Ontario Health (“OH Trial”). These physicians will be cluster-randomized by practice, 1:1 to intervention or control. The intervention group will also receive a Viral Prescription Pad mailed to their office as well as added emphasis in their report on use of the pad. Ontario family physicians who have not signed up to receive their MyPractice : Primary Care report will be included in the other trial administered by Public Health Ontario (“PHO Trial”). These physicians will be allocated 4:1 to intervention or control. The intervention group will be further randomized by two factors: case-mix adjusted versus unadjusted comparator and emphasis or not on harms of antibiotics. Physicians in the intervention arm of this trial will receive one of four versions of a personalized antibiotic A&F letter from PHO. For both trials, the primary outcome is the antibiotic prescribing rate per 1000 patient visits, measured at 6 months post-randomization, the primary analysis will use Poisson regression and we will follow the intention to treat principle. A mixed-methods process evaluation will use surveys and interviews with family physicians to explore potential mechanisms underlying the observed effects, exploring targeted constructs including intention, self-efficacy, outcome expectancies, descriptive norms, and goal prioritization. Discussion This protocol describes the rationale and methodology of two interrelated pragmatic trials testing variations of theory-informed components of an audit and feedback intervention to determine how to optimize A&F interventions for antibiotic prescribing in primary care. Trial registration NCT04594200, NCT05044052. CIHR Grant ID: 398514
AbstractList Audit and feedback (A&F) that shows how health professionals compare to those of their peers, can be an effective intervention to reduce unnecessary antibiotic prescribing among family physicians. However, the most impactful design approach to A&F to achieve this aim is uncertain. We will test three design modifications of antibiotic A&F that could be readily scaled and sustained if shown to be effective: (1) inclusion of case-mix-adjusted peer comparator versus a crude comparator, (2) emphasizing harms, rather than lack of benefits, and (3) providing a viral prescription pad. We will conduct two interrelated pragmatic randomized trials in January 2021. One trial will include family physicians in Ontario who have signed up to receive their MyPractice: Primary Care report from Ontario Health ("OH Trial"). These physicians will be cluster-randomized by practice, 1:1 to intervention or control. The intervention group will also receive a Viral Prescription Pad mailed to their office as well as added emphasis in their report on use of the pad. Ontario family physicians who have not signed up to receive their MyPractice: Primary Care report will be included in the other trial administered by Public Health Ontario ("PHO Trial"). These physicians will be allocated 4:1 to intervention or control. The intervention group will be further randomized by two factors: case-mix adjusted versus unadjusted comparator and emphasis or not on harms of antibiotics. Physicians in the intervention arm of this trial will receive one of four versions of a personalized antibiotic A&F letter from PHO. For both trials, the primary outcome is the antibiotic prescribing rate per 1000 patient visits, measured at 6 months post-randomization, the primary analysis will use Poisson regression and we will follow the intention to treat principle. A mixed-methods process evaluation will use surveys and interviews with family physicians to explore potential mechanisms underlying the observed effects, exploring targeted constructs including intention, self-efficacy, outcome expectancies, descriptive norms, and goal prioritization. This protocol describes the rationale and methodology of two interrelated pragmatic trials testing variations of theory-informed components of an audit and feedback intervention to determine how to optimize A&F interventions for antibiotic prescribing in primary care.
Audit and feedback (A&F) that shows how health professionals compare to those of their peers, can be an effective intervention to reduce unnecessary antibiotic prescribing among family physicians. However, the most impactful design approach to A&F to achieve this aim is uncertain. We will test three design modifications of antibiotic A&F that could be readily scaled and sustained if shown to be effective: (1) inclusion of case-mix-adjusted peer comparator versus a crude comparator, (2) emphasizing harms, rather than lack of benefits, and (3) providing a viral prescription pad. We will conduct two interrelated pragmatic randomized trials in January 2021. One trial will include family physicians in Ontario who have signed up to receive their MyPractice: Primary Care report from Ontario Health ("OH Trial"). These physicians will be cluster-randomized by practice, 1:1 to intervention or control. The intervention group will also receive a Viral Prescription Pad mailed to their office as well as added emphasis in their report on use of the pad. Ontario family physicians who have not signed up to receive their MyPractice: Primary Care report will be included in the other trial administered by Public Health Ontario ("PHO Trial"). These physicians will be allocated 4:1 to intervention or control. The intervention group will be further randomized by two factors: case-mix adjusted versus unadjusted comparator and emphasis or not on harms of antibiotics. Physicians in the intervention arm of this trial will receive one of four versions of a personalized antibiotic A&F letter from PHO. For both trials, the primary outcome is the antibiotic prescribing rate per 1000 patient visits, measured at 6 months post-randomization, the primary analysis will use Poisson regression and we will follow the intention to treat principle. A mixed-methods process evaluation will use surveys and interviews with family physicians to explore potential mechanisms underlying the observed effects, exploring targeted constructs including intention, self-efficacy, outcome expectancies, descriptive norms, and goal prioritization. This protocol describes the rationale and methodology of two interrelated pragmatic trials testing variations of theory-informed components of an audit and feedback intervention to determine how to optimize A&F interventions for antibiotic prescribing in primary care. NCT04594200, NCT05044052. CIHR Grant ID: 398514.
Background Audit and feedback (A&F) that shows how health professionals compare to those of their peers, can be an effective intervention to reduce unnecessary antibiotic prescribing among family physicians. However, the most impactful design approach to A&F to achieve this aim is uncertain. We will test three design modifications of antibiotic A&F that could be readily scaled and sustained if shown to be effective: (1) inclusion of case-mix-adjusted peer comparator versus a crude comparator, (2) emphasizing harms, rather than lack of benefits, and (3) providing a viral prescription pad. Methods We will conduct two interrelated pragmatic randomized trials in January 2021. One trial will include family physicians in Ontario who have signed up to receive their MyPractice: Primary Care report from Ontario Health (“OH Trial”). These physicians will be cluster-randomized by practice, 1:1 to intervention or control. The intervention group will also receive a Viral Prescription Pad mailed to their office as well as added emphasis in their report on use of the pad. Ontario family physicians who have not signed up to receive their MyPractice: Primary Care report will be included in the other trial administered by Public Health Ontario (“PHO Trial”). These physicians will be allocated 4:1 to intervention or control. The intervention group will be further randomized by two factors: case-mix adjusted versus unadjusted comparator and emphasis or not on harms of antibiotics. Physicians in the intervention arm of this trial will receive one of four versions of a personalized antibiotic A&F letter from PHO. For both trials, the primary outcome is the antibiotic prescribing rate per 1000 patient visits, measured at 6 months post-randomization, the primary analysis will use Poisson regression and we will follow the intention to treat principle. A mixed-methods process evaluation will use surveys and interviews with family physicians to explore potential mechanisms underlying the observed effects, exploring targeted constructs including intention, self-efficacy, outcome expectancies, descriptive norms, and goal prioritization. Discussion This protocol describes the rationale and methodology of two interrelated pragmatic trials testing variations of theory-informed components of an audit and feedback intervention to determine how to optimize A&F interventions for antibiotic prescribing in primary care. Trial registration NCT04594200, NCT05044052. CIHR Grant ID: 398514
Background Audit and feedback (A&F) that shows how health professionals compare to those of their peers, can be an effective intervention to reduce unnecessary antibiotic prescribing among family physicians. However, the most impactful design approach to A&F to achieve this aim is uncertain. We will test three design modifications of antibiotic A&F that could be readily scaled and sustained if shown to be effective: (1) inclusion of case-mix-adjusted peer comparator versus a crude comparator, (2) emphasizing harms, rather than lack of benefits, and (3) providing a viral prescription pad. Methods We will conduct two interrelated pragmatic randomized trials in January 2021. One trial will include family physicians in Ontario who have signed up to receive their MyPractice: Primary Care report from Ontario Health ("OH Trial"). These physicians will be cluster-randomized by practice, 1:1 to intervention or control. The intervention group will also receive a Viral Prescription Pad mailed to their office as well as added emphasis in their report on use of the pad. Ontario family physicians who have not signed up to receive their MyPractice: Primary Care report will be included in the other trial administered by Public Health Ontario ("PHO Trial"). These physicians will be allocated 4:1 to intervention or control. The intervention group will be further randomized by two factors: case-mix adjusted versus unadjusted comparator and emphasis or not on harms of antibiotics. Physicians in the intervention arm of this trial will receive one of four versions of a personalized antibiotic A&F letter from PHO. For both trials, the primary outcome is the antibiotic prescribing rate per 1000 patient visits, measured at 6 months post-randomization, the primary analysis will use Poisson regression and we will follow the intention to treat principle. A mixed-methods process evaluation will use surveys and interviews with family physicians to explore potential mechanisms underlying the observed effects, exploring targeted constructs including intention, self-efficacy, outcome expectancies, descriptive norms, and goal prioritization. Discussion This protocol describes the rationale and methodology of two interrelated pragmatic trials testing variations of theory-informed components of an audit and feedback intervention to determine how to optimize A&F interventions for antibiotic prescribing in primary care. Trial registration NCT04594200, NCT05044052. CIHR Grant ID: 398514 Keywords: Audit and feedback, Antibiotic prescribing, Antimicrobial resistance, Process evaluation, Protocol
Abstract Background Audit and feedback (A&F) that shows how health professionals compare to those of their peers, can be an effective intervention to reduce unnecessary antibiotic prescribing among family physicians. However, the most impactful design approach to A&F to achieve this aim is uncertain. We will test three design modifications of antibiotic A&F that could be readily scaled and sustained if shown to be effective: (1) inclusion of case-mix-adjusted peer comparator versus a crude comparator, (2) emphasizing harms, rather than lack of benefits, and (3) providing a viral prescription pad. Methods We will conduct two interrelated pragmatic randomized trials in January 2021. One trial will include family physicians in Ontario who have signed up to receive their MyPractice: Primary Care report from Ontario Health (“OH Trial”). These physicians will be cluster-randomized by practice, 1:1 to intervention or control. The intervention group will also receive a Viral Prescription Pad mailed to their office as well as added emphasis in their report on use of the pad. Ontario family physicians who have not signed up to receive their MyPractice: Primary Care report will be included in the other trial administered by Public Health Ontario (“PHO Trial”). These physicians will be allocated 4:1 to intervention or control. The intervention group will be further randomized by two factors: case-mix adjusted versus unadjusted comparator and emphasis or not on harms of antibiotics. Physicians in the intervention arm of this trial will receive one of four versions of a personalized antibiotic A&F letter from PHO. For both trials, the primary outcome is the antibiotic prescribing rate per 1000 patient visits, measured at 6 months post-randomization, the primary analysis will use Poisson regression and we will follow the intention to treat principle. A mixed-methods process evaluation will use surveys and interviews with family physicians to explore potential mechanisms underlying the observed effects, exploring targeted constructs including intention, self-efficacy, outcome expectancies, descriptive norms, and goal prioritization. Discussion This protocol describes the rationale and methodology of two interrelated pragmatic trials testing variations of theory-informed components of an audit and feedback intervention to determine how to optimize A&F interventions for antibiotic prescribing in primary care. Trial registration NCT04594200, NCT05044052. CIHR Grant ID: 398514
Audit and feedback (A&F) that shows how health professionals compare to those of their peers, can be an effective intervention to reduce unnecessary antibiotic prescribing among family physicians. However, the most impactful design approach to A&F to achieve this aim is uncertain. We will test three design modifications of antibiotic A&F that could be readily scaled and sustained if shown to be effective: (1) inclusion of case-mix-adjusted peer comparator versus a crude comparator, (2) emphasizing harms, rather than lack of benefits, and (3) providing a viral prescription pad.BACKGROUNDAudit and feedback (A&F) that shows how health professionals compare to those of their peers, can be an effective intervention to reduce unnecessary antibiotic prescribing among family physicians. However, the most impactful design approach to A&F to achieve this aim is uncertain. We will test three design modifications of antibiotic A&F that could be readily scaled and sustained if shown to be effective: (1) inclusion of case-mix-adjusted peer comparator versus a crude comparator, (2) emphasizing harms, rather than lack of benefits, and (3) providing a viral prescription pad.We will conduct two interrelated pragmatic randomized trials in January 2021. One trial will include family physicians in Ontario who have signed up to receive their MyPractice: Primary Care report from Ontario Health ("OH Trial"). These physicians will be cluster-randomized by practice, 1:1 to intervention or control. The intervention group will also receive a Viral Prescription Pad mailed to their office as well as added emphasis in their report on use of the pad. Ontario family physicians who have not signed up to receive their MyPractice: Primary Care report will be included in the other trial administered by Public Health Ontario ("PHO Trial"). These physicians will be allocated 4:1 to intervention or control. The intervention group will be further randomized by two factors: case-mix adjusted versus unadjusted comparator and emphasis or not on harms of antibiotics. Physicians in the intervention arm of this trial will receive one of four versions of a personalized antibiotic A&F letter from PHO. For both trials, the primary outcome is the antibiotic prescribing rate per 1000 patient visits, measured at 6 months post-randomization, the primary analysis will use Poisson regression and we will follow the intention to treat principle. A mixed-methods process evaluation will use surveys and interviews with family physicians to explore potential mechanisms underlying the observed effects, exploring targeted constructs including intention, self-efficacy, outcome expectancies, descriptive norms, and goal prioritization.METHODSWe will conduct two interrelated pragmatic randomized trials in January 2021. One trial will include family physicians in Ontario who have signed up to receive their MyPractice: Primary Care report from Ontario Health ("OH Trial"). These physicians will be cluster-randomized by practice, 1:1 to intervention or control. The intervention group will also receive a Viral Prescription Pad mailed to their office as well as added emphasis in their report on use of the pad. Ontario family physicians who have not signed up to receive their MyPractice: Primary Care report will be included in the other trial administered by Public Health Ontario ("PHO Trial"). These physicians will be allocated 4:1 to intervention or control. The intervention group will be further randomized by two factors: case-mix adjusted versus unadjusted comparator and emphasis or not on harms of antibiotics. Physicians in the intervention arm of this trial will receive one of four versions of a personalized antibiotic A&F letter from PHO. For both trials, the primary outcome is the antibiotic prescribing rate per 1000 patient visits, measured at 6 months post-randomization, the primary analysis will use Poisson regression and we will follow the intention to treat principle. A mixed-methods process evaluation will use surveys and interviews with family physicians to explore potential mechanisms underlying the observed effects, exploring targeted constructs including intention, self-efficacy, outcome expectancies, descriptive norms, and goal prioritization.This protocol describes the rationale and methodology of two interrelated pragmatic trials testing variations of theory-informed components of an audit and feedback intervention to determine how to optimize A&F interventions for antibiotic prescribing in primary care.DISCUSSIONThis protocol describes the rationale and methodology of two interrelated pragmatic trials testing variations of theory-informed components of an audit and feedback intervention to determine how to optimize A&F interventions for antibiotic prescribing in primary care.NCT04594200, NCT05044052. CIHR Grant ID: 398514.TRIAL REGISTRATIONNCT04594200, NCT05044052. CIHR Grant ID: 398514.
Background Audit and feedback (A&F) that shows how health professionals compare to those of their peers, can be an effective intervention to reduce unnecessary antibiotic prescribing among family physicians. However, the most impactful design approach to A&F to achieve this aim is uncertain. We will test three design modifications of antibiotic A&F that could be readily scaled and sustained if shown to be effective: (1) inclusion of case-mix-adjusted peer comparator versus a crude comparator, (2) emphasizing harms, rather than lack of benefits, and (3) providing a viral prescription pad. Methods We will conduct two interrelated pragmatic randomized trials in January 2021. One trial will include family physicians in Ontario who have signed up to receive their MyPractice : Primary Care report from Ontario Health (“OH Trial”). These physicians will be cluster-randomized by practice, 1:1 to intervention or control. The intervention group will also receive a Viral Prescription Pad mailed to their office as well as added emphasis in their report on use of the pad. Ontario family physicians who have not signed up to receive their MyPractice : Primary Care report will be included in the other trial administered by Public Health Ontario (“PHO Trial”). These physicians will be allocated 4:1 to intervention or control. The intervention group will be further randomized by two factors: case-mix adjusted versus unadjusted comparator and emphasis or not on harms of antibiotics. Physicians in the intervention arm of this trial will receive one of four versions of a personalized antibiotic A&F letter from PHO. For both trials, the primary outcome is the antibiotic prescribing rate per 1000 patient visits, measured at 6 months post-randomization, the primary analysis will use Poisson regression and we will follow the intention to treat principle. A mixed-methods process evaluation will use surveys and interviews with family physicians to explore potential mechanisms underlying the observed effects, exploring targeted constructs including intention, self-efficacy, outcome expectancies, descriptive norms, and goal prioritization. Discussion This protocol describes the rationale and methodology of two interrelated pragmatic trials testing variations of theory-informed components of an audit and feedback intervention to determine how to optimize A&F interventions for antibiotic prescribing in primary care. Trial registration NCT04594200, NCT05044052. CIHR Grant ID: 398514
ArticleNumber 17
Audience Academic
Author Shuldiner, Jennifer
Ivers, Noah M.
Langford, Bradley J.
Schwartz, Kevin L.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Jennifer
  surname: Shuldiner
  fullname: Shuldiner, Jennifer
  email: Jennifer.shuldiner@wchospital.ca
  organization: Women’s College Hospital
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Kevin L.
  surname: Schwartz
  fullname: Schwartz, Kevin L.
  organization: Dalla Lana School of Public Health – University of Toronto, ICES, Unity Health Toronto, Public Health Ontario
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Bradley J.
  surname: Langford
  fullname: Langford, Bradley J.
  organization: Public Health Ontario
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Noah M.
  surname: Ivers
  fullname: Ivers, Noah M.
  organization: University of Toronto, Women’s College Hospital
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35164805$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9kstu1DAUhiNURC_wAiyQJTZsptiOnTgskKqKS6VK3cDacuyTqUtiD7ZnKnguHpAzF9pOhaooiu18_398jv7j6iDEAFX1mtFTxlTzPrOaMj6jHF_GOjFTz6oj1go1kx1VBw_Wh9VxzjeUCima-kV1WEvWCEXlUfXnalH85H_7MCcJ8iKG7FcQIGdSIhkAXG_sD2L6uCzEhOJ7H4u3ZIGwTbhDnQ-49ZNJv4g1CT7gLpZo40iGmEi5jUgUSAlGU8CRZIKLWBKXflqMMEEopvgYSEnejJnc-nJNYOrBOWTQzK6vAyszLjdcflk9HxCEV7vvSfX986dv519nl1dfLs7PLme2oW2Zcdnxru3rzlCuQHFa98oNrTJU8aHpFW0664Qw3FpqwQxGgmy45MCcFIK7-qS62Pq6aG70rkcdjdebg5jm2iScxgjatbauW-aoU73ogHWUKsdBWsUa1zcKvT5uvRbLfgJnselkxj3T_T_BX-t5XGmlBMc-0ODdziDFn0vIRU8-WxhHEyAus-YN76iUoqaIvn2E3sRlCjgqpGoqatay5p6aG2zAhyFiXbs21WdN1wmpuGRInf6HwsfB5C0GcvB4vid487DRuw7_ZQ4BvgVsijknGO4QRvU62HobbI3B1ptg6_X41COR9dvU4HX8-LS03koz1glzSPfTeEL1FwXLEN0
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1001_jamanetworkopen_2025_18261
crossref_primary_10_1136_bmj_2024_079329
crossref_primary_10_1093_jacamr_dlad048
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13012_024_01393_5
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.brat.2016.11.001
10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
10.7326/M14-1933
10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00215-4
10.1136/bmj.h2147
10.1037/0022-006X.73.5.852
10.1016/B978-012373960-5.00302-6
10.1111/bmsp.12028
10.1093/med/9780199685028.001.0001
10.1186/s13012-019-0951-x
10.1016/j.amepre.2014.06.021
10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.2790
10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008355
10.1016/j.jval.2013.08.2291
10.1037/hea0000958
10.1186/s13012-021-01088-1
10.1207/s15324796abm3001_8
10.1001/jama.289.6.719
10.1037/0278-6133.23.5.443
10.1371/journal.pmed.1002115
10.3747/co.26.4555
10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1133
10.1037/1082-989X.8.4.434
10.9778/cmajo.20190175
10.1186/s12913-017-2031-8
10.1186/s13012-019-0883-5
10.15517/ap.v30i121.23458
10.1001/jama.2016.0275
10.1177/109821400202300202
10.1016/j.ijsu.2011.10.001
10.7326/M15-2248
10.4161/viru.21626
10.1016/j.cmi.2021.10.013
10.1037/a0024509
10.7326/M16-1131
10.1186/s13012-019-0887-1
10.1002/14651858.CD000259.pub3
10.1093/ofid/ofaa575
10.1093/cid/ciab256
10.1186/1748-5908-9-14
10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011879
10.3102/01623737015002195
10.1093/jac/dkz112
10.1093/jacamr/dlaa105
ContentType Journal Article
Contributor Morris, Andrew M
Kidd, Michael R
Taljaard, Monica
Daneman, Nick
Presseau, Justin
Lam, Jonathan
Mulhall, Cara
Greiver, Michelle
Leis, Jerome A
Brown, Kevin
Gushue, Sharon
Thavorn, Kednapa
Francis, Jillian J
Uppal, Sukhleen
Tadrous, Mina
Garber, Gary
Brehaut, Jamie
Grimshaw, Jeremy M
Gomes, Tara
Wong, Andrew
Leung, Valerie
Lacroix, Meagan
Silverman, Michael
Zwarenstein, Merrick
Witteman, Holly O
Contributor_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Monica
  surname: Taljaard
  fullname: Taljaard, Monica
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Jeremy M
  surname: Grimshaw
  fullname: Grimshaw, Jeremy M
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Meagan
  surname: Lacroix
  fullname: Lacroix, Meagan
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Mina
  surname: Tadrous
  fullname: Tadrous, Mina
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Valerie
  surname: Leung
  fullname: Leung, Valerie
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Kevin
  surname: Brown
  fullname: Brown, Kevin
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Andrew M
  surname: Morris
  fullname: Morris, Andrew M
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Gary
  surname: Garber
  fullname: Garber, Gary
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Justin
  surname: Presseau
  fullname: Presseau, Justin
– sequence: 10
  givenname: Kednapa
  surname: Thavorn
  fullname: Thavorn, Kednapa
– sequence: 11
  givenname: Jerome A
  surname: Leis
  fullname: Leis, Jerome A
– sequence: 12
  givenname: Holly O
  surname: Witteman
  fullname: Witteman, Holly O
– sequence: 13
  givenname: Jamie
  surname: Brehaut
  fullname: Brehaut, Jamie
– sequence: 14
  givenname: Nick
  surname: Daneman
  fullname: Daneman, Nick
– sequence: 15
  givenname: Michael
  surname: Silverman
  fullname: Silverman, Michael
– sequence: 16
  givenname: Michelle
  surname: Greiver
  fullname: Greiver, Michelle
– sequence: 17
  givenname: Tara
  surname: Gomes
  fullname: Gomes, Tara
– sequence: 18
  givenname: Michael R
  surname: Kidd
  fullname: Kidd, Michael R
– sequence: 19
  givenname: Jillian J
  surname: Francis
  fullname: Francis, Jillian J
– sequence: 20
  givenname: Merrick
  surname: Zwarenstein
  fullname: Zwarenstein, Merrick
– sequence: 21
  givenname: Jonathan
  surname: Lam
  fullname: Lam, Jonathan
– sequence: 22
  givenname: Cara
  surname: Mulhall
  fullname: Mulhall, Cara
– sequence: 23
  givenname: Sharon
  surname: Gushue
  fullname: Gushue, Sharon
– sequence: 24
  givenname: Sukhleen
  surname: Uppal
  fullname: Uppal, Sukhleen
– sequence: 25
  givenname: Andrew
  surname: Wong
  fullname: Wong, Andrew
Copyright The Author(s) 2022
2022. The Author(s).
COPYRIGHT 2022 BioMed Central Ltd.
2022. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Copyright_xml – notice: The Author(s) 2022
– notice: 2022. The Author(s).
– notice: COPYRIGHT 2022 BioMed Central Ltd.
– notice: 2022. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
CorporateAuthor On behalf of the Ontario Healthcare Implementation Laboratory study team
Ontario Healthcare Implementation Laboratory study team
CorporateAuthor_xml – name: On behalf of the Ontario Healthcare Implementation Laboratory study team
– name: Ontario Healthcare Implementation Laboratory study team
DBID C6C
AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
3V.
7X7
7XB
88E
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AFKRA
AZQEC
BENPR
CCPQU
COVID
DWQXO
FYUFA
GHDGH
K9.
M0S
M1P
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.1186/s13012-022-01194-8
DatabaseName Springer Nature OA Free Journals
CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Health & Medical Collection (Proquest)
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
Hospital Premium Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One
Coronavirus Research Database
ProQuest Central Korea
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
Medical Database ProQuest
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic (New)
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic (retired)
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Central
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
Health Research Premium Collection
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central Korea
Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
Coronavirus Research Database
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest Medical Library
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
MEDLINE
Publicly Available Content Database


MEDLINE - Academic

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: PIMPY
  name: Publicly Available Content Database
  url: http://search.proquest.com/publiccontent
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
Public Health
EISSN 1748-5908
EndPage 17
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_d7c3371d0d8b49e19008d2e5c816db68
PMC8842929
A699458251
35164805
10_1186_s13012_022_01194_8
Genre Clinical Trial Protocol
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
GeographicLocations Canada
Ontario Canada
GeographicLocations_xml – name: Canada
– name: Ontario Canada
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  grantid: 398514
  funderid: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000024
– fundername: CIHR
  grantid: 398514
– fundername: ;
  grantid: 398514
GroupedDBID ---
0R~
29I
2WC
44B
53G
5GY
5VS
7X7
88E
8FI
8FJ
AAFWJ
AAJSJ
AASML
AAWTL
ABDBF
ABUWG
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACHQT
ACIHN
ACUHS
ADBBV
ADUKV
AEAQA
AENEX
AFKRA
AFPKN
AHBYD
AHMBA
AHYZX
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMKLP
AMTXH
AOIJS
BAPOH
BAWUL
BCNDV
BENPR
BFQNJ
BMC
BPHCQ
BVXVI
C6C
CCPQU
CS3
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EBD
EBLON
EBS
ESX
F5P
FYUFA
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
HMCUK
HYE
IAO
IHR
INH
INR
ITC
KQ8
M1P
M48
MK0
M~E
O5R
O5S
OK1
OVT
P2P
PGMZT
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PJZUB
PPXIY
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
PUEGO
RBZ
RNS
ROL
RPM
RSV
SMD
SOJ
TR2
TUS
UKHRP
WOQ
WOW
~8M
AAYXX
AFFHD
CITATION
ALIPV
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
3V.
7XB
8FK
AZQEC
COVID
DWQXO
K9.
PKEHL
PQEST
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c607t-259297b39a028e8203b8df78a082f6b8069cd44a2cc0ceafa5e56252e1d5442d3
IEDL.DBID RSV
ISICitedReferencesCount 4
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000755119300001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 1748-5908
IngestDate Fri Oct 03 12:53:03 EDT 2025
Tue Nov 04 02:01:04 EST 2025
Fri Sep 05 07:29:16 EDT 2025
Wed Oct 15 14:21:08 EDT 2025
Tue Nov 11 09:07:49 EST 2025
Tue Nov 04 17:03:29 EST 2025
Thu Apr 03 07:08:19 EDT 2025
Sat Nov 29 06:04:46 EST 2025
Tue Nov 18 21:44:55 EST 2025
Sat Sep 06 07:24:47 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords Antimicrobial resistance
Protocol
Audit and feedback
Process evaluation
Antibiotic prescribing
Language English
License 2022. The Author(s).
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c607t-259297b39a028e8203b8df78a082f6b8069cd44a2cc0ceafa5e56252e1d5442d3
Notes ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Feature-3
ObjectType-Evidence Based Healthcare-1
ObjectType-Undefined-1
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://link.springer.com/10.1186/s13012-022-01194-8
PMID 35164805
PQID 2630431716
PQPubID 54980
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_d7c3371d0d8b49e19008d2e5c816db68
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8842929
proquest_miscellaneous_2629055430
proquest_journals_2630431716
gale_infotracmisc_A699458251
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A699458251
pubmed_primary_35164805
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13012_022_01194_8
crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_s13012_022_01194_8
springer_journals_10_1186_s13012_022_01194_8
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2022-02-14
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2022-02-14
PublicationDate_xml – month: 02
  year: 2022
  text: 2022-02-14
  day: 14
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace London
PublicationPlace_xml – name: London
– name: England
PublicationTitle Implementation science : IS
PublicationTitleAbbrev Implementation Sci
PublicationTitleAlternate Implement Sci
PublicationYear 2022
Publisher BioMed Central
BioMed Central Ltd
Springer Nature B.V
BMC
Publisher_xml – name: BioMed Central
– name: BioMed Central Ltd
– name: Springer Nature B.V
– name: BMC
References JM Grimshaw (1194_CR14) 2019; 28
R Schwarzer (1194_CR34) 2016; 30
T Kitano (1194_CR12) 2021
Nudge vs Superbugs (1194_CR5) 2018
LM Collins (1194_CR18) 2005; 30
S Olejnik (1194_CR39) 2003; 8
AJ Bellg (1194_CR30) 2004; 23
B Brown (1194_CR43) 2019; 14
JC Brehaut (1194_CR44) 2016; 164
SJ Seung (1194_CR50) 2019; 26
AR Levy (1194_CR26) 2003; 10
AF Hayes (1194_CR40) 2014; 67
PI Fusch (1194_CR46) 2015; 20
R Schwarzer (1194_CR35) 2011; 56
NM Ivers (1194_CR9) 2014; 9
KL Schwartz (1194_CR1) 2019; 74
P Elouafkaoui (1194_CR20) 2016; 13
1194_CR42
KL Schwartz (1194_CR19) 2020; 8
V Braun (1194_CR45) 2006; 3
I Grava-Gubins (1194_CR32) 2008; 54
1194_CR51
M Hallsworth (1194_CR4) 2016; 387
BE Jones (1194_CR2) 2015; 163
W Malcolm (1194_CR10) 2020; 2
1194_CR16
WT Gude (1194_CR36) 2019; 14
1194_CR17
J Presseau (1194_CR33) 2019; 14
1194_CR13
N McCleary (1194_CR38) 2020; 39
1194_CR15
Public Health Agency of Canada (1194_CR3) 2020
M Silverman (1194_CR23) 2017; 166
1194_CR52
1194_CR8
LM Collins (1194_CR28) 2014; 47
1194_CR11
SD Sullivan (1194_CR53) 2014; 17
D Moher (1194_CR27) 2012; 10
D Meeker (1194_CR6) 2016; 315
B Borrelli (1194_CR31) 2005; 73
GW Chung (1194_CR7) 2013; 4
L Desveaux (1194_CR21) 2021; 16
AF Hayes (1194_CR41) 2017; 98
KL Carman (1194_CR29) 2013; 32
Y Hopf (1194_CR47) 2016; 6
1194_CR24
1194_CR25
A McConney (1194_CR49) 2002; 23
MA Steinman (1194_CR22) 2003; 289
M Sekhon (1194_CR37) 2017; 17
VJ Caracelli (1194_CR48) 1993; 15
References_xml – volume: 98
  start-page: 39
  year: 2017
  ident: 1194_CR41
  publication-title: Behav Res Ther
  doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2016.11.001
– ident: 1194_CR51
– volume: 3
  start-page: 77
  issue: 2
  year: 2006
  ident: 1194_CR45
  publication-title: Qual Res Psychol
  doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
– volume: 163
  start-page: 73
  issue: 2
  year: 2015
  ident: 1194_CR2
  publication-title: Ann Intern Med
  doi: 10.7326/M14-1933
– volume: 387
  start-page: 1743
  issue: 10029
  year: 2016
  ident: 1194_CR4
  publication-title: Lancet
  doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00215-4
– ident: 1194_CR17
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.h2147
– volume: 73
  start-page: 852
  issue: 5
  year: 2005
  ident: 1194_CR31
  publication-title: J Consult Clin Psychol
  doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.73.5.852
– ident: 1194_CR16
  doi: 10.1016/B978-012373960-5.00302-6
– ident: 1194_CR25
– volume-title: Canadian Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System report
  year: 2020
  ident: 1194_CR3
– volume: 67
  start-page: 451
  issue: 3
  year: 2014
  ident: 1194_CR40
  publication-title: Br J Math Stat Psychol
  doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12028
– ident: 1194_CR52
  doi: 10.1093/med/9780199685028.001.0001
– volume: 14
  start-page: 102
  issue: 1
  year: 2019
  ident: 1194_CR33
  publication-title: Implementation Sci
  doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0951-x
– volume: 47
  start-page: 498
  issue: 4
  year: 2014
  ident: 1194_CR28
  publication-title: Am J Prev Med
  doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.06.021
– ident: 1194_CR15
  doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.2790
– volume: 28
  start-page: 416
  issue: 5
  year: 2019
  ident: 1194_CR14
  publication-title: BMJ Quality Safety
  doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008355
– volume: 17
  start-page: 5
  issue: 1
  year: 2014
  ident: 1194_CR53
  publication-title: Value in health
  doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.08.2291
– volume: 39
  start-page: 1048
  issue: 12
  year: 2020
  ident: 1194_CR38
  publication-title: Health Psychol
  doi: 10.1037/hea0000958
– volume: 16
  start-page: 19
  issue: 1
  year: 2021
  ident: 1194_CR21
  publication-title: Implementation Science
  doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01088-1
– volume: 20
  start-page: 1408
  issue: 9
  year: 2015
  ident: 1194_CR46
  publication-title: Qual Rep
– volume: 30
  start-page: 65
  issue: 1
  year: 2005
  ident: 1194_CR18
  publication-title: Ann Behav Med
  doi: 10.1207/s15324796abm3001_8
– volume: 289
  start-page: 719
  issue: 6
  year: 2003
  ident: 1194_CR22
  publication-title: Jama
  doi: 10.1001/jama.289.6.719
– volume: 23
  start-page: 443
  issue: 5
  year: 2004
  ident: 1194_CR30
  publication-title: Health Psychol
  doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.23.5.443
– volume: 13
  start-page: e1002115
  issue: 8
  year: 2016
  ident: 1194_CR20
  publication-title: PLoS Med
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002115
– volume: 26
  start-page: 102
  issue: 2
  year: 2019
  ident: 1194_CR50
  publication-title: Curr Oncol
  doi: 10.3747/co.26.4555
– ident: 1194_CR24
– volume-title: a behavioural economics trial to reduce the overprescribing of antibiotics
  year: 2018
  ident: 1194_CR5
– volume: 32
  start-page: 223
  issue: 2
  year: 2013
  ident: 1194_CR29
  publication-title: Health Aff (Millwood)
  doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1133
– volume: 8
  start-page: 434
  issue: 4
  year: 2003
  ident: 1194_CR39
  publication-title: Psychological Methods
  doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.8.4.434
– volume: 8
  start-page: E360
  issue: 2
  year: 2020
  ident: 1194_CR19
  publication-title: CMAJ open
  doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20190175
– volume: 17
  start-page: 88
  issue: 1
  year: 2017
  ident: 1194_CR37
  publication-title: BMC Health Services Res
  doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2031-8
– volume: 14
  start-page: 40
  issue: 1
  year: 2019
  ident: 1194_CR43
  publication-title: Implementation Sci
  doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0883-5
– volume: 30
  start-page: 119
  issue: 121
  year: 2016
  ident: 1194_CR34
  publication-title: Actualidades en Psicología
  doi: 10.15517/ap.v30i121.23458
– volume: 315
  start-page: 562
  issue: 6
  year: 2016
  ident: 1194_CR6
  publication-title: JAMA
  doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0275
– volume: 23
  start-page: 121
  issue: 2
  year: 2002
  ident: 1194_CR49
  publication-title: Am J Evaluation
  doi: 10.1177/109821400202300202
– volume: 10
  start-page: 28
  issue: 1
  year: 2012
  ident: 1194_CR27
  publication-title: Int J Surgery
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2011.10.001
– volume: 164
  start-page: 435
  issue: 6
  year: 2016
  ident: 1194_CR44
  publication-title: Ann Intern Med
  doi: 10.7326/M15-2248
– volume: 10
  start-page: 67
  issue: 2
  year: 2003
  ident: 1194_CR26
  publication-title: Can J Clin Pharmacol
– volume: 4
  start-page: 151
  issue: 2
  year: 2013
  ident: 1194_CR7
  publication-title: Virulence
  doi: 10.4161/viru.21626
– ident: 1194_CR13
  doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.10.013
– volume: 56
  start-page: 161
  issue: 3
  year: 2011
  ident: 1194_CR35
  publication-title: Rehabil Psychol
  doi: 10.1037/a0024509
– volume: 166
  start-page: 765
  issue: 11
  year: 2017
  ident: 1194_CR23
  publication-title: Ann Intern Med
  doi: 10.7326/M16-1131
– volume: 14
  start-page: 39
  issue: 1
  year: 2019
  ident: 1194_CR36
  publication-title: Implementation Sci
  doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0887-1
– ident: 1194_CR42
  doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000259.pub3
– volume-title: Open Forum Infectious Diseases
  year: 2021
  ident: 1194_CR12
– volume: 54
  start-page: 1424
  issue: 10
  year: 2008
  ident: 1194_CR32
  publication-title: Can Fam Physician
– ident: 1194_CR11
  doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaa575
– ident: 1194_CR8
  doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab256
– volume: 9
  start-page: 14
  issue: 1
  year: 2014
  ident: 1194_CR9
  publication-title: Implementation Sci
  doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-14
– volume: 6
  start-page: e011879
  issue: 10
  year: 2016
  ident: 1194_CR47
  publication-title: BMJ Open
  doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011879
– volume: 15
  start-page: 195
  issue: 2
  year: 1993
  ident: 1194_CR48
  publication-title: Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis
  doi: 10.3102/01623737015002195
– volume: 74
  start-page: 2098
  issue: 7
  year: 2019
  ident: 1194_CR1
  publication-title: J Antimicrob Chemother
  doi: 10.1093/jac/dkz112
– volume: 2
  start-page: dlaa105
  issue: 4
  year: 2020
  ident: 1194_CR10
  publication-title: JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance
  doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlaa105
SSID ssj0045463
Score 2.328922
Snippet Background Audit and feedback (A&F) that shows how health professionals compare to those of their peers, can be an effective intervention to reduce unnecessary...
Audit and feedback (A&F) that shows how health professionals compare to those of their peers, can be an effective intervention to reduce unnecessary antibiotic...
Background Audit and feedback (A&F) that shows how health professionals compare to those of their peers, can be an effective intervention to reduce unnecessary...
Abstract Background Audit and feedback (A&F) that shows how health professionals compare to those of their peers, can be an effective intervention to reduce...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
gale
pubmed
crossref
springer
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 17
SubjectTerms Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use
Antibiotic prescribing
Antibiotics
Antimicrobial agents
Antimicrobial resistance
Audit and feedback
Auditing
Audits
Canada Health Act
Clinical competence
Complications and side effects
Coronaviruses
COVID-19
Design
Dosage and administration
Drug resistance
Evaluation
Factorial experiments
Family medicine
Feedback
Health Administration
Health aspects
Health Informatics
Health Policy
Health Promotion and Disease Prevention
Health services
Health Services Research
Humans
Intervention
Management
Medical screening
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Methods
Pandemics
Patients
Physicians
Physicians, Family
Population
Practice Patterns, Physicians
Prescriptions
Prevention
Primary care
Primary Health Care
Process Assessment, Health Care
Process evaluation
Protocol
Public Health
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Study Protocol
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELZQxQEJId4ECjISEgeI6kcSO9wKouJUOIDUm-VXRASbVJsUJH4XP5AZJ9k2RcCF22ZtJ_Z4PI9k5htCnsUoGqc0y63lMi8UK3NXwGWUNkbQ59w6nYpNqONjfXJSf7hQ6gtjwiZ44IlwB0F5KRUPLGhX1BH0F9NBxNJrXgVXpTRfpurFmZpkcIEg70uKjK4OBpDUGIIgMAwB3PZcr9RQQuv_XSZfUEqXAyYvfTVNyujoJrkxW5H0cJr9LXIldrfJ9ekVHJ0yi-6Qn-9BHGzaH3AHup1DYSfRRseeNqC2nPVfaApNpkDg1rU93I9iaCzIEofj2g4uEx4FxRixVxRxHXpgHgrGLh2_9xTxJrYpIyYGCoov9PBI-Nlulsh03HqaqoMMFF_70rhxEeRdoKdTlgI9hxwf7pJPR28_vnmXz0Uacl8xNebgPolaOVlbsFQi2BPS6dAobcG2aCqnWVX7UBRWeM98tI0tI_pcIvJQFoUI8h7Z6_ouPiDUNaUCXx2MsNIWUjeO60Z7FixYQZzbkBG-7JnxM4I5FtL4apInoysz7bOBfTZpn43OyIvdmJlef-39Gllh1xOxt9MfwJFm5kjzL47MyHNkJIMSAqbn7ZzoAItErC1zWNU1fq0seUb2Vz3hZPt188KKZpYsgxGVRDwkcHMz8nTXjCMxWq6L_Rn2ETUDO1GyjNyfOHe3JFmCg6xZmRG14unVmtctXfs54Y5rjbXN6oy8XLj_fFp_punD_0HTR-SaSKdX5LzYJ3vj9iw-Jlf9t7Edtk_S2f8F9K9ftg
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
– databaseName: Publicly Available Content Database
  dbid: PIMPY
  link: http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lj9MwELagywEJ8WYJLMhISBwgqvO0wwUtiBUcWHoAaTlZfgUitsnSdEHid_EDmXGclixiT9ya2knt9PPnsT3zDSGPnUtrzQWLlUqyOOesiHUOly5TzsF8nigtfLIJfngojo6qRQiP7oNb5ciJnqgHtWf02wYSntvO4I75PC0zVIUBY__FybcYc0jhWWtIqHGR7KDwFpuRncXbd4tPIzPnKP0-Bs6Ict4Df6NjQorOCbCYj8VkcvIa_n8z9R9T1Vk3yjNnqX6KOrj2fzt3nVwNpirdH7B1g1xw7U1yZdjno0P40i3y6z1wzrL5CQ2iq-BvO_AnXXe0hrlRK_OVev9nCv9io5sOnkfR_xYIS-N9TQuXXvSCoiPac4riER0glIJFTdc_OoqiFisfduMshdnVdvCT8LFZju7viC_qU5D0FPeWqVtqB6Rq6ckQCkG3uub9bfLx4PWHV2_ikAkiNiXj6xjWaGnFdVYpMIccGC2ZFrbmQoEBU5dasLIyNs9VagwzTtWqcLiwS11iAQipze6QWdu17i6hui54xThYeoXKM1HrRNTCMKvA1EoSZSOSjBCQJsikY7aOY-mXS6KUA2wkwEZ62EgRkaebe8L7Orf2S0TWpiYKfPsvutVnGfhCWm6yjCeWWaHzyoHZxoRNXWFEUlpdwkOeIC4l0hA0z6gQTQGdREEvuV9WFR6JFklE9iY1gT7MtHiEpAz01cstAiPyaFOMd6JLXuu6U6yTVgyM0YxFZHcYCJsuZQWswgUrIsInQ2TS52lJ23zx4uZCYAK1KiLPxsG0bda_3-m983txn1xO_TBP4yTfI7P16tQ9IJfM93XTrx4GmvgNGEp60w
  priority: 102
  providerName: ProQuest
Title Optimizing responsiveness to feedback about antibiotic prescribing in primary care: protocol for two interrelated randomized implementation trials with embedded process evaluations
URI https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13012-022-01194-8
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35164805
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2630431716
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2629055430
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC8842929
https://doaj.org/article/d7c3371d0d8b49e19008d2e5c816db68
Volume 17
WOSCitedRecordID wos000755119300001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVADU
  databaseName: BioMedCentral
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1748-5908
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0045463
  issn: 1748-5908
  databaseCode: RBZ
  dateStart: 20060101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.biomedcentral.com/search/
  providerName: BioMedCentral
– providerCode: PRVAON
  databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1748-5908
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0045463
  issn: 1748-5908
  databaseCode: DOA
  dateStart: 20060101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.doaj.org/
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
– providerCode: PRVHPJ
  databaseName: ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1748-5908
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0045463
  issn: 1748-5908
  databaseCode: M~E
  dateStart: 20060101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://road.issn.org
  providerName: ISSN International Centre
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: Health & Medical Collection
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1748-5908
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0045463
  issn: 1748-5908
  databaseCode: 7X7
  dateStart: 20090101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/healthcomplete
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: ProQuest Central
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1748-5908
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0045463
  issn: 1748-5908
  databaseCode: BENPR
  dateStart: 20090101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.proquest.com/central
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: Publicly Available Content Database
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1748-5908
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0045463
  issn: 1748-5908
  databaseCode: PIMPY
  dateStart: 20090101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: http://search.proquest.com/publiccontent
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVAVX
  databaseName: SpringerLINK Contemporary 1997-Present
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1748-5908
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0045463
  issn: 1748-5908
  databaseCode: RSV
  dateStart: 20061201
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://link.springer.com/search?facet-content-type=%22Journal%22
  providerName: Springer Nature
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Zb9QwEB7RFiEkxFGuQFkZCYkHiJrbDm8tagUPXVZcKk-Wr0AEm6DdLUj8Ln4gM06yJeWQ4GW1Xh8bx-NvZuzxZ4AHziWV5iIKlYrTMONRHuoMky5VzqE-j5UW_rIJPp2K4-Ny1h8KWw7R7sOWpEdqP61FsbtEtKUwgoRCCdD1DsUGbOXENkM--qu3A_5mRPA-HI_5bb2RCvJM_b_i8U8K6Wyw5JkdU6-IDq_8XxeuwuXe8GR7naRcg3Ou2YYLR_3W-jZc6hbwWHcu6Tp8f4FgMq-_Yfts0QfSdsDIVi2rUOlpZT4yH9jMcHhqXbfYNKPAWkQiTfXqBpOezYJRhNkTRqwQLYoeQ1OZrb62jNgqFv48jbMM1aZt8S_xaz0f4tpJcJi_W2TJaNGYubl2iJaWfe7OOLBTwvLlDXhzePD66bOwv-IhNEXEVyE6X0nJdVoqtHMcWiOpFrbiQqFlUhVaREVpbJapxJjIOFWp3JHHlrjY5lmW2PQmbDZt424D01XO0dNHEy5XWSoqHYtKmMgqtKHiWNkA4mHUpen5z-kajk_S-0GikN3wSBwe6YdHigAerev07-uvpfdJmNYlibnb_9Au3sseCKTlJk15bCMrdFY6tMciYROXGxEXVhfYyEMSRUn4go9nVH9MAjtJTF1yryhL2uvM4wB2RiURF8w4exBm2ePSUiZFSmxK6CQHcH-dTTUp1q5x7QmVScoIrcw0CuBWJ_vrLqU5utciygPgo1kx6vM4p6k_eNZyIehmtDKAx8PcOH2sP7_TO_9W_C5cTPz0SsI424HN1eLE3YPz5suqXi4msMGPuf8UE9jaP5jOXk78IgymZs-PZu8mHkl-AF9BbUI
linkProvider Springer Nature
linkToHtml http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMw1V1Lb9QwELbKFgkkxPsRKGAkEAeIGjsvBwmh8qi6arvsoUjlZPwKRLCbsrulgh_FiR_IjJPsskX01gO3ZG0nsXfm-8b2eIaQh87xUuciCpVicZjkURrqBG5drJwDPmdKC59sIh8MxP5-MVwhP7uzMOhW2WGiB2pbG1wjX-dZjHFgwLx_cfA1xKxRuLvapdBoxGLbfT-CKdv0ef81_L-PON98s_dqK2yzCoQmi_JZCPY-L3IdFwqo1QEBxlrYMhcKyLDMtIiywtgkUdyYyDhVqtThJIE7ZtMk4TaG554hq3CZRj2yOuzvDt932J9gcPnuaI7I1qfAEOj6wNH9gRVJKJboz2cJ-JsL_iDD446ax3ZrPQluXvrfhu8yudia23Sj0Y8rZMWNr5ILzVolbY5gXSO_3gJujqof0GU6aX2GGw6gs5qWwO9amc_U-3BTkMRKVzU8j6IPMYCuxnbVGG594A6KznTPKAbAqEHLKMwK6OyophiYY-KPDjlLwUKwNbwSLqtR58KPOkJ9GpUpxfVx6kbaATFYetAc56CL2OzT6-TdqQzcDdIb12N3i1BdpnkR5WCtpiqJRamZKIWJrAJzkTFlA8I6IZOmDfWOGUe-SD_lE5lsBFOCYEovmFIE5Mm8TTteJ9Z-ibI7r4lByv0P9eSjbDFP2tzEcc5sZIVOCgemZyQsd6kRLLM6g4c8RsmXCKXweUa1J0KgkxiUTG5kRYHbuikLyNpSTYBAs1zcCb1sIXgqFxIfkAfzYmyJboVjVx9iHV5EYFDHUUBuNqo271KcsgxQKw1IvqSES31eLhlXn3yAdiEwCVwRkKedui4-699jevvkXtwn57b2dnfkTn-wfYec5x5UeMiSNdKbTQ7dXXLWfJtV08m9FpQo-XDaivwb4rrLaw
linkToPdf http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Zb9QwELagoAoJcZQrUMBISDxAVCdxYoe3clQgYKm41DfLVyCCTardFCR-Fz-QGSfZNuWQEG9JbCdxPP5mJp75TMhd79PKCMlirZMs5oLlseFw6jPtPejzRBsZNpsQs5nc2yt3j2Txh2j3cUmyz2lAlqam29p3VT_FZbG1BOTFkIIUwwrADY_lSXKKgyeDQV1v3n4YsZgj2fuYKvPbdhN1FFj7f8XmI8rpeODksdXToJR2zv9_dy6Qc4NBSrd7CbpITvhmg6y_GpbcN8jZ_sce7fOVLpEfrwFk5vV3eBZdDAG2PWDSrqUVKEOj7WcaAp4pDFtt6hZuTTHgFhDKYLu6gdPAckEx8uwhRbaIFkSSgglNu28tRRaLRciz8Y6COnUtPBIO6_kY744CRcOeI0uKP5OpnxsPKOrofp_7QA-JzJeXyfudp-8eP4uHrR9iWzDRxeCUpaUwWanB_vFgpWRGukpIDRZLVRjJitI6znVqLbNeVzr36MmlPnE556nLrpC1pm38NUJNlYuSCTDtcs0zWZlEVtIyp8G2ShLtIpKMEqDswIuO23N8UcE_koXqh0fB8KgwPEpG5P6qzfC9_lr7EQrWqiYyeocL7eKjGgBCOWGzTCSOOWl46cFOY9KlPrcyKZwp4Cb3UCwV4g68ntVD-gR0Ehm81HZRlrgGmicR2ZzUBLyw0-JRsNWAV0uVFhmyLIHzHJE7q2JsiTF4jW8PsE5aMrA-MxaRq_08WHUpy8HtliyPiJjMkEmfpyVN_SmwmUuJO6aVEXkwzpPD1_rzN73-b9Vvk_XdJzvq5fPZixvkTBpmWhonfJOsdYsDf5Octl-7erm4FeDjJ1S7cvo
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimizing+responsiveness+to+feedback+about+antibiotic+prescribing+in+primary+care%3A+protocol+for+two+interrelated+randomized+implementation+trials+with+embedded+process+evaluations&rft.jtitle=Implementation+science+%3A+IS&rft.au=Shuldiner%2C+Jennifer&rft.au=Schwartz%2C+Kevin+L.&rft.au=Langford%2C+Bradley+J.&rft.au=Ivers%2C+Noah+M.&rft.date=2022-02-14&rft.pub=BioMed+Central&rft.eissn=1748-5908&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=1&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs13012-022-01194-8&rft.externalDocID=10_1186_s13012_022_01194_8
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1748-5908&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1748-5908&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1748-5908&client=summon