Economic evaluation of type 2 diabetes prevention programmes: Markov model of low- and high-intensity lifestyle programmes and metformin in participants with different categories of intermediate hyperglycaemia

Background National guidance on preventing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in the UK recommends low-intensity lifestyle interventions for individuals with intermediate categories of hyperglycaemia defined in terms of impaired fasting glucose (IFG) or ‘at-risk’ levels of HbA1c. In a recent systematic...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:BMC medicine Ročník 16; číslo 1; s. 16 - 12
Hlavní autoři: Roberts, Samantha, Craig, Dawn, Adler, Amanda, McPherson, Klim, Greenhalgh, Trisha
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: London BioMed Central 30.01.2018
BioMed Central Ltd
BMC
Témata:
ISSN:1741-7015, 1741-7015
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Abstract Background National guidance on preventing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in the UK recommends low-intensity lifestyle interventions for individuals with intermediate categories of hyperglycaemia defined in terms of impaired fasting glucose (IFG) or ‘at-risk’ levels of HbA1c. In a recent systematic review of economic evaluations of such interventions, most studies had evaluated intensive trial-based lifestyle programmes in participants with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT). This study examines the costs and effects of different intensity lifestyle programmes and metformin in participants with different categories of intermediate hyperglycaemia. Methods We developed a decision tree and Markov model (50-year horizon) to compare four approaches, namely (1) a low-intensity lifestyle programme based on current NICE guidance, (2) a high-intensity lifestyle programme based on the US Diabetes Prevention Program, (3) metformin, and (4) no intervention, modelled for three different types of intermediate hyperglycaemia (IFG, IGT and HbA1c). A health system perspective was adopted and incremental analysis undertaken at an individual and population-wide level, taking England as a case study. Results Low-intensity lifestyle programmes were the most cost-effective (£44/QALY, £195/QALY and £186/QALY compared to no intervention in IGT, IFG and HbA1c, respectively). Intensive lifestyle interventions were also cost-effective compared to no intervention (£2775/QALY, £6820/QALY and £7376/QALY, respectively, in IGT, IFG and HbA1c). Metformin was cost-effective relative to no intervention (£5224/QALY, £6842/QALY and £372/QALY in IGT, IFG and HbA1c, respectively), but was only cost-effective relative to other treatments in participants identified with HbA1c. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of £20,000/QALY, low- and high-intensity lifestyle programmes were cost-effective 98%, 99% and 98% and 81%, 81% and 71% of the time in IGT, IFG and HbA1c, respectively. An England-wide programme for 50–59 year olds could reduce T2DM incidence by < 3.5% over 50 years and would cost 0.2–5.2% of the current diabetes budget for 2–9 years. Discussion This analysis suggests that current English national policy of low-intensity lifestyle programmes in participants with IFG or HbA1c will be cost-effective and have the most favourable budget impact, but will prevent only a fraction of cases of T2DM. Additional approaches to prevention need to be investigated urgently.
AbstractList National guidance on preventing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in the UK recommends low-intensity lifestyle interventions for individuals with intermediate categories of hyperglycaemia defined in terms of impaired fasting glucose (IFG) or 'at-risk' levels of HbA1c. In a recent systematic review of economic evaluations of such interventions, most studies had evaluated intensive trial-based lifestyle programmes in participants with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT). This study examines the costs and effects of different intensity lifestyle programmes and metformin in participants with different categories of intermediate hyperglycaemia. We developed a decision tree and Markov model (50-year horizon) to compare four approaches, namely (1) a low-intensity lifestyle programme based on current NICE guidance, (2) a high-intensity lifestyle programme based on the US Diabetes Prevention Program, (3) metformin, and (4) no intervention, modelled for three different types of intermediate hyperglycaemia (IFG, IGT and HbA1c). A health system perspective was adopted and incremental analysis undertaken at an individual and population-wide level, taking England as a case study. Low-intensity lifestyle programmes were the most cost-effective ([pounds sterling]44/QALY, [pounds sterling]195/QALY and [pounds sterling]186/QALY compared to no intervention in IGT, IFG and HbA1c, respectively). Intensive lifestyle interventions were also cost-effective compared to no intervention ([pounds sterling]2775/QALY, [pounds sterling]6820/QALY and [pounds sterling]7376/QALY, respectively, in IGT, IFG and HbA1c). Metformin was cost-effective relative to no intervention ([pounds sterling]5224/QALY, [pounds sterling]6842/QALY and [pounds sterling]372/QALY in IGT, IFG and HbA1c, respectively), but was only cost-effective relative to other treatments in participants identified with HbA1c. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of [pounds sterling]20,000/QALY, low- and high-intensity lifestyle programmes were cost-effective 98%, 99% and 98% and 81%, 81% and 71% of the time in IGT, IFG and HbA1c, respectively. An England-wide programme for 50-59 year olds could reduce T2DM incidence by < 3.5% over 50 years and would cost 0.2-5.2% of the current diabetes budget for 2-9 years. This analysis suggests that current English national policy of low-intensity lifestyle programmes in participants with IFG or HbA1c will be cost-effective and have the most favourable budget impact, but will prevent only a fraction of cases of T2DM. Additional approaches to prevention need to be investigated urgently.
Background National guidance on preventing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in the UK recommends low-intensity lifestyle interventions for individuals with intermediate categories of hyperglycaemia defined in terms of impaired fasting glucose (IFG) or 'at-risk' levels of HbA1c. In a recent systematic review of economic evaluations of such interventions, most studies had evaluated intensive trial-based lifestyle programmes in participants with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT). This study examines the costs and effects of different intensity lifestyle programmes and metformin in participants with different categories of intermediate hyperglycaemia. Methods We developed a decision tree and Markov model (50-year horizon) to compare four approaches, namely (1) a low-intensity lifestyle programme based on current NICE guidance, (2) a high-intensity lifestyle programme based on the US Diabetes Prevention Program, (3) metformin, and (4) no intervention, modelled for three different types of intermediate hyperglycaemia (IFG, IGT and HbA1c). A health system perspective was adopted and incremental analysis undertaken at an individual and population-wide level, taking England as a case study. Results Low-intensity lifestyle programmes were the most cost-effective ([pounds sterling]44/QALY, [pounds sterling]195/QALY and [pounds sterling]186/QALY compared to no intervention in IGT, IFG and HbA1c, respectively). Intensive lifestyle interventions were also cost-effective compared to no intervention ([pounds sterling]2775/QALY, [pounds sterling]6820/QALY and [pounds sterling]7376/QALY, respectively, in IGT, IFG and HbA1c). Metformin was cost-effective relative to no intervention ([pounds sterling]5224/QALY, [pounds sterling]6842/QALY and [pounds sterling]372/QALY in IGT, IFG and HbA1c, respectively), but was only cost-effective relative to other treatments in participants identified with HbA1c. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of [pounds sterling]20,000/QALY, low- and high-intensity lifestyle programmes were cost-effective 98%, 99% and 98% and 81%, 81% and 71% of the time in IGT, IFG and HbA1c, respectively. An England-wide programme for 50-59 year olds could reduce T2DM incidence by < 3.5% over 50 years and would cost 0.2-5.2% of the current diabetes budget for 2-9 years. Discussion This analysis suggests that current English national policy of low-intensity lifestyle programmes in participants with IFG or HbA1c will be cost-effective and have the most favourable budget impact, but will prevent only a fraction of cases of T2DM. Additional approaches to prevention need to be investigated urgently. Keywords: Diabetes prevention, Prediabetes, Intermediate hyperglycaemia, Economic evaluation, Impaired fasting glucose, Impaired glucose tolerance, HbA1c in at-risk range, Cost-effective
National guidance on preventing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in the UK recommends low-intensity lifestyle interventions for individuals with intermediate categories of hyperglycaemia defined in terms of impaired fasting glucose (IFG) or 'at-risk' levels of HbA1c. In a recent systematic review of economic evaluations of such interventions, most studies had evaluated intensive trial-based lifestyle programmes in participants with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT). This study examines the costs and effects of different intensity lifestyle programmes and metformin in participants with different categories of intermediate hyperglycaemia.BACKGROUNDNational guidance on preventing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in the UK recommends low-intensity lifestyle interventions for individuals with intermediate categories of hyperglycaemia defined in terms of impaired fasting glucose (IFG) or 'at-risk' levels of HbA1c. In a recent systematic review of economic evaluations of such interventions, most studies had evaluated intensive trial-based lifestyle programmes in participants with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT). This study examines the costs and effects of different intensity lifestyle programmes and metformin in participants with different categories of intermediate hyperglycaemia.We developed a decision tree and Markov model (50-year horizon) to compare four approaches, namely (1) a low-intensity lifestyle programme based on current NICE guidance, (2) a high-intensity lifestyle programme based on the US Diabetes Prevention Program, (3) metformin, and (4) no intervention, modelled for three different types of intermediate hyperglycaemia (IFG, IGT and HbA1c). A health system perspective was adopted and incremental analysis undertaken at an individual and population-wide level, taking England as a case study.METHODSWe developed a decision tree and Markov model (50-year horizon) to compare four approaches, namely (1) a low-intensity lifestyle programme based on current NICE guidance, (2) a high-intensity lifestyle programme based on the US Diabetes Prevention Program, (3) metformin, and (4) no intervention, modelled for three different types of intermediate hyperglycaemia (IFG, IGT and HbA1c). A health system perspective was adopted and incremental analysis undertaken at an individual and population-wide level, taking England as a case study.Low-intensity lifestyle programmes were the most cost-effective (£44/QALY, £195/QALY and £186/QALY compared to no intervention in IGT, IFG and HbA1c, respectively). Intensive lifestyle interventions were also cost-effective compared to no intervention (£2775/QALY, £6820/QALY and £7376/QALY, respectively, in IGT, IFG and HbA1c). Metformin was cost-effective relative to no intervention (£5224/QALY, £6842/QALY and £372/QALY in IGT, IFG and HbA1c, respectively), but was only cost-effective relative to other treatments in participants identified with HbA1c. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of £20,000/QALY, low- and high-intensity lifestyle programmes were cost-effective 98%, 99% and 98% and 81%, 81% and 71% of the time in IGT, IFG and HbA1c, respectively. An England-wide programme for 50-59 year olds could reduce T2DM incidence by < 3.5% over 50 years and would cost 0.2-5.2% of the current diabetes budget for 2-9 years.RESULTSLow-intensity lifestyle programmes were the most cost-effective (£44/QALY, £195/QALY and £186/QALY compared to no intervention in IGT, IFG and HbA1c, respectively). Intensive lifestyle interventions were also cost-effective compared to no intervention (£2775/QALY, £6820/QALY and £7376/QALY, respectively, in IGT, IFG and HbA1c). Metformin was cost-effective relative to no intervention (£5224/QALY, £6842/QALY and £372/QALY in IGT, IFG and HbA1c, respectively), but was only cost-effective relative to other treatments in participants identified with HbA1c. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of £20,000/QALY, low- and high-intensity lifestyle programmes were cost-effective 98%, 99% and 98% and 81%, 81% and 71% of the time in IGT, IFG and HbA1c, respectively. An England-wide programme for 50-59 year olds could reduce T2DM incidence by < 3.5% over 50 years and would cost 0.2-5.2% of the current diabetes budget for 2-9 years.This analysis suggests that current English national policy of low-intensity lifestyle programmes in participants with IFG or HbA1c will be cost-effective and have the most favourable budget impact, but will prevent only a fraction of cases of T2DM. Additional approaches to prevention need to be investigated urgently.DISCUSSIONThis analysis suggests that current English national policy of low-intensity lifestyle programmes in participants with IFG or HbA1c will be cost-effective and have the most favourable budget impact, but will prevent only a fraction of cases of T2DM. Additional approaches to prevention need to be investigated urgently.
Background National guidance on preventing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in the UK recommends low-intensity lifestyle interventions for individuals with intermediate categories of hyperglycaemia defined in terms of impaired fasting glucose (IFG) or ‘at-risk’ levels of HbA1c. In a recent systematic review of economic evaluations of such interventions, most studies had evaluated intensive trial-based lifestyle programmes in participants with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT). This study examines the costs and effects of different intensity lifestyle programmes and metformin in participants with different categories of intermediate hyperglycaemia. Methods We developed a decision tree and Markov model (50-year horizon) to compare four approaches, namely (1) a low-intensity lifestyle programme based on current NICE guidance, (2) a high-intensity lifestyle programme based on the US Diabetes Prevention Program, (3) metformin, and (4) no intervention, modelled for three different types of intermediate hyperglycaemia (IFG, IGT and HbA1c). A health system perspective was adopted and incremental analysis undertaken at an individual and population-wide level, taking England as a case study. Results Low-intensity lifestyle programmes were the most cost-effective (£44/QALY, £195/QALY and £186/QALY compared to no intervention in IGT, IFG and HbA1c, respectively). Intensive lifestyle interventions were also cost-effective compared to no intervention (£2775/QALY, £6820/QALY and £7376/QALY, respectively, in IGT, IFG and HbA1c). Metformin was cost-effective relative to no intervention (£5224/QALY, £6842/QALY and £372/QALY in IGT, IFG and HbA1c, respectively), but was only cost-effective relative to other treatments in participants identified with HbA1c. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of £20,000/QALY, low- and high-intensity lifestyle programmes were cost-effective 98%, 99% and 98% and 81%, 81% and 71% of the time in IGT, IFG and HbA1c, respectively. An England-wide programme for 50–59 year olds could reduce T2DM incidence by < 3.5% over 50 years and would cost 0.2–5.2% of the current diabetes budget for 2–9 years. Discussion This analysis suggests that current English national policy of low-intensity lifestyle programmes in participants with IFG or HbA1c will be cost-effective and have the most favourable budget impact, but will prevent only a fraction of cases of T2DM. Additional approaches to prevention need to be investigated urgently.
National guidance on preventing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in the UK recommends low-intensity lifestyle interventions for individuals with intermediate categories of hyperglycaemia defined in terms of impaired fasting glucose (IFG) or 'at-risk' levels of HbA1c. In a recent systematic review of economic evaluations of such interventions, most studies had evaluated intensive trial-based lifestyle programmes in participants with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT). This study examines the costs and effects of different intensity lifestyle programmes and metformin in participants with different categories of intermediate hyperglycaemia. We developed a decision tree and Markov model (50-year horizon) to compare four approaches, namely (1) a low-intensity lifestyle programme based on current NICE guidance, (2) a high-intensity lifestyle programme based on the US Diabetes Prevention Program, (3) metformin, and (4) no intervention, modelled for three different types of intermediate hyperglycaemia (IFG, IGT and HbA1c). A health system perspective was adopted and incremental analysis undertaken at an individual and population-wide level, taking England as a case study. Low-intensity lifestyle programmes were the most cost-effective (£44/QALY, £195/QALY and £186/QALY compared to no intervention in IGT, IFG and HbA1c, respectively). Intensive lifestyle interventions were also cost-effective compared to no intervention (£2775/QALY, £6820/QALY and £7376/QALY, respectively, in IGT, IFG and HbA1c). Metformin was cost-effective relative to no intervention (£5224/QALY, £6842/QALY and £372/QALY in IGT, IFG and HbA1c, respectively), but was only cost-effective relative to other treatments in participants identified with HbA1c. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of £20,000/QALY, low- and high-intensity lifestyle programmes were cost-effective 98%, 99% and 98% and 81%, 81% and 71% of the time in IGT, IFG and HbA1c, respectively. An England-wide programme for 50-59 year olds could reduce T2DM incidence by < 3.5% over 50 years and would cost 0.2-5.2% of the current diabetes budget for 2-9 years. This analysis suggests that current English national policy of low-intensity lifestyle programmes in participants with IFG or HbA1c will be cost-effective and have the most favourable budget impact, but will prevent only a fraction of cases of T2DM. Additional approaches to prevention need to be investigated urgently.
Abstract Background National guidance on preventing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in the UK recommends low-intensity lifestyle interventions for individuals with intermediate categories of hyperglycaemia defined in terms of impaired fasting glucose (IFG) or ‘at-risk’ levels of HbA1c. In a recent systematic review of economic evaluations of such interventions, most studies had evaluated intensive trial-based lifestyle programmes in participants with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT). This study examines the costs and effects of different intensity lifestyle programmes and metformin in participants with different categories of intermediate hyperglycaemia. Methods We developed a decision tree and Markov model (50-year horizon) to compare four approaches, namely (1) a low-intensity lifestyle programme based on current NICE guidance, (2) a high-intensity lifestyle programme based on the US Diabetes Prevention Program, (3) metformin, and (4) no intervention, modelled for three different types of intermediate hyperglycaemia (IFG, IGT and HbA1c). A health system perspective was adopted and incremental analysis undertaken at an individual and population-wide level, taking England as a case study. Results Low-intensity lifestyle programmes were the most cost-effective (£44/QALY, £195/QALY and £186/QALY compared to no intervention in IGT, IFG and HbA1c, respectively). Intensive lifestyle interventions were also cost-effective compared to no intervention (£2775/QALY, £6820/QALY and £7376/QALY, respectively, in IGT, IFG and HbA1c). Metformin was cost-effective relative to no intervention (£5224/QALY, £6842/QALY and £372/QALY in IGT, IFG and HbA1c, respectively), but was only cost-effective relative to other treatments in participants identified with HbA1c. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of £20,000/QALY, low- and high-intensity lifestyle programmes were cost-effective 98%, 99% and 98% and 81%, 81% and 71% of the time in IGT, IFG and HbA1c, respectively. An England-wide programme for 50–59 year olds could reduce T2DM incidence by < 3.5% over 50 years and would cost 0.2–5.2% of the current diabetes budget for 2–9 years. Discussion This analysis suggests that current English national policy of low-intensity lifestyle programmes in participants with IFG or HbA1c will be cost-effective and have the most favourable budget impact, but will prevent only a fraction of cases of T2DM. Additional approaches to prevention need to be investigated urgently.
ArticleNumber 16
Audience Academic
Author Greenhalgh, Trisha
McPherson, Klim
Craig, Dawn
Adler, Amanda
Roberts, Samantha
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Samantha
  surname: Roberts
  fullname: Roberts, Samantha
  email: samantha.roberts@gtc.ox.ac.uk
  organization: Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Primary Care Building, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Dawn
  surname: Craig
  fullname: Craig, Dawn
  organization: Institute of Health & Society, University of Newcastle
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Amanda
  surname: Adler
  fullname: Adler, Amanda
  organization: Addenbrooke’s Hospital
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Klim
  surname: McPherson
  fullname: McPherson, Klim
  organization: Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Primary Care Building, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Trisha
  surname: Greenhalgh
  fullname: Greenhalgh, Trisha
  organization: Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Primary Care Building, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29378576$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9Ul9r1TAcLTJxf_QD-CIBQXzpbJq2aXwYjDF1MPFFn0Oa_tJmpklNcu-4H9NvZHrvHPeKjBYaknPO75z0nGZH1lnIste4OMe4bT4EXDLc5AWmecHaKq-eZSeYVjinBa6P9tbH2WkId0VR1pRWL7LjkhHa1rQ5yX5fS2fdpCWCtTArEbWzyCkUNzOgEvVadBAhoNnDGuz2dPZu8GKaIHxEX4X_6dZocj2YhWbcfY6E7dGohzHXNoINOm6Q0QpC3BjYY29xE0Tl_KQtSu8sfNRSz8LGgO51HNN8pcCnwUiKCIPzOvHSnEXZT5DsRUBj8uoHs5ECJi1eZs-VMAFePXzPsh-frr9ffclvv32-ubq8zWVTNDHHwDqo2xKriggMRNSkLgQjqm8Vq2vB-grXVdmUDWsq2Zekx7inUhDZScJ6TM6ym51u78Qdn72ehN9wJzTfbjg_8G0cA5zWpOsL2qkG2kphKprkQXXLz2ONUkXSuthpzasupZIpsBfmQPTwxOqRD27Na8pazGgSeP8g4N2vVbpqPukgwRhhwa0Cx4yRArckOTnL3u6gg0jWtFUuKcoFzi_rqiGMNZgk1Pl_UOnp0x2nyoDSaf-A8G6PMIIwcQzOrJbKhEPgm_2sjyH_djIB8A4gvQvBg3qE4IIvvee73vPUe770nleJQ__hSB23ZU62tXmSWe6YIU2xA3h-51bepuY8QfoDV0wboQ
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1080_14735784_2018_1543606
crossref_primary_10_1177_2047487319880041
crossref_primary_10_1016_S2213_8587_22_00186_3
crossref_primary_10_1186_s44247_025_00194_0
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00125_020_05224_2
crossref_primary_10_1080_03007995_2021_1955667
crossref_primary_10_1080_14737167_2020_1688146
crossref_primary_10_1002_ptr_6386
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40274_018_4690_z
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00508_019_1450_4
crossref_primary_10_1186_s43094_025_00811_9
crossref_primary_10_1007_s41669_024_00487_6
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00125_024_06330_1
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_019_42574_3
crossref_primary_10_1007_s13300_020_00906_x
crossref_primary_10_1111_dme_13867
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00392_025_02608_5
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jval_2024_08_003
crossref_primary_10_1080_14737167_2021_1895755
crossref_primary_10_3390_endocrines3040062
crossref_primary_10_1111_obr_12821
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00508_022_02122_y
crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjdrc_2024_004382
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdiacomp_2019_107444
crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph16101677
crossref_primary_10_1155_2020_7410797
crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2019_033483
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_seps_2023_101552
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40258_024_00914_z
crossref_primary_10_1007_s41669_021_00284_5
Cites_doi 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.1009
10.2337/dc10-0843
10.1186/s12955-014-0150-z
10.2337/dc16-S003
10.1136/bmjdrc-2015-000172
10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017184
10.1111/j.1464-5491.2012.03698.x
10.1056/NEJMoa012512
10.1016/j.diabres.2012.03.009
10.1007/s00125-005-0097-z
10.2337/diacare.20.4.537
10.1016/j.diabres.2010.06.008
10.1007/s40273-015-0327-2
10.1136/bmj.g4485
10.1186/s13012-015-0354-6
10.7326/M15-0452
10.2337/diacare.26.3.688
10.2337/dc14-0886
10.2337/dc13-1954
10.1097/MLR.0b013e31815b9772
10.1155/2016/2159890
10.3390/ijerph7083150
10.1136/bmj.i6538
10.1007/s00125-013-2902-4
10.2337/diacare.26.12.3230
10.1007/s00125-009-1443-3
10.7326/0003-4819-142-5-200503010-00007
10.1016/S2213-8587(15)00291-0
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright The Author(s). 2018
COPYRIGHT 2018 BioMed Central Ltd.
Copyright_xml – notice: The Author(s). 2018
– notice: COPYRIGHT 2018 BioMed Central Ltd.
DBID C6C
AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.1186/s12916-017-0984-4
DatabaseName Springer Nature OA Free Journals
CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList

MEDLINE - Academic

MEDLINE


Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1741-7015
EndPage 12
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_753bd07bf6e84f17a6c60fb291696ff0
PMC5798197
A546399613
29378576
10_1186_s12916_017_0984_4
Genre Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
GeographicLocations United Kingdom
GeographicLocations_xml – name: United Kingdom
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: National Institute for Health Research
  grantid: Oxford Biomedical Research Centre
  funderid: https://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000272
– fundername: National Institute for Health Research
  grantid: Oxford Biomedical Research Centre
– fundername: ;
  grantid: Oxford Biomedical Research Centre
GroupedDBID ---
0R~
23N
2WC
4.4
53G
5GY
5VS
6J9
6PF
7X7
88E
8FI
8FJ
AAFWJ
AAJSJ
AASML
AAWTL
ABDBF
ABUWG
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACIHN
ACPRK
ACUHS
ADBBV
ADRAZ
ADUKV
AEAQA
AENEX
AFKRA
AFPKN
AFRAH
AHBYD
AHMBA
AHYZX
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMKLP
AMTXH
AOIJS
BAPOH
BAWUL
BCNDV
BENPR
BFQNJ
BMC
BPHCQ
BVXVI
C6C
CCPQU
CS3
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EAD
EAP
EAS
EBD
EBLON
EBS
EJD
EMB
EMK
EMOBN
ESX
F5P
FYUFA
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
H13
HMCUK
HYE
IAO
IHR
IHW
INH
INR
ITC
KQ8
M1P
M48
MK0
M~E
O5R
O5S
OK1
OVT
P2P
PGMZT
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PJZUB
PPXIY
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
PUEGO
RBZ
RNS
ROL
RPM
RSV
SMD
SOJ
SV3
TR2
TUS
UKHRP
WOQ
WOW
XSB
AAYXX
AFFHD
CITATION
-5E
-5G
-A0
-BR
3V.
ACRMQ
ADINQ
ALIPV
C24
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c606t-1e9be5821f43a1e3a5350a93fd8f955a9d41542626964cd23d11d7ca3cbc39d13
IEDL.DBID RSV
ISICitedReferencesCount 39
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000423747000001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 1741-7015
IngestDate Tue Oct 14 18:50:47 EDT 2025
Tue Nov 04 02:03:24 EST 2025
Sun Nov 09 14:21:38 EST 2025
Tue Nov 11 10:02:42 EST 2025
Tue Nov 04 17:44:29 EST 2025
Thu May 22 21:23:48 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 19 02:43:47 EST 2025
Tue Nov 18 21:40:38 EST 2025
Sat Nov 29 02:30:45 EST 2025
Sat Sep 06 07:29:17 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords Impaired fasting glucose
Economic evaluation
HbA1c in at-risk range
Prediabetes
Intermediate hyperglycaemia
Diabetes prevention
Impaired glucose tolerance
Cost-effective
Language English
License Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c606t-1e9be5821f43a1e3a5350a93fd8f955a9d41542626964cd23d11d7ca3cbc39d13
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://link.springer.com/10.1186/s12916-017-0984-4
PMID 29378576
PQID 1993018375
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 12
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_753bd07bf6e84f17a6c60fb291696ff0
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5798197
proquest_miscellaneous_1993018375
gale_infotracmisc_A546399613
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A546399613
gale_healthsolutions_A546399613
pubmed_primary_29378576
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12916_017_0984_4
crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_s12916_017_0984_4
springer_journals_10_1186_s12916_017_0984_4
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2018-01-30
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2018-01-30
PublicationDate_xml – month: 01
  year: 2018
  text: 2018-01-30
  day: 30
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace London
PublicationPlace_xml – name: London
– name: England
PublicationTitle BMC medicine
PublicationTitleAbbrev BMC Med
PublicationTitleAlternate BMC Med
PublicationYear 2018
Publisher BioMed Central
BioMed Central Ltd
BMC
Publisher_xml – name: BioMed Central
– name: BioMed Central Ltd
– name: BMC
References S Saha (984_CR17) 2010; 7
J Lindström (984_CR4) 2003; 26
NB Ashra (984_CR21) 2015
N Hex (984_CR37) 2012; 29
984_CR36
984_CR15
984_CR12
984_CR34
984_CR13
984_CR32
SA Mostafa (984_CR28) 2010; 90
P Vemer (984_CR41) 2016; 34
WH Herman (984_CR33) 2005; 142
International Diabetes Federation (984_CR1) 2015
A Ramachandran (984_CR5) 2006; 49
KI Radl (984_CR19) 2013; 10
EDE Group (984_CR30) 2003; 26
Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group (984_CR31) 2015; 3
Office of National Statistics (984_CR29) 2014
K Faerch (984_CR9) 2009; 52
The Community Guide (984_CR14) 2014
WC Knowler (984_CR2) 2002; 346
984_CR20
984_CR42
R Li (984_CR18) 2010; 33
World Health Organization (984_CR26) 2011
J Usher-Smith (984_CR25) 2017
XR Pan (984_CR3) 1997; 20
984_CR27
A Neumann (984_CR40) 2014; 12
JS Yudkin (984_CR11) 2014; 349
984_CR23
984_CR24
C Bachle (984_CR38) 2016; 4
National Institute of Clinical Excellence (984_CR22) 2013
R Kahn (984_CR7) 2014; 37
E Barry (984_CR8) 2017; 4
Diabetes UK (984_CR43) 2016
MK Ali (984_CR6) 2012; 1
D Morris (984_CR10) 2013; 56
K Alouki (984_CR16) 2016; 2016
K Khunti (984_CR35) 2012; 97
GA Nichols (984_CR39) 2008; 46
22537247 - Diabet Med. 2012 Jul;29(7):855-62
24652724 - Diabetes Care. 2014 Apr;37(4):943-9
18388843 - Med Care. 2008 Mar;46(3):287-92
15738451 - Ann Intern Med. 2005 Mar 1;142(5):323-32
26670418 - Implement Sci. 2015 Dec 15;10:172
20633944 - Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2010 Oct;90(1):100-8
20948954 - Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2010 Aug;7(8):3150-95
12610023 - Diabetes Care. 2003 Mar;26(3):688-96
26167912 - Ann Intern Med. 2015 Sep 15;163(6):437-51
22232096 - Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Jan;31(1):67-75
16391903 - Diabetologia. 2006 Feb;49(2):289-97
11832527 - N Engl J Med. 2002 Feb 7;346(6):393-403
23584433 - Diabetologia. 2013 Jul;56(7):1489-93
9096977 - Diabetes Care. 1997 Apr;20(4):537-44
25342083 - Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014 Oct 24;12:150
20668156 - Diabetes Care. 2010 Aug;33(8):1872-94
27252871 - BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2016 May 25;4(1):e000172
26696680 - Diabetes Care. 2016 Jan;39 Suppl 1:S4-5
19590846 - Diabetologia. 2009 Sep;52(9):1714-23
25028385 - BMJ. 2014 Jul 15;349:g4485
28052845 - BMJ. 2017 Jan 4;356:i6538
25336746 - Diabetes Care. 2015 Jan;38(1):51-8
26377054 - Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2015 Nov;3(11):866-75
14633807 - Diabetes Care. 2003 Dec;26(12):3230-6
29146638 - BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 15;7(11):e017184
26885527 - J Diabetes Res. 2016;2016:2159890
22554999 - Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2012 Sep;97(3):505-13
26660529 - Pharmacoeconomics. 2016 Apr;34(4):349-61
References_xml – volume: 1
  start-page: 67
  issue: 31
  year: 2012
  ident: 984_CR6
  publication-title: Health Aff
  doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.1009
– volume-title: Diabetes prevention and control: combined diet and physical activity promotion programs to prevent type 2 diabetes among people at increased risk
  year: 2014
  ident: 984_CR14
– volume: 33
  start-page: 1872
  issue: 8
  year: 2010
  ident: 984_CR18
  publication-title: Diabetes Care
  doi: 10.2337/dc10-0843
– volume-title: Guide to the Technology Appraisal Process
  year: 2013
  ident: 984_CR22
– ident: 984_CR34
– ident: 984_CR36
– ident: 984_CR13
– volume: 12
  start-page: 150
  year: 2014
  ident: 984_CR40
  publication-title: Health Qual Life Outcomes
  doi: 10.1186/s12955-014-0150-z
– ident: 984_CR32
– ident: 984_CR27
  doi: 10.2337/dc16-S003
– volume: 4
  start-page: e000172
  issue: 1
  year: 2016
  ident: 984_CR38
  publication-title: BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care
  doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2015-000172
– ident: 984_CR15
  doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017184
– volume: 29
  start-page: 855
  year: 2012
  ident: 984_CR37
  publication-title: Diabet Med
  doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2012.03698.x
– volume-title: Deaths registered in England and Wales
  year: 2014
  ident: 984_CR29
– volume: 346
  start-page: 393
  year: 2002
  ident: 984_CR2
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa012512
– volume: 97
  start-page: 505
  issue: 3
  year: 2012
  ident: 984_CR35
  publication-title: Diabetes Res Clin Pract
  doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2012.03.009
– volume: 10
  start-page: 2
  year: 2013
  ident: 984_CR19
  publication-title: Epidemiol Biostat Public Health
– volume: 49
  start-page: 289
  year: 2006
  ident: 984_CR5
  publication-title: Diabetologia
  doi: 10.1007/s00125-005-0097-z
– volume: 20
  start-page: 537
  year: 1997
  ident: 984_CR3
  publication-title: Diabetes Care
  doi: 10.2337/diacare.20.4.537
– volume: 90
  start-page: 100
  issue: 1
  year: 2010
  ident: 984_CR28
  publication-title: Diabetes Res Clin Pract
  doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2010.06.008
– volume: 34
  start-page: 349
  year: 2016
  ident: 984_CR41
  publication-title: Pharmacoeconomics
  doi: 10.1007/s40273-015-0327-2
– volume: 349
  start-page: g4485
  year: 2014
  ident: 984_CR11
  publication-title: BMJ
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.g4485
– ident: 984_CR24
  doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0354-6
– ident: 984_CR20
  doi: 10.7326/M15-0452
– volume: 26
  start-page: 688
  issue: 3
  year: 2003
  ident: 984_CR30
  publication-title: Diabetes Care
  doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.3.688
– ident: 984_CR12
  doi: 10.2337/dc14-0886
– volume: 37
  start-page: 943
  issue: 4
  year: 2014
  ident: 984_CR7
  publication-title: Diabetes Care
  doi: 10.2337/dc13-1954
– volume: 46
  start-page: 287
  issue: 3
  year: 2008
  ident: 984_CR39
  publication-title: Med Care
  doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31815b9772
– volume-title: International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas
  year: 2015
  ident: 984_CR1
– volume-title: Diabetes Prevalence 2016
  year: 2016
  ident: 984_CR43
– volume-title: Use of glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) in the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus
  year: 2011
  ident: 984_CR26
– volume: 2016
  start-page: 2159890
  year: 2016
  ident: 984_CR16
  publication-title: J Diabetes Res
  doi: 10.1155/2016/2159890
– volume: 7
  start-page: 3150
  issue: 8
  year: 2010
  ident: 984_CR17
  publication-title: Int J Environ Res Health
  doi: 10.3390/ijerph7083150
– volume-title: A systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the effectiveness of pragmatic lifestyle interventions for the prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus in routine practice
  year: 2015
  ident: 984_CR21
– volume: 4
  start-page: i6538
  issue: 356
  year: 2017
  ident: 984_CR8
  publication-title: BMJ
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.i6538
– volume-title: NHS Health Check Programme rapid evidence synthesis
  year: 2017
  ident: 984_CR25
– volume: 56
  start-page: 1489
  issue: 7
  year: 2013
  ident: 984_CR10
  publication-title: Diabetologia
  doi: 10.1007/s00125-013-2902-4
– volume: 26
  start-page: 3230
  year: 2003
  ident: 984_CR4
  publication-title: Diabetes Care
  doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.12.3230
– volume: 52
  start-page: 1714
  year: 2009
  ident: 984_CR9
  publication-title: Diabetologica
  doi: 10.1007/s00125-009-1443-3
– volume: 142
  start-page: 323
  year: 2005
  ident: 984_CR33
  publication-title: Ann Intern Med
  doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-142-5-200503010-00007
– ident: 984_CR42
– ident: 984_CR23
– volume: 3
  start-page: 866
  issue: 11
  year: 2015
  ident: 984_CR31
  publication-title: Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol
  doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(15)00291-0
– reference: 11832527 - N Engl J Med. 2002 Feb 7;346(6):393-403
– reference: 26885527 - J Diabetes Res. 2016;2016:2159890
– reference: 14633807 - Diabetes Care. 2003 Dec;26(12):3230-6
– reference: 20948954 - Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2010 Aug;7(8):3150-95
– reference: 26167912 - Ann Intern Med. 2015 Sep 15;163(6):437-51
– reference: 29146638 - BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 15;7(11):e017184
– reference: 12610023 - Diabetes Care. 2003 Mar;26(3):688-96
– reference: 9096977 - Diabetes Care. 1997 Apr;20(4):537-44
– reference: 25342083 - Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014 Oct 24;12:150
– reference: 19590846 - Diabetologia. 2009 Sep;52(9):1714-23
– reference: 27252871 - BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2016 May 25;4(1):e000172
– reference: 18388843 - Med Care. 2008 Mar;46(3):287-92
– reference: 28052845 - BMJ. 2017 Jan 4;356:i6538
– reference: 25336746 - Diabetes Care. 2015 Jan;38(1):51-8
– reference: 26660529 - Pharmacoeconomics. 2016 Apr;34(4):349-61
– reference: 22554999 - Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2012 Sep;97(3):505-13
– reference: 23584433 - Diabetologia. 2013 Jul;56(7):1489-93
– reference: 20633944 - Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2010 Oct;90(1):100-8
– reference: 24652724 - Diabetes Care. 2014 Apr;37(4):943-9
– reference: 26670418 - Implement Sci. 2015 Dec 15;10:172
– reference: 20668156 - Diabetes Care. 2010 Aug;33(8):1872-94
– reference: 22232096 - Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Jan;31(1):67-75
– reference: 15738451 - Ann Intern Med. 2005 Mar 1;142(5):323-32
– reference: 16391903 - Diabetologia. 2006 Feb;49(2):289-97
– reference: 25028385 - BMJ. 2014 Jul 15;349:g4485
– reference: 26696680 - Diabetes Care. 2016 Jan;39 Suppl 1:S4-5
– reference: 22537247 - Diabet Med. 2012 Jul;29(7):855-62
– reference: 26377054 - Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2015 Nov;3(11):866-75
SSID ssj0025774
Score 2.3853328
Snippet Background National guidance on preventing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in the UK recommends low-intensity lifestyle interventions for individuals with...
National guidance on preventing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in the UK recommends low-intensity lifestyle interventions for individuals with intermediate...
Background National guidance on preventing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in the UK recommends low-intensity lifestyle interventions for individuals with...
Abstract Background National guidance on preventing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in the UK recommends low-intensity lifestyle interventions for individuals...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
gale
pubmed
crossref
springer
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 16
SubjectTerms Analysis
Biomedicine
Care and treatment
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - economics
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - prevention & control
Diabetes prevention
Dosage and administration
Economic aspects
Economic evaluation
Female
Health aspects
Health care costs
Humans
Hyperglycemia
Hyperglycemia - drug therapy
Impaired fasting glucose
Impaired glucose tolerance
Intermediate hyperglycaemia
Lifestyles
Male
management and treatment
Markov processes
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Metformin
Metformin - economics
Metformin - therapeutic use
Prediabetes
Prevention
Research Article
Risk factors
Type 2 diabetes
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1fi9QwEA9yiPgi_rfnqREEQSnXNGnT-HaKhy8ePijcW0jT5G5ht122vZP9mH4jZ9J0vZ6oL8I-NZNukplOZpKZ3xDyijnvrRU2zbkyqVCcgR70YMj5hnNVZ8o0VSg2IU9OqtNT9eVKqS-MCRvhgceFOwRzum4yWfvSVcIzaUpbZr7OwaxRpffBW8-kmpyp6GoVYNXEO0xWlYc9Q_oUNXKmKpGK2S4UwPp_V8lX9qTr8ZLXLk3DXnR8l9yJRiQ9Ggd_j9xw7X1y63O8Jn9AfkzpxvQXmDftPMXzVprT6byVriN-E7TGOK2V699RzN_pLmkokoPdlt33lJq2oYhtnC7GoPdhS5cLDxPYLt2V3oFu5Qa0hRcthd_axMjtdugpHvvSqSjLQDEc66xDbx3_B9-8Caksg6PnMNbN2XJrjVstzEPy7fjj1w-f0li7IQX2lEPKnKodJuF6wQ1z3BS8yIzivqm8KgqjGrAcEA0fuChsk_OGsUZaw21tuWoYf0T22q51TwgVpVDScu9zb4TJnVK5rFmlRFU2RV6ahGQTL7WNwOZYX2Opg4NTlXpkvwb2a2S_Fgl5s-uyHlE9_kb8HgVkR4iA3OEBiKmOYqr_JaYJeYHipcfs1p1a0UdYjgB8TsYT8jpQoGKB4VsT8yNgERCia0Z5MKMEhWBnzS8nEdbYhFF0resueo3BmhnocFkk5PEo0rtZgdknK3A-EyJnwj6b9rylXZwHPPJCKrArZULeTp-Fjoqw__Oq7v-PVX1KboMBi9GYKc8OyN6wuXDPyE17OSz6zfOgEn4CvbxpRA
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
Title Economic evaluation of type 2 diabetes prevention programmes: Markov model of low- and high-intensity lifestyle programmes and metformin in participants with different categories of intermediate hyperglycaemia
URI https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12916-017-0984-4
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29378576
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1993018375
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC5798197
https://doaj.org/article/753bd07bf6e84f17a6c60fb291696ff0
Volume 16
WOSCitedRecordID wos000423747000001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVADU
  databaseName: BioMedCentral
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1741-7015
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0025774
  issn: 1741-7015
  databaseCode: RBZ
  dateStart: 20030101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.biomedcentral.com/search/
  providerName: BioMedCentral
– providerCode: PRVAON
  databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1741-7015
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0025774
  issn: 1741-7015
  databaseCode: DOA
  dateStart: 20030101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.doaj.org/
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
– providerCode: PRVHPJ
  databaseName: ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1741-7015
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0025774
  issn: 1741-7015
  databaseCode: M~E
  dateStart: 20030101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://road.issn.org
  providerName: ISSN International Centre
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: Health & Medical Collection
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1741-7015
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0025774
  issn: 1741-7015
  databaseCode: 7X7
  dateStart: 20090101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/healthcomplete
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: ProQuest Central
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1741-7015
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0025774
  issn: 1741-7015
  databaseCode: BENPR
  dateStart: 20090101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.proquest.com/central
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: ProQuest Publicly Available Content Database
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1741-7015
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0025774
  issn: 1741-7015
  databaseCode: PIMPY
  dateStart: 20090101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: http://search.proquest.com/publiccontent
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVAVX
  databaseName: SpringerLINK Contemporary 1997-Present
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1741-7015
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0025774
  issn: 1741-7015
  databaseCode: RSV
  dateStart: 20031201
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://link.springer.com/search?facet-content-type=%22Journal%22
  providerName: Springer Nature
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1ba9swFBZrO8Zedr946zINBoMNU9uSLWtv7WjZHhpCd6F7ErIspYbEDrHbkZ-5fzQdRc7q7gIbmICjI9u6nYt0zncQehlrY5SiKkwIlyHlJLZ80FhFzpSE8CLissxdsgk2Huenp3zi47jb3tu9P5J0nNot6zzba61kisH6ZWHEcxrSLbRjpV0O-RpOPn7ZWFmpVWj88eVvqw0EkMPp_5UbXxJHV10lr5yXOjF0dPu_GnAH3fJaJ95fT5O76Jqu76Ebx_5c_T763scn45_o37gxGDZocYL7DVq88IBPttQ7ds11-xZDwE9zgV1WHag2a76FWNYlBjDksFp7yXcrPKuMbfZqpi_VdnRz3YHyXNXYXgvpXb3rrsWwT4z7LC4dBv-taQPmPbwHnrx0sS-dxmf2W5fT2UpJPa_kA_T56PDTu_ehT_YQKmtDdWGseaEhatdQImNNZErSSHJiytzwNJW8tKoGwOdnPKOqTEgZxyVTkqhCEV7G5CHarptaP0aYZpQzRYxJjKQy0ZwnrIhzTvOsTJNMBijqZ4BQHgkdEnLMhLOI8kysh0rYoRIwVIIG6PWmymINA_I34gOYVhtCQPB2fzTLqfAMQVgzsSgjVphM59TETGa2H0wBj-KZMVGAnsOkFOtw2A0fEvuQv8AaqTEJ0CtHAZzIfr6SPqDCdgJgeg0odweUloOoQfGLfuILKAK3u1o3560A787IMn2WBujReiFsWmX1RJZbazVAbLBEBs0eltTVmQMwTxm3iigL0Jt-oQjPOds_9-qTf6J-im5a1Rb8NEMS7aLtbnmun6Hr6qKr2uUIbbFT5n7zEdo5OBxPTkZuN8beTT4cT76OHE_5AU0Bcsw
linkProvider Springer Nature
linkToHtml http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwELagIMqFNyVQqJGQkEARSezEMbeCqIpoVwgK6s1yHHsbaTdZbdKi_Zn8IzyOszTlIYG0p3icje3xPOyZbxB6FmtjlKIqTAiXIeUktnLQWEPOlITwIuKyzF2xCTaZ5MfH_KPP426HaPfhStJJaret8-xVazVTDN4vCyOe05BeRleoVVgAmP_p89e1l5Vag8ZfX_6220gBOZz-X6XxOXV0MVTywn2pU0N7N_9rALfQDW914t2eTW6jS7q-g64d-nv1u-j7kJ-Mf6J_48ZgOKDFCR4OaPHCAz7ZVh_YNdftawwJP80ZdlV1oNus-RZiWZcYwJDDqo-S71Z4Vhk77NVMn-vt6Oa6A-O5qrH9LaQP9a67FsM5MR6quHQY4remDbj38D_w5qXLfek0PrHfupzOVkrqeSXvoS97747e7oe-2EOorA_VhbHmhYasXUOJjDWRKUkjyYkpc8PTVPLSmhoAn5_xjKoyIWUcl0xJogpFeBmT-2ijbmr9AGGaUc4UMSYxkspEc56wIs45zbMyTTIZoGjgAKE8EjoU5JgJ5xHlmeiXStilErBUggboxbrLoocB-RvxG2CrNSEgeLsHzXIqvEAQ1k0syogVJtM5NTGTmZ0HU8CreGZMFKAdYErRp8Ou5ZDYhfoF1kmNSYCeOwqQRPbzlfQJFXYSANNrRLk9orQSRI2anw6ML6AJwu5q3Zy2AqI7Iyv0WRqgrX4jrEdl7USWW281QGy0RUbDHrfU1YkDME8Zt4YoC9DLYaMILznbP8_qw3-i3kGb-0eHB-Lg_eTDI3TdmrkQsxmSaBttdMtT_RhdVWdd1S6fOOnxA5b6b6A
linkToPdf http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Zb9QwELagoIqXckOgUCMhIYGiJrETx7yVYwUCVpU41DfL8bGNtJusNmmr_Zn8IzyJszTlkBDSPsXjbHzMZc98g9DT2FirFFVhQrgMKSexk4PWGXJWE8KLiEudd8Um2HSaHx3xQ1_ntBmi3YcryT6nAVCaqnZ_qW3P4nm23zgtFYMnzMKI5zSkl9EVCnH04K5__rbxuFJn3PirzN92GymjDrP_V8l8TjVdDJu8cHfaqaTJ9f8ezA20461RfNBvn5vokqluoe1P_r79Nvo-5C3jn6jguLYYDm5xgoeDW7z0QFCu1Qd8LUzzEkMiUH2Ku2o70G1en4VYVhoDSHJY9tHz7RrPS-umYD0353p3dAvTglFdVtj9ltKHgFdtg-H8GA_VXVoMcV2zGtx--B9486rLiWkNPnbfuprN10qaRSnvoK-Tt19evwt9EYhQOd-qDWPDCwPZvJYSGRsiU5JGkhOrc8vTVHLtTBCA1c94RpVOiI5jzZQkqlCE65jcRVtVXZn7CNOMcqaItYmVVCaG84QVcc5pnuk0yWSAomE3COUR0qFQx1x0nlKeiX6phFsqAUslaICeb7ose3iQvxG_gi22IQRk7-5BvZoJLyiEcx8LHbHCZianNmYyc_NgC3gVz6yNArQHG1T0abIb-SQOoK6Bc15jEqBnHQVIKPf5SvpECzcJgPU1otwdUTrJokbNTwYmENAE4XiVqU8aAVGfkVMGLA3QvZ4pNqNy9iPLnRcbIDZil9Gwxy1VedwBm6eMOwOVBejFwDTCS9Tmz7P64J-o99D24ZuJ-Ph--uEhuuasXwjlDEm0i7ba1Yl5hK6q07ZsVo87QfIDHtd4hA
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Economic+evaluation+of+type+2+diabetes+prevention+programmes%3A+Markov+model+of+low-+and+high-intensity+lifestyle+programmes+and+metformin+in+participants+with+different+categories+of+intermediate+hyperglycaemia&rft.jtitle=BMC+medicine&rft.au=Roberts%2C+Samantha&rft.au=Craig%2C+Dawn&rft.au=Adler%2C+Amanda&rft.au=McPherson%2C+Klim&rft.date=2018-01-30&rft.pub=BioMed+Central&rft.eissn=1741-7015&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=1&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12916-017-0984-4&rft.externalDocID=10_1186_s12916_017_0984_4
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1741-7015&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1741-7015&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1741-7015&client=summon