Scale‐ and time‐dependent effects of fertilization, mowing and dominant removal on a grassland community during a 15‐year experiment
Multiple land‐use change drivers affect, in most cases negatively, the biodiversity in species‐rich meadows. Empirical data that can help to disentangle the effects of individual drivers and quantify the time required for a biodiversity response are seldom available. Management decisions are often b...
Uložené v:
| Vydané v: | The Journal of applied ecology Ročník 51; číslo 4; s. 978 - 987 |
|---|---|
| Hlavní autori: | , |
| Médium: | Journal Article |
| Jazyk: | English |
| Vydavateľské údaje: |
Oxford
Blackwell Scientific Publications
01.08.2014
John Wiley & Sons Ltd Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
| Predmet: | |
| ISSN: | 0021-8901, 1365-2664 |
| On-line prístup: | Získať plný text |
| Tagy: |
Pridať tag
Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!
|
| Abstract | Multiple land‐use change drivers affect, in most cases negatively, the biodiversity in species‐rich meadows. Empirical data that can help to disentangle the effects of individual drivers and quantify the time required for a biodiversity response are seldom available. Management decisions are often based on short‐term experiments or observational data. A 15‐year field experiment, comprising a factorial combination of fertilization, mowing and removal of the dominant species Molinia caerulea, was established in an oligotrophic wet meadow in Czech Republic. Each of the eight factorial combinations was replicated three times. Percentage cover for all species was monitored annually in 1‐m² plots and species' presence recorded in each cell of a continuous square grid of 25 cells (0·1 × 0·1 m each). These data enabled various scale‐dependent estimates of species richness. The species composition of individual treatment combinations diverged over time, particularly at the start of the experiment, and by the latter stages resembled various typical grassland communities from the surrounding landscape. Fertilization had the most pronounced effect, leading to a sharp decrease in species richness, most rapidly at the smallest spatial scale. Mowing had on average a positive effect on species richness and led in most cases to spatially homogeneous species composition. The removal of Molinia had a positive effect on species richness, especially in unmown unfertilized plots. The effects of each factor were dependent on the combination of the other two factors, and also on time, with some effects continuously increasing throughout and some diminishing by the end of the experiment. The process of competitive exclusion with fertilization and cessation of mowing was, in some treatment combinations, rather slow. Synthesis and applications. Land‐use change drivers act in combination, and their effects on the structure of species‐rich wet meadows are dependent on both the temporal and spatial scales considered. Short‐term experiments might underestimate the response of vegetation and thus provide erroneous conservation recommendations. Mowing was only effective in preventing species richness decline caused by fertilization in the short term. The presence of a single dominant species can modify the effectiveness of conservation measures. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Multiple land-use change drivers affect, in most cases negatively, the biodiversity in species-rich meadows. Empirical data that can help to disentangle the effects of individual drivers and quantify the time required for a biodiversity response are seldom available. Management decisions are often based on short-term experiments or observational data.A 15-year field experiment, comprising a factorial combination of fertilization, mowing and removal of the dominant species Molinia caerulea, was established in an oligotrophic wet meadow in Czech Republic. Each of the eight factorial combinations was replicated three times. Percentage cover for all species was monitored annually in 1-m2 plots and species' presence recorded in each cell of a continuous square grid of 25 cells (0.1 0.1 m each). These data enabled various scale-dependent estimates of species richness.The species composition of individual treatment combinations diverged over time, particularly at the start of the experiment, and by the latter stages resembled various typical grassland communities from the surrounding landscape. Fertilization had the most pronounced effect, leading to a sharp decrease in species richness, most rapidly at the smallest spatial scale. Mowing had on average a positive effect on species richness and led in most cases to spatially homogeneous species composition. The removal of Molinia had a positive effect on species richness, especially in unmown unfertilized plots.The effects of each factor were dependent on the combination of the other two factors, and also on time, with some effects continuously increasing throughout and some diminishing by the end of the experiment. The process of competitive exclusion with fertilization and cessation of mowing was, in some treatment combinations, rather slow.Synthesis and applications. Land-use change drivers act in combination, and their effects on the structure of species-rich wet meadows are dependent on both the temporal and spatial scales considered. Short-term experiments might underestimate the response of vegetation and thus provide erroneous conservation recommendations. Mowing was only effective in preventing species richness decline caused by fertilization in the short term. The presence of a single dominant species can modify the effectiveness of conservation measures. Land-use change drivers act in combination, and their effects on the structure of species-rich wet meadows are dependent on both the temporal and spatial scales considered. Short-term experiments might underestimate the response of vegetation and thus provide erroneous conservation recommendations. Mowing was only effective in preventing species richness decline caused by fertilization in the short term. The presence of a single dominant species can modify the effectiveness of conservation measures. Summary Multiple land‐use change drivers affect, in most cases negatively, the biodiversity in species‐rich meadows. Empirical data that can help to disentangle the effects of individual drivers and quantify the time required for a biodiversity response are seldom available. Management decisions are often based on short‐term experiments or observational data. A 15‐year field experiment, comprising a factorial combination of fertilization, mowing and removal of the dominant species Molinia caerulea, was established in an oligotrophic wet meadow in Czech Republic. Each of the eight factorial combinations was replicated three times. Percentage cover for all species was monitored annually in 1‐m2 plots and species' presence recorded in each cell of a continuous square grid of 25 cells (0·1 × 0·1 m each). These data enabled various scale‐dependent estimates of species richness. The species composition of individual treatment combinations diverged over time, particularly at the start of the experiment, and by the latter stages resembled various typical grassland communities from the surrounding landscape. Fertilization had the most pronounced effect, leading to a sharp decrease in species richness, most rapidly at the smallest spatial scale. Mowing had on average a positive effect on species richness and led in most cases to spatially homogeneous species composition. The removal of Molinia had a positive effect on species richness, especially in unmown unfertilized plots. The effects of each factor were dependent on the combination of the other two factors, and also on time, with some effects continuously increasing throughout and some diminishing by the end of the experiment. The process of competitive exclusion with fertilization and cessation of mowing was, in some treatment combinations, rather slow. Synthesis and applications. Land‐use change drivers act in combination, and their effects on the structure of species‐rich wet meadows are dependent on both the temporal and spatial scales considered. Short‐term experiments might underestimate the response of vegetation and thus provide erroneous conservation recommendations. Mowing was only effective in preventing species richness decline caused by fertilization in the short term. The presence of a single dominant species can modify the effectiveness of conservation measures. Land‐use change drivers act in combination, and their effects on the structure of species‐rich wet meadows are dependent on both the temporal and spatial scales considered. Short‐term experiments might underestimate the response of vegetation and thus provide erroneous conservation recommendations. Mowing was only effective in preventing species richness decline caused by fertilization in the short term. The presence of a single dominant species can modify the effectiveness of conservation measures. Multiple land-use change drivers affect, in most cases negatively, the biodiversity in species-rich meadows. Empirical data that can help to disentangle the effects of individual drivers and quantify the time required for a biodiversity response are seldom available. Management decisions are often based on short-term experiments or observational data. A 15-year field experiment, comprising a factorial combination of fertilization, mowing and removal of the dominant species Molinia caerulea, was established in an oligotrophic wet meadow in Czech Republic. Each of the eight factorial combinations was replicated three times. Percentage cover for all species was monitored annually in 1^sup -m2^ plots and species' presence recorded in each cell of a continuous square grid of 25 cells (0.1 x 0.1 m each). These data enabled various scale-dependent estimates of species richness. The species composition of individual treatment combinations diverged over time, particularly at the start of the experiment, and by the latter stages resembled various typical grassland communities from the surrounding landscape. Fertilization had the most pronounced effect, leading to a sharp decrease in species richness, most rapidly at the smallest spatial scale. Mowing had on average a positive effect on species richness and led in most cases to spatially homogeneous species composition. The removal of Molinia had a positive effect on species richness, especially in unmown unfertilized plots. The effects of each factor were dependent on the combination of the other two factors, and also on time, with some effects continuously increasing throughout and some diminishing by the end of the experiment. The process of competitive exclusion with fertilization and cessation of mowing was, in some treatment combinations, rather slow. 5. Land-use change drivers act in combination, and their effects on the structure of species-rich wet meadows are dependent on both the temporal and spatial scales considered. Short-term experiments might underestimate the response of vegetation and thus provide erroneous conservation recommendations. Mowing was only effective in preventing species richness decline caused by fertilization in the short term. The presence of a single dominant species can modify the effectiveness of conservation measures. 1. Multiple land-use change drivers affect, in most cases negatively, the biodiversity in species-rich meadows. Empirical data that can help to disentangle the effects of individual drivers and quantify the time required for a biodiversity response are seldom available. Management decisions are often based on short-term experiments or observational data. 2. A 15-year field experiment, comprising a factorial combination of fertilization, mowing and removal of the dominant species Molinia caerulea, was established in an oligotrophic wet meadow in Czech Republic. Each of the eight factorial combinations was replicated three times. Percentage cover for all species was monitored annually in 1-m² plots and species' presence recorded in each cell of a continuous square grid of 25 cells (0·1 × 0·1 m each). These data enabled various scale-dependent estimates of species richness. 3. The species composition of individual treatment combinations diverged over time, particularly at the start of the experiment, and by the latter stages resembled various typical grassland communities from the surrounding landscape. Fertilization had the most pronounced effect, leading to a sharp decrease in species richness, most rapidly at the smallest spatial scale. Mowing had on average a positive effect on species richness and led in most cases to spatially homogeneous species composition. The removal of Molinia had a positive effect on species richness, especially in unmown unfertilized plots. 4. The effects of each factor were dependent on the combination of the other two factors, and also on time, with some effects continuously increasing throughout and some diminishing by the end of the experiment. The process of competitive exclusion with fertilization and cessation of mowing was, in some treatment combinations, rather slow. 5. Synthesis and applications. Land-use change drivers act in combination, and their effects on the structure of species-rich wet meadows are dependent on both the temporal and spatial scales considered. Short-term experiments might underestimate the response of vegetation and thus provide erroneous conservation recommendations. Mowing was only effective in preventing species richness decline caused by fertilization in the short term. The presence of a single dominant species can modify the effectiveness of conservation measures. Multiple land‐use change drivers affect, in most cases negatively, the biodiversity in species‐rich meadows. Empirical data that can help to disentangle the effects of individual drivers and quantify the time required for a biodiversity response are seldom available. Management decisions are often based on short‐term experiments or observational data. A 15‐year field experiment, comprising a factorial combination of fertilization, mowing and removal of the dominant species Molinia caerulea, was established in an oligotrophic wet meadow in Czech Republic. Each of the eight factorial combinations was replicated three times. Percentage cover for all species was monitored annually in 1‐m²plots and species' presence recorded in each cell of a continuous square grid of 25 cells (0·1 × 0·1 m each). These data enabled various scale‐dependent estimates of species richness. The species composition of individual treatment combinations diverged over time, particularly at the start of the experiment, and by the latter stages resembled various typical grassland communities from the surrounding landscape. Fertilization had the most pronounced effect, leading to a sharp decrease in species richness, most rapidly at the smallest spatial scale. Mowing had on average a positive effect on species richness and led in most cases to spatially homogeneous species composition. The removal of Molinia had a positive effect on species richness, especially in unmown unfertilized plots. The effects of each factor were dependent on the combination of the other two factors, and also on time, with some effects continuously increasing throughout and some diminishing by the end of the experiment. The process of competitive exclusion with fertilization and cessation of mowing was, in some treatment combinations, rather slow. Synthesis and applications. Land‐use change drivers act in combination, and their effects on the structure of species‐rich wet meadows are dependent on both the temporal and spatial scales considered. Short‐term experiments might underestimate the response of vegetation and thus provide erroneous conservation recommendations. Mowing was only effective in preventing species richness decline caused by fertilization in the short term. The presence of a single dominant species can modify the effectiveness of conservation measures. Multiple land‐use change drivers affect, in most cases negatively, the biodiversity in species‐rich meadows. Empirical data that can help to disentangle the effects of individual drivers and quantify the time required for a biodiversity response are seldom available. Management decisions are often based on short‐term experiments or observational data. A 15‐year field experiment, comprising a factorial combination of fertilization, mowing and removal of the dominant species Molinia caerulea, was established in an oligotrophic wet meadow in Czech Republic. Each of the eight factorial combinations was replicated three times. Percentage cover for all species was monitored annually in 1‐m² plots and species' presence recorded in each cell of a continuous square grid of 25 cells (0·1 × 0·1 m each). These data enabled various scale‐dependent estimates of species richness. The species composition of individual treatment combinations diverged over time, particularly at the start of the experiment, and by the latter stages resembled various typical grassland communities from the surrounding landscape. Fertilization had the most pronounced effect, leading to a sharp decrease in species richness, most rapidly at the smallest spatial scale. Mowing had on average a positive effect on species richness and led in most cases to spatially homogeneous species composition. The removal of Molinia had a positive effect on species richness, especially in unmown unfertilized plots. The effects of each factor were dependent on the combination of the other two factors, and also on time, with some effects continuously increasing throughout and some diminishing by the end of the experiment. The process of competitive exclusion with fertilization and cessation of mowing was, in some treatment combinations, rather slow. Synthesis and applications. Land‐use change drivers act in combination, and their effects on the structure of species‐rich wet meadows are dependent on both the temporal and spatial scales considered. Short‐term experiments might underestimate the response of vegetation and thus provide erroneous conservation recommendations. Mowing was only effective in preventing species richness decline caused by fertilization in the short term. The presence of a single dominant species can modify the effectiveness of conservation measures. Multiple land‐use change drivers affect, in most cases negatively, the biodiversity in species‐rich meadows. Empirical data that can help to disentangle the effects of individual drivers and quantify the time required for a biodiversity response are seldom available. Management decisions are often based on short‐term experiments or observational data. A 15‐year field experiment, comprising a factorial combination of fertilization, mowing and removal of the dominant species M olinia caerulea , was established in an oligotrophic wet meadow in Czech Republic. Each of the eight factorial combinations was replicated three times. Percentage cover for all species was monitored annually in 1‐m 2 plots and species' presence recorded in each cell of a continuous square grid of 25 cells (0·1 × 0·1 m each). These data enabled various scale‐dependent estimates of species richness. The species composition of individual treatment combinations diverged over time, particularly at the start of the experiment, and by the latter stages resembled various typical grassland communities from the surrounding landscape. Fertilization had the most pronounced effect, leading to a sharp decrease in species richness, most rapidly at the smallest spatial scale. Mowing had on average a positive effect on species richness and led in most cases to spatially homogeneous species composition. The removal of M olinia had a positive effect on species richness, especially in unmown unfertilized plots. The effects of each factor were dependent on the combination of the other two factors, and also on time, with some effects continuously increasing throughout and some diminishing by the end of the experiment. The process of competitive exclusion with fertilization and cessation of mowing was, in some treatment combinations, rather slow. Synthesis and applications . Land‐use change drivers act in combination, and their effects on the structure of species‐rich wet meadows are dependent on both the temporal and spatial scales considered. Short‐term experiments might underestimate the response of vegetation and thus provide erroneous conservation recommendations. Mowing was only effective in preventing species richness decline caused by fertilization in the short term. The presence of a single dominant species can modify the effectiveness of conservation measures. Land‐use change drivers act in combination, and their effects on the structure of species‐rich wet meadows are dependent on both the temporal and spatial scales considered. Short‐term experiments might underestimate the response of vegetation and thus provide erroneous conservation recommendations. Mowing was only effective in preventing species richness decline caused by fertilization in the short term. The presence of a single dominant species can modify the effectiveness of conservation measures. |
| Author | Lepš, Jan Wan, Shiqiang |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 fullname: Lepš, Jan – sequence: 2 fullname: Wan, Shiqiang |
| BookMark | eNqFkTtvFDEUhUcoSGwCNRXCEg0Fk_g9domi8FIkkEJqy-uxV17N2IvtSVgqaqr8xvwSPLshRQpyG1u-3_G1zzlsDkIMtmleIniMap0gwlmLOafHCGPGnjSL-5ODZgEhRq2QED1rDnNeQwglI2TR_LkwerC3v2-ADj0ofpz3vd3Y0NtQgHXOmpJBdMDZVPzgf-niY3gHxnjtw2qn6uPog650smO80gOIAWiwSjrnYe6bOI5T8GUL-intRACxOmZrdQL258amOjaU581Tp4dsX9ytR83lh7Pvp5_a868fP5--P28Nh5S1SBLplsvOyU4703d91y0Ndcb1TFAppLPcGN0jQ-kSSi6WTBDBnaMQWsqwIEfN2_29mxR_TDYXNfps7FDfauOUFZK1sJAYPo4yRiVjhPOKvnmAruOUQv1IpajgiEjCKsX2lEkx52SdMr7sHC1J-0EhqOYw1RydmqNTuzCr7uSBblNN02n7H8XdpGs_2O1juPry7eyf7tVet84lpnsdppDgam_tv973nY5Kr5LP6vICQ1TtRUQw3JG_N6bILw |
| CODEN | JAPEAI |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agee_2020_106880 crossref_primary_10_1007_s42729_022_00932_7 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_baae_2022_06_010 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11104_022_05670_4 crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2745_12412 crossref_primary_10_1111_oik_10043 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvman_2022_115889 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rama_2024_09_003 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolind_2023_111430 crossref_primary_10_3390_d12010011 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biocon_2020_108422 crossref_primary_10_1111_jvs_13282 crossref_primary_10_3390_agriculture13112171 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gecco_2025_e03535 crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2745_13573 crossref_primary_10_3390_life12111785 crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2664_13129 crossref_primary_10_1002_oik_11076 crossref_primary_10_1111_jvs_12916 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2021_149482 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11258_023_01306_4 crossref_primary_10_1111_avsc_12250 crossref_primary_10_1111_grs_12252 crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2664_12889 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolind_2022_108971 crossref_primary_10_3390_plants10112252 crossref_primary_10_3390_plants11223042 crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2745_13007 crossref_primary_10_3897_ved_157888 crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2745_13246 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rama_2024_05_007 crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2745_12395 crossref_primary_10_1111_nph_15789 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0149270 crossref_primary_10_1111_jvs_12409 crossref_primary_10_1111_jvs_12926 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_flora_2020_151665 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11104_020_04631_z crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agee_2024_109048 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvman_2024_120216 crossref_primary_10_1111_gfs_12512 crossref_primary_10_1007_s42832_020_0048_0 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolind_2022_109672 crossref_primary_10_1111_avsc_12665 crossref_primary_10_3897_neobiota_94_122337 crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2745_13753 crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2745_13476 crossref_primary_10_1002_ecy_2065 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolind_2024_111719 crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2435_13792 crossref_primary_10_1002_oik_11211 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pld_2024_04_005 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agee_2024_109313 crossref_primary_10_1111_avsc_12579 crossref_primary_10_1111_avsc_12339 crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2435_13287 crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2664_12349 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpls_2022_815011 crossref_primary_10_1002_ece3_7306 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecoleng_2020_105727 crossref_primary_10_1111_jbi_14747 crossref_primary_10_1002_ecs2_4393 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpls_2021_704511 crossref_primary_10_1111_ele_13838 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agee_2023_108358 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envexpbot_2021_104372 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agee_2016_02_008 crossref_primary_10_3390_land10111158 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_actao_2022_103871 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13717_024_00544_2 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heliyon_2024_e27810 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_flora_2023_152273 crossref_primary_10_1111_icad_12828 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agee_2016_03_044 crossref_primary_10_1080_15592324_2024_2335025 crossref_primary_10_1002_ecy_70164 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11258_019_00985_2 crossref_primary_10_1002_ece3_70923 crossref_primary_10_3390_land12010149 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_actao_2017_10_011 crossref_primary_10_1111_oik_07379 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11258_024_01467_w crossref_primary_10_1007_s10531_022_02463_0 crossref_primary_10_3390_plants12051162 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00442_019_04353_9 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpls_2022_993051 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_actao_2023_103957 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00442_024_05555_6 crossref_primary_10_1002_ecs2_3547 crossref_primary_10_1111_avsc_12223 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00442_016_3548_y crossref_primary_10_1111_avsc_12743 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11427_022_2217_9 crossref_primary_10_1002_eap_70009 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10021_016_0031_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_actao_2020_103692 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0197363 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvman_2025_124120 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jia_2025_09_010 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_catena_2018_09_034 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11104_022_05485_3 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10531_020_01976_w crossref_primary_10_1080_17550874_2022_2130718 crossref_primary_10_1088_1748_9326_ab8a87 crossref_primary_10_1080_17550874_2022_2039314 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01496.x 10.1046/j.1365-2745.2001.00662.x 10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00007-7 10.1016/j.actao.2005.03.006 10.2307/3544968 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00841.x 10.2307/3546297 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2010.01226.x 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2006.01145.x 10.2307/2656635 10.1111/j.0021-8901.2004.00901.x 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2010.06904.x 10.3170/2008-7-18354 10.1126/science.1169640 10.1007/s11258-012-0123-4 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01801.x 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2007.tb02512.x 10.1007/s00442-011-2142-6 10.2307/3236049 10.2307/3237143 10.1034/j.1600-0587.2001.240206.x 10.1007/s10531-008-9424-2 10.2307/3235829 10.1017/CBO9781139627061 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.13023.x 10.1556/ComEc.9.2008.1.3 10.1016/j.agee.2006.12.036 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01102.x 10.1007/BF00031697 10.1002/etc.5620180207 10.1007/BF02883148 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2012.02020.x |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | 2014 British Ecological Society 2014 The Author. Journal of Applied Ecology © 2014 British Ecological Society Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Aug 2014 |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: 2014 British Ecological Society – notice: 2014 The Author. Journal of Applied Ecology © 2014 British Ecological Society – notice: Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Aug 2014 |
| DBID | FBQ AAYXX CITATION 7SN 7SS 7T7 7U7 8FD C1K FR3 M7N P64 RC3 7ST 7U6 7S9 L.6 |
| DOI | 10.1111/1365-2664.12255 |
| DatabaseName | AGRIS CrossRef Ecology Abstracts Entomology Abstracts (Full archive) Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A) Toxicology Abstracts Technology Research Database Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management Engineering Research Database Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C) Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Genetics Abstracts Environment Abstracts Sustainability Science Abstracts AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef Entomology Abstracts Genetics Abstracts Technology Research Database Toxicology Abstracts Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C) Engineering Research Database Ecology Abstracts Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A) Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management Environment Abstracts Sustainability Science Abstracts AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | Ecology Abstracts Entomology Abstracts AGRICOLA CrossRef |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Agriculture Biology Ecology |
| EISSN | 1365-2664 |
| EndPage | 987 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 3385465841 10_1111_1365_2664_12255 JPE12255 24032498 US201400138527 |
| Genre | article Feature |
| GeographicLocations | Czech Republic Czech Rep |
| GeographicLocations_xml | – name: Czech Republic – name: Czech Rep |
| GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: Grant Agency of the Czech Republic funderid: 13‐17118S |
| GroupedDBID | -~X .3N .GA .Y3 05W 0R~ 10A 1OC 24P 29J 2AX 2WC 31~ 33P 3SF 4.4 42X 50Y 50Z 51W 51X 52M 52N 52O 52P 52S 52T 52U 52W 52X 53G 5GY 5HH 5LA 5VS 66C 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8UM 930 A03 AAESR AAEVG AAHHS AAHKG AAISJ AAKGQ AANLZ AAONW AASGY AAXRX AAYJJ AAZKR ABBHK ABCQN ABCUV ABEFU ABEML ABHUG ABJNI ABPLY ABPPZ ABPTK ABPVW ABTAH ABTLG ABWRO ACAHQ ACCFJ ACCZN ACFBH ACGFS ACNCT ACPOU ACPRK ACSCC ACSTJ ACXBN ACXME ACXQS ADAWD ADBBV ADDAD ADEOM ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADOZA ADULT ADXAS ADZLD ADZMN ADZOD AEEZP AEIGN AEIMD AENEX AEQDE AESBF AEUPB AEUQT AEUYR AFAZZ AFBPY AFEBI AFFPM AFGKR AFPWT AFRAH AFVGU AFZJQ AGJLS AGUYK AI. AIRJO AIURR AIWBW AJBDE AJXKR ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN AMBMR AMYDB ANHSF AS~ ATUGU AUFTA AZBYB AZVAB BAFTC BFHJK BHBCM BMNLL BMXJE BNHUX BROTX BRXPI BY8 CAG CBGCD COF CS3 CUYZI CWIXF D-E D-F DCZOG DEVKO DOOOF DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DRSTM DU5 DWIUU E3Z EBS ECGQY EJD EQZMY ESX F00 F01 F04 F5P FBQ G-S G.N GODZA GTFYD H.T H.X HF~ HGD HQ2 HTVGU HZI HZ~ IHE IX1 J0M JAAYA JBMMH JBS JEB JENOY JHFFW JKQEH JLS JLXEF JPM JSODD JST K48 LATKE LC2 LC3 LEEKS LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LUTES LW6 LYRES MEWTI MK4 MRFUL MRSTM MSFUL MSSTM MXFUL MXSTM N04 N05 N9A NF~ O66 O9- OK1 P2P P2W P2X P4D PQQKQ Q.N Q11 QB0 R.K ROL RX1 SA0 SUPJJ UB1 VH1 VOH W8V W99 WBKPD WH7 WHG WIH WIK WIN WNSPC WOHZO WQJ WRC WXSBR WYISQ XG1 XIH YQT YYP ZY4 ZZTAW ~02 ~IA ~KM ~WT AAHBH AAHQN AAMMB AAMNL AAYCA ABSQW ABXSQ ACHIC ADMHG AEFGJ AEYWJ AFWVQ AGXDD AGYGG AHBTC AHXOZ AIDQK AIDYY AILXY AITYG ALVPJ AQVQM HGLYW IPSME OIG AAYXX AGHNM CITATION O8X 7SN 7SS 7T7 7U7 8FD C1K FR3 M7N P64 RC3 7ST 7U6 7S9 L.6 |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c6045-1939fbb7f97afcd7d77bc4fcfd584989fe6ccad1c44b0968b58386ff400e45283 |
| IEDL.DBID | DRFUL |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 133 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000342851000016&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 0021-8901 |
| IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 18:28:06 EDT 2025 Tue Oct 07 09:50:44 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 10:52:24 EDT 2025 Tue Nov 18 21:47:11 EST 2025 Sat Nov 29 04:14:24 EST 2025 Wed Jan 22 16:31:38 EST 2025 Thu Jul 03 22:43:54 EDT 2025 Wed Dec 27 19:02:44 EST 2023 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 4 |
| Language | English |
| License | http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c6045-1939fbb7f97afcd7d77bc4fcfd584989fe6ccad1c44b0968b58386ff400e45283 |
| Notes | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12255 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
| OpenAccessLink | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/1365-2664.12255 |
| PQID | 1548613935 |
| PQPubID | 37791 |
| PageCount | 10 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1999928920 proquest_miscellaneous_1554955366 proquest_journals_1548613935 crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_1365_2664_12255 crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2664_12255 wiley_primary_10_1111_1365_2664_12255_JPE12255 jstor_primary_24032498 fao_agris_US201400138527 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | August 2014 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2014-08-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 08 year: 2014 text: August 2014 |
| PublicationDecade | 2010 |
| PublicationPlace | Oxford |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Oxford |
| PublicationTitle | The Journal of applied ecology |
| PublicationYear | 2014 |
| Publisher | Blackwell Scientific Publications John Wiley & Sons Ltd Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Blackwell Scientific Publications – name: John Wiley & Sons Ltd – name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
| References | 2007; 18 2004; 41 1989; 83 2012; 100 2006; 94 2010; 13 2012; 168 2012 1997; 87 2000; 87 2007; 122 2006; 9 2008; 17 2008; 9 2011; 99 2003; 18 2011; 34 2008; 11 1994; 29 2001; 24 2005; 28 2004; 107 1990; 1 2006; 43 1999; 18 2011; 22 2005; 10 1999; 10 2002; 90 2014 2012; 213 2009; 324 1992; 3 1992; 63 e_1_2_6_10_1 e_1_2_6_31_1 e_1_2_6_30_1 e_1_2_6_19_1 e_1_2_6_13_1 e_1_2_6_35_1 e_1_2_6_11_1 e_1_2_6_34_1 e_1_2_6_12_1 e_1_2_6_33_1 e_1_2_6_17_1 e_1_2_6_18_1 e_1_2_6_15_1 e_1_2_6_16_1 e_1_2_6_21_1 e_1_2_6_20_1 ter Braak C.J.F. (e_1_2_6_32_1) 2012 e_1_2_6_9_1 e_1_2_6_8_1 e_1_2_6_5_1 e_1_2_6_4_1 e_1_2_6_7_1 e_1_2_6_6_1 e_1_2_6_25_1 e_1_2_6_24_1 e_1_2_6_3_1 e_1_2_6_23_1 e_1_2_6_2_1 e_1_2_6_22_1 Isselstein J. (e_1_2_6_14_1) 2005; 10 e_1_2_6_29_1 e_1_2_6_28_1 e_1_2_6_27_1 e_1_2_6_26_1 |
| References_xml | – volume: 18 start-page: 25 year: 2007 end-page: 34 article-title: Grazing effects on the species‐area relationship: variation along a climatic gradient in NE Spain publication-title: Journal of Vegetation Science – volume: 122 start-page: 259 year: 2007 end-page: 266 article-title: The Rengen Grassland Experiment: plant species composition after 64 years of fertilizer application publication-title: Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment – volume: 24 start-page: 157 year: 2001 end-page: 164 article-title: Structure and diversity of a species‐rich grassland community, treated with additional illumination, fertilization and mowing publication-title: Ecography – volume: 83 start-page: 249 year: 1989 end-page: 257 article-title: Species‐area curve, life history strategies, and succession: a field test of relationships publication-title: Vegetatio – volume: 3 start-page: 625 year: 1992 end-page: 630 article-title: Influence of colonizing shrubs on species‐area relationships in alvar plant communities publication-title: Journal of Vegetation Science – year: 2014 – volume: 17 start-page: 3241 year: 2008 end-page: 3253 article-title: Changes of species richness pattern in mountain grasslands: abandonment versus restoration publication-title: Biodiversity and Conservation – volume: 99 start-page: 788 year: 2011 end-page: 796 article-title: Niche overlap reveals the effects of competition, disturbance and contrasting assembly processes in experimental grassland communities publication-title: Journal of Ecology – volume: 94 start-page: 801 year: 2006 end-page: 814 article-title: The Park Grass Experiment 1856–2006: its contribution to ecology publication-title: Journal of Ecology – volume: 63 start-page: 420 year: 1992 end-page: 429 article-title: Plant responses to fertilization and species removal in tundra related to community structure and clonality publication-title: Oikos – volume: 100 start-page: 1391 year: 2012 end-page: 1399 article-title: Direct and productivity‐mediated indirect effects of fertilization, mowing and grazing on grassland species richness publication-title: Journal of Ecology – volume: 90 start-page: 316 year: 2002 end-page: 324 article-title: Why does fertilization reduce plant species diversity? Testing three competition‐based hypotheses publication-title: Journal of Ecology – volume: 1 start-page: 13 year: 1990 end-page: 30 article-title: Neighbor manipulations in natural vegetation – a review publication-title: Journal of Vegetation Science – volume: 10 start-page: 211 year: 2005 end-page: 220 article-title: Agronomic aspects of extensive grassland farming and biodiversity management publication-title: Grassland Science in Europe – volume: 213 start-page: 1675 year: 2012 end-page: 1686 article-title: Plant diversity in wet meadows: effects of environmental factors, evenness, and clonal growth as indicated by two models of species‐area relationship publication-title: Plant Ecology – volume: 43 start-page: 43 year: 2006 end-page: 50 article-title: Assessing the impact of on riparian habitats: partitioning diversity components following species removal publication-title: Journal of Applied Ecology – volume: 9 start-page: 17 year: 2008 end-page: 27 article-title: Positive relationship between plant palatability and litter decomposition in meadow plants publication-title: Community Ecology – volume: 87 start-page: 392 year: 2000 end-page: 401 article-title: The response of arbuscular mycorrhizae to fertilization mowing and removal of dominant in a diverse oligotrophic wet meadow publication-title: American Journal of Botany – volume: 87 start-page: 299 year: 1997 end-page: 310 article-title: Fine‐scale species interactions of clonal plants in a mountain grassland: a removal experiment publication-title: Oikos – volume: 18 start-page: 140 year: 2003 end-page: 146 article-title: Functional diversity revealed by removal experiments publication-title: Trends in Ecology & Evolution – volume: 9 start-page: 72 year: 2006 end-page: 77 article-title: Slow response of plant species richness to habitat loss and fragmentation publication-title: Ecology Letters – volume: 34 start-page: 856 year: 2011 end-page: 863 article-title: Community trait response to environment: disentangling species turnover vs intraspecific trait variability effects publication-title: Ecography – volume: 22 start-page: 184 year: 2011 end-page: 195 article-title: The twelve theories of co‐existence in plant communities: the doubtful, the important and the unexplored publication-title: Journal of Vegetation Science – volume: 107 start-page: 64 year: 2004 end-page: 71 article-title: Variability in population and community biomass in a grassland community affected by environmental productivity and diversity publication-title: Oikos – volume: 11 start-page: 187 year: 2008 end-page: 192 article-title: The effect of the expansion of the clonal grass on the species turnover of a semi‐arid grassland publication-title: Applied Vegetation Science – volume: 10 start-page: 219 year: 1999 end-page: 230 article-title: Nutrient status disturbance and competition: an experimental test of relationships in a wet meadow publication-title: Journal of Vegetation Science – volume: 28 start-page: 141 year: 2005 end-page: 147 article-title: Effect of litter, leaf cover and cover of basal internodes of the dominant species on seedling recruitment and established vegetation publication-title: Acta Oecologica – volume: 13 start-page: 1019 year: 2010 end-page: 1029 article-title: Coexistence of perennial plants: an embarrassment of niches publication-title: Ecology Letters – volume: 324 start-page: 636 year: 2009 end-page: 638 article-title: Competition for light causes plant biodiversity loss after eutrophication publication-title: Science – volume: 29 start-page: 511 year: 1994 end-page: 530 article-title: Variation in species richness: towards a unification of hypotheses publication-title: Folia Geobotanica et Phytotaxonomica – volume: 41 start-page: 398 year: 2004 end-page: 411 article-title: Control of on upland moors publication-title: Journal of Applied Ecology – volume: 168 start-page: 773 year: 2012 end-page: 783 article-title: Linking landscape history and dispersal traits in grassland plant communities publication-title: Oecologia – year: 2012 publication-title: Canoco Reference Manual and User's Guide: Software for Ordination (version 5.0) – volume: 18 start-page: 138 year: 1999 end-page: 148 article-title: Principal response curves: analysis of time‐dependent multivariate responses of a biological community to stress publication-title: Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry – ident: e_1_2_6_3_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01496.x – ident: e_1_2_6_26_1 doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2745.2001.00662.x – ident: e_1_2_6_5_1 doi: 10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00007-7 – ident: e_1_2_6_15_1 doi: 10.1016/j.actao.2005.03.006 – ident: e_1_2_6_16_1 doi: 10.2307/3544968 – ident: e_1_2_6_10_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00841.x – ident: e_1_2_6_11_1 doi: 10.2307/3546297 – ident: e_1_2_6_35_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2010.01226.x – ident: e_1_2_6_28_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2006.01145.x – ident: e_1_2_6_33_1 doi: 10.2307/2656635 – ident: e_1_2_6_21_1 doi: 10.1111/j.0021-8901.2004.00901.x – ident: e_1_2_6_20_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2010.06904.x – ident: e_1_2_6_31_1 doi: 10.3170/2008-7-18354 – ident: e_1_2_6_8_1 doi: 10.1126/science.1169640 – ident: e_1_2_6_12_1 doi: 10.1007/s11258-012-0123-4 – ident: e_1_2_6_22_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01801.x – ident: e_1_2_6_4_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2007.tb02512.x – ident: e_1_2_6_25_1 doi: 10.1007/s00442-011-2142-6 – ident: e_1_2_6_2_1 doi: 10.2307/3236049 – ident: e_1_2_6_17_1 doi: 10.2307/3237143 – ident: e_1_2_6_6_1 doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0587.2001.240206.x – ident: e_1_2_6_7_1 doi: 10.1007/s10531-008-9424-2 – ident: e_1_2_6_27_1 doi: 10.2307/3235829 – ident: e_1_2_6_29_1 doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139627061 – volume: 10 start-page: 211 year: 2005 ident: e_1_2_6_14_1 article-title: Agronomic aspects of extensive grassland farming and biodiversity management publication-title: Grassland Science in Europe – ident: e_1_2_6_18_1 doi: 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.13023.x – ident: e_1_2_6_23_1 doi: 10.1556/ComEc.9.2008.1.3 – ident: e_1_2_6_9_1 doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2006.12.036 – ident: e_1_2_6_13_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01102.x – ident: e_1_2_6_19_1 doi: 10.1007/BF00031697 – ident: e_1_2_6_34_1 doi: 10.1002/etc.5620180207 – ident: e_1_2_6_24_1 doi: 10.1007/BF02883148 – year: 2012 ident: e_1_2_6_32_1 publication-title: Canoco Reference Manual and User's Guide: Software for Ordination (version 5.0) – ident: e_1_2_6_30_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2012.02020.x |
| SSID | ssj0009533 |
| Score | 2.486901 |
| Snippet | Multiple land‐use change drivers affect, in most cases negatively, the biodiversity in species‐rich meadows. Empirical data that can help to disentangle the... 1. Multiple land-use change drivers affect, in most cases negatively, the biodiversity in species-rich meadows. Empirical data that can help to disentangle the... Summary Multiple land‐use change drivers affect, in most cases negatively, the biodiversity in species‐rich meadows. Empirical data that can help to... Multiple land-use change drivers affect, in most cases negatively, the biodiversity in species-rich meadows. Empirical data that can help to disentangle the... |
| SourceID | proquest crossref wiley jstor fao |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Enrichment Source Index Database Publisher |
| StartPage | 978 |
| SubjectTerms | Applied ecology Biodiversity Biodiversity and ecosystem function biodiversity decline competitive exclusion Conservation Czech Republic Dominant species Ecology Fertilization field experimentation Flowers & plants Grasses Grasslands Land use landscapes Meadows Molinia Molinia caerulea Mowing Ordination Plants principal response curves response time semi‐natural grassland Species composition Species diversity Species richness species–area relationship Synecology Vegetation |
| Title | Scale‐ and time‐dependent effects of fertilization, mowing and dominant removal on a grassland community during a 15‐year experiment |
| URI | https://www.jstor.org/stable/24032498 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2F1365-2664.12255 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1548613935 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1554955366 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1999928920 |
| Volume | 51 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos000342851000016&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVWIB databaseName: Wiley Online Library Free Content customDbUrl: eissn: 1365-2664 dateEnd: 20231206 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0009533 issn: 0021-8901 databaseCode: WIN dateStart: 19980101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com providerName: Wiley-Blackwell – providerCode: PRVWIB databaseName: Wiley Online Library Full Collection 2020 customDbUrl: eissn: 1365-2664 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0009533 issn: 0021-8901 databaseCode: DRFUL dateStart: 19980101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com providerName: Wiley-Blackwell |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwEB6xW5DogUeh6kKpjMSBA6l2EzuOj1XpClC1qigreoviV4XUJii7bbW3njnxG_klnUmcZYsECIlbJD8S2zP2N_E3MwCvEjFMtLIovPRzgxvJI53ZNJLOjbQ3mVFJ4yh8KCeT7OREHQU2IfnCtPEhlj_cSDOa_ZoUvNCzFSUP_KyU745QJkUP1mKUXtGHtbcfx9PDlci7bT554iJkePqF-D5E5_mli1tHU88XVcdRvIU-VzFscwiNH_6Hz38EDwICZXutyDyGO67cgPW90zpE4XAbcK_NULl4At-OcQ3dj-vvrCgto0T0-Nwlzp2zwAZhlWeeCNpnwavzDTuvrvBQbFrZqqXbsNqdVyjYrCpZwU5rhO1Eq2Sm9VGZL1jrM4mFI4GvWaASsp8ZCJ7CdHzwaf9dFNI3RCZFoBghNFRea-mVLLyx0kqpDffGWwQ9KlPepSg-dmQ412hIZZpucFPvcVdxnGLObEK_rEq3BUw6I3waD20iPccyrVyBSNOLAgGK8XwAu93K5SbENqcUG2d5Z-PQdOc03Xkz3QN4vWzwtQ3r8fuqWygKeYHLMMunxzGZpHS9K2I5gM1GPpZdUHBDtGezAWx3ApOHPWGWk3GI4Ekl2OXLZTFqM13RFKWrLqgO2utCJGn6hzqI6RXayfEQh92I2N-GkH84Omgenv1rg-dwnwbcMh63oT-vL9wLuGsu519m9U5QtR3ofX4_uQGmhyfh |
| linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
| linkToHtml | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1LbxMxEB7RAioceJRWTSlgJA4c2CrJetfrY4VatRAipLaiN2vXjwqp3a02aVFunDnxG_klnbG9IUUChMRtJT8S29_Y39jzAHiVZv20kgbBS5cbXAueVIXJE2HtoHK60DL1jsIjMR4XJydy0RcmxIeYX7iRZPj9mgScLqQXpDwaaOV8e4CgzJbgNke6QekbPh2MFwLvhnTyZIpQ4OEXw_uQNc8vHdw4mZZc2XQmijfI5yKF9WfQ3sP_8e8fwYPIQNlOgMxjuGXrVbi_c9rGKBx2Fe6GDJWzJ_DtENfQ_vj6nZW1YZSIHr-7xLlTFq1BWOOYIwPts-jV-YadN1_wUPStTBPMbVhrzxsENmtqVrLTFmk7mVUyHXxUpjMWfCaxcJDhz8xQCNnPDARrcLy3e_R2P4npGxKdI1FMkBpKV1XCSVE6bYQRotLcaWeQ9MhCOpsjfMxAc16hIlVU9IKbO4e7iuUUc2YdluumthvAhNWZy4d9kwrHsayStkSm6bISCYp2vAfb3dIpHWObU4qNM9XpODTdiqZb-enuwet5g4sQ1uP3VTcQC6rEZZio48MhqaT0vJsNRQ_WPUDmXVBwQ9Rnix5sdYhRcU-YKFIOkTzJFLt8OS9GaaYnmrK2zSXVQX09y9I8_0Md5PQS9eRhH4ftMfa3Iah3H3f9x-a_NngBK_tHH0ZqdDB-_xTu0eCD9eMWLE_bS_sM7uir6edJ-9xL3TWncymU |
| linkToPdf | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwEB7RLaBy4NFSddsCRuLAgVS7GyeOjxXtisdqVVFW6s2KXxVSm1TZLdXeOHPiN_JLOpM42y0SICRukfxIbM_Y38TfzAC8ipNerKVF4aWfG9wIHunMppFwrq-9yYyMa0fhkRiPs5MTuewL08SHWPxwI82o92tScHdh_ZKWB4JWyvf6KJTJCqxySiXTgdWDT8PJaCn0bpNQnsgIGR5_IcAP8Xl-6eLW2bTi87IlKd6Cn8sgtj6Fho_-x_c_hocBg7L9RmiewB1XrMOD_dMqxOFw63CvyVE534Dvx7iK7ue3HywvLKNU9Pjcps6dscAHYaVnnijaZ8Gv8w07L6_wWKxb2bIh3LDKnZco2qwsWM5OKwTuRKxkpvFSmc1Z4zWJhf0EXzNHNWQ3OQiewmR4-PntuygkcIhMilAxQnAovdbCS5F7Y4UVQhvujbcIe2QmvUtRgGzfcK7RlMo03eGm3uO-4jhFndmETlEWbguYcCbx6aBnY-E5lmnpcsSaPskRohjPu7DXLp0yIbo5Jdk4U62VQ9OtaLpVPd1deL1ocNEE9vh91S2UBZXjMkzV5HhARild8CYD0YXNWkAWXVB4Q7Rosy7sthKjwq4wVWQeInySMXb5clGM-kyXNHnhykuqgxZ7ksRp-oc6iOolWsqDHg67lrG_DUF9ODqsH7b_tcELuH90MFSj9-OPO7BGY2_oj7vQmVWX7hncNV9nX6bV86B2162nKj0 |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Scale-+and+time-dependent+effects+of+fertilization%2C+mowing+and+dominant+removal+on+a+grassland+community+during+a+15-year+experiment&rft.jtitle=The+Journal+of+applied+ecology&rft.au=Leps%2C+Jan&rft.date=2014-08-01&rft.pub=Blackwell+Publishing+Ltd&rft.issn=0021-8901&rft.eissn=1365-2664&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=978&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2F1365-2664.12255&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT&rft.externalDocID=3385465841 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0021-8901&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0021-8901&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0021-8901&client=summon |