Mediation analysis with a time-to-event outcome: a review of use and reporting in healthcare research

Background Mediation analysis tests whether the relationship between two variables is explained by a third intermediate variable. We sought to describe the usage and reporting of mediation analysis with time-to-event outcomes in published healthcare research. Methods A systematic search of Medline,...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:BMC medical research methodology Ročník 18; číslo 1; s. 118 - 12
Hlavní autoři: Lapointe-Shaw, Lauren, Bouck, Zachary, Howell, Nicholas A., Lange, Theis, Orchanian-Cheff, Ani, Austin, Peter C., Ivers, Noah M., Redelmeier, Donald A., Bell, Chaim M.
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: London BioMed Central 29.10.2018
BioMed Central Ltd
Springer Nature B.V
BMC
Témata:
ISSN:1471-2288, 1471-2288
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:Background Mediation analysis tests whether the relationship between two variables is explained by a third intermediate variable. We sought to describe the usage and reporting of mediation analysis with time-to-event outcomes in published healthcare research. Methods A systematic search of Medline, Embase, and Web of Science was executed in December 2016 to identify applications of mediation analysis to healthcare research involving a clinically relevant time-to-event outcome. We summarized usage over time and reporting of important methodological characteristics. Results We included 149 primary studies, published from 1997 to 2016. Most studies were published after 2011 ( n  = 110, 74%), and the annual number of studies nearly doubled in the last year (from n  = 21 to n  = 40). A traditional approach (causal steps or change in coefficient) was most commonly taken ( n  = 87, 58%), and the majority of studies ( n  = 114, 77%) used a Cox Proportional Hazards regression for the outcome. Few studies ( n  = 52, 35%) mentioned any of the assumptions or limitations fundamental to a causal interpretation of mediation analysis. Conclusion There is increasing use of mediation analysis with time-to-event outcomes. Current usage is limited by reliance on traditional methods and the Cox Proportional Hazards model, as well as low rates of reporting of underlying assumptions. There is a need for formal criteria to aid authors, reviewers, and readers reporting or appraising such studies.
Bibliografie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:1471-2288
1471-2288
DOI:10.1186/s12874-018-0578-7