Multimodality imaging with CT, MR and FDG-PET for radiotherapy target volume delineation in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma

Background This study aimed to quantify the variation in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma gross tumour volume (GTV) delineation between CT, MR and FDG PET-CT imaging. Methods A prospective, single centre, pilot study was undertaken where 11 patients with locally advanced oropharyngeal cancers (...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:BMC cancer Ročník 15; číslo 1; s. 844
Hlavní autoři: Bird, David, Scarsbrook, Andrew F., Sykes, Jonathan, Ramasamy, Satiavani, Subesinghe, Manil, Carey, Brendan, Wilson, Daniel J., Roberts, Neil, McDermott, Gary, Karakaya, Ebru, Bayman, Evrim, Sen, Mehmet, Speight, Richard, Prestwich, Robin J.D.
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: London BioMed Central 04.11.2015
BioMed Central Ltd
Springer Nature B.V
Témata:
ISSN:1471-2407, 1471-2407
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Abstract Background This study aimed to quantify the variation in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma gross tumour volume (GTV) delineation between CT, MR and FDG PET-CT imaging. Methods A prospective, single centre, pilot study was undertaken where 11 patients with locally advanced oropharyngeal cancers (2 tonsil, 9 base of tongue primaries) underwent pre-treatment, contrast enhanced, FDG PET-CT and MR imaging, all performed in a radiotherapy treatment mask. CT, MR and CT-MR GTVs were contoured by 5 clinicians (2 radiologists and 3 radiation oncologists). A semi-automated segmentation algorithm was used to contour PET GTVs. Volume and positional analyses were undertaken, accounting for inter-observer variation, using linear mixed effects models and contour comparison metrics respectively. Results Significant differences in mean GTV volume were found between CT (11.9 cm 3 ) and CT-MR (14.1 cm 3 ), p  < 0.006, CT-MR and PET (9.5 cm 3 ), p  < 0.0009, and MR (12.7 cm 3 ) and PET, p  < 0.016. Substantial differences in GTV position were found between all modalities with the exception of CT-MR and MR GTVs. A mean of 64 %, 74 % and 77 % of the PET GTVs were included within the CT, MR and CT-MR GTVs respectively. A mean of 57 % of the MR GTVs were included within the CT GTV; conversely a mean of 63 % of the CT GTVs were included within the MR GTV. CT inter-observer variability was found to be significantly higher in terms of position and/or volume than both MR and CT-MR ( p  < 0.05). Significant differences in GTV volume were found between GTV volumes delineated by radiologists (9.7 cm 3 ) and oncologists (14.6 cm 3 ) for all modalities ( p  = 0.001). Conclusions The use of different imaging modalities produced significantly different GTVs, with no single imaging technique encompassing all potential GTV regions. The use of MR reduced inter-observer variability. These data suggest delineation based on multimodality imaging has the potential to improve accuracy of GTV definition. Trial registration ISRCTN Registry: ISRCTN34165059 . Registered 2nd February 2015.
AbstractList This study aimed to quantify the variation in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma gross tumour volume (GTV) delineation between CT, MR and FDG PET-CT imaging. A prospective, single centre, pilot study was undertaken where 11 patients with locally advanced oropharyngeal cancers (2 tonsil, 9 base of tongue primaries) underwent pre-treatment, contrast enhanced, FDG PET-CT and MR imaging, all performed in a radiotherapy treatment mask. CT, MR and CT-MR GTVs were contoured by 5 clinicians (2 radiologists and 3 radiation oncologists). A semi-automated segmentation algorithm was used to contour PET GTVs. Volume and positional analyses were undertaken, accounting for inter-observer variation, using linear mixed effects models and contour comparison metrics respectively. Significant differences in mean GTV volume were found between CT (11.9 cm.sup.3) and CT-MR (14.1 cm.sup.3), p < 0.006, CT-MR and PET (9.5 cm.sup.3), p < 0.0009, and MR (12.7 cm.sup.3) and PET, p < 0.016. Substantial differences in GTV position were found between all modalities with the exception of CT-MR and MR GTVs. A mean of 64 %, 74 % and 77 % of the PET GTVs were included within the CT, MR and CT-MR GTVs respectively. A mean of 57 % of the MR GTVs were included within the CT GTV; conversely a mean of 63 % of the CT GTVs were included within the MR GTV. CT inter-observer variability was found to be significantly higher in terms of position and/or volume than both MR and CT-MR (p < 0.05). Significant differences in GTV volume were found between GTV volumes delineated by radiologists (9.7 cm.sup.3) and oncologists (14.6 cm.sup.3) for all modalities (p = 0.001). The use of different imaging modalities produced significantly different GTVs, with no single imaging technique encompassing all potential GTV regions. The use of MR reduced inter-observer variability. These data suggest delineation based on multimodality imaging has the potential to improve accuracy of GTV definition.
BACKGROUNDThis study aimed to quantify the variation in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma gross tumour volume (GTV) delineation between CT, MR and FDG PET-CT imaging.METHODSA prospective, single centre, pilot study was undertaken where 11 patients with locally advanced oropharyngeal cancers (2 tonsil, 9 base of tongue primaries) underwent pre-treatment, contrast enhanced, FDG PET-CT and MR imaging, all performed in a radiotherapy treatment mask. CT, MR and CT-MR GTVs were contoured by 5 clinicians (2 radiologists and 3 radiation oncologists). A semi-automated segmentation algorithm was used to contour PET GTVs. Volume and positional analyses were undertaken, accounting for inter-observer variation, using linear mixed effects models and contour comparison metrics respectively.RESULTSSignificant differences in mean GTV volume were found between CT (11.9 cm(3)) and CT-MR (14.1 cm(3)), p < 0.006, CT-MR and PET (9.5 cm(3)), p < 0.0009, and MR (12.7 cm(3)) and PET, p < 0.016. Substantial differences in GTV position were found between all modalities with the exception of CT-MR and MR GTVs. A mean of 64 %, 74 % and 77 % of the PET GTVs were included within the CT, MR and CT-MR GTVs respectively. A mean of 57 % of the MR GTVs were included within the CT GTV; conversely a mean of 63 % of the CT GTVs were included within the MR GTV. CT inter-observer variability was found to be significantly higher in terms of position and/or volume than both MR and CT-MR (p < 0.05). Significant differences in GTV volume were found between GTV volumes delineated by radiologists (9.7 cm(3)) and oncologists (14.6 cm(3)) for all modalities (p = 0.001).CONCLUSIONSThe use of different imaging modalities produced significantly different GTVs, with no single imaging technique encompassing all potential GTV regions. The use of MR reduced inter-observer variability. These data suggest delineation based on multimodality imaging has the potential to improve accuracy of GTV definition.TRIAL REGISTRATIONISRCTN Registry: ISRCTN34165059 . Registered 2nd February 2015.
Background This study aimed to quantify the variation in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma gross tumour volume (GTV) delineation between CT, MR and FDG PET-CT imaging. Methods A prospective, single centre, pilot study was undertaken where 11 patients with locally advanced oropharyngeal cancers (2 tonsil, 9 base of tongue primaries) underwent pre-treatment, contrast enhanced, FDG PET-CT and MR imaging, all performed in a radiotherapy treatment mask. CT, MR and CT-MR GTVs were contoured by 5 clinicians (2 radiologists and 3 radiation oncologists). A semi-automated segmentation algorithm was used to contour PET GTVs. Volume and positional analyses were undertaken, accounting for inter-observer variation, using linear mixed effects models and contour comparison metrics respectively. Results Significant differences in mean GTV volume were found between CT (11.9 cm 3 ) and CT-MR (14.1 cm 3 ), p  < 0.006, CT-MR and PET (9.5 cm 3 ), p  < 0.0009, and MR (12.7 cm 3 ) and PET, p  < 0.016. Substantial differences in GTV position were found between all modalities with the exception of CT-MR and MR GTVs. A mean of 64 %, 74 % and 77 % of the PET GTVs were included within the CT, MR and CT-MR GTVs respectively. A mean of 57 % of the MR GTVs were included within the CT GTV; conversely a mean of 63 % of the CT GTVs were included within the MR GTV. CT inter-observer variability was found to be significantly higher in terms of position and/or volume than both MR and CT-MR ( p  < 0.05). Significant differences in GTV volume were found between GTV volumes delineated by radiologists (9.7 cm 3 ) and oncologists (14.6 cm 3 ) for all modalities ( p  = 0.001). Conclusions The use of different imaging modalities produced significantly different GTVs, with no single imaging technique encompassing all potential GTV regions. The use of MR reduced inter-observer variability. These data suggest delineation based on multimodality imaging has the potential to improve accuracy of GTV definition. Trial registration ISRCTN Registry: ISRCTN34165059 . Registered 2nd February 2015.
This study aimed to quantify the variation in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma gross tumour volume (GTV) delineation between CT, MR and FDG PET-CT imaging. A prospective, single centre, pilot study was undertaken where 11 patients with locally advanced oropharyngeal cancers (2 tonsil, 9 base of tongue primaries) underwent pre-treatment, contrast enhanced, FDG PET-CT and MR imaging, all performed in a radiotherapy treatment mask. CT, MR and CT-MR GTVs were contoured by 5 clinicians (2 radiologists and 3 radiation oncologists). A semi-automated segmentation algorithm was used to contour PET GTVs. Volume and positional analyses were undertaken, accounting for inter-observer variation, using linear mixed effects models and contour comparison metrics respectively. Significant differences in mean GTV volume were found between CT (11.9 cm(3)) and CT-MR (14.1 cm(3)), p < 0.006, CT-MR and PET (9.5 cm(3)), p < 0.0009, and MR (12.7 cm(3)) and PET, p < 0.016. Substantial differences in GTV position were found between all modalities with the exception of CT-MR and MR GTVs. A mean of 64 %, 74 % and 77 % of the PET GTVs were included within the CT, MR and CT-MR GTVs respectively. A mean of 57 % of the MR GTVs were included within the CT GTV; conversely a mean of 63 % of the CT GTVs were included within the MR GTV. CT inter-observer variability was found to be significantly higher in terms of position and/or volume than both MR and CT-MR (p < 0.05). Significant differences in GTV volume were found between GTV volumes delineated by radiologists (9.7 cm(3)) and oncologists (14.6 cm(3)) for all modalities (p = 0.001). The use of different imaging modalities produced significantly different GTVs, with no single imaging technique encompassing all potential GTV regions. The use of MR reduced inter-observer variability. These data suggest delineation based on multimodality imaging has the potential to improve accuracy of GTV definition. ISRCTN Registry: ISRCTN34165059 . Registered 2nd February 2015.
Background This study aimed to quantify the variation in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma gross tumour volume (GTV) delineation between CT, MR and FDG PET-CT imaging. Methods A prospective, single centre, pilot study was undertaken where 11 patients with locally advanced oropharyngeal cancers (2 tonsil, 9 base of tongue primaries) underwent pre-treatment, contrast enhanced, FDG PET-CT and MR imaging, all performed in a radiotherapy treatment mask. CT, MR and CT-MR GTVs were contoured by 5 clinicians (2 radiologists and 3 radiation oncologists). A semi-automated segmentation algorithm was used to contour PET GTVs. Volume and positional analyses were undertaken, accounting for inter-observer variation, using linear mixed effects models and contour comparison metrics respectively. Results Significant differences in mean GTV volume were found between CT (11.9 cm3) and CT-MR (14.1 cm3), p < 0.006, CT-MR and PET (9.5 cm3), p < 0.0009, and MR (12.7 cm3) and PET, p < 0.016. Substantial differences in GTV position were found between all modalities with the exception of CT-MR and MR GTVs. A mean of 64 %, 74 % and 77 % of the PET GTVs were included within the CT, MR and CT-MR GTVs respectively. A mean of 57 % of the MR GTVs were included within the CT GTV; conversely a mean of 63 % of the CT GTVs were included within the MR GTV. CT inter-observer variability was found to be significantly higher in terms of position and/or volume than both MR and CT-MR (p < 0.05). Significant differences in GTV volume were found between GTV volumes delineated by radiologists (9.7 cm3) and oncologists (14.6 cm3) for all modalities (p = 0.001). Conclusions The use of different imaging modalities produced significantly different GTVs, with no single imaging technique encompassing all potential GTV regions. The use of MR reduced inter-observer variability. These data suggest delineation based on multimodality imaging has the potential to improve accuracy of GTV definition.
Background This study aimed to quantify the variation in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma gross tumour volume (GTV) delineation between CT, MR and FDG PET-CT imaging. Methods A prospective, single centre, pilot study was undertaken where 11 patients with locally advanced oropharyngeal cancers (2 tonsil, 9 base of tongue primaries) underwent pre-treatment, contrast enhanced, FDG PET-CT and MR imaging, all performed in a radiotherapy treatment mask. CT, MR and CT-MR GTVs were contoured by 5 clinicians (2 radiologists and 3 radiation oncologists). A semi-automated segmentation algorithm was used to contour PET GTVs. Volume and positional analyses were undertaken, accounting for inter-observer variation, using linear mixed effects models and contour comparison metrics respectively. Results Significant differences in mean GTV volume were found between CT (11.9 cm.sup.3) and CT-MR (14.1 cm.sup.3), p < 0.006, CT-MR and PET (9.5 cm.sup.3), p < 0.0009, and MR (12.7 cm.sup.3) and PET, p < 0.016. Substantial differences in GTV position were found between all modalities with the exception of CT-MR and MR GTVs. A mean of 64 %, 74 % and 77 % of the PET GTVs were included within the CT, MR and CT-MR GTVs respectively. A mean of 57 % of the MR GTVs were included within the CT GTV; conversely a mean of 63 % of the CT GTVs were included within the MR GTV. CT inter-observer variability was found to be significantly higher in terms of position and/or volume than both MR and CT-MR (p < 0.05). Significant differences in GTV volume were found between GTV volumes delineated by radiologists (9.7 cm.sup.3) and oncologists (14.6 cm.sup.3) for all modalities (p = 0.001). Conclusions The use of different imaging modalities produced significantly different GTVs, with no single imaging technique encompassing all potential GTV regions. The use of MR reduced inter-observer variability. These data suggest delineation based on multimodality imaging has the potential to improve accuracy of GTV definition. Trial registration ISRCTN Registry: ISRCTN34165059. Registered 2nd February 2015. Keywords: Head and neck squamous cell cancer, Radiotherapy, Gross tumour volume, Delineation, Computed tomography, Fluorodeoxyglucose F18, Positron-emission tomography, Magnetic resonance imaging
ArticleNumber 844
Audience Academic
Author Prestwich, Robin J.D.
Wilson, Daniel J.
Bayman, Evrim
Sykes, Jonathan
Ramasamy, Satiavani
Roberts, Neil
Carey, Brendan
Karakaya, Ebru
McDermott, Gary
Speight, Richard
Bird, David
Scarsbrook, Andrew F.
Subesinghe, Manil
Sen, Mehmet
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: David
  surname: Bird
  fullname: Bird, David
  organization: Department of Radiotherapy Physics, St. James’ University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Andrew F.
  surname: Scarsbrook
  fullname: Scarsbrook, Andrew F.
  organization: Department of Nuclear Medicine, St. James’ University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Department of Clinical Radiology, St. James’ University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Jonathan
  surname: Sykes
  fullname: Sykes, Jonathan
  organization: Department of Radiotherapy Physics, St. James’ University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Satiavani
  surname: Ramasamy
  fullname: Ramasamy, Satiavani
  organization: Department of Clinical Oncology, St. James’ University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Manil
  surname: Subesinghe
  fullname: Subesinghe, Manil
  organization: Department of Nuclear Medicine, St. James’ University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Department of Clinical Radiology, St. James’ University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Brendan
  surname: Carey
  fullname: Carey, Brendan
  organization: Department of Clinical Radiology, St. James’ University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Daniel J.
  surname: Wilson
  fullname: Wilson, Daniel J.
  organization: Department of Medical Physics, St. James’ University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Neil
  surname: Roberts
  fullname: Roberts, Neil
  organization: Department of Radiotherapy, St. James’ University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Gary
  surname: McDermott
  fullname: McDermott, Gary
  organization: Department of Medical Physics, St. James’ University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
– sequence: 10
  givenname: Ebru
  surname: Karakaya
  fullname: Karakaya, Ebru
  organization: Department of Clinical Oncology, St. James’ University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
– sequence: 11
  givenname: Evrim
  surname: Bayman
  fullname: Bayman, Evrim
  organization: Department of Clinical Oncology, St. James’ University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
– sequence: 12
  givenname: Mehmet
  surname: Sen
  fullname: Sen, Mehmet
  organization: Department of Clinical Oncology, St. James’ University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
– sequence: 13
  givenname: Richard
  surname: Speight
  fullname: Speight, Richard
  organization: Department of Radiotherapy Physics, St. James’ University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
– sequence: 14
  givenname: Robin J.D.
  surname: Prestwich
  fullname: Prestwich, Robin J.D.
  email: Robin.Prestwich@nhs.net
  organization: Department of Clinical Oncology, St. James’ University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26530182$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9kl9v1SAYxhsz4_7oB_DGkJgYTewEWgq9MVmO21yyRTOP14QBbVlaOAM6PZd-c6ln09NFDReF9vc89H3fZz_bsc7qLHuO4CFCrHoXEGaM5BCRPB1pzh5le6ikKMclpDtb-91sP4RrCBFlkD3JdnFFCogY3st-XIx9NINTojdxDcwgWmNb8M3EDiyWb8HFJRBWgZMPp_nn4yVonAdeKONip71YrUEUvtUR3Lp-HDRQujdWi2icBcYC592qE35tWy16EG5GMbgxAKn7HkjhpbFuEE-zx43og3529zzIvp4cLxcf8_NPp2eLo_NcVhDHvKyulCCKsUYgKouKaiLKmmiiMFKaMYproeumLipZ46KURFEkmWoapBlJ3SoOsvcb39V4NWgltY1e9HzlU81-zZ0wfP7Fmo637paXVYGLCieD13cG3t2MOkQ-mDDVIqxOZXFEC1gxktiEvnyAXrvR21ReomhdMQjL-g_Vil5zYxuX7pWTKT8qS0IYriBM1OFfqLSUHoxMgWhMej8TvJkJEhP199iKMQR-9uVyzr7aYrs0ptiFNMtpgmEOvtju3u-23ScpAXQDSO9C8Lrh0sRfSUi_a3qOIJ8yyzeZ5SmzfMosnwaDHijvzf-nwRtNSGyKl99q8D9FPwGIofxS
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1007_s00117_018_0420_6
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prro_2021_08_007
crossref_primary_10_4103_jcrt_jcrt_266_21
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_radonc_2016_10_012
crossref_primary_10_1109_TMI_2019_2923601
crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2020_550096
crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2020_614008
crossref_primary_10_5114_pjr_2020_96156
crossref_primary_10_1259_bjr_20170590
crossref_primary_10_1088_1361_6560_abe553
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ctro_2022_08_005
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_radonc_2023_109645
crossref_primary_10_1038_nrclinonc_2016_185
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_018_5511_2
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00066_018_1309_z
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00259_020_05125_x
crossref_primary_10_23736_S1824_4785_18_03087_X
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clon_2021_02_003
crossref_primary_10_1097_COC_0000000000001250
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijrobp_2022_01_050
crossref_primary_10_1088_1361_6560_acb9cf
crossref_primary_10_3390_healthcare6040135
crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers14123027
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mednuc_2020_01_132
crossref_primary_10_1002_hed_27131
crossref_primary_10_3389_fmed_2023_1217037
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_radonc_2016_07_016
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_radonc_2023_109574
crossref_primary_10_1053_j_semnuclmed_2020_07_010
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_radonc_2017_02_005
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_phro_2020_04_001
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijrobp_2016_03_038
crossref_primary_10_1111_vru_12584
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mednuc_2016_01_002
crossref_primary_10_1002_jmrs_552
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_semradonc_2023_10_003
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clon_2019_03_001
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_critrevonc_2017_12_007
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_radonc_2017_10_004
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13014_023_02326_0
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mric_2023_08_001
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13014_017_0777_0
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clon_2025_103911
crossref_primary_10_1111_ajco_12704
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cpet_2025_04_001
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ctro_2024_100837
crossref_primary_10_1111_1754_9485_12866
crossref_primary_10_3389_fvets_2023_1143986
crossref_primary_10_1002_acm2_13291
Cites_doi 10.1148/radiol.2331030660
10.1148/rg.337125163
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.05.004
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.10.032
10.1186/2191-219X-2-56
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.08.004
10.1159/000106036
10.1016/j.radonc.2014.06.001
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.10.029
10.1007/s00259-010-1423-3
10.1007/s00259-008-0875-1
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.05.060
10.4103/0971-6203.44472
10.1016/j.semradonc.2005.01.005
10.1016/j.clon.2012.04.002
10.1016/S0959-8049(09)70089-9
10.1109/TMI.2012.2202322
10.1007/s00259-011-1899-5
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.10.041
10.1259/bjr/27674581
10.2967/jnumed.109.066241
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.10.010
10.2307/1932409
10.1186/1748-717X-5-21
10.1016/j.radonc.2009.12.021
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.02.042
10.2967/jnumed.108.061499
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.01.014
10.1016/j.radonc.2010.07.003
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Bird et al. 2015
COPYRIGHT 2015 BioMed Central Ltd.
Copyright BioMed Central 2015
Copyright_xml – notice: Bird et al. 2015
– notice: COPYRIGHT 2015 BioMed Central Ltd.
– notice: Copyright BioMed Central 2015
DBID C6C
AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
ISR
3V.
7TO
7X7
7XB
88E
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AFKRA
AZQEC
BENPR
CCPQU
DWQXO
FYUFA
GHDGH
H94
K9.
M0S
M1P
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
7U8
7X8
C1K
JXQ
5PM
DOI 10.1186/s12885-015-1867-8
DatabaseName Springer Nature OA Free Journals
CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
Gale In Context: Science
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts
Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
Hospital Premium Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Central
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)
PML(ProQuest Medical Library)
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
One Health & Nursing
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic (retired)
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
TOXLINE
MEDLINE - Academic
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
Toxline
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
Publicly Available Content Database
Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Central
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
Health Research Premium Collection
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central Korea
Health & Medical Research Collection
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest Medical Library
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
TOXLINE
MEDLINE - Academic
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
DatabaseTitleList
TOXLINE

MEDLINE
Publicly Available Content Database



Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: PIMPY
  name: Publicly Available Content Database
  url: http://search.proquest.com/publiccontent
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1471-2407
EndPage 844
ExternalDocumentID PMC4632362
4016134481
A445582600
26530182
10_1186_s12885_015_1867_8
Genre Clinical Trial
Journal Article
GeographicLocations United Kingdom--UK
GeographicLocations_xml – name: United Kingdom--UK
GroupedDBID ---
0R~
23N
2WC
4.4
53G
5VS
6J9
6PF
7X7
88E
8FI
8FJ
AAFWJ
AAJSJ
AASML
AAWTL
ABDBF
ABUWG
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACIHN
ACMJI
ACPRK
ACUHS
ADBBV
ADRAZ
ADUKV
AEAQA
AENEX
AFKRA
AFPKN
AHBYD
AHMBA
AHSBF
AHYZX
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMKLP
AMTXH
AOIJS
BAPOH
BAWUL
BCNDV
BENPR
BFQNJ
BMC
BPHCQ
BVXVI
C6C
CCPQU
CS3
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EAD
EAP
EAS
EBD
EBLON
EBS
EJD
EMB
EMK
EMOBN
ESX
F5P
FYUFA
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
HMCUK
HYE
IAO
IHR
IHW
INH
INR
ISR
ITC
KQ8
M1P
M48
M~E
O5R
O5S
OK1
OVT
P2P
PGMZT
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PJZUB
PPXIY
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
PUEGO
RBZ
RNS
ROL
RPM
RSV
SBL
SOJ
SV3
TR2
TUS
U2A
UKHRP
W2D
WOQ
WOW
XSB
AAYXX
AFFHD
CITATION
ALIPV
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
3V.
7TO
7XB
8FK
AZQEC
DWQXO
H94
K9.
PKEHL
PQEST
PQUKI
PRINS
7U8
7X8
C1K
JXQ
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c602t-46bda5d88fa17c367e5a495e5d21de88729ae9f936c9234c5d71c8dff1e851183
IEDL.DBID RSV
ISICitedReferencesCount 54
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000364116700005&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 1471-2407
IngestDate Tue Nov 04 02:00:26 EST 2025
Thu Sep 04 15:59:37 EDT 2025
Sun Nov 30 04:37:55 EST 2025
Tue Nov 11 10:57:47 EST 2025
Tue Nov 04 18:18:46 EST 2025
Thu Nov 13 16:43:00 EST 2025
Thu May 22 21:24:05 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 03 07:05:56 EDT 2025
Sat Nov 29 04:29:35 EST 2025
Tue Nov 18 22:08:38 EST 2025
Sat Sep 06 07:24:30 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords Positron-emission tomography
Computed tomography
Magnetic resonance imaging
Delineation
Gross tumour volume
Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
Head and neck squamous cell cancer
Radiotherapy
Language English
License Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c602t-46bda5d88fa17c367e5a495e5d21de88729ae9f936c9234c5d71c8dff1e851183
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://link.springer.com/10.1186/s12885-015-1867-8
PMID 26530182
PQID 1779680049
PQPubID 44074
PageCount 1
ParticipantIDs pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4632362
proquest_miscellaneous_1730685236
proquest_journals_1779680049
gale_infotracmisc_A445582600
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A445582600
gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A445582600
gale_healthsolutions_A445582600
pubmed_primary_26530182
crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_s12885_015_1867_8
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12885_015_1867_8
springer_journals_10_1186_s12885_015_1867_8
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2015-11-04
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2015-11-04
PublicationDate_xml – month: 11
  year: 2015
  text: 2015-11-04
  day: 04
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace London
PublicationPlace_xml – name: London
– name: England
PublicationTitle BMC cancer
PublicationTitleAbbrev BMC Cancer
PublicationTitleAlternate BMC Cancer
PublicationYear 2015
Publisher BioMed Central
BioMed Central Ltd
Springer Nature B.V
Publisher_xml – name: BioMed Central
– name: BioMed Central Ltd
– name: Springer Nature B.V
References JS Cooper (1867_CR7) 2007; 67
A Thiagarajan (1867_CR19) 2012; 83
AS Garden (1867_CR14) 2013; 85
A Schaefer (1867_CR20) 2008; 35
1867_CR22
1867_CR23
MB David (1867_CR1) 2007; 40
A Eisbruch (1867_CR2) 2004; 59
BT West (1867_CR21) 2015
M Ahmed (1867_CR17) 2010; 94
V Gregoire (1867_CR11) 2009; 45
LR Dice (1867_CR24) 1945; 26
J Setton (1867_CR15) 2012; 82
P Bhatnagar (1867_CR9) 2013; 33
T Shepherd (1867_CR26) 2012; 31
P Cheebsumon (1867_CR33) 2012; 2
R Maroldi (1867_CR8) 1999; 82
AK Due (1867_CR13) 2014; 111
C Rasch (1867_CR4) 2005; 15
CF Njeh (1867_CR5) 2008; 33
JF Daisne (1867_CR18) 2004; 233
R Jena (1867_CR25) 2010; 83
AC Riegel (1867_CR29) 2006; 65
P Cheebsumon (1867_CR32) 2011; 38
RJ Prestwich (1867_CR10) 2012; 24
H Zaidi (1867_CR30) 2010; 37
P Tylski (1867_CR31) 2010; 51
O Warburg (1867_CR12) 1930
J Caldas-Magalhaes (1867_CR34) 2012; 82
GO Schoenfeld (1867_CR3) 2008; 71
JA Lee (1867_CR27) 2010; 96
EG Troost (1867_CR28) 2010; 51
CR Rasch (1867_CR6) 2010; 5
SA Raktoe (1867_CR16) 2013; 85
20096947 - Radiother Oncol. 2010 Feb;94(2):161-7
18164838 - Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Jun 1;71(2):377-85
20009000 - J Nucl Med. 2010 Jan;51(1):66-76
21167652 - Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Jan 1;82(1):291-8
15983939 - Semin Radiat Oncol. 2005 Jul;15(3):136-45
19893706 - J Med Phys. 2008 Oct;33(4):136-40
20080896 - J Nucl Med. 2010 Feb;51(2):268-76
20336455 - Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010 Nov;37(11):2165-87
17208386 - Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Mar 15;67(4):972-5
22592142 - Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2012 Oct;24(8):577-89
20708286 - Radiother Oncol. 2010 Sep;96(3):302-7
17641510 - Front Radiat Ther Oncol. 2007;40:193-207
18661128 - Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008 Nov;35(11):1989-99
10670171 - JBR-BTR. 1999 Dec;82(6):294-300
22975604 - Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Mar 15;85(4):941-7
19775671 - Eur J Cancer. 2009 Sep;45 Suppl 1:459-60
24993331 - Radiother Oncol. 2014 Jun;111(3):360-5
15093896 - Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 May 1;59(1):28-42
21858528 - Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011 Dec;38(12):2136-44
23034289 - EJNMMI Res. 2012 Oct 03;2(1):56
24224586 - Radiographics. 2013 Nov-Dec;33(7):1909-29
22035663 - Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 May 1;83(1):220-7
22692898 - IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2012 Nov;31(11):2006-24
16626888 - Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Jul 1;65(3):726-32
19620177 - Br J Radiol. 2010 Jan;83(985):44-51
22541959 - Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Jan 1;85(1):136-41
20230613 - Radiat Oncol. 2010;5:21
21719209 - Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Feb 1;82(2):e289-98
15317953 - Radiology. 2004 Oct;233(1):93-100
References_xml – volume: 233
  start-page: 93
  issue: 1
  year: 2004
  ident: 1867_CR18
  publication-title: Radiology
  doi: 10.1148/radiol.2331030660
– volume: 33
  start-page: 1909
  issue: 7
  year: 2013
  ident: 1867_CR9
  publication-title: Radiographics
  doi: 10.1148/rg.337125163
– volume: 82
  start-page: e289
  issue: 2
  year: 2012
  ident: 1867_CR34
  publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.05.004
– volume: 59
  start-page: 28
  issue: 1
  year: 2004
  ident: 1867_CR2
  publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.10.032
– volume: 2
  start-page: 56
  issue: 1
  year: 2012
  ident: 1867_CR33
  publication-title: EJNMMI Res
  doi: 10.1186/2191-219X-2-56
– volume: 85
  start-page: 941
  issue: 4
  year: 2013
  ident: 1867_CR14
  publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.08.004
– volume: 40
  start-page: 193
  year: 2007
  ident: 1867_CR1
  publication-title: Front Radiat Ther Oncol
  doi: 10.1159/000106036
– volume: 111
  start-page: 360
  issue: 3
  year: 2014
  ident: 1867_CR13
  publication-title: Radiother Oncol
  doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2014.06.001
– ident: 1867_CR22
– volume: 67
  start-page: 972
  issue: 4
  year: 2007
  ident: 1867_CR7
  publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.10.029
– volume: 37
  start-page: 2165
  issue: 11
  year: 2010
  ident: 1867_CR30
  publication-title: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging
  doi: 10.1007/s00259-010-1423-3
– volume: 35
  start-page: 1989
  issue: 11
  year: 2008
  ident: 1867_CR20
  publication-title: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging
  doi: 10.1007/s00259-008-0875-1
– volume: 83
  start-page: 220
  issue: 1
  year: 2012
  ident: 1867_CR19
  publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.05.060
– volume: 33
  start-page: 136
  issue: 4
  year: 2008
  ident: 1867_CR5
  publication-title: J Med Phys
  doi: 10.4103/0971-6203.44472
– volume: 15
  start-page: 136
  issue: 3
  year: 2005
  ident: 1867_CR4
  publication-title: Semin Radiat Oncol
  doi: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2005.01.005
– volume: 24
  start-page: 577
  issue: 8
  year: 2012
  ident: 1867_CR10
  publication-title: Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)
  doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2012.04.002
– volume: 45
  start-page: 459
  issue: Suppl 1
  year: 2009
  ident: 1867_CR11
  publication-title: Eur J Cancer
  doi: 10.1016/S0959-8049(09)70089-9
– volume: 31
  start-page: 2006
  issue: 11
  year: 2012
  ident: 1867_CR26
  publication-title: IEEE Trans Med Imaging
  doi: 10.1109/TMI.2012.2202322
– volume: 38
  start-page: 2136
  issue: 12
  year: 2011
  ident: 1867_CR32
  publication-title: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging
  doi: 10.1007/s00259-011-1899-5
– volume: 82
  start-page: 291
  issue: 1
  year: 2012
  ident: 1867_CR15
  publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.10.041
– volume-title: Linear mixed models: A practice guide using statistical software
  year: 2015
  ident: 1867_CR21
– volume: 83
  start-page: 44
  issue: 985
  year: 2010
  ident: 1867_CR25
  publication-title: Br J Radiol
  doi: 10.1259/bjr/27674581
– volume: 51
  start-page: 268
  issue: 2
  year: 2010
  ident: 1867_CR31
  publication-title: J Nucl Med
  doi: 10.2967/jnumed.109.066241
– volume: 71
  start-page: 377
  issue: 2
  year: 2008
  ident: 1867_CR3
  publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.10.010
– volume: 26
  start-page: 297
  issue: 3
  year: 1945
  ident: 1867_CR24
  publication-title: Ecology
  doi: 10.2307/1932409
– volume: 5
  start-page: 21
  year: 2010
  ident: 1867_CR6
  publication-title: Radiat Oncol
  doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-5-21
– volume: 82
  start-page: 294
  issue: 6
  year: 1999
  ident: 1867_CR8
  publication-title: JBR-BTR
– volume: 94
  start-page: 161
  issue: 2
  year: 2010
  ident: 1867_CR17
  publication-title: Radiother Oncol
  doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2009.12.021
– volume: 85
  start-page: 136
  issue: 1
  year: 2013
  ident: 1867_CR16
  publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.02.042
– volume: 51
  start-page: 66
  issue: 1
  year: 2010
  ident: 1867_CR28
  publication-title: J Nucl Med
  doi: 10.2967/jnumed.108.061499
– ident: 1867_CR23
– volume-title: The metabolism of tumours
  year: 1930
  ident: 1867_CR12
– volume: 65
  start-page: 726
  issue: 3
  year: 2006
  ident: 1867_CR29
  publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.01.014
– volume: 96
  start-page: 302
  issue: 3
  year: 2010
  ident: 1867_CR27
  publication-title: Radiother Oncol
  doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2010.07.003
– reference: 19893706 - J Med Phys. 2008 Oct;33(4):136-40
– reference: 19775671 - Eur J Cancer. 2009 Sep;45 Suppl 1:459-60
– reference: 20708286 - Radiother Oncol. 2010 Sep;96(3):302-7
– reference: 21167652 - Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Jan 1;82(1):291-8
– reference: 22692898 - IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2012 Nov;31(11):2006-24
– reference: 24993331 - Radiother Oncol. 2014 Jun;111(3):360-5
– reference: 18164838 - Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Jun 1;71(2):377-85
– reference: 17208386 - Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Mar 15;67(4):972-5
– reference: 20336455 - Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010 Nov;37(11):2165-87
– reference: 20080896 - J Nucl Med. 2010 Feb;51(2):268-76
– reference: 16626888 - Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Jul 1;65(3):726-32
– reference: 21858528 - Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011 Dec;38(12):2136-44
– reference: 24224586 - Radiographics. 2013 Nov-Dec;33(7):1909-29
– reference: 10670171 - JBR-BTR. 1999 Dec;82(6):294-300
– reference: 15983939 - Semin Radiat Oncol. 2005 Jul;15(3):136-45
– reference: 21719209 - Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Feb 1;82(2):e289-98
– reference: 20096947 - Radiother Oncol. 2010 Feb;94(2):161-7
– reference: 19620177 - Br J Radiol. 2010 Jan;83(985):44-51
– reference: 23034289 - EJNMMI Res. 2012 Oct 03;2(1):56
– reference: 20230613 - Radiat Oncol. 2010;5:21
– reference: 22541959 - Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Jan 1;85(1):136-41
– reference: 18661128 - Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008 Nov;35(11):1989-99
– reference: 17641510 - Front Radiat Ther Oncol. 2007;40:193-207
– reference: 22592142 - Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2012 Oct;24(8):577-89
– reference: 15317953 - Radiology. 2004 Oct;233(1):93-100
– reference: 22975604 - Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Mar 15;85(4):941-7
– reference: 15093896 - Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 May 1;59(1):28-42
– reference: 20009000 - J Nucl Med. 2010 Jan;51(1):66-76
– reference: 22035663 - Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 May 1;83(1):220-7
SSID ssj0017808
Score 2.3848705
Snippet Background This study aimed to quantify the variation in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma gross tumour volume (GTV) delineation between CT, MR and FDG...
This study aimed to quantify the variation in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma gross tumour volume (GTV) delineation between CT, MR and FDG PET-CT...
Background This study aimed to quantify the variation in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma gross tumour volume (GTV) delineation between CT, MR and FDG...
BACKGROUNDThis study aimed to quantify the variation in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma gross tumour volume (GTV) delineation between CT, MR and FDG...
SourceID pubmedcentral
proquest
gale
pubmed
crossref
springer
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 844
SubjectTerms Adult
Aged
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Biomedicine
Cancer
Cancer Research
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - diagnostic imaging
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - pathology
Care and treatment
Complications and side effects
Consent
Diagnostic imaging
Female
Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 - chemistry
Health aspects
Health Promotion and Disease Prevention
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
Male
Medicine/Public Health
Middle Aged
Oncology
Oropharyngeal Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Oropharyngeal Neoplasms - pathology
Patients
Positron-Emission Tomography - methods
Radiation therapy
Radiotherapy
Research Article
Research ethics
Squamous cell carcinoma
Surgical Oncology
Tomography
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Tumors
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: Publicly Available Content Database
  dbid: PIMPY
  link: http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1LbxMxELYgRYgL70eggEFISICVfdhe54Sq0kAPqaJSpHKyHNtLI5HdNJsg9cg_Z2bXWbqR6InbSh5b9s7489jzIuSN8iqVoLiyqRM548JI-MpT5iNp3TQWKrF5XWwiOzpSp6fDSQiProJb5QYTa6Busj2j3zaA8MCVFl_MB3GWDaVC9fbj4pxhDSm0tYaCGtfJDibeinpkZ3I4nnxvrQqZilSwbMZKDirAZoWua4JhWjemOmfTNkJfOqK23Se3bKj10TS6838XdZfcDioq3Wtk6h655ov75OY4GOEfkN910O68dLUKT2fzutARxRddun_ygY6PqSkcHX36zCYHJxS0Yro0bhZCvS5o43xOG1ykDgPiG8WVzgpaLsvFmVlewDphDtX52uDbBEX7ArVY96go5-Yh-TY6ONn_wkIlB2ZllKwYl1NnhFMqN3FmU5l5YeBm5oVLYucB5xLMEZ4PU2lB4eRWuCy2yuV57FEjVOkj0ivKwj8hFIbhaWoFz13MpwpGyaZcKDMUkcfqNX0SbXiobUhzjtU2fur6uqOkbtiuge0a2a6hy7u2y6LJ8XEV8UsUDN2Eqbb4oPc4FyDZoD_2yeuaArNrFOi-88Osq0offj3uEL0NRHkJ07MmREPAIjEhV4dyt0MJ2992mzeipQP8VPqvJPXJq7YZe6JLXeGBcUADt0UlklT2yeNGoNvVJ1IA8KukT7KOqLcEmJS821LMzurk5FymMCT0fL_ZFJem9a-f-vTqRTwjt5J6l8Ys4rukt1qu_XNyw_5azarli7DL_wBCsGGF
  priority: 102
  providerName: ProQuest
Title Multimodality imaging with CT, MR and FDG-PET for radiotherapy target volume delineation in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma
URI https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12885-015-1867-8
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26530182
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1779680049
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1730685236
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC4632362
Volume 15
WOSCitedRecordID wos000364116700005&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVADU
  databaseName: Open Access: BioMedCentral Open Access Titles
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1471-2407
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0017808
  issn: 1471-2407
  databaseCode: RBZ
  dateStart: 20010101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.biomedcentral.com/search/
  providerName: BioMedCentral
– providerCode: PRVAON
  databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1471-2407
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0017808
  issn: 1471-2407
  databaseCode: DOA
  dateStart: 20010101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.doaj.org/
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
– providerCode: PRVHPJ
  databaseName: ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1471-2407
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0017808
  issn: 1471-2407
  databaseCode: M~E
  dateStart: 20010101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://road.issn.org
  providerName: ISSN International Centre
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: Health & Medical Collection
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1471-2407
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0017808
  issn: 1471-2407
  databaseCode: 7X7
  dateStart: 20090101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/healthcomplete
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: ProQuest Central
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1471-2407
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0017808
  issn: 1471-2407
  databaseCode: BENPR
  dateStart: 20090101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.proquest.com/central
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: Publicly Available Content Database
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1471-2407
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0017808
  issn: 1471-2407
  databaseCode: PIMPY
  dateStart: 20090101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: http://search.proquest.com/publiccontent
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVAVX
  databaseName: SpringerLink
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1471-2407
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0017808
  issn: 1471-2407
  databaseCode: RSV
  dateStart: 20011201
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://link.springer.com/search?facet-content-type=%22Journal%22
  providerName: Springer Nature
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnR3LjtMw0GJ3EeLC-1FYikFISEBEHn71uCwt7KFV1S2onCzXTthKNFmaFmmP_DkzThptKkCCS5TIM5Zjz4zHnhchL1SqEgGKazB3PAsYNwLesiRIQ2HdPOIqtpkvNiFHIzWb9cZ1HHe59XbfmiS9pPZsrcTbEiSpQkczHmAStkDtkQOOyWbwiH76uTEdSBWq2nz5W7TWBrQrhi_tQ7s-kjuGUr__DG7-18hvkRu1ukmPKvq4Ta6k-R1ybVgb1O-Snz4Ad1k4r47TxdIXLaJ4O0uPp2_ocEJN7ujg_Ydg3J9S0HDpyrhFHbZ1QStHclrJOOowuL1SQukip8WqOD8zqwsYKoyh_L4xeM9A0VZALdYwyouluUc-DfrT449BXZUhsCKM1wETc2e4UyozkbSJkCk3cMpKuYsjl4LMijHfd9ZLhAXlkVnuZGSVy7IoRe1OJffJfl7k6UNCoRuWJJazzEVsrqAXOWdcmR4PU6xE0yHhdqm0rVOWY-WMb9ofXZTQ1dRqmFqNU6sB5VWDcl7l6_gb8FNcf12FnDa8ro8Y40CloAt2yHMPgZkycnTF-Wo2ZalPTictoJc1UFbA8KypIxvgJzG5VgvysAUJrGzbzVtC1LUoKXUkZU8oPMl1yLOmGTHRPS5PYeEABk5-iseJ6JAHFd02fx8LDkJcxR0iWxTdAGCC8XZLvjjzicaZSKBLwHy9petLw_rTpD76J-jH5HrsGSMKQnZI9terTfqEXLU_1oty1SV7cib9U3XJwbv-aDzp-lsT-BqfDMdfup73fwGV8VBA
linkProvider Springer Nature
linkToHtml http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMw1R3JbhMx1CopAi7sS6BQg0BIwKiz2eMcEKrahkZtqqgEqZyMY3toJDKTZhJQjvwQ38h7s9GJRG89cBvJz5bteavfRshLYUXAQXF1RobFTsgUh684cKzLtRl5TPg6zptNREdH4uSkM1gjv6tcGAyrrHhizqhNqvGNfMuLog4XqNB-mJ452DUKvatVC40CLQ7s8ieYbNn73i7831e-390b7uw7ZVcBR3PXnzshHxnFjBCx8iId8MgyBVaCZcb3jAWa87FeddwJuAblJ9TMRJ4WJo49i9qJCGDdK2Q9BGR3W2R90OsPvtR-i0i4ovSdeoJvZcD9BQbHMQcLxzmiIf1WZcA5IbgaoLnipc2FX_fW_3Ztt8nNUs2m2wVd3CFrNrlLrvXLQIJ75FeeeDxJTW6G0PEkb9ZE8VWa7gzf0f4xVYmh3d2PzmBvSEGzpzNlxmW62pIWAfS04O3UYFJ_oXzTcULTWTo9VbMl3CTsITtbKHxfoegjoRp7NyXpRN0nny_lAh6QVpIm9hGhsEwYBJqFsfHCkYBVolHIhOow12IHnjZxKyyRuizVjh1DvsvcZBNcFoglAbEkIpaEKW_qKdOiTslFwJuIerJIta15nNwOQwbUCTpwm7zIIbBCSIIhSN_UIstk79NxA-h1CRSnsD2tyowOOCQWFWtAbjQggYXp5nCFvLJkoZn8i7lt8rwexpkYFphY-HEAAxavYH7A2-RhQTL16X3OQHgJv02iBjHVAFhYvTmSjE_zAushD2BJmPm2Irtz2_rXpT6--BCb5Pr-sH8oD3tHB0_IDT_nCZ7jhhukNZ8t7FNyVf-Yj7PZs5KnUPL1sunxD31Esxw
linkToPdf http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpR1raxQxMGiV4hffj9NqowiCdek-kmzuY2l7WrTHcT2l30I2ydoDb_fcvRP60X_uzL7oHiqI3xYyE5LZyWQm8yLktXQyEqC4eonlqce4FvCVRp7zhbFJwGVo0qrZRDwey_Pz4aTpc1q20e6tS7LOacAqTdlqf2nT-ohLsV-CVJUYdMY9LMjmyevkBgNDBmO6pmdfOjdCLH3ZuDJ_i9a7jDZF8pU7aTNecsNpWt1Fozv_vYu75HajhtKDmm_ukWsuu0-2TxtH-wPys0rMXeS2UtPpfFE1M6L4aksPZ-_o6ZTqzNLR0XtvcjyjoPnSQtt5k851SesAc1rLPmox6b1WTuk8o3mRLy90cQnLhjWU39ca3x8o-hCowd5GWb7QD8nn0fHs8IPXdGvwjPDDlcdEYjW3UqY6iE0kYsc1WF-O2zCwDmRZiHXA02EkDCiVzHAbB0baNA0can0yekS2sjxzTwiFaVgUGc5SG7BEwixxwrjUQ-477FAzIH7725RpSpljR41vqjJppFA1aRWQViFpFaC87VCWdR2PvwHvIi-oOhW1kwHqgDEO3As64oC8qiCwgkaGITpf9bos1cnZtAf0pgFKc1ie0U3GA2wSi271IHd6kHDETX-4ZUrViJhSBXE8FBItvAF52Q0jJobNZQ5-HMCARSh5GIkBeVzzcLf7UHAQ7jIckLjH3R0AFh7vj2Tzi6oAORMRTAmYey2PX1nWn4j69J-gd8n25GikPp2MPz4jt8LqjASez3bI1qpYu-fkpvmxmpfFi-rA_wJnz1X4
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multimodality+imaging+with+CT%2C+MR+and+FDG-PET+for+radiotherapy+target+volume+delineation+in+oropharyngeal+squamous+cell+carcinoma&rft.jtitle=BMC+cancer&rft.au=Bird%2C+David&rft.au=Scarsbrook%2C+Andrew+F.&rft.au=Sykes%2C+Jonathan&rft.au=Ramasamy%2C+Satiavani&rft.date=2015-11-04&rft.pub=BioMed+Central&rft.eissn=1471-2407&rft.volume=15&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12885-015-1867-8&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F26530182&rft.externalDocID=PMC4632362
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1471-2407&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1471-2407&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1471-2407&client=summon