Cue-elicited heart rate variability and attentional bias predict alcohol relapse following treatment

Rationale Identification of malleable neurocognitive predictors of relapse among alcohol-dependent individuals is important for the optimization of health care delivery and clinical services. Objectives Given that alcohol cue-reactivity can predict relapse, we evaluated cue-elicited high-frequency h...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Psychopharmacologia Vol. 222; no. 1; pp. 17 - 26
Main Authors: Garland, Eric L., Franken, Ingmar H. A., Howard, Matthew O.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer-Verlag 01.07.2012
Springer
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects:
ISSN:0033-3158, 1432-2072, 1432-2072
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Rationale Identification of malleable neurocognitive predictors of relapse among alcohol-dependent individuals is important for the optimization of health care delivery and clinical services. Objectives Given that alcohol cue-reactivity can predict relapse, we evaluated cue-elicited high-frequency heart rate variability (HFHRV) and alcohol attentional bias (AB) as potential relapse risk indices. Method Alcohol-dependent patients in long-term residential treatment who had participated in mindfulness-oriented therapy or an addiction support group completed a spatial cueing task as a measure of alcohol AB and an affect-modulated alcohol cue-reactivity protocol while HFHRV was assessed. Results Post-treatment HFHRV cue-reactivity and alcohol AB significantly predicted the occurrence and timing of relapse by 6-month follow-up, independent of treatment condition and after controlling for alcohol dependence severity. Alcohol-dependent patients who relapsed exhibited a significantly greater HFHRV reactivity to stress-primed alcohol cues than patients who did not relapse. Conclusions Cue-elicited HFHRV and alcohol AB can presage relapse and may therefore hold promise as prognostic indicators in clinical settings.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:0033-3158
1432-2072
1432-2072
DOI:10.1007/s00213-011-2618-4