Fibroblastic reticular cells enhance T cell metabolism and survival via epigenetic remodeling
Lymph node fibroblastic reticular cells (FRCs) respond to signals from activated T cells by releasing nitric oxide, which inhibits T cell proliferation and restricts the size of the expanding T cell pool. Whether interactions with FRCs also support the function or differentiation of activated CD8 +...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Nature immunology Vol. 20; no. 12; pp. 1668 - 1680 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
New York
Nature Publishing Group US
01.12.2019
Nature Publishing Group |
| Subjects: | |
| ISSN: | 1529-2908, 1529-2916, 1529-2916 |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Lymph node fibroblastic reticular cells (FRCs) respond to signals from activated T cells by releasing nitric oxide, which inhibits T cell proliferation and restricts the size of the expanding T cell pool. Whether interactions with FRCs also support the function or differentiation of activated CD8
+
T cells is not known. Here we report that encounters with FRCs enhanced cytokine production and remodeled chromatin accessibility in newly activated CD8
+
T cells via interleukin-6. These epigenetic changes facilitated metabolic reprogramming and amplified the activity of pro-survival pathways through differential transcription factor activity. Accordingly, FRC conditioning significantly enhanced the persistence of virus-specific CD8
+
T cells in vivo and augmented their differentiation into tissue-resident memory T cells. Our study demonstrates that FRCs play a role beyond restricting T cell expansion—they can also shape the fate and function of CD8
+
T cells.
Fibroblastic reticular cells (FRCs) are dynamic regulators of lymphoid tissue structure. Turley and colleagues show FRCs also support activated T cells by producing IL-6, which confers an advantage to CD8+ T cell memory responses. |
|---|---|
| Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 F.D.B. conceived and conducted most of the experiments, analyzed and interpreted data and wrote the manuscript. D.R.S. conducted experiments and analyzed and interpreted data. J.G., M.W.L., V.L.-K., F.A.S., H-J.K., K.B.Y., S.J.H.R., K.B. and V.N.K. conducted experiments and interpreted data. J.D.T. and I.A.S. discussed data and provided technical assistance. V.C., N.N.D. and B.D.M. discussed and interpreted data. A.H.S., W.N.H. and S.J.T. directed the study, analyzed and interpreted results and wrote the manuscript. Author contributions |
| ISSN: | 1529-2908 1529-2916 1529-2916 |
| DOI: | 10.1038/s41590-019-0515-x |