Unresponsive afferent nerve fibres in the sural nerve of the rat

1. The proportion of primary afferent nerve fibres in a skin nerve of the rat that responded or failed to respond to mechanical or thermal stimulation of the skin in the noxious and non-noxious range was analysed. 2. Activity of afferent nerve fibres was recorded from the dorsal roots. Units project...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of physiology Jg. 435; S. 229
Hauptverfasser: Handwerker, H O, Kilo, S, Reeh, P W
Format: Journal Article
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: England 01.04.1991
Schlagworte:
ISSN:0022-3751
Online-Zugang:Weitere Angaben
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Abstract 1. The proportion of primary afferent nerve fibres in a skin nerve of the rat that responded or failed to respond to mechanical or thermal stimulation of the skin in the noxious and non-noxious range was analysed. 2. Activity of afferent nerve fibres was recorded from the dorsal roots. Units projecting into the sural nerve were selected using supramaximal electrical stimulation of the nerve stem. All other hindleg nerves were cut. 3. The receptive fields were searched by carefully examining the hindleg skin with noxious and innocuous mechanical, cooling and warming stimuli. Probing of the intrinsic foot muscles and manipulation of the ankle and toe joints was employed to recruit units projecting to deeper tissues. 4. In a first series of twenty-two experiments, eighty-nine rapidly conducting myelinated A beta units, thirty slowly conducting myelinated A delta units and 101 unmyelinated C units were investigated. Most units were identified as belonging to one of the established classes of cutaneous sensory units and this was also ascertained by a collision test. 5. Two A beta, eight A delta and forty-six C fibres did not respond to any one of the stimuli. Electrical thresholds and conduction velocities of the unresponsive C fibres were not significantly different from those of the units responding to natural stimulation of their receptive fields. In the A delta group unresponsive and high threshold mechanoreceptive units were preferentially found among the units with the slowest conduction velocities. 6. In a second series of seven experiments, one single nerve filament containing responsive and unresponsive C fibres was tested repetitively at 30 min intervals. Twenty unresponsive units and seven units responding to noxious mechanical and/or heat stimuli were studied. Ten of the twenty initially unresponsive units became activated by mechanical and/or heat stimuli after observation times of 30-150 min. Some of these units had mechanical thresholds as low as 64 mN (tested with calibrated von Frey hairs), or thermal thresholds down to 42 degrees C. 7. Two of the ten C units which became responsive in the course of an experiment later lost their responsiveness again. On the other hand, two of the C units which were initially responsive to noxious heat and/or noxious mechanical stimuli became completely unresponsive after repetitive stimulation, whereas one unit initially only responding to noxious heat became responsive to mechanical stimuli, suggesting that mechanical and heat responsiveness may be separately gained or lost by sensory C fibres.
AbstractList 1. The proportion of primary afferent nerve fibres in a skin nerve of the rat that responded or failed to respond to mechanical or thermal stimulation of the skin in the noxious and non-noxious range was analysed. 2. Activity of afferent nerve fibres was recorded from the dorsal roots. Units projecting into the sural nerve were selected using supramaximal electrical stimulation of the nerve stem. All other hindleg nerves were cut. 3. The receptive fields were searched by carefully examining the hindleg skin with noxious and innocuous mechanical, cooling and warming stimuli. Probing of the intrinsic foot muscles and manipulation of the ankle and toe joints was employed to recruit units projecting to deeper tissues. 4. In a first series of twenty-two experiments, eighty-nine rapidly conducting myelinated A beta units, thirty slowly conducting myelinated A delta units and 101 unmyelinated C units were investigated. Most units were identified as belonging to one of the established classes of cutaneous sensory units and this was also ascertained by a collision test. 5. Two A beta, eight A delta and forty-six C fibres did not respond to any one of the stimuli. Electrical thresholds and conduction velocities of the unresponsive C fibres were not significantly different from those of the units responding to natural stimulation of their receptive fields. In the A delta group unresponsive and high threshold mechanoreceptive units were preferentially found among the units with the slowest conduction velocities. 6. In a second series of seven experiments, one single nerve filament containing responsive and unresponsive C fibres was tested repetitively at 30 min intervals. Twenty unresponsive units and seven units responding to noxious mechanical and/or heat stimuli were studied. Ten of the twenty initially unresponsive units became activated by mechanical and/or heat stimuli after observation times of 30-150 min. Some of these units had mechanical thresholds as low as 64 mN (tested with calibrated von Frey hairs), or thermal thresholds down to 42 degrees C. 7. Two of the ten C units which became responsive in the course of an experiment later lost their responsiveness again. On the other hand, two of the C units which were initially responsive to noxious heat and/or noxious mechanical stimuli became completely unresponsive after repetitive stimulation, whereas one unit initially only responding to noxious heat became responsive to mechanical stimuli, suggesting that mechanical and heat responsiveness may be separately gained or lost by sensory C fibres.
1. The proportion of primary afferent nerve fibres in a skin nerve of the rat that responded or failed to respond to mechanical or thermal stimulation of the skin in the noxious and non-noxious range was analysed. 2. Activity of afferent nerve fibres was recorded from the dorsal roots. Units projecting into the sural nerve were selected using supramaximal electrical stimulation of the nerve stem. All other hindleg nerves were cut. 3. The receptive fields were searched by carefully examining the hindleg skin with noxious and innocuous mechanical, cooling and warming stimuli. Probing of the intrinsic foot muscles and manipulation of the ankle and toe joints was employed to recruit units projecting to deeper tissues. 4. In a first series of twenty-two experiments, eighty-nine rapidly conducting myelinated A beta units, thirty slowly conducting myelinated A delta units and 101 unmyelinated C units were investigated. Most units were identified as belonging to one of the established classes of cutaneous sensory units and this was also ascertained by a collision test. 5. Two A beta, eight A delta and forty-six C fibres did not respond to any one of the stimuli. Electrical thresholds and conduction velocities of the unresponsive C fibres were not significantly different from those of the units responding to natural stimulation of their receptive fields. In the A delta group unresponsive and high threshold mechanoreceptive units were preferentially found among the units with the slowest conduction velocities. 6. In a second series of seven experiments, one single nerve filament containing responsive and unresponsive C fibres was tested repetitively at 30 min intervals. Twenty unresponsive units and seven units responding to noxious mechanical and/or heat stimuli were studied. Ten of the twenty initially unresponsive units became activated by mechanical and/or heat stimuli after observation times of 30-150 min. Some of these units had mechanical thresholds as low as 64 mN (tested with calibrated von Frey hairs), or thermal thresholds down to 42 degrees C. 7. Two of the ten C units which became responsive in the course of an experiment later lost their responsiveness again. On the other hand, two of the C units which were initially responsive to noxious heat and/or noxious mechanical stimuli became completely unresponsive after repetitive stimulation, whereas one unit initially only responding to noxious heat became responsive to mechanical stimuli, suggesting that mechanical and heat responsiveness may be separately gained or lost by sensory C fibres.1. The proportion of primary afferent nerve fibres in a skin nerve of the rat that responded or failed to respond to mechanical or thermal stimulation of the skin in the noxious and non-noxious range was analysed. 2. Activity of afferent nerve fibres was recorded from the dorsal roots. Units projecting into the sural nerve were selected using supramaximal electrical stimulation of the nerve stem. All other hindleg nerves were cut. 3. The receptive fields were searched by carefully examining the hindleg skin with noxious and innocuous mechanical, cooling and warming stimuli. Probing of the intrinsic foot muscles and manipulation of the ankle and toe joints was employed to recruit units projecting to deeper tissues. 4. In a first series of twenty-two experiments, eighty-nine rapidly conducting myelinated A beta units, thirty slowly conducting myelinated A delta units and 101 unmyelinated C units were investigated. Most units were identified as belonging to one of the established classes of cutaneous sensory units and this was also ascertained by a collision test. 5. Two A beta, eight A delta and forty-six C fibres did not respond to any one of the stimuli. Electrical thresholds and conduction velocities of the unresponsive C fibres were not significantly different from those of the units responding to natural stimulation of their receptive fields. In the A delta group unresponsive and high threshold mechanoreceptive units were preferentially found among the units with the slowest conduction velocities. 6. In a second series of seven experiments, one single nerve filament containing responsive and unresponsive C fibres was tested repetitively at 30 min intervals. Twenty unresponsive units and seven units responding to noxious mechanical and/or heat stimuli were studied. Ten of the twenty initially unresponsive units became activated by mechanical and/or heat stimuli after observation times of 30-150 min. Some of these units had mechanical thresholds as low as 64 mN (tested with calibrated von Frey hairs), or thermal thresholds down to 42 degrees C. 7. Two of the ten C units which became responsive in the course of an experiment later lost their responsiveness again. On the other hand, two of the C units which were initially responsive to noxious heat and/or noxious mechanical stimuli became completely unresponsive after repetitive stimulation, whereas one unit initially only responding to noxious heat became responsive to mechanical stimuli, suggesting that mechanical and heat responsiveness may be separately gained or lost by sensory C fibres.
Author Reeh, P W
Handwerker, H O
Kilo, S
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: H O
  surname: Handwerker
  fullname: Handwerker, H O
  organization: Department of Physiology and Biocybernetics, University of Erlangen, Germany
– sequence: 2
  givenname: S
  surname: Kilo
  fullname: Kilo, S
– sequence: 3
  givenname: P W
  surname: Reeh
  fullname: Reeh, P W
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1770437$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNotj81ugzAQhH1IlSZpH6EVp96guzbG7K1V1D8pUi_NGRmwFSIw1IZKefuiltPuzDdazW7ZyvXOMHaPkCCieDwPp0to-jZBIkzCAJhLUCu2AeA8FkriNduGcAZAAURrtkalIBVqw56Ozpsw9C40PybS1hpv3Bg542dpm3KGUeOi8WSiMHndLqS3f5bX4w27sroN5naZO3Z8ffnav8eHz7eP_fMhriSlFBPHCjUBydxmc4ts3kBwWabScqEV5inVmNV1qjMqBU9lJdHWuS5LyirI-Y49_N8dfP89mTAWXRMq07bamX4KheIyz5BgDt4twansTF0Mvum0vxTLy_wXEERZsg
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1523_JNEUROSCI_16_22_07331_1996
crossref_primary_10_3389_fphar_2020_614990
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bbadis_2007_01_008
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0894_1130_97_80062_2
crossref_primary_10_1016_0165_1838_93_90375_5
crossref_primary_10_1016_0306_4522_96_00264_3
crossref_primary_10_1186_1744_8069_6_58
crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_00394_2005
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroscience_2008_07_003
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1469_7793_1999_t01_1_00565_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neulet_2005_08_009
crossref_primary_10_1016_0301_0511_95_05145_7
crossref_primary_10_1016_0304_3959_92_90247_9
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1440_1681_1996_tb02579_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0896_6273_03_00462_8
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11916_999_0016_y
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0301_0082_98_00048_3
crossref_primary_10_1002_ejp_1333
crossref_primary_10_1016_0304_3959_94_00109_R
crossref_primary_10_3109_08990229409051392
crossref_primary_10_1016_0304_3959_94_00154_7
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mcna_2006_10_006
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00359_009_0482_z
crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_00082_2012
crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_1997_77_1_299
crossref_primary_10_1017_S0317167100013937
crossref_primary_10_1002_neu_20078
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0306_4522_97_00572_1
crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_00415_2010
crossref_primary_10_1186_1471_2202_13_15
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuron_2006_03_042
crossref_primary_10_1523_JNEUROSCI_5385_05_2006
crossref_primary_10_1113_jphysiol_2005_086199
crossref_primary_10_3389_fnins_2020_00524
crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_00502_2006
crossref_primary_10_1016_S1047_9651_18_30342_5
crossref_primary_10_1177_1352458509106210
crossref_primary_10_1016_0306_4522_92_90178_5
crossref_primary_10_1016_0304_3959_93_90183_P
crossref_primary_10_3109_08990229609051398
crossref_primary_10_1113_jphysiol_2003_042127
crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_2000_83_4_2239
crossref_primary_10_1016_S1082_3174_97_70004_7
crossref_primary_10_1016_S1537_5897_03_00040_5
crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_00324_2003
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pain_2008_10_004
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0006_8993_01_02787_1
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00429_017_1502_3
crossref_primary_10_1046_j_1460_9568_2003_02957_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_brainresbull_2006_12_008
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejpain_2007_11_010
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0304_3959_01_00339_6
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0306_4522_00_00454_1
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neulet_2009_10_006
crossref_primary_10_1002__SICI_1098_1136_199805_23_1_75__AID_GLIA7_3_0_CO_2_3
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1460_9568_1992_tb00146_x
crossref_primary_10_1111_ejn_12466
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejpain_2008_10_005
crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_00804_2004
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0896_6273_00_80047_1
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pain_2004_03_043
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pain_2004_08_026
crossref_primary_10_1053_j_gastro_2009_06_048
crossref_primary_10_1016_0168_0102_94_90058_2
crossref_primary_10_1113_JP273759
crossref_primary_10_1002__SICI_1098_2302_199609_29_6_497__AID_DEV2_3_0_CO_2_H
crossref_primary_10_1016_0959_4388_92_90183_L
crossref_primary_10_1523_JNEUROSCI_0893_09_2009
crossref_primary_10_1046_j_1460_9568_1998_00141_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0306_4522_96_00290_4
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0306_4522_97_00550_2
crossref_primary_10_1002_cne_23177
crossref_primary_10_1186_1744_8069_5_57
crossref_primary_10_1081_JBC_100104140
crossref_primary_10_1179_ptr_1999_4_2_105
crossref_primary_10_1016_0306_4522_93_90118_Y
crossref_primary_10_1111_jns_12546
crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_2001_85_4_1561
crossref_primary_10_1002_cne_24942
crossref_primary_10_1177_10454411010120060101
crossref_primary_10_1016_0304_3959_93_90027_M
crossref_primary_10_1186_1744_8069_2_28
crossref_primary_10_3109_13813459508996127
crossref_primary_10_1002_cne_903470203
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neures_2003_08_003
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroscience_2017_11_047
crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_00208_2001
crossref_primary_10_1523_JNEUROSCI_21_14_05358_2001
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neubiorev_2015_12_009
crossref_primary_10_1097_00004691_199701000_00002
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0304_3959_97_00108_5
crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_1999_81_3_963
crossref_primary_10_1038_sj_bjp_0702427
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12576_023_00896_y
crossref_primary_10_1002_syn_20992
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cobeha_2021_10_010
ContentType Journal Article
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1113/jphysiol.1991.sp018507
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod no_fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Anatomy & Physiology
ExternalDocumentID 1770437
Genre Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
-DZ
-~X
.3N
.55
.GA
.GJ
.Y3
05W
0R~
0YM
10A
123
18M
1OB
1OC
24P
29L
2WC
31~
33P
36B
3EH
3O-
3SF
4.4
50Y
50Z
51W
51X
52M
52N
52O
52P
52R
52S
52T
52U
52V
52W
52X
53G
5GY
5HH
5LA
5RE
5VS
66C
702
7PT
8-0
8-1
8-3
8-4
8-5
8UM
930
A01
A03
AAESR
AAEVG
AAFWJ
AAHHS
AAHQN
AAIPD
AAMNL
AANLZ
AAONW
AASGY
AAXRX
AAYCA
AAYJJ
AAZKR
ABCQN
ABCUV
ABEML
ABITZ
ABIVO
ABJNI
ABOCM
ABPPZ
ABPVW
ABQWH
ABXGK
ACAHQ
ACCFJ
ACCZN
ACFBH
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACGOF
ACIWK
ACMXC
ACNCT
ACPOU
ACPRK
ACSCC
ACXBN
ACXQS
ADBBV
ADBTR
ADEOM
ADIZJ
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADOZA
ADXAS
ADZMN
AEEZP
AEGXH
AEIGN
AEIMD
AEQDE
AEUQT
AEUYR
AFBPY
AFEBI
AFFNX
AFFPM
AFGKR
AFPWT
AFWVQ
AFZJQ
AHBTC
AI.
AIACR
AIAGR
AITYG
AIURR
AIWBW
AJBDE
ALAGY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
ALVPJ
AMBMR
AMYDB
AOIJS
ATUGU
AZBYB
AZVAB
BAFTC
BAWUL
BFHJK
BHBCM
BMXJE
BROTX
BRXPI
BY8
C1A
C45
CAG
CGR
CHEAL
COF
CS3
CUY
CVF
D-6
D-7
D-E
D-F
DCZOG
DIK
DPXWK
DR2
DRFUL
DRMAN
DRSTM
E3Z
EBS
ECM
EIF
EJD
EMOBN
EX3
F00
F01
F04
F5P
FA8
FIJ
FUBAC
G-S
G.N
GODZA
GX1
H.X
H13
HF~
HGLYW
HZI
HZ~
H~9
IHE
IPNFZ
IX1
J0M
K48
KBYEO
LATKE
LC2
LC3
LEEKS
LH4
LITHE
LOXES
LP6
LP7
LUTES
LW6
LYRES
MEWTI
MK4
MRFUL
MRMAN
MRSTM
MSFUL
MSMAN
MSSTM
MVM
MXFUL
MXMAN
MXSTM
N04
N05
N9A
NEJ
NF~
NPM
O66
O9-
OHT
OIG
OK1
OVD
P2P
P2W
P2X
P2Z
P4B
P4D
PKN
Q.N
Q11
QB0
R.K
RIG
ROL
RPM
RX1
SAMSI
SUPJJ
TEORI
TLM
TN5
TR2
UB1
UKR
UPT
V8K
VH1
W8F
W8V
W99
WBKPD
WH7
WHG
WIH
WIJ
WIK
WIN
WNSPC
WOHZO
WOQ
WOW
WQJ
WRC
WXI
WXSBR
WYISQ
X7M
XG1
XOL
YBU
YHG
YKV
YQT
YSK
YXB
YYP
YZZ
ZGI
ZXP
ZZTAW
~IA
~WT
7X8
ADXHL
AEYWJ
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c5949-921c1a90958f613060950325b45f23a71849d16dd4a69b3245c51fd8abb96c082
IEDL.DBID 7X8
ISICitedReferencesCount 138
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=10_1113_jphysiol_1991_sp018507&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 0022-3751
IngestDate Sun Sep 28 02:17:37 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 19 02:32:44 EST 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c5949-921c1a90958f613060950325b45f23a71849d16dd4a69b3245c51fd8abb96c082
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/1181459
PMID 1770437
PQID 72586190
PQPubID 23479
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_72586190
pubmed_primary_1770437
PublicationCentury 1900
PublicationDate April 1, 1991
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 1991-04-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 04
  year: 1991
  text: April 1, 1991
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 1990
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
PublicationTitle The Journal of physiology
PublicationTitleAlternate J Physiol
PublicationYear 1991
SSID ssj0013099
Score 1.712326
Snippet 1. The proportion of primary afferent nerve fibres in a skin nerve of the rat that responded or failed to respond to mechanical or thermal stimulation of the...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage 229
SubjectTerms Animals
Hot Temperature
Mechanoreceptors - physiology
Nerve Fibers - physiology
Neural Conduction - physiology
Physical Stimulation
Rats
Rats, Inbred Strains
Skin - innervation
Sural Nerve - physiology
Title Unresponsive afferent nerve fibres in the sural nerve of the rat
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1770437
https://www.proquest.com/docview/72586190
Volume 435
WOSCitedRecordID wos10_1113_jphysiol_1991_sp018507&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV07T8MwELYKZWDhVSrK0wNisxo7cWxLSFAhKgaoOlDULXL8QEWQFFIq9d9j54FYEANLhkSRrNPZ953vu-8AOA8tDQUnDFlNKYpSYpFUkiMjVGyw5Doqpyg83bPRiE-nYtwCl00vjKdVNmdieVDrXPk78j4jlDuwH1zN35GfGeVrq_UAjTXQDh2Q8T7Npj9qCIEQ31rhjOK6PxjjsP9SXhvkr75XD7utG7ioFbDfQWYZbIbb_1vmDtiqQSYcVF6xC1om2wOdQeYS7LcVvIDjal3586oDride8KfkyS4NlNW4lAXMPBMSWpdMmwLOMuhwIiy8REf9JbflK-c_-2AyvH28uUP1WAWkqIgEEgQrLIXDVtz67MFLzgUhoWlELQmlC1aR0DjWOpKxSB3goopiq7lMUxErBxm6YD3LM3MAICF1hkSlrwsH3Losl2gZMMlpGoY9cNZYKXFu62sRMjP5Z5E0duqBbmXoZF6paySYMa-3dPjnr0dgs-JteRrNMWhbt1_NCdhQy8Ws-DgtncE9R-OHLxCYvSg
linkProvider ProQuest
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Unresponsive+afferent+nerve+fibres+in+the+sural+nerve+of+the+rat&rft.jtitle=The+Journal+of+physiology&rft.au=Handwerker%2C+H+O&rft.au=Kilo%2C+S&rft.au=Reeh%2C+P+W&rft.date=1991-04-01&rft.issn=0022-3751&rft.volume=435&rft.spage=229&rft_id=info:doi/10.1113%2Fjphysiol.1991.sp018507&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0022-3751&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0022-3751&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0022-3751&client=summon