Comparing public and private hospitals in China: Evidence from Guangdong
Background The literature comparing private not-for-profit, for-profit, and government providers mostly relies on empirical evidence from high-income and established market economies. Studies from developing and transitional economies remain scarce, especially regarding patient case-mix and quality...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | BMC health services research Jg. 10; H. 1; S. 76 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
London
BioMed Central
23.03.2010
BioMed Central Ltd Springer Nature B.V BMC |
| Schlagworte: | |
| ISSN: | 1472-6963, 1472-6963 |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| Abstract | Background
The literature comparing private not-for-profit, for-profit, and government providers mostly relies on empirical evidence from high-income and established market economies. Studies from developing and transitional economies remain scarce, especially regarding patient case-mix and quality of care in public and private hospitals, even though countries such as China have expanded a mixed-ownership approach to service delivery. The purpose of this study is to compare the operations and performance of public and private hospitals in Guangdong Province, China, focusing on differences in patient case-mix and quality of care.
Methods
We analyze survey data collected from 362 government-owned and private hospitals in Guangdong Province in 2005, combining mandatorily reported administrative data with a survey instrument designed for this study. We use univariate and multi-variate regression analyses to compare hospital characteristics and to identify factors associated with simple measures of structural quality and patient outcomes.
Results
Compared to private hospitals, government hospitals have a higher average value of total assets, more pieces of expensive medical equipment, more employees, and more physicians (controlling for hospital beds, urban location, insurance network, and university affiliation). Government and for-profit private hospitals do not statistically differ in total staffing, although for-profits have proportionally more support staff and fewer medical professionals. Mortality rates for non-government non-profit and for-profit hospitals do not statistically differ from those of government hospitals of similar size, accreditation level, and patient mix.
Conclusions
In combination with other evidence on health service delivery in China, our results suggest that changes in ownership type alone are unlikely to dramatically improve or harm overall quality. System incentives need to be designed to reward desired hospital performance and protect vulnerable patients, regardless of hospital ownership type. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | The literature comparing private not-for-profit, for-profit, and government providers mostly relies on empirical evidence from high-income and established market economies. Studies from developing and transitional economies remain scarce, especially regarding patient case-mix and quality of care in public and private hospitals, even though countries such as China have expanded a mixed-ownership approach to service delivery. The purpose of this study is to compare the operations and performance of public and private hospitals in Guangdong Province, China, focusing on differences in patient case-mix and quality of care. We analyze survey data collected from 362 government-owned and private hospitals in Guangdong Province in 2005, combining mandatorily reported administrative data with a survey instrument designed for this study. We use univariate and multi-variate regression analyses to compare hospital characteristics and to identify factors associated with simple measures of structural quality and patient outcomes. Compared to private hospitals, government hospitals have a higher average value of total assets, more pieces of expensive medical equipment, more employees, and more physicians (controlling for hospital beds, urban location, insurance network, and university affiliation). Government and for-profit private hospitals do not statistically differ in total staffing, although for-profits have proportionally more support staff and fewer medical professionals. Mortality rates for non-government non-profit and for-profit hospitals do not statistically differ from those of government hospitals of similar size, accreditation level, and patient mix. In combination with other evidence on health service delivery in China, our results suggest that changes in ownership type alone are unlikely to dramatically improve or harm overall quality. System incentives need to be designed to reward desired hospital performance and protect vulnerable patients, regardless of hospital ownership type. The literature comparing private not-for-profit, for-profit, and government providers mostly relies on empirical evidence from high-income and established market economies. Studies from developing and transitional economies remain scarce, especially regarding patient case-mix and quality of care in public and private hospitals, even though countries such as China have expanded a mixed-ownership approach to service delivery. The purpose of this study is to compare the operations and performance of public and private hospitals in Guangdong Province, China, focusing on differences in patient case-mix and quality of care.BACKGROUNDThe literature comparing private not-for-profit, for-profit, and government providers mostly relies on empirical evidence from high-income and established market economies. Studies from developing and transitional economies remain scarce, especially regarding patient case-mix and quality of care in public and private hospitals, even though countries such as China have expanded a mixed-ownership approach to service delivery. The purpose of this study is to compare the operations and performance of public and private hospitals in Guangdong Province, China, focusing on differences in patient case-mix and quality of care.We analyze survey data collected from 362 government-owned and private hospitals in Guangdong Province in 2005, combining mandatorily reported administrative data with a survey instrument designed for this study. We use univariate and multi-variate regression analyses to compare hospital characteristics and to identify factors associated with simple measures of structural quality and patient outcomes.METHODSWe analyze survey data collected from 362 government-owned and private hospitals in Guangdong Province in 2005, combining mandatorily reported administrative data with a survey instrument designed for this study. We use univariate and multi-variate regression analyses to compare hospital characteristics and to identify factors associated with simple measures of structural quality and patient outcomes.Compared to private hospitals, government hospitals have a higher average value of total assets, more pieces of expensive medical equipment, more employees, and more physicians (controlling for hospital beds, urban location, insurance network, and university affiliation). Government and for-profit private hospitals do not statistically differ in total staffing, although for-profits have proportionally more support staff and fewer medical professionals. Mortality rates for non-government non-profit and for-profit hospitals do not statistically differ from those of government hospitals of similar size, accreditation level, and patient mix.RESULTSCompared to private hospitals, government hospitals have a higher average value of total assets, more pieces of expensive medical equipment, more employees, and more physicians (controlling for hospital beds, urban location, insurance network, and university affiliation). Government and for-profit private hospitals do not statistically differ in total staffing, although for-profits have proportionally more support staff and fewer medical professionals. Mortality rates for non-government non-profit and for-profit hospitals do not statistically differ from those of government hospitals of similar size, accreditation level, and patient mix.In combination with other evidence on health service delivery in China, our results suggest that changes in ownership type alone are unlikely to dramatically improve or harm overall quality. System incentives need to be designed to reward desired hospital performance and protect vulnerable patients, regardless of hospital ownership type.CONCLUSIONSIn combination with other evidence on health service delivery in China, our results suggest that changes in ownership type alone are unlikely to dramatically improve or harm overall quality. System incentives need to be designed to reward desired hospital performance and protect vulnerable patients, regardless of hospital ownership type. Abstract Background The literature comparing private not-for-profit, for-profit, and government providers mostly relies on empirical evidence from high-income and established market economies. Studies from developing and transitional economies remain scarce, especially regarding patient case-mix and quality of care in public and private hospitals, even though countries such as China have expanded a mixed-ownership approach to service delivery. The purpose of this study is to compare the operations and performance of public and private hospitals in Guangdong Province, China, focusing on differences in patient case-mix and quality of care. Methods We analyze survey data collected from 362 government-owned and private hospitals in Guangdong Province in 2005, combining mandatorily reported administrative data with a survey instrument designed for this study. We use univariate and multi-variate regression analyses to compare hospital characteristics and to identify factors associated with simple measures of structural quality and patient outcomes. Results Compared to private hospitals, government hospitals have a higher average value of total assets, more pieces of expensive medical equipment, more employees, and more physicians (controlling for hospital beds, urban location, insurance network, and university affiliation). Government and for-profit private hospitals do not statistically differ in total staffing, although for-profits have proportionally more support staff and fewer medical professionals. Mortality rates for non-government non-profit and for-profit hospitals do not statistically differ from those of government hospitals of similar size, accreditation level, and patient mix. Conclusions In combination with other evidence on health service delivery in China, our results suggest that changes in ownership type alone are unlikely to dramatically improve or harm overall quality. System incentives need to be designed to reward desired hospital performance and protect vulnerable patients, regardless of hospital ownership type. Background The literature comparing private not-for-profit, for-profit, and government providers mostly relies on empirical evidence from high-income and established market economies. Studies from developing and transitional economies remain scarce, especially regarding patient case-mix and quality of care in public and private hospitals, even though countries such as China have expanded a mixed-ownership approach to service delivery. The purpose of this study is to compare the operations and performance of public and private hospitals in Guangdong Province, China, focusing on differences in patient case-mix and quality of care. Methods We analyze survey data collected from 362 government-owned and private hospitals in Guangdong Province in 2005, combining mandatorily reported administrative data with a survey instrument designed for this study. We use univariate and multi-variate regression analyses to compare hospital characteristics and to identify factors associated with simple measures of structural quality and patient outcomes. Results Compared to private hospitals, government hospitals have a higher average value of total assets, more pieces of expensive medical equipment, more employees, and more physicians (controlling for hospital beds, urban location, insurance network, and university affiliation). Government and for-profit private hospitals do not statistically differ in total staffing, although for-profits have proportionally more support staff and fewer medical professionals. Mortality rates for non-government non-profit and for-profit hospitals do not statistically differ from those of government hospitals of similar size, accreditation level, and patient mix. Conclusions In combination with other evidence on health service delivery in China, our results suggest that changes in ownership type alone are unlikely to dramatically improve or harm overall quality. System incentives need to be designed to reward desired hospital performance and protect vulnerable patients, regardless of hospital ownership type. Background The literature comparing private not-for-profit, for-profit, and government providers mostly relies on empirical evidence from high-income and established market economies. Studies from developing and transitional economies remain scarce, especially regarding patient case-mix and quality of care in public and private hospitals, even though countries such as China have expanded a mixed-ownership approach to service delivery. The purpose of this study is to compare the operations and performance of public and private hospitals in Guangdong Province, China, focusing on differences in patient case-mix and quality of care. Methods We analyze survey data collected from 362 government-owned and private hospitals in Guangdong Province in 2005, combining mandatorily reported administrative data with a survey instrument designed for this study. We use univariate and multi-variate regression analyses to compare hospital characteristics and to identify factors associated with simple measures of structural quality and patient outcomes. Results Compared to private hospitals, government hospitals have a higher average value of total assets, more pieces of expensive medical equipment, more employees, and more physicians (controlling for hospital beds, urban location, insurance network, and university affiliation). Government and for-profit private hospitals do not statistically differ in total staffing, although for-profits have proportionally more support staff and fewer medical professionals. Mortality rates for non-government non-profit and for-profit hospitals do not statistically differ from those of government hospitals of similar size, accreditation level, and patient mix. Conclusions In combination with other evidence on health service delivery in China, our results suggest that changes in ownership type alone are unlikely to dramatically improve or harm overall quality. System incentives need to be designed to reward desired hospital performance and protect vulnerable patients, regardless of hospital ownership type. The literature comparing private not-for-profit, for-profit, and government providers mostly relies on empirical evidence from high-income and established market economies. Studies from developing and transitional economies remain scarce, especially regarding patient case-mix and quality of care in public and private hospitals, even though countries such as China have expanded a mixed-ownership approach to service delivery. The purpose of this study is to compare the operations and performance of public and private hospitals in Guangdong Province, China, focusing on differences in patient case-mix and quality of care. We analyze survey data collected from 362 government-owned and private hospitals in Guangdong Province in 2005, combining mandatorily reported administrative data with a survey instrument designed for this study. We use univariate and multi-variate regression analyses to compare hospital characteristics and to identify factors associated with simple measures of structural quality and patient outcomes. Compared to private hospitals, government hospitals have a higher average value of total assets, more pieces of expensive medical equipment, more employees, and more physicians (controlling for hospital beds, urban location, insurance network, and university affiliation). Government and for-profit private hospitals do not statistically differ in total staffing, although for-profits have proportionally more support staff and fewer medical professionals. Mortality rates for non-government non-profit and for-profit hospitals do not statistically differ from those of government hospitals of similar size, accreditation level, and patient mix. In combination with other evidence on health service delivery in China, our results suggest that changes in ownership type alone are unlikely to dramatically improve or harm overall quality. System incentives need to be designed to reward desired hospital performance and protect vulnerable patients, regardless of hospital ownership type. |
| ArticleNumber | 76 |
| Audience | Academic |
| Author | Wang, Jian Zhang, Jing Li, Congdong Lu, Mingshan Yang, Zhe Eggleston, Karen Quan, Hude |
| AuthorAffiliation | 3 Jinan University Management School, Guangzhou, PR China 2 Department of Economics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada 4 Center for Health Management and Policy, Shandong University, Shandong, PR China 5 Guangdong Bureau of Health Statistics Center, Guangzhou, PR China 6 Department of Economics, University of Maryland, USA 1 Shorenstein Asia-Pacific Research Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA 7 Department of Community Health Sciences and Centre for Health and Policy Studies, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada |
| AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: 6 Department of Economics, University of Maryland, USA – name: 1 Shorenstein Asia-Pacific Research Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA – name: 4 Center for Health Management and Policy, Shandong University, Shandong, PR China – name: 2 Department of Economics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada – name: 5 Guangdong Bureau of Health Statistics Center, Guangzhou, PR China – name: 3 Jinan University Management School, Guangzhou, PR China – name: 7 Department of Community Health Sciences and Centre for Health and Policy Studies, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Karen surname: Eggleston fullname: Eggleston, Karen organization: Shorenstein Asia-Pacific Research Center, Stanford University – sequence: 2 givenname: Mingshan surname: Lu fullname: Lu, Mingshan email: lu@ucalgary.ca organization: Department of Economics, University of Calgary – sequence: 3 givenname: Congdong surname: Li fullname: Li, Congdong organization: Jinan University Management School – sequence: 4 givenname: Jian surname: Wang fullname: Wang, Jian organization: Center for Health Management and Policy, Shandong University – sequence: 5 givenname: Zhe surname: Yang fullname: Yang, Zhe organization: Guangdong Bureau of Health Statistics Center – sequence: 6 givenname: Jing surname: Zhang fullname: Zhang, Jing organization: Department of Economics, University of Maryland – sequence: 7 givenname: Hude surname: Quan fullname: Quan, Hude organization: Department of Community Health Sciences and Centre for Health and Policy Studies, University of Calgary |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20331886$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNp1kktv1DAUhSNURB-wZociWLBK61dshwVSNSptpUpsYG35cZPxKLEHJxmJf4_DtKVTUXkR6-acL_fenNPiKMQARfEeo3OMJb_ATJCKN5xWGFWCvypOHitHT-7Hxek4bhDCQhLxpjgmiFIsJT8pblZx2OrkQ1duZ9N7W-rgym3yOz1BuY7j1k-6H0sfytXaB_2lvNp5B8FC2aY4lNezDp2LoXtbvG6zEN7dP8-Kn9-ufqxuqrvv17ery7vK1g2dKm5aStvGgjYgiXac1Jzxtm4Rltg1xliHhQHhpAFSG0QMAeMswnVTSy05PStu91wX9UblRgedfquovfpbiKlTOk3e9qAIWN1AywXTmGFba-oYAmcYEAaMosz6umfl0QdwFsKUdH8APXwT_Fp1caeIrCVmNAM-3wNS_DXDOKnBjxb6XgeI86gEpQ1iksus_PhMuYlzCnlTqkGEEEHFgvu0F3U6t-9DG_NX7YJUl4QwljclRVad_0eVj4PB25yP1uf6geHD0zEf53tIQRbUe4FNcRwTtMrmvz75uEzte4WRWtKmljypJU9LRSy-i2e-B_TLDrR3jNslc5D-reElyx9pt-Oc |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1136_bjophthalmol_2019_315103 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_eap_2021_06_008 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_lanwpc_2023_100991 crossref_primary_10_1111_tesg_12116 crossref_primary_10_2196_55400 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13561_024_00568_6 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12889_025_22893_z crossref_primary_10_1002_hec_3015 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph15030403 crossref_primary_10_18825_iremjournal_404249 crossref_primary_10_1093_heapol_czs130 crossref_primary_10_1108_IJCMA_07_2019_0119 crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000038327 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12884_020_03101_9 crossref_primary_10_4103_0366_6999_178971 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph17010082 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph19137570 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0237867 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12912_021_00655_7 crossref_primary_10_1016_S0140_6736_16_00343_3 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jtocrr_2022_100308 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12913_019_4483_5 crossref_primary_10_1177_0046958020971403 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0240747 crossref_primary_10_1080_13548506_2019_1668564 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12913_021_06525_x crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2020_040792 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpubh_2025_1543884 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph18062969 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11684_017_0534_7 crossref_primary_10_1093_heapol_czu062 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpubh_2022_1044550 crossref_primary_10_1017_dmp_2021_273 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_wneu_2023_04_082 crossref_primary_10_1136_jech_2011_200640 crossref_primary_10_1111_jphs_12047 crossref_primary_10_1002_hpm_2968 crossref_primary_10_1080_23288604_2025_2507975 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_omega_2020_102310 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_socscimed_2015_08_051 crossref_primary_10_1111_ecot_12239 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12913_021_07048_1 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_socscimed_2016_10_016 crossref_primary_10_1080_17516234_2024_2349983 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12962_022_00407_7 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13690_023_01029_y crossref_primary_10_1097_MLR_0000000000000414 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph15071503 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpubh_2024_1325166 crossref_primary_10_5144_0256_4947_2017_290 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph13090908 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61368-9 10.1136/bmj.323.7311.463 10.1377/hlthaff.27.4.1042 10.1377/hlthaff.26.3.w310 10.1377/hlthaff.27.4.937 10.1002/hec.1306 10.1002/hec.792 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67140-1 10.1093/heapol/17.2.121 10.1377/hlthaff.23.6.222 10.1016/j.healthpol.2005.07.002 10.1056/NEJM198712243172626 10.1093/heapol/13.2.107 10.1093/intqhc/11.4.309 10.1186/1475-9276-6-17 10.1162/003355300555448 10.1093/heapol/15.4.349 10.1186/1472-6963-9-148 10.1097/00005650-199901000-00012 10.1378/chest.115.3.613 10.1093/heapol/13.3.195 10.1002/hec.1333 10.5034/inquiryjrnl_44.1.41 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | Eggleston et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. COPYRIGHT 2010 BioMed Central Ltd. 2010 Eggleston et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Copyright ©2010 Eggleston et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010 Eggleston et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: Eggleston et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. – notice: COPYRIGHT 2010 BioMed Central Ltd. – notice: 2010 Eggleston et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. – notice: Copyright ©2010 Eggleston et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010 Eggleston et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. |
| DBID | C6C AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 3V. 7RV 7WY 7WZ 7X7 7XB 87Z 88C 88E 8FI 8FJ 8FK 8FL ABUWG AFKRA AZQEC BENPR BEZIV CCPQU DWQXO FRNLG FYUFA F~G GHDGH K60 K6~ K9. KB0 L.- M0C M0S M0T M1P NAPCQ PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQBIZ PQBZA PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI Q9U 7X8 5PM DOA |
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-10-76 |
| DatabaseName | Springer Nature OA Free Journals CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed ProQuest Central (Corporate) Nursing & Allied Health Database ABI/INFORM Collection ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only) Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) ABI/INFORM Collection Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Hospital Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central Essentials Proquest Central Business Premium Collection ProQuest One ProQuest Central Business Premium Collection (Alumni) Health Research Premium Collection ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate) Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Business Collection ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition) ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced ABI/INFORM Global ProQuest Health & Medical Collection Healthcare Administration Database Medical Database Nursing & Allied Health Premium ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic (New) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Business ProQuest One Business (Alumni) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic (retired) ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central Basic MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Publicly Available Content Database ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate) ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Business ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing ABI/INFORM Complete ProQuest Central ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection Health Research Premium Collection Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) ABI/INFORM Complete (Alumni Edition) Business Premium Collection ABI/INFORM Global ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Basic ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Health Management ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Business Collection ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) Nursing & Allied Health Premium ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Health Management (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Business (Alumni) ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source (Alumni) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) Business Premium Collection (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE Publicly Available Content Database |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: 7RV name: Nursing & Allied Health Database url: https://search.proquest.com/nahs sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Medicine Public Health |
| EISSN | 1472-6963 |
| EndPage | 76 |
| ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_2eca9ef674a141c5a3d40edb4e24e430 PMC2858143 2503347631 A224464687 20331886 10_1186_1472_6963_10_76 |
| Genre | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article Comparative Study |
| GeographicLocations | China |
| GeographicLocations_xml | – name: China |
| GroupedDBID | --- 0R~ 23N 2VQ 2WC 4.4 44B 53G 5VS 6J9 6PF 7RV 7WY 7X7 88E 8FI 8FJ 8FL AAFWJ AAJSJ AASML AAWTL ABDBF ABUWG ACGFO ACGFS ACIHN ACUHS ADBBV ADRAZ ADUKV AEAQA AENEX AFKRA AFPKN AHBYD AHMBA AHSBF AHYZX ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMKLP AMTXH AOIJS BAPOH BAWUL BCNDV BENPR BEZIV BFQNJ BMC BPHCQ BVXVI C1A C6C CCPQU CS3 DIK DU5 DWQXO E3Z EAD EAP EAS EBD EBLON EBS EJD EMB EMK EMOBN ESX F5P FRNLG FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 H13 HMCUK HYE IAO IHR INH INR IPNFZ ITC K60 K6~ KQ8 M0C M0T M1P M48 M~E NAPCQ O5R O5S OK1 OVT P2P PGMZT PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PPXIY PQBIZ PQBZA PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO PUEGO RBZ RIG RNS ROL RPM RSV SMD SOJ SV3 TR2 TUS UKHRP W2D WOQ WOW XSB AAYXX AFFHD CITATION ALIPV CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 3V. 7XB 8FK AZQEC K9. L.- PKEHL PQEST PQUKI Q9U 7X8 5PM |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c593t-6bf33f9ceabe82ad625646f5f0181d9bbcd17be7d8be25b02b2ebdc015958a863 |
| IEDL.DBID | RSV |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 59 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000277049800001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 1472-6963 |
| IngestDate | Mon Nov 10 04:33:24 EST 2025 Tue Nov 04 01:36:04 EST 2025 Fri Sep 05 14:43:38 EDT 2025 Tue Oct 07 05:40:11 EDT 2025 Tue Nov 11 10:41:36 EST 2025 Tue Nov 04 17:51:02 EST 2025 Mon Jul 21 05:51:32 EDT 2025 Tue Nov 18 21:42:57 EST 2025 Sat Nov 29 02:55:47 EST 2025 Sat Sep 06 07:21:39 EDT 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 1 |
| Keywords | Government Hospital Health Service Delivery Ownership Type Private Hospital Transitional Economy |
| Language | English |
| License | This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c593t-6bf33f9ceabe82ad625646f5f0181d9bbcd17be7d8be25b02b2ebdc015958a863 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
| OpenAccessLink | https://link.springer.com/10.1186/1472-6963-10-76 |
| PMID | 20331886 |
| PQID | 902227373 |
| PQPubID | 44821 |
| PageCount | 1 |
| ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_2eca9ef674a141c5a3d40edb4e24e430 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2858143 proquest_miscellaneous_733904868 proquest_journals_902227373 gale_infotracmisc_A224464687 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A224464687 pubmed_primary_20331886 crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_1472_6963_10_76 crossref_primary_10_1186_1472_6963_10_76 springer_journals_10_1186_1472_6963_10_76 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2010-03-23 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2010-03-23 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 03 year: 2010 text: 2010-03-23 day: 23 |
| PublicationDecade | 2010 |
| PublicationPlace | London |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: London – name: England |
| PublicationTitle | BMC health services research |
| PublicationTitleAbbrev | BMC Health Serv Res |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | BMC Health Serv Res |
| PublicationYear | 2010 |
| Publisher | BioMed Central BioMed Central Ltd Springer Nature B.V BMC |
| Publisher_xml | – name: BioMed Central – name: BioMed Central Ltd – name: Springer Nature B.V – name: BMC |
| References | Thomas, Hofer (CR24) 1999; 37 Patouillard, Goodman, Hanson, Mills (CR32) 2007; 6 Mache, Vitzthum, Nienhaus, Klapp, Groneberg (CR6) 2009; 9 Lim, Yang, Zhang, Feng, Zhou (CR12) 2004; 23 Palmer, Mills (CR31) 2003; 12 (CR16) 2004 Sun, Santoro, Meng, Liu, Eggleston (CR21) 2008; 27 CR10 Broomberg, Masobe, Mills (CR33) 1997 Mills, Brugha, Hanson, McPake (CR8) 2002; 80 Eggleston, Ling, Qingyue, Lindelow, Wagstaff (CR20) 2008; 17 Liu, Berman, Yip, Liang, Meng, Qu, Li (CR13) 2006; 77 Shen, Eggleston, Lau, Schmid (CR17) 2007; 44 Eggleston, Lu, Li, Wang, Yang, Zhang (CR18) 2009 Shen, Eggleston, Lau, Schmid (CR4) 2007; 44 (CR15) 2004 Brugha, Zwi (CR28) 1998; 13 Huang, Zhai, Sun, Chen, Liang (CR14) 2006; 25 Hart, Shleifer, Vishny (CR26) 1997; 112 Loevinsohn, Harding (CR2) 2005; 366 Eggleston, Shen, Lau, Schmid, Chan (CR5) 2007; 17 Barber, Bertozzi, Gertler (CR27) 2007; 26 Sivak, Rogers (CR23) 1999; 115 Meng, Liu, Shi (CR11) 2000; 15 Jing, Lu, Quan (CR9) 2008; 27 Devereaux, Peter, Choi, Weaver, Schünemann, Haines, Lavis, Grant, Haslam, Bhandari, Sullivan, Cook, Walter, Meade, Khan, Bhatnagar, Guyatt (CR3) 2002; 166 Hu, Tang, Liu, Zhao, Escobar, de Ferranti (CR19) 2008; 372 Crowley (CR1) 2001; 323 Montagu (CR29) 2002; 17 Hanson, Berman (CR7) 1998; 13 Tangcharoensathien, Bennett, Khongswatt, Supacutikul, Mills (CR30) 1999; 11 Dubois, Rogers, Moxley, Draper, Brook (CR22) 1987; 317 Thomas, Holloway, Guire (CR25) 1993; 30 N Palmer (1213_CR31) 2003; 12 O Hart (1213_CR26) 1997; 112 R Brugha (1213_CR28) 1998; 13 ED Sivak (1213_CR23) 1999; 115 V Tangcharoensathien (1213_CR30) 1999; 11 1213_CR10 D Montagu (1213_CR29) 2002; 17 J Broomberg (1213_CR33) 1997 JW Thomas (1213_CR25) 1993; 30 Y Shen (1213_CR4) 2007; 44 P Crowley (1213_CR1) 2001; 323 Y Shen (1213_CR17) 2007; 44 C Huang (1213_CR14) 2006; 25 K Eggleston (1213_CR5) 2007; 17 The Bureau of Health of Guangdong Province (1213_CR16) 2004 PJ Devereaux (1213_CR3) 2002; 166 K Eggleston (1213_CR18) 2009 JW Thomas (1213_CR24) 1999; 37 Q Meng (1213_CR11) 2000; 15 SL Barber (1213_CR27) 2007; 26 RW Dubois (1213_CR22) 1987; 317 K Hanson (1213_CR7) 1998; 13 B Loevinsohn (1213_CR2) 2005; 366 MK Lim (1213_CR12) 2004; 23 M Jing (1213_CR9) 2008; 27 A Mills (1213_CR8) 2002; 80 Guangdong Yearbook Press (1213_CR15) 2004 S Mache (1213_CR6) 2009; 9 Q Sun (1213_CR21) 2008; 27 Y Liu (1213_CR13) 2006; 77 S Hu (1213_CR19) 2008; 372 K Eggleston (1213_CR20) 2008; 17 E Patouillard (1213_CR32) 2007; 6 |
| References_xml | – volume: 372 start-page: 1846 year: 2008 end-page: 1853 ident: CR19 article-title: Reform of how health care is paid for in China: challenges and opportunities publication-title: Lancet doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61368-9 – volume: 323 start-page: 463 issue: 7311 year: 2001 end-page: 464 ident: CR1 article-title: Private health care in developing countries: strong public provision is only hope for health care in developing countries publication-title: BMJ doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7311.463 – volume: 27 start-page: 1042 issue: 4 year: 2008 end-page: 1050 ident: CR21 article-title: Pharmaceutical policy in China publication-title: Health Affairs doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.4.1042 – volume: 26 start-page: W310 issue: 3 year: 2007 end-page: 23 ident: CR27 article-title: Variations in prenatal care quality for the rural poor in Mexico publication-title: Health Affairs doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.3.w310 – year: 2009 ident: CR18 article-title: Comparing public and private hospitals in China: evidence from Guangdong publication-title: Stanford University Shorenstein Asia-Pacific Research Center Asia Health Policy Program working paper #7 – volume: 44 start-page: 41 issue: 1 year: 2007 end-page: 68 ident: CR4 article-title: Hospital ownership and financial performance: what explains the different findings in the empirical literature publication-title: Inquiry – volume: 27 start-page: 937 issue: 4 year: 2008 end-page: 948 ident: CR9 article-title: From a national, centrally planned health system to a system based on the market: lessons from China publication-title: Health Affairs doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.4.937 – ident: CR10 – volume: 17 start-page: 149 year: 2008 end-page: 165 ident: CR20 article-title: Health service delivery in China: a literature review publication-title: Health Economics doi: 10.1002/hec.1306 – volume: 12 start-page: 1005 issue: 12 year: 2003 end-page: 1020 ident: CR31 article-title: Classical versus relational approaches to understanding controls on a contract with independent GPs in South Africa publication-title: Health Econ doi: 10.1002/hec.792 – volume: 366 start-page: 676 issue: 9486 year: 2005 end-page: 681 ident: CR2 article-title: Buying results? Contracting for health service delivery in developing countries publication-title: Lancet doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67140-1 – year: 2004 ident: CR15 publication-title: Guangdong Yearbook – volume: 17 start-page: 121 issue: 2 year: 2002 end-page: 130 ident: CR29 article-title: Franchising of health services in low-income countries publication-title: Health Policy Plan doi: 10.1093/heapol/17.2.121 – volume: 30 start-page: 6 issue: 1 year: 1993 end-page: 22 ident: CR25 article-title: Validating risk-adjusted mortality as an indicator for quality of care publication-title: Inquiry – volume: 23 start-page: 222 issue: 6 year: 2004 end-page: 234 ident: CR12 article-title: Public perceptions of private health care in socialist China publication-title: Health Affairs doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.23.6.222 – volume: 77 start-page: 212 year: 2006 end-page: 220 ident: CR13 article-title: Health care in China: The role of non-government providers publication-title: Health Policy doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2005.07.002 – volume: 166 start-page: 1399 issue: 11 year: 2002 end-page: 1406 ident: CR3 article-title: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing mortality rates of private for-profit and private not-for-profit hospitals publication-title: CMAJ – year: 2004 ident: CR16 publication-title: Guangdong Bureau of Health Guangdong weisheng tongji xinxi jianben – volume: 44 start-page: 41 issue: 1 year: 2007 end-page: 68 ident: CR17 article-title: Hospital ownership and financial performance: what explains the different findings in the empirical literature? publication-title: Inquiry – volume: 25 start-page: 31 issue: 8 year: 2006 end-page: 33 ident: CR14 article-title: Guangdongsheng Minying Yiyuan Fazhan Cunzai Wenti Fenxi (Analysis of problems with the development of non-governmental hospitals in Guangdong Province) publication-title: Chinese Health Economics – volume: 317 start-page: 1674 issue: 26 year: 1987 end-page: 1680 ident: CR22 article-title: Hospital inpatient mortality: is it a predictor of quality? publication-title: N Engl J Med doi: 10.1056/NEJM198712243172626 – volume: 13 start-page: 107 issue: 2 year: 1998 end-page: 120 ident: CR28 article-title: Improving the quality of private sector delivery of public health services: challenges and strategies publication-title: Health Policy Plan doi: 10.1093/heapol/13.2.107 – volume: 11 start-page: 309 issue: 4 year: 1999 end-page: 317 ident: CR30 article-title: Patient satisfaction in Bangkok: the impact of hospital ownership and patient payment status publication-title: International Journal for Quality in Health Care doi: 10.1093/intqhc/11.4.309 – volume: 6 start-page: 17 issue: 1 year: 2007 ident: CR32 article-title: Can working with the private for-profit sector improve utilization of quality health services by the poor? A systematic review of the literature publication-title: Int J Equity Health doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-6-17 – volume: 112 start-page: 1127 issue: 4 year: 1997 end-page: 1161 ident: CR26 article-title: The proper scope of government: theory and an application to prisons publication-title: Quarterly Journal of Economics doi: 10.1162/003355300555448 – volume: 15 start-page: 349 issue: 4 year: 2000 end-page: 356 ident: CR11 article-title: Comparing the services and quality of private and public clinics in rural China publication-title: Health Policy and Planning doi: 10.1093/heapol/15.4.349 – year: 1997 ident: CR33 article-title: To purchase or to provide? The relative efficiency of contracting out versus direct public provision of hospital services in South Africa publication-title: Private Health Providers in Developing Countries: Serving the Public Interest? – volume: 9 start-page: 148 year: 2009 ident: CR6 article-title: Physicians' working conditions and job satisfaction: does ownership in Germany make a difference? publication-title: BMC Health Services Research doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-148 – volume: 37 start-page: 83 issue: 1 year: 1999 end-page: 92 ident: CR24 article-title: Accuracy of risk-adjusted mortality rate as a measure of hospital quality of care publication-title: Med Care doi: 10.1097/00005650-199901000-00012 – volume: 115 start-page: 613 issue: 3 year: 1999 ident: CR23 article-title: Assessing quality of care using in-hospital mortality publication-title: Chest doi: 10.1378/chest.115.3.613 – volume: 80 start-page: 325 issue: 4 year: 2002 end-page: 330 ident: CR8 article-title: What can be done about the private health sector in low-income countries? publication-title: Bulletin of the World Health Organization – volume: 13 start-page: 195 issue: 3 year: 1998 end-page: 211 ident: CR7 article-title: Private health can provision in developing countries: a preliminary analysis of levels and composition publication-title: Health Policy and Planning doi: 10.1093/heapol/13.3.195 – volume: 17 start-page: 1345 year: 2007 end-page: 1362 ident: CR5 article-title: Hospital ownership and quality of care: what explains the different results publication-title: Health Economics doi: 10.1002/hec.1333 – volume: 30 start-page: 6 issue: 1 year: 1993 ident: 1213_CR25 publication-title: Inquiry – volume-title: Guangdong Bureau of Health Guangdong weisheng tongji xinxi jianben year: 2004 ident: 1213_CR16 – ident: 1213_CR10 – volume: 13 start-page: 107 issue: 2 year: 1998 ident: 1213_CR28 publication-title: Health Policy Plan doi: 10.1093/heapol/13.2.107 – volume: 80 start-page: 325 issue: 4 year: 2002 ident: 1213_CR8 publication-title: Bulletin of the World Health Organization – volume: 13 start-page: 195 issue: 3 year: 1998 ident: 1213_CR7 publication-title: Health Policy and Planning doi: 10.1093/heapol/13.3.195 – volume: 9 start-page: 148 year: 2009 ident: 1213_CR6 publication-title: BMC Health Services Research doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-148 – volume: 44 start-page: 41 issue: 1 year: 2007 ident: 1213_CR17 publication-title: Inquiry doi: 10.5034/inquiryjrnl_44.1.41 – volume: 27 start-page: 937 issue: 4 year: 2008 ident: 1213_CR9 publication-title: Health Affairs doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.4.937 – volume: 17 start-page: 149 year: 2008 ident: 1213_CR20 publication-title: Health Economics doi: 10.1002/hec.1306 – volume: 27 start-page: 1042 issue: 4 year: 2008 ident: 1213_CR21 publication-title: Health Affairs doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.4.1042 – volume: 366 start-page: 676 issue: 9486 year: 2005 ident: 1213_CR2 publication-title: Lancet doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67140-1 – volume: 112 start-page: 1127 issue: 4 year: 1997 ident: 1213_CR26 publication-title: Quarterly Journal of Economics doi: 10.1162/003355300555448 – volume: 17 start-page: 1345 year: 2007 ident: 1213_CR5 publication-title: Health Economics doi: 10.1002/hec.1333 – volume: 15 start-page: 349 issue: 4 year: 2000 ident: 1213_CR11 publication-title: Health Policy and Planning doi: 10.1093/heapol/15.4.349 – volume: 77 start-page: 212 year: 2006 ident: 1213_CR13 publication-title: Health Policy doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2005.07.002 – volume: 115 start-page: 613 issue: 3 year: 1999 ident: 1213_CR23 publication-title: Chest doi: 10.1378/chest.115.3.613 – volume: 12 start-page: 1005 issue: 12 year: 2003 ident: 1213_CR31 publication-title: Health Econ doi: 10.1002/hec.792 – volume: 11 start-page: 309 issue: 4 year: 1999 ident: 1213_CR30 publication-title: International Journal for Quality in Health Care doi: 10.1093/intqhc/11.4.309 – volume-title: Stanford University Shorenstein Asia-Pacific Research Center Asia Health Policy Program working paper #7 year: 2009 ident: 1213_CR18 – volume: 166 start-page: 1399 issue: 11 year: 2002 ident: 1213_CR3 publication-title: CMAJ – volume: 323 start-page: 463 issue: 7311 year: 2001 ident: 1213_CR1 publication-title: BMJ doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7311.463 – volume: 44 start-page: 41 issue: 1 year: 2007 ident: 1213_CR4 publication-title: Inquiry doi: 10.5034/inquiryjrnl_44.1.41 – volume-title: Guangdong Yearbook year: 2004 ident: 1213_CR15 – volume: 372 start-page: 1846 year: 2008 ident: 1213_CR19 publication-title: Lancet doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61368-9 – volume: 17 start-page: 121 issue: 2 year: 2002 ident: 1213_CR29 publication-title: Health Policy Plan doi: 10.1093/heapol/17.2.121 – volume: 37 start-page: 83 issue: 1 year: 1999 ident: 1213_CR24 publication-title: Med Care doi: 10.1097/00005650-199901000-00012 – volume-title: Private Health Providers in Developing Countries: Serving the Public Interest? year: 1997 ident: 1213_CR33 – volume: 317 start-page: 1674 issue: 26 year: 1987 ident: 1213_CR22 publication-title: N Engl J Med doi: 10.1056/NEJM198712243172626 – volume: 26 start-page: W310 issue: 3 year: 2007 ident: 1213_CR27 publication-title: Health Affairs doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.3.w310 – volume: 25 start-page: 31 issue: 8 year: 2006 ident: 1213_CR14 publication-title: Chinese Health Economics – volume: 6 start-page: 17 issue: 1 year: 2007 ident: 1213_CR32 publication-title: Int J Equity Health doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-6-17 – volume: 23 start-page: 222 issue: 6 year: 2004 ident: 1213_CR12 publication-title: Health Affairs doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.23.6.222 |
| SSID | ssj0017827 |
| Score | 2.1841164 |
| Snippet | Background
The literature comparing private not-for-profit, for-profit, and government providers mostly relies on empirical evidence from high-income and... The literature comparing private not-for-profit, for-profit, and government providers mostly relies on empirical evidence from high-income and established... Background The literature comparing private not-for-profit, for-profit, and government providers mostly relies on empirical evidence from high-income and... Abstract Background: The literature comparing private not-for-profit, for-profit, and government providers mostly relies on empirical evidence from high-income... Abstract Background The literature comparing private not-for-profit, for-profit, and government providers mostly relies on empirical evidence from high-income... |
| SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest gale pubmed crossref springer |
| SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
| StartPage | 76 |
| SubjectTerms | Accreditation China Data collection Diagnosis-Related Groups Health Administration Health economics Health Informatics Health sciences Health services Hospitals Hospitals, Private - economics Hospitals, Private - standards Hospitals, Proprietary - economics Hospitals, Proprietary - standards Hospitals, Public Hospitals, Public - economics Hospitals, Public - standards Human subjects Humans Medical care Medicine Medicine & Public Health Mortality Multivariate Analysis Nursing Research Patient satisfaction Private sector Public Health Quality management Quality of Health Care Reforms Research Article Studies Variables |
| SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELZQxQEJIcoztCAfkIBD6MZ2_OBWKqqeKg4g9Wb5MdmuhLyou-3vZ-w8uimquHC1ncgz-WzPxPb3EfIenGwAe1gDd7wWBmLtXWtq8FKBaLlswRWxCXV-ri8uzPcdqa98JqynB-4dd8QgOAOdVMI1ogmt41EsIHoBTIDgJVvHqGdMpob9A1z3iqyKUKyWiLGB1KfR8mgqyzNQphrZWY8Kbf_fk_PO6nT35OSd7dOyKp0-JU-GcJIe92bskweQnpHH_b842l8xek7OTnqxwbSkPas1dSlSfOMNBpr0clAO2dBVokVO-wsdtUZpvn1CEUZpGddp-YL8PP324-SsHhQU6tAavq2l7zjvTADnQTMXMdmRQnZtl2m6ovE-xEZ5UFF7YK1fMM_Ax4Ahgmm105K_JHtpneA1oQ6iFL7pIui898edaRgmGzE41enAeEU-j360YaAXzyoXv2xJM7S02fE2Oz6XKFmRj9MDv3tmjfubfs0fZmqWKbFLAQLFDkCx_wJKRT7kz2rzwMWOBTfcP0DzMgWWPcZgRqB3tKrI4awlDrgwqz4YgWGHAb-xplwq5gr9QKfa_GA-w5Zgfb2xinOTCQ51RV71KJoMYguOc6tGQ9UMXzOL5zVpdVnIwJluNca8Ffk0IvG2U_e4883_cOcBedQfpOA144dkb3t1DW_Jw3CzXW2u3pXR-Afzmjaa priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – databaseName: Proquest Central dbid: BENPR link: http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Lb9QwEB7BlgMS4g0NLcgHJOAQurEdP7igtmrV06pCIPVm-THZrlRly-62v7924g3donLhajuSx_48Hsfj7wP4iFZUGHtYIrOs5BpD6WytS3RCIq-ZqNF2YhNyMlFnZ_o05-Ysc1rl2id2jjrMffpHvqe7V5tMsu-Xv8skGpUuV7OCxkPYSkRlfARbB0eT0x_DNULc_mTm86mU2Ku4pKWIkEvOJ7GM3NqKOsb-v_3yrY3pbtLknZvTbkM6fvafpjyHpzkSJfs9dF7AA2xfwpP-Nx7pXye9gpPDXqewnZKeEJvYNpDYo-sYo5LzLDqyJLOWdErc38happSkhyskIrCdhnk7fQ2_jo9-Hp6UWXyh9LVmq1K4hrFGe7QOFbUhnpMEF03dJIavoJ3zoZIOZVAOae3G1FF0wcfoQtfKKsHewKidt7gNxGIQ3FVNQJWuDZnVFY3nlOCtbJSnrICv63kwPjOTJ4GMC9OdUJQwaeJMmrhUIkUBn4cPLntSjvubHqSJHZolNu2uYL6Ymrw4DUVvNTZCclvxyteWBT7G4DhSjpyNC_iUYGHSmo8d8zY_XYjmJfYssx_jIB5HR8kCdjdaxrXqN6p31ogw2VcszQCHAshQmz5M6W8tzq-WRjKmEzeiKuBtj8LBIDpm0S2raKjcwOeGxZs17ey84xGnqlYxXC7gyxrJfzp1z3C--6cBO_C4T65gJWW7MFotrvA9PPLXq9ly8SEvzhtKjELC priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest |
| Title | Comparing public and private hospitals in China: Evidence from Guangdong |
| URI | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/1472-6963-10-76 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20331886 https://www.proquest.com/docview/902227373 https://www.proquest.com/docview/733904868 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC2858143 https://doaj.org/article/2eca9ef674a141c5a3d40edb4e24e430 |
| Volume | 10 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos000277049800001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVADU databaseName: BioMed Central Open Access Free customDbUrl: eissn: 1472-6963 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0017827 issn: 1472-6963 databaseCode: RBZ dateStart: 20010101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.biomedcentral.com/search/ providerName: BioMedCentral – providerCode: PRVAON databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals customDbUrl: eissn: 1472-6963 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0017827 issn: 1472-6963 databaseCode: DOA dateStart: 20010101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.doaj.org/ providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – providerCode: PRVHPJ databaseName: ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources customDbUrl: eissn: 1472-6963 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0017827 issn: 1472-6963 databaseCode: M~E dateStart: 20010101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://road.issn.org providerName: ISSN International Centre – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: ABI/INFORM Collection - QC customDbUrl: eissn: 1472-6963 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0017827 issn: 1472-6963 databaseCode: 7WY dateStart: 20090101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.proquest.com/abicomplete providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: ABI/INFORM Global customDbUrl: eissn: 1472-6963 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0017827 issn: 1472-6963 databaseCode: M0C dateStart: 20090101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/abiglobal providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Health & Medical Collection customDbUrl: eissn: 1472-6963 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0017827 issn: 1472-6963 databaseCode: 7X7 dateStart: 20090101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/healthcomplete providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Healthcare Administration Database - QC customDbUrl: eissn: 1472-6963 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0017827 issn: 1472-6963 databaseCode: M0T dateStart: 20090101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/healthmanagement providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Nursing & Allied Health Database customDbUrl: eissn: 1472-6963 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0017827 issn: 1472-6963 databaseCode: 7RV dateStart: 20090101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/nahs providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: ProQuest Central customDbUrl: eissn: 1472-6963 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0017827 issn: 1472-6963 databaseCode: BENPR dateStart: 20090101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.proquest.com/central providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Publicly Available Content Database customDbUrl: eissn: 1472-6963 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0017827 issn: 1472-6963 databaseCode: PIMPY dateStart: 20090101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://search.proquest.com/publiccontent providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVAVX databaseName: SpringerLINK Contemporary 1997-Present customDbUrl: eissn: 1472-6963 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0017827 issn: 1472-6963 databaseCode: RSV dateStart: 20011201 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://link.springer.com/search?facet-content-type=%22Journal%22 providerName: Springer Nature |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnR1db9Mw8LQPhJAQH-MrbFR-QAIeAo3t2A5v27RpPLSqyhjlKfLHpauEUtR2-_3YTlLoYA_wcg_xWbEv9-Wc7w7gNWqRoV9hikyzlBfoUqPzIkUjJPKciRx1bDYhh0M1mRSjLci6XJh4270LSUZNHcVaiQ8ZlzQVnl-C5pBiG3a9rVNBFsefL9aBA2_wZFvB5y-TNoxPrNH_pyb-zRTdvCZ5I1YaTdDpw_9Y_CN40Pqb5LBhkMewhfUe3B20EfU9uN_8tyNNOtITODtuGhPWU9JUwCa6dsS_7No7peSy7TKyJLOaxNbbH0nXl5SETBXiWa6eunk9fQpfTk_Oj8_StttCavOCrVJhKsaqwqI2qKh2_mAkuKjyKpT0coUx1mXSoHTKIM1NnxqKxlnvThS50kqwZ7BTz2t8AUSjE9xklUMV4oRMFxn1BxNntayUpSyB991nKG1bijx0xPhexiOJEmWgVxnoFZ5IkcDb9YQfTRWO21GPwnddo4Xy2fHBfDEtW2ksKVpdYCUk1xnPbK6Z4310hiPlyFk_gTeBK8og5H5hVre5Cn57oVxWeegdH-6po2QCBxuYXjjtxvB-x1dlqxyWZRETkJn0dCDr0TAx3HercX61LCVjRSiGqBJ43jDhekO0z7weVn6jcoM9N3a8OVLPLmPhcKpy5f3jBN51TPprUbeQ8-U_4O7DveZuBUspO4Cd1eIKX8Ede72aLRc92JbjiwC_fgtwIiNUPdg9OhmOxr34N8TDQf84wnM_Mvo0GAVsL-E_AYn2Qug |
| linkProvider | Springer Nature |
| linkToHtml | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMw1V1Jb9QwFLZKQQIJsS-hBXwAQQ-hE9uxHSSESqGaqu2IwyD1Zry8TEdCmTIzLeJH8R_xyzJ0isqtB66xE_k5b_Hy3vcR8gKszCCOMAVueSoKCKmzeZGCkwpEzmUOtiabUIOBPjwsPq-QX10tDKZVdj6xdtRh4vGMfLOoqza54u-Pv6dIGoWXqx2DRqMVe_DzR9yxzd7tfoy_9yVjO5-G2_20JRVIfV7weSpdyXlZeLAONLMhrv-lkGVeInJVKJzzIVMOVNAOWO56zDFwwceoWeTaasnjd6-QqwirhxmEB73h4tIiBlvVogdlWm5mQrFURgVHV4eYJmcCX80P8HcUOBMGz6donrunrcPfzu3_bOLukFvtOptuNYZxl6xAdY_cbA4paVN7dZ_0txsWxmpEG7hvaqtA4wycxhU4PWopVWZ0XNGaZ_wt7UhYKZbl0Ghf1ShMqtED8uVShHlIVqtJBY8JtRCkcFkZQOOlKLdFxuIuLHirSu0ZT8ib7r8b3-KuI_3HN1Pvv7Q0qCgGFQWfKJmQ14sXjhvIkYu7fkBFWnRDrPD6wWQ6Mq3rMQy8LaCUSthMZD63PIgeBCeACRC8l5BXqIYGPVocmLdtYUYUD7HBzFZc5Yk4O1olZH2pZ_REfql5rdNA03rCmVmoX0LoohVfxOS-CiYnM6M4LxD5USfkUaP1C4FYj8ego6OgaskeliRebqnGRzVKOtO5jpuBhGx0lvNnUBdM55N_CvCcXO8PD_bN_u5gb43caNJIeMr4OlmdT0_gKbnmT-fj2fRZ7RYo-XrZ5vQbW2ag5A |
| linkToPdf | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Zb9QwELagoAoJcRQooQX8gAQ8hG5sxwdvpbAqAlaVONQ3y8dku1LlrTbb_n7sXJBCHxCvPhTPeMYeZ2a-QegFGF5AXGEO1NCcKfC5NaXKwXIBrKS8BNMUmxCzmTw-VkddbE7dR7v3Lsk2pyGhNIX13pmvWhWXfK9gguQ8yk46RQS_jm6wVDEoPda__hicCPHyEx2az18mjS6iBq__z1P5t2vpcsjkJb9pcx1N7_4nIffQnc4Oxfut4NxH1yBsoc0vnad9C91u_-fhNk3pATo8aAsWhjlukbGxCR7HD19EYxWfdNVHarwIuCnJ_Rb39UpxymDBURTD3C_D_CH6Pv3w7eAw76ow5K5UdJ1zW1FaKQfGgiTGxwcTZ7wqqwT15ZW1zhfCgvDSAinthFgC1rtoZqhSGsnpI7QRlgEeI2zAc2aLyoNM_kNqVEHig8U7IyrpCM3Qm35LtOsgylOljFPdPFUk14lfOvErtQieoVfDhLMWnePqoe_SHg_DEqx207BczXWnpZqAMwoqLpgpWOFKQz2bgLcMCANGJxl6mSREJ-WPC3Omy2GI5CUYLb0fDSIWuSNFhnZHI6PSulH3Ti9jujs0aq2axGQqIh_w0Jsmpji4AMvzWgtKVQJJlBnabgVyIIhMaDyfZSRUjER1RPG4JyxOGkBxIksZ7eYMve4F9teirmDnk38Y-xxtHr2f6s8fZ5920K02_ILmhO6ijfXqHJ6im-5ivahXzxr1_QkBV0TF |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparing+public+and+private+hospitals+in+China%3A+evidence+from+Guangdong&rft.jtitle=BMC+health+services+research&rft.au=Eggleston%2C+Karen&rft.au=Lu%2C+Mingshan&rft.au=Li%2C+Congdong&rft.au=Wang%2C+Jian&rft.date=2010-03-23&rft.pub=BioMed+Central+Ltd&rft.issn=1472-6963&rft.eissn=1472-6963&rft.volume=10&rft.spage=76&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2F1472-6963-10-76&rft.externalDocID=A224464687 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1472-6963&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1472-6963&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1472-6963&client=summon |